Germany’s Verena Brunschweiger, a self-described “radical feminist,” is promoting the slogan: “My lineage ends with me.” She says she hopes to encourage people, especially White people, to stop having children.
She claims that Western pro-natalists only want to “control women, and keep refugees out.”
The article on her views, from Australian broadcaster news.com.au, is entitled: “‘My bloodline ends with me’: Why feminist ‘childfree icon’ wants fewer ‘white babies’ and more refugees”
The report quoted her as saying: “We have a proud slogan, ‘My bloodline ends with me.’ I think this is a responsible choice.”
Brunschweiger said that Europeans are to blame for the poor quality of life in Africa, and she would invite the entire world to Europe.
🇩🇪German feminist Verena Brunschweiger promotes the slogan “My lineage ends with me.”
She calls for people, especially White people, to stop having children.
She claims that Western pro-natalists only want to “control women, and keep refugees out."
“So I would take all immigrants and refugees in because we ruined the world, so to speak.”
“We produce the climate change which makes life in Africa, for instance, miserable and horrible. So of course, why not invite [them] if they want to come?”
She said that in her home country, “populist nonsense” is being promoted by the German party Alternative for Germany (AfD).
She claimed the party wants Germans to have more babies so “they can say, ‘Oh, I’m sorry, dear refugees, go back and drown or die or starve or whatever, because we have so many of our own people and we have to care for them first.”
“They say we need our own kids because German white kids are better than other kids who immigrate into the country,” she added.
“All the white people go, ‘Wouldn’t it be so horrible if we lost the white people, the white majority?’ They always want white women to have more babies to in order to be able to say, ‘Oh, stay the way we are, we are already full,’” she added.
She says Western countries have a moral duty to accept refugees.
“Because we produce all the climate change and all those things which make them leave [their] country,” she said.
Despite immigrants producing children at a much higher rate than White people, especially African migrants, she dismisses any argument against restricting immigration.
She said that she “of course” targets Whites specifically to stop having children.
“My focus, and that’s what drives the AfD nuts, is we have to cut back our numbers,” she said.
A 29-year-old asylum seeker living in Alkmaar is facing prosecution for the alleged rape of a 13-year-old Dutch girl. During court proceedings the man reportedly suggested marrying his victim as a way to resolve the matter.
The suspect, identified as T.N., is accused of attacking the girl last year.
According to the Public Prosecution Service, the vulnerable 13-year-old had run away from home and was looking for a place to sleep when she came into contact with the man near the Bolwerk area.
Prosecutors described it as “a very serious sexual offence” and are demanding a four-year prison sentence.
DNA evidence, including sperm matching the suspect, has been found.
In court, T.N. gave a remarkable explanation for the DNA, claiming it could have come from the girl touching his finger. He reportedly questioned why the court would believe a 13-year-old, claiming she did not know anything and didn’t understand sex.
At the end of the hearing, the defendant said he was sorry. “If I can make amends, I want to do so. I do want to marry her,” he said.
The girl’s mother confronted him directly during the hearing, asking why he had done this to her daughter and damaged their lives instead of seeking help for his own problems.
The victim is demanding €12,000 in compensation and has reportedly suffered a psychosis as a result of the alleged assault, for which she needs medication.
The court has ordered comprehensive psychological and psychiatric evaluations of the suspect, with the next pro forma hearing scheduled for December.
Local councillors have called for an emergency debate, centring not only on the alleged crime itself but also on the role and management of the city’s asylum centre.
There are highly critical for the fact that the council only learned about the case through the media rather than from the mayor. They want clarity on what the local authorities knew, when they knew it, and why the information was not shared earlier.
Questions are being raised about supervision of residents, integration standards, and the safety of young people in the area.
This is not the first time such incidents have exposed tensions in Dutch cities.
Repeated cases involving asylum seekers and vulnerable minors have fuelled criticism that current policies prioritise accommodation over rigorous screening, integration requirements, and the protection of Dutch children in their own neighbourhoods.
