Flavio Bolsonaro Wins First Round of Brazilian Elections, Leading 47.3% to 44.9% over Dirty CCP-Puppet Lula – Conservatives Win Record Number in Senate – Runoff Oct. 25

Flavio Bolsonaro wins first round in presidential election in Brazil.

Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of political prisoner and former president Jair Bolsonaro, won the first round of voting in the Brazilian elections on Sunday over CCP-puppet Luiz Inacio Lula de Silva.

Flavio Bolsonaro spent the entire night flirting with 50%, but he was not able to hit the magic number of 50% plus one.

Because Bolsonaro did not gain a majority of the vote, there will be a runoff election on October 25.

Brazil conducts essentially all of its elections through electronic voting machines (urnas eletrônicas), and has done so nationwide since 2000. There are no paper ballots. The system helped commie Lula defeat wildly popular Jair Bolsonaro in 2022. Then, Lula had his rival arrested and imprisoned. Just like the Democrats like to do in America!

Flavio was not able to hit the 50% mark all night for some reason.

However, Bolsonaro’s Progressive (conservative) party emerged as the largest force in the Senate.

The conservatives had a record night in the Senate.

Lula’s Federal Police placed the US under investigation during the election on Sunday.

This sets the stage for the socialists to annul the likely election loss they will suffer later this month.

The communists were hurting after their USAID money was nixed.

USAID donations to Brazil doubled in Brazil after Bolsonaro won in 2018. That was taxpayer dollars going to commies to take down the conservative! Trump ended that.

Argentina’s President Javier Milei posted a congratulations to Flavio and Brazil.

thegatewaypundit

The Viennese left-wing party LINKS used the slogan “Allahu Akbar” to illustrate a social media post

Vienna’s Left Party uses ‘Allahu Akbar’ as slogan. Screenshot LINKS / Facebook

A dangerous alliance between the far left and radical Islam: the Viennese party LINKS is calling for an attack on the headscarf ban and blaming the state and the media for alleged racism. This deliberate blurring of boundaries threatens social harmony in the capital.
The radical Viennese group LINKS is causing outrage with a scandalous campaign. The slogan ‘Allahu Akbar’ is emblazoned in huge letters on its official platforms – a phrase that has evoked deeply negative associations long before the recent Islamist terrorist attacks in Europe. Instead of clearly distancing itself from Islamist ideology, the far-left party is deliberately using the slogan as a hook to mobilise opposition to the planned headscarf ban in schools and to reinterpret this misogynistic symbol as a matter of so-called religious freedom.

In an unprecedented reversal of the perpetrator-victim narrative, the far-left accuses the Austrian political establishment and the media landscape across the board of ‘anti-Muslim racism’. The headscarf ban, which is primarily intended to protect underage girls from religious and family coercion, is branded a ‘racist law’ by the far left. By escalating the issue in this way, the party is defaming any attempt to uphold values such as equality and secular education in the face of religious fundamentalism.

The online campaign marks the start of further mobilisations within left-wing circles. On October 8, the group is inviting people to its club premises on the Rechten Wienzeile to rant about racism, which they claim is deeply entrenched in the state. This campaign highlights once again the creeping erosion of boundaries amongst sections of the Viennese left, who, out of sheer hatred for the bourgeois order, no longer even shy away from aligning themselves with the most reactionary forces of political Islam.

Unzensuriert

France Youth Riots Manipulated by Far-Left Mélenchon Party, Paris Police Report Finds

A report from the Paris Police’s intelligence branch has reportedly found that radical presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s far-left La France Insoumise party instigated the youth riots which plunged much of the country into chaos this week.

Over 5,000 people were arrested this week as mayhem broke out around the so-called student actions at over a thousand high schools across France, in which multicultural youths ran roughshod, engaging in mindless destruction and wanton violence, including attacks on police and innocent bystanders, arson, and vandalism

According to Interior Minister Laurent Nunez, some 85 per cent of the arrests made during the riots were under the age of 18.

However, a report from the Paris Police Prefect claimed that other forces were likely pulling the strings behind the scenes, finding that “the origins of the movement clearly lie in the manipulation of student union structures and political movements close to the far left.”

The report, obtained by Le Figaro, claimed that members of political organisations such as the Young Revolutionary Communists and the La France Insoumise (LFI/France in Rebellion) party of Jean-Luc Mélenchon may have a “strategy of igniting unrest on the part of the most radical union and political structures to impose their ideas as national elections approach.”

While the students largely displayed “a clear desire for disorder, notably through the commission of urban violence, without any specific social demands,” the police report said that “clearly, high school students are being pushed into these actions by far-left elements identified both within student union structures at Paris 8 University (Le Poing levé, FSE), or Paris Nanterre (FSE).”

The police report noted that some of the actions taken by youth rioters pointed to “remote control” from left-wing unions, including prompt mobilisation outside of police stations following arrests of rioters for mortar attacks, protests which they said were “common for these organisations but quite rare among young people.”

Meanwhile, of the forty arrests detailed in the report, around a quarter were identified as far-left activists who had left high school long ago, having been born between 1999 and 2005.

The sentiment that the far-left was manipulating the street violence was also shared by Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu, whose office said this week that the intelligence service believed that the riots were a “manoeuvre organised by LFI and its far-left proxies.”

Rather than backing down, LFI leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon appears intent on doubling down. In a blog post on Saturday, Mélenchon, who participated in the 1968 student riots in France, called on his supporters to join the planned “Act III” student protests this week.

The 75-year-old presidential candidate claimed that the involvement of his party over the past week on the ground at protests was necessary to protect the students from police violence.

“Our duty is to help and protect our young people. That’s why I proposed, like others, deploying “white helmets” or white armbands around and within the demonstrations on October 6th, as was done in the past after the death of Malik Oussekine or to protect the high school student demonstrations of the 1990s,” he wrote.

The youth riots have already proved costly, with initial estimates of damages ranging into the tens of millions. According to the leader of the Île-de-France regional council, Valérie Pécresse, some “seven million euros already gone up in smoke”.  The president of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, Fabrice Pannekoucke, said that his area likely saw between 25 and 30 million euros in damages.

However, this may be outweighed by the human toll, with some victims suffering life-altering injuries, including a woman who had her face burned with a homemade flamethrower while she was waiting for a bus in Marseille. On Sunday, local prosecutors announced that a 15-year-old had been arrested over the incident and “was brought before an investigating judge for formal charges of acts of barbarity”.

Speaking to BFMTV, the victim said: “I didn’t expect such violence… To see a kid you don’t know, someone you were talking to normally, deliberately aiming at your face… He didn’t aim for your clothes, he didn’t aim for your legs. He aimed for my face. Why?”

breitbart

UK Gifts 1,000+ Free Hijabs to Illegal Migrants via Taxpayer’s Purse

The British government has handed out more than 1,000 taxpayer-funded hijabs to migrants arriving illegally across the English Channel.

According to internal Home Office figures reported by The Daily Mail, officials distributed 974 of the Islamic head coverings to small-boat migrants, an average of 162 every month between January and June.

At that rate, the total handed out at taxpayer expense is likely in the thousands

“The Government must stop handing out hijabs to illegal immigrants immediately,” Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said.

“It’s an insult to hard-working British taxpayers that they’re funding religious items for people who have broken into our country. It should not be for us to fund someone else’s religious practices.”

Many are also wondering why British taxpayers are paying to promote a symbol of female subservience.

Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott recently came out against hijabs forming part of school uniforms.

“I do not believe the state should be party to an instrument of female suppression,” she said.

The taxpayer-funded clothing is being distributed as Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s government refuses to stop the boats despite promises to do so.

More than 19,000 migrants have made the journey so far this year, with hundreds, if not thousands, more arriving every week.

Although overall crossings are down from 2025, boats have become increasingly crowded, carrying an average of 67 people per vessel.

The Home Office defended the practice by claiming it has obligations to provide appropriate basic clothing to migrants in short-term holding facilities.

“All arrivals receive a basic dry clothing pack where required,” a spokesman said. “The items available form part of standard welfare arrangements.”

Government figures also reveal the enormous quantity of other types of clothing being provided to illegal migrants.

Officials handed out 10,694 male clothing packs, alongside 2,670 female packs, 773 for boys, and 829 for girls.

The taxpayer-funded supplies also included hundreds of beanie hats and babygrows.

“Illegal immigrants crossing the Channel are breaking into our country,” Philp added. “They have no legitimate reason to flee France, which is clearly safe.”

breitbart

Feminism is a Dangerous Ideology that Destroys Families, Society & Institutions

{YouTube CC-BY 4.0}

Feminism is in an unending war against men, families and civilisation. It is undermining our society, destroying relationships between men and women, making both males and females unhappy – and it is destroying our institutions.

So says Prof. Janice Fiamengo, a retired professor from the University of Ottawa, a former feminist and the author of the new book “The Goddess That Failed: Feminism’s Unending War Against Men, Families and Civilization Itself”

Is Paris always burning?

Riposte Laique

by Silvio Canto, Jr. 

It must be Paris burning again. So, what’s new? What are they burning the city over this time? Who is angry at whom?

Two things happen every year in France. First, everybody is on vacation in August. And second, there is some angry guy burning something over this or that.

The latest is that students started the fires this time. This is from Jeffrey Blehar:

The schools of France are currently in flames, with the nation several days into a national bout of student rioting: From the quasi-Belgian northern hub of Lille to the banlieus of Paris to the streets of Marseille, schools are burning, as high school students across the nation have blockaded and rampaged against their schools and anyone unlucky enough to be caught in the crossfire. I know what you’re thinking: Student rioting? In France of all places? The deuce you say!

But there are significantly darker undertones this time. The rioting has only escalated in the last two days. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has called an emergency meeting of the French cabinet and declared a national crisis — far too late, in the opinion of many. The immediate flashpoint for the rioting is still hazy — it seems to have spread via social media, quelle surprise — but the media is universally reporting it as an oh-so-French rebellion by “the kids” against having to work too hard at school.

Having to work too hard in school? Like having to do homework? I thought that working hard in school is how you trained the next generation to be successful and positive adults. I guess I must be old-fashioned to think like that.

This is from Blehar again:

There were also confrontations between children and police in Bordeaux, Rennes and Nantes in western France, and Marseille in the south. At the Lamartine lycée, in the north of Paris, students waved placards complaining they had exhausting timetables. One read: “8am-6pm. More hours of lessons than sleep.”

More hours of sleep than lessons? That’s weird. Don’t they sleep at home? How many hours of sleep does a student need?

Still confused. The best explanation is from Daniel Foubert:

It’s a long post (too long to reproduce here), but this part explains so much:

Authority becomes embarrassed to exercise authority. Rules exist, but nobody wants to enforce them. The majority understands that the situation is absurd, yet waits for somebody else to restore normality. A determined minority quickly learns that if it creates enough disruption, institutions will adapt themselves to the disruption rather than stop it.

And once that reflex becomes normal, it spreads far beyond schools.

You begin to get a society in which blocking roads, occupying universities, shutting down public buildings, preventing people from working or studying, and paralysing transport are treated not as exceptional breakdowns of normal life, but almost as recognised forms of political expression.

It is COWARDICE elevated into a social norm: the refusal to confront, to sanction, to impose limits, to say no. A whole culture of retreat in which passivity is mistaken for tolerance and fear of conflict for moral superiority.

France has become spineless, gregarious, barbarian.

Yes, we’ve seen this movie before. The insane are running the asylum. The criminals are running the streets. The teachers are scared of students. And so everything goes to heck. And what do the country’s leaders do? Nothing, because they’re scared of the mob too.

americanthinker

France: A Sick Country on a Sick Continent

“Who didn’t see that coming? Oh yeah ….the politicians,” noted “The Great Gats” on X.

The French government was reportedly “taken by surprise” when students began rioting roughly two weeks ago to protest conditions — overcrowded classes, dilapidated buildings, vermin and rats, lack of heating and air-conditioning, shortage of teachers — in their schools.

“But,” American journalist Michael Shellenberger writes, ” French schools have more money per pupil today than at any earlier time…. The French government spends 4.5% of gross domestic product on educational institutions, and Germany spends 3.7%.

The violent riots, which started on Paris’s Ile de France and spread throughout the country, appear, according to investigations, to have been instigated by the French political party La France Insoumise (France Unbowed) headed by Jean Luc Melenchon, a far-left candidate in the French presidential elections scheduled for the spring of 2027. La France Insoumise denies the charges; however, according to Shellenberger, “the evidence clearly shows that La France insoumise (LFI)… instigated and led the protests.”

“The protest had ‘the involvement from the start of elected officials of La France insoumise and ultra-left collectives,’ an anonymous security official told Le Point. A readout of the prime minister’s October 1 crisis meeting, given to Reuters by a person close to him, described the movement as ‘an operation organised by LFI (France Unbowed) and its proxies on the far left’ in the ‘shared assessment’ of the intelligence services….

“‘Parents, Insoumis [party] activists, mobilize to interpose yourselves against police savagery,’ said Mélenchon, blaming the police, not the students, for the violence….

“In Marseille, hundreds of young people forced firefighters to flee their truck outside a lycée and then set it alight. In Paris, about ten protesters chased a trainee police lieutenant, threw her to the ground and kicked her amid cries of ‘Kill her!….’

“‘We’re not entirely sure that they are even high-school students themselves,’ said the French Justice Minister of the people arrested….”

“The French Left has waged war on schools while building an alliance with Islamist leaders who hope to radically transform them. For both, the fight starts with the schools. ‘Clearly, religious and politico-religious organizations “work on” these pupils, sometimes from primary school, as well as their family, their social milieu and their neighborhood, and some try to set them against the school,’ the Education Ministry inspectorate’s June 2004 report on religion in schools said.

“What brings Islamists and the revolutionary left together is their intention to tear down Western civilization. The French Interior Ministry’s May 2025 report on the Muslim Brotherhood described the movement’s project in France as ‘a long process of political conquest’ with ‘systematically priority investment at the local level.’

“The children of Muslim immigrants are often more radical than their parents. ‘There is first of all a generational revolt,’ wrote Olivier Roy, a French scholar of Islam, in 2015 of French jihadists….”

“LFI openly courts Muslim voters, and a parliamentary inquiry said that made it a target for Islamist networks….

“‘LFI’s commitment to a clientelist strategy toward the Muslim electorate may have made this movement a privileged target,’ said Matthieu Bloch, rapporteur of a National Assembly inquiry into parties and Islamist networks, in December 2025….

“Polls ‘all show [Mélenchon] losing massively in a run-off against Le Pen,’ noted the BBC.”

So far, around 2,000 students have been arrested and more than 1,000 schools affected. The violence has included “schools set on fire and teachers beaten and doused in petrol.”

French President Emmanuel Macron, who is serving his second term of office and cannot run again, is ending his presidency facing widespread rejection from the public. According to a recent poll, only 21% support his policies, although up from 19% a few months ago.

Macron’s numbers are not surprising. He has repeatedly shown contempt for the poorest members of French society.

A few weeks into his first term, which began in May 2017, he spoke of “those who made it” and “those who are nothing.” Less than a year and a half later, in November 2018, while citing anthropogenic climate change, he raised France’s already exorbitant gasoline taxes, a move that immediately triggered the “Yellow Vests” movement, when thousands of French citizens said they could no longer afford both the fuel to travel to work and the food to feed their families. Macron replied that while some people might struggle with money, he must take care of something more important: “the risk of facing the end of the world”.

The Yellow Vests movement lasted more than a year — subsiding only in January 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout, Macron remained contemptuous, responding to the grievances of nonviolent protestors with police crackdowns inflicting deaths and mutilations. Meanwhile, he permitted left-wing agitators who had infiltrated the movement to riot and commit arson without asking the police to intervene. Many in France saw that Macron could be pitiless toward people expressing their distress, but lenient toward criminals so long as they were of his preferred political bent.

During the pandemic, Macron initiated some of the most authoritarian measures in Europe. The French were ordered to stay indoors and leave their homes for only one hour a day — within a half-mile radius — provided they filled out a form stating their name, address, and time of departure. The police, omnipresent, arrested thousands and fined them heavily simply for venturing slightly beyond the permitted distance or lingering a bit longer than one hour. All conversations outdoors were strictly prohibited.

The Macron years were additionally marked by a profound economic decline in France and a severe drop in the standard of living. For the past decade, France’s per capita wealth has fallen below the EU average and now trails behind that of Cyprus. Ten years ago, in 2016, France’s GDP per capita was globally ranked at 23; today, it ranks at 33. The unemployment rate, now at 8.3% , is increasing. For people between the ages of 15 and 24, it is an extremely high 21.1%.

Deindustrialization continues full-on. Punitive regulations have caused factories to close. They are replaced not by other businesses but by an increasingly costly welfare system, which now accounts for more than 40% of total public spending. In 2025, the poverty rate in France climbed to 15.4%, representing 9.8 million people living below 60% of the national median income and struggling every month just to meet their basic needs.

At the same time, successive French governments have pumped up spending without restraint. While the GDP growth in France from 2016 through 2026 was 13.17% in total, the increase in public spending in the same period was 35.6%. This enormous difference means that the government continues to spend far more than it raises in revenue. The national debt, which has grown continuously, reached 117.5% of GDP in January 2026, and will reach 119.3% by the end of the year. Interest payments on the debt have been devouring an increasingly large share of the country’s annual budget and, as in the United States, now exceed the national defense budget. The difference is that the US may still be able to grow its way out of such a hole — $40 trillion, with interest at $7.1 billion a day — whereas France, crushed by overregulation, cannot.

On another front, while Macron, in 2020, denounced “Islamist separatism,” he has done nothing to prevent, or even slow down, the Islamist conquest of France. For a decade, the full-powered Islamization of the country has stormed on. Millions of people from the Muslim world have settled in France, both legally and illegally. Around 2016, the approximate number of Muslim citizens and foreign Muslims living in France was 5.7 million (8.8%); now, officially, it is estimated at possibly 7 million out of a population of roughly 67 million, but the real figures are undoubtedly higher. Most Muslims in France do not assimilate, and a growing proportion — roughly 38% — place Islamic sharia law above the laws of the Republic (the figure is higher among Muslims aged 15 to 24: 57%).

Laws against illegal immigration are not enforced. Every year, only 7% of illegal aliens in France who were notified by the police to leave — by the OQTF (Obligation to Leave French Territory) — are expelled. This laxity means that more than 93% remain in the country. Many are criminals. Some of the most sickening murders in France during the Macron years have been committed by illegal aliens who had ignored their OQTF. Lola Daviet, age 12, for instance, was raped, tortured, and murdered in a Paris apartment by an Algerian thief and occasional prostitute, Dahbia Benkired. On August 21, 2022, Benkired had been arrested, issued an OQTF, and then released. Two months later, on October 14, she murdered the child.

No-go zones, where radical imams and Muslim gangs hold sway, have grown since 2016. They now featured in the suburbs of the major cities of France. Muslim gang members raid and go looting several times a year, especially when there is sports match with a French soccer team, and recently during the 2025 World Cup. The police have orders to intervene only minimally. If they hurt or kill a Muslim criminal, they have seen that their careers and lives can be destroyed. On June 27, 2023, Nahel Merzouk, a young Muslim criminal, refused to obey to a police officer, who then shot him by accident. Riots, which erupted all over the country, only began to calm when the police officer, Florian M., was placed in pre-trial custody and charged with first-degree murder. He now faces up to 20 years in prison.

“Right-wing” anti-Semitism has largely vanished, and it has been replaced by an exceptionally venomous Islamic and left-wing anti-Semitism.

After Hamas’s October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel, Islamic and leftist protests in support of Hamas and “Palestinian resistance” were organized within days. La France Insoumise described the October 7 massacre as an “armed offensive by Palestinian forces” without ever mentioning that Hamas is a terrorist movement. One of the leaders of LFI, Rima Hassan, a French citizen, defines herself as “French-Palestinian”, not French. She constantly falsely accuses Israel of “genocide” and claims that that “Hamas’s actions are legitimate.”

The massive surge of antisemitic assaults, threats, and insults has lasted until today.

In recent years, Macron has also been increasingly targeting freedom of expression, making use of Arcom — an institution he created in 2022 to regulate and control French audiovisual media — to do so. In 2025, Arcom shut down the television channel C8: the stated reason was a “lack of pluralism,” and that too many conservatives had been invited to speak. On June 15, 2026, another television channel, CNews, received a formal notice from Arcom, also accusing it of a “lack of pluralism“. CNews could soon shut down as well. It is the last major television channel in France that still invites right-of-center commentators whom other channels no longer invite. CNews was fined twice in 2026: once because a guest stated that anthropogenic global warming does not exist; another time because a guest stated that “history shows that Islam is still a religion of conquest.”

In December 2025, France requested that two commentators — Jacques Baud and Xavier Moreau — be sanctioned by the European Union for their “pro-Russian remarks.” Their bank accounts and assets within the EU were frozen, and their credit cards cancelled. They are no longer permitted to travel within the EU. Any financial assistance provided to them by anyone would be subject to sanctions. These measures are extrajudicial, but there is no avenue of appeal or recourse.

In May 2024, Macron’s political party, Renaissance, lost the European Parliament elections. While France’s main right-wing party, Rassemblement National (National Rally), received 31.37% of the vote, Macron’s received only 14.6%. He spoke angrily about the result, dissolved the National Assembly and called for snap legislative elections. In the first round, the National Rally received more than 33% of the votes and was about to win a majority of the seats in the second round. Macron quickly created an alliance of all other political parties aimed at defeating the National Rally. He spoke of a “republican front,” and implied that the National Rally is a danger to the republic. Voters supporting centrist or moderate-right candidates were encouraged to vote for a left-wing candidate if that candidate was best positioned to win. Voters supporting left-wing candidates were encouraged to vote for a centrist or moderate-right for the same reason. The result was that the National Rally secured the largest share of votes, but the “republican front” parties received the largest number of seats in the National Assembly, which was fragmented into multiple parties, none of which could form a coherent majority. Since then, the country has had several powerless governments, and no important decisions could be made. Macron made the country ungovernable.

Macron might want a successor who would continue his programs, such as they are, but that does not seem about to happen. Marine Le Pen, for the first time in her political career, leads in polls, which indicate that in 2027 she could win. Other candidates belong to parties that are now associated with the disaster into which France has plunged.

Le Pen was even prosecuted for allegedly allowing parliamentary assistants of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) from her party to work in Paris for the MEPs who employed them. When centrist candidate François Bayrou and left-leaning Jean-Luc Mélenchon were accused of the same offense, the charges against both were dropped. Not for Le Pen. On March 31, 2025, she was sentenced to four years in prison and a five-year ban from holding public office, presumably to prevent her from becoming a candidate.

After she appealed the verdict, on July 7, 2026, her sentence was reduced to three years in prison — one year of which was to be served under house arrest, wearing an electronic monitoring tag — and a 45-month ban from holding public office, 30 months of which were suspended. The new ruling enables her to run for office. She has lodged an appeal with France’s highest court and execution of the judgment has been suspended. She will not have to wear the monitoring tag during the election campaign. The court is scheduled to issue its ruling on her appeal before the election and could reverse its decision. Le Pen would then be required to wear a monitoring tag during the final days of her campaign and, should she be elected, at the Élysée Palace upon taking office.

All of her legal troubles, however, appear to have had no effect on her voters, who appear to understand that justice in France has now been politicized.

If Le Pen is elected president in the spring, the shockwaves will be heard across Europe. A Le Pen presidency would mean a victory for a political party that champions Western civilizational values — a party that every incumbent leader in Western Europe — except Italy’s Giorgia Meloni — seeks to keep out of power by any means necessary.

The economic, financial and social situation Le Pen would face in the event of her victory would be harsh. All available data indicate that France is almost bankrupt at almost every level. A recovery will be highly complex and difficult.

Most leaders of LFI have already declared that they would refuse to accept a Le Pen victory: if she wins, they would call for an insurrection. Several political analysts think that in such an event, widespread riots involving leftist groups and Islamist gangs might break out across the country.

Several other French politicians attempting to stoke panic will do so with increasing intensity right up until the election. It is not at all certain that these obstructions would be enough to defeat Le Pen.

A recent poll commissioned by the center-right Foundation for Political Innovation shows that 78% of voters believe that “the French way of life, its traditions, and its lifestyle habits are under threat.” Available data indicate that, unfortunately, this is true. Another recent poll shows that 85% of voters think France is in decline. They are quite right. France is in sharp decline and large majority of the French see it.

The situation in France differs little from the general situation elsewhere in Western Europe. The policies pursued in most other Western European countries do not fundamentally differ from those adopted by Macron — and lead to the same results.

Many other Europeans are just as dissatisfied with their leaders as are the French. They all see the economic destruction, the ongoing Islamization of their countries, the threat from China to undercut their automobile industries, and the growing impossibility of discussing certain subjects without being demonized or put on trial.

Many Europeans see Islamization gaining ground in their countries and enjoying support from Marxists: each thinks the other will bring it to power. They see their leaders doing nothing to remedy a situation that has become increasingly alarming. They appear to prefer having their Western civilization protected and saved.

Political parties in Western Europe with platforms close to that of Le Pen’s National Rally, such as Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), are gaining momentum despite attempts by leaders in power and the media to demonize them.

On September 6, 2026, in a state-level election in Germany’s Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD won 43.8% of the vote — twice as much as five years earlier. In May 2025, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz came to power at the head of a grand coalition united solely by the desire to halt the rise of the AfD. His coalition did nothing to combat Germany’s deep industrial slowdown and the growing non-integration of Muslims living in the country. The situation is now worse. Merz is currently more unpopular in Germany than Macron is in France (only 14% of Germans consider him worthy of holding the office of Chancellor). The AfD is now the most popular party nationwide in Germany. A recent poll puts its support at a record 30%.

In the UK, in May 2026, the Reform Party won many local and municipal elections, inflicting heavy defeats on both the ruling Labour Party and the Conservative Party. Recent polls indicate that if an election for Parliament were held today, it would secure the highest number of seats.

A political groundswell in Western Europe is taking shape. Most mainstream media commentators dismissively label it “populist.”

“What they call populism,” wrote Éric Zemmour, former columnist and president of the right-wing Reconquest party, “is the cry of people who do not want to die.”

gatestoneinstitute

“The Motive is Islam”: Airline Pilot Explains Cause of Hijackings to Shocked Newscaster

Not the answer the media was looking for.
Medforth AI

I’m guessing that Australia’s ‘News24’ “Trusted News First” is not going to have Captain Byron Bailey, an experienced airline pilot and former RAAF (Royal Australian Air Force) pilot back after they brought him on to explain what happened in the FlyDubai hijacking.

Well, the good captain explained.

This might not have been the explanation that News24, which covered the attempted suicide hijacking as “Israel-bound flight with 150 on board diverted to Saudi Arabia after brawl between pilots”, and whose current stories include headlines such as “Palestinian killed in second straight day of settler violence”, was looking for.

Too bad. Its viewers got a good humored dose of truth anyway.

frontpagemag

FlyDubai hijacker studied at British University for three years

The co-pilot who has been accused of trying to hijack a Flydubai plane enrolled at a British university, it has been revealed | LINKEDIN: HAMMAM AL-HAMMAMI

The co-pilot who has been accused of trying to hijack a Flydubai plane enrolled at a British university, it has been revealed.

Omani national Hammam Al-Hammami, 29, attempted to carry out a “terrorist” attack during the flight after he is said to have struck the pilot with a crash axe and attempted to take control of the aircraft, the United Arab Emirates’ prosecutor general said this morning.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Al-Hammami was banned from flying last year due to concerns over his radical ideological views.

He is also said to have been working at Flydubai for just eight months, according to an Israeli official.

However, it has now emerged that he attended Buckinghamshire New University, where he took part in a three-year learning course in aviation management.

Al-Hammami completed a distance-learning course and graduated from the university in 2023, though he did not take pilot training at the university, a spokesman told GB News.

“Our thoughts are with the injured pilot, crew and passengers involved in this incident,” the spokesman added.

His LinkedIn profile shows he previously worked at Oman Air while studying at the university. According to CNN, he was removed from his role over concerns about his extremist ideology.

The outlet also claims to have seen deleted social media posts from Al-Hammami, in which he bemoans not being able to find a wife who will wear a niqab and stop working after marriage.

ABC News report the 29-year-old had allegedly been found in possession of extremist material during his time as a trainee pilot, and Al Arabiya say Omani authorities believe he may have spent time in Syria, where he could have been influenced by radical groups.

The incident occurred on Wednesday, September 30, when Flydubai Flight FZ1073, travelling from Dubai to Tel Aviv with 182 people on board, diverted over Jordanian airspace towards Saudi Arabia after suddenly plunging over 14,000ft in less than 30 seconds.

Passengers and crew, including an off-duty British pilot, managed to tie up and stop the alleged attacker before stabilising and landing the jet.

All passengers, including Al-Hammami, who is now in custody in Saudi Arabia, survived the incident.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Daily Mail he was “amazed” by the bravery of the passengers on board.

Horrifying videos circulating online appear to show the passengers gaining entry into the cockpit, where the pilot, Smit Machchhar, had been stabbed.

Distressing footage depicts the captain bloodied and clutching his chest, as passengers applied pressure to the wound.

It also appears to show Al-Hammami tied up and receiving oxygen.

Speaking to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on a video call, Mr Machchhar described how, despite his injuries, he was able to open the door from the inside and allow passengers to enter the cockpit.

“I was lying on the floor injured but I told myself to go for one last push to open the door from inside,” he explained.

“Others came in and also played a role [in controlling the situation].

“I was of course fighting for my own life but at the same time I knew I was not going to let others die.”

The Indian embassy in the UAE said yesterday that Capt Machchhar was “in good health and recovering well”.

gbnews

Hungary: Unprecedented Political Purges Continue as Operetta Theater Director Suspended

Atilla Kiss-B., Director General of the Budapest Operetta and Musical Theater, is being relieved of his duties for the duration of a professional and ethical review at the theater, the Ministry for Social Relations and Culture announced Tuesday, reported Magyar Nemzet.

“The Ministry for Social Relations and Culture is launching an internal review regarding professional and ethical matters at the Budapest Operetta Theater, effective today. The decision follows the receipt of numerous employee complaints and professional concerns regarding the institution’s operations in recent times. After reviewing these reports, the Ministry… deems it necessary to conduct an objective and detailed investigation into the issues raised,” reads the statement.

The Ministry added that to ensure the review is conducted impartially, thoroughly, and without interference, Atilla Kiss-Balbina—director general of the Budapest Operetta Theater—is being relieved of his work obligations for the duration of the investigation. Zoltán Tarr, TISZA’s Minister of Culture, considered to be one of the Magyar regime’s chief ideologues, initiated an investigation into the affairs of the Budapest Operetta Theater last week. This move follows an escalating conflict over recent months between the theater’s management and a portion of the company.

Although protesting artists deny this, the entire affair is perceived by the wider public to center around political loyalties, and is indeed interpreted along ideological fault-lines. A group of artists are dissatisfied with the fact that János Dénes Orbán (no relation to the former PM), a prominent Transylvanian playwright, was paid by the Carpathian Basin Talent Support Nonprofit Ltd. (KMTG)—founded by the author himself—for the usage rights to nine of his plays for over 412 million forints (EUR 1.1 mil.) in public funds, and also that the Operetta Theater has paid him at least 129 million forints (EUR 350.000) in royalties since 2023 for various translations and operetta librettos.

Attila Kiss-B. Photo: Facebook Operettszínház

In July, more than fifty employees stated in an open letter that they had lost confidence in Attila Kiss-B.’s leadership and called on the director general to distance himself from János Dénes Orbán. In his response, the director general said that while he understood the company’s outrage — the royalties paid being seen as relatively high by Hungarian standards — he did not accept that the leadership had lost the staff’s trust. A group of artists is now calling for Kiss-B.’s departure.

In a democratic society, politically active artists demanding that their director distance himself from someone they disagree with would not normally justify suspending a theater director pending an internal investigation.

Attila Kiss-B. is the longtime director of the Budapest Operetta Theater (Budapesti Operettszínház), and a Kossuth Prize-winning opera singer who was appointed to the post in 2019. He is simply perceived as an Orbán-era appointee by the company’s artists, and has faced strong animosity from some of the employees from the outset. He publicly framed his work as being in line with the previous government’s cultural policy of promoting national values and Hungarian culture. In the past, he has occasionally attended events where PM Viktor Orbán was present, and has refused to join the dominant FIDESZ-bashing rhetoric prevalent in artistic circles, or indeed to actively signal his sympathies towards Péter Magyar’s TISZA party.

Kiss-B’s removal follows a widespread pattern of replacing FIDESZ-era officials on every level or every segment of Hungarian public life and institutions, and replacing them with TISZA government loyalists or prominent left-wing activists. 

hungarytoday