Allah's Willing Executioners

A public storm has erupted in the capital of the Silesia region, Katowice, in southern Poland, over the construction of a new Muslim prayer hall because local residents believe that they have been misled that it would be a small facility for around 45 people whereas a building covering more than 400 square metres is actually being built.

Residents are collecting signatures on a petition calling for the project to be stopped while the city authorities in Katowice have claimed that there was no legal requirement to hold public consultations before going ahead with the construction.

Several hundred locals protested in the Zawodzie district of Katowice on August 11, voicing their concerns about the project and the influx of Muslims in general. The demonstration was supported by the regional structures of the right-wing Confederation Liberty and Independence (Konfederacja) and the National Movement.

“If we don’t act in time, we’ll wake up when it’s too late. Islamisation in Poland will continue, just as it has in Berlin and in other Western European countries. I travel a lot; I was recently in Turkey, and I know how Muslims treat women and children. And now a mosque is being built here in Katowice, supposedly for 45 people, but the facility is very large and could accommodate many more,” Małgorzata Dąbrowska, a Katowice resident who strongly opposes the project in Zawodzie, told Niezależna.pl.

Opposition is being voiced not only in Katowice itself but also in neighbouring cities, where residents fear the loss of their Silesian region’s cultural and religious identity.

Those participating in the Katowice protest argued that Poland is a Catholic country and if Muslims wish to build mosques they should do so in their own countries. They were fearful that projects such as these could lead the way to Poland repeating the mistakes made with regards to Muslim migration in western Europe.

Michał Olszewski, a Katowice activist with the National Movement, argues that every prayer hall is in effect a mosque and claims that the project is being sponsored by the State of Qatar.

The Doha Centre for Culture and Dialogue is already operational in Katowice, organising, among other things, Arabic-language classes and cooking workshops. The newly constructed facility is connected to the tenement building that houses the centre, which has been at the site for close to 20 years.

Katowice authorities issued a building permit on January 12, 2026, and construction work began recently.

According to the Katowice local authority the investor is the Muslim Association for Cultural Education, based in Lublin, and there is no financial involvement by the municipality of Katowice.

“The City of Katowice is not participating in this project in any way. Questions concerning the cost of the investment should be directed to the investor,” said the authority’s statement.

The greatest controversy though concerns the scale of the facility. According to the Silesian news website Tarnowskie Góry the new building is to cover more than 400 square metres. City Hall, meanwhile, provides very different figures.

“According to the architectural and construction design, the building is intended to accommodate a maximum of 45 people at any one time. This limit applies to the entire investment project, including both the extension and the reconstruction of part of the existing building,” states the municipality.

The issue has also drawn the attention of Silesian MP Grzegorz Płaczek from the right-wing Confederation, who submitted a request to the Katowice authorities asking 41 questions with regard to the project.

The MP drew particular attention to the fact that the local community had not been informed in advance about the planned prayer hall. He has also called on the city mayor, Marcin Krupa, to hold a local referendum on how such projects should be consulted on.

But according to the city it did not have to consult on a project of this kind.

“The regulations governing proceedings concerning planning conditions and the granting of building permits do not provide for public consultations in cases of this kind. The parties to the administrative proceedings were, however, notified that the proceedings had been initiated and were allowed to actively participate in them,” the authority claimed.

The authority’s statement added that “no formal complaint concerning the development at 130 1 Maja Street has been submitted. Katowice City Hall has, however, received requests for access to public information, inquiries and correspondence, which have been forwarded to the relevant departments. Replies have been provided, or the matters are currently being processed in accordance with the applicable regulations.”

The investor denies that a larger place of worship is planned. “We are not building a mosque in Katowice,” Jabbar Koubaisy, the imam who heads the Doha Centre, told TVN24.

Asked about the size of the Muslim community in Katowice and the wider Silesian metropolitan area, City Hall acknowledged that it does not keep records of places of worship according to denomination, nor does it collect statistics on residents’ religious affiliation. It merely pointed out that two Muslim associations have been active in Katowice for years: the Islamic Culture Centre and the aforementioned Doha Centre for Dialogue and Culture.

Polish politicians have repeatedly reassured the public that there were no plans for mass migration from the Middle East and Africa, as Poland was, they insisted, able to draw on more culturally similar migrants from Ukraine, Belarus and the Caucasian countries.