Around 1,000 people marched through the southern French city of Narbonne on Sunday, June 28th, following the death of 17-year-old Louis, who was lynched by a gang of youths.
The march, organised under the slogan ‘Justice for All,’ was promoted on social media by several identitarian groups. Louis’s family declined to take part, saying they wished to avoid any political exploitation of their son’s death.
The demonstration reflects growing public concern over youth violence in France.
Louis was attacked ten days ago after allegedly being lured to a construction site in Narbonne by a group of boys—aged between 16 and 19—he knew through child welfare services. He was discovered unconscious the following day by a worker and died in hospital four days later.
In an emotional interview, his mother called for those responsible to be tried as adults, saying she hoped her son’s death would be “the last.”
Investigators believe the assault was a carefully planned ambush.
Five suspects—Jordan S., Lucas P., Mathias T., Isaac P., and Kilian T.—have been arrested, charged with murder, and remanded in custody. The attackers filmed the beating and shared footage on social media, enabling detectives to identify those involved quickly.
The widely circulated video shocked France. Narbonne’s deputy police commissioner described the attack as an act of “rare violence.”
During questioning, some of the suspects claimed the assault was motivated by revenge for alleged incidents dating back several years, including accusations of bullying by Louis, and violence suffered by the sister of one of the suspects. These claims remain unsubstantiated.
Authorities have also confirmed that Louis had previously reported being assaulted on two separate occasions in the weeks before his death.
While many social media users have linked the rise in violence to the growing number of migrants in France, prosecutors have stated that there is no evidence the killing was racially motivated.
Press and social media reports differ on whether the assailants were indeed of immigrant extraction. However, it is understandable that angry French citizens, aware of what mass migration and the emergence of parallel societies has done to their country, immediately connected the case with rising immigrant youth violence.
The temperature is rising, and under the blazing sun of Western indifference, the Islamic persecution of Christians is unfolding.
“By the grace of Almighty Allah, the soldiers of the Caliphate raided the village, killing the Christians.”
12 Christians killed and a church set on fire in another attack on a Christian community in Adamawa State, Nigeria.Then another 20 Christians killed (including a pregnant woman and a priest) in Nigeria. A total of 39 Christians murdered in just a few hours.
From 2009 to 2026, 128,750 Christians killed in Nigeria alone. In a single diocese, 217 churches razed to the ground.Another 60 Christians killed in Congo by the Islamic State.More Christians slaughtered in Congo while invoking the name of Jesus.In Uganda, hands are cut off from those who convert to Christianity.
In Mozambique, Islamic State terrorists burst into the parish of St. Louis de Montfort, destroying everything they found: 20 Christians killed, two churches razed.A bishop in Mozambique was also murdered.
And this is just the last few weeks.
New digital catacombs: Christians massacred and the news buried.
As in Dostoevsky or Conrad: but the heart of darkness is not in a distant jungle – it is in the nave of an African church. Their disappearance is embarrassing. Because it does not fit the dominant narrative. The burned churches of Nigeria sink into total media anti-Israel oblivion.
And perhaps this, in the end, is the most terrible thing: not the hatred itself, but the secret hierarchy of suffering imposed by our woke era.
Meanwhile Pope Prevost was concluding his African trip to return within the walls built by another Leo to protect the Vatican from Islamic incursions.
In Italian parishes they pray to Allah, in Iran they keep hanging boys and girls as moharebeh (enemies of Allah) simply for wanting to be free from the Muslim diktat.
In Mali, Al-Qaeda is about to take power and the sister of the President of Ireland boards the flotilla of the mad (and of Hamas).
In France, though, the Socialist Party includes the “fight against Islamophobia” in its government program.
The submission of the West is as visible as the nose on your face.
An investigation has uncovered that approximately 4,300 previously deported migrants were discovered back in Britain during the period from 2021 to 2025.
The findings show 4,614 separate re-entry incidents involving people who had been removed from the country over the five-year span.
More than 720 of these migrants faced deportation on at least two occasions, the data from The Sun reveals.
