Nativity Scenes: A Legacy of Faith and Resistance to Cherish

Provençal Nativity scene Wikimedia Commons, © Guillaume Piolle / CC BY 3.0

A centuries-old tradition, the representation of the baby Jesus in his manger brings the mystery of the Incarnation to life in town squares, churches and families. In France, their popularity is inextricably linked to the persecutions of the Revolution. Today, the battle over nativity scenes continues to rage—a sign of contradiction for the world.

Legend and history trace the invention of the nativity scene back to the 13th century and St. Francis of Assisi, who staged the birth of Jesus with animals and shepherds in the small village of Greccio for Christmas in 1223. Returning from the Holy Land, he was struck by the natural setting of a small cave that seemed perfect for recreating, on Italian soil, the first moments of Christ on earth. He set up a manger and hay, brought in a donkey and an ox, and then celebrated Mass, surrounded by brothers and villagers who came to admire the Gospel re-enactment—with fervour, songs and torches. A few years later, a chapel was built near the cave, and the Franciscans spread the simple and charming devotion of the nativity scene in their convents, soon to be imitated by other religious orders.

However, representations of the Nativity are attested to before this episode. A century earlier, during the ‘mysteries,’ those semi-secular, semi-religious performances held in churches and cathedral forecourts, the faithful already enjoyed representing the birth of Christ ‘in real life.’

Later, in the 16th century, the rise of nativity scenes in churches coincided with the Counter-Reformation and the Council of Trent. Encouraged by Jesuits and Oratorians, the nativity scene became one of the most obvious manifestations of the divine incarnation. Magnificent nativity scenes with expressive and colourful figures, sometimes of imposing dimensions, adorned churches from the beginning of Advent until the Feast of the Purification of the Virgin, which marks the end of the Christmas season at the beginning of February. 

Some countries stand out with particularly rich traditions: in Catholic Central Europe, where Baroque art triumphed, or in Naples, some nativity scenes are true masterpieces, often created by anonymous artists. In the nativity scene, the baby Jesus is humbly worshipped. A few decades later, in Central Europe, devotion to the Infant Jesus of Prague perpetuated this tradition.

The preferred location for nativity scenes was the church. For a long time, domestic nativity scenes were a rare privilege reserved for wealthy aristocratic families. In France, the Revolution led to the widespread development of family nativity scenes, particularly in Provence, where they acquired a very distinctive style.

Political upheaval was accompanied by religious persecution. After imposing the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, the Revolution went on to close the churches. In December 1791, in Marseille, the revolutionary authorities closed the churches. Nativity scenes were effectively banned. The faithful were thus deprived of the opportunity to contemplate these touching scenes depicting Joseph, Mary, and the baby Jesus during the Christmas period. A Marseillais named Jean-Louis Lagnel then had the idea of moulding ‘santons’ (meaning ‘little saints’ in Provençal) in raw clay, which were easy to reproduce, so that devout families could pray at home, away from prying eyes and public persecutors. The forbidden faith was then passed on within families, in secret, and the nativity scene became one of the main symbols of this inner resistance. The nativity scenes were displayed in glass boxes, with rockery decorations combining paper flowers and small pieces of glass.

The practice was initially limited to the city of Marseille but soon spread throughout Provence. Gradually, the Provençal nativity scene became enriched with a whole range of unique folklore. A popular story gave meaning to all the figurines that took their place in it: the pastoral. In this simple, naive story, we find the central figures of Joseph and Mary, flanked by the ox and the donkey, but also a whole cohort of colourful characters expressing the life of a Provençal village. 

There are several versions of the pastoral story. The most famous, written by Antoine Maurel in 1844, is entirely in Provençal. In the twentieth century, a French version by Yvan Audouard made it known throughout France. It features very human characters. The good Saint Joseph, rough but full of common sense, is on the verge of losing his nerve in the face of the impossible task entrusted to him by God: to take care of his newborn son on a freezing night when the mistral wind is blowing. The Virgin Mary, the ‘good mother’ of the people of Marseille, is a figure full of gentleness and contemplation who meditates in her heart on the mystery of the incarnation of her divine son. The pastoral scene is also an opportunity to showcase figures borrowed from Provençal literature, such as the young lovers Vincent and Mireille, inspired by Frédéric Mistral’s poem, who come to have their thwarted love blessed and sanctified before the divine cradle.

