The man convicted of murdering a 22-year-old French woman whose body was discovered in an abandoned church in northern Italy has been spared a life sentence, receiving 25 years in prison despite a history of violence and a restraining order against him.
Sohaïb Teima, 24, was sentenced by the Aosta Court of Assizes over the killing of Auriane Laisné in April 2024. As reported by Actu, the young woman from the Lyon metropolitan area had been drugged with benzodiazepines before being taken to the remote location and stabbed multiple times.
Her body was found on April 5, 2024, inside an abandoned church above La Salle. According to La Stampa, she suffered fatal stab wounds to the neck and abdomen.
Prosecutors had sought life imprisonment. Public prosecutor Manlio D’Ambrosi told the court that investigators had built a “logical, coherent, precise, and timely reconstruction of the facts,” rejecting defense claims that the case was circumstantial. He said the investigation had produced “serious evidence” and dismissed suggestions that expert conclusions had been influenced.
Teima had been in a relationship with the victim and had already been the subject of multiple complaints for violence. He was under a restraining order prohibiting contact with Laisné, yet the pair had still been seen together shortly before the killing.
Ten days before the murder, the couple was stopped at the Mont Blanc Tunnel, but the restriction did not appear in the system, allowing them to continue their journey together.
Following the killing, Teima fled and was later arrested in Lyon near Perrache before being extradited to Italy. He also faced additional proceedings for violent offenses in Grenoble after the murder.
Despite the prosecution’s request for a life sentence, the court handed down a 25-year term. Defense lawyer Luca Tommaso Calabrò said the legal team was “only half satisfied,” arguing that life imprisonment would have been disproportionate while maintaining his client’s innocence.
The victim’s family described the trial as deeply painful. The family’s lawyer said, “It is difficult to be here today, and all our thoughts are with Auriane on what would have been her 24th birthday.”
It was clear. To “win”, all the Islamic Republic of Iran has to do was survive. It did that.
Those who hoped for an Iran without the Islamic dictatorship, without uranium enrichment and without ballistic missiles capable of striking Rome and Paris will have to wait and see.
Two weeks is the time Donald Trump, under internal and global pressure, has given himself to negotiate with the Islamic Republic.
Going from threats of “annihilation” to negotiating in Islamabad with the mullahs is not exactly ideal.
The killed the Supreme Leader father and turned the son into a ghost.
They eliminated dozens of key figures of the regime, at will, wherever, whoever, whenever they wanted.
They destroyed the Iranian Navy.
They degraded their missile stockpiles.
They took control of Iranian airspace more effectively than even Ryanair with its low-cost flights.
The United States and Israel should have stopped only after regime change had been achieved.
But that is the good news. Then there is the less good news:
-Iran is supposed to reopen maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. But various reports indicate that Iran, and even Oman on the other side of the strait, may be allowed to collect transit tolls.
-The nuclear issue remains one of the biggest question marks. According to Trump, the solution is to bury enriched uranium and prevent Iran from accessing it.
-The missile threat has not been eliminated, but greatly reduced. Fears of hundreds of missiles per day have given way to sporadic launches. The possibility that it is impossible to completely prevent missile fire from Iran is one reason for reaching an agreement.
-If it secures an agreement that includes lifting sanctions, the Iranian regime will consolidate itself for generations.
-Another major question is how Trump will act if Iran refuses to accept U.S. demands. Washington does not appear eager to return to fighting.
Compassionate Western voices denounced an “escalation,” as if 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent in the hands of the Revolutionary Guards were not a threat to the entire planet. And even if the Strait of Hormuz had not been freed, for them-the party of expensive gasoline-it was trivial compared to “international law.”
Egyptian Sawiris is worried:
“I don’t understand this ceasefire agreement. Does it not include the Gulf countries? Has America withdrawn and left the Gulf countries and Lebanon to their fate? An ambiguous, strange, unclear agreement that can only be interpreted as a victory for the Iranian regime, especially regarding the Strait of Hormuz, which was an open international passage before the war and is now recognized as dependent on Iran! It’s true: those who cover themselves with America remain naked…”
Nor do I consider ‘opening the Strait of Hormuz’ a war objective, given that Hormuz was open until America and Israel tried to sweep away Allah’s regents on earth (ayatollah means “sign of Allah”).
