A two-year-old girl was found dead inside a property on Pyrcroft Road in Chertsey on Thursday evening |1 Cowley Ave – Google Maps
A man has been charged with murder following the discovery of the body of a two-year-old girl at an address in Chertsey.
Officers were called to an address in Pyrcroft Road about 17:40 BST on Thursday, following reports of a concern for safety.
Kevin Kerjean, 31, has also been charged with the rape and sexual assault of a child under 13 and is due to appear at Guildford Crown Court on Monday.
Surrey Police had previously said the girl was three years old.
An investigation into the death remains ongoing and the force says it is not looking for anyone else in connection with the incident.
Kerjean was described by police as a French national who was born in the Central African Republic.
Det Ch Supt Jon Groenen said: “This is a tragic incident, and our thoughts are with the child’s family, as well as all those who knew her.
“Our teams are working hard to build a picture of what happened, and a significant police presence will remain in Pyrcroft Road over the coming days,” he added.
On Thursday, several bouquets of flowers were left at the entrance to Syward Place, an apartment complex located on the corner of Pyrcroft Road and Bell Bridge Road.
“We appreciate that the incident itself, as well as the significant police presence, will be concerning for residents,” said Groenen.
“We would like to thank them for their cooperation as we conduct our investigation.”
A far-left National Assembly member has sparked backlash after she gloated over the demographic decline of the native white French population in favour of immigrant groups, as the LFI continues to embrace Great Replacement ideology.
During a debate in the National Assembly this week on legislation intended to crack down on fraudulent or arranged marriages, MP Clémence Guetté of the radical leftist La France Insoumise (France in Rebellion/LFI) party, declared that alleged efforts to preserve the French ethnicity have failed.
“You have lost the racist ideological battle. Today, one in three French people is already linked to immigration,” she celebrated, according to Le Journal du Dimanche.
The deputy accused the populist National Rally party of Marine Le Pen and the conservative Union of the Right for the Republic (UDR) party of Éric Ciotti of seeking to protect the ” so-called native French” population, which she equated to “white French people”.
Guetté further claimed that the anti-fraud legislation was merely intended to “throw obstacles” in front of migrants who wish to “build their lives in our country, get married, start a family”, and take part in “today’s citizenship.”
It comes amid a broader move among La France Insoumise to openly embrace the concepts of “New France” and the “Great Replacement”, a term coined by French philosopher Renaud Camus, who accused Western elites of viewing citizens of their nations as interchangeable economic units that can be swapped out for less expensive, foreign alternatives with little consequence.
LFI leader and presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who has sought to bolster his party’s ranks with immigrant, and particularly Muslim populations within France, over the “boring” white native population.
Mélenchon has attempted to skirt a delicate line; on the one hand, he celebrates multicultural “New France”, and he has coyly taken to using the Great Replacement term on the campaign trail, while claiming that it merely refers to the natural transition from one generation to the next, rather than ethnic cleansing.
Upon the release last month of statistics from the National Institute of Demographic Studies (INED) in Paris, which found that one in three people had a connection to immigration, the Moroccan-born Spanish/Sicilian migrant Mélenchon declared that France is “our home,” in another apparent attempt to appropriate nationalist rhetoric.
The INED study, which questioned 27,000 people, found that roughly 13 per cent of the French population was born abroad, 11 per cent were the children of at least one immigrant, and a further 10 per cent had an immigrant grandparent.
The study provided perhaps the closest glimpse into the actual impact of immigration over the generations, given that France is officially a “colour blind” nation, meaning it does not track ethnicity in the census.
Guetté is not alone among LFI politicians to celebrate the declining white population of France, with Angolan Carlos Martens Bilongo, a member of the National Assembly for La France Insoumise, boasting last year, “If we’ve had more children than them, too bad for them,” while calling for minorities to continue outbreeding the French to “show them that we are more numerous and that we are more intelligent.”
‘My dear spectacular and special friend’: Fergie visited Epstein during his ‘sweetheart’ Florida incarceration in 2009
Epstein’s ‘sweetheart deal’ came with a ‘sweetheart work-release’ permit.
News arose today that disgraced former Duchess of York Sarah Ferguson visited Jeffrey Epstein twice at his ‘office’ for a ‘bogus firm’ he set up for work-release while imprisoned in Florida on a child sex offense.
When we say the firm was ‘bogus’ we are NOT passing judgment or trying to guess – Epstein himself characterizes it so in an email to Fergie: ‘250 south Australian suite 1404. ten minutes from airport. [The number and address for the fake office of the fake company, the Florida Science Foundation]’.
