Disgraced Former Prince Andrew Finally Evicted From Royal Lodge Mansion in the Dead of the Night, Amid More Damaging Revelations in the Epstein Files

Disturbing picture from the DOJ’s Epstein files shows Andrew crouching over a young woman laying on the floor.

Andrew has left his Windsor mansion and gone into ‘exile’ in a Sandringham farm.

The 3 million new ‘Epstein files’ documents released by the US DOJ are revealing damaging information about many powerful people around the world.

But one of the the most featured names is still former British Prince Andrew.

Virginia Giuffre, then Virginia Roberts, pictured with Prince Andrew of Britain and Ghislaine Maxwell, a confidant of now-deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Late Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre pictured with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell (US district court)

From sexual indiscretions to sharing confidential documents and floating shady deals, every day is another hard blow to his destroyed reputation.

So much so, that the man now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has brought forward his move out of the Royal Lodge mansion he has lived for decades.

The Telegraph reported:

“The former Duke of York has relocated to Wood Farm, part of the King’s Sandringham estate, while he waits for renovations to his new home, Marsh Farm, to be completed.

He had been expected to move before Easter, with his departure apparently hastened amid the release of new files relating to Epstein in recent days.”

“The Sun quoted a source as saying: ‘Leaving was so humiliating for him that he chose to do it under the cover of darkness. He had planned to cling on at Royal Lodge a little longer but, with the latest batch of Epstein files, it was made clear to him that it was time to go’.

‘He didn’t want to have a big emotional goodbye, even though Royal Lodge is a place where he had so many family memories. Theoretically, he could have stayed until Marsh Farm was ready – but the headlines were only getting worse. Also, the fact he’s been seen driving around Windsor laughing and looking like he hasn’t a care in the world hasn’t gone down well with the royal household’.”

And that’s not all: UK Police are ‘assessing’ allegations that a second woman (besides Virginia Giuffre) was sent to the UK by Epstein for a sexual encounter with Andrew.

Daily Mail reported:

“The woman, who was in her 20s and is not British, claims she spent a night with the former Prince at his Royal Lodge home in 2010 on Epstein’s request.

[…] The allegation, which was made last week, marks the first time an Epstein survivor claims they were sexually abused at a royal residence.”

The late Virginia Giuffre alleged she had sex with Andrew in the UK when she was 17 years old. Andrew settled her lawsuit for a reported £12 million.

thegatewaypundit

“ENOUGH!” Starmer Lacks ALL Judgment & MUST Resign Over Mandelson & Epstein Scandal

NCF Senior Fellow Rafe Heydel-Mankoo argues that Keir Starmer’s position as Prime Minister is untenable following revelations he knew that Peter Mandelson continued seeing Epstein yet still made him US Ambassador. This is the latest in a pattern of incompetence.

Starmer KNEW Mandelson CONTINUED Epstein Relationship Yet Still Made him US Ambassador. He Must Go!
“Enough is Enough!” Starmer Lacks ALL Judgment and MUST Resign Over Mandelson & Epstein Scandal
Starmer Admits He KNEW Mandelson CONTINUED Seeing Epstein. PM Has NO Political Judgment & Must Go.

Pathways: How the UK Home Office Accidentally Created a Right-Wing Icon

Amelia
@AmeliajakSolana on X, last edited on February 1, 2026

The UK Home Office’s Pathways training package was intended to counter the threat of radicalisation in the United Kingdom. Needless to say, this wouldn’t be the most ferocious form of radicalisation, which is Islamism, and by a huge margin. No, they decided to spend a great deal of time and taxpayers’ money on a programme highlighting that spectral terror which lurks only in the minds of civil servants and Church of England clergy—the dreaded ‘far right.’ 

Marketed as an interactive educational tool for schools, Pathways adopts the language and aesthetics of a video game to guide young people away from ‘dangerous pathways.’ In practice, of course, it’s only the one pathway they’re worried about. It reveals a great deal about how the modern British state now defines extremism and why that definition is detached from reality. Pathways has become a case study in institutional overreach, ideological confusion, and the persistent failure of Britain’s counter-extremism establishment to understand either public opinion or the threat landscape we ask them to manage on our behalf. 

At the centre of Pathways is a character called Amelia; a purple-haired goth girl wearing a choker and a pink dress. Unless you have completely detached yourself from the internet over recent weeks, you will have almost certainly come across her, and you will have probably seen her indulging in such extremist practices as waving a Union Jack and generally loving her country. 

Amelia is a teenage activist who questions mass immigration, protests against demographic transformation and expresses alarm at the direction of modern Britain. Within the game’s internal logic, engaging with Amelia’s views increases a ‘risk’ score, pushing the player closer to state intervention and the government’s Prevent process. The message is not subtle. Concerns regarding mass immigration and unwanted cultural change are treated not as political positions to be debated, but as symptoms to be managed. The line between radicalisation and dissent is not merely blurred—it is erased.

This framing exposes the true function of Pathways. It is less an anti-terrorism tool than a mechanism of ideological conditioning, one that treats mainstream concerns about borders, identity, and social cohesion as inherently suspect. In doing so, it confirms what many critics of Prevent have long argued: that counter-extremism policy has quietly expanded into the regulation of thought.

Unbelievably, the Home Office appears to have been caught entirely off guard by the reaction to Amelia. Rather than being rejected, she has been embraced, memed, remixed, and elevated into a symbol across online right-wing communities in Britain and across Europe. Far from functioning as a warning sign, she has become an anti-hero: a shorthand for the ordinary citizen whose views place her on the wrong side of official ideology.

This outcome was entirely predictable. When the state caricatures legitimate political positions, it does not delegitimise them; it validates them. Amelia’s popularity is not evidence of mass radicalisation. It is evidence of widespread exasperation with a political class that insists on vilifying dissent rather than engaging with it. Once released into the digital ecosystem, Amelia escaped Whitehall’s control. She now circulates across European right-wing spaces as a familiar figure—not because of British politics alone, but because her story resonates across the continent. Every country, it seems, now produces its own Amelias—citizens who notice social change, articulate concerns, and are told that doing so places them on a dangerous path.

The most serious flaw in Pathways is not its tone, but its priorities. Britain’s security services have been clear for years: Islamist extremism remains the most serious and ideological threat to the country. The overwhelming majority of attacks, disrupted plots, and terrorism-related deaths in the United Kingdom are linked to Islamist ideology. This is not a matter of opinion; it is a matter of record. And it is the same across Europe.

Yet, Pathways reflects a broader institutional drift away from this reality. Increasingly, counter-extremism resources are directed towards policing right-wing opinion, often defined so broadly that it includes views held by a sizeable portion of the electorate, while the most dangerous forms of extremism are treated with comparative caution—if, indeed, they are treated at all. The result is a grotesque imbalance. The state devotes ever more energy to monitoring attitudes while kowtowing to ideologies which have demonstrated a repeated willingness to translate belief into violence. This imbalance does not enhance public safety; it most assuredly undermines it.

Pathways also reopens uncomfortable questions about the Prevent Strategy itself. Originally introduced as a safeguarding mechanism aimed at preventing radicalisation turning into violence, Prevent has steadily expanded into a bloated, ill-organised surveillance framework. Teachers, youth workers, and public servants are encouraged to interpret political views as early warning signs, with teenage boys even being reported for crowding around a screen and looking at Andrew Tate-related content. This muddles any distinction between safeguarding and ideological enforcement. 

This expansion has consequences. It erodes trust in public institutions, discourages open discussion and teaches young people that certain viewpoints (however widely held) are best kept hidden. Far from building resilience, it fosters yet further cynicism and resentment. Amelia’s transformation into a cultural icon should be understood in this context. She is not celebrated because she is thought of as extreme, but because she represents resistance: resistance to being infantilised by a state that no longer distinguishes between disagreement and danger and which holds most of us in utter contempt.

Ultimately, Pathways has backfired because it embodies a worldview that cannot or will not differentiate between terrorism and democratic dissent. By collapsing these distinctions, the UK Home Office has handed its critics a powerful symbol of its own making. The irony is spectacular. In attempting to warn young people away from so-called dangerous narratives, the British government has demonstrated precisely why those narratives flourish; because institutions refuse to engage honestly with public concern, preferring instead to moralise, stigmatise, surveil and, often, arrest. Counter-extremism policy cannot succeed if a nation’s government treats its ordinary citizens as latent threats, or if it prioritises ideological conformity over physical security. Britain does not need gamified moral lessons. It needs honesty about where real danger lies and the confidence to defend free political disagreement. 

Until things change, Amelia will continue to grow and circulate across our continent. 

europeanconservative

UK’s Starmer Admits He Knew of Relationship Between Epstein and Ex-Ambassador Mandelson

Lord Peter Mandelson, half-naked in the DOJ-released Files, is experiencing the ‘Epstein curse’ in a big way – and it can get worse.

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has admitted that he was aware that his mentor and former Ambassador to the United States, Lord Mandelson, had a relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, but claimed that he was misled over the extent of the ties.

Taking to the dispatch box on Wednesday afternoon as he fights for his political life, Prime Minister Starmer attempted to shift blame for the disastrous decision to appoint veteran former Tony Blair spin doctor Lord Peter ‘Prince of Darkness’ Mandelson as his ambassador to Washington.

Starmer admitted that he was aware that Mandelson had continued his relationship with deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein after serving prison time for child sex offences. This followed opposition Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, who noted during PMQs that a Financial Times journalist had informed Starmer in 2024 that Mandelson had stayed at Epstein’s house after the conviction.

While the PM acknowledged he knew about the links, he claimed he was unaware of the “sheer depth and extent of the relationship” between the two men, The Times reported.

“He lied about that to everyone for years. New information was published in September showing the relationship was materially different to what we’d been led to believe. When the new information came to light, I sacked him,” Starmer said.

“If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been appointed [as ambassador to Washington],” the prime minister added.

Renewed scrutiny has been placed on the decision to appoint Mandelson in the wake of the U.S. Department of Justice releasing millions of documents related to the Epstein case, including emails between the paedophile money man and the British political operative.

According to the files, Mandelson allegedly used his former position as business secretary under the Gordon Brown Labour government in 2009 to provide Epstein with confidential, potentially market-moving insider information, including advance notice of an impending €500 billion bailout.

The tranche of documents also appeared to show Mandelson receiving $75,000 (£55,000) in direct payments from Epstein, who also seemingly paid Mandelson’s husband £10,000 in 2009.

London’s Metropolitan Police said on Tuesday evening that it has opened a criminal investigation into Lord Mandelson over potential misconduct while in office. This came shortly after Mandelson resigned from his House of Lords seat.

While the longtime Labour Party spin doctor, who served prominently in all Labour governments this century, has resigned from the party, it is unlikely to do much to quell the budding scandal.

During the heated exchange in the House of Commons on Wednesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch questioned whether the prime minister still has confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, who is said to have been a driving force behind the decision to appoint Mandelson as U.S. ambassador.

“We know there will be a cover-up because this implicates the prime minister and Morgan McSweeney,” Badenoch said.

Although the PM said that McSweeney remains an “essential part” of his team, time will tell if the Downing Street power broker may be thrown to the wolves in order to save Starmer’s skin. The scale of discontent over the matter even among Starmer’s own Labour Party is becoming clear as his attempt to limit what Mandelson documents would be released for parliamentary scrutiny were subject to a u-turn on Wednesday afternoon in the face of a backbench rebellion.

Indeed, even before the Epstein scandal, Starmer was said to be on the ropes, with his approval ratings plummeting since taking power last year and multiple rumoured leadership challenges splashed across the London press. Previously, the upcoming May elections were seen as being make-or-break for his premiership; however, it remains to be seen if the embattled Labour leader will manage to cling to power until then.

breitbart

Following Spain’s mass amnesty, a large assault on Ceuta’s ‘crumbling’ border fence is imminent

Migrants storm border fence into Spain’s Ceuta enclave. Screengrab youtube

Spain’s Civil Guard officers’ association has warned that the border fence surrounding the Spanish autonomous city of Ceuta is in a state of serious deterioration, with several sections in disrepair, allowing migrants to cross the barrier in less than 30 seconds.

In a statement cited by Europa Sur, the Unified Association of the Civil Guard (AUGC) said recent storms in the Strait of Gibraltar, including Storm Kristin, caused parts of the double fence separating Ceuta from Morocco to collapse or loosen, leaving what it described as a border in a state of “collapse.”

Repair of the infrastructure has not been made a priority, and the damage has coincided with the mass amnesty offered by Spain’s socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, to illegal immigrants, which experts warned has created a mass pull factor that is placing even more pressure on authorities protecting Spanish territory.

The association renewed calls for a comprehensive overhaul of the entire border perimeter, arguing that authorities have relied too heavily on temporary repairs and improvised fixes instead of implementing a long-term solution.

From an operational perspective, the AUGC warned that the current configuration of the double fence is “clearly vulnerable,” noting that migrants can scale both fences in under 30 seconds, leaving security forces little time to react effectively.

Security features installed to slow crossings are also proving ineffective, according to officers. Anti-climb netting can be bypassed with improvised tools, while hooks and other devices are reportedly used at the top of the 10-meter-high barrier to speed up ascents.

Officers further warned that the metal support beams on the inner side of the structure now function as “real ladders,” making descent easier once migrants cross.

Another concern raised is the condition of the fence’s detection systems. According to the AUGC, the accumulation of temporary repairs and structural patches prevents the fencing from vibrating properly, reducing the effectiveness of sensors designed to detect climbing attempts and sometimes causing delayed or failed alerts.

Attention has also turned to Ceuta’s maritime border. The association is calling for urgent expansion and renovation of the Benzú and El Tarajal breakwaters to prevent migrants from attempting to swim around land barriers. Officers described the Benzú breakwater in particular as “falling apart,” warning that its condition poses risks both to migrants and to security personnel.

The warning follows an incident on February 1, when dozens of illegal migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, including nationals from Guinea and Sudan, entered Ceuta irregularly after scaling the damaged fencing. Authorities said the group took advantage of bad weather and structural weaknesses to evade detection systems.

Spanish migration analyst Rubén Pulido warned on the La Noche de Cuesta radio program that further attempts to breach the fence could be imminent.

“Dozens of migrants have damaged the border fences in Ceuta. A mass assault is expected within the next 48-72 hours. The situation at our borders is currently extremely tense. Officers are under-resourced, and the worst is feared in the area,” he said.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s government recently agreed with far-left allies to implement a large-scale regularization of migrants already in the country through a royal decree.

Under the measure, migrants able to prove their presence in Spain before Dec. 31, 2025, and at least five months’ continuous stay may qualify for provisional residence and work permits if they have no serious criminal record. Deportation proceedings are suspended once an application is filed, and successful applicants receive a one-year renewable residence permit. Podemos estimates that more than half a million people could benefit.

Critics argue the move risks encouraging further irregular migration by signaling leniency toward illegal entry.

Vox party leader Santiago Abascal sharply criticized the policy, saying, “The tyrant Sánchez hates the Spanish people. He wants to replace them. That’s why he intends to create a pull factor by decree, to accelerate the invasion. It must be stopped. Repatriations, deportations, and immigration.”

rmx

Germany’s flag now considered an ‘extreme right-wing statement’ in Germany

Screenshot/Facebook

by Olivia Murray 

In the city of Arnsberg, Germany, on some steps at a local bus station, students of a nearby school had painted a “Pride” flag down the risers of the stairs, as part of a “diversity and tolerance project.” But then, as reported by Thomas Brooke at Remix News, someone changed it up—a dreaded and evil nationalist no doubt—effectively painting a German flag over the students’ “art” installation (photo above):

When the leftists saw what had been done, outrage erupted:

Local Green Party council leader Verena Verspohl condemned the action, calling it a political statement directed against minorities. In a social media video, she said: ‘Spraying a rainbow staircase in black, red, and gold is not a political statement. That is an extreme right-wing statement. It can’t be misinterpreted. This means that it is against diversity, against queer people, against peace, freedom, and a colorful society, and in favor of nationalism.’

Painting your country’s flag in a public space is somehow not a completely reasonable political statement, but an “extreme” act of “right-wing” aggression against certain portions of the population? In a sane world, we’d call that insanity. And, if the motive of the patriotic painter(s) really were a statement against “queer” individuals, AKA queer leftists? To that I say, good. This morning, an AT reader sent us a story about how ten men in France had been arrested and charged with raping a 5-year-old boy they’d procured from the boy’s father; this child was the “entertainment” for their “chemsex” party, which is, apparently, where a bunch of gays get together, do drugs, and engage in obscene sexual behavior, either with each other, or in this case, a drugged child. So forgive me for not giving a flying rat’s rear about statements against “queer people” who are part of the gay crusade. (Let’s not forget who commits more than half of the sex crimes against children, while comprising just a fraction of the overall adult population.)

Verspohl also added that while she didn’t have a problem with the German banner being flown in private spaces, it “doesn’t work at all” in public spaces:

‘Paint yourselves in national colors at home, hang the flag in your garden, do what you want. But this is the public space. That doesn’t work at all. Incidentally, it’s a pupil’s work, a pupil’s star work, which is being trampled on here.’

Read that again: The German flag is an unwelcome sight in Germany’s public square. And it wasn’t just Green Party officials who had a problem with the banners of black, red, and gold, but other “city officials” as well, who filed a complaint with local law enforcement. In an an ironic twist, the complaints about the flag being a “statement” against peace and freedom are beyond asinine, as the colors literally represent a journey from servitude to liberty and prosperity: the black represents the darkness of oppression, thrown off through a bloody struggle (red), emerging into the golden age of democracy, unity, freedom, and peace. The “Pride” flag is inarguably, only representative of a small bit of the overall population, while the German flag represents every German.

Again, why do these idiots even have a say in the political process? Voting is a privilege (not a right!), and their privileges need to be revoked.

americanthinker

‘EC interfered in elections across Europe and censors content,’ US Republicans say

Former Internal Market European Commission Commissioner, Thierry Breton, an EU censor who threatened X if they carried an interview with Donald Trump. Wikimedia Commons, Bogdan Hoyaux / European Union, CC-BY-4.0

The US House Committee on the Judiciary has ramped up its accusations against the European Commission, accusing it of repeated election interference and censorship.

After reviewing documents and communications of European regulators regarding Brussels’ tech regulation, the Republican-led Committee published a report titled The EU Censorship Files, Part II.

It is accompanied by thousands of pages of internal Big Tech documents and communications with European regulators.

The committee, chaired by Republican Jim Jordan, describes the material as proof of a decade-long European campaign to impose global narrative control through pressure on social-media platforms.

The findings build directly on January’s exposure by the same committee of the EC’s first-ever fine under the Digital Services Act (DSA) – €120 million against X for “defending free speech”.

That decision, which the Republicans had made public, was described as a “secret censorship order”.

The new committee material extends the critique, saying the EC has gone far beyond content moderation to reshape the rules that govern what may or may not be said online worldwide.

According to the documents, the pressure began as early as 2015 with ostensibly “voluntary” regulations. These included the EU Internet Forum, the Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, the Code of Practice on Disinformation.

In private, platform executives admitted they had “no real choice” but to comply.

The EC repeatedly demanded changes to global community guidelines, the policies that set the boundaries of acceptable speech for users everywhere, including in the US.

The House Representatives points towards pressure during the Covid-19 pandemic to remove or down-rank truthful content questioning vaccine efficacy in children or established narratives on lockdowns and virus origins.

There were also meetings in California in which EC Vice-President Věra Jourová made clear that US as well as European elections were on the agenda.

Former European Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton is also mentioned, in particular his highly controversial letter threatening X  in August 2024 with regulatory retaliation for hosting a live interview with now-US President Donald Trump.

Finally, and perhaps most explosive, the Republicans say there were at least eight sets of pre-election meetings with platforms ahead of elections in six European countries since 2023, with demands to suppress “disinformation” in the final days before polling.

Particularly striking, they say, is the  case of Romania.

After the first round of the 2024 presidential elections, a court annulled the result on the basis of alleged but still unproven Russian interference via TikTok favouring candidate Călin Georgescu.

Internal platform records released by the committee show that TikTok informed the EC it had found “no evidence” of any such co-ordinated foreign campaign.

Subsequent public reporting indicated the supposed influence operation was in fact funded by a rival Romanian political party. The election was nevertheless rerun and the establishment candidate prevailed.

The report also documents how platforms altered their worldwide rules to satisfy DSA requirements.

TikTok, for instance, updated its global community guidelines in 2024 explicitly “to comply with the Digital Services Act”. It introduced new restrictions on “marginalising speech” and other categories that the committee argues adversely affect constitutionally protected speech in the US.

The committee said censorship was applied via “codes” and “forums” that were, initially, not legally binding but still felt imposed, as internal mails of tech companies showed “they don’t really have a choice” on whether to comply or not.

In 2015, the EU created the EU Internet Forum (EUIF), via the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs. By 2023, the EUIF had published a handbook for tech companies to moderate “lawful, non-violative speech”, also named “borderline content”.

With support of NGO’s and “trusted researchers”, these are supposed to moderate so-called populist rhetoric, anti-government or anti-EU content, anti-elite content, political satire, anti-migrant and Islamophobic content, anti-refugee or anti-immigration sentiment, anti-LGBTIQ+ content, anti-feminism, pro-Kremlin borderline content and meme culture.

Political satire is also part of this “borderline content” because, according to the EC, it is susceptible to “terrorist and violent extremist content” when it creates a “sense of collective identity and internal group cohesion” and is used to “avoid censorship [sic] based on delivery as a joke”.

Republican Senator Eric Schmitt declared: “Far-left Eurocrats want social media companies to censor Americans’ online speech through regulatory decree. We rejected European control of our speech in 1776.

“We’re not going to allow it in 2026.”

Committee chairman and fellow Republican Jim Jordan summarised the EC’s record as having “pressured social media platforms to censor true information in the United States, targeted US political content, and interfered in elections across Europe”.

The timing of the report’s release coincides with fresh action in France. Yesterday, the Paris prosecutor’s cybercrime unit, supported by Europol, raided X’s French offices and summoned the platform’s owner Elon Musk and former chief executive Linda Yaccarino for questioning in April.

The investigation, opened in January 2025 and recently widened, now encompasses alleged algorithmic bias, foreign interference, dissemination of child sexual abuse material, Holocaust denial and the functioning of X’s Grok AI.

Critics described the communiqué announcing the French moves as resembling the language of a “communist junta”. It was also pointed out that opposite the algorithms, there stood a legacy media that was even less nuanced than the new tech, with all traditional magazines fully embracing and supporting President Emmanuel Macron in his first bid for the post.

The House Judiciary Committee has scheduled a hearing for later today at which victims of the alleged European censorship campaign are due to testify. The committee says its investigation into foreign threats to US free speech continues.

brusselssignal

Europe’s left wants to replace the white working class with migrants

Granting citizenship to hordes of illegal immigrants coming from Africa and the Middle East is a threat to the whole of Europe, but it makes the left happy

by Giulio Meotti

We live in strange and interesting times, in which leaders of the left hope that migrants (who, of course, will not be Cuban, Ukrainian, or Venezuelan) replace, literally, white people.

The Spanish MEP and leader of Podemos, Irene Montero, celebrated the dramatic regularization of illegal immigrants wanted by Pedro Sánchez’s government as a “victory”. The measure will benefit at least half a million illegal immigrants. An enormous figure for a very old population of 49 million Spaniards, who in fact do not approve of the demographic invasion.

Granting citizenship to hordes of illegal immigrants coming from Africa and the Middle East is a threat to the whole of Europe as well.

Niall Ferguson will recall that the main reason for Brexit was immigration: “Many people in the United Kingdom looked at the refugee crisis in Europe and thought: ‘If these people get German passports, they will come to Great Britain and we will not be able to stop them.’ This was a fundamental issue for voters, and legitimately so, because the Germans had opened the doors to a vast influx from the Muslim world. If you looked at these things from the United Kingdom the reaction was: wait a moment, what happens if they arrive here?”

German journalist Jochen Bittner, writing in The New York Times, also explained that Brexit gained momentum with Angela Merkel’s decision: “At the end of 2015, the Leave campaign began posting billboards showing the exodus of Syrian refugees and others from Balkan countries, using slogans like ‘Breaking Point’ and ‘Take Back Control.’ With Merkel favoring an open-door policy, the message struck millions of concerned Britons and Europeans. It was during this period that support for Brexit began to strengthen.”

With these insane immigration policies they will end up destroying the European Union.

Montero went so far as to call for the replacement of Spaniards with immigrants: “I hope that we can sweep this country clean of fascists and racists with migrants,” she exclaimed, defending the “replacement theory.”

Montero was speaking at a Podemos rally (a party sympathetic to Hamas, Maduro, and Iran) in Zaragoza as part of the campaign for the Aragon regional elections on February 8, and she asked “please, migrant and racialized people,” do not “leave us alone with so many fascists.”

“We have obtained the documents, regularization now. And now we are trying to obtain citizenship or to change the law so that they can vote, obviously. We hope, with the theory of replacement, to be able to sweep this country clean of fascists and racists with migrants, with workers. Of course, I want there to be a replacement – a replacement of fascists, a replacement of racists – and that we can do it with the workers of this country, whatever the color of their skin, whether they are Chinese, Black, mixed-race, with all the workers of this country.”

Despite having one of the lowest birth rates in the world, Spain has just reached a population of 49,442,844 inhabitants, a historical record, thanks to the increase in immigration. According to the National Institute of Statistics (INE), this demographic growth is due to the increase in individuals born abroad currently residing in Spain, in contrast with the decrease in the number of inhabitants born in the country.

ABC writes: “The foreign population will grow 20 times faster than the Spanish population.”

In 1990, Muslims in Spain numbered 100,000. In 2010, the number reached 1.5 million. In 2017, two million. In 2025, two and a half million. This is a growth of 1,900 percent in just 27 years. And in the future? 11 million within another generation.

Spain must accept 191,000 immigrants every year from now until 2050 if it wants to compensate for the ongoing population collapse, according to the document Spain 2050 presented by Prime Minister Sánchez, who has begun the work with the first 500,000 naturalized illegal immigrants. “We will have to welcome and integrate hundreds of thousands of immigrants from now until 2050,” the report states, also considering the reception of a larger volume. “If we accept 255,000 people per year, the decline of the working-age population would be 1.8 million people, instead of the 3.7 million expected with a migratory balance of 191,000.”

According to estimates by the think tank Funcas, cited by La Gaceta, the number of irregular immigrants increased from about 107,000 in 2017 to nearly 840,000 in 2025, an increase of almost 685 percent.

Impressive are the words of Rafael Bardaji, former national security adviser to Spanish Prime Minister José María Aznar:

“In 1996, Spain had 542,314 registered foreigners. Most came from Northern European countries and the United Kingdom – retirees with dual residence who came to enjoy long stays or retirement in the benefits of the Spanish climate. In 2004, when the Socialist Party returned to power, the foreign population had multiplied sixfold, reaching 3 million. From 2004 onward, with very few exceptions linked to the deep economic crisis generated by the Socialist government of Rodríguez Zapatero, immigration continued to grow. The last census of 2022 places it at over 5.5 million (12 percent of the total population), and estimates for 2024 range from 6.5 million to 7.5 million, 15 percent of the population.

“The infamous Arab and Muslim route has shifted from the Middle East to the West with the acquiescence of timid conservatives and the complacency of an infantile and nihilistic left. Today, Barcelona looks more like Tangier than Copenhagen or Milan. In Spain, Spanish women have a fertility rate of 1.1 children, Moroccan women have 3.4. Not far from now, there will be more worshippers in mosques on Fridays than Catholics at Mass on Sundays.”

A few days ago Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of La France Insoumise and head of the French left, invited his party to demonstrate “its ability to embody the new France, the France of the Great Replacement, the France of the generation that replaces another because it has always been so since the dawn of time.” He also stated: “We do not speak enough Arabic in France.”

Le Figaro just reported: “Six out of ten new French citizens are of African origin.”

In the Paris region, the ten most given male baby names are, in order: Mohamed, Adam, Ibrahim, Isaac, Imran, Ismaël, Amir, Issa, Yanis, and Rayan. For girls: Nour, Lina, Aya, Inaya, Fatoumata, Sofia, Aïcha, Alya, Sarah, and Yasmine.

Muslim women in France have a fertility rate of 2.73 children, double that of native French women, according to a study published in Causeur.

And yet the “grand remplacement” was a fascist fantasy. What do Americans think when reading these numbers?

Philosopher Peter Boghossian explains it to Le Figaro:

“Before coming to France, I was at a dinner and when I said I would be coming here, several people replied: ‘Why are you doing it? It doesn’t matter. Don’t go. France is lost.’ I think many Americans, from the center to the right, do not believe that France will still exist at the end of the century. If a society does not want to fight for what it considers important, then it deserves what happens to it. We can do a few thought experiments. Imagine that all the inhabitants of Uganda settle in Belgium: will Belgium be the same in fifty years? No. Okay. Now imagine that all the Swedes, except those from Malmö, move to Uganda and Ugandans become a minority. What will it be like in fifty years?

“These are legitimate questions. More than 1 percent of the French population is made up of illegal immigrants. This represents 700,000 people. You have no idea who these people are. It is completely insane. It is a cultural suicide. University professor Gad Saad calls it ‘suicidal empathy.’ The denial is immense. That is why many Americans think you are finished.”

Merry Hermanus, an official of the Socialist Party in Brussels, revealed: “What would the Socialist Party be without the mosques? Less than 10 percent. The Socialist Party obtained 23 percent in the last elections. Without North Africans it is worth 8.”

What the Socialists have done in Brussels they want to replicate everywhere, from Spain to France to Italy, with the unconditional surrender of the Democratic Party to the demographically profitable crescent.

At the municipal council of Molenbeek, one of the municipalities of the Brussels region, the interim mayor and socialist councilor Saliha Raïss said: “Do women with veils bother you? Then leave!”.

When the French writer Renaud Camus, who coined the expression “Great Replacement,” was supposed to walk through the streets of the Brussels municipality of Saint-Josse, the mayor Emir Kir, a socialist of Turkish origin who denies the Armenian genocide, issued an ordinance banning the demonstration:

“Saint-Josse symbolizes the Great Enrichment, not the Great Replacement.”

Let us look at the data, which date back several years. Saint-Josse is already 49 percent Islamic. Replacement accomplished.

They have turned the fears of the “Great Replacement” into victory reports.

For years, the left said that the expression “Great Replacement” was a right-wing conspiracy theory and now shifts the debate to the taboo of “remigration.”

For me, who does not believe in conspiracies, the definition given by Michel Houellebecq therefore applied: “I was very shocked that it was called a ‘theory.’ It is not a theory, it is a fact.”

The left is now converted to a ruthless operation of social and political engineering disguised as humanitarianism and to an imperative of self-replacement addressed to native populations, while they-the cosmopolitan elites-preserve their privileges and enclaves.

Their slogan is: “Replace yourselves”. Second person plural.

israelnationalnews

Historic First UK Muslim Mayor Helped Hide Son’s Rape of 15-Year-Old Girl

After being elected mayor, Naheed Ejaz read a passage from the Koran.

The Pakistani Muslim sex grooming gangs, we keep being told, are a fringe phenomenon and the rape of underage is in no way emblematic of the fine historic Pakistani Muslim UK mayors accused of helping allegedly hide their son’s rape of 15-year-old girls.

It was a night of firsts at Bracknell Forest Council on Wednesday (May 24) as it met following earthquake local elections earlier this month.

Councillors elected their first ever Asian woman mayor, their first woman leader and their first woman deputy leader in its 50-year existence. And it is the first Labour-run administration at the council since 1997.

Labour mayor Naheed Ejaz told the authority’s annual meeting women were “smashing the glass ceilings” and making history.

After being elected mayor, Naheed Ejaz, Labour councillor for Great Hollands ward, read a passage from the first chapter of the Quran, which she said was called “the opener – the key.”

“That’s what we are doing today,” she added. “We are opening a new chapter in Bracknell Forest Council’s history.

She opened a new Koran chapter, but she wouldn’t open the door for the police.

A former Labour mayor helped her son hide evidence of his alleged rape of a 15-year-old girl, a court has heard.

Naheed Ejaz, the former mayor of Bracknell in Berkshire, allegedly delayed police officers when they came to arrest 41-year-old Diwan Khan in September 2024.

Winchester Crown Court heard that she stopped officers entering her home for “some minutes” and spoke to her son in Urdu to “assist” him in concealing a phone, which contained a video of the alleged sex attack.

Khan is accused of giving the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, MDMA and vodka in June 2024 before raping her when she “blacked out”.

Prosecutors said that when she awoke in the back seat of his car without any clothes on, Khan showed her a video of him having sex with her, choking her and slapping her face.

Does that chapter of the Koran have any tips on hiding evidence or just Mohammed’s usual way of raping underage girls?

frontpagemag

Epstein files expose links to transgender ideology’s wealthiest backers

Mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein Wikimedia Commons, Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Department. PD Florida

During an episode of his show on Tuesday, Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire drew attention to a number of emails between the serial sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein and prominent LGBT activists, which were released over the weekend in the U.S. Department of Justice’s document dump. All of the communications occurred after Epstein was convicted of “procuring a child for prostitution” and registered as a sex offender in 2008.

One email, from billionaire Tom Pritzker, was sent to Epstein in June 2011, jovially noting that he was in Afghanistan, ostensibly looking at investment opportunities, but, in reality, fulfilling “my birthday wish, with boys with toys” after being lent two choppers by General David Petraeus. Pritzker, Walsh noted, is one of the wealthy men pushing transgender ideology. As investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek told me in a 2024 interview on the billionaires behind the transgender industry:

The Pritzker family in Chicago is one of the richest families in America. Though their fortune evolved out of the Hyatt Hotel industry, their predominant investments now are in the medical-tech sector. Their massive philanthropic efforts have made them some of the biggest drivers/funders of the gender industry. Tim Gill of the Gill Foundation – the second largest LGBT NGO in America and connected to Jon Stryker and his family – contributes significantly as well, originally coming from the tech sector and now involved in a home AI platform business. The tech giants – Google, Intel, Microsoft, Facebook, Salesforce, Hewlett Packard, and Amazon – leverage their financial power both to fund this industry in body dissociation and also to browbeat entire states to accept the ideology by threatening the withdrawal of their capital. They did this in 2016, when they signed an amicus brief against North Carolina. After that the state insisted on bathroom privacy for boys and girls in schools.

Another email, this one from December 17, 2018, is from Robert Trivers, the famed American evolutionary biologist. In a truly chilling exchange, Trivers lays out the pseudo-scientific rationale behind the transgender experiment.

It is very simple – I will compare male to female with female to male. With greater molecular control over development we are increasingly capable of producing novel phenotypes – more feminine men, by blocking testosterone receptors (or castration) and, at the same time, increasing estrogen production – the one bocks male features, the second encourages female features. More masculine women – heavy testosterone dosage – incredible external effects, heavily bearded men, you would never guess they had a female bone in their body.

Trivers goes on to note, in terms too pornographic to reproduce here, the sexual difficulties and sexual fantasies associated with each kind of “transgender” person – male-to-female, female-to-male – and the way treatments permanently transform their bodies.

Trivers observes that males who undergo sex change surgeries post-puberty are frequently miserable and suggests that a solution is to medically intervene earlier. “(S)o you notice your 3-year-old son has trans tendencies, so now you intervene with hormones – I would be frightened to do that – but who knows?” Trivers writes.

The email details the thinking of the pioneers of transgender ideology as it developed – Trivers might have been “frightened” to give a 3-year-old cross-sex hormones or puberty blockers after the toddler displays “trans tendencies,” but the transgender movement swiftly got over such fears. “Transition” for children is now advocated as a human right by the LGBT movement and their political allies.

Another email, this one from Jess Ting on May 14, 2016. Ting is, as Walsh noted, “the trans surgeon who supposedly pioneered a new way to carve out fake female genitals in men.”

In the email, Ting pitches Epstein on support for a propaganda documentary pushing the transgender industry:

Hi Jeffrey,

I hope you are well. I have 2 things to tell you about:

1) The research you supported with a $50,000 grant has borne fruit. We have submitted a paper for publication summarizing our results. If you would like a outline of the results of the research, we can email one to you, or present to you in person.

2) I have been made surgical director of the brand new transgender surgery program at Mount Sinai. That’s right – Mount Sinai, being the progressive place that it is, saw am opportunity and need to take a leadership position in the area of Transgender Health and created the first full-spectrum academic program in the U.S. focused on transgender surgery and care.

This was such an interesting and innovative idea, that I thought it would make a good documentary. I pitched the idea to a well-known director and we have started scouting interviews and are in the process of making a fundraising trailer.

If I could just be really forward, I was wondering if you would be interested in supporting this documentary? If so, the producer, director and I would love to come and give you the pitch in person. This is an exciting, groundbreaking project – both the center and the documentary – that will do good for the world. I hope you can be a part of it.

Best regards,

Jess Ting

There is no record of Epstein’s response or whether he responded to Ting’s request for funding, but several years later a transgender propaganda documentary titled Born To Be, after Ting’s work in “transgender medicine,” was released to great acclaim.

Ting shows up hundreds of times in the Epstein files; according to one media outlet, the emails document “a yearslong relationship between Ting and Epstein that encompassed travel to Epstein’s private island, visits to his homes, coordination of medical care through Epstein’s staff, and direct outreach seeking Epstein’s support for research and for a new transgender surgery program at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City.” Ting has claimed that the relationship was merely professional.

In responding to media questions about his long relationship with Epstein – which continued, based on the available emails, right through 2017 – Ting attempted to portray himself as an LGBT pioneer being attacked for his work. “Since creating this program in gender affirming surgery, I have been the subject of death threats, bomb threats, stalkers, and protestors,” he responded. “Despite that all, I remain committed to devoting my career to providing care to trans and nonbinary patients.” None of that, of course, explains why he spent so much time with a convicted sex offender and pedophile.

Neither Pritzker nor Trivers, who maintained friendly contact with Epstein long after his conviction for pedophilia, have publicly responded to these latest revelations.

lifesitenews