by Eric Utter
The Daily Mail has reported that “Sixty-seven dog breeds could be banned in Britain if new breeding guidelines set by parliament become mandatory.”
It added that “The all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for animal welfare has launched a new tool to determine if a dog is healthy.”
This tool doesn’t concern itself with a dog’s actual health and eschews clues such as a shiny coat, general disposition and demeanor, healthy appetite, etc. No, these assessments/guidelines include “extreme” or “exaggerated attributes” such as “mottled coloration, excessive skin folds, bulging outward-turning eyes, drooping eyelids, under or overbite and a muzzle that interrupts breathing.” The assessment, currently voluntary, is reportedly expected to become law within five years, although those behind the new “tool” claim these reports are “misinformation.”
If mottled coloration, excessive skin folds and drooping eyelids are problematic, most humans in the U.K. would be banned, as well.
Beagles, dachshunds, Great Danes and St. Bernards are among breeds that would likely be targeted by the new guidance.
Well, “beagle” has “eagle” within it, and that is an American symbol most unwelcome in Keir Starmer’s Britain. Dachshund? German; equals Hitler. Great Dane? Fairly Decent Dane would be less ableist and less likely to offend those of lesser stature. St. Bernard? Carries unacceptable Christian overtones. Even on a purely DEI basis, these breeds are problematic!
In truth, the proposed new health tool is likely a response to the U.K.’s surging Muslim population, as Islamic law considers dogs dirty and unworthy. Much as it abhors alcohol. (It is no coincidence that many hundreds of British pubs, once iconic pillars of British communities, have closed in recent years.)
Maybe the APPG could send the people’s pooches to a Fauci facility … or ship them off to Canada to be disposed of via that nation’s all-encompassing Medical-Assistance-In-Dying program.
But what of other exaggerated attributes, such as British Parliamentarians’ own cravenness and spinelessness in pre-emptively surrendering to the surging population of Muslims at the cost of their fellow Englishman’s prosperity, safety and dignity?
But let’s not worry about rampant rape gangs or the prevalence of pedophilia when there is the existential problem of man’s best friend to deal with, APPG wankers! Even though many of us consider dogs to be our furry friends…or even family members.
“Who let the dogs out” in the U.K.?
The very same people who let the “undocumented immigrants” in.
And they want to get rid of Lassie.