‘Fake office for the fake company’… Epstein could be brutally honest in some emails.
Ferguson met the convicted pedophile on two separate occasions at his Palm Beach ‘office’ that he used to leave jail every day ‘to work’ and only come back to sleep.
Sarah Ferguson met Jeffery Epstien twice while he was in prison for child sex offences.
The former Duchess of York met the paedophile on two occasions at the Palm Beach office of the fake company he invented to secure work release while in jail.… pic.twitter.com/FxfJllnZ4r
“Epstein victims have alleged in recent weeks that he abused them at the office on 250 South Australian Avenue while he was supposed to be in jail at the nearby Palm Beach County Stockade.
The sex offender was granted access to a generous work release program after he had been jailed for procuring a minor for prostitution in June 2008, which allowed him to leave his cell for up to 12 hours a day.”
Ferguson visited the convicted sex offender twice at his fake office during his incarceration.
Nine months into Epstein’s sentence, she wrote him asking to stop by for ‘a quick cup of tea’ during a layover in Florida.
She later called him ‘My dear spectacular and special friend’.
BREAKING NEWS: Sarah Ferguson visited Jeffrey Epstein twice at his office for a bogus firm he set up while imprisoned on a child sex offence.@TVKevpic.twitter.com/EEX0No5CK8
“The former Duchess of York has already faced a backlash after emails emerged earlier this year that suggested she had later visited Epstein with her two daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, when the pedophile was released from jail and placed under house arrest a month later, in July 2009.
‘Ferg and the two girls came’, Epstein told Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking girls and women to [him].”
When Fergie attempted to distance herself from Epstein years later, the disgraced financier joked that it was a ‘bold move’ for someone who had even visited him in jail on a child sex offense.
Germany is once again debating the possibility of banning Alternative for Germany (AfD). This time, the push comes not from a court ruling, nor from a direct government decision, but from an extensive legal report produced by the NGO Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (GFF). The organisation, whose name (ironically) translates as ‘Society for Civil Rights,’ argues that the party is unconstitutional as per Article 21(2) of Germany’s Basic Law.
The document, presented this week, was immediately used by leaders of the SPD and the Greens as an opportunity to reopen the debate over a ban procedure before the Federal Constitutional Court. The report is based on public sources: speeches, social media posts, party programmes, parliamentary motions, and statements by party officials.
Social Democratic leader Bärbel Bas called for the consideration of “legal steps,” while Green officials demanded progress toward a formal application against the party.
Formally, neither Bas nor the Greens can ban AfD. German law reserves that decision for the Constitutional Court. In addition, only the Bundestag, the Bundesrat, or the federal government can submit an application for a party ban. But it is clear that they do not want to miss the opportunity to turn an external report into institutional ammunition to further isolate a party that already competes as one of the country’s main electoral forces.
GFF accuses AfD of violating human dignity and the democratic principle. According to its authors, the party promotes an “ethno-cultural” concept of the German people, discriminates against citizens with a migrant background, and treats its political opponents as enemies of the democratic order.
The report also seeks to distinguish the AfD case from the NPD precedent, whose attempted ban failed in 2017 because the Constitutional Court found that the party labelled as neo-Nazi lacked any real capacity to impose its programme.
That is the key point. The NPD was marginal. AfD is not. It has representation in the Bundestag, in regional parliaments, and electoral support that, in several polls, places it close to or above the major traditional parties. Precisely for that reason, its opponents now present its democratic strength as a legal argument against it.
The offensive also comes at a time when AfD has questioned the role of NGOs financed directly or indirectly with public funds, and their influence over German political life.
The European Union famously accepted millions of refugees from other countries at war, the majority of which were military-aged males. Now, those protections will be ending for Ukrainian males who are fleeing conscription in Ukraine.
Magnus Brunner, EU commissioner for internal affairs and migration, announced that the European Commission proposes to extend temporary protection for Ukrainians until March 4, 2028, with the exception of people fleeing military service in Ukraine.
“To ensure this, temporary protection is not to be granted as a rule to newly arriving persons, who are not authorized by the Ukrainian authorities to leave Ukraine in view of their military obligations,” said Brunner. “This is what Ukraine has asked us to do, and this is what we are doing.”
He added that the European Commission’s proposal “takes into account Ukraine’s changing defense and reconstruction needs.”
Already, hundreds of thousands of young Ukrainian males have died at the front or been seriously wounded. However, Europe seems increasingly dedicated to funneling even more Ukrainian youth to the frontlines.
