Sex, Drugs and Magyar: Globalist Candidate in Hungary is Filmed Having Sex at Drug Party, Alleges To Be Victim of Kompromat Operation

Peter Magyar caught having sex in drug-fueled party, blames Orbán and… the Russians.

Magyar’s lifestyle is coming back to haunt him.

The upcoming elections in Hungary are on fire, as the Globalist candidate Peter Magyar finds himself again the focus of a sex and drug scandal targeting his lifestyle choices.

Yesterday (12), Magyar admitted that, back in August 2024, after he was elected to the European Parliament, he attended a ‘drug-fueled party’ in Budapest where he was filmed having sex.

The incident occurred less than two months after the ‘Tisza leader’s disco scandal’, when an intoxicated Magyar hit a man at a nightclub, taking his phone and throwing it into the Danube.

Magyar publicly apologized for the scandal, but did not change his lifestyle.

Euronews reported:

“Péter Magyar has claimed his former girlfriend lured him into a compromising situation and rejected allegations of drug use, saying Viktor Orbán’s government is using secret service methods to smear him.

Hungary’s opposition leader Péter Magyar has admitted he was lured into a ‘honey trap’ by his former girlfriend, and has rejected allegations of drug use. Magyar says Viktor Orbán’s government orchestrated the operation using secret service methods.”

Magyar is the Globalist golden boy that the Brussels Globalists and Ukrainian secret services have unleashed to get rightwing leader Viktor Orbán out of power.

Back on Tuesday, photos of a room with a bed with a tray with what appears to be cocaine began circulating online, connected to a sex tape featuring Magyar.

“In a social media video shared Thursday afternoon, the opposition leader admitted he visited the apartment in the picture in August 2024 after a party, and had consensual sex with his ex-girlfriend.

’That night I didn’t realize that I was facing a secret service operation, so I let myself be seduced’,” Magyar said. ‘But later I realized that I had walked into a classic Russia-style compromising [kompromat] situation. But since I had not done anything illegal, my conscience is clear’.”

thegatewaypundit

France: Antifa thugs beat young man into brain death (UPDATE)

The victim Quentin D., screenshot X/ visegrad24

A member of Nemesis‘s security team is in critical condition after being attacked in Lyon by members of the Antifa group Jeune Garde. The incident occurred during a protest against a conference led by far-left politician Rima Hassan. According to reports, around 15 security staff who arrived to protect female activists from Collectif Némésis were attacked by some 40 Antifa militants from Jeune Garde, a group associated with Raphaël Arnault, who was also present at the event.

X

A security guard accompanying female activists from the right-wing feminist group Collectif Némésis has been left brain-dead after violent clashes in Lyon linked to protests surrounding an appearance by La France Insoumise MEP Rima Hassan, according to the group, as prosecutors opened an investigation into aggravated assault.

The Lyon prosecutor’s office confirmed Friday that an investigation had been launched immediately following the events.

“At this stage, the context and circumstances of these events must be determined,” judicial authorities said.

Hassan had been invited to speak on Thursday evening at the Institute of Political Studies during a conference titled “Relations between the European Union and European Governments in the Context of the Middle East Conflict.” Students reportedly greeted the French-Palestinian MEP with a standing ovation inside the venue.

Outside, activists from the Collectif Némésis collective gathered to protest Hassan’s visit. According to security sources cited by ActuLyon, tensions escalated around 6:30 p.m. when another group confronted demonstrators, leading to clashes. Videos shared online show chaotic scenes, including attempts to seize banners and at least one woman being knocked to the ground.

According to Collectif Némésis leader Alice Cordier, members of the group’s security detail were then attacked.

“A member of our security is between life and death after the Lyon action. He was lynched by the Jeune Garde Antifa,” Cordier wrote on social media.

“The anti-fascists knocked him to the ground and beat him, leaving him for dead in the street. Quentin was swept to the ground, his head struck the pavement, and he was then lynched with kicks,” a statement from the organization read.

“His attackers were masked, armed with reinforced gloves and tear gas, leaving little doubt about the premeditated nature of their attack,” it added.

Emergency services were later called to Quai Fulchiron in Lyon’s 5th arrondissement around 7:40 p.m. after reports that two young men in their twenties had been assaulted. One victim was transported to the hospital with minor injuries.

The second victim, aged 23, suddenly suffered severe medical complications. According to security sources, he collapsed while convulsing and required emergency intubation at the scene before being rushed to Édouard-Herriot Hospital.

He is understood to have suffered severe brain injuries consistent with a cerebral hemorrhage. On Friday, his condition was described as critical, and Collectif Némésis later stated he had been declared brain-dead.

