Month: May 2025

In 2009 Newsweek magazine reported on “South Africa’s New White Flight” and the high rate of violent crime there as the main reason for emigration:

“The primary driver for emigration among all groups, but especially whites, who still retain the majority of South Africa’s wealth, is fear of crime. With more than 50 killings a day, South Africa has one of the highest per capita murder rates in the world. The same goes for rape—ranking the country alongside conflict zones such as Sierra Leone, Colombia and Afghanistan…”

Fast forward to 2025 when the BBC reported that “almost 70,000 South Africans, the vast majority of them white Afrikaners and descendants of Dutch and French settlers who began arriving at the Cape in the late 17th century, were interested in United States asylum.”

In April 2025, South African businessman Rob Hersov, a 5th-generation Afrikaner, told Dave Rubin that the country under President Cyril Ramaphosa is slowly going bankrupt, and that the country was in the midst of a political and economic crisis and fraught with corruption.

“South Africa is infected with the evil woke mind more than in America,” he said. “We’ve got it times two and there’s no momentum in South Africa to reverse it.”

He then added: “South Africa needs a big wake up call.”

That wake up call has come in the person of Donald J. Trump who recently welcomed 59 white South Afrikaners refugee status in the United States because of that country’s racist attacks on its white citizens because they are the descendents of whites who upheld apartheid.

Anti-white South African laws go way beyond the Expropriation Act, signed into law by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in January 2025 that allows land seizures by the state without compensation.

The law gives the government the right to seize not only farmland but any property from whites, since they are the primary land owners, when the government deems it is in the national interest.

Defenders of the law are fond of saying that because it has not been enacted yet whites have no reason to complain, yet the mere fact it is on the books is tantamount to aiming a loaded gun at South Africa’s minority white population.

Hersov explained that the law even gives the government the right to “take the watch off my arm…. They barely need to justify it.”

While news media outlets like USA Today, the New York Times and The Guardian make light of President Trump’s assertion that white South Afrikaners are “fleeing genocide”-these publications quote Ramaphosa’s lie that the [Expropriation Act] hasn’t been enacted yet” as the reason why the plight of Afrikaners is a “false narrative,” they fail to mention South Africa’s 140 or so anti white laws that put white lives at risk.

According to Hersov:

“There are so many other laws in South Africa that are anti-white, race-based and make it almost impossible for businesses to thrive there.”

In fact, “South Africa wasn’t stolen; it was given away to the African National Congress (ANC), who dismantled a thriving nation through corruption, incompetence, and greed,” Hersov said. “It’s time to stop making excuses and start demanding real leadership to rebuild the country’s future.”

The ANC is the party that freed South Africa from apartheid in 1990 but lost its parliamentary majority in 2024, although it still holds considerable sway and influence along with the country’s Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a Marxist-Leninist pan-Africanist political party.

Under its current racist black leadership, South Africa-the country’s next national election is scheduled for 2029-has the highest unemployment in the world.

One anti-white law impacts business because it mandates that every business in the country must have 30% black ownership. Is it any wonder then that South African Airlines, once the premier airline in Africa, is now bankrupt? Even the country’s electrical supply system (the Eskom Electricity Supply Commission) is failing: it shuts down for at least 4-5 hours a day, leaving citizens without electricity.

And yet despite its 140 race-based laws, all of them anti white, organizations like the ADL claim that “white supremacists have seized upon some of the farm-related violence in South Africa since the end of apartheid to peddle a propaganda campaign.”

Mainstream media-propagandists posing as journalists-like USA Today delight in headlines such as: “White South Africans arrive in US. Trump’s ‘genocide’ claim disputed.”

The blatant racism of South Africa’s government became fairly obvious in the comments and statements made by Ebrahim Rasool, South Africa’s former ambassador to the United States, before the Trump Administration sent Rasool packing.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Rasool a “race-baiting politician,” when the black Muslim radical said during an online lecture that President Trump was trying to “project white victimhood as a dog whistle” as the white population faced becoming a minority in the United States.

“We see it in the domestic politics of the USA, the Maga movement as a response not simply to a supremacist instinct, but to very clear data that shows great demographic shifts in the USA in which the voting electorate in the USA is projected to become 48% white,” Rasool stated.

Clearly, this is not someone who should wear the mantle of ambassador, especially when he suggested that South Africa was under attack because “we are the historical antidote to supremacism.”