Albanian nationals represented the largest group among those returning after removal, accounting for over one-third of all cases with 1,525 individuals detected back in Britain.
The Home Office has acknowledged the true figures may be considerably higher, as identification matching is not always possible for every person encountered.
On average, more than two deported migrants re-entered the UK daily during this period.
The financial burden of enforced removals stands at £48,800 per deportation on average during the 2024/25 financial year, dwarfing the £4,300 cost associated with voluntary departures.
Following Albanians in the re-entry statistics were Romanian nationals at 767 cases, with Afghans numbering 281, Lithuanians at 233, and Iraqis accounting for 150 instances.
During the year to March 2025, authorities recorded 26,388 voluntary returns alongside 8,590 enforced removals.
It remains uncertain how many of those encountered after previous deportation are still present in the country.
Since Sir Keir Starmer entered Downing Street in July 2024, more than 76,000 migrants have made the Channel crossing illegally.
Labour’s flagship agreement with France, designed to operate on a reciprocal removal basis, has produced underwhelming results since launching in August 2025.
By June 15 2026, merely 921 migrants had been sent back to France under the arrangement.
The policy encountered difficulties from its inception, with legal challenges in the High Court blocking the removal of asylum seekers.
In a single week between June 15 and 22, 1,912 people reached Britain via small boats.
Despite these outcomes, the government committed an additional £662million to French authorities.
Reform UK Shadow Home Secretary Zia Yusuf condemned the situation in stark terms: “Britain’s borders have become a national joke.
“Thousands of people who were deported from this country have strolled back in, with some being removed and returning more than once.
“The Tories turned Britain into a revolving door for illegal migration, and Labour have no interest in closing it. The British public are now paying the price for decades of incompetence.”
Mr Yusuf pledged his party would “restore control, enforce the law, and ensure that deported means deported.”
A Home Office spokesperson defended the government’s record, stating: “We will not accept any abuse of our borders.
“Individuals who are returned and subsequently attempt to re-enter the UK illegally will be caught and removed.
“Nearly 70,000 individuals have been returned or removed from the UK since the July 2024 election to the end of March 2026 – a 41 per cent increase on the number of returns recorded in the previous 21-month period.”
July 26, 2007 A U.N. registration card, AK-47 assault rifles, ammunition clips and additional military equipment were uncovered during a counter-terrorism operation in southern Gaza. Pictured: U.N. registration card. Israel Defense Forces, CC-BY-2.0, Wikimedia Commons
This story is bigger than Israel. This story is not about Palestinians versus Israelis. This story is not about what drives people to the streets, even when many of them could not find Gaza on a map.
This story is about the fading trust in UN institutions and, even more troubling, in humanitarian work itself.
After October 7, HonestReporting, an Israeli media watchdog, alerted the public to a series of uncomfortable facts. What they discovered was that several Gaza-based ‘freelance photojournalists’ appeared to be operating in close proximity to prominent Hamas leaders and attackers during the assault, or possessed material that raised serious questions about how it had been obtained. The photographers in question were working for or associated with media outlets such as AP, Reuters, NYT, and CNN.
This went beyond a simple ethical concern about someone just “doing their jobs” versus allegedly knowing about the planned massacre ahead of time and/or actively participating in it on the day of the pogrom. The outlets, as expected, denied responsibility and characterized the photographers as independent contributors. At this stage, only Israelis and those closely following the aftermath of the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust seemed troubled by these findings.
However, the story did not end with media workers revealed to be implicated in the October 7 pogrom.
In January 2024, even more uncomfortable claims started to surface. Based on hostage testimonies and Israeli intelligence work, it was reported that at least 12 UNRWA employees actively participated in the October 7 attack. That means active participation in the killings, raping, kidnapping, or the assault’s logistics.
For those unfamiliar with UNRWA, it is a UN agency founded to address the Palestinian refugee crisis. Nothing else but the Palestinian one. While there is a UNHRC whose mission is to help and assist in refugee-related matters, the Palestinians received their own agency. Critics have long argued that this unique arrangement contributes to the perpetuation of the conflict rather than its resolution. But this story is not about UNRWA per se.
The first report was published by Israeli journalist Almog Boker, who was told by a hostage he had been held for nearly 50 days in the attic of a teacher employed by UNRWA. Later on, Emily Damar, a former hostage, reportedly told British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that she had been held in UNRWA facilities. While this was not a claim against a UNRWA employee, it was serious enough for the UN itself to file an investigation.
The UN’s own internal investigation led to the dismissal of nine UNRWA employees for possible involvement in the October 7 attack. It was an unequivocal revelation: a taxpayer-funded humanitarian body had at least seven employees directly implicated in a massacre.
Given this evidence, one might assume these findings would have marked the end of UNRWA under normal circumstances. Close the agency, run an even deeper investigation, and just place Palestinian refugee matters under the same umbrella as every other refugee crisis handled within the UN.
There are several reasons why this would never happen: the most important being that of the world’s refugees, only the Palestinians’ status is inheritable— all others cease to be refugees the moment they are registered in a safe hosting country.
As a result of these revelations, 17 countries, including major donors such as the U.S., Germany, and France, suspended funding to UNRWA in 2023; eventually, all of them but the United States unfroze their funding, and business continues as usual. Somehow, trust was not shattered towards an organization whose paid employees killed people.
Among the largest donors is the European Union—more specifically, the European Commission. On average, the EU funnels €80–90 million a year to UNRWA. Most European taxpayers likely have little idea that their governments help finance the agency.
Would that be too harsh a step, or simply necessary? Let’s test the proposition.
For years, questioning UNRWA was treated like a moral crime. Criticizing governments, armies, or corporations is allowed, but raising concerns or asking questions about the organization handing out aid in Gaza is immediately labeled as propaganda. And yet, the brutal truth is that the more important an organization claims to be, the more it deserves ruthless scrutiny. And UNRWA has failed that test spectacularly.
According to the most recent reports from Washington, federal investigators are now probing at least 1,500 UNRWA-linked individuals for suspected terrorist ties. This is around 12% of the agency’s personnel in Gaza. The number is so significant that this is nothing short of systemic infiltration.
While the fantasy about UNRWA had begun to shatter following the first rounds of allegations, these recent reports from the USAID Office of the Inspector General have, hopefully, made the agency’s legitimacy irreparably damaged. As said, this is not about Gaza or Hamas, or Israel. This is about institutional legitimacy, transparency, and the money being used for terrorist-linked activities.
UNRWA’s leadership has stonewalled the investigations. If there’s nothing to hide, why not cooperate fully?
The scandal exposes the UN’s deeper rot: an institution that shields its failures, protects its insiders, and demands money and deference while delivering neither accountability nor results. The blind trust towards UNRWA is gone.
As Adam Kredo, foreign policy and national security writer,says about the U.S. federal report, while these 1,500 people were not directly participating in the October 7 attack, they are implicated for their links, contacts, membership in terrorist-related activities, and Hamas itself.
The United States designated Hamas as a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 1997. The European Union added Hamas to its terrorist list in 2003. Yet despite decades of international debate, the United Nations has never adopted a universally accepted definition of terrorism.
UNRWA maintains that there is no systemic infiltration within the agency and that only a small number of employees were implicated.
That response raises a simple question:
How many is too many for a humanitarian organization funded by taxpayers around the world?
For European citizens whose taxes help fund UNRWA, even one is too many. Couple that with UNRWA’s reluctance to fully cooperate with investigations, and the trust deficit only grows.
Perhaps Europe should emulate the United States and demand the same level of accountability before writing the next cheque.
If we continue as we are, Britain is set to become an Islamo-Blasphemy regime. So says Benjamin Jones, case director at the Free Speech Union and author of the new book: Island of Strangers – Diversity, Decline and Crisis in Free Speech Buy the book here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Island-Stran… BRITAIN IS BEING TRANSFORMED. IT IS UNFREE. AND IT IS GETTING WORSE. As mass migration reshapes Britain’s population, an increasingly authoritarian state attempts to manage the resulting hyper-diversity by suppressing freedom of speech. We see this in two-tier policing, in attempts to criminalise blasphemy against Islam, and even in the private sector where thousands have lost their jobs or have been punished for expressing their beliefs. In Island of Strangers, Ben Jones – a director of the Free Speech Union – shows how multiculturalism came just as Britain was losing its sense of itself, as Christianity declined, and how its elite embraced a creed of ‘diversityism’. Grounded in a long view of Britain’s history, this book gets to the fundamental causes of why Keir Starmer’s UK feels so unfree. The free speech crisis isn’t just a passing problem. Silencing dissent is now built into how the fractured UK is governed. Different identity groups are increasingly locked in competition to protect their sacred ideas. The most potent challenge to Britain’s tradition of free speech comes from within Islam. This book is unafraid to grapple with these truths. Increasingly it seems impossible even to define who ‘we’ are, much less what we believe or what unites us. Do we really have more in common than that which divides us? Increasingly it feels like we don’t. Taking Keir Starmer’s infamous line, this book argues that Britain has been transformed into ‘an island of strangers’.
We all know the myth – to boil frogs, slowly increase the temperature so they won’t realize it until it’s too late to jump out of the pot and save themselves. This summer, it appears the frogs are starting to feel the heat. Along with the anger at open borders, this may finally presage the end of the green nonsense and the politicians who are destroying their countries by promoting this hogswallop.
Like clockwork, it gets hot in summer in western Europe. And like clockwork, the morons in the European ministries and media blame climate change for their own failure to face reality and make proper provisions for adapting to it. Living in the UK, Germany, and France seems to be like living in a giant HOA run by scientific idiots who exempt themselves from the draconian measures they apply to others as they set about recreating pre-industrial feudal states.
The reports from there are in sharp contrast to the experience of FIFA visitors who saw air conditioning everywhere in the U.S., even in Houston’s very large stadium, so it might be even more damaging to the governments involved.
France
Monique Barbut, Minister for Ecological Transition (yes, there is such a thing there), works in an air-conditioned office. She holds stock in a number of large energy-consuming companies like Airbus. She swatted away questions relating to her failure to ensure air conditioning where it’s most needed with this non-sequitur deflection:
I’m horrified by the people who tell me that all we need to do is put air conditioning everywhere (…) Do you think that’s going to prevent forest fires, the death of animals? That’s not adaptation, it’s an emergency measure.”
French electricity is largely nuclear-generated, so greens are deprived of the economy-killing excuse offered by the UK and German functionaries that they must reduce carbon emissions. (As if air conditioning offered much, if any, increase in carbon emissions. It is far less significant — even if you believed it affected the weather to any meaningful degree — than the output in China. China, by contrast, air conditions much of its urban facilities, its public transportation, and even water mists outside large buildings to cool the ambient air.) In 2003, thousands died in Paris for lack of air conditioning. And because of the nature of most living quarters sans air conditioning, numerous premature deaths occur every time the temperature rises in the summer. Without widespread air conditioning, perishable food will spoil in grocery stores, computers will not work, and public transport will be unendurably hot. Kids are fainting in schools. In one city in southern France, parents got together to pay for some air conditioners. The communist mayor ordered them ripped out because not every school in the city had them. Égalité! Public transport in France generally lacks air conditioning, and the TGV (fast train) from Paris to Nice broke down in a tunnel, resulting in a five-hour delay. Babies fainted in the 122-degree heat aboard the train. The level of bureaucratic idiocy that results in so much death and economic disruption is impossible to ignore.
Council planning officers ordered residents to remove air-con units over fears they produce too much carbon dioxide, stating they should only be used as a “last resort”.
The net zero clampdown is part of building regulations that state “active cooling” should only ever be allowed when all other means of “passive cooling”, such as opening windows or using fans, have been exhausted.[snip] Meanwhile, temperatures are forecast to reach as high as 40C this week, with Britain sweltering under a record heatwave that has forced schools to close, brought trains to a halt and led to the Met Office issuing a red “risk-to-life” warning.
Apparently, the busybody council meddlers require people to justify their need for active cooling. “Air-con engineers told The Telegraph that they had been called out to remove perfectly operational units worth thousands of pounds across London.”
Now, what makes all this even crazier is that all new housing in the UK is required to have heat pumps. As far as I can tell, heat pumps and air conditioners are technically the same — they use the same compression cycle — the heat pump extracts heat from outside and brings it inside, while the air conditioner brings the heat from inside to the outside.
The nitwit energy policies of the UK., including shutting down their North Sea oil production and mandating irregular and insufficient energy sources, meant the country was forced to pay about 17 times normal prices to obtain emergency energy supplies.
Rupert Lowe, who heads the Restore movement in the UK, speaks for me:
With such a debate raging about whether residential air con is a ‘climate responsible’ purchase or not, I want to outline the official Restore Britain position. WE DO NOT CARE.
Germany
For ideological reasons, Germany (and Belgium) stupidly destroyed their nuclear power plants, which it is claimed could have powered air conditioners at full blast all summer with fewer CO2 emissions. Even facilities where common sense demands air conditioning — like hospitals — are deprived of them because placing them in new buildings would create envy in owners of older buildings where there are none. The most shocking story of this green crab pot philosophy is the relatively new hospital in Düsseldorf, which provides care for the most vulnerable heart attack victims who are suffering and probably perishing in this heated, closed atmosphere after builders were denied the right to install cooling systems.
To every criticism for mandating stupid policies, Germany has chosen to flat-out lie to its citizens.
German government to its citizens: portable A/C is “not effective” because the pressure drop sucks hot air into the room, “which heats the room even more”. 🤯 “Here we see the midwit condescension of the European managerial elite in its purest form. First of all, this is all disingenuous. The environment ministry knows full-well that air-conditioners work, they just don’t want people using them because it would strain the German electricity infrastructure — which the environment ministry itself has done a good deal to weaken. Also, if portable AC units don’t work, why have Germans bought 75% more of these machines in the last five years? Why are there literally millions of reviews on Amazon and elsewhere saying “This thing works great! Finally I can sleep through the night!” Why has pretty much nobody ever returned an AC unit, saying “It just made the room hotter!” How stupid do these bureaucrats think Germans are?”
In nearby Austria, the Viennese are replaying the 1940s as informers against those deemed enemies of the state. This time, the “enemies” are those who installed air conditioners.
In the back of many minds is the thought that the leaders of these European states understand full well that the most vulnerable — the elderly poor — are most likely to die from these policies, and that will free up social welfare funds for the hordes of third-world criminals and layabouts they prefer as constituents.
The European Union
Perhaps my favorite example of the feudal structure underlying European energy policies is this from Politico:
The European Commission’s headquarters was forced to shut down its air-conditioning system on Friday due to the heat wave.
Staff working at the Berlaymont building received a text at midday, reading: “BERL — URGENT — Due to extreme weather conditions, forced shut down of air cooling system from floor 1 to 7 for the rest of the day.”
The 13-story building is home to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, her 26 commissioners and about 3,000 staff. Von der Leyen works on the 13th floor, and most of her commissioners’ offices are housed on floors eight or above.
It reminds me of the many laws in feudal Europe which limited the peasants to poor housing, harsh labor, inadequate low-protein nutrition, raggedy clothing, and made it illegal for them to escape.
Some Brits predict it’s only a matter of time before the U.S. military airdrops air conditioners over there.
Sir Sadiq Khan is facing fresh scrutiny over his previous claims about grooming gangs in London after the Met Police identified more than 4,000 potential child sexual exploitation cases that could now be reopened.
The findings, first revealed by The Telegraph, come after Scotland Yard examined around 12,000 reports of alleged child sexual exploitation dating back to 2010.
Roughly one in three cases are now flagged for potential reinvestigation after police or the Crown Prosecution Service previously decided to take no further action.
Sir Sadiq previously insisted there was “no indication” grooming gangs were operating in the capital.
Appearing before the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee in January 2025, the Mayor repeatedly declined to answer questions from Conservative member Susan Hall about the scale of grooming gangs in London.
When asked how many rape gangs were operating in the capital, Sir Sadiq repeatedly asked Ms Hall to clarify what she meant.
At a later committee session, he said: “My understanding from speaking to the police, and she will appreciate, I have done on a regular basis, is and I choose my words carefully for the reasons she will understand there are no reported cases and also no indication of the grooming gangs that she is concerned about in London.”
His comments prompted accusations of a cover-up, with victims claiming the Mayor was “gaslighting” them.
The review follows Baroness Casey’s landmark report into group-based child sexual exploitation, which concluded the criminal justice system had failed victims for decades.
Her recommendations led to the National Crime Agency launching Operation Beaconport, a nationwide review of child sexual exploitation cases that may have been closed prematurely.
The Metropolitan Police has now referred all 4,000 flagged cases to the NCA, which is expected to decide within weeks how many should be formally reopened.
In areas such as South Yorkshire and Greater Manchester, perpetrators in high-profile grooming gang cases have predominantly been Pakistani Muslim men.
However, London’s cases are understood to involve a broader range of offender backgrounds and include intrafamilial abuse, online exploitation and in-person offending.
Ms Hall described the findings as “utterly disgraceful”.
“It has been like getting blood out of a stone,” she said.
The Conservative London Assembly member said the scale of the review should force people to confront the extent of the abuse.
“The resistance I have encountered has been totally unacceptable and when you look at the number of cases being reviewed you have to stop and think that is 4,000 young girls raped and sexually abused and you have to think how dreadful that is.”
A spokesman for Sir Sadiq rejected any suggestion of a cover-up, saying the Mayor had welcomed the review and had “been clear we must leave no stone unturned”.
City Hall also pointed to £2.4million announced last November to fund specialist support services for survivors of child sexual exploitation.
Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has warned the force will require additional officers and resources to carry out any fresh investigations, noting officers already deal with around 2,000 sexual offences every month.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Kevin Southworth urged victims and survivors to come forward, saying they “will be listened to and supported”.
European countries under the unchecked mass migration scourge are endlessly plagued by terrorist attacks from so-called ‘asylum seekers.’
Besides the rapes, stabbing and lynchings, one relentless feature is the weaponizing of motor vehicles – an efficient way to kill and maim the helpless native populations.
Saudi asylum activist Taleb Al Abdulmohsen who self descibed as a 'leftist' has now been convicted and sentenced to life in prison for murdering six people and injuring hundreds more at a Christmas market in Germany in 2024.
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 27, 2026
Also today, in the UK, a Somali migrant has been arrested on ‘suspicion of attempted murder’ after allegedly driving his car against multiple pedestrians.
“Five people were injured, with two being treated at the scene and three taken to hospital after the incident in Ealing Broadway, London just before 2.30pm on Saturday.
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “At this time, it is believed they have all suffered non-life-threatening or life-changing injuries.
‘The car involved did not stop at the scene but was stopped in nearby Grange Park a short time later. The driver, a 34-year-old Somalia-born British man, was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving and attempted murder’.”
A Somalian has been arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving and attempted murder after five pedestrians were injured when a car drove into them in west London this afternoon. pic.twitter.com/lGbedye2i7
— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 27, 2026
As for the potential motive, so far, the incident is not being treated as terrorism.
It’s just another non-assimilating ‘UK citizen’, right?
“Road closures are in place in the area and could remain in place for some time while the police investigation progresses.
[…] A London Ambulance Service spokesperson said it dispatched ‘a number of resources including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars, a volunteer emergency responder crew and an incident response officer to the scene’.”