A month and a half ago, Iran controlled 4% of the world’s oil. Now they effectively control 20%.
Since the beginning of hostilities, the Lincoln aircraft has retreated over a thousand kilometers, realizing that in the era of drone warfare an aircraft carrier is just a large target. There were more American casualties in Panama and Grenada: was this just a “drôle de guerre”?
The Islamic dictatorship chose to rot standing rather than fall to its knees. For now, it seems to have succeeded. But the rot does not stop. It advances.
Tehran has gained time, control over oil and Western-Islamic narratives of “resilience.” It has lost allies and proxies, nuclear momentum and internal legitimacy.
Washington has discovered the dramatic limits of air war without boots on the ground-a taboo after Iraq and Afghanistan. And “Titanic Europe” has once again revealed its strategic cowardice.
Despite all the damage inflicted by the U.S. and Israel, the regime seems unbroken and functional.
There has been no mass uprising, thanks to brutal repression following January’s bloodbath: 657 executions in 2026, not counting tens of thousands massacred-7 hangings a day. Not bad in wartime.
Closing the Strait of Hormuz required minimal military effort but exerted maximum leverage on the global economy while boosting oil revenues (how fragile “happy globalization” is). The war is unpopular in the U.S. Trump’s social media posts sound increasingly chaotic.
The “free world” preferred to display hostility toward Trump and Netanyahu, while Islam is rejected in Iran but advances in a soft Europe, especially apathetic France. The paradox: this resistance to Islamic totalitarianism is not supported by Western public opinion. The rebellious Iranians remain forgotten.
“Drôle de guerre” is the name of the prelude before the fall of the Maginot Line and Nazi occupation of France, followed by what historian Marc Bloch named the “Strange Defeat”.
Emmanuel Macron refused overflight to U.S. planes carrying weapons to Israel. These acts of appeasement allowed Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris, detained in Tehran, to return to Paris. Pacifism and surrender pay…
Official France, with its deference to political Islam, has lost its taste for freedom.
Another example?
Spain, under socialist Sánchez, blocked U.S. base usage and had already secured permission from Iran to pass through Hormuz.
I don’t know who will win the war. But I am sure that Europe lost it.
Dr. David Starkey and Mark Littlewood of Popular Conservatism (PopCon) discuss what, in their view, the right needs to do to save Britain. Recorded at our New Culture Forum locals event in Beaconsfield.
The historic visit of JD Vance to Hungary (including to the Mathias Corvinus Collegium!) confirmed that hypocrisy is the native language of progressive elites. While the electoral campaign in Hungary has been an obscene and unprecedented festival of interference, the Euro-establishment chokes with indignation when the American Vice President comes to remind them that this election belongs to the Hungarians and to no one else. One must possess a truly steel-forged cynicism of the “anywhere” variety to express outrage when, after a month of campaigning, the only question the “somewhere” crowd is asking is whether they can still take part in free and fair elections in Europe.
After the scandalous precedents of electoral interference in Georgia, Poland, and Romania, we had been warned. And yet, once again, the autocratic impulse of Brussels and Co. has descended upon Hungary with the premium zeal reserved for its nemesis: Viktor Orbán, whose scalp they want, dead or alive. To achieve this, the actors in this sordid production have carefully orchestrated a choral strategy of formidable cynicism, following a familiar thread already used before: The “Putin card,” the hysterical invocation of Moscow’s hidden hand – the latest mutation of Godwin’s law, on steroids.
Starting with the Commission, which operates in the background but has nonetheless deployed from its DSA arsenal a “Rapid Response Mechanism” that fundamentally alters the rules of the online game. As we speak, a cartel of around forty representatives of “civil society” and “fact-checkers,” appointed (and very often funded) by the Berlaymont, in complete opacity, are telling Facebook and TikTok (the two most popular platforms in Hungary) which content should be removed. Given that, as revealed by the explosive report from the Republican group in Congress, “populist,” “anti-immigration,” or “anti-LGBTQ” opinions are to be banned, one can easily guess which candidate has seen their Facebook engagement melt away like snow in the sun. Not to mention that Ursula von der Leyen is also playing the card of barely veiled financial blackmail: Depending on how they vote, Hungarians are made to understand that the billions withheld from them will be returned… or not, as was the case in Poland.