Mayor Grégory Doucet condemned what he described as “the extremely violent brawl that took place yesterday,” adding, “Nothing can justify such clashes; I offer my full support to the victim and his family.”

Nationalist MEP Marion Maréchal, the niece of National Rally grandee Marine Le Pen, wrote that the young man had been “lynched by an Antifa commando,” blaming what she described as judicial and political complacency toward radical-left violence.

Reconquête leader Éric Zemmour added on X, “A member of the security team for the feminist Collectif Némésis is fighting for his life. He was reportedly beaten by militants from the Jeune Garde, a far-left movement founded by Raphaël Arnault, a close associate of Jean-Luc Mélenchon.”

The violence also comes days after lawmakers of the far-left La France Insoumise (LFI) published a statement opposing government moves to dissolve the Jeune Garde antifascist organization, arguing such measures threatened freedom of association and expression.

“At a time when racist crimes and offenses are multiplying in France, the priority of the Macronist government is to criminalize antifascist voices, just as it allows the international far right to come to power,” it had claimed.

“Jeune Garde is essential precisely because it helps prevent the creation of an electoral far right, against neo-Nazi groups increasingly violent in France,” it added.

rmx

Is Canada harvesting organs from live patients?

Illustration AI generator

by Eric Utter 

Apparently, the law in New Brunswick, Canada, pertaining to organ donations reads:

The Chief Coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue after the death of a person notwithstanding that death has not yet occurred if, (a) in the opinion of a physician the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or disease …

… along with a couple of other requirements.

“Notwithstanding that death has not yet occurred?”

What kind of verbiage is that?

Translated from the leftist legalese claptrap this means, “even if the person is still alive.” Has Canada gotten so cozy with communist China that it is replicating what the CCP does to the Uyghurs and members of Falun Gong? Forced organ “harvesting” is kind of a big deal … or should be.

I myself have been diagnosed with a terminal disease, though my expected demise may not technically be “imminent.” I think I’m as generous as the next guy, but all things considered I’d like to keep my heart, lungs, liver, skin, et al., until I have truly and unquestionably checked out. This doesn’t seem like too much to ask.

When we start down the road of cheapening life, a path on which we sadly embarked long ago, it gets continually easier and less controversial to do so over time. Legalize abortion. Then call it “women’s health care.” Then legalize it up to the moment of birth.

And maybe well after birth, via ever-expanding Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) programs like Canada’s. MAID is no longer limited to those whose death is imminent. Anyone in long-term pain, physically and mentally, may be eligible to have their lives snuffed out.

“Black Horse,” a Canadian commentator and BlazeTV contributor, told BlazeTV host Auron MacIntryre that, in 2024, “over 16,000 people were killed via MAID” and notes that it is a “radically expanding program.” And a rapidly expanding one.

I wonder how many “undocumented migrants” have been exterminated via MAID? Unfettered abortion of native Canadian and American kids, and the rapidly expanding practice of helping sick and stressed-out citizens die, juxtaposed against the importation of many millions of illegal aliens might almost make one think that the Great Replacement Theory is more than a theory.

That’s because, like most recent “conspiracy theories,” it is far more fact than fiction.

When espousing a pro-life message can get one threatened with criminal charges but assisting someone in dying– or getting a jump on harvesting their organs– is afforded legal protection … the prognosis for that society is terminal. And its death may well be imminent.

americanthinker

‘Trans Women’ Are Women, EU Parliament Says

Men who identify as women should not only be included in all the EU’s feminist policies—the recognition of their ‘right’ to be treated as women should also be defended as a priority. That’s the recommendation from the European Parliament to the Council, approved this Thursday in the Strasbourg plenary.

The text was adopted with the support of the left-wing groups and, stunningly, by the majority of the supposedly center-right European People’s Party (EPP).

A proposed amendment stating that “only biological women can become pregnant” was rejected after 233 MEPs voted against it, with 200 for and 107 abstentions.

The initiative comes from a report prepared by Socialist MEP Lina Gálvez (S&D), which proposes that the EU’s external actions should make the legal recognition of self-perceived gender identity a top priority and reflect this in its equality policies. The document also argues that the EU should actively promote this position in international forums and in its dialogue with non-EU countries. An interesting proposition, in particular when it comes to diplomatic engagement with Muslim or outright Islamist countries like Syria. 

Although formally a recommendation to the Council and not a directly binding rule, the text sets out a political position that could influence diplomatic action and shape future legislative initiatives.

Specifically, the report calls for ensuring the recognition of “trans women” as women and their full inclusion in all strategies and programs linked to gender equality.