Poland issued almost 145,000 work permits to foreign nationals in the first half of 2025, according to labour ministry figures, with citizens of Uzbekistan, Bangladesh, Turkey and Turkmenistan among the main recipients. Poland’s Muslim community is expanding as labour migrants arrive in growing numbers, though Muslims still represent just 0.1 to 0.2 per cent of the country’s population.

According to Agata Nalborczyk, a professor at Warsaw University’s Faculty of Asian and African Cultures, there are between 40,000 and 76,000 Muslims living in Poland. They are visible because they work in customer-facing roles such as taxi drivers or food delivery couriers.

Nalborczyk says the new arrivals cannot be treated as a settled minority as they have not so far been able to bring their families with them and are more than likely to treat Poland as a transit country before moving to western Europe where there is much more of a support and benefits structure for that community.

According to polling, public opinion is firmly against Muslim migration into Poland with half saying they would not want Muslims to be Polish citizens, their neighbours or members of their family, placing them behind both Jewish and Roma people as the least accepted ethnic and religious group.

Muslim migration in Poland is opposed by all of Poland’s right with little enthusiasm from the centre and centre-left either. Poles associate Muslims with mass migration to western Europe, a phenomenon bedevilled by illegal migration and reports of the lack of integration by Muslims into western society.

While the number of Muslims remains small in Poland, so does the number of mosques and worship centres, which is limited to nine in major cities and to five working mosques: in Gdańsk, Warsaw and Białystok, and in Kruszyniany and Bohoniki, the villages of the only indigenous Muslim minority in Poland, the Tatars.

There is also relatively little available in terms of halal food in Poland. According to the website Halalfood.pl there are 19 restaurants serving halal food in Poland, 18 of them in Warsaw.

Neither the religious, cultural nor the political infrastructure makes encouraging reading for Muslims moving to Poland. Yet the demands of the labour market mean that such migration is beginning to take place.

brusselssignal

A planned event at the temporary publicly funded “Volksbad” pool in front of Berlin’s Volksbühne theater has been canceled following an alleged surge of online hostility and threats. The initiative, organized in collaboration with the association Each One Teach One (Eoto), was set to reserve the public bath exclusively for Black children and young people for a six-hour window on Friday before opening to the general public.

The organizers are claiming that they could no longer protect participants. According to a statement from the Volksbühne, the event was canceled because the initiative “has become the target of right-wing and racist incitement.”

If we may allow for some editorializing here, this claim is pure propaganda. As much as the fever dreams of the left would like to believe it, KKK members and rabid neo-Nazi extremists are not going to show up to an art project in Berlin and target Black kids.

In short, the organizers got called out for their racist and exclusionary plan, some people complained about it online, and now they need a dramatic pretext to cancel a project that made them look racist.

While the event has been canceled, the theater stands behind the initiative. Lilienthal defended the policy, arguing that the approach aligns with local policy by “implementing Berlin’s anti-discrimination law,” which allows for protected spaces for individuals affected by discrimination.

The question is who gets to define “marginalized groups” and “discrimination.”

For example, there is no doubt that across Germany, young White people are increasingly the target of structural and organized attacks based on their race, especially in the German school system, where they are often a minority. Cases have been exhaustively documented time and time again, yet, it is important to remember that this group would never be permitted to have their own exclusionary swimming day. After all, the dominant ideology governing Germany is that White Germans could never face systematic discrimination. Even commissioning a study to document these incidents would be highly controversial for the left.

🇩🇪🔴 A young German girl spoke of the nightmare she experiences from her Muslim classmates.

"Sometimes they say to me that I’m German. And yeah, then they laugh at me, curse at me and tease me. Others are always Muslim, and they ask me why I am not a Muslim. I said I am a… pic.twitter.com/gggVOm9IPs

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 21, 2025

Eoto, which receives taxpayer money to empower Black people and runs Berlin-Wedding’s Black Communities Center, is also claiming the event was under threat, according to German newspaper Tagesschau. The organization reported receiving “racist threatening emails as well as threats of violence and discriminatory comments on social media” once public outrage began around the event. Consequently, Eoto stated that physical and mental safety for the children “cannot be guaranteed on Friday at the public bath, not even by security forces and police.”