Indeed, Donald Tusk knows something about this. Without changing a single law, and by violating a few others, he secured a windfall of €137 billion and obtained a form of immunity that allows him to trample the rule of law, while the Commission, in its Orwellian virtuosity, compels us to believe that he is merely “restoring” it. It was only natural that Tusk, in gratitude, would return the favour to his benefactors by inserting himself into the Hungarian campaign… though without quite matching the virtuosity of Zelensky, who has gone so far as to issue direct death threats against Orbán and to claim he will suffocate Hungary by shutting down the Druzhba pipeline until April 12, or beyond, if his pressure fails to produce the desired effect of electing “his” candidate.
But in this toxic swamp of dirty tricks and manipulation, the most striking innovation is probably the joint venture between regime-aligned media outlets (led by Politico and closely followed by Bloomberg and the Financial Times), USAID activists disguised as journalists, and European intelligence services. This triangle of operatives has devised a new system of circular espionage: Hacking the phones of member states, repackaging banal conversations as sensational scoops of high treason, and releasing them in dribs and drabs just days before an election. Effective? Not really. What can possibly be leaked from a Council of Ministers that is prepared upstream through dozens of meetings and surrounded by countless doorstep interviews? Nothing. What is confidential about a public EU position on minorities in Ukraine? Nothing. And what about peace negotiations? Everyone knows Orbán’s position on the matter, and JD Vance has in fact pointed out how constructive it is. The real scoop, by contrast, lies in placing a member state under surveillance and in catching a “journalist” on the payroll sharing confidential data with European intelligence services.
In short, a toxic campaign and shameless interventionism that cast the EU back to its worst instincts: Its authoritarian impulses and its contempt for democracy, precisely the excesses that JD Vance has been denouncing since his Munich speech. Add to this its belligerent obsession with Ukraine, its sabotage of any negotiation, and this pathological urge to immolate a continent on the altar of war, turning a project of peace into a war machine. The EU against Europe? That is where we are. And since the main bulwark against this destructive madness is Orbán’s Hungary, it must be removed, whatever it takes, including by preventing voters from choosing him freely. But as Vance reminded us, this election belongs to the Hungarians and to no one else, and there is a strong chance that on Sunday, they will not be intimidated. Even if Brussels and Co try to sabotage free and fair elections.
A trans-identified male convicted of the grisly murder of an infant has been released on parole a full 30 years early. Jonathan Richardson, who now uses the name Autumn Cordellioné, was convicted in 2002 after his 11-month-old stepdaughter died in his care while her mother was at work. Having served less than half of his 55-year sentence, Richardson was quietly released in late December of 2025.
A statement from the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office was published on March 26, warning the community of Richardson’s presence, and stating that the Indiana Department of Corrections (IDOC) had failed to notify local officials of the release of a “serious violent felon.”
Prosecutor Diana Moers explained that the County Prosecutor’s Office was not made aware of the IDOC’s decision, but rather Richardson had been spotted by a local who recognized him.
Without an official statement from the DOC, it is unclear why Richardson was released early. However, the decision may have been linked to an injunction granted in state court that required the IDOC to provide Richardson with taxpayer-funded cosmetic surgeries. Releasing Richardson early may have been the IDOC’s strategy to avoid paying for the court-ordered cosmetic enhancements.
As previously reported by Reduxx, in 2023, the ACLU of Indiana filed a legal complaint on behalf of Richardson claiming that the IDOC was subjecting him to “cruel and unusual punishment” by denying him the various plastic surgeries he had demanded.
In the suit, ACLU lawyers refer to Richardson as an “adult transgender female prisoner confined in a male institution,” and complains that “the total ban on gender-affirming surgery violates [his] right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.”
Among a list of demands prepared by Richardson and presented as evidence in court was a document titled “Surgeries to Reach My Ideal Self.” The first item on the list, the court heard, was a “vagina,” followed by: breast implants, a brow lift, a brow reduction, a tummy tuck, gluteal implants (BBL), a uterus transplant, hair removal, and wigs.