Criticism from conservative groups

The decision immediately drew criticism from groups on the right side of the chamber. VOX MEP Hermann Tertsch said that the Eurochamber “has adopted as an international priority an ideological agenda that redefines the concept of woman and imposes it as the Union’s official position.” In his view, the recommendation effectively becomes a diplomatic guideline—“a concept based on gender identity that does not enjoy consensus in numerous member states.”

The Patriots for Europe group also denounced that, despite being the third largest force in Parliament, it was excluded both from the prior negotiations of the text and from the official mission that will travel to the UN Commission on the Status of Women in New York in March.

The vote comes at a time when the European Union is facing significant economic, geopolitical, and internal cohesion challenges. The decision to prioritize the recognition of gender identity in its external action reflects persisting blindness to the real issues facing Europe’s populations and intransigence regarding an ideology that is rejected by the majority of EU citizens. 

The recommendation approved in Strasbourg has no immediate legal effects, but it reinforces a political direction that is likely to continue generating controversy inside and outside the European Parliament.

In the coming months, the Council will have to take a position on the proposed guidelines in a context where issues relating to gender identity, fundamental rights, and the definition of equality policies continue to divide governments, parties, and societies in several member states.

europeanconservative

Europe bans ketchup and mayonnaise sachets starting in August

GROK

Starting in August 2026, a new European Union regulation will come into effect that prohibits the use of individual sachets in bars, restaurants and hotels.The measure applies to condiments such as ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, salt, sugar, and oil served on the premises.

The change, as foreseen in the regulations (EU) 2025/40 is part of the community strategy to reduce plastic waste and promote more sustainable consumption practices in the hospitality sector.

According to the approved text, the establishments They should replace single-use dispensers with reusable dispensers or shared containers.The goal is to eliminate the unnecessary use of disposable packaging for meals consumed on-site.

The regulation, known as Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)It establishes a transition schedule until August 2026. The intention is to give operators time to adapt gradually, avoiding abrupt impacts on the operation of establishments.

This measure marks the beginning of a series of restrictions that are expected to expand in the coming years. European Comission It is predicted that, by 2030, the ban on single-dose packaging will extend to other food products, cosmetics, and personal hygiene items.

A full assessment of the policy is scheduled for February 2032. At that stage, the Commission should evaluate the results obtained, especially regarding waste reduction and the protection of public health, the newspaper says.

Il Messaggero

British actress Olivia Colman claims she has always felt like a ‘gay man’

Olivia Colman, Wikimedia Commons, Raph_PH, CC-BY-2.0

Oscar-winning actress Olivia Colman has announced that in her marriage – to husband Ed Sinclair – she identifies as a gay man. Colman is one of the U.K.’s most famous actresses and lauded for roles such as Queen Elizabeth II in The Crown. She is currently promoting her latest project, the “queer film” Jimpa, in which she plays the mother of a “nonbinary” child.

The recently invented term “nonbinary” refers to someone who claims to be neither male nor female and often uses “they/them” pronouns. Colman claims that she, too, feels “nonbinary.”

“Throughout my whole life, I’ve had arguments with  people where I’ve always sort of felt nonbinary,” she explained in an interview with Them. “I’ve never felt massively feminine in my being female. I’ve always described myself to my husband as a gay man. And he goes, ‘Yeah, I get that.’ And so I do feel at home and at ease.”

Colman and her husband have three children and have been married for 25 years.

Colman’s comments highlight the irony of the identity grift: Because she apparently defines “feminine” as something other than female, she must insist that she feels “nonbinary” or like “a gay man” rather than simply admitting that there are many different ways of being female. Those seeking to escape stereotypes most often confirm them.

“I don’t really spend a whole lot of time with people who are very staunchly heterosexual,” the actress said. “The men I know and love are very in touch with all sides of themselves … I think with my husband and I, we take turns to be the ‘strong one’ or the one who needs a bit of gentleness. I believe everyone has all of it in them. I’ve always felt like that. I’m not alone in saying, ‘I don’t feel like it’s binary.’ And I loved that. I came away from making this film with, yeah, I knew I wasn’t alone.”

In summary: everybody is basically nonbinary. Or, conversely, nobody is.

Colman is a longtime LGBT activist; she was awarded her Oscar for Best Actress for The Favourite, in which her character (Queen Anne) has an affair with Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough. In the Netflix series Heartstopper, Colman played the mother of a bisexual teenager. Her latest film is directed by Sophie Hyde, who based the story on her own life and is open about the fact that this film constitutes LGBT activism:

My dad died in 2018, and he was like Jim in the film; a very eccentric, very provocative man, openly gay, an AIDS activist and health worker, and very publicly queer. I always knew him as someone who kind of put his body on the line and didn’t have much choice about whether he was political, but kind of went with it.

