Author: fredalanmedforth
Sharia in Italy: Burned with an iron because she did not wear a veil
She was abused in her parents’ home for months, maybe even years: Her mother allegedly even burned her with an iron, her brother not only beat her but even went so far as to hit her with a bottle. An affair that has now led to a sentence of three years for the elder brother and four months for the mother: The sister-in-law also stood trial, but was acquitted.
This was the verdict of the court of Brescia (Italy) in a trial for ill-treatment and assault initiated following the complaint (2019) of a young girl of Pakistani origin, who was only 15 years old at the time.
The girl, who was harassed by her Islamic relatives, reportedly ran away from home several times until she reported the incidents. She was later placed in a sheltered community and even attempted to take her own life in the family home. According to the public prosecutor’s office, represented by prosecutor Donato Greco, the abuse continued for months. However, this was always denied by the family members, although the judges eventually acknowledged they were guilty.
Quelle: VoxNews / https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/scharia-in-italien-mit-dem-buegeleisen-verbrannt-weil-sie-keine-verschleierung-trug/
British Farmers Under ATTACK For Being Too ‘White’ đ đ¤Śââď¸ CLOWN WORLD!
German Elections Might Be Re-Run in Berlin Over Vote Irregularities
Last yearâs German federal elections in Berlin were so riddled with irregularities that at least six areas in the capital should have a do-over, the countryâs elections administrator said this week.
In the first-ever public hearing of the election examination committee of the German parliament (Bundestag), MPs were told by elections administrator George Thiel that half of Berlinâs constituencies (six of twelve) had experienced enough irregularities on the September 26th election last year to warrant a repeat of the vote.
Thiel said that the elections experienced âa complete systemic failureâ and questioned: âWhat else has to happen that we see elections as repeatable or illegal?â
The election, which was held amid coronavirus restrictions, was also plagued by the fact that it was scheduled on the same day as the Berlin Marathon, which caused traffic jams, resulting in some polling stations being closed for up to two hours for lack of ballots, Tagesspiegel reported.
Thiel also reported that over 250 stations were kept open past the 6:30 cut off time, wrong ballots were used, and underage people were allowed to vote, as has been previously reported by Germanyâs public broadcaster.
The six Berlin constituencies pointed to for potential re-elections included Mitte, Pankow, Reinickendorf, Steglitz-Zehlendorf, Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf and Berlin-Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg. The elections administrator also said that the Reinickendorf constituency could have its vote overturned as it was decided by such a narrow margin.
In last yearâs elections, former Chancellor Angela Merkelâs centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) suffered a humiliating loss to the leftist Social Democrat Party (SPD), which secured 25.7 per cent of the vote compared to 24.1 per cent for the CDU.
As the SPD failed to secure enough of the vote share to govern the country outright, now-Chancellor Olaf Scholz was forced to form a coalition government with the German Greens and the Free Democrats (FDP).
The CDU has seized on the voting irregularities, with the partyâs Berlin Secretary-General Stefan Evers saying: âWhile in other parts of the country the Bundestag election was organized flawlessly despite the flood disaster, the election itself became a disaster in Berlin.
âIt is obvious that the mistakes of the Senate are so serious that at least large parts of the Bundestag and parliamentary elections must be repeated. Probably the election to the state parliament is even flawed overall.â
While the six constituencies would likely not be enough to overturn the national results of the election, a revote could serve to further damage the leftist Chancellor Scholz, whose party last week lost a local election to the CDU in North Rhine-Westphalia, a bellwether state.
“Protect your families, you infidels. I will cut your throats like I did in Syria”. : Man convicted of threats in France but acquitted of glorifying terrorism
On the night of May 21-22, he was provoked by the noise of his neighbours and shouted insults at them for over an hour. With two bottles of vodka in his pocket, he recited the encyclopaedia of insults from A to Z, garnished with a few references to Daech. “Protect your families, infidels. I will cut your throats, as I did in Syria. I will drink your blood.” The group of young partygoers across the street, laughing more than worrying, videotape the scene.
The Magistrate is trying to ascertain whether the offence of glorification of terrorism has been committed. According to case law, such an offence only exists if the accused attempts to incite or arrange terrorism. Otherwise, it is a simple threat. ” I don’t know anything about it at all. I don’t even have an Arab background or anything,” the accused claims awkwardly. I’m just a normal Spaniard.” For the prosecution, the remarks made in public may constitute an endorsement. He demands eighteen months in prison, ten of them suspended.
“The qualification trumps the real personality. It’s more pathetic than anything else,” says Camille Fournier-Guinut for the defence. The lawyer recalls that her client, who is undergoing rehabilitation, “has taken a big step forward in terms of criminal law”. “He needs a sentence that will allow him to get away from alcohol. He is not a dangerous lunatic”. The court agrees. The 30-year-old, who was acquitted of glorifying terrorism, will be given a total of six months in prison without parole and three months on probation. He will serve his sentence in semi-freedom*.Sud-Ouest
*Semi-freedom is a form of execution for custodial sentences that allows the sentenced person to pursue a professional activity, attend classes, vocational training or internships, undergo medical treatment or participate in the life of his or her family outside prison, with any other available time necessarily spent inside prison.Wikipedia