Allah's Willing Executioners

Algerian boxer Imane Khelif has confirmed he has a Y chromosome, indicating he is biologically male. In a new interview with French sports outlet L’Equipe, Khelif also admitted to having elevated testosterone levels, which he says he has been medically suppressing under the supervision of a doctor.

Khelif has been the subject of extreme controversy since the 2024 Paris Olympics, after Reduxx first revealed that he had previously been disqualified by the International Boxing Association’s (IBA) Women’s World Boxing Championships after failing a sex test. The news sparked a firestorm of backlash, with the IBA coming out in opposition to the Olympic’s decision to allow biological males to box against women in Paris.

Attempting to address the controversy, the IBA held a press conference in August of 2024, repeatedly confirming that Khelif had failed multiple chromosomal tests. The IBA also revealed they had been barred from releasing the results of those tests by the Algerian Olympic Committee. It is reported that during the press conference, BBC journalists walked out in support of Khelif.

Despite the IBA’s findings, the International Olympic Committee allowed Khelif to continue boxing in the women’s 66kg category, where he ultimately took gold.

🚨BREAKING🚨

Algeria's Imane Khelif has just beat Italy's Angela Carini in the Olympic Women's 66kg Boxing Preliminaries.

Carini forfeited the match in the first round.

Khelif was previously disqualified from a women's boxing championship for having "XY chromosomes." https://t.co/b1BcdCqMtf pic.twitter.com/SgqJU60bTu

— REDUXX (@reduxx) August 1, 2024

Since then, multiple leaked medical reports have been released, all of which indicate Khelif has a disorder of sexual development and is biologically male.

One leaked report, which was drafted in June of 2023 via a collaboration between the Kremlin-Bicêtre hospital in Paris and the Mohamed Lamine Debaghine hospital in Algiers, revealed that Khelif is impacted by 5-alpha reductase deficiency, a disorder of sexual development that is only found in biological males.

The genetic abnormality influences the normal development of a child’s sexual organs. At birth, male babies impacted are often incorrectly assigned female due to the presence of deformed genitalia that sometimes takes on the appearance of a “blind vaginal pouch.”  This disordered development typically becomes apparent by puberty, when impacted adolescents begin to experience signs of masculinization such as muscle growth, hair growth, and an absence of breast tissue development or menstruation.

In 2025, yet another test was leaked by Olympic press committee member Alan Abrahamson, confirming once again that Khelif has a male karyotype.

🚨A blood test leaked by Olympic press committee member Alan Abrahamson confirms that Algerian boxer Imane Khelif is male.

The test was conducted in 2023 at the request of the IBA, and resulted in Khelif being disqualified from the women's world boxing championship in New Delhi. pic.twitter.com/4JVJQDSd6a

— REDUXX (@reduxx) June 1, 2025

Khelif has now admitted to having XY chromosomes for the first time in a new interview with French sports outlet L’Equipe.

In the interview, Khelif confirmed he has the SRY gene carried on a Y chromosome. ‘SRY’ stands for Sex-determining Region of the Y, a gene that initiates typical male sexual development by triggering testes formation.

Khelif also clarified that he was not transgender and pointed to his upbringing as a ‘girl,’ stating: “I am not a trans woman, I am a girl. I was raised as a girl, I grew up as a girl, the people in my village have always known me as a girl.”

However, individuals with disorders of sexual development are not considered transgender, and without access to proper clinical examination, males with similar disorders of sexual development may incorrectly believe they are female into adulthood. Global health researchers have noted that rare developmental conditions are systematically under-diagnosed or misdiagnosed in low-resource countries – such as Khelif’s home of Algeria – for this reason.

As previously reported by Reduxx, Khelif’s coach had previously noted the boxer had been incredibly shocked by the results of his karyotype test in 2023 following his disqualification by the International Boxing Association.

In an exclusive interview with Le Point magazine in 2024, Georges Cazorla spoke of Khelif’s distress after being disqualified by the IBA, confirming that the biological tests had been carried out by the IBA that revealed that Khelif may not be female – something which appeared to blindside Khelif.

“The [disqualification] was based on tests. Frankly, I found it disgusting. Regardless of the results of these biological tests and, without going into detail – that is a matter for biologists and doctors – this poor young girl was devastated, devastated to suddenly discover that she might not be a girl,” Cazorla said.