The ACLU has launched a legal complaint against the Indiana Department of Corrections on behalf of a transgender inmate they say was denied "gender affirming" surgeries.
Jonathan Richardson, also known as Autumn Cordellioné, murdered a baby.https://t.co/SFP7UkxR5X
However, during court proceedings Richardson stated that he had amended his demands to two surgeries, an orchiectomy and a penile inversion.
In addition to identifying as transgender, Richardson identifies as “Muslim,” and had launched a separate lawsuit against his prison’s chaplain for being denied a hijab.
During his deposition, Richardson told the legal counsel for the IDOC, Alex Carlisle, that in 2018, he had been informed about gender identity by another male inmate at CIF who went by the name of “Pearl.” According to Richardson, Pearl had brought in pamphlets from California state prisons that explained the concept of “gender identity” and introduced to him, for the first time, the idea of taking feminizing hormones.
Richardson as seen in a new social media post.
“I always knew I was a girl, didn’t know that term applied. Because until I talked to Pearl I didn’t even really know transgender was the name for it. I was hearing at the time that it was transsexualism and that didn’t seem to fit me because it was apparently people that like to wear girl clothes to have sex,” Richardson said in his deposition.
However, Richardson also stated that while briefly married to the mother of the infant he murdered, he had been working in an “adult bookstore” that sold pornographic videos. While employed as a janitor, Richardson would have sex with various male customers while pretending to be a “girl.”
Richardson further testified that he had taken the feminine name “Autumn” after his high school girlfriend, and said that he used to steal his sister’s clothing and his mother’s makeup as a youth. “When I put on the clothes, I could for a second realize the girl inside,” he said.
“I felt I was only a woman when a man used me,” Richardson remarked. “It was the only acceptable time to be a woman so it brought me a certain amount of satisfaction that I was pleasuring a man like a woman would and I got to express who I was.”
Richardson had been serving a 55-year sentence for the murder of his 11-month-old stepdaughter after he had been left to care for the child while her mother was at work. That night, he was visited by friends who observed he was “acting strangely” and refused to invite them in the house as he normally would.
Despite claiming the little girl was sleeping, Richardson had loud music playing in the home, and his guests noted that he appeared to have a fresh, bleeding tattoo of the child’s name carved into his arm. Shortly after his friends left, Richardson went to a neighbor’s home and asked them to call 911, claiming the child was unresponsive. The baby would later die at the hospital, with the cause of death determined to be asphyxiation by manual strangulation.
Richardson was booked awaiting a court hearing, and would later tell a prison official “all I know is I killed the little fucking bitch.” The following year, he was found guilty and sentenced to 55 years in prison.
Since being released, Richardson has created several social media profiles and has launched an OnlyFans, where he says he has been selling pornography of himself.
While Richardson’s exact location in Vanderburgh County is unknown, he has indicated that he is transient and has been living in hotels and other temporary accommodations. One source who reached out to Reduxx alleged that Richardson had been staying at a women’s shelter in the community.
On Reddit, Richardson describes himself as “a transfeminine polyamorous and pansexual and interacts with popular transgender forums. Richardson has also created his own called r/TransFreedom, though as of yet, he is the sole member.
“Come to a community where we care about each transgenders [sic] experience and their struggle, we are an open forum for civil discourse and a safe space to post, if you’re transgender or an ally then your [sic] already welcome regardless of your past,” reads the group’s description.
In other social media posts, the transgender baby killer describes being in a relationship with another man who claims to identify as transgender and was also convicted of killing an infant. In 2015, Cory Wallace set his house on fire in an attempt to cover up the fact that he had battered his 4-month old son to death. The following year, Wallace was convicted of charges including neglect of a dependent resulting in death and arson and sentenced to 72 years in prison.
On February 10, 2015, Wallace called 911 to report that their house was on fire and that the infant was trapped inside. Only four minutes would elapse from the time of his call until firefighters removed the child from the home, yet the boy was already dead.
The forensic pathologist who conducted Jensen Wallace’s autopsy concluded that the infant had died before the fire started, and noted several serious injuries which were inflicted by abuse, including two fractured ribs — one which was recent, and another which had been healing. Additionally, an investigator for the Muncie Fire Department concluded, upon investigation, that the fire was intentionally set.