While the Ukrainian males already under protection will not have their protection dropped, military-aged males who arrive in the EU in the future will not be granted asylum rights.
At the same time, Denmark announced yesterday it will be the first country to no longer provide temporary protection to Ukrainian male refugees aged 23 to 60. The portal reminds that under Ukrainian law, men of this age do not have the right to leave the country without a valid reason.
Other Ukrainian groups, such as women, will continue to receive active refugee protections – a clear gender double-standard from the EU.
“Today we are presenting a proposal to extend temporary protection for another year – until March 4, 2028,” the commissioner announced.
George Soros predicted all of this
As Remix News previously reported, there was one man who predicted much of what has come to pass in the battle in the east of Europe: George Soros.
The billionaire oligarch financier, often portrayed as a humanist, promoted a hard-nosed geopolitical strategy in his 1993 piece entitled “Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO.” In the piece, he outlines how Eastern Europeans could be used as the “manpower” in coming conflicts in an effort to reduce the number of deaths in Western countries, which Soros argues the West would not politically tolerate, unlike the east of Europe.
“The United States would not be called upon to act as the policeman of the world. When it acts, it would act in conjunction with others. Incidentally, the combination of manpower from Eastern Europe with the technical capabilities of NATO would greatly enhance the military potential of the Partnership because it would reduce the risk of body bags for NATO countries, which is the main constraint on their willingness to act. This is a viable alternative to the looming world disorder,” wrote Soros in the article.
Notably, the body bags have piled up in Ukraine to an enormous degree, yet Europe’s chickenhawks want more men sent to the front. The EU’s latest decision to suspend asylum for Ukrainian males means all their talk of “protecting war refugees” turned out to be rather hollow. Cynically, the fact that these refugees are Europeans may play a large role in their decision, since the EU has never rejected asylum protection from those fleeing war for any other ethnic group.
Even to this day with the war over in Syria, European left-wing parties are racing to naturalize these migrants instead of sending them home to rebuild their countries. During the height of the war with Assad, there was also never serious effort to send Syrians back to fight him, either.
Even if the war ends, it remains unclear how many Ukrainian refugees will return to their country. Many of Ukraine’s women have already settled down in Western countries and even found new partners while Ukraine’s young males have been sent to die in waves in the east. Now, it remains unclear whether Ukraine’s population will ever recover, even in the most optimistic scenarios, following the war.
The EU and the business oligarchy running Ukraine also have a plan for that: import the Third World.
Not only are Ukrainians being forced to fight a war many of them no longer want to fight, but once they die, their country could very well be given away to Africans, Asians and Middle Easterners.
The left-wing Labour Party government will introduce a scheme to import fresh waves of supposed asylum seekers into Britain, modelled on the programme which brought hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians to the United Kingdom.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who was pitched to the public as an immigration hardliner when she was installed as the government’s top border official last year, is set to implement a new asylum route in which businesses, community organisations, and universities will be allowed to sponsor supposed refugees to come to the country, according to the BBC.
The Times of London, which broke the story, reported that the programme will be based on the Homes for Ukraine Sponsorship Scheme, which brought upwards of 200,000 displaced Ukrainians to the UK following the Russian invasion of their homeland in 2022.
The plan is being presented as a means of reducing the number of illegals who cross the English Channel on people smuggler small boats by offering prospective illegals “safe” and legal routes to enter the country.
It remains to be seen if the long-proposed leftist solution to the crisis will be effective, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer overseeing the largest number of illegal Channel crossings of any leader in recorded history.
The pitch for the scheme also comes amid questions over the future of Home Secretary Mahmood, with rumours swirling around Westminster that the likely future PM, Andy Burnham, may sack her over anger within the Labour Party over some of her immigration reforms, which have included setting a time limit on refugee status and increasing the number of years in the country needed to gain permanent residency from five to ten years.
Commenting on her new scheme, Mahmood said it would focus on protecting “genuine refugees” while “closing loopholes that have been too often abused”.
“Britain has always offered sanctuary to those fleeing war and persecution,” Mahmood said. “But this system only survives if the public trusts that it is fair, controlled, and not open to abuse.”
However, others were not convinced that Britain is in a position to continue taking in more migrants, given the influx of millions of foreigners since the start of the decade.
Conservative MP Katie Lam remarked: “So Shabana’s plan to stop illegal migration is…to just let everybody in? This mad plan will let ‘community groups’ sponsor migrants, meaning more chain migration – and if people can’t get in legally, they’ll cross the Channel anyway.”
“They’ll do anything but secure the border,” she said.