Despite the admission by Khelif’s coach and the repeat medical record leaks confirming Khelif was biologically male, mainstream media outlets and activists continued to insist that Khelif was female and had simply been the victim of a “transphobic smear campaign” which targeted him because of his appearance.

In his interview with L’Equipe, Khelif expressed optimism about his career and insisted he intended to defend his Olympic gold in Los Angeles in 2028. But Khelif does not acknowledge that as a direct result of the controversy caused by his participation in Paris, World Boxing introduced mandatory sex testing for all boxers in its competitions last year. World Boxing is the international governing body for the sport, and is currently the IOC’s official partner federation for Olympic boxing.

Khelif has filed a complaint with the Court of Arbitration for Sport against World Boxing for its sex testing policy, but has said he would be willing to submit to sex testing “only if it is administered by the IOC.”

At this time, it is unclear if Khelif or the Algerian Olympic Committee have reached a quiet agreement with the IOC regarding his participation—possibly securing an exception that would allow athletes with disorders of sexual development to compete in their self-identified category. However, this is currently just speculation and no formal announcement of such an accommodation has been made.

As it stands, World Boxing’s policy explicitly restricts participation in the women’s category to biological females and, in November of 2025, the International Olympic Committee hinted that it would be adopting a similar policy intended to prevent males from participating in the women’s category in 2026.

While Khelif communicated that he was confident he will pass a sex test, he has previously exited competitions which required him to do so. He has also withdrawn Court of Arbitration for Sport appeals which would have likely required him to undergo a sex test to demonstrate his claims that he is biologically female.

reduxx

The socialist Spanish government’s amnesty scheme will allow illegal migrants to simply declare that they have no criminal record, rather than providing documentation from their native countries, sparking concern over criminals gaming the system.

Last month, the left-wing coalition government of Socialist PM Pedro Sánchez agreed to allow upwards of half a million illegals seek amnesty and obtain residence permits to remain in Spain.

While the scheme stipulates that amnesty will not apply to migrants with criminal records — other than the crime of entering Spain illegally — the regularisation decree published by the government this week revealed that Madrid will essentially be willing to take the word of illegal migrants about their past.

According to the ABC newspaper, an illegal will be able to make such a declaration if they can show that they have merely requested their criminal history from their country of origin or the country where they have resided in the past five years.

“If this information is not received within one month, the Administration will inform the interested party of this circumstance, who may submit a sworn statement of the absence of a criminal record,” the decree states.

Law enforcement sources told the paper that the system is bound to drive up migrant crime rates.

“Let’s not fool ourselves; if this information were requested from Spain by a third party, it would normally take us more than a month,” a police insider said. “The countries of origin aren’t going to have any special interest in cooperating… and that’s just talking about criminal records, not police records when there are many crimes that never go to trial, neither here nor abroad.”

Meanwhile, concerns have also been raised that the amnesty programme is creating a “pull factor” for more illegal immigration. The National Police have also reportedly noticed an influx of illegals residing in other European countries coming to Spain to try to take advantage of the amnesty scheme.

According to ABC, long lines witnessed in recent days outside of the Algerian consulate in Alicante were not a result of Algerians who live in Spain, but rather were in large part a result of illegals from France seeking to gain residence permits in the EU so they can return to France as legal migrants.

Despite the scheme potentially allowing more than two million foreigners to gain residence in Spain and, therefore, the ability to travel freely within the EU’s internal open border system, the Commission has so far refused to intervene to prevent the amnesty. This comes in contrast to the typically interventionist stance from Brussels towards domestic policies in conservative countries seeking to place limits on, for instance, abortion or LGBT education.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who lost the last election but remained in power after siding with Catalan separatists, has argued that the West must import more migrants to maintain its economies and public services.

However, the far-left Podemos party, with which he partnered to pass the amnesty programme, was more candid about their motivations, with Member of the European Parliament Irene Montero openly declaring that she wishes to “replace” her countrymen with foreigners.

“I wish for replacement theory, I wish we could sweep this country of fascists and racists with migrants, with working people,” she said last week. “Of course, I want there to be replacement: replacement of fascists, replacement of racists, replacement of freeloaders, and that we can do it with working people, whatever their skin colour may be.”

breitbart

We take a deep dive into the LATEST REVELATIONS and broader story around Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Jeffrey Epstein. Our guest is best-selling author and biographer Andrew Lownie, author of ENTITLED: The Rise & Fall of the House of York, the unauthorised biography of the former Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.

