Disgraced former ambassador to the US is now a police case.
For decades, Labour peer Lord Peter Mandelson was considered a master political strategist, famed for his ability to navigate not only domestic politics but also geopolitical realities to the point where they called him ‘Prince of Darkness’ for operating behind the scenes with secrecy, ruthlessness, and a talent for manipulation.
But today marks the turning point where all his shady moves will now have a bright light shone upon them.
Today, the Met Police (London) stated that searches were carried out at two separate properties linked to Mandelson in Wiltshire and central London.
“Mandelson has not been arrested and enquiries are ongoing, the Met said in a statement.
The searches are linked to a criminal investigation, announced on Tuesday, into misconduct in public office offences.”
“It is understood that Lord Mandelson was at his address in Camden when police began the search. He was then able to arrange for police to enter the Wiltshire address without force.
Detectives are likely to be looking for storage devices, phones, computers, documents and photographs during their search for evidence.”
“Police remained at Peter Mandelson’s Regent’s Park home until late on Friday evening after cops raided the Labour grandee’s properties – as they investigate him for alleged misconduct in public office.
Several cars were seen parked outside the former US ambassador’s residence on St. Katherine’s Precinct as they continued to search his home for evidence. At around 8:15pm a number of officers were seen carrying a number of cardboard boxes before going back inside the residence.
Lights were seen illuminating several rooms of the three-floor home even after the police had left. Police also searched a car parked outside one of the properties linked to Mandelson in central London.”
David Bendels in front of the Bamberg Regional Court. Screenshot youtube
On January 14, 2026, David Bendels, editor-in-chief of the German newspaper Deutschland-Kurier, was acquitted by the Bamberg Regional Court after a politically explosive prosecution that triggered international outrage.
Bendels had been targeted at the personal initiative of former German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser for publishing a satirical meme criticizing her hostility toward free speech. The earlier conviction—seven months in prison, suspended—was completely overturned. The German state will now pay all legal costs.
“Clearly Satire – Clearly Protected Speech” Following the acquittal, Bendels left no doubt about the nature of the case:
“The ‘Faeser meme’ published by Deutschland-Kurier, in its form, expression, and execution, is a clearly recognizable satire and a constitutionally protected form of pointed criticism of power and government.”
The meme—reading “I hate freedom of speech”—was a direct critique of Faeser’s censorship policies. For that, she personally signed the criminal complaint.
The case quickly became a symbol of Germany’s accelerating assault on press freedom.
A Stunning Reversal After Political Pressure The judicial about-face was dramatic. During the appeal, the same prosecutors who had previously demanded an even harsher sentence—eight months in prison—suddenly requested an acquittal. What had been treated as a criminal offense was now reclassified as permissible political criticism.
This reversal did not come from legal insight. It came from political and public pressure.
US Media Spotlight Puts Germany on Trial The case sparked outrage in the United States after being covered by the US media outlet InfoWars, where it reached a mass international audience. From there, the story spread rapidly across US alternative media.
Americans watched in disbelief as Germany prosecuted a journalist over a satirical meme.
To explain the broader context, the prominent US media outlet interviewed AfD Member of the European Parliament Petr Bystron, who outlined a pattern of abuse in Germany:
• selective law enforcement • tolerance of Antifa violence • and systematic pressure against independent journalists
Petr Bystron told US-Media: “Ordinary citizens are prosecuted for posts on Facebook or TikTok, while terrorist groups like Antifa can blow up power infrastructure and nothing happens.”
International attention proved decisive. Sustained coverage by US media and growing political pressure forced German prosecutors to retreat. Without this spotlight, the acquittal would almost certainly not have happened.
Across Germany, citizens are calling it “The Trump Effect.”
Petr Bystron: “No Time for Celebration”
Despite the acquittal, there is no reason for complacency.
Only months ago, prosecutors were still pushing for eight months in prison over a meme. The case against Bendels ended solely because of massive pressure from independent media, the AfD, and international observers. The crackdown on free speech continues.
Speaking from the courtroom, Petr Bystron warned against false optimism after the verdict:
“This acquittal is an important victory—but not the end. Press and speech freedom in Germany remain under threat.”
One journalist was spared, but the broader pattern remains. Thousands of Germans are still under investigation for online speech, police raids continue, and convictions over political expression are ongoing. This time, free speech prevailed—not because the system corrected itself, but because international scrutiny, particularly from the United States, made silence impossible.