According to this logic, the historical antidote to white supremacism would be another form of supremacism: black supremacism.

Rasool’s slip of the tongue certainly belies Ramaphosa’s “false narrative” lie.

Focus on Western Islamism (FWI), a forum that educates readers about the threat posed by Islamism, labeled Rasool a terror-connected Islamist diplomat in 2024:

“In 2004, following Israel’s assassination of Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Rasool, then serving as finance minister in South Africa’s Western Cape, described the Hamas founder as ‘one of the greatest inspirations.’ He prayed that Palestinians, according to writer and broadcaster Joel Pollak, will ‘stand up to these enemies and never succumb, that they fight and they fight under a flag of Islam.’”

But leftists in the United States, especially as represented by the most Marxist Church in Christendom (Episcopal), a Church that has swapped The Book of Common Prayer for Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, has pledged not to help the white refugees because they are privileged  and their tales of persecution is a myth.

In the meantime, we have President Cyril Ramaphosa calling the group of 59 white South Africans who have moved to the US to resettle “cowards,” adding “they’ll be back soon.”

The left’s opinion of South African refugees is that Trump’s executive order in February 2025 granting refugee status to Afrikaners is a travesty because they are the descendents of Afrikaners who repressed the black majority during apartheid.

As The Guardian put it:  “White South Africans typically have 20 times the wealth of Black people…. The Black South African unemployment rate is 46.1%, compared with 9.2% for white people.”

The logic being: when you have most of the wealth, you still stand in the shadow of privilege and persecution can’t happen to you.

Despite, of course, the raw data reported by Genocide Watch and The Spectator-data ignored by the mainstream press-that:

“In South Africa, white farmers have for years been exposed to an unprecedented wave of violence. Statistically, a farm is attacked every day in South Africa. South Africa has the world’s highest murder rate, but the murder rate among white South Africans is three times higher than the national average, while that of white farmers is six times higher. Often, the victims are tortured and ill-treated for hours before being killed.”

Don’t Complain About Genocide If You’re White | Frontpage Mag

By Noel S. Williams

Obviously, Biden wasn’t in charge of his own faculties, let alone the White House.  Clearly, the autopen was very busy, especially in those last-minute pardons.  The pen may have simplistic robotic features, but it doesn’t have a mind of its own like this scary tin man, that was even more animated than the “Terminator.”

Nope, the presidential autopen requires human supervision; it needs human hands to position it and start it.  They can weigh many pounds, and have a large surface area.  Here’s the one used by Obummer.  There’s a lot of space for potential fingerprints on that thing.

President Trump loves America; he loves his job.  He is hard working and vastly more conscientious than Biden.  If an Executive Order or pardon is worth signing, he does it himself, even while indulging questions from the annoying press in marathon sessions that would tire juniors.

In other words, if Biden’s autopen is around, it likely has untainted fingerprints from his leftist aiders and abettors (body snatchers?).  I doubt chain-of-custody would be jeopardized for the pen that ran the White House.  It’s unlikely they would turn it over willy-nilly to the movers to put next to classified documents in his garage.  It is probably squirreled away for “safekeeping.”  So, presuming it hasn’t been bleached, it may well have fingerprints on it.

The question is being repeated almost ad-infinitum:  Who was running the White House while sleepy Joe slept upstairs?  It’s an important question that deserves the attention of top forensic experts who can pull fingerprints from the plastics, Plexiglas, and any metal casing surrounding the autopen.  At a minimum, they should be able to determine if fingerprints have been scrubbed.  That, in itself, may be useful information — presuming we needed even more evidence of a cover up.

If fingerprints are recovered, and matched with White House staffers or imposters, they can be given a darn good interrogation. Hopefully, investigators and interrogators will be more diligent than those then-Secret Service defeatists who prematurely concluded the White House cocaine investigation in 2023.

Inspecting the physical state of the autopen should be one investigative avenue in answering one of the ineluctable questions in the biggest political scandal in recent American history:  Who the unelected heck dared to flout our sacred Constitution by imposing their radical leftist agenda on America as the figurehead president vacationed and slept?

americanthinker

A group of right-wing French mayors from the Les Républicains party have called for a ban on marriages between French citizens and illegal migrants.

The four argue marriage is now used as a tool for “backdoor regularisation” for the immigration status of many.

“It is unacceptable that mayors are legally compelled to officiate the marriages of individuals who are in the country illegally,” they wrote May 19 in Le Figaro. 