• 00:00:00 Intro
• 00:00:31 Scale of scandal and crimes
• 00:03:35 National security breaches
• 00:06:07 Kompromat, hidden cameras, Epstein, drugs, palace security 00:09:28 Sex trafficking, Russian influence
• 00:11:14 Andrew more extreme than Epstein
• 00:15:06 Death threats to author
• 00:18:21 Andrew central to Epstein operation
• 00:25:26 Was Epstein murdered?
• 00:27:39 How wealthy is Andrew?
• 00:30:22 Blair, Andrew, Kazakhstan, China
• 00:32:54 What does Andrew do now?
• 00:37:27 How damaging for the monarchy?
• 00:40:05 Mandelson’s role
• 00:44:15 The role of the Clintons

In Koblenz, activists associated with left-wing extremist groups attacked a public information event organised by the Christian pro-life initiative SOS Leben, resulting in injuries to two volunteers who later required hospital treatment.

The incident occurred on February 2, during a stop of SOS Leben’s “Pro-Life Tour.” According to reports cited by the organisers and local media, a group of counter-protesters described as belonging to the far-left spectrum attempted to disrupt the event by shouting slogans, damaging banners, interfering with the stand and even injuring participants. Objects were reportedly thrown, and confrontations ensued, during which two volunteers sustained injuries and were subsequently treated in hospital.

Police officers present at the scene intervened to prevent further escalation and arrested those responsible for the attacks. The event was able to continue only under police protection. At the time of reporting, authorities had not released further details on charges but confirmed that the incident was documented and is under investigation.

intoleranceagainstchristians

Every time an asylum seeker’s case is not processed on time in the Netherlands, that asylum seeker is getting paid late fees, with this sum reaching a record-breaking €79 million in 2025.

The latest figure shows a staggering increase from the €36.8 million paid in 2024. This information was revealed in the Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) agency’s annual figures released this Tuesday.

The agency is now calling for the Dutch government to abolish the practice of paying out asylum seekers with these late fees.

While the €79 million may not seem like an enormous figure, it only adds to the total €400 billion spent on migrants between 1995 and 2021, according to a landmark study from the University of Amsterdam.

In fact, one of the main problems facing the agency is that there are simply so many asylum seekers. The core of the issue lies in “exorbitant fines” triggered by massive backlogs. While the IND is legally mandated to process applications within six months, the average waiting time has now ballooned to 67 weeks.

Despite a slight dip in new applications last year, the total backlog grew to 51,000 people by the start of 2026. This has led to a massive spike in litigation, with legal proceedings involving the IND rising from 89,320 in 2024 to 110,990 in 2025. These cases include both penalty claims and appeals against rejections.

Under current law, if a decision is not reached within eighteen months, an asylum seeker can petition the court for a penalty payment. These are typically set at €15,000 per person, though they can go higher.

Rhodia Maas, director general of the IND, argues that these financial punishments do nothing to solve the underlying problem.

“Applicants have the right to timely processing by the IND. But as strange as it may sound, penalty procedures don’t help. We want to decide more quickly, but we simply can’t,” Maas stated.

She emphasized that the legal process itself drains resources from the agency, making it even more difficult to process applications in a timely manner.

“Every penalty procedure costs us not only money but also a lot of capacity. I think we could put that to much better use. Penalty payments should therefore be abolished as soon as possible,” she said.

The appeal comes as the new government cabinet — comprised of D66, CDA, and VVD — begins its term. The Reformed Political Party (SGP) has already introduced an amendment to the Asylum Emergency Measures Act aimed at ending what they say is “the circus of penalty payments.” However, the bill has not been passed yet by the Senate.

The IND also points out that cases are getting more complex, influenced by shifting geopolitical realities in countries like Syria, new political directives from The Hague, and evolving court rulings.

The upcoming implementation of the European Migration Pact in June 2026 is expected to overhaul the system further. While designed to speed up decisions on paper, the transition itself poses a challenge.

rmx

On February 4th, the French National Assembly’s legal commission adopted a constitutional bill “aimed at granting non-EU foreigners residing in France the right to vote and stand for election in municipal elections.” The bill is scheduled to be debated in plenary session on February 12th. 

Pushed by the Left, this constitutional amendment would be a tremendous encouragement for Muslim community voting at the local level. If the process is successful, it will also prove that it is always possible to amend the constitution to maximise the effects of immigration on the country—never the other way around.