The Next Free Speech Trial Is Already Scheduled
The next assault on freedom of expression is already on the calendar. On May 7, 2026, the appeal trial against Petr Bystron, a courageous German Member of the European Parliament, will begin. The case centers on a satirical image he shared in 2022 titled “Bye, Bye Melnyk – politicians wave goodbye,” published on the occasion of the reassignment of former Ukrainian ambassador Andrij Melnyk.
Prosecuted vs. ‘funny’: The double standard of satire in Germany
For an entire year, nothing happened—despite coverage by Germany’s largest newspaper Bild and an intense public discussion about Melnyks defence of the most famous Ukrainian nazi collaborateur Stepan Bandera.
The prosecution was launched one year later, precisely at the start of the election campaign, at a moment when Bystron was running as a top AfD candidate, ranked number two on the federal list. Only then did authorities suddenly claim the satirical image amounted to a Hitler salute.
Bystron was convicted in the first instance in what many observers regard as a politically motivated and deeply troubling ruling. He has now appealed the verdict. The central question remains: will Germany rediscover its commitment to free speech, or will the criminalization of satire and dissent continue?
Two people have been killed in an attack on a synagogue that police have confirmed was a terrorism incident. Four other people are in a serious condition in hospital. The attack took place at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue, in Crumpsall, on Yom Kippur – the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, Screengrab youtube
The attack, which occurred near a synagogue, left two Jews dead and three others severely wounded.
Dr. Faraj Al-Shamie, a senior doctor who worked alongside the International Red Cross in war zones in Africa and Afghanistan, posted on his Facebook account, stating that “Jews and Muslims lived together in harmony for generations until Hitler came and did what they deserved.”
The doctor claimed that Israel is “a country built on the skulls of Palestinians,” and compared the Palestinian Arab violence⁰ to the story of Moses’ rescue from the Nile: “Even if only one Palestinian child remains, and he is thrown into the water like Moses – he will prevail in the end.”
The post directly contradicts the apology issued by the Al-Shamie family immediately after the attack.
In that statement, the family claimed that the attack was a “profound shock” to them and that they “strongly condemn this heinous act, which targeted peaceful, innocent civilians.”
“We fully distance ourselves from this attack and express our deep shock and sorrow over what has happened. Our hearts and thoughts are with the victims and their families, and we pray for their strength and comfort. May God have mercy on the innocent victims, and we pray for the swift recovery of the injured,” the statement added.
The speaker of Poland’s Parliament who triggered a walk-out by house members when he was installed last year has been a “serious impediment” to positive relations between Poland and the United States, the American ambassador said.
The government of the United States will have no further “dealings, contacts, or communications” with Marshall of the Sjem — speaker of the Polish parliament — Włodzimierz Czarzasty, American Ambassador to Warsaw Tom Rose said on Thursday, accusing the communist lawmaker of sabotaging Warsaw-Washington relations.
Explaining the move, Ambassador Rose stated Czarzasty had made “outrageous and unprovoked insults directed against President Trump” and that he had become “a serious impediment to our excellent relations with Prime Minister Tusk and his government”.
“We will not permit anyone to harm U.S.–Polish relations”, said the ambassador.
The conservative President of Poland spoke out in support of the move through his spokesman, saying that speaker Czarzasty is “destroying Polish-American relations” and stated that his objection to Trump may stem from the United States having been “the greatest enemy for the communists” during the Cold War. He added: “Times have changed, but the mentality of the post-communist Czarzasty has not”, reports Polish publisher Interia.
Effective immediately, we will have no further dealings, contacts, or communications with Marshal of the Sejm Czarzasty, whose outrageous and unprovoked insults directed against President Trump @POTUS has made himself a serious impediment to our excellent relations with Prime…
Czarzasty is already involved in another scandal over alleged “social and business contacts” in Russia, for which Poland’s conservative Law and Justice party wants to see him investigated. Referring to this narrative, Law and Justice parliamentarian Sebastian Kaleta questioned whether the true reason the ambassador had made a public show of freezing Czarzasty out is because the Americans may have deeper knowledge of Czarzasty’s activities than what is publicly known in Poland.