When he died, my child, who’s a trans nonbinary queer person, was really starting to come out and speak about their own queer identity. They were doing that quite publicly too. And I wish that they could sit down together and talk about it and talk about the hard stuff of that – how volatile it is and how much attacked you might be – but also the really great bits that you discover when you have that kind of reckoning with yourself and the world.

Colman emphasized that the film had helped her, as well. “I do think I learned an awful lot on the way as well,” she gushed. “Actually, I’m not sure that I spent so much time with anyone in the trans community before then, thinking about it, you know. Yeah, I did learn a bit, and I got better at pronouns as well.”

The term “nonbinary” first appeared around 1995 and it was rarely used until the 2010s. The trend of “preferred pronouns” was only used in “LGBT spaces” starting in the early 2000s, and again, was not pushed in the mainstream culture until the 2010s. Hollywood, however, is doing the heavy lifting to hold out against the backlash to trans activism – with Colman claiming that she identifies as a gay man just so she can feel like part of the “queer community” she spends so much time with.

lifesitenews

#JerkyGate: Epstein files talk ‘jerky’ meat, which appears to be code for human flesh

Image from Grok.

A few years back, I watched a documentary about the Wikileaks emails, and Liz Crokin, one of the main journalists pushing for answers, made one very profound statement, something to the effect of this: If these emails aren’t using coded language for heinous behavior, then explain what they’re talking about.

Why the nonstop talk about “cheese pizza?” How much “cheese pizza” does one person possibly consume? Endless “hot dog” parties? An email about a “handkerchiefs” with “a map that seems pizza-related” on it, asking where it should be sent? And for anyone who wants to bury their head in the sand and pretend this is all conspiracy, let’s not forget that it’s well established that pedophiles frequently talk in code: a leaked FBI document revealed the different symbols that pedophiles use to signal to each other what their sexual preferences in children are. Of course anyone involved in the ritual abuse of children is not going to speak plainly.

With that as a backdrop, what the hell is all the talk about “Jerky” (often with a capital J) in the Epstein emails, mentioned more than hundreds of times? The tone and language of some of the emails, particularly those sent from a man named Francis Derby, suggest something very, very evil. Worse, when you consider this: Derby is apparently a culinary entrepreneur, who opened several ventures under the name… “Cannibal.” Seems very in our faces.

JE, or Jeffrey Epstein, is going to “start eating regular food again” meaning he’ll be eating “less jerky?” I don’t know what “Jerky” means, but if it’s not code for something deeply sinister, then somebody needs to explain it to me. Who keeps jerky in in the freezer? Isn’t the whole selling point of jerky that it’s shelf stable? And if it’s really just something as innocent as “jerky” as you and I know it, then why redact the people involved….

For all the talk about “pizza” and “jerky,” the photos at meal times on Epstein’s island sure look gross—all I’ve seen is piles of what looks like bland meat. I thought they had private chefs, people…like Derby…. What kind of top chef presents jerky and “white tuna“ and grape soda as a meal?

Speaking of which, how about that “grape soda,“ as reported on by Vanity Fair? Rich people don’t drink grape soda. In fact, I’ve never met a single person in my life who drinks grape soda, nor have I ever tasted it myself, and I come from blue collar roots. The only people I would know who drink grape soda, if the stereotype is true, are poverty-level black people. So to see “grape soda” mentioned repeatedly makes one wonder.

I mean, the whole thing with this group of “elites” is they think they’re better than everyone else, superior and part of a master class. In fact, Epstein and others explicitly and derogatorally referred to us as “goy” and “goyim.” Why aren’t they feasting on caviar, Kobe beef, and foie gras? The best that the world has to offer in terms of culinary delights? Pizza? Jerky? Grape soda? Give me a break.

The billionaire class doesn’t drink grape soda, and they don’t eat jerky, which has always been a poor people’s food, using inexpensive, tough cuts of meat to make and drying them, making otherwise garbage cuts of meat palatable. Jerky is not a rich people food, and it never has been. Someone who slurs the “goyim” isn’t condescending to our level and eating our plebeian slop.

To suggest that the utter depravity and sadistic revelations seen in the newest tranche of Epstein files documents isn’t really a big deal and we’ve got bigger things to focus on, like how the stock market is hitting record highs as Pam Bondi said yesterday on Capitol Hill, is diabolical. Unless you’re like Bondi, and because this pillar of child-traffickers and pedophiles is load-bearing so you don’t want to bring it down, we need to get to the bottom of this and mete out justice.

I say bring on the Samson option.

americanthinker

Swiss Voters Go Up Against “Out of Touch” Elite in Migration Referendum

The Swiss government and parliament both oppose a proposal to cap the country’s population at 10 million until 2050 by limiting migration. But voters will have their own say this June after a petition linked to the ‘No to a 10 million Switzerland’ initiative crossed the 100,000-signature threshold needed to initiate a nationwide referendum in record time.

Establishment media outlets, including those outside of Switzerland, have focused in particular on the opposition from big business to this significant measure. But referendum backers from the right-wing Swiss People’s Party stressed on Wednesday that while “a small economic elite profits from uncontrolled immigration, the majority of the Swiss population suffers.”

Everyone feels the effects of uncontrolled immigration in their daily lives: The cost of living is constantly rising. Rents are skyrocketing. Crime is increasing. Schools are bursting at the seams. The landscape is being paved over. Trains are packed. Traffic jams are a constant problem. Switzerland is losing its identity. People feel like strangers in their own country.

“Our citizens,” added party representative Thomas Matter, “have had enough.” Polling suggests that the migration cap proposal has previously received almost 50% backing.

Switzerland’s population currently stands at around nine million, having steadily increased over recent years. If successful, the vote could result in it being made more difficult for foreigners to gain permanent residency once the population passes 9.5 million. It could also see Switzerland revise its agreement with the EU that (currently) allows for free movement, according to The New York Times.

The referendum will be held on June 10th.

europeanconservative

‘Nonce Party’: British PM Starmer Under Fire for Appointment of ANOTHER Paedophile-Tied Advisor

Prime Minister Keir Starmer with Peter Mandelson. Wikimedia Commons, Number 10, OGL v3.0

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is embroiled in another significant scandal over the appointment of another paedophile-linked advisor just days after barely surviving backlash over his government’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Downing Street has admitted that Prime Minsiter Starmer had nominated his former communications director, Matthew Doyle, to the House of Lords last year despite being aware that he publicly campaigned for a councillor charged with child pornography offences.

According to a December report from The Times of London, Doyle campaigned for Sean Morton in 2017 to represent Moray in Scotland, despite Morton having been suspended by Labour at the time after having been charged for possession and distribution of indecent images of children just months prior.

According to the paper of record, the images included naked pictures of girls as young as ten years old, as well as images of adults engaged in bestiality.

Despite being aware of the accusations against Morton, Doyle personally campaigned door to door while wearing a t-shirt reading “Re-elect Sean Morton”.

Doyle, who had previously campaigned for Hillary Clinton alongside Morton during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, said in December: “Sean Morton was maintaining his innocence at this time. I regret supporting him. Sean Morton was someone I knew for a period through other shared acquaintances. I have not seen him for years.”

Regardless, Number 10 admitted this week that Starmer and his top advisors were aware of his former communications director’s ties to Morton before the PM nominated Doyle to the House of Lords last year. However, Starmer attempted to shift the blame onto Doyle, saying on Wednesday that he did not “give a full account of his actions” and has since removed the whip from Lord Doyle.

The stance from Starmer is reminiscent of the one he took in the wake of the revelations concerning ties between his former ambassador to the United States, Lord Peter Mandelson, and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Despite having also been made aware that Mandelson had continued his close friendship with Epstein after the New York financier had been convicted over child prostitution, Starmer still chose to appoint the Blair-era spin doctor to the top diplomatic posting.

Nevertheless, Starmer attempted to shift blame, claiming that Mandelson had lied to him over the extent of his relationship and that the security services had failed to properly vet the longtime Labour Party operative.

Although Starmer survived the near collapse of his government last week over the scandal, with his cabinet rallying in support, it remains to be seen how long the Labour Party backbenches will stand by the embattled PM.

According to a report from POLITICO, an unnamed Labour MP said that party activists are being branded as “paedo lovers” as they seek to talk to their constituents on the doorstep.

Political opponents have been quick to seize on the scandal as well, with Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey remarking on Wednesday: “To appoint one paedophile supporter cannot be excused as misfortune; to appoint two shows a catastrophic lack of judgment.”

Leader of the official opposition Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, accused the Prime Minister of staffing his government with “hypocrites and paedophile apologists” and that Starmer “only cares about the victims when he’s trying to save his own skin”.

The co-leader of the far-left Your Party, Zarah Sultana, who left the Labour Party last year after accusing the government of complicity in genocide in Gaza, described her former party as simply the “Nonce Party”.

breitbart