The right of foreigners to vote in local elections is a long-standing demand of the Left. Since 1992, European Union nationals residing in a member state of which they are not nationals have been able to vote and stand as candidates in that state in municipal elections and in elections to the European Parliament. But the reform proposed in the initiative would this time apply to foreigners from outside the European Union. It is due to be examined by MPs on February 12th, during the Greens’ parliamentary initiative day.

Six million people would be affected by the reform, who “participate in the daily life of our cities, pay their local taxes, send their children to our schools and contribute to our economy,” according to the arguments put forward by the MPs behind the proposal. The proposal would also grant non-European foreigners the right to be eligible for the position of municipal councillor, although they would still be barred from becoming mayor.

Despite the Left’s initial ‘victory’ following the bill’s approval in committee, the battle is far from over. The assembly is deeply divided on the issue. The right-wing factions and the Rassemblement National are adamantly opposed to moving in this direction. Furthermore, this is a constitutional amendment initiated by parliamentarians, which means that it must be validated by referendum after being adopted by MPs and senators. If the reform were to pass, it would still not apply to the municipal elections scheduled for 15 and 22 March this year. But with the municipal elections approaching, the Left is pushing the symbolic issue to control the agenda.

The government, for its part, is concerned about the rise of “municipal Islam” and the proliferation of community lists. The possibility of granting foreigners the right to vote in local elections provides encouragement to these lists. According to the conservative weekly Valeurs Actuelles, only “a few dozen” towns are under the surveillance of the Interior Ministry, which keeps an eye on explicit community lists but is also wary of entryism strategies, which are more difficult to detect. In Strasbourg, for example, under the guise of multiculturalism, far-left candidate Cem Yoldas, a member of the Jeune Garde Antifasciste (Young Anti-Fascist Guard), printed his leaflets in Turkish and Arabic—a way of addressing “all the people of Strasbourg,” according to him.

On the Right, the proposed constitutional law is causing consternation. The RN has long been calling for fundamental reforms to immigration law and a referendum on migration policy. The universal response from their political opponents and the media is that these areas do not fall within the scope of a referendum. But there are ways to force a referendum, as the Green Party’s proposal proves. For Sarah Knafo, candidate for the Reconquête party in Paris and partner of Éric Zemmour, the left’s strategy is particularly harmful and signals its political failure: “When you can no longer convince voters, you create new ones,” she said on X. She also pointed to the link between control of local voting and the preservation of sovereignty: “City councillors elect senators: giving foreigners the vote gives them influence over our laws. That’s a no-no.”

europeanconservative

A bombshell report emerging from the United States Congress is sending shockwaves through the Old Continent, placing Romania—and its corrupt liberal-globalist regime— at the center of what American lawmakers now describe as a modern political coup carried out under the guise of ‘election security.’

According to findings released by the US House Judiciary Committee days ago, Romania’s 2024 presidential election, which saw frontrunner Călin Georgescu unceremoniously banned from running,was not merely mishandled—it was deliberately overturned.

The interim congressional report, published in early 2026, concludes that the Romanian electoral process was subverted through censorship, institutional pressure, and foreign interference originating not from Moscow, as the globalist politicians and their lying lackeys in the mainstream press told us, but from Brussels. The report explicitly states that on December 6, 2024, Romania experienced a de facto coup d’état when its Constitutional Court annulled the presidential election results.

At the heart of the controversy is national-conservative and sovereignist candidate Călin Georgescu, who stunned Romania’s political establishment by winning the first round of voting in November 2024. Running as an independent outsider, Georgescu campaigned on national sovereignty, cultural preservation, and opposition to globalist governance—positions that resonated deeply with voters disillusioned by the entrenched, out-of-touch political class.

Rather than allowing the democratic process to continue, Romanian authorities abruptly halted it. The justification rested on a claim by Romanian intelligence services—widely disputed and poorly substantiated—that Georgescu had benefited from a Russian-backed TikTok operation allegedly involving 25,000 coordinated accounts.

However, internal TikTok documents later submitted to both Romanian authorities and the European Commission flatly contradicted that claim. TikTok’s own threat intelligence teams repeatedly stated they found no evidence of a Russian influence campaign tied to Georgescu, nor any coordinated network of the size alleged.