Wallace admitted to police that he “accidentally” dropped the baby on a hardwood floor, and started a fire after he “freaked out” when the baby wasn’t breathing, according to the Delaware County probable cause affidavit.
An investigation by a local news team revealed that the Department of Child Services (DCS) had been warned about Wallace abusing and neglecting children as far back as 2012.
On April 18, 2023, Wallace, incarcerated at the Pendleton Correctional Facility, filed a petition for a change of the sex marker on his birth certificate because “[he] is living as a [t]ransgender [f]emale.” On July 25, 2023, the trial court dismissed Wallace’s petition. The judge cited “public policy” and an Indiana statute which restricts name changes for incarcerated individuals. Upon appeal, the request for a name change and sex marker alteration was thrown out on the basis that Wallace had not provided sufficient evidence to meet the “good faith” standard required by Indiana law for such changes.
Yet Wallace, who is to spend the rest of his life in prison, has persisted in filing lawsuits against the IDOC. In July 2023 Wallace demanded a hefty payout of $500,000 as compensation for not having been granted state-funded cosmetic surgeries.
“In June 2023, Miss Wallace was informed by Mental Health Staff that she would not be receiving Sexual Reassignment Surgical Evaluation… This amounts to Deliberate Indifference, thus violating her Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause to basic medical care.”
“I can’t sleep because I miss my trans significant other,” Richardson states in a video he posted to Instagram. “I call her my wife, but we’re not legally married. Her name’s Nikki, she’s beautiful. We spent so much time in the cell holding each other,” Richardson says, referring to Wallace.
In the video Richardson explains how he met Wallace after having been previously in a sexual relationship with the president of the Sureños, also known as the Sur 13 gang. Referring to Wallace with feminine pronouns, Richardson says, “She ended up moving in to the cell with me… The first night she moved in, I was like, ‘Want me to suck your d**k?’”
Richardson has made multiple images using AI generators, including images which imagine himself and Wallace with two young sons.
An AI-generated image created by Richardson depicting him and Wallace. Please note, the children in this image do not exist.
The 2023 ACLU lawsuit advocating for Richardson’s requested surgeries was successful the following year, when the United States District Court of Indiana ruled that Richardson had been subjected to “cruel and unusual punishment” by being denied the various plastic surgeries he had demanded.
The ruling issued by Judge Richard Young in September 2024 has far-reaching implications and sets a precedent for further surgeries and hormones to be doled out at taxpayers’ expense. The verdict declared that the statute added to Indiana’s legal code in 2023 barring the DOC from facilitating “medically necessary gender-affirming” surgeries for inmates qualifies as “sex discrimination.”
The mother of the baby girl Richardson strangled to death opposed his legal bid to obtain surgery. Linda Thomas submitted a brief statement expressing her concern that his identity may be concealed from her when he is released from prison.
“On the day he murdered my child, I personally observed Plaintiff with a fresh bleeding tattoo of my child’s name on his arm while I was at the hospital that evening,” Thomas said. “I live in fear for myself and my children of the day [Richardson] is released from prison, which largely increases at the thought that [his] identity may be concealed upon release.”
ACLU attorneys under the leadership of Kenneth Falk attempted to have Thomas’ testimony dismissed as court evidence on the basis that “Ms. Cordellioné objected to the relevance of this declaration.”
Leave it to Charles Dickens to describe the state of the UK Navy: Dead as a door nail. That’s about it.
UK PM Starmer is going through difficult times. They call him an “utter disgrace” because some of his constituents aren’t happy with his response to the Iran War:
Keir Starmer was torn apart by a former advisor to NATO, who condemned his recent actions regarding the conflict in the Middle East. Gwythian Prins, also a former adviser to NATO, the UN, and British Chiefs of the Defence Staff, called out the prime minister for destroying the UK’s relationship with the US, going as far to describe his behaviour as ‘traitorous’ in a furious rant.