While the mayors say they respect their official duties, they argue that it comes with responsibilities, including not bypassing the law.

“We refuse to be reduced to mere executors of administrative decisions that go against common sense. We do not want to become unwitting accomplices in a system that abuses the law, and we can no longer tolerate our voices being ignored,” they wrote.

“What should be a moment of unity, shared joy, and affirmation of the Republic too often turns into a delicate balancing act, where our vigilance clashes with the State’s inertia and the shortcomings of the legal system,” they added.

They argue mayors should have the power to deny marriages between citizens and illegal immigrants without facing legal proceedings.

Article 63 of the French Civil Code gives mayors the task of verifying the consent of future spouses.

This law was designed to serve as a protection measure against forced marriages, sham marriages, or unions of convenience or interest.

The mayors said they do not want to hinder the right to marriage, but to prevent it from “being used as a backdoor regularisation tool, in defiance of the law on foreigners and the authority of the State.”

Two of the mayors, Robert Ménard and Marlène Mourier, have both refused to marry people, suspecting a sham marriage was taking place.

Ménard faced legal proceedings after refusing to officiate the marriage, after an investigation by public authorities found no evidence of fraud.

On February 16, France’s Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau expressed support for a draft law prohibiting marriage when one spouse was in France illegally.

“We all know that marriage can be used to give immigrants legal status,” he said, signalling a possible shift in government policy.

On May 13, President Emmanuel Macron recognised even if France recognised the “freedom to marry as a constitutional freedom, they are not protecting the mayor”.

Macron expressed his wish the bill passed in the French Senate “be rapidly registered in the Assembly,” France’s lower house.

brusselssignal

The plague of presentism seems to be on an unstoppable march. One might think that the exercise of projecting the values of the present day onto the past has been exposed often enough to discourage those practising it. But this is not the case: it is not only zealous activists who want to see artwork embodying one of the ‘guilty isms’ disappear but overeager bureaucrats, too.

A minor German government official was apparently so upset by the sight of a nude female statue in a Berlin federal office’s entrance hall that the sculpture was removed last year, German paper Bild learned. The historic sculpture of the Venus de’ Medici, the outlet reported, was perceived as “sexist” and was therefore returned to the Federal Art Administration last July.

The bronze statue, made in the early 18th century as a copy of a 1st-century BC marble now kept in the Uffizi museum of Florence, Italy, had embellished the entrance of the long-named Federal Office for Central Services and Unresolved Property Issues in the Weißensee district of Berlin. 

But the Equal Opportunities Officer of the said German office made a complaint, arguing that the displaying of the statue was in contravention of the Federal Equality Act. 

After Venus, or Aphrodite in Greek, the goddess of love in Greco-Hellenic culture, was banned from the Federal Office, the Federal Art Administration gave her to the Grassi Museum.

Museum director Dr. Olaf Thormann told Bild it was beyond him how “Venus Medici might be perceived as sexist. It … does not show any charismatic nudity. This alleged offence is a strange interpretation of art,” said Dr. Thormann.

“The female nude–just like the male nude–has existed in art history from the very beginning. To construct sexism from this misses the entirety of art history and, I would say, even the perspective on something deeply human,” he added.

While the worshippers of this new creed of ‘pudor’ are quick to banish art that reflects the grandeur and beauty of Greco-Hellenic culture but which, they claim, offends the sensitivities of certain groups of people, they are just as eager to impose their version of ‘equitable art’ on others, regardless of its aesthetic value. As we reported, this was the case in Florence, Italy, where an almost four-metre-high statue of gilded bronze depicting a black girl is now towering over the square, and will remain there until September, probably to remind the poor Florentines of their ’unconscious bias.’ The statue, titled Time Unfolding, is supposed to counterbalance a space dominated by ”male power.” 

O tempora, o mores.

europeanconservative

An English mother who was sentenced to nearly three years in prison over a social media post in the wake of the horrific murder of three children in Southport has been denied early release by the Court of Appeal.

The British judicial system is facing accusations of two-tier justice yet again after rejecting the appeal of 42-year-old mother Lucy Connolly to have her 31-month prison sentence reduced on Tuesday, The Telegraph reported.

Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor and mother of a 12-year-old daughter, was jailed in October over a social media post in the wake of the mass stabbing committed by second-generation migrant Axel Rudakubana, which left three young girls dead and left 10 injured at a children’s Taylor Swift dance party in Southport in July of last year.

Following the horrific attack, the English mother, who had previously lost her own son at the age of 19 months over NHS failings, took to the X social media platform to express her rage.

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it, take the treacherous government politicians with them,” adding: “I feel physically sick knowing what these [Southport] families will now have to endure. If that makes me racist, so be it.”

While she deleted the post just hours later, and later condemned the riots which broke out following the stabbing attack, she was swept up in the mass arrest campaign launched by British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

During the dragnet, over a thousand people were arrested, some of whom, like Connolly, for merely posting on the internet. The government also made efforts to release other criminals from jail early in order to clear space in Britain’s overcrowded prison system for those arrested in connection with the Southport riots.

Connolly pleaded guilty to “inciting racial hatred” resulting in an unusually lengthy sentence of 31 months. At the Court of Appeals, her lawyers argued that she did not fully understand what she was pleading guilty to and that the original judge in the case had not given due consideration to the impact the sentence would have on her 12-year-old daughter and ailing husband, who suffers from a bone marrow disease.

Nevertheless, three appeal judges shot down her bid for an early release on Tuesday, meaning that she will remain in prison at least until August. Despite having never committed another crime and winning plaudits for good behaviour while in prison, Connolly has also been denied temporary release to visit her family, as is often afforded to other prisoners.

The Free Speech Union (FSU), which assisted Connolly in her appeal, described the decision on Tuesday as “deeply disappointing” and said that her 31-month prison sentence was “plainly disproportionate.” The FSU noted that Connolly had received a longer prison sentence for her tweet than some of those who committed actual violence during the Southport riots, including by the same judge in her case.

Lord Young of Acton, the General Secretary of the FSU, said: “This is terribly disappointing. How can it be right for Lucy to have been condemned to spend more than two-and-a-half years in jail for a single tweet when members of grooming gangs who plead guilty to the sexual exploitation of children get lower sentences? Lucy should be at home with her 12-year-old daughter and husband, not rotting in jail.”

The case has also drawn condemnation from the political sphere. Reform UK deputy leader and MP for Boston and Skegness, Richard Tice, said that the decision to reject her early release was “disgraceful” and that it confirmed that Britain has a “two-tier” and “politically motivated” justice system.

Former Prime Minister Liz Truss said: “Lucy Connolly should be released immediately and reunited with her family. The severity of her sentence is completely unjustifiable and a shocking example of two-tier justice, which now prevails in Britain. We are now suffering the consequences of a system that has been captured by Leftist ideology.”

Connolly’s case has also drawn international condemnation, including from Trump ally and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who told GB News on Tuesday that he plans to raise the issue with the U.S. State Department.

“Is this the way a liberal democracy and an ally of the United States acts?” Kirk questioned. He lamented that while Britain “birthed free speech to the world”, the UK is now “becoming a totalitarian country.”

breitbart

A gay Jewish teacher in Berlin has spoken out about enduring months of abuse, harassment, and threats from elementary school students, most of whom have a migration background, driving him into post-traumatic stress disorder and forcing him to take medical leave.

Oziel Inácio-Stech told the Süddeutsche Zeitung that he had been the target of persistent insults and threats after revealing to his pupils that he is married to a man. “I’m living in a nightmare,” he said. “I never expected to experience something like this in Germany.”

Inácio-Stech said he had long hesitated to come out to his students due to their family backgrounds. “The parents of many students are very religious and come from traditional cultures,” he explained. In fact, as Remix News has previously reported, more than 80 percent of students at some schools in Berlin are from a migration background and do not speak German at home.

Eventually, five years ago, just before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, he decided to speak openly about his marriage, a decision supported at the time by his colleagues and the teachers’ union GEW.

The backlash began almost immediately. One 12-year-old student shouted, “What, you’re gay? I’ll tell the whole school.” From there, the abuse spread quickly. In a fifth-grade class in May 2023, a student from a Lebanese family became verbally and physically aggressive. According to a statement by a colleague, the student made “jokes about homosexuals,” physically threatened Inácio-Stech, and insulted him in front of the class. “The class was out of control,” the colleague noted, and another teacher had to remove the student.

Inácio-Stech contacted the boy’s mother, who pleaded with him not to file a formal complaint, citing concerns over custody due to her separation. Though he agreed at the time, the same student returned just two weeks later to publicly hurl further insults in the schoolyard, calling him “disgusting” and “not a man” in front of hundreds of pupils.