Despite this, the European Commission seized on the unproven narrative to activate its Digital Services Act (DSA) “rapid response” censorship mechanisms. These systems empower EU regime-aligned ‘fact-checkers’ and NGOs—overwhelmingly left-wing and pro-globalist—to issue priority takedown requests for political content during elections.

According to the US congressional report, Romania became the most aggressive testing ground for this censorship regime. Platforms were pressured to remove national-conservative and sovereignist content, silence Georgescu’s supporters, ultimately erase his digital presence altogether, and criminalize his opposition.

Romanian electoral authorities went so far as to demand that “all materials containing images of Călin Georgescu must be removed,” a sweeping order TikTok itself flagged as politically motivated and legally questionable. The platform refused to comply fully, citing freedom of expression concerns.

Nonetheless, the damage was done. On December 6, 2024, Romania’s Constitutional Court annulled both the first round results and the scheduled runoff, which Georgescu was set to win, citing the same unsubstantiated intelligence claims. Georgescu was later formally barred from running in the rescheduled May 2025 election.

Subsequent investigations revealed a stunning twist: evidence from Romania’s own tax authority indicated that the TikTok promotion initially blamed on Russia had been funded by another Romanian political party. Yet the election results were never reinstated.

Instead, Romania’s political establishment pushed forward with a rerun election stripped of its most popular nationalist candidate. Predictably, the system’s preferred, EU-aligned candidate emerged victorious, cementing what critics now call an institutionalized theft of the presidency.

American lawmakers argue this was no isolated incident. The Judiciary Committee report documents similar EU-driven censorship efforts in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Moldova, Ireland, and Slovakia, all under the banner of combating “disinformation.”

What distinguishes Romania, however, is the scale and brazenness of the regime’s intervention. The report describes the country as the clearest example yet of how supranational institutions can override national democracy when voters choose the ‘wrong’ candidate.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly warned that globalist bureaucracies no longer tolerate genuine national-conservative and anti-globalist victories, whether in Europe or the United States. Congressional investigators now argue that Romania’s experience mirrors the broader assault on national sovereignty Trump has spent years confronting.

For Romanians seeking freedom from the grip of entrenched, anti-national elite politicians, the Georgescu affair has become a symbol of democratic betrayal. He was a candidate chosen by the people and removed not at the ballot box through censorship, authoritarian pressure, and judicial fiat.

The implications extend far beyond Romania. The American report warns that European censorship mechanisms increasingly affect American speech, American platforms, and American elections through transatlantic regulatory pressure.

As hearings continue in Washington, one conclusion becomes increasingly apparent: Romania did not lose its election to foreign hackers—it lost it to globalist governance structures unwilling to accept nationalist outcomes.

For Romanians and Europeans more broadly, the fight is no longer just about one election but about whether democracy and the nation-state can survive.

thegatewaypundit

An Iranian asylum seeker, who came to the UK illegally on the back of a lorry in July 2024, has been sentenced to 7.5 years for sexually assaulting a teenage girl.

Ahmadreza Khalafi, 29, previously pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting the teenage girl at St Albans Crown Court in December last year.

His Honour Justice Mann handed Khalafi a four-and-a-half-year custodial sentence, and a further three years on licence.

Khalafi was granted refugee status in the summer of 2024, claiming he would face persecution if he returned to Iran after converting to Christianity.

His victim, 19-year-old Abbie Johnson, who has waived her right to anonymity, told GB News she wants to ‘save someone else from going through what I went through’.

Abbie was attacked by Khalafi while she played hide and seek with her friends after a night out in Bishop Stortford in May last year.

The teenager was hiding in a bush when the 29-year-old Iranian asylum seeker “forcefully and aggressively” assaulted her.

The court was shown CCTV of the assault, which took place over 10-12 minutes.

Sentencing, His Honour Judge Mann said: “You acted on that day as a predator. You saw someone who was vulnerable and took advantage of her.

Khalafi previously admitted to four counts of sexual assault by touching at St Albans Crown Court in December last year.

Defending him, Joe Davidson, said Khalafi “remains very much a foreigner, and is not someone who’s accustomed to alcohol and western norms”.

Mr Davidson said: “Has very little formal education, very little cultural understanding of what is acceptable way to behave in England.”

Judge Mann ruled Khalafi could pose a further risk to women, and told the defendant, “I’m not entirely persuaded you don’t know the difference between right and wrong, it doesn’t matter your background, anyone would know not to go up to a helpless woman and sexually assault them. That’s not right anywhere”.