The Polish centre-left naturally took a different view and a representative of Tusk’s centrist-globalist Civic Coalition party accused the Polish right of trying to overthrow the government with the assistance of “MAGA”, so to make the country into an American colony. Leftist parliamentarian Anna Maria Żukowska accused the Americans of a “diplomatic sulk” because President Trump wasn’t awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Poland’s Prime Minister, Tusk, meanwhile responded to say the United States should not “lecture” its ally.
As reported at the time of New Left Party member Czarzasty being made speaker in the Sjem in November 2025, he was greeted with a protest by conservative lawmakers who turned their backs and then walked from the chamber while chanting “down with communism”. As stated then:
…[they] alleged that the left-wing lawmaker had been a member of Poland’s communist party even in the late Cold War-era when the country was ahead of most Soviet-bloc countries in transitioning to a form of democracy.
The new speaker had previously said he respected Poland’s Communist-era dictator Wojciech Jaruzelski, and had called a Polish general who passed military secrets to NATO in the 1980s a traitor, it was alleged. Czarnek told the chamber communism isn’t actually legal in Poland and if Czarzasty is still a communist he can’t legally be speaker.
A new petition to support MP Tamara Jansen’s bill banning euthanasia for mental illness has been launched, and Canadians are urged to sign it either online, or to print a paper version and mail it in.
Bill C-218 – the “Right to Recover Act” – was debated in Parliament on December 5, with Jansen making a passionate plea for her colleagues to support Canadians with mental illness rather than offering them suicide at their most vulnerable. MP Andrew Lawton shared both his own story of surviving suicide as well as the stories of Canadians who have reached out to him since the bill was launched.
Today marks 15 years since the suicide attempt that nearly ended my life. In just 15 months, someone going through the darkness I was back then will be eligible to end their life with MAID. I shared my story in support of Bill C-218, which will stop this and literally save lives. pic.twitter.com/jN2EJ2FO6h
According to Canadian Mental Health Association, in any given year, one in five people in Canada will personally experience a mental health problem or illness;
Approximately 20 percent of Canadian youth are affected by a mental illness or disorder;
Suicide is the second leading cause of death among age 15-34;
Only one out of five children receive appropriate mental health services;
Mental illness changes a person’s thinking and impairs sober decision making;
Research has found that 46 percent of people who die by suicide had a known mental health condition;
Mental illness can be treated and recovered from, leading to a meaningful and productive life; and,
For recovery, mental health patients need a message of hope, not an option of death.
We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons in Parliament assembled to support Bill C-218 to exclude mental illness or disorder from MAiD and to invest resources to mental health services.
The petition opened for signing on February 4 and will close for signatures on March 6. The petition can be signed by following this link, and your signature will be need to be confirmed by a follow-up email that will be sent to you automatically after you fill out the petition.
Bill C-218 is one of those rare parliamentary bills that would actually save thousands of lives in the immediate term by halting the scheduled 2027 expansion of euthanasia to those suffering solely from mental illness. As the petition indicates, millions of Canadians suffer from mental illness. If those experiencing suicidal ideation are offered suicide by the state-run healthcare system, countless nightmare scenarios will play out in thousands of Canadian families across the country.
With Bill C-218, Parliament has the opportunity to prevent this nightmare.
“Dr. John Maher testified before Parliament that 7% of those who attempt suicide die by suicide,” Andrew Lawton stated in his parliamentary speech in December. “That means that 93% of people who, at one or multiple points, want to end their life eventually get over that. The success rate of MAiD is 100%. By design, this is a policy that will give up on people … These are real people. There are faces to this. If Bill C-218 does not pass, people will die. We have a right and a duty to stand up for those who need it.”
Canadians should rally to support this essential bill, both by signing the petition, and, if possible, by sharing their own stories of mental illness, suicidal ideation, and recovery with Andrew Lawton, which can be done through his website.
For several years now, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has made the presence of Christian images and symbols in public spaces one of its recurring battles. After Italy was pressured through litigation to remove crucifixes from its schools, Greece is now being targeted over the presence of holy icons in its courts. Italy ultimately won its case. Will Greece succeed in safeguarding this essential part of its historical and spiritual heritage?
Some cases have a long life. In 2009, the ECtHR issued a ruling requiring Italy to remove crucifixes from public schools. The unprecedented mobilisation of twenty-one European states alongside Italy forced it to back down, and two years later, in 2011, in the case known as Lautsi v. Italy, it finally handed down a ruling in favour of Italy’s position, allowing it to keep its crucifixes.
The Lautsi case was followed by a period of relative calm in the fight against the presence of religious symbols (Christian, needless to say) in public spaces.
In 2020, a request was filed inviting the ECtHR to take up another contentious case: the presence of Orthodox icons in Greek courts.
The offensive came from an atheist association, the Union of Atheists of Greece. The first appeals were lodged in 2018 and 2019. The applicants requested the removal of Christian symbols displayed in the courtroom during hearings on religious matters. They argued that the presence of these icons was discriminatory, compromised the objectivity of the court, and violated their right to a fair trial, as well as their right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.
The Greek courts rejected the requests to remove the icons, leading the association to take the case to the ECtHR.
Today, the ECtHR is taking up the case to propose a revision of the Lautsi case law, on the grounds that it must be “living, dynamic and evolving.”
On closer inspection, the 2011 ruling undeniably left considerable leeway for states wishing to publicly display religious symbols. The ruling first considered that the presence of a crucifix was not an act of proselytism—unlike, for example, the wearing of a veil or religious education classes. It also recognised a “margin of appreciation” for states if they wished to give “prominent visibility” to a majority religion in the country—or even, as is the case in some European states, in the case of an “official religion.”
The Greek case should fall squarely within the framework established by the Lautsi judgment, as pointed out by ADF International, which filed a brief in support of the Greek cause.
“The display of religious symbols in public spaces is in no way incompatible with international human rights law. Public spaces should not be stripped of crosses, icons or other symbols of significant religious, cultural and historical value in the name of pluralism,” said Adina Portaru, senior counsel at ADF International.
Today, Greece is an officially Orthodox Christian state and confirmed its confessional character during a constitutional revision in 2019. The revised Greek constitution states that “the dominant religion in Greece is that of the Eastern Orthodox Church of Christ.” Furthermore, it recognises “Our Lord Jesus Christ as the supreme spiritual leader.” There is no doubt that such formulations are not to the liking of the judges of the ECtHR.
As Nicolas Bauer of the European Centre for Law and Justice points out in an opinion piece published on Tuesday, February 3rd, in Le Figaro, the ECHR should not have to rule on the identity or essence of a country, but only on practices that contravene individual freedoms. He points out that the governments most often condemned by the ECtHR, including in matters of religious freedom, are those of secular states—proof that the constitutional identity of a state, even when it includes a religious and cultural dimension, is not necessarily linked to coercive practices towards its citizens.
Under these circumstances, the ECtHR has no business intervening in the Greek practice of displaying icons in courts. “Forcing Greece to remove icons from the walls of its courts would do nothing to advance individual freedoms, but would be a loss in terms of civilisation,” explains Bauer.
The Greek government is due to publish a memorandum on the subject on February 19th, 2026, prior to the ECtHR’s ruling. Bowing to the demands of militant atheists would send a disastrous signal in a global context of growing anti-Christian persecution in Europe.
The Dutch national police chief has expressed outrage after an officer received so many death threats, following the chaotic arrest of a Muslim woman, that he has been forced to go into hiding with his family for several days.
“A police officer and his family are temporarily living elsewhere due to threats. Let that sink in—a police officer who works every day to keep society safe,” Janny Knol, First Chief Commissioner of the Dutch National Police, wrote on her LinkedIn yesterday.
On January 26, footage of the officer circulated widely on social media across the Netherlands, showing how the arrest of a Muslim woman spiralled out of control during a scuffle in Utrecht.
During the arrest of the veiled woman, her friend follows the officer and the suspect and moves increasingly closer, while filming with her mobile phone. The officer then kicks her, possibly to keep her at a distance.
Subsequently, the other woman — who had been walking along laughing loudly during the arrest, reportedly possibly related to shoplifting — strikes the officer with her bag. The officer then retaliates by hitting her with his baton.
The images have sparked intense public debate in the Netherlands. Supporters of the officer argue that accusations of racism are being made unjustly, while critics accuse him of excessive force and discrimination.
As the controversy escalated, the officer’s personal details were shared online, prompting serious safety concerns.
🚨 Two Muslim women brutally assaulted by Dutch police in Utrecht.
Meanwhile, the volume and seriousness of the threats have escalated to such an extent that the officer and his family are now staying at a secret location. He is said to fear for his own safety and that of his family.
Knol said the case highlights a broader and growing problem. “Every year, more than 1,200 police officers face threats. An absurd number,” she wrote.
“These are people — people who, like anyone else, can and may make mistakes. Police work is human work. Officers sometimes have to make decisions in a fraction of a second, often under difficult circumstances, while the entire world is watching and has an opinion.”
Annabel Nanninga, a right-wing JA21 party MP, criticised police leadership for initially stating that the footage appeared intense and could be perceived as discriminatory. She said the police should have unequivocally backed the officer from the start.
“That man is arresting a woman and is being approached by someone who is also carrying something, where you can’t see what’s inside it or what’s underneath it,” she said on national television show Nieuw van de Dag (News of the Day).
“That officer also has to think about his own safety.”
The incident comes amid what many describe as a wider crisis of authority facing Dutch police, marked by declining public respect and increasing hostility.
During recent New Year’s Eve disturbances, heavy fireworks were used as weapons against officers in parts of The Hague.
Commentator Shashi Roopram said on Nieuws van de Dag the focus should shift away from scrutinising the officer’s actions.
“If you want to resolve the crisis of authority, everyone should stand behind this threatened officer and stop debating his conduct,” he said, adding that some young people “justify these kinds of threats and constantly play the racism card”.
An independent review committee is investigating the use of force during the arrest. Its findings, expected on February 9, will determine whether the officer acted within reason. The two women involved have filed formal complaints over the incident.
A Syrian migrant, convicted of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Germany before skipping probation and fleeing to the U.K., is fighting his extradition back to Germany, claiming his forced return would violate his human rights.
The case has drawn attention in both Germany and Britain after it emerged that 34-year-old Azizadeen Alsheikh Suliman, who had been living in taxpayer-funded accommodation in England, was wanted under a European arrest warrant for breaching the terms of his sentence.
The assault took place in Osnabrück in 2022, when the victim, then 15, encountered the man in the city center early in the morning. As reported by Bild, he approached her under the pretext of asking for a cigarette before attempting to kiss her and later sexually assaulting her in a nearby courtyard.
🇩🇪🇬🇧 A Syrian migrant, convicted of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Germany before skipping probation and fleeing to the UK, is fighting his extradition back to Germany, claiming his forced return would violate his human rights.
The Sun newspaper noted he groped the schoolgirl before exposing himself to her.
German courts later convicted him of sexual assault and also of supplying drugs to a minor, for which he received a two-year suspended custodial sentence, conditional on probation. He was also ordered to pay €3,000 in compensation to the victim, which to date has not been fulfilled.
Instead, Suliman fled Germany, triggering a European arrest warrant. He later travelled to Britain via a small boat in the English Channel, where he applied for asylum using a different spelling of his name, allowing him to avoid detection for several years.
He was housed in a taxpayer-funded hotel in the Greater Manchester area, where he lived with his wife and young child before eventually being identified. At the request of the German authorities, extradition proceedings were commenced.
During hearings at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, judges ruled that he should be returned to Germany. Judge Timothy King confirmed that earlier rulings ordering extradition would stand, telling the defendant that none of the arguments presented against extradition were accepted.
However, Suliman has appealed, claiming he faces death if returned to Germany due to the fact that his cousin killed multiple members of another gang in a feud originating in Syria, and that he could be targeted for revenge if he is returned. His defense also invoked Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, arguing his extradition would unjustly separate him from his wife and child.
The appeal is now being heard in the UK.
Should he be returned to Germany, it is likely that Suliman would be required to serve a substantial portion of his suspended sentence, upon completion of which his asylum status would be revoked, potentially leading to deportation proceedings back to Syria.
The LGBT movement claims that any refusal to recognize someone’s professed “gender identity” constitutes an act of “transphobic violence.” It is perversely ironic that the practical application of this claim has both bestowed victimhood status on violent criminals and created a class of actual victims – vulnerable women locked up with brutal men in female prisons.
The last decade has provided a conveyor belt of such stories: violent male criminals adopting transgender identities in order to get off with lighter sentences and to gain access to vulnerable imprisoned women. The results have been predictable: assaults, rapes, and lives of terror for the helpless women. Other violent criminals, such as Germany’s infamous “transgender Nazi” Sven Liebich, who now identifies as “Maria-Svenja,” appear to be mocking the entire farcical system.
The LGBT movement’s latest poster boy is Michael Hari, a man serving a 53-year prison sentence for a range of domestic terrorism charges that includes tossing a pipe bomb into a medical office is Champaign, Illinois, in 2017. As Reduxxreported:
Hari, along with the small group, began engaging in criminal activity in 2017 with the intention of carrying out acts of domestic terrorism. In August of that year, Hari’s group set an improvised incendiary device near the Imam’s office of the Dar-al Farooq Islamic Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. One of Hari’s associates, Micheal McWhorter, would later confirm the purpose of the attack was to “scare Muslims out of the United States.” No one was injured in the attack.
Hari called his group the “Patriot Freedom Fighters” and later the “White Rabbits.” The group, which he called his “soldiers,” also engaged in a string of other crimes, including holding up two Walmarts, mugging a Hispanic man, and planting a bomb under the railroad tracks near Effingham, Illinois, and demanding a $190,000 ransom to ward off similar attacks. The White Rabbits were arrested, and Hari got 53 years for the attempted bombing of the Islamic Center and 14 years (served concurrently) for his other crimes.
“During his trial,” Reduxxreported, “it was revealed that Hari identified as a transgender ‘woman.’ While leading the White Rabbit militia, he had been searching terms such as ‘sex change,’ ‘transgender surgery,’ and ‘post-op transgender’ on the internet. Hari allegedly planned on fleeing to Thailand to get ‘gender affirming’ surgeries. Hari formally applied for transfer to a women’s prison in October of 2023, attempting to exhaust his internal remedies.”
The “Transgender Executive Council” – which is an actual organization involved in housing decisions for gender-confused criminals – stated in a January 2024 that Hari would remain in a male prison, although he was “briefly placed in a female classification under US Marshal custody at Sherburne County Jail in Minnesota and Livingston Country Jail in Illinois before being moved back to male classification.” Hari was told that his case would be reviewed again in November. Hari did, however, successfully obtain a card dictating that he only be patted down by female officers.
Hari the terrorist predictably decided that he is a victim and sued the Bureau of Prisons on the basis that he is suffering from sex discrimination because he is a “female” being treated as a male. Last year, the case was initially dismissed on the basis of “improper venue”; Hari promptly filed a new complaint asking for “injunctive and declaratory relief,” claiming that his Fifth Amendment right to equal protection and his Eighth Amendment right against “cruel and unusual punishment” are allegedly being violated. He is asking to be placed in a women’s facility and demanding that the Bureau of Prisons facilitate a “sex change.”
“Hari is unsafe in any male prison due to her female sex characteristics,” the lawsuit states. “[Denying] [Mr.] Hari classification as a female inmate in accordance with [his] legal female sex, placing [him] at risk of sexually abusive victimization and discriminating against [his] on the basis of [his] sex.” (The bomb-thrower is no doubt an expert on safety.) Hari had initially begun “feminizing hormones” after a series of assessments in 2018 recommended “hormone therapy, electrolysis hair removal, [genital surgery], breast implants, and access to feminine undergarments and clothing,” according to Reduxx.
According to Hari’s lawsuit, Trump’s 2025 executive order banning the use of federal funds for transgender interventions – an issue Trump famously campaigned on – resulted in prison staff informing Hari that “transgender no longer exists” and “there’s only two genders now” and that his “transition” journey came to an abrupt and unjust end. In fact, even the bomber’s female underwear were seized:
In January of 2025, an announcement was posted on the FBOP electronics billboard announcing that President Trump’s Executive order 14168, titled with the Orwellian title; ‘Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government’ would be implemented by the FBOP … On March 15, 2025, at the FBOP Oklahoma City Transfer Center, Ms. Hari’s female undergarments were seized by staff in implementation of Trump’s Executive Order … and were not returned to her.
Hari, who is in a male correctional facility in Oregon, is demanding that the Bureau of Prisons reclassify him as female and resume his “sex change” interventions. Reduxxnoted that Hari’s lawsuit is similar to the case of transgender-identifying pedophile Brian Buckingham, who sexually abused his son but changed his name to “Nani Love” just before sentencing and successfully sued the Bureau of Prisons for access to “laser hair removal and other cosmetic services” on the premise that these constituted “medically necessary care.”
The truly insane aspect of these lawsuits, of course, is that if you accept the fundamental premise of the transgender movement – that a man who identifies as a woman is a woman – the domestic terrorist and the pedophile are genuine victims, and the women locked behind bars with them are not. Ideas have consequences. Hari and Buckingham are fully aware of that.
