Ed Pentin, Diane Montagna slam Vatican’s reception of female ‘archbishop’ of Canterbury

Wikimedia Commons,Interestmedia, CC-BY-SA-4.0

Prominent Vatican journalists Edward Pentin and Diane Montagna decried the Vatican’s recent reception and celebration of the Anglican female “archbishop” of Canterbury as scandalous and “absurd.”

Montagna on Monday quoted from Pope Leo XIV’s address to Sarah Mullally in which he referred to “new problems” that “have arisen in recent decades, rendering the pathway to full communion” between the Catholic Church and Anglicans “more difficult to discern.”

“Of course, chief among these new problems is the fact that a woman dressed in liturgical attire is now being passed off – and celebrated by the Vatican and even by the Pope – as someone who seemingly has valid Orders when she doesn’t – first because she’s a woman and second because she’s an Anglican,” Montagna wrote.

She highlighted the fact that Archbishop Flavio Pace, Secretary of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, had gone so far as to “bow” before her and make the Sign of the Cross “as though receiving a real blessing from her” despite the fact that she doesn’t have valid orders.

“Absolutely absurd,” Montagna remarked in her post to Twitter.

In a Substack piece published Monday, Pentin similarly condemned the Vatican for receiving Mullally as if she had valid Orders and for neglecting any opportunity of fraternal correction of her errors.

Pentin shared that Pope Leo, in his address to Mullally, said that it would “be a scandal if Christians failed to continue working towards overcoming their divisions, however intractable they are.”

“But there is another kind of scandal, arguably more serious in the quest for Christian unity: portraying something as true that is evidently not, and trumpeting it from the rooftops,” Pentin commented.

He noted that while Anglican orders have been declared “absolutely null and utterly void” by Pope Leo XIII in Apostolicae Curae (1896), Catholic prelates gave “precisely the opposite impression” during Mullally’s visit to Rome. 

“From the moment she arrived, Vatican officials rolled out the red carpet, extending courtesies that went well beyond diplomatic hospitality and included gestures laden with ecclesial significance,” said Pentin, referring in part to Archbishop Pace’s bowing and making the Sign of the Cross as Mullally gave a “blessing” at the tomb of St. Peter.

He pointed out that she was also permitted to lead a public “moment of prayer” with the Pope in the Chapel of Urban VIII in the Apostolic Palace.

Pope Leo also “recalled his own episcopal motto, In Illo uno unum – in Christ, we are one” during his address to Mullally, Pentin noted.

“But can there ever be authentic ecclesial unity with a communion that lacks valid orders and promotes moral teachings at odds with Catholic doctrine, including women’s ordination?” Pentin asked rhetorically.

The Vatican journalist also questioned whether any good can come from receiving Mullally while entirely failing to address the errors of Anglicanism, which have grown more grievous over time. Mullally herself has “described herself in the past as ‘pro-choice rather than pro-life’ and supports blessings for same-sex couples,” Pentin noted.

The “cumulative effect” of the Vatican’s approach of dialogue without correction “has been to elevate symbolic closeness above doctrinal clarity,” which has likely only encouraged the Anglicans to persist in their errors, Pentin said.

“By publicly treating Sarah Mullally as a valid archbishop – allowing her to lead prayers with the Pope, bless a real archbishop in the Clementine Chapel, and officiate Anglican vespers in a historic Roman Church – the Vatican is serving to affirm her in her ecclesial ‘trans identity and error,’” he said.

“But if unity is to be real, it must be grounded in truth. Without that foundation, even the most gracious encounters risk becoming, in the end, the very stumbling blocks Pope Leo warns against, rather than steps toward communion.”

lifesitenews

50 Years of Family Reunification: Time To Take Stock

Exactly fifty years ago, France introduced the principle of family reunification for immigrants who had come to work in France. Over the years, the measure has taken on symbolic significance as a sign of an out-of-control migration policy, making it highly unpopular today. But which politician will dare, in the coming years, to tackle what is also considered a taboo in France, the principle  of the “land of welcome”?

On April 29, 1976, family reunification, as it remains in force in France today, was introduced under a centre-right government, with Jacques Chirac as Prime Minister and Valéry Giscard d’Estaing as President of the Republic.