Volksbühne director Matthias Lilienthal confirmed to RBB hat bathing operations will be suspended between 12:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. entirely on Friday. Instead, Lilienthal said he plans to be on-site at noon to engage in open discussions with the public.

🇩🇪🔴 Yara was the last German in her classroom, and she ended up being bullied and stabbed.

Yara was only 6 but was "bullied and ostracized, and in the end even seriously injured."

Yara's father said that parent-teacher meetings required a translator.

"I had the feeling that… pic.twitter.com/KHk1QFYJnA

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) September 16, 2025

Claiming that all Black people face blanket discrimination while implementing an openly discriminatory practice that actually favors them is something the theater should perhaps reflect on. However, Lilienthal’s claim that Berlin’s anti-discrimination policy actually allows for openly discriminatory practices such as this one is open to legal challenges.

Berlin does legally permit and provides taxpayer money to support dedicated spaces for certain racial groups already, such as the Black Communities Center in Wedding. Again, no White “safe space” would ever be permitted.

So, even if this pool initiative is no doubt racist and exclusionary, it could very well be legal under Berlin law but still very open to legal challenges. For example, for typical public events like concerts, club nights, or festivals, the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) applies strictly. In theory, you cannot reject people from a swimming pool based on skin color and suddenly say that “no White people allowed.”

However, under German constitutional law, the freedom of association and assembly allows groups to host focused political workshops, empowerment meetups, or educational panel discussions intended specifically for marginalized groups. These events are legally classified as “targeted empowerment” or educational platforms that compensate for structural disadvantages or create temporary psychological safety.

Again, the definition of a “marginalized group” raises further legal gray areas that can be challenged. In fact, the entire law creates a problematic form of discrimination.

It is also true that certain community groups and organizations have already secured an exclusive time slot, such as the Gangway Crew, which works with homeless people. However, there is so far no record of any other racial group, such as Hispanics or Asians, securing a time slot at the swimming pool exclusively for themselves. The question is also why do only Blacks of all “discriminated” groups receive a time slot?

The leadership of the taxpayer-funded group is doubling down and is likely looking to pursue similar events in the future, despite the threat that evil neo-Nazis may be lurking in the bushes waiting to attack innocent Black children at the first chance.

“We will continue working with Eoto, we will continue our events, and we will also consider an initiative for these children and young people,” Lilienthal noted, confirming that a replacement event is being planned.

In terms of discrimination, Alternative for Germany (AfD) supporters are likely at the top of the charts in Berlin, where even the whiff of supporting the party can lead to job loss, social ostracism, and violent attacks from Antifa. In the major cities of Germany, being associated with the AfD in any manner is an open invitation to violent attacks.

Sure, an AfD-only swimming event supported by taxpayer money is pretty laughable, but in terms of events that might actually be attacked in Berlin, it might be a top candidate. Yes, Antifa might literally be waiting in the bushes.

Meanwhile, taxpayer money will continue to flow to organizations that continue to idolize minorities, with most of them run by very privileged White people. The Volksbühne venue operates on a substantial budget, benefiting from over €20 million in annual public taxpayer subsidies. The pool itself, measuring 25 meters in length and 1.30 meters in depth, can host a maximum capacity of 46 swimmers simultaneously, with the total budget designed to accommodate an estimated 20,000 visitors over the course of the swimming season. Admission may be free but obtaining an online reservation for a spot is highly competitive.

🇩🇪❓"Why don’t you have any German friends?"

🔺"Because they don’t belong to us. I can’t stand the Germans too much."

Thousands of German students now face discrimination and sometimes outright assault from foreigners in their school systems.

Yet, the narrative of the "evil… pic.twitter.com/3EtIdpGpna

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 19, 2025

Maybe in the future Germany can have a swimming day for “battered White kids” in Germany’s multicultural school system, but you shouldn’t hold your breath.

rmx

Financial greed appears to know no bounds when seemingly endless funds flow from the public purse. The ordinary taxpayer is left holding the bag, subsidizing arrangements that defy economic logic and common sense.