In another incident, he was asked graphic questions about his sex life, including whether he is “the man or the woman” during sexual intercourse. “You’re sure to be the one to get fucked,” one foreign student quipped.

The harassment did not stop there. Students began spreading rumors, refusing to attend his lessons, and shouting through classroom doors that he was a “family disgrace” and “impure.” One student told him outright, “You gay, get out of here. Islam is the boss here.”

Inácio-Stech also recounted an incident where a pupil said Christians would soon be “destroyed.”

Other teachers at the school have reported similar difficulties. One described a rising influence of religious conservatism: “Islam is drawing wider and wider circles at our school,” she said. “We Germans are drowning here.” She also described a pupil telling her, “You can go, we don’t need you here.” Another staff member reported parents attempting to impose modesty rules on female teachers.

The school environment has left Inácio-Stech with panic attacks and in psychotherapeutic treatment. One former Israeli colleague reportedly left the school entirely after Muslim students boycotted his lessons due to his Jewish background.

Despite the constant attacks on his way of life, Inácio-Stech says he is resisting changing his political allegiance to the right. “I want to remain tolerant and not become an AfD voter now.”

In October last year, Remix News reported on another interview given by a longstanding teacher in a migrant-dominated school in Germany, where she described everyday life as “absolute hell.”

At our comprehensive school, 80 to 90 percent of the students had a migrant background. Many come from predominantly Islamic countries such as Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Algeria, Bosnia, Chechnya, Afghanistan, or Pakistan, but also from Russia and North Africa,” she told Focus magazine.

“When students insult us or want to offend, they usually do so in sexualized, fecal language,” she warned.

She told Focus that she was routinely insulted with incredibly brutal language, including students saying: “You old whore’s daughter,” “I’ll fuck your head,” “whore,” “slut,” “cunt,” and threats like “I’ll give you AIDS,” while others told her, “Shut up, you Jewish whore!”

rmx.news

Ever since the withdrawal of USAID, people have started looking at how the EU spends their money—and each week seems to bring new shocking revelations of the absurd waste, corruption, and socio-political engineering that Brussels has been financing.

Now, a new report from the conservative think tank MCC Brussels, released today, sheds light on yet another troubling trend—taxpayer-funded “research” on so-called “hate speech” and “disinformation,” described by the author as a key part of the EU’s efforts to control the narrative of public discourse and crack down on dissenting voices.

The report is titled Manufacturing Misinformation: the EU-Funded Propaganda War Against Free Speech, and was written by Dr. Norman Lewis, a British expert on digital communication regulation with over two decades of experience.

While researching the topic, Dr. Lewis identified 349 projects funded by the European Commission, mainly through the Horizon research program, focused on countering ‘hate speech’ and ‘disinformation.’ The cost? €649 million. That’s 31% more than what Brussels spends on transnational cancer research.

“This massive allocation of taxpayers’ money has been consciously used to fund an Orwellian disinformation complex to dictate and control the language of public debate,” the think tank said in a press release, shared with europeanconservative.com.

Using numerous concrete examples, the report demonstrates that this is not a benign act of responsible government but a systematic assault on free speech in Europe, replacing open debate with “a top-down, authoritarian, curated consensus” to benefit Brussels’ agenda.

Dr. Lewis also identified a list of deliberately ambiguous and euphemistic terms that often accompany such projects, which he refers to as “NEUspeak” (after Orwell’s “newspeak”), designed to build an artificial ideological framework. The goal? To control the political narrative and delegitimize opponents, primarily on the populist Right.

The goal is to create a “moral panic” that justifies sweeping censorship tools, such as the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Democracy Shield (EDS). 

As is often the case, these projects reveal that the EU is dependent on inventing the problems it then comes in to solve. What’s framed as “neutral research” is often just “the ritual confirmation of preordained political assumptions,” with NGOs and academia financially incentivized to confirm the Commission’s pre-existing talking points.

According to Dr. Lewis, keeping hundreds of organizations in this corrupt, self-serving loop also diminishes civil society and academic research. “There is no quest for truth or new knowledge, only compliance with an elitist bureaucratic narrative designed to protect the status quo,” the author said.

But perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the report is that many of the identified projects involve the development of advanced AI systems. These are tasked not only with the real-time monitoring and censorship of unwelcome content, but also with influencing user behavior by “training” young people online to become autonomous “agents” or “speech police” for the EU narrative.

This report is not merely an exposé of financial misuse but “a democratic intervention,” MCC Brussels’ press release added. 

“When language is narrowed, softened, obfuscated, or stripped of meaning, so is the possibility of resistance and the development of alternatives,” the think tank said. “The Commission, by defining what may be said and how it must be framed, does not protect democracy but undermines it.”

EU Spends €650 Million of Taxpayer Money on Policing ‘Hate Speech’ ━ The European Conservative

An asylum seeker who claimed his sexuality had “changed” has lost his appeal to re-enter the UK after it emerged he is now married to a woman.

Esmir Demaj – from Albania – initially petitioned for the right to stay in Britain on the grounds that he was gay, but was later found to have deliberately “misled” the Home Office.

The Upper Tribunal of the Asylum and Immigration Chamber dismissed his case after determining he had done nothing to notify the Government of his “changed circumstances”.

The tribunal heard that Demaj had a history of “absconding” immigration control.

Demaj’s initial asylum claim was refused in April 2023, after which he returned to Albania. He subsequently applied to return to the UK to join his wife, but this request was refused by immigration officials in September 2023.

The tribunal’s judgement stated: “[Mr Demaj] had unsuccessfully claimed asylum in the United Kingdom on the basis of his claimed homosexuality. He is now married to a woman and claims that his sexuality has ‘changed’.”

The Albanian national appealed the Home Office decision and took his case to the First-tier Tribunal.

During this hearing, the judge acknowledged that being “currently in a committed heterosexual relationship” doesn’t necessarily mean his previous claim to have been gay was “untrue”.

Despite the judge accepting that “sexuality is a spectrum”, the tribunal noted that Demaj’s relationship with his current wife occurred simultaneously with his claimed homosexuality.

The court found he had “done nothing” to notify the Secretary of State about his changed circumstances.

In dismissing his appeal, the judge concluded that Demaj “deliberately chose not to disclose that he was now in a relationship with a woman and had reconciled with his father because he believed it would not assist him in remaining in the UK”.

The judge stated: “I find it likely this was a deliberate attempt to mislead the [Home Office].”

The tribunal found that Demaj could not succeed with his claim because he had “contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intention of the Immigration Rules”. Unsatisfied with this outcome, Demaj escalated his case to the Upper Tribunal.

Upper Tribunal Judge Clive Lane heard evidence relating to Demaj “absconding” from immigration authorities.

Judge Lane ultimately dismissed Demaj’s appeal, bringing an end to his attempts to re-enter the UK after what the tribunal determined was a deliberate effort to mislead immigration officials about his circumstances.

Under the European Convention of Human Rights, individuals who may face persecution because of their sexual orientation can claim asylum in the UK. This provision offers protection to those genuinely at risk due to their sexuality in their home countries.

gbnews

Welcome to DEI. Here’s a glimpse of what’s happening in Leicester, England…

My son has been pulled from all teachings of Islam, and they are teaching it EVERY week.

He takes his bible and reads that instead in a separate room!

Parents MUST resist this and speak out! I am interested in any other parents in the same position

pic.twitter.com/Z84yiqF0vu

— Mark Heath 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🙏🏻 (@MarkHeath45) May 14, 2025

frontpagemag

Europe has fought off Islamic conquest for 1,600 years. The struggle appears to be winding down:

A Danish court on Friday for the first time meted out a verdict in the first criminal case using the country’s new law prohibiting “improper treatment of a religious text.” The court sentenced Islamism critic Rasmus Paludan and one of his associates to each pay a fine of DKK10,000 (just over €1,300) for destroying copies of the Quran at Folkemødet, a civic festival aimed at fostering open debate, in Allinge, Bornholm, last summer.

Paludan was expressing opposition to the policy of displacing the European population with Muslim colonists.

In the tent of Paludan’s migration-critical political party, Stram Kurs, the two tore pages out of copies of the Quran, which Muslims consider a holy book, put the book on a grill, and let it drop into puddles on the ground.

Doing that to a Bible will earn you a pat on the head from the establishment, even if technically the law applies to holy books other than the Koran.

Paludan can be thankful that the Great Replacement has not yet reached full flower. By the time Muslims attain majority status, dissidents like him will be summarily killed.

Moonbattery Islamic Law Comes to Denmark – Moonbattery