The decree established the general framework for family reunification, allowing a foreign national legally resident in France to bring over their spouse and minor children. Other legal provisions already existed prior to this decree. Since the 1920s, a period when significant labour migration was flowing into France—which had suffered from a shortage of workers following the Great War—mainly from Poland and Italy, a ‘family reunification’ scheme existed. This was abolished in the 1970s, before being reinstated by Jacques Chirac and his then minister of labour, Michel Durafour.

The possibility for an immigrant worker in France to bring their family over is subject to certain conditions: they must have been legally resident in France for at least 18 months, must be able to prove stable financial resources and suitable accommodation, must respect public order and comply with specific French cultural norms: acceptance of monogamous marriage and gender equality. It was impossible, for example, to bring over a second wife. What seemed self-evident in 1976 is no longer taken for granted today, and there have been numerous abuses.

Fifty years on, the family reunification scheme has sparked widespread hostility among the French public. According to official figures, 16,429 people are estimated to have benefited from family reunification in the strict sense in 2024. In 2025, it accounted for only 5% of new entry permits–compared with 23% in the year 2000. Immigration for family reasons, which is broader than ‘family reunification’ alone, remains very significant, but for other reasons: nearly half (47%) of family visas are issued to “family members of French nationals” (spouses or parents of French children). Family structures have also changed: today, immigrants arrive in France as single people and start families later, whilst living there. The image of the family ‘left to the bled (the Algerian village)’ joining the father who has come to work in France is disappearing.

Whilst family reunification is not the primary channel for immigration, it serves as a symbol: it embodies the idea that one can enter French territory and enjoy the benefits of settling in France without contributing to the national wealth. “It is believed to be unproductive and [the beneficiaries] difficult to integrate, in contrast to so-called “selective” migration of skilled workers,” explains Julia Descamps, a researcher at the National Demographic Institute (INED).

According to a recent poll, 57% of French people would like to see an end to this policy. On the right, the National Rally and Reconquête have long called for its abolition or for stricter regulation of its implementation. But this position is also championed in the centre: at a time when Austria was debating the possible suspension of family reunification, Macronist MP Maud Bregeon felt that there was “a real problem with family reunification in France”, too, adding: “It is an initiative from which we should obviously take inspiration.”

The issue will certainly be on the table during the debates of the 2027 presidential campaign.

europeanconservative

Leftist SNP Housing Minister Claims ‘Too Few’ Migrants Are Coming to Scotland

Medforth AI

Scotland’s far-left Housing Minister has claimed that the country needs more immigration in a debate ahead of the upcoming elections for the locally devolved parliament.

Immigration has shot to the forefront of the May 7th race for control of the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood, as the leftist Scottish National Party (SNP) Housing Minister Mairi McAllan declared that Scotland is receiving “too few” migrants and that more should be imported to bolster the economy.

Appearing on a debate held on BBC Scotland, she added that Scotland is a “welcoming nation” and that immigration is “good for our economy, necessary for our economy, for our hospitality sector, health and social care, and our businesses.”

“Difficulties have been inflamed, they have been exploited, they have been exploited by the parties sitting next to me here, which I think has created an atmosphere of fear,” she added.

Reform UK Glasgow City Councillor Thomas Kerr said that the system is at a “breaking point” and that “enough is enough” with mass migration, pointing to the housing crisis in his city, which he claimed has been exacerbated by the SNP government’s asylum policies.

According to council statistics from March, Glasgow currently houses 9,337 homeless people in temporary accommodation. Out of that, 5,948 were classified as “refugees”, many of whom are being housed in hotels at taxpayer expense.

The scheme of housing migrants in hotels has come with some instances of violence, including in 2020 when a Sudanese national, Badreddin Abadlla Adam, went on a stabbing spree at his Glasgow hotel, injuring six people, including a police officer. It was reported that migrant had been dissatisfied with the free food provided, as macaroni and cheese was not “culturally appropriate”.

According to a BBC Scotland News opinion poll earlier this year, immigration ranked fourth among voters’ most important issues, behind the cost of living, health care, and the economy.

The growing concern about the mass migration agenda in Scotland, which has resulted in around 10 per cent of the population being foreign-born, has bolstered support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which has seen its poll ratings rise significantly.

After having won zero seats in the previous election, Reform currently stands tied for second place with the left-wing Labour Party, with both polling around 20 per cent.