Details of this Hamburg asylum scandal emerged from the answer to an inquiry by CDU member of parliament Andreas Grutzeck, which Focus magazine made public, citing a report by the news agency dpa. In 2023, the state of Hamburg paid €7.9 million to acquire one of the Mundsburg high-rise buildings in Hamburg-Nord. The state-owned housing company Fördern & Wohnen has since received an average monthly rent of €1,550 for 56 privately rented apartments in this building. In contrast, another 77 apartments in the same building, which the state of Hamburg uses to house asylum seekers, generated an average monthly rent of €8,510 during the same period.

That price difference—a full five and a half times higher for comparable rental properties—cannot be economically justified. It apparently stems from the fact that some officials in the established political system lose all common sense when it comes to migrant issues. The money does not even go to private landlords; it circulates within the public sector, from the city to its own housing company. This looks less like efficient public service and more like an internal transfer scheme that inflates costs at the expense of citizens who actually pay taxes.

Grutzeck captured the broader damage with justified disillusionment: “The fact is that such cases fuel resentment among the population and accelerate the division of society.” He described the accommodation costs in the Mundsburg Tower as not logically justifiable. He is right.

When a state-owned entity charges the public purse more than five times the market rate it collects from ordinary private tenants for similar units in the identical building, trust erodes. Working families in Hamburg face rising rents, energy costs, and inflation. Many struggle to afford decent housing themselves. Yet the same system that squeezes them funnels extraordinary sums into specialized asylum accommodation that operates under a completely different set of rules.

To put the numbers in perspective, consider the most expensive rental market in the United States. As of July 2026, the average monthly rent for an apartment in Manhattan reached a record $6,655, with the median at approximately $5,295. One-bedroom units averaged around $5,486, while two-bedrooms climbed to about $8,054. These figures reflect one of the tightest, most competitive housing markets on the planet, driven by extreme demand, limited supply, and the unique economic power of New York City.

Convert the Hamburg asylum figure of €8,510 at recent exchange rates and it exceeds $9,000—higher than the average Manhattan rent and competitive with larger or premium units in America’s costliest borough.

Let that sink in. A mid-sized German city is paying, on average, more per apartment for asylum housing in a high-rise it already owns than many New Yorkers pay for market-rate apartments in Manhattan. The private tenants in the same Mundsburg building pay a modest €1,550. The disparity is not the product of superior amenities or location premiums available only to one group. It is the product of a political decision to treat asylum accommodation as a cost-insensitive priority.

This is not an isolated accounting quirk. Total migrant-related housing costs in Hamburg have run into the hundreds of millions of euros annually. Hotel stays alone have absorbed large shares of the budget. The Mundsburg case stands out because the ownership structure makes the inefficiency transparent: the city bought the building, then effectively overpays its own subsidiary to house people there. Critics have noted that Fördern & Wohnen carries substantial debt. Inflated internal rents may help service that debt, but they do so by shifting the burden onto taxpayers who never consented to this premium.

The deeper problem is political and cultural. When policymakers treat certain categories of spending as morally insulated from scrutiny, waste inevitably follows. It also signals to citizens that their contributions can be spent with abandon in one domain while other public services face constraints.

Resentment grows from the sense that the system is rigged against those who fund it. The same system’s legitimacy moreover depends on the fact that public money is sacred. Cases like Mundsburg destroy public trust.

Taxpayers are not an infinite resource. Every euro spent at these elevated rates is a euro unavailable for schools, infrastructure, police, or housing support for low-income residents who have lived in the city for years. Benchmarking against private rents in the same buildings or neighborhoods is a straightforward starting point.

freewestmedia

Nigel Farage has won the Clacton by-election, the vote he has long described as a “people vs Establishment” contest.

Shortly after 6am, Mr Farage was confirmed to have returned to the House of Commons.

He secured 22,239 votes while his closest rival, a satirical candidate named Count Binface, received 9,455.

The total turnout was 35,111, a decreased vote share of 14.39 per cent.

The other main Westminster parties boycotted the by-election entirely, though Mr Farage could face them in a potential second vote at a later date.

Mr Farage resigned as an MP to trigger the contest at the start of July amid a probe by the parliamentary standards commissioner over a £5million gift he received before becoming an MP.

That probe was paused when he quit, and will now resume. If he receives a severe disciplinary sanction, he will be forced to face voters once again.

The Reform UK leader told GB News in the early hours he had won “very convincingly” over “Establishment candidate” Count Binface.

On social media later on, he said the result in Clacton “speaks for itself”.

But the night was marred by fears of an “organised campaign to degrade and disrupt” the count.

Mr Farage hailed supporters at a Reform-organised “Farage fest” for coming out in force, saying even before the count he had secured more votes than in 2024.

Those pre-count claims turned out to be correct – he beat his 2024 total of 21,225 by 1,014 votes, with a lower turnout than the General Election.

Meanwhile, Count Binface, whose real name is Jon Harvey, secured enough votes to retain his deposit – the only other candidate other than Mr Farage to do so.

Mr Harvey has stood against party leaders such as Andy Burnham, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak in the past.

But he did not stand next to Mr Farage after Reform UK claimed Essex Police said a “credible threat” had forced him away from the declaration.

Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice told GB News the party’s leader “would have loved” to have been at the count, but “security is paramount”.

Ian Davidson, the acting returning officer, said he was not aware Mr Farage would not be attending the count until he announced it in his speech, and insisted the election process was completed “safely and securely”.

GB News understands that Essex Police, however, did not tell any candidate not to attend the declaration.

Major parties were quick to give their takes on the by-election they did not stand in.

Labour was quick to declare the by-election was “no victory for Nigel Farage” despite not standing a candidate in it.

Party chairwoman Bridget Phillipson echoed her remarks from after polls closed last night, saying the victory “shows he likely has so much more to hide”.

The Liberal Democrats said Nigel Farage had come away from the Clacton by-election “looking daft”.

Kemi Badenoch, in a letter circulated in Clacton this week, said the Conservatives would stand a candidate in a “genuine contest”.

But Reform figures shut down claims there would be a second by-election.

Before the count, a Reform UK source said: “If Nigel Farage wins by more votes tonight than he did in 2024 then his decision to call this by-election against the establishment will be vindicated.”

And Mr Farage said: “Today the voters in Clacton have stuck up two fingers to the entire political establishment.”

gbnews

Outgoing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had formerly headed the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) which had offered a pass to the Muslim sex grooming gangs who had trafficked and raped as many as 250,000 women and girls in the UK.

Starmer had initially refused to launch a national inquiry into the grooming gangs, claiming that they were merely a local matter, before finally giving in to political pressure.

“In a number of cases presented to us, particularly in cases involving groups, there’s clearly an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed,” Starmer awkwardly admitted.

“The CPS, under his leadership, had dropped a case against a rape gang despite overwhelming evidence of their guilt. Following the CPS’s decision to abandon the case, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) dropped its wider investigation into Asian grooming gangs in the area, and the abuse continued,” The Telegraph revealed.

“It’s absolutely vile. How can he stand there and say he did a good job? They had DNA, concrete evidence, and still didn’t get charged with rape,” one of the victims blasted Starmer.

When Starmer finally agreed to a national inquiry into Muslim sex grooming gangs, multiple victims threatened to resign with one of the women warning about a “push to widen the remit of the National Inquiry in ways that downplay the racial and religious motivations behind our abuse”.

When PM Starmer was ousted because the Labour government’s radical policies and the mass invasion by Muslim migrants had made him historically unpopular, he was coincidentally replaced by yet another Labour political figure with connections to the Muslim sex grooming cases.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham had formerly served as the mayor of Greater Manchester, a city with a large Pakistani Muslim population that was at the epicenter of the grooming gangs. After the grooming gang scandal went national, Burnham tried to argue that he had led the way, but in reality had resisted any serious inquiry until the BBC aired the ‘Three Girls’ documentary.

The inquiry that Starmer tried to block had been centered on the Muslim sex grooming gangs in Oldham, in Manchester, where there are now over 1,000 cases being investigated. In Rochdale, also in Greater Manchester, young girls were raped, passed around and trafficked by Muslim men with one victim saying that she had been raped over 100 times since she was 12 years old.

Even though the events dated back to the oughts and there had been trials in 2012, Burnham claimed to have known nothing about it until he watched the 2017 documentary.

“We’d seen the BBC programme The Three Girls, and I acted immediately on it, particularly after I’d heard an interview with Maggie Oliver about a police investigation in Manchester, Operation Augusta, which had been closed down,” Burnham claimed.

But Operation Augusta was a 2004 investigation, and Burnham had served as the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Home Affairs right after Operation Augusta, at a time when victims and their parents were writing to the Home Office clamoring for justice.

Burnham claimed that he only found out about the outrage after the 2017 BBC documentary and an interview with Maggie Oliver, a key police whistleblower, and immediately launched an inquiry that got results. In reality, the inquiry failed to hold anyone in authority accountable and avoided exploring any links to Labour politicians including Rotherham Councilman Jahangir Akhtar, accused by some reports of raping one of the victims, who had achieved political power through Labour’s Baron Nazir Ahmed: who was later convicted of the attempted rape of a girl and of a serious sexual assault upon a boy under 13. His two brothers, both named Mohammed, were charged but not convicted of alleged sexual assaults against a boy under the age of 11 and a boy under the age of 8.

But Burnham had been campaigning based on that inquiry and used it to pave his path to replacing Starmer, claiming that he had gotten results where other politicians had failed to act.

But how did that inquiry really go?

A Burnham promotional timeline boasts that he had “commissioned an independent review into historic child sexual exploitation (CSE) cases in Greater Manchester to be led by nationally recognised independent experts, Malcolm Newsam and Gary Ridgway.” What it does not mention is that the six year inequity by Newsam and Ridgway was stonewalled by the police and local authorities and denied access to documents that might have made the difference.

Burnham had failed to intervene, provide support or stay on the case.

Maggie Oliver, the police whistleblower, recently charged that, “Andy Burnham was very open about talking about the failures of the past which everybody already knew by that time. The fourth part of those inquiries was meant to be an assurance review. That was published last year. That was meant to look at what had happened between 2019 up until 2025. What happened in that, in my experience, was actually a cover-up. It was a paper exercise. What it led to was the resignation of the two independent reviewers who had spent six years scrutinising Greater Manchester Police. Instead HMIC came and they did not speak to a single victim or a single survivor who had been caught in the last seven years of working with Greater Manchester Police.”

“When it comes to leadership and courage and gripping what is going on now, unfortunately he turned away. We missed a huge opportunity to bring changes that are needed,” she said of Burnham.

Burnham complained about what he called the “distasteful politicisation” of the trafficking of young girls and bragged about backing a national inquiry, but his proposed inquiry was only a “limited” one, and in a mayoral question and answer session, he declared, “I 100 per cent will stand by what I’ve done.”

“Greater Manchester did not look in the other direction. We looked directly at this issue, we held a complete mirror up to ourselves,” Burnham falsely claimed. “I see the stuff online and it’s actually designed to create hate, and they’re trying to pull everyone apart.”

When put to the test, Burnham defaulted back to claiming racism and continuing the cover-up. Much as PM Keir Starmer had before him.

What are the odds that the last two prime ministers of the UK were both in a position of power to cover up the Muslim sex grooming gangs? But some might say that’s why they were chosen.

The seemingly improbable coincidence of PM Keir Starmer and PM Andy Burnham both being in positions that allowed them to have knowledge of the depredations of the Muslim sex grooming gangs, to do nothing about them, to play ‘reformers,’ and to fail to tackle the institutional corruption, testifies to how embedded the gangs were in the circles of political power, especially in Labour which is heavily dependent on Pakistani Muslim bloc votes.

Did covering up the crimes of the Muslim sex grooming gangs put Starmer and Burnham on a path to power? There is no way to know for sure, but the coincidence is too much to ignore.

frontpagemag

by Olivia Murray 

While the left continues to focus on a system of slavery that died more than 150 years ago, we’ve got their political allies enslaving underage girls for sex.

According to a new report at RAIR Foundation USA by Vlad Tepes, a 15-year-old Muslim boy living in Austria, the child of Iraqi refugees, took a 14-year-old non-Muslim girl as a sex slave, “forcing conversion, the hijab, and repeated rape while invoking Allah’s name to threaten death.” When she tried to “resist” him and leave? According to digital chat records published by a local paper, he swore, “By Allah, I will kill you” and “You whore, I will kill you.” While the boy denies any abuse and rape, law enforcement found visible blood splatter on a wall, which the girl alleges got there during the last rape. Is anyone shocked? I’m certainly not. 

And, this is just what I’m inferring since the RAIR report makes no mention of this detail, but this was all presumably happening with full knowledge of his parents, and in their presence. Where else does a 15-year-old kid live except at home?

To be fair, vicious subjugation of women and forced sex are culturally acceptable in the Islamic world, so maybe he’s being honest? I mean, this is what they’ve been doing for the last 1,400 years, since their ideology’s founder established the “religion” in the 7th century, himself taking a young girl sex slave as “wife.” (Poor little Aisha.)

A 9-year-old girl is sold by her own family into sexual slavery and forced to marry a 70-year-old man.

This is the reality of millions of Muslim girls! Where is the outrage? pic.twitter.com/w6MWlpWJsI

— Dr. Maalouf ‏ (@realMaalouf) August 7, 2026

Yet, that doesn’t mean the boy should be exempt from Western consequences and justice (in the truest sense of the word, not the progressive version we see everywhere now), and it does mean these people have absolutely zero right to live in our world.

Emigration from the Muslim world has to be completely abolished, and third world foreigners (especially the Islamist ones) in the West need to be denaturalized and repatriated. Do we have the national appetite and will to do what needs to be done? Even if it means we have to hurt some feelings?

americanthinker

Bishop Marian Eleganti, in an interview published Thursday, said that Islam cannot be integrated into our Western political systems, which the Christian faith has shaped.

During the interview with La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, published on August 13, the auxiliary bishop emeritus of Chur, Switzerland, emphasized that it’s impossible for Islam to be integrated into the Western world, which holds Christian foundations. The bishop further highlighted the “anti-Christian” agenda of both Islamists and modernism and the dangers of mass migration into Europe.

“Personally, I am convinced that Islam cannot be integrated into our political systems, which have been shaped by Christianity,” Bishop Eleganti said during the interview.

“There is no such thing as an apolitical Islam, one of purely internal religious devotion. It is a system of domination. And the more its followers are convinced of this, the less it can be integrated. The result is parallel worlds,” he added.

lifesitenews

Socialist councilors at the Spanish town of Albanchez de Mágina decoupled the town’s annual celebrations from their Patron saint’s festivities in what politicians and the town’s residents are denouncing as an attack against their Christian faith.

For over four centuries, Albanchez de Mágina, a small agricultural town with roughly 900 residents located in the province of Jaén, Andalusia, holds an annual series of Catholic festivities and events between May 3-6 to honor their Patron, Saint Francis of Paola. Every May 3, the town holds a night-time Procession of the Rosary of the Torches — which precedes the festivities’ main event.

Due to its historic significance, the town observes May 4 as a local holiday.

The traditional festivities, whose early May schedule remained invariable through time, were modified this week by an absolute majority of local councilors from the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE). Effective 2027, the modifications brought forward the historically observed May 4 holiday to April 30, separating the holiday from the broader Saint Francis of Paola early May festivities.

The Spanish center-right People’s Party (PP) denounced on Wednesday that the PSOE councilors’s actions “effectively eliminated” the Patron Saint Festivities of Saint Francis of Paola. PP’s local spokesperson, Mario León, condemned PSOE’s decision as a “unilateral, authoritarian, and without consensus,” affirming that the socialists’ plan has the intention of “decoupling the festivities from the Christian faith and inventing a secular holiday weekend.”

According to the PP party, the change, which León pointed out has been in the works since 2025, was not consulted to the town’s opposition councillors or even the Brotherhood of Saint Francis of Paola. León stressed that neither the party’s local members nor the town’s residents agree with the change. As such, the spokesperson, speaking on behalf of the People’s Party, is demanding that the mayor of Albanchez de Mágina rectifies the situation and restores the holiday to its original and traditional date.

“The Socialist Party’s desire to move it to April 30th and completely separate it from the religious events is solely aimed at severing the festivities from the Christian faith and inventing a weekend of secular holiday,” León wrote, and argued that the change renders May 4 into a regular working day — an act that, he asserted, prevents workers and teachers from celebrating their faith on that day.

“That is the day [May 4] that corresponds to it by history, tradition and faith, and we request that traditions not be politically instrumentalized for political purposes,” León said.

Failure to do so, the Popular Party emphasized, will see the party do “everything necessary and knock on every door” to ensure that PSOE “does not take away our traditions, trample on our faith, and once again set the local festivities around May 4.”

The Spanish newspaper ABC reports that local Albanchez de Mágina residents have rallied against the recent actions of the socialist councilors.

Per the newspaper, a citizens’ group of about 350 members recently formed in the town with the expressed goal of upholding their town’s traditions. The group reportedly denounced to ABC on Thursday that the socialist councilors unilaterally went ahead with the change despite numerous conversations held over the past year on the matter. Another local citizens group is reportedly preparing a motion seeking to annul the holiday change.

breitbart

Volunteer clowns in red noses and dungarees have been performing for queues of migrants at a squalid camp near Dunkirk, metres from the tents of Kurdish people-smugglers organising the next Channel crossings.

UK newspaper The Telegraph reported that at Loon-Plage, an encampment in the industrial zone west of Dunkirk in northern France where around 2,500 people wait for passage to the UK, Dutch former Philips manager Laurence Quetel, 67, and her juggling troupe from the aid group Salam Nord have been trying to lift spirits with mime, high-fives and slapstick.

In collaboration with Salam Nord, a Calais and Dunkirk relief organisation that provides free food, she and her two fellow clowns, Anne and Jeroen, have spent a week at Loon-Plage.

Salam Nord/Pas-de-Calais was set up after the French government closed the Red Cross centre at Sangatte in November 2002 and now prepares hot meals for camps around Dunkirk, according to the charity.

The performances, which also included helping prepare free hot lunches, largely met with bemusement rather than smiles.

Fifty metres away, smuggling gangs operate openly, selling cigarettes and phone-charging services while plotting launches.

Migrants are dispatched each morning to a hypermarket some 2.7km away and return with trolleys of ingredients for the gangs’ makeshift kitchens, the newspaper reported.

Their latest method involves 15-metre “mega dinghies” capable of carrying up to 230 people in a single crossing, vessels that Quetel described as a “necessary evil”.

“My first feeling was, I was happy that 230 people arrived in one batch without people dying… The second was s—, how can they put them on there,” she said, noting that women and children are often packed into the middle of the overloaded boats.

“And you hear so many horrible stories, you have women and their kids who are separated from their husbands,” the former manager at the Dutch electrical group Philips told The Telegraph.

“So no, I am not happy with those big boats but if they did not have a big boat they could not go anywhere,” she added.

A dinghy carrying 230 people, more than 20 of them children, reached Dover on August 10 in the largest single-boat crossing yet recorded, the French sea rescue service SNSM said.

About 30 of those trying to board fell into the water off the French coast the previous evening, according to the same account.

Home Office figures show 14,526 people arrived in the UK by small boat between January 1 and August 2, 43 per cent fewer than at the same point in 2025.

The 2,316 arrivals recorded in July came on 32 boats, an average of 72 people per vessel and the highest monthly average since the data series began in 2018.

A Home Office spokesperson condemned the “reckless and dangerous tactics” used by the gangs behind the crossings.

Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said French officers could have stopped a vessel of that size in shallow water and criticised the £660 million (€760 million) Britain is paying Paris to police its coast.

Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, detected some 9,900 attempts to leave the EU for the UK across the Channel between January and April, close to half the number a year earlier, while irregular crossings into the bloc fell 37 per cent over the first half of 2026.

Quetel started performing for migrants under the stage name Clown Holalal during the exodus of Syrian refugees in 2016.

She founded her company Inside Clown in 2012 after training as a hospital clown in the Netherlands and has since worked in migrant camps in Greece, Jordan and Lebanon.

She said: “When I am here, I take a ball and I look at another pair of eyes, I suddenly know there is a communication where I can throw the ball, they take the ball and then I see the human being as an individual. This is a human thing and this is a beautiful thing to see.”

Loon-Plage is largely controlled by criminal gangs and is divided between a section for migrants and aid workers and one for smugglers.

It is infested with rats and there are mounds of rubbish.

There are many incidents of violence, with turf wars between Kurdish and Afghan people-smuggling gangs that include several shootings.

A man in his thirties was shot seven times at the camp on July 28, 2025, a month after a double shooting left two people dead and six wounded, among them a woman and a two-year-old child.

The gangs let aid agencies hand out food, medication, washing facilities and life jackets, and in return expect volunteers to overlook their operations, a well-placed Kurdish source told the newspaper.

brusselssignal