In France, the Provençal nativity scene has now become a tradition widely shared beyond the borders of historic Provence. In churches and families, nativity scenes come in a thousand different forms, varying in degree of deviation from their southern origins. Not so long ago, it was commonplace to see nativity scenes on display in shops, schools, and public squares. In 1960, Paris proudly hosted “the world’s largest nativity scene” under a huge marquee.

Today, taking us back to the dark days of the Revolution, nativity scenes have become a political issue. Installing a nativity scene in full view of everyone, rather than simply in one’s living room, has become an act of provocation that will certainly not lead to the guillotine but can get you into serious trouble with the courts. Some elected officials have understood this well and do not hesitate to engage in a power struggle with the justice system in order to install nativity scenes in places where they are no longer welcome. This is an opportunity for them to reaffirm their attachment to a centuries-old tradition that marks France’s Catholic identity. Without always realising it, they are thus reconnecting with a painful past, when the domestic nativity scene was a sign of refusal to submit to revolutionary madness.

In December 2025, the hostility of a handful of embittered personalities towards nativity scenes was encouraged by the celebration of the 120th anniversary of the vote on the law establishing the famous “French-style secularism.” Cases of legal action and attempts to remove nativity scenes from town halls and public squares are on the rise. But these hysterical attacks only serve to unnecessarily clog up the courts and ruffle the feathers of a growing number of French citizens who, fortunately, have retained their childlike spirit and know how to be moved by the baby Jesus. According to a recent poll, 79% of French people—across all age groups and political affiliations—are in favour of installing nativity scenes in town halls. As the angels would sing, “Gloria in excelsis Deo”—the battle for hearts and minds has therefore been largely won.

europeanconservative

Victory: Govt Won’t Buy Permanent Homes For Migrants in Child Sex Assault Protest Town

Screengrab youtube

The Essex town of Epping which saw major protests after a local girl was sexually assaulted by a newly-arrived boat illegal won’t have a permanent migrant plantation forced on it, as the government backs down from buying up local properties for its guests.

Protesters gained a minor victory against the British government, forcing the Home Office and Shabana Mahmood to abandon plans to end the ongoing scandal of housing vast numbers of boat migrant arrivals in publicly-funded hotels by instead buying up local homes and apartments for them to live in instead. Having called the plan “tone-deaf”, the local community leader said residents can “breathe a sigh of relief”, although the plan remains in place to buy property across the rest of the country.

Citizens wing big in Epping. Image – social media.

Epping in the County of Essex had been the site of major and ongoing protests over the course of this year after a notorious migrant sex pest housed at the government-contracted Bell Hotel sexually assaulted a child in the town. Despite Epping becoming the national flashpoint on the matter, and inspiring similar protests elsewhere across the summer, the government’s housing contractor Clearsprings still intended to buy up property in what has been described as a “luxurious” part of the town for migrant arrivals.

While the government may believe it will solve the politically poisonous migrant hotels issue by simply buying up homes for alternate accommodation, it is already clear this merely creates new community grievances which can also lead to protests. As reported at the time of the Ballymena protests, in analysis of the social and economic issues which built the pyre sparked by another sex assault, Dougie Beattie stated:

…the alleged attack on a 14 year old girl, now that isn’t what is at the very heart of this problem… There are other problems in social housing in Northern Ireland… the [government’s contractor] has bought up contracts with all the private landlords and what that has done is reduced the housing stock, but it has also done is set up the price of rent much, much higher.

Because of course the [government] pays much, much more than an ordinary person going to hire a house… [the government’s contractor] has offered all the private landlords twice the rent in order to keep these migrants because, of course, the government is giving them big money to get them out of the hotels.

So what’s happened is the people of Ballymena that lived here, born here, actually can’t get housed here and that too is causing friction in this area.

Epping, if nowhere else, is to avoid this fate even if the Bell migrant hotel remains open for now. The Daily Telegraph cites the remarks of the leader of Epping council, Chris Whitbread, who hailed the victory of the government turning away from the “tone deaf” attempt to buy up property for migrants in the protest-stricken town.

He said:

This is excellent news for our community and residents can breathe a sigh of relief. I wrote with a sense of disbelief when Clearsprings notified us of their intention to procure eight flats in Buckhurst Hill to accommodate asylum seekers.

We’re already hosting two Home Office asylum seeker hotels in the district. The impact of events over the last six months has been deeply felt across our district and has created significant challenges for community cohesion and public safety.

Residents have experienced fear and uncertainty, and the strain on local resources has been considerable. This withdrawal shows Clearsprings and the Home Office have listened to us, seen sense and taken the right decision. We hope they show similar good sense with regards to the Bell Hotel and move to an early closure.

The sex assault of a local girl in Epping earlier this year took on an additional dimension of government failure after the man arrested and convicted for the attack on the 14-year-old, Ethiopian boat migrant Hadush Kebatu, was accidentally released from prison. He was later re-arrested after a days-long manhunt and deported.

breitbart

UK: A statue of Baby Jesus was vandalized at St. Patrick’s Church in Edinburgh

A statue of the Baby Jesus has been vandalised at a centuries-old Edinburgh church on Christmas Eve.

The incident took place at St Patrick’s Church, in the Cowgate area of the Old Town, ahead of midnight mass on December 24.

The church shared the sad news on social media at around 10.30pm.

In a post on Facebook, they wrote: “We ask prayers for reparation tonight on this Vigil of the Lord’s Nativity, for the attack upon the Child Jesus, taken from the throne above the altar; also for the desecration of relics in the Lady Chapel, violence at the crib in the side aisle, and blood spilled in the sanctuary, side chapel and nave.

“At the Easter Vigil we also had threats made against us; tonight another told us ‘you’re finished here’.

“We will bless the Church again after cleaning up the desecration. Encouraging all souls to turn to our patron, that St Patrick’s prayers will protect this oasis of prayer in the Old Town.”

scotsman

St. Patrick’s Catholic Church in Edinburgh was ATTACKED tonight, on Christmas Eve

• Baby Jesus BEHEADED

• Blood spilled in the sanctuary, side chapel and nave

• Relics desecrated

• Church threatened ‘You’re finished here’

Catholic Arena

SWEDEN: Egyptian Migrant Who Murdered His Two Young Children Has Been Transferred To A Women’s Prison After Changing Legal Sex Marker To “Female”

A father who murdered his two young children has been transferred to a women’s prison after beginning to identify as transgender. Paulus Said Foukaih Abdelshahed, an Egyptian national who had been living in Sweden for almost two decades, is serving a life sentence for the killings.

According to the original indictment filed by the Prosecution Authority in November 2024, police and ambulance services were dispatched to the family’s home in Södertälje, Sweden, on the morning of April 23 following a 112 emergency call made by Abdelshahed himself. He reportedly told dispatchers that his two children – a boy and a girl, both under the age of 10 – were not breathing.

When officers arrived at the residence, they found both children dead. Abdelshahed was later arrested at along with the children’s mother, but she was quickly released after investigators ruled her out as a suspect and determined that the murders had occurred when Abdelshahed was alone with the children.

Court documents and subsequent reporting state that prosecutors determined Abdelshahed had placed bags over each child’s head and pumped helium into the bags through a hose, depriving them of oxygen. The prosecution described the killings as intentional, carefully planned, and particularly ruthless. Investigators recovered items from the home consistent with this method, including bags, tape, and gas-related equipment.

Some of the equipment used in the murder retrieved from the home. Photo Credit: Police.

Abdelshahed admitted to killing the children during the investigation, an admission prosecutors cited alongside forensic findings and other physical evidence.

During the pre-trial phase, he underwent an initial psychiatric screening under Sweden’s Section 7 procedure, which is used to determine whether a full forensic psychiatric evaluation is necessary. According to Dagens Juridik, the preliminary assessment raised concerns about his mental state, prompting authorities to order a comprehensive psychiatric examination.

That examination ultimately concluded that Abdelshahed did not suffer from a serious mental disorder of the kind that would justify sentencing him to compulsory psychiatric care rