Allah's Willing Executioners

A German theologian has called on the Catholic Church to allow the ordination of both homosexual men and women.

In an essay for the latest issue of Herder Korrespondenz, Matthias Remenyi, who teaches who teaches fundamental theology and comparative religious studies at the Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany, argued that restricting the sacrament of Holy Orders to heterosexual men is “erroneous” and “toxic.”

He claimed the arguments against it would no longer be valid, stating: “It is no longer a question of theological knowledge, but rather of the reception of knowledge that guides action. It is no longer about which argument is better. It is about control over the discourse and power.”

“What are we to make of a sacramental sign – be it the masculinity or the heteronormativity of the ordained person – that is not only no longer understood by the majority of people but is also perceived as discriminatory?” the theologian asked.

He said he was not convinced by the magisterial text that rejects the charge of discrimination.

“Who could in all seriousness claim that a gay man is incapable of forming healthy relationships with men and women?” he asked, citing one of the reasons given for the ban on ordaining men with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.

He argued the theology behind these arguments promotes hypocrisy and double standards, “because, quite rightly and for good reasons, a large number of gay men are ordained, and a significant portion of our clergy is, of course, gay.”

Remenyi also called for female ordinations, claiming there were not sufficient theological reasons to deny women Holy Orders.

“Unfortunately, one must also apply the label ‘toxic’ to large parts of the misogynistic theological tradition that remains influential to this day, particularly with regard to the sexualized gender metaphysics that remains virulent beneath the surface and the associated patriarchal image of God,” he stated.

In an instruction from 2005, signed by Pope Benedict XVI, the Congregation for Catholic Education reiterated the Church’s position that men with “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” cannot be admitted to seminary or Holy Orders. 

The instruction states that “this Dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called ‘gay culture.’” 

“Such persons, in fact, find themselves in a situation that gravely hinders them from relating correctly to men and women,” the instruction continues. “One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.” 

In the case of homosexual tendencies that are “only the expression of a transitory problem,” such as “of an adolescence not yet superseded,” the document states that “such tendencies must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate.”

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, reiterating perennial Church teaching that homosexual acts are gravely sinful, states that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law” and “acts of grave depravity.”

Abuse reports have shown that around 80 percent of sexual abuse victims of Catholic priests have been adolescent boys, indicating that the vast majority of abusers had pederastic and/or pedophilic tendencies.

German theologians have been trying to get the Church to change its doctrine on homosexuality for years. Amid the German Synodal Way, more than two-thirds of the nation’s bishops voted in favor of a document calling homosexual acts “not sinful” and “not intrinsically evil.”

Regarding the teaching that only men may receive Holy Orders, Pope John Paul II affirmed the Church’s perennial teaching in his 1994 apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. He wrote: “I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.”

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, then-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, reiterated in a Responsum ad Dubium in 1995 that the teaching laid out in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis is to be “held definitively” and “understood as belonging to the deposit of faith.”

lifesitenews

What happened in Poland on the night of October 30-31 represents an eloquent case study for both facets of the intractable conflict—a concept theorised by political psychologists such as Daniel Bar-Tal since the late 1990s—confronting postmodern society.

On one hand, it is a perfect example of the modus operandi of the wolves in sheep’s clothing who (still) make up the current political establishment in most states of the Western world. A textbook attempt at a coup d’état, executed perfectly up to a certain point.

Once in positions of power, this is what all these individuals with dictatorial and even sociopathic tendencies and ambitions do. With pathological hypocrisy, they attempt to overturn the constitutional order and alter the entire legislative framework to consolidate and perpetuate their power. Far removed from the power of the people, which is the only power that should matter in a democracy.

Why speak of hypocrisy? Because while meticulously pursuing their anti-democratic agenda, they pose as “defenders of the rule of law”—whatever that may mean, since a concrete, precise and universally accepted definition of this concept does not yet exist. It is considered an “essentially contested concept”, a term coined by British philosopher WB Gallie in 1956. This is precisely why everyone uses it as they see fit.

In our case, Prime Minister Donald Tusk attempted to forcefully impose a favourable majority within the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, aiming to ease his path ahead of the 2027 parliamentary elections. Defying the law, defying the Constitution, defying the President—the exact same sins he so serenely imputes to his conservative political adversaries.

These are the exact “arguments” weaponised by the European Commission, which applied a blatant double standard to the previous Polish government, as a pretext to cut off Poland’s access to European funds. Except that the bureaucrats in Brussels were wrong in the case of the Law and Justice (PiS) administration. Refusing to accept hordes of illegal migrants into your country is neither unconstitutional nor against the “rule of law”. Nor is protecting your own economy, your own citizens and your own professional sectors instead of those imposed by Brussels. In February 2024, barely two months after Tusk took office, the Commission announced it would unblock up to €137 billion in EU funds for Poland.

Now, though, we are genuinely dealing with a subversion of the Polish State by its own government. Through an “occupy-style” action, taking advantage of President Karol Nawrocki’s brief window away from Poland, Prime Minister Tusk sent his self-proclaimed “constitutional judges” to basically break into the Constitutional Tribunal. Following a meticulously premeditated plan, they attempted to unlawfully depose the rightful judges of this institution who are not to the liking of the current power in Warsaw. On the evening of October 30, the Tribunal’s longest-serving judge, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, announced she had suspended its president, Bogdan Święczkowski, and taken charge of the court.

On the other hand, the course of events proved that Poland has a true president, devoted to the nation: Karol Nawrocki. Midway through his flight to Senegal, the President turned his plane around and marched straight to the steps of the Constitutional Tribunal. Despite initial opposition from the police forces deployed there in an underworld fashion, the President entered the Tribunal and “turned on the lights”, as we like to say. Thus, the tension was defused for the moment.

By refusing to swear in the disputed judges, the Polish President did not overstep his bounds; rather, he exercised a vital constitutional veto, utilising the presidency as an indispensable mechanism of checks and balances to prevent the packing of the highest court.

Meeting the moment, hundreds of Varsovians took to the streets to defend their Constitutional Tribunal and their President. Once again, Poland resisted.

The conflict, though, remains. For the “Long March Through the Institutions” will never stop, will it? This is the core tenet woven into the globalist, neo-Marxist worldview. Their underlying gospel. Everything old is bad, obsolete, must be deconstructed, broken into tiny pieces, and rearranged, because only what is new is good. Perennial, millennial values must be transformed into mere ephemeral social constructs.

Yet, in practical terms, the Long March (a slogan popularised by German student leader Rudi Dutschke in the late 1960s) and the cultural hegemony imagined by all neo-Marxist ideologues, starting with Antonio Gramsci, will only succeed if they meet no resistance. Only if the majority remains silent. Indeed, a lack of reaction, passivity and the ignorance of the many are assiduously promoted in the public arena throughout the Western world, rising to the rank of a social—societal—norm.

In countries like Romania, this phenomenon has already reached its peak, starting with the lack of public reaction towards the cancellation of the 2024 presidential elections and continuing with the election, in 2025, of a coat-hanger president, unfit from every point of view for the role of “head of state”. Countries like Bulgaria, for instance, which for decades sat somewhat in Romania’s shadow, have gained at least a moral ascendancy of honour by changing their political establishment.

To reiterate: Poland continues to resist, as it has throughout history. It is no wonder its President was once a champion.

At the same time, by persisting in this reckless and desperate endeavour, Donald Tusk will lose the elections long before the ballot boxes even open.

It is not only the Poles who will vote in 2027. The French will choose their president. Argentina will hold concurrent parliamentary and presidential elections. The Italians will elect a new parliament, as will the Greeks, Slovaks, Finns, Swiss and Estonians, among others. In many of these nations, conservatives and patriots are leading the opinion polls.

In his work Intractable Conflicts: Socio-Psychological Foundations and Dynamics (2013), Bar-Tal structured the stages of the full cycle of an intractable conflict as follows:

Outbreak—basically, an older misunderstanding emerges from latency and transforms into an open conflict between two camps.

Escalation—this is the longest and most destructive stage, where confrontation becomes central and hatred takes hold of societal life.

De-escalation—tired and exhausted, the factions become less aggressive and more open to dialogue and reconciliation.

Reconciliation—the final, most profound and lasting stage. The parties gradually abandon the ethos of conflict and, over time, learn to trust one another again and cooperate for a shared future.

After entire decades of being stuck in the second stage (roughly, since the 1960s), perhaps we are finally ready to enter the third stage. Perhaps the era of fools is waning, unelected bureaucrats will no longer rule, people will freely vote for their elected officials, and our societies will reconcile. Socio-psychologically speaking, this is the hardest part. But we must hope. On the night of October 30, Poland resisted. Perhaps European civilisation will resist too. And with it, the entire West as we know it.

brusselssignal

by W. Galt

Pedro Sánchez used to present himself abroad as a modern social democrat, a European progressive committed to climate action, gender equality, and multilateralism. That image was carefully cultivated. The reality of his government in Spain is quite different: a systematic weakening of democratic checks and balances, alliances with parties that serve as the political arm of a terrorist organization, governing agreements with communists, parliamentary deals with separatist parties that have betrayed Spain, a foreign policy subservient to Morocco’s interests, and an increasingly authoritarian style of government resembling the institutional capture practiced by Chavista regimes in Latin America. What is at stake is not simply left-wing policy. It is the transformation of a constitutional democracy into a system in which the law is bent to ensure one man’s survival in power—a regime change from liberal democracy to Bolivarian dictatorship.

Years ago, I warned my fellow Spaniards that Sánchez was following the same iter criminis—the sequence of steps leading to a crime—that Hugo Chávez had followed in Venezuela. In my articles, I called him “Hugo Sánchez.” Spaniards who read my columns at latribunadelpaisvasco.com thought I was exaggerating. Today, they are horrified to see how accurate my predictions have proved to be.

Sánchez became secretary-general of the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) through a primary election in which, I contend, he committed fraud. Once he had secured control of his party, he reached La Moncloa, the Spanish prime minister’s official residence, in 2018 through a vote of no confidence based on falsehoods. Once in power, he could have chosen a coalition with a centrist party or with a communist party. He chose the communists and the political arm of a terrorist organization as his partners.

His survival in office has depended on successive agreements with forces that reject the constitutional order. The most serious is his relationship with EH Bildu, which I regard as ETA’s political arm. Its predecessor political movement had been outlawed until, in my view, former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero pressured the Constitutional Court to allow its legalization. Sánchez’s government has progressively normalized Bildu and facilitated the release of hundreds of terrorists convicted of blood crimes.

The second pillar of his political survival has been the Catalan separatist parties. The amnesty law benefiting those responsible for the illegal 2017 independence referendum and related offenses was not an act of national reconciliation. It was the explicit price of seven parliamentary votes needed to keep Sánchez in power.

Spain’s relationship with Morocco under Sánchez has been marked by previously unthinkable concessions. The first was his abrupt reversal of Spain’s traditional position on Western Sahara, effectively supporting Morocco’s annexation of the territory. His government’s acquiescence in, and assistance with, what I consider Morocco’s recent invasion of Ceuta marks another milestone in this submission. Along the way have come repeated concessions within the European Union allowing Moroccan products to enter European markets to the detriment of Spanish farmers and fishermen. I have no doubt that Sánchez and certain ministers are being blackmailed by Morocco following the compromise of their mobile phones. In my view, the extent of these concessions suggests that they have something criminal and deeply embarrassing to conceal.

But Sánchez is not content merely to betray Spain. He wants to turn it into a submissive nation. To achieve this, as I have argued, he has copied the modus operandi, the iter criminis, employed by Hugo Chávez in Venezuela twenty years earlier—a process that transformed Venezuela into a dictatorship presiding over an impoverished population.

The method of transforming a democracy into a dictatorship is no longer the brutal military coup of decades past. It is subtler and therefore more effective. It can be summarized in several stages: permanent moral polarization, institutional colonization, violations of the law enabled by politicized courts, control of the public narrative through the media, alliances with anti-system forces, and the normalization of exceptional measures.

This process does not require suspending elections or shutting down Parliament. It is enough to hollow out the institutions designed to restrain executive power, buy political support with public resources—I have always maintained that buying votes with taxpayers’ money is the most extreme form of corruption—and keep a sufficiently large segment of the population mobilized by fear of “fascism.” The result resembles the Bolivarian regimes more than a traditional European democracy.

Spain’s next general election is scheduled for November 29. Sánchez has framed it in an atmosphere of hostility, encouraging the left to stage massive and violent demonstrations in the French style—violence organized from within the state itself. He approaches these elections amid what I regard as an attempted electoral fraud, having granted Spanish nationality through the back door, contrary to the proper legal criteria, to hundreds of thousands of South Americans supposedly descended from exiles of the Spanish Civil War. In my view, this is an attempt to manipulate the election by arbitrarily altering the electoral register.

November 29 may be Spain’s last chance to avoid becoming another Venezuela in the heart of Europe. If Sánchez succeeds in forming another government, the West may have to say goodbye to yet another democracy and contend instead with an impoverished country that has become complicit in everything the West should oppose: twenty-first-century socialism and Islamist terrorism. Sánchez’s complicity with Hamas, in my opinion, is evident.

It all began with the March 11, 2004 terrorist attacks, when bombs exploded aboard several commuter trains in Madrid, killing nearly two hundred people and injuring more than a thousand.

I believe the truth was concealed by elements of Spain’s deep state. Many of us suspect that ETA supplied the explosives and logistics, while Morocco provided the scapegoats, making what we believe was a coup d’état appear to be an Islamist terrorist attack designed to damage the governing People’s Party (PP), which had been expected to win the election according to the polls. Within three days, the massacre produced an electoral reversal that brought José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to power.

That, in my view, was where everything began: the betrayal of the United States and the West, the alliance with ETA, the PSOE’s drift toward extreme socialism and its alliance with communists, and the first steps toward turning Spain into a twenty-first-century socialist dictatorship.

Nor should the American intelligence services escape responsibility in this matter. They have never used whatever information they possess to help Spain uncover the truth and establish what really lay behind what I regard as that coup d’état. Neither, in my opinion, are the CIA and other agencies blameless today, when I believe they possess information about Sánchez yet do nothing to assist a Western democracy in danger. Many of us would like to know why.

I hope these lines have opened your eyes to the risks that the United States also faces. If Americans do not want to see their country become another nation drifting toward twenty-first-century socialism, the lesson is right before their eyes. Voting for today’s Democrat party means voting for the same socialism that we are suffering under in Spain.

americanthinker

A sex offender convicted of multiple offenses is set to qualify for parole, suggesting he may be released from the women’s prison where he has been held, a new report reveals. Benjamin Charles Jones, who previously used the name “Lisa Jones,” but is now referring to himself as “Willow,” had only been released from a women’s prison one month prior to being arrested for the latest sexual offense.

In October 2024, Jones grabbed a 31-year-old woman as she walked past St. Mary’s cathedral in central Sydney. CCTV footage recorded the attack as Jones pulled her by her waist into a hidden corner. When she demanded to be let go, Jones replied, “I want to f–k you. Just let me f–k you.”

As the woman struggled to thwart the attack, Jones pulled down his pants and attempted to force an object into her mouth to silence her. When she was finally able to break free, she ran towards bystanders who helped her flag down a police car. After a brief search, law enforcement arrested Jones.

Newly released CCTV footage recorded the night of the assault shows Jones following the victim for approximately 20 minutes, and even running on occasion to keep up with her.

According to courtroom reports from the Sydney Morning Herald, Jones was recently diagnosed with schizophrenia. He reportedly told a psychiatrist that he lived in an “astral world,” and that the devil had made a bargain with his “sex spirit,” and forced him to “engage in sex rituals.”

But when Jones was standing before the court, he reportedly exclaimed, “I identify as transgender and queer… I had nothing to do with it.”

The woman shared the effect of the “unprecedented, unexpected, and aggressive act” in a victim impact statement she read to the court. “The experience permanently made me more aware of a risk in public spaces and more cautious in situations where I previously felt at ease,” she said.

AUSTRALIA: A transgender serial sex offender has been jailed after attempting to rape a woman in Sydney.

Benjamin "Lisa" Jones committed the attack just weeks after being released from a women's prison where he was serving a sentence for attempted rape.https://t.co/8ToHPOqgET

— REDUXX (@reduxx) September 16, 2026

“I had always walked freely without fear or intimidation, and this experience fundamentally changed my sense of safety. I had become more prepared, but also more vigilant, knowing that one’s life can be suddenly disrupted by extreme violence, even when simply trying to get home.”

Judge Troy Anderson described the crime as “intentional and, frankly, very frightening”. However, during a sentencing hearing in September, he took into consideration Jones’ diagnoses of schizophrenia, gender dysphoria, historic substance abuse and depression and anxiety. In Sydney, the maximum penalty for rape, or an attempt to commit it, falls under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), and carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years; whereas Jones, a repeat criminal on the sex offender registry, was handed a three-year sentence. With time already spent in custody, Jones will be eligible for parole on November 21.

The serial sex offender had committed similar crimes previously. Jones has a prior record for sexually abusing a 6-year-old girl in Germany, for which he served six years in a male prison there prior to being deported to Australia in 2018.

In 2021, Jones was again arrested after attempting to rape a woman as she was walking home on Lennox Street in Richmond. While pinning her down, Jones repeated: “Why won’t you lay down and have sex with me?”

The woman had been in the middle of a phone call with her mother at the time of the attack. She began screaming her location into the receiver before Jones was able to disconnect the call.

He then put his hands down the woman’s underwear and tried to pull down the victim’s jeans, but she was able to successfully fight him off as bystanders came rushing to her aid. Jones was ultimately detained after some bystanders chased him down as he tried to flee the scene.

“I didn’t do anything, it was her fault,” Jones told the court.

Incarcerated women in Australia are protesting the transfer of a trans-identified male inmate previously convicted of multiple sex crimes.

Reduxx believes the transfer to be Lisa Jones, who was convicted of an assault on a woman in Melbourne last year.https://t.co/Cl11GMBjpN

— REDUXX (@reduxx) August 11, 2022

While Jones denied accountability for the attack, he was sentenced to three years and three months. In July of 2022, shortly after sentencing, he was placed in a women’s prison to serve his sentence. Within weeks, female inmates at the Dame Phyllis Frost Correctional Centre launched a petition to have him removed out of fears for their own safety.

The petitioners addressed the Minister for Corrections, the Department of Justice and Community Safety, Corrections Victoria and the Ombudsman when asking for the matter to be handled swiftly.

“We feel threatened, unsafe, distressed and traumatised with this current situation. Accordingly, we demand that (the inmate) be immediately removed from the Murray unit,” the petition read. “We consider this petition a matter of urgency and would therefore appreciate your prompt response.”

According to the petition, many women prisoners have been victims of sexual assault and as a result, many “carry significant trauma associated with this experience.”

In addition to the petition from female inmates, women’s rights advocates contacted several politicians about the issue. However, “not a single one has done a single thing about it,” noted campaigner Sall Grover.

Meet Benjamin Jones aka “Lisa Jones” or “Willow”.

Benjamin, an Australian man, was convinced in Germany of sexually abusing a 6 year old girl and imprisoned there for 6 years. He was then deported to Australia. He was placed on the AU child sex offender registry.

When he… pic.twitter.com/HIE97nkX6r

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) November 1, 2026

Grover is an entrepreneur who found herself at the center of Australia’s gender identity debate after she was forced to defend herself in court over a period of years. Jason “Roxanne” Tickle filed a discrimination complaint through the Australian Human Rights Commission over being denied access to women-only application Giggle for Girls, which was founded by Grover. Tickle had been barred from using the female-only platform, intended as an “online refuge” for women, after Grover identified him as male based on a photo he submitted during the membership application process.

In September, The High Court of Australia denied an appeal lodged by Grover in the landmark case which ruled that “sex is changeable.” To date, Grover has had to raise over $1.5 million to cover legal costs, and confirmed to Reduxx that she has been ordered to pay a sum that will ultimately amount to around $500,000 in fees to compensate the legal team of the man who sued her.

Despite this, Grover has continued to raise awareness of the conflict between gender identity policies and women’s rights, and has now written to the Attorney General regarding Jones’ case. Grover is requesting a revision of the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA), which was altered in 2013 under the government of prime minister Julia Gillard. The revisions to the SDA made it unlawful under federal law to discriminate against a person on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

“Will the Government introduce amendments restoring clear, biological definitions of ‘man’ and ‘woman’ in the Sex Discrimination Act, so that the legal category of woman is reserved for adult human females and does not extend to men who claim a female identity?” Grover wrote. “Given more than a decade of practical consequences, does the Attorney-General accept that the time for SDA reform has long passed?”

I have written to Australia’s Attorney-General regarding the predatory man who claims/has claimed to be a woman, asking how the sex discrimination act will be applied to him & what legal rights the rest of us without a special “gender identity” even have.

“Will the Government… pic.twitter.com/dZGbNfGX1d

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) November 2, 2026

While it is unclear how many trans-identified male transfers are currently housed at Dame Phyllis Frost, Reduxx has reported on another sex offender who is serving a shockingly lenient 4-year sentence there for creating horrific child sexual abuse material of his own child and distributing it to a pedophile lover.

“Autumn Tulip” Harper was in a BDSM relationship with an American sex offender, who he referred to as his “Master”. The offender encouraged Harper to sexually abuse his daughter for his own gratification, and praised him for doing so, calling him a “good girl,” and saying how “impressed” with him he was. Through Discord, Harper sent media of himself abusing the child, which he was said to have done on at least 19 different occasions.

Yet disturbingly, the acts of child sexual abuse committed by Harper were reframed during court proceedings as a form of validation of his “gender identity”. The judge in the case, Nola Karapanagiotidis, allowed Harper’s supposed experience with “gender dysphoria” and “transphobia” to serve as mitigating factors, and accepted the argument from the defense that he had abused his own daughter solely to be “validated… as a woman and a sexual person.”

reduxx

After Labour’s U-turn on migrant settlement, Nigel Farage pledges to review every grant of British citizenship made possible by the change.

The debate over indefinite leave to remain is happening because of an absolutely dreadful betrayal of the will not just of Brexit voters but of those who voted for Boris Johnson’s government in 2019.

In 2010, 2015 and 2017, the Conservatives promised to reduce net migration to the tens of thousands a year. The implication in 2019, with Brexit, was exactly the same.

Yet in 2023, net migration was nearly one million.

Our big fear about the Boriswave was what the enormous cost for this country would be. The cost in terms of numbers, the cost in terms of pressure on the NHS, the cost in terms of housing, of rental prices and everything else.

That’s why last September, Zia Yusuf and I gave a press conference in which we said indefinite leave to remain after five years in the country is not a right. Actually, it’s being abused by too many people who use it as a means not only to live on benefits for the rest of their lives, but also to bring family members in from across the rest of the world.

Controversial? Yes. Everything we do is controversial. That is, until everybody else copies it.

A few weeks later, the relatively new Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood said pretty much what we were saying. She was worried about the Boriswave, worried about the huge damage the Tory government had done to the country. She wouldn’t remove indefinite leave to remain, but she’d kick the can down the road for at least another five years.

The tough new Home Secretary has found that her own left-wing backbenchers simply won’t tolerate it. Even the Prime Minister, at the time of the Makerfield by-election, said he was very much minded to support the reforms.

But Labour has now backed down. Health and care visa holders covered by the exemption will still be able to apply for indefinite leave to remain after five years. Now, of course, comes the capitulation – or should I say the beginning of the capitulation.

How many people will go directly on to indefinite leave to remain and then citizenship one year later? It’s difficult to tell. Is it a quarter of a million? Is it the first quarter of a million? Does it open the door to legal challenges and many, many others? We will see.

Normal countries don’t give out work visas, allow you to bring dependants, automatically give you indefinite leave to remain and then, one year later, citizenship.

Our position is very clear. For anybody who goes through to indefinite leave to remain and citizenship under the scheme that’s been opened today, we will review each and every one of those grants of citizenship.

Our approach today is not one I would have wished to take. I always thought that the granting of British citizenship was a very special thing. But it has now been so devalued that we will need to review each and every case. 

This is an edited extract of a speech delivered by Nigel Farage on 2nd November. Watch the full press conference here.

reformparty

Two teenage males of non-Danish ethnic origin face multiple charges including gang rape of a 14-year-old girl over more than seven hours, rape of a 13-year-old under threat of a knife, and related offenses involving other underage girls, according to an indictment obtained by the Danish newspaper B.T.

The first alleged incident occurred April 28, 2026, at an address in Kalundborg, west of Copenhagen. The two friends, ages 17 and 18, are accused of gang-raping the 14-year-old twice during a span of more than seven hours despite her protests and attempts to leave, according to the indictment.

On May 21, 2026, both are charged with raping a 13-year-old girl in a car in a Kalundborg parking lot while threatening her with a knife so she would not resist. The 17-year-old is also accused of having sex with that girl in the days before the incident, when she was below Denmark’s age of consent.

Both suspects are charged with holding her down and forcing her to take a morning-after pill. In addition, the 17-year-old is accused of punching her in the stomach twice.

Additional charges involve sexual touching of a third 13-year-old girl, forcing the girls to hand over phones and passcodes, and threats such as “If this gets out, it’s going to go really bad.”

The case is scheduled for a jury trial at Holbæk District Court in the coming weeks. Two 17-year-olds had earlier been remanded in custody in connection with the May incident involving the 13-year-old.

Danish data analyst Jonatan Pallesen, who holds a PhD in statistical genetics and frequently posts on immigration and crime statistics, shared a post from B.T. journalist Niels Philip Kjeldsen detailing the charges. Pallesen wrote: “Another day, another 7-hour long rape of a 14-year-old native girl by Muslim immigrants. It’s hard to understand how the pro-immigration voters keep accepting this terrible cost of the policies they support. They don’t think about it, I guess. We must make them think about it.”

Another day, another 7-hour long rape of a 14-year-old native girl by Muslim immigrants.

It's hard to understand how the pro-immigration voters keep accepting this terrible cost of the policies they support. They don't think about it, I guess. We must make them think about it. https://t.co/dp2YGDu7WQ

— Jonatan Pallesen (@jonatanpallesen) November 3, 2026

The news follows a number of similar cases in Denmark as of late, a country known for its low immigration numbers.

In September, Remix News reported on a 14-year-old girl who was violently anally raped on a park bench in Copenhagen by a suspect with an Arabic name.

In another case, a Palestinian migrant who raped five different women in Denmark had his ‘life’ sentence reduced dramatically to just 2.5 years on appeal.

In another case, a man with an “Arabic-sounding name” raped a mother while she was sleeping next to her 4-year-old child.

rmx

A 14-year-old boy was found at a secret detention facility linked to Ukraine’s notorious Azov Corps near Kyiv on Monday, 2 November, amid disturbing reports of torture and the unlawful imprisonment of dozens of people. Shocking footage circulating on social media shows the teenager being escorted from the property, while Azov has confirmed that one of its military units operated at the location, where several injured servicemen were also discovered.

The scandal erupted in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka, a suburb west of Kyiv, after reports emerged that armed personnel were holding dozens of people inside a private house. Videos rapidly spreading across Ukrainian social media showed angry residents attempting to break through the property’s gates, confronting masked personnel and demanding the release of those reportedly being held in its basement.

Some of the most disturbing footage shows visibly injured men inside the building, while another recording captures a man with an apparently bloodied head climbing over a fence. Witnesses accused those operating the facility of beating and torturing detainees, claiming that several were in critical condition and had been denied medical assistance.

The discovery of the 14-year-old further intensified the scandal. Eyewitnesses said the teenager had been beaten with a shovel, leaving him in a severely distressed condition. Kyrylo Budanov, head of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, visited the scene and spoke to the boy, describing the situation as ‘something that should not happen’ and promising to investigate the bizarre case.

However, Budanov made an even more alarming revelation when questioned about the existence of the facility. ‘Many similar buildings exist,’ he acknowledged, according to Ukraine’s Channel 24, adding that authorities would investigate why such facilities operated and what happened inside them. He also revealed that 14 people were being held at the property.

According to the Azov Corps, the property had been used by Military Unit 3121 as a ‘temporary deployment facility’, meaning that mobilized servicemen and soldiers apprehended after going absent without leave were ‘accommodated’ there before being transferred to their respective units.

However, that explanation has done little to settle questions about the visible injuries and mental distress of those found inside the facility. National Guard commander Oleksandr Pivnenko confirmed that four servicemen had been taken to hospital, while promising an investigation into the case.

Notably, Ukrainian police had earlier dismissed reports of unlawful detention and a death inside the building. Ambulance personnel also complained that they had been prevented from reaching a patient inside.

Azov traces its origins to a formation established in 2014, following Russia’s annexation of Crimea, by far-right militants with neo-Nazi connections. Incorporated into the Ukrainian National Guard later that year, it gained notoriety during the battles of Mariupol, Ilovaisk and Shyrokyne before becoming internationally renowned for its resistance during the 2022 siege of Mariupol, where its fighters defended the Azovstal steelworks for nearly three months before surrendering to Russian forces.

‘The formation also faced allegations of unlawful detention and mistreatment during the Donbas conflict’

Despite its battlefield reputation, Azov has remained controversial over its neo-Nazi origins, extremist symbolism and alleged human rights abuses. Its founder, Andriy Biletsky, previously led the far-right Patriot of Ukraine organization, while the broader Azov movement established the ultranationalist National Corps political party and the National Militia, a paramilitary organization linked to intimidation and violence against minorities. The formation also faced allegations of unlawful detention and mistreatment during the Donbas conflict, while Washington restricted military assistance to Azov for years before lifting the ban in 2024.

The formation has since expanded into the 1st National Guard Corps ‘Azov’, established in March 2025 and incorporating several brigades and regiments under a unified command structure. Although its present leadership rejects neo-Nazi associations, the disturbing images of injured men emerging from an Azov-linked detention facility have renewed scrutiny of the formation’s roots and raised serious concerns about the brutal treatment of those in its custody. Budanov’s acknowledgement that similar facilities exist elsewhere now raises questions extending far beyond one suburban house.

hungarianconservative

Supermarkets in Belgium, Sweden, Luxembourg, Ireland, the Netherlands, Finland and Estonia reported overnight refrigeration failures on 1–2 November 2026, with freezers and fridges remotely forced into defrost mode or set to extreme heat. Retailers discarded large quantities of chilled and frozen food after units reached 50°C (122°F) or higher in some locations.

Belgium was among the hardest hit. Ahold Delhaize reported an IT incident affecting refrigeration at roughly 40 Delhaize stores across Belgium and Luxembourg. Carrefour counted about 15 affected locations, with additional reports involving Intermarché, Spar franchises and other outlets. Belgian refrigeration firm Sabcobel stated that evaporators were switched to defrost mode.

In Sweden, ICA and Coop stores were affected. One ICA store in Sjöbo posted that its freezers had been “hacked” and set to 50°C; staff described the contents as destroyed and hot air blowing into the units. Coop confirmed issues at a limited number of its stores. Similar temperature spikes hit 13 SuperValu stores in Ireland, with further reports in Estonia, Finland and the Netherlands.

This follows a larger wave in France overnight on 11–12 October. Hackers raised temperatures in refrigeration systems at hundreds of stores—reports cited figures up to around 700—across chains including Intermarché, Carrefour, Coopérative U and Monoprix. Units were pushed from sub-zero temperatures to 50°C or more for hours, spoiling food, triggering some fires and causing losses estimated in the tens of millions of euros. France’s national cybersecurity agency and prosecutors investigated the “large-scale” attack.

Investigators have not publicly identified the perpetrators or confirmed a single actor behind both waves. The method involves internet-exposed refrigeration controllers, often older or unpatched systems (including certain Danfoss models and others), that can be accessed remotely to override setpoints or force defrost cycles. Cybersecurity firms noted many such devices remain exposed online.

Pentagon Also Examining European Incidents

Separately, the Pentagon is treating freezer malfunctions that spoiled food at commissaries on at least six U.S. military bases in late August 2026 as a suspected cyberattack. At Fort Huachuca in Arizona, a freezer entered defrost mode and heated its contents. U.S. Cyber Command and the Army Criminal Investigation Division are involved and have coordinated with French authorities examining the European incidents, but no conclusive public link has been established between the U.S. and European cases.

EU officials described the European incidents as a deliberate attempt to disrupt food supply chains. The attacks underscore long-standing risks in operational technology (OT) systems used for refrigeration, which are increasingly internet-connected for monitoring and management but often lack modern security controls. Retailers and authorities have urged patching of exposed controllers and better network segmentation.

No group has claimed responsibility. Investigations remain ongoing across multiple countries.

freewestmedia

A war memorial has been targeted in what Police are investigating as a hate crime, just days ahead of Remembrance Sunday.

The head of a statue depicting Jesus Christ was smashed from the crucifix, and anti-Catholic graffiti was spray-painted across the monument at St Alban’s Catholic Church in Warrington.

The offensive words scrawled on the memorial’s plaque read “no cross s**t y”.

In a video posted to the church’s Facebook page, parish priest Canon Christopher Cunningham described the attack as an act of “true persecution” and said “offensive language against the Catholic Church” had been daubed on the statue.

The memorial bears the names of local parishioners who gave their lives during both World Wars.

Cheshire Police believe the damage was inflicted between 6pm and 10pm on Friday, October 30, with a congregant discovering the vandalism at 9.23am on Sunday morning.

Officers noted several other incidents in the surrounding area during the same period.

The force has since released CCTV footage of an individual they wish to speak to in connection with the attack.

Detectives are also conducting forensic analysis at the scene as part of their enquiries.

Residents and motorists in the Bewsey Street area are being urged to check any doorbell cameras, dashcam recordings or mobile phone footage that might help identify those involved.

A church volunteer has since cleaned the offensive language from the memorial’s plaque.

Chief Inspector Joseph McNally of Warrington’s local policing unit said: “The vandalism of a war memorial is particularly upsetting as these sites exist to honour those who made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our country.”

He added that such behaviour was “completely unacceptable” and had a profound effect on both churchgoers and the broader community.

He said: “Places of worship should be safe and welcoming environments, and we are committed to identifying those responsible for this incident.”

Speaking at Sunday morning Mass, Canon Cunningham urged his congregation to “stick together” and draw strength from their faith.

Parishioner Alice Hughes Froggatt wrote on Facebook: “I am beyond saddened to hear of this awful desecration of the holy crucifix.”

Another parishioner, Tricia Reilly, expressed hope that the memorial could be restored, adding it was “hard to pray for cruel, nasty people but we must”.

St Alban’s holds a distinguished place in Warrington’s religious history as the town’s oldest surviving Catholic parish, established in 1772.

The church carries Grade II listed status and boasts architectural features of national significance, including a sanctuary designed in 1893 by Peter Paul Pugin, whose father Augustus Pugin famously contributed to the Palace of Westminster.

The investigation comes days before Remembrance Sunday services are due to take place across Warrington in the coming days.

Anyone who recognises the individual in the CCTV image or who witnessed suspicious activity near the church on Bewsey Street is asked to contact Cheshire Police on 101, quoting incident reference IML 2449856. Reports can also be made via the force’s website or anonymously through Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

gbnews

by J.B. Shurk

It seems morbidly appropriate that America’s midterm elections come right after Halloween.  What the Democrat Party offers voters this year is the culmination of many decades of cultural rot, psychopathy, and anti-Americanism.  

It feels as if we’re in the middle of a scary movie, doesn’t it?  Are we hanging from the edge of a cliff?  Yes.  Are there evil monsters chasing us down?  Yes.  Does it seem as if every choice we make could be our last?  Yes.

What the Democrat Party has become is truly horrific.  Like Frankenstein’s monster, its political body is comprised of dead parts: Islamic supremacy, racial grievance, class warfare, cultural Marxism, cultish communism, child sacrifice, child mutilation, sexual deviance, and pagan gods.  Everything the Democrats celebrate today is disgusting, gruesome, and deserving of an R-rating.

A lot of Americans have drifted from the Democrat to the Republican Party over the last few decades.  

It is apt that the two Republican presidents of the last century that Republican voters rate most highly — President Reagan and President Trump — both spent parts of their lives as members of the Democrat Party.  

There was a time when Republicans and Democrats were not so different.  President Kennedy’s low-tax, pro-manufacturing policies were very similar to Trump’s economic growth agenda today.  Kennedy Democrats included anti-communist military veterans who would feel right at home in this century’s Republican Party.  

Blue-collar workers who once identified as Democrats have realized that President Trump’s MAGA-fied Republican Party is the only party interested in supercharging the number of industrial and manufacturing jobs in the United States.  

Democrats (including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and communist darling Bernie Sanders) once campaigned for secure national borders and against illegal immigration — the very things that they demonize today.  

What does it say about the Democrat Party that it has abandoned almost every salient belief that it once held dear?  

Democrats used to defend free speech, no matter how offensive the language.  Now they censor dissenting points of view and justify the use of violence to stop “hate speech.”

Democrats used to believe that a person’s character is more important than the color of that person’s skin.  Now they obsess over skin color and treat white people as second-class citizens.  

Democrats used to champion equality of opportunity for women.  Now they punish high school girls who object to being forced to change in the same locker rooms as confused boys and ridicule girls who refuse to compete against boys in girls’ sports.  

The Democrat Party used to include a huge number of hunters, military veterans, and other Americans who accepted the responsibility of self-defense.  Now Democrats vilify gun owners as if they were domestic terrorists while protecting violent criminals who use weapons against innocent Americans.  

The Democrat Party used to include a huge number of practicing Catholics, devout Protestants, and observant Jews.  It included thoughtful scholars such as Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, whose report on black poverty recognized marriage as the lynchpin to social mobility.  It included cultural groups, civic organizations, and clubs that promoted strong, healthy families.  

Now Democrats dismiss marriage and the nuclear family as vestiges of “patriarchy” and “white supremacy.”  They use their power over legal associations and medical boards to promote the castration and mutilation of children.  Many Democrats promote promiscuity and sexual fetishization as “healthy” lifestyles and not-so-subtly endorse incest, bestiality, and pedophilia.  

At what point does it not become obvious that the Democrat Party has become the “safe space” for grotesque evils?

When an illegal alien rapes and/or murders an American girl, Democrats in public office and Democrats working as “journalists” show more compassion for the rapist/murderer than they do for the broken victim.  

This is monstrous, abhorrent, anti-American behavior that I would not have thought possible thirty years ago.  Most of us remember a time when Americans took care of and protected other Americans.  We beat back those who threatened our peace, and we hunted monsters that hurt American children.  Now Democrats describe the monsters among us as victims and ignore the dead American girls and their suffering American families altogether.  What a ghoulish, soulless party the Democrats have become.

Last week, an illegal alien from Mexico used a sledgehammer to damage an Iwo Jima monument in Quantico, Virginia, and during his act of desecration, the foreigner beheaded one of the statues depicting American marines’ utmost sacrifice in the Pacific Theater during the Second World War.  

The Battle of Iwo Jima was one of the bloodiest conflicts in American history, and three of the men depicted in that monument never came home.  Decapitating a hero’s likeness is an act of hatred against America and disrespect for all American veterans.  

Nevertheless, Democrat politicians and Democrat “journalists” ignored the story as much as possible, and when forced to acknowledge it, Democrats blamed the incident on a generic “Virginia man,” as if the crime were a minor act of vandalism of no significance.  

This is how little respect Democrats have for American heroes, American history, and American sacrifice.  Democrats in office and Democrats in newsrooms write glowing propaganda in defense of foreign nationals who have no business being in the United States, but they completely disregard the vile acts of destruction that monsters perpetrate against American citizens and their cherished symbols.  

We also know that if Democrats regain Congress and the presidency, the worst is yet to come.  

President Obama and President Biden are responsible for over two-thirds of the district court judges currently on the bench.  This is why some federal judge is always inventing laws or parts of the Constitution that do not exist or usurping Article II powers that belong to President Trump.  The only impediment to the Democrats’ complete takeover of the Judiciary is the Supreme Court — or, more accurately, the stalwart defense of the Constitution coming from the jurisprudence of Justice Thomas and Justice Alito.

Democrats have made no secret of their plans to get rid of the Senate filibuster should they achieve a simple governing majority.  With fifty Democrat senators and a Democrat in the White House in January 2029, they will unleash a barrage of legislation and finish the “fundamental transformation” of the United States government that began in earnest during Obama’s presidency.  

Democrats will recognize the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico as new states, adding four more Democrat senators to the upper chamber.  

Democrats will once again open America’s borders to foreign invasion and grant mass amnesty and citizenship to any foreigner in the world.  By doing so, Democrats will greatly expand the number of Democrat voters and obtain an insurmountable supermajority in the House of Representatives.  

As they have repeatedly promised, Democrats will add at least six new justices to the Supreme Court, ensuring complete ideological control over the federal judiciary.  

In three quick moves, the Democrat Party will successfully erect a one-party political system with permanent power over the federal government — indistinguishable from the monopoly power that the Chinese Communist Party has enjoyed since 1949.

That’s how fast Islamo-communism and the European Union’s brand of totalitarian globalism will take over the United States if Americans don’t fight back.  

We know what happens then.  Democrat Senator Elissa Slotkin and her collaborators have promised to lock up Trump supporters.  Democrat Senator Adam Schiff and Democrat Senator Chris Murphy promise to censor political dissent on social media — effectively killing the First Amendment.  The Democrat-controlled IRS, FBI, and DOJ will once again persecute us as “potential domestic terrorists.”  Democrats will kill the Second Amendment and come for our firearms.  Democrats will use taxpayer dollars to fund their Antifa paramilitary and NGO armies and direct them to burn down cities and attack Americans.  Democrats will celebrate the assassination of Charlie Kirk and incite their followers to murder more of us.

Avoid this horror movie.  Vote Republican on Tuesday.

americanthinker