The criticism is fair and NATO may not survive. The state of the UK Navy is more permanent and nothing to cheer about. In other words, the once mighty UK Navy is now nothing but a small collection of ships, and there is nothing royal about it. Let’s check this out:
2026 has been a horrible year for Britain’s Royal Navy, whose strength has now — depending on how it is calculated — fallen to historic lows.
The issue has caused a serious political flare-up after it emerged that the navy could not send an advanced destroyer for the defense of Cyprus after a UK air base came under drone attack on March 2. HMS Dragon finally sailed on March 10, some days after an 11-ship French fleet headed for the Mediterranean. Commentators declared a national scandal.
Many say the Royal Navy has been found wanting. The new First Sea Lord, Royal Marine General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, has staked his reputation on regenerating a capability to meet its NATO commitments in the North Atlantic by 2029, but this has involved cutting back the navy’s capability for global operations, only to be exposed by a crisis in the Mediterranean and Gulf.
Right now, the Royal Navy fleet looks like a construction site. All of the major classes of warships and support ships, without exception, are in various states of retirement, repair, construction, training, or crew regeneration. Some relatively new ships are tied up alongside but uncrewed as they await sufficient trained manpower and funding to be used operationally. It’s thought that of the force of just 13 destroyers and frigates, only around four are at sea. It’s the same story with attack submarines, where only one of the five vessels is known to be operational.
Only 5 vessels are known to be operational? Is Argentina thinking about going after “Las Malvinas”? I mean The Falklands, or that island way down there that the UK fought for in 1982. Could they do that today? I don’t think so. Could PM Starmer count on President Trump, like PM Thatcher counted on President Reagan? I don’t think so. We had a different relationship back then because the UK was also a different country, i.e. it was more British, as I heard a visitor say!
So how does this happen? How does a naval power destroy itself like this? I don’t know for sure, but relying on the U.S. for your defense is my explanation for this sad state of affairs. You let defense budgets plummet, offer generous benefits, and stop projecting maritime power, and the UK Navy is suddenly a joke.
More than 21,000 migrants have crossed the Channel to Britain in seven months, while fewer than 500 have been sent back under a flagship returns deal with France.
The stark imbalance has piled pressure on Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood to rethink the “one-in, one-out” scheme, which was designed to deter small boat crossings by returning arrivals to France in exchange for accepting a limited number via legal routes.
In practice, the policy has seen around 43 migrants arrive for every one removed, raising fresh doubts about its effectiveness.
The agreement, backed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, was meant to curb crossings from northern France. But arrivals remain high. Nearly 700 migrants made the journey in the first nine days of April alone—more than the total number returned over several months, according to GB News.
Overall, 21,172 migrants are reported to have completed the crossing since the scheme came into force in August 2025. Over the same period, 498 people were returned to France, while 482 asylum seekers were transferred from France to the UK under the legal route established by the deal.
The total number of arrivals—21,654—is only slightly lower than the 26,874 recorded over a similar period the previous year, suggesting the policy has had a limited impact.
The government had pledged to ramp up removals to 50 a week, but returns have averaged just under 15 per week since the scheme began.
The plan has also faced legal obstacles. In one recent case, the removal of an Eritrean asylum seeker was halted after a High Court judge raised concerns about the risk of harm. In another, a migrant was granted a 14-day reprieve to support a claim of being a victim of modern slavery.
Despite these challenges, the government insists enforcement is improving. Officials say more than 42,000 attempted crossings have been stopped since the last election, and nearly 60,000 people without legal status have been removed or deported.
At the same time, the UK continues to rely heavily on cooperation with France. Talks between London and Emmanuel Macron are ongoing, with Britain expected to increase financial support for French patrols along the Channel coast.
The UK has already spent £100 million on the current scheme, on top of hundreds of millions of pounds committed under previous agreements. Despite this, interception rates have fallen, with around one-third of attempted crossings stopped in early 2026—down from a peak in 2023.
The Home Office maintains the policy is part of a broader strategy to deter illegal migration. But a former Home Office official said the figures show the opposite effect, warning: “If there’s only a two per cent chance of being returned to France, it’s little wonder the boats keep coming.”
A Syrian care worker is alleged to have abused numerous elderly people in their homes and filmed his actions. Although he was initially suspended from work, he was later allowed to return to duty. The 22-year-old Syrian, Abdulrahman Al Khleed Almasalmeh, is alleged to have abused numerous elderly people in need of care whilst working as a carer. As an employee of an outpatient care service in Örebro, Sweden, Almasalmeh visited the elderly in their own homes, where he filmed his actions. The Syrian is now under investigation in a total of 13 cases involving assault, mistreatment and other forms of abuse of the elderly. Almasalmeh is a migrant who came to Sweden during the 2015 migration crisis and later obtained citizenship. This was reported by the Swedish news portal Samnytt.
Almasalmeh has filmed himself on several occasions mistreating and humiliating elderly people. In one video, his victim is a 92-year-old woman. The Syrian points at the elderly woman and shouts at her: “You look like a monkey.” As he points at her, he repeats: “You look like a monkey.” Almasalmeh then swings at the woman’s face. He grabs her nose and pulls it. He then continues to insult the Swedish woman in Arabic. “You whore. I swear I’ll curse you,” he adds, continuing: “Eat shit, whore!”
The Home Care Service in Sweden hired a Syrian gangster to take care of the elderly.
It ended with him recording himself abusing and torturing them while shouting “Allahu Akbar” @samhallsnytt reports that 22-year-old Abdulrahman Al Khleef Almasalmeh from Syrianis being… pic.twitter.com/fIpb1pL83i
In another video, Almasalmeh films himself sitting at a table in the same elderly woman’s home with a colleague, singing Arabic songs. The phrase “Allahu akbar” is also sung several times.
In another incident, also recorded by Almasalmeh, an 81-year-old man can be seen being viciously insulted and physically abused. The Syrian repeatedly called the elderly man a “son of a bitch”. He then filmed the pensioner in the shower, pouring alternately ice-cold and hot water over the elderly man. Meanwhile, the Syrian can be heard saying in Arabic: “I swear by Allah that I will make you freeze!”
Almasalmeh was arrested by the police in January 2026 and charged with several counts of abuse against 13 elderly victims. Originally there were 15, but two of the victims have since died. Curiously, according to media reports, Almasalmeh had previously come into conflict with the law on several occasions. He is said to have been convicted in two cases of assault and five cases of unlawful threats. Nevertheless, the company decided to hire Almasalmeh.
At the end of November, Almasalmeh was initially suspended with full pay whilst the police investigation was ongoing. However, he was allowed to return to work as early as January 2. In a police interview, department head Maid Prnjavorac explained that there had not been enough information regarding the status of the investigation to maintain the suspension for longer than a month. As a result, Almasalmeh was temporarily back on duty despite the allegations.
Failing Starmer was overwhelmingly spurned by British citizens
From a landslide victory to an absolute rejection by voters.
Failing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer remains one of the western world’s least popular ‘leaders’, despite his efforts to paint himself as a relevant and world-respected head of state.
And his poll numbers continue to sink, as we learn today that almost two-thirds of Brits want Starmer to resign immediately.
If that was not enough, a similar percentage of voters also want a general election now, according to a new poll.
“Fewer than one in five think the Prime Minister should stay on, while almost half of those who voted Labour at the 2024 general election want him to go.
Sir Keir is likely to come under increased pressure to step down if Labour fares badly in next month’s local elections, and there is a growing belief within the party that it cannot win the next general election with him as leader.”
Keir Starmer has been ridiculed by just about everyone today.
He looks weak, out of depth, irrelevant, clueless and most importantly, finished.
How much longer will his own MPs tolerate their awful polling, the humiliation at home and on the world stage?
The poll by JL Partners shows a majority of voters, in every region and age group, wanting the Prime Minister to be replaced.
“Asked ‘should Keir Starmer stay or go?’, 64 per cent of people said he should go and 18 per cent said he should stay. Of those who voted Labour in 2024, 46 per cent said they wanted him to go now.
[…] While Labour has attempted to rebrand the Prime Minister as a world statesman at a time of global conflict in an attempt to stem a wipe-out at the polls on May 7, the results are set to be brutal.”
NIGEL FARAGE: Starmer is our worst ever PM who believes in nothing except saving his own skin. That's why you must vote to get him out https://t.co/J9oAqUnR7s