Meanwhile, there are reports that if given power, former Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham would scrap the limited restrictions imposed by Mahmood, including the additional time required to receive residency and access to Britain’s generous welfare state.
Reform UK Shadow Home Secretary Zia Yusuf warned that such a repeal would result in 2.2 million migrants being granted residence permits over the next few years and potentially putting the British taxpayer on the hook for £622 billion in handouts over the coming decades.
Yusuf has vowed to eliminate the Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) residency permits and replace them with an American-style five-year work visa system. The Nigel Farage-led party would also rescind residency for those dependent on the state, including those living in accommodations paid for by the British government.
Volkswagen is preparing what could be the most radical restructuring in its history, with CEO Oliver Blume reportedly planning to cut up to 100,000 jobs worldwide and close four German factories.
The proposals discussed at a recent management board meeting include shutting down production at the VW plants in Hanover, Zwickau and Emden, as well as Audi’s plant in Neckarsulm.
The plans would roughly double the previously announced target of around 50,000 job reductions, already called historic at the time due to its impact.
Volkswagen further aims to cut its planned investments by about 15 per cent to just over €130 billion over the next five years, according to Manager Magazin.
As part of the overhaul, the core Volkswagen passenger car brand is to be spun off from Volkswagen AG and turned into a legally independent company, separate from Porsche, Audi and the rest of the group.
The move is intended to make the brand more agile, simplify its structure and allow individual brands to be listed or sold more easily on the capital market in the future.
The measures are expected to be discussed by the supervisory board on July 9. While final decisions could still be watered down due to strong union representation, the scale of the proposed overhaul signals the depth of the problems facing Europe’s largest carmaker.
A Volkswagen spokesperson said he did not want to comment on “confidential documents”, but did say that “The entire group, including its brands and subsidiaries, must undergo far-reaching change.”
Volkswagen has been struggling for some time. In 2025 the group saw profits collapse by nearly 44–50 per cent amid weak demand, particularly for electric vehicles, intense competition from Chinese manufacturers, and high production costs in Germany.
Sales in China, once a major profit driver, have declined sharply, while the costly transition to EVs has not delivered the expected returns.
Adding to this, Chinese automakers are now encroaching the European market, reducing the share of traditional players such as Volkswagen.
The company has also faced pressure from US tariffs and a difficult European market.
These challenges have forced repeated rounds of cost-cutting.
Earlier plans to shed 35,000–50,000 jobs by 2030 are now considered insufficient.
VW’s core brand has been particularly hard hit, with persistent overcapacity in its German factories and margins under severe pressure.
The potential closure of four German plants would mark a historic turning point for Volkswagen, a company that has never before shut down a factory in its home country.
The affected sites employ tens of thousands of workers, and any closures would hit regions already sensitive to industrial decline.
Trade union IG Metall and the works council have reacted strongly, describing the plans as “irresponsible” and vowing stiff resistance.
Job security at Volkswagen has long been a cornerstone of the German social model, making this restructuring politically explosive.
Currently, Volkswagen employs over 667,000 people worldwide, 43 per cent of them in Germany.
Volkswagen’s difficulties are widely seen as symptomatic of deeper challenges facing German industry.
The latest proposals come as Germany’s automotive sector faces broader structural problems such as high energy costs, regulatory burdens from EU climate rules, and fierce global competition.
Polish nationals migrants are being urged by their own Government to apply for benefits in Britain before moving back home.
Warsaw has published guidance on its Powroty website, which supports citizens planning to return from overseas, highlighting that British welfare payments are higher than those available in Poland.
The official advice says: “When leaving the UK, it is worth considering whether you are eligible for Jobseeker’s Allowance.
“The UK unemployment benefit is higher than the equivalent benefit paid in Poland.
“It’s important to apply for it before leaving. Once you return to Poland, you won’t be able to start the benefits process.”
The website also gives detailed instructions on how to claim and transfer the payments.
Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Helen Whately blasted the situation, saying Britain’s welfare system has turned the country into an international “laughing stock”.
“Britain has become world-renowned for our soft-touch benefits handouts,” she told the Telegraph.
“When other nations are advising their own citizens on how to game benefits in the UK, it is clear how desperately broken our system has become.”
Under post-Brexit arrangements, EU citizens who secured settled status before December 2020 remain entitled to claim benefits for up to three months after moving to an EU member state.
It means individuals could receive hundreds of pounds from British taxpayers despite no longer seeking work in the UK.
A Government spokesman said: “The Withdrawal Agreement is a reciprocal arrangement negotiated by the previous Government, and it is not a mechanism to maximise claims on British taxpayers.