The SNP is still the clear favourite at around 35 per cent; however, it remains to be seen if the leftist-separatist party will win enough votes to form a government on its own next month.

breitbart

Too “harsh” towards Muslims: Did the Berlin Youth Welfare Office refuse to assign a female police officer to investigate a Muslim rapist?

On March 11, 2026, allegations of a rape in Berlin’s Neukölln district at the Wutzkyallee youth centre (photo) shock the capital.Jugendzentrum Wutzkyallee – Google Maps

Further allegations have come to light in the case of the alleged rape of a 16-year-old girl at a youth centre in Berlin. A youth welfare office employee is said to have refused to allow a policewoman to intervene because she was too “harsh” towards Muslims.

The investigation into the allegation of a cover-up of an alleged rape at a youth centre in the Berlin district of Neukölln is becoming increasingly convoluted. A staff member at the Neukölln Youth Welfare Office is alleged to have refused the assistance of a police officer from the prevention team of the relevant police precinct.

Sevil Yildirim, the coordinator of a neighbouring girls’ centre which was also attended by the victim, is said to have wanted to call in two policewomen to investigate the rape. “She found one of the officers I suggested too harsh,” Yildirim told a team of investigators from the newspaper Tagesspiegel and the ZDF television programme Frontal about the employee. According to the coordinator, the Youth Welfare Office apparently had a problem with the fact that this officer took a “very hard stance” against Muslim youths.

The 16-year-old victim is alleged to have been raped by a 17-year-old in November 2025 in the garden of the youth centre on Wutzkyallee, which the facility shares with the girls’ centre “RosaMinta”.

The suspect is said to be a regular visitor to the youth centre and, in mid-January, to have been involved, along with other young people, in further sexual assaults on the 16-year-old.

News of the rape had become known internally when, a few days after the assaults in January, the victim confided in social workers at the neighbouring girls’ centre about the latest incident.

What followed was a series of discussions between staff from “RosaMinta” and the youth centre where the incident took place. The case came to public attention when the newspaper Bild first reported on it on March 11.

There was widespread horror, partly because accusations were immediately levelled at staff at the Neukölln Youth Welfare Office for failing to take action against the alleged perpetrators. It was reportedly claimed that this was done to avoid stigmatising Muslim youths. The 17-year-old alleged to have committed the rape is also said to be a Muslim.

The State Criminal Police Office and the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office are now investigating the case. A commission of independent experts, which was set up in mid-April, is due to present an initial interim report on the events in May.

Yet the accounts of the social and youth workers involved, as well as those of the Neukölln Youth Welfare Office, regarding the scandalous events could scarcely be more contradictory. This applies above all to the allegation against the youth centre and the Youth Welfare Office that they deliberately refrained from filing a criminal complaint against the alleged rapist.

Furthermore, the Youth Welfare Office is said to have failed to initiate a ‘child protection report’, as is mandatory in the case of such serious allegations as rape. Youth Affairs Councillor Sarah Nagel (The左派) was forced to admit this failure on March 21 in response to a question from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) during a meeting of the Youth Welfare Committee.

Several criminal complaints have been filed with the public prosecutor’s office against Nagel, the councillor responsible for the youth welfare office. Even with the support of the AfD, the CDU parliamentary group lacks the necessary majority in the Neukölln District Assembly to secure Nagel’s dismissal, which the group is seeking to push through. The Left Party, the Greens and the SPD have expressed their “disapproval” of Nagel’s role in the youth centre affair, but wish to leave it at that.

Nevertheless, the public prosecutor’s office is continuing to investigate whether the initial suspicion against Councillor Nagel is well-founded, the authority told FOCUS online on Thursday in response to an enquiry. Should this be the case, an official criminal investigation will be launched against her.

Those involved are completely at odds over why neither the youth centre nor the youth welfare office filed a criminal complaint regarding the rape.
There is disagreement over what happened following the incident. According to Sevil Yildirim from the neighbouring girls’ centre, it was the 16-year-old victim’s “express wish” that the youth centre on Wutzkyallee should contact the police and file a report. However, this wish was repeatedly disregarded by the staff at the youth centre.
According to research by the ‘Tagesspiegel’, staff at the youth centre are said to have repeatedly claimed in various internal memos regarding the investigation of the events that they did not know the names of either the victim or the suspect. The staff cite precisely this to justify why they did not comply with the girls’ centre’s insistence on filing a criminal complaint.

However, Yilderim from the neighbouring girls’ centre vehemently contradicts the youth centre’s account. “The girl’s name was known.” The same applies to the name of the alleged perpetrator. The staff at the youth centre “knew immediately which boy was involved”. It had been discussed among them that the group behind the sexual assaults in mid-January was also believed to have been involved, at least indirectly, in the alleged rape in November.

In an email, which is one of hundreds of conversation transcripts, a youth centre staff member writes to the head of the girls’ centre, however, that he can “clearly” remember the girl – including the “unpleasant situation in the chill-out room”, where further sexual assaults had taken place. “I don’t want to name names, but I think you know what I’m talking about.”

FOCUS online

French archdiocese cancels DJ priest appearance at St. Joan of Arc Festival after backlash

Father Guilherme Peixoto. Wikimedia Commons, Nuță Lucian, CC-BY-SA-4.0

The Archdiocese of Rouen cancelled a scheduled performance by a well-known Portuguese DJ priest at its Joan of Arc celebrations amid mounting criticism.

On April 30, organizers of the annual Joan of Arc festivities in Rouen, France, confirmed that Father Guilherme Peixoto, a Portuguese Catholic priest known for electronic music performances, would no longer appear at the event on May 14 after a period of escalating criticism regarding the appropriateness of his participation.

Officially, the priest requested a postponement, but the decision occurred amid sustained objections to the program.

The announcement represents a reversal of earlier plans that had presented Peixoto as one of the principal attractions of the celebrations pretending to honor Saint Joan of Arc. His withdrawal was confirmed without detailed explanation from diocesan authorities, leaving the precise reasons formally unspecified.

To replace him, organizers have arranged for a French DJ known as Charles B to perform, with an additional local artist scheduled as an opening act. However, they are not Catholic priests and their performances will be held without claiming any religious aura. Furthermore, the new musical events have been relegated to the profane dimension of the festivities.

The controversy surrounding Father Peixoto’s inclusion had developed over several weeks. Critics questioned the coherence between the religious and historical significance of St. Joan of Arc celebrations and the staging of an electronic music performance led by a priest with a public image rooted in entertainment. The objections focused not on logistical concerns but on the perceived incongruity between the nature of the event and the format of the performance.

St. Joan of Arc is widely associated with themes of piety, sacrifice, and fidelity, and the commemorations in Rouen traditionally reflect these dimensions. The introduction of a techno concert format into this context was therefore seen by some observers as a departure from established expectations.

In the absence of a detailed official statement, interpretations of the cancellation remain limited to observable circumstances. The timing of the decision after public objections suggests that the organizers were responsive to the controversy.

Father Peixoto, who gained international attention after his controversial participation in World Youth Day 2023, has recently become the focus of a new controversy in Argentina.

On April 18, marking one year since the death of Pope Francis, the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires organized a large techno music event with the priest’s participation. The initiative prompted a reaction from a group of young Argentine Catholics, who addressed a public letter to controversial Archbishop Jorge García Cuerva, condemning the event as a “dishonorable spectacle” and a “grave scandal.”

lifesitenews

Halal restaurant in France slammed for dedicated women’s area shut down over dozens of health violations

The Seven Times restaurant in Vaulx-en-Velin has been shut down by the local prefecture, pending the fulfillment of no less than 39 corrective measures for serious breaches of local hygiene rules. But this isn’t the first controversy for Lyon’s “largest halal-certified food court.”

Last December, Seven Times launched an all-girls room, which was finally ended over outcries of discrimination. The restaurant insisted that the “100% girls” area had zero link to Islam. But locals weren’t buying it.

National Rally (RN) deputy Jérôme Buisson at the time denounced the move as “unacceptable and illegal separatism” in a post sharing a TikTok video from the restaurant’s channel that clearly indicates only women may go to the girls-only room (seemingly in the back and completely shut away), while the rest of the restaurant, out in the open, is reserved for men. The man in the video is clearly pleased with the space provided for men, seemingly referencing some sort of cultural norm that this is appropriate.

Unfortunately, this is France, and people responded accordingly.

French law also stipulates that any establishment open to the public, such as a restaurant, cannot deny service or restrict access to specific areas based on sex.

For its part, the owner of Seven Times told Le Figaro, “It’s 20 square meters out of 400 where women can gather to celebrate birthdays or graduations. We’re very far from communalism; everyone comes as they are and sits wherever they want.” At the time, the owner also considered filing a complaint against Buisson.

As seen in the video posted by Fdesouche, the restaurant also has a prayer room and indicates that families may also gather for celebrations in the larger open area. They did, however, eventually backtrack on the dedicated room for women, reportedly removing the large sign denoting the “100-girls” area. Now, Seven Times has new legal issues.

During a visit by agents from the Departmental Directorate for Population Protection (DDPP) on Monday, April 20, 2026, several deficiencies were noted at the restaurant, reported Le Progrés. Violations included the presence of dead flying pests, the risk of unsanitary conditions due to chemical contamination, inadequate maintenance and cleaning of the premises, and poor storage and preservation conditions for raw materials.

Shockingly, the portal also discovered that one of the managers also owned another restaurant in Villefranche-sur-Saône, the Naan Factory, that was also shuttered in April over hygiene and food safety regulation violations. Fines were also imposed in this case due to the presence of three undeclared employees, two of whom were also undocumented.

rmx

Anti-whites bar in Berlin received €662,000 subsidies

The non-profit company has been running a co-working space with an integrated café at Dresdener Straße 11 in Berlin for several years. Dresdener Str. 11 – Google Maps

A Berlin café and “intersectional” co-working space that explicitly bars white people from entry has received more than €662,000 in German taxpayer subsidies from the federal Demokratie leben! (Live Democracy!) programme, sparking outrage over state-funded racial exclusion in the heart of the German capital.

The BIWOC Rising project in Kreuzberg operates as a “safer space” open only to “BIWoC and TIN*BIPoC” individuals — Black, Indigenous, Women of Colour and Trans, Inter, Non-Binary, BIPoC persons, as its own website explains.

White visitors are systematically excluded under the organisation’s own rules.

Despite this explicit racial gatekeeping, the non-profit has drawn substantial public funding over several years for what it describes as anti-discrimination and empowerment work.

The project has been funded since 2021 for that.

According to some, the total amount of subsidies may be substantially higher for related projects on refugees and asylum seekers.

Alternative for Germany (AfD) party co-leader Alice Weidel highlighted the case on social media, questioning how German authorities can justify subsidising racial segregation with public money.

The story, first prominently covered by Focus and Apollo News, quickly spread across alternative and mainstream platforms, prompting accusations of hypocrisy in a country that prides itself on strict anti-discrimination laws.

Critics argue the funding exposes a glaring double standard: While “no whites allowed” policies are tolerated — and even financed — under the banner of diversity and decolonisation, any equivalent exclusion based on other criteria would face immediate legal and political condemnation.

According to newspaper Die Welt, BIWOC Rising Managing Director Loubna Messaoudi posted on anniversary of the October 7 terrorist attack in Israel on social media, downplaying the incident as a “resistance to colonialism”.

The actress Mihaela Dragan, who is a member of the advisory board of the organisation, also delivered forthright anti-Israeli statements.

In light of the recent revelations, Federal Minister for Education, Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Karin Prien (CDU), haas now announced a “thorough review” and realignment of the Live Democracy! programme.

“Whoever draws public funds must stand firmly on the ground of the democratic basic order. Hatred and incitement have lost nothing here,” she said.

Prien added that she wants more attention paid to “loyalty to national goals” and efficiency.

Live Democracy! now has more than  200 projects set to lose funding by the end of 2026.

Berlin’s left-leaning cultural and integration scene has long championed such “exclusive safe spaces” for marginalised groups, claiming they provide necessary protection from structural racism.

brusselssignal

UK: Muslim Labour mayor who helped son conceal evidence of raping 15-year-old girl jailed

Diwan Khan was sentenced to 12 years in prison with an extended licence period of five years | HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT CONSTABULARY

An ex-Labour mayor has been jailed after she helped her adult son conceal evidence of him raping a 15-year-old girl.

Naheed Ejaz, 61, was sentenced to three years in prison at Winchester Crown Court for perverting the course of justice.

Naheed Ejaz was sentenced for three years for perverting the course of justice | HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT CONSTABULARY

The former town mayor for Bracknell Forest in Berkshire refused to allow officers into her home for more than a minute and a half while speaking Urdu to her son, Diwan Khan, 41, to allow him to hide his phone.