At St Albans Crown Court, Abbie bravely read her victim impact statement.

She told the court that she now feels scared in her own home, struggles to sleep and has “experienced ongoing depression and at times feels suicidal”.

She said: “I no longer recognise myself, I am disconnected to the person I was before this.”

Abbie previously told GB News the assault left her paralysed with fear, and has had a profound impact on her life.

She told Patrick Christys in December last year “it has affected every single part of my life”.

“Before this all happened, I felt like I was a normal teenage girl.

“And now I feel like I’m living with precaution, every time I leave the house, I’m wondering who’s around the corner.”

Abbie and her mother, Stacey, now want Khalafi deported.

Stacey told GB News’ Patrick Christys: “Parents need to be aware that our kids are not safe. If people do come to this country and they commit a crime, to me, that should be instant deportation.

“We’re not safe in our country now, and I feel like the people that are coming to our country have got more rights and more protection than what we have.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “This government will not allow foreign criminals and illegal migrants to exploit our laws, which is why we are reforming human rights laws and replacing the broken appeals system, allowing us to scale up deportations.

“All Foreign National Offenders who receive a prison sentence in the UK are referred for deportation at the earliest opportunity.”

Detective Sergeant Adam Haines from Hertfordshire Police said: “First and foremost, I would like to commend the victim for the courage she has shown throughout.

“Whilst I am grateful that she was spared the ordeal of having to go through a trial, preparing for it understandably left the victim feeling extremely stressed and scared.

“She continues to be deeply affected by Khalafi’s actions to this day.

“I’d also like to thank the investigation team for their hard work in bringing the case to court and securing a conviction. A sexual predator is now behind bars as a result.”

gbnews

Pressure is mounting on France’s former Socialist Party culture minister Jack Lang to resign as President of the Arab World Institute (IMA) after his name appeared in the files relating to the late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Since the disclosure of past contacts and meetings between Lang and Epstein, the former minister has defended himself, citing good faith and “naivety”.

That has been dismissed by several political figures, prompting calls from across the political spectrum for him to step down as chief of the IMA, a showcase for the Arab World in Paris.

His predecessor as head of the IMA and now President of the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region, Renaud Muselier, also called on him to step down.

“I consider Jack Lang’s position to be particularly damaging to the institution. I therefore invite him to leave, rather than be forced to resign,” he said yesterday.

According to documents released by the US Department of Justice on January 30, Lang was among the figures who corresponded with Epstein. The files include email exchanges concerning invitations to meet, including at the IMA.

Lang, who served as a minister for two terms from 1981–1986 and 1988–1993, has said he met Epstein in 2013 through a mutual friend, filmmaker Woody Allen and described Epstein as an “acquaintance”.

Lang has said he was unaware of Epstein’s prior conviction in 2008 at the time they met and said he was “stunned” when he later learned of what he described as “abominable crimes”.

He added that he did not regret having known Epstein. “I am not in the habit of badmouthing people I once knew who are later accused of crimes,” he said on French television yesterday.

French investigative outlet Mediapart reported the Lang family’s links to Epstein may have been more extensive than previously known.

According to documents reviewed by the publication, Lang’s daughter set up an offshore company registered in the Virgin Islands with Epstein.

The political fallout from the Epstein files is only beginning in France.

Several French public figures are named in the documents, including former economy minister Bruno Le Maire, mathematician-turned-MP Cédric Villani and others.

The leftt-wing party La France Insoumise has called for the creation of a cross-party parliamentary inquiry into the Epstein affair. That would be aimed at shedding light on any links that may fall “within the political sphere, foreign interference, or political party financing.”

The party says such an inquiry would also help prevent the spread of conspiracy theories.

brusselssignal

Between Laval and Château-Gontier-sur-Mayenne, the church in the French village of Quelaines-Saint-Gault is likely facing its final hours. Deemed too dilapidated, the 11th-century building was scheduled to be demolished in the coming days. The demolition has just been temporarily suspended following an appeal by the association Urgences Patrimoine.

The fight continues…

Today, the 11th-century church in the commune of Quelaines-Saint-Gault (Mayenne) is threatened with demolition by the local council, which wants to turn it into a memorial garden.

€120,000 is being invested in the demolition, but this amount could save it.

This madness must stop.

Sign the petition to save the church here:

NON À LA DESTRUCTION DES ÉGLISES DE FRANCE