“As few as 10 people currently claim Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) outside the UK, according to official statistics.
“They can only receive it for three months at most and must have settled status pre-2020, have made sufficient National Insurance contributions and meet other eligibility requirements.”
Meanwhile, a spokesman for the Polish Government said: “Individual decisions to migrate back to Poland are based on grounds other than the possibility to receive a jobseeker’s allowance, including the one available under the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement to the eligible EU citizens who have lawfully paid insurance contributions during employment.”
The economic balance between Britain and Poland has shifted markedly in recent years.
Poland’s economy ranks among Europe’s strongest, with projected growth of 3.5 per cent this year compared to Britain’s 1.3 per cent.
Migration patterns have also reversed sharply since Brexit.
The Polish population in Britain surged from 94,000 in 2004 to nearly one million by 2016, but numbers have since declined.
Meanwhile, British emigration to Poland increased by 340 per cent between 2015 and 2024.
Common sense dictates that men don’t belong in women’s sports. Similarly, women don’t belong in men’s sports, especially as the most important person on the pitch — the referee.
I guess FIFA (soccer’s world governing body) has no common sense.
Yesterday, in a match between Ecuador and Germany, a female referee unfairly rewarded (not deservedly awarded) Germany with a goal that should not have stood. The overwhelming consensus is that a German player committed a foul in the lead-up to the goal. The female ref missed the obvious infraction.
Controversial decisions and every goal are reviewed by Video Assistant Referees. They stood by their woman. Perhaps their decision was tainted with chivalry rather than officiating consistency. Regardless, it was a horrendous call initiated by the female ref and then countenanced by overly deferential VAR refs.
The ref and her female-empowering coterie should woman-up and take responsibility. Rather, the DEI police are out in force as they emphasize VAR’s role in letting her call stand, while downplaying the awful initial call by the little lady in the middle. I bet a male ref with similar optical illusions would be castigated, but the standards for women are much lower.
We don’t want men in women’s sports, so what is the purpose of letting a woman participate in men’s soccer, anyway? And in the most important “position” of all? Besides her confounding decision-making, she offered no value above or beyond what a below-average male referee would contribute. In fact, in this match, she seemed to be touchy-feely, and that’s the last thing we want in this increasingly “delicate” sport. Motherly instincts belong in the home, not in the soccer cauldron.
The main commentator for the match was Ian Darke, who is eminently listenable for a Brit. However, his sidekick analyst was Landon Donovan, an ex-player. When, at the end of the match, Darke broached the sensitive subject of the female refs’ performance, Donovan’s reflexive response was incongruous with reality — he said it was really good. Huh?! Then he said, “I really mean it”; then I knew that he really didn’t mean it, but was probably following pre-production meeting orders to treat her delicately. What a wussy-whipped wanker.
At a men’s World Cup soccer match, women belong on the sidelines, preferably as cheerleaders or fetching refreshments.
Yesterday, Remix News reported that a 10-year-old boy has been charged with the stabbing and attempted rape of a 22-year-old woman in the French city of Saint-Brieuc.
However, updated reporting reveals that investigators believe he is at least 14 years old. Additionally, while his nationality was not previously provided, it was also revealed that he is a Congolese migrant who has been in France for approximately a year.
The incident began when a young woman was exercising in a wooded area of Saint-Brieuc on June 15. Public Prosecutor Julien Wattebled stated that “a male individual approached her and ordered her to undress, which she refused to do.”
The Congolese migrant then stabbed her twice, once in the arm and once in the abdomen, before fleeing, according to French news outlet Le Figaro.
Although first presented to the public as a mere schoolboy, the Saint-Brieuc public prosecutor’s office was suspicoius about the boy’s age, including based on identity documents that were presented. The prosecutor, Julien Wattebled, ordered bone morphology tests, which revealed he was at least 14 years old.
This difference could profoundly influence how the case is tried legally, as those younger than 13 cannot be subject to a criminal sanction or detention, while a minor aged 13 or older can, under certain conditions, be placed in pre-trial detention and face prison sentences.
If this new age is confirmed and retained by the courts, the investigating judge could refer the matter to the liberty and detention judge.
The Congolese migrant is not the only young person arrested for rape in France in recent days. In Villeurbanne, on June 17, in Feyssine Park, a 14-year-old male forcibly dragged a young woman into the bushes and then attempted to rape her. The woman began screaming, which scared off the perpetrator.
He was arrested shortly after the incident, resisted, and injured a police officer. He was initially placed in custody, but later released under judicial supervision, according to Ouest France.