During a six-day trial, prosecutor Ed Wylde said Ejaz and Khan used the word “big bell” to refer to his phone.

Ejaz “chose to protect” her son, despite knowing his victim was an underage girl, Ejaz was told in court.

The judge added that there was a “real risk” Khan could have “avoided prosecution for the rape of an unconscious child”.

She served as mayor between 2023 and 2024 and stepped down as councillor in September 2024.

He admitted to perverting the course of justice in relation to hiding his phone

For the rape was sentenced to 12 years in prison with an extended licence period of five years upon release.

Khan raped the teenager after she “blacked out” from MDMA he put in vodka for her to drink.

The girl woke up in the backseat of Khan’s car without any clothes on and could not remember what happened.

Khan then showed a video he filmed of him raping, choking, and slapping the girl in the face, the court heard.

He threatened the girl after the attack, telling her he would “slit her throat” if she told anyone, and that she “belonged” to him.

He also threatened to show the video to the girl’s mother is she said anything about the accident.

The court heard how the young girl failed her GCSEs and attempted to kill herself following the rape.

Sentencing Ejaz, Judge Rufus Taylor said: “You, Naheed Ejaz, may not have known initially why he wanted you to hide [the phone], but your son told you in Urdu, ‘Some motherf***er girl has lied about her age to me’ and you chose to protect him.”

Judge Taylor accepted Ejaz made a spontaneous decision and noted a character witness who had described her as an “advocate for women’s rights”.

Bracknell Forest Council’s current Labour leader Helen Purnell thanked the victim for her courage in speaking out and said it was “right” that both Ejaz and Khan were behind bars.

She added: “Abuse against women and girls has no place in Bracknell Forest. I have put forward amendments to our domestic violence strategy to make sure more people in public roles are trained to intervene when they see unacceptable behaviours towards women in public.

“I have also launched an investigation into how Ejaz and Kahn were given taxi licenses, so that the public can have the full answers it deserves.”

In a victim impact statement to the court, the young girl said: “My mental health has been all over the place due to flashbacks, not being able to sleep.

“In June 2025 I tried to commit suicide and ended up in hospital. I just wanted to end my life so the pain would go away.”

Khan will serve eight years in prison before a parole board can consider his release.

He was also given a three-year concurrent sentence for perverting the course of justice, and is sexual harm prevention order of 20 years, and an indefinite restraining order against the girl.

gbnews

Norway: Migrant rapist gets a trivial 6-month sentence because he’s too ‘low-IQ’

Medforth AI

A 21-year-old migrant rapist, who assaulted and violated a 13-year-old girl, has just been given extreme leniency in Norway because the court has found him too stupid to be held accountable as a rapist should—he’s been sentenced to just six months in jail, and I have to wonder if he’ll get out early.

According to an article at Remix News, Syrian man Abdelmonem Abdelrazak Al-Yousef, who doesn’t speak any Norwegian, tried to deny that he ever met the girl, but the cops found his semen all over the asphalt of the bicycle parking area where the assault occurred, and spotted him on surveillance video. My kids have a phrase for situations like this: “caught in 4K.”

Naturally, the court rejected Al-Yousef’s defense, “noting it was entirely lacking in credibility”—DNA evidence and video footage tend to be conclusive! But, after forensic psychiatric experts evaluated Al-Yousef, they concluded that “he had a mild intellectual disability,” determining his IQ to be somewhere between 41and 75—which is typical for third world populations. So the judgment against Al-Yousef considered that “mitigating factor,” and decided that he really shouldn’t spend that much time behind bars. Too stupid to be punished, but smart enough to game the system.

The idea that people are too stupid to face the consequences of their own actions and therefore deserve to be catered to unfairly needs to be abolished. We can’t keep doing this. It’s endless, and the most grotesque miscarriages of justice I’ve ever seen.

Consider that there’s been an indefinite pause in the trial for Iryna Zarutska’s killer, until his mental capacity is “restored”:

Or, look at this:

These individuals are stupid to know that rape is wrong, or murder is wrong, but let me guess, they’re not too stupid to be out on our streets and in our neighborhoods, or vote and participate politically? Let’s not forget that’s the position actually held by your average leftist.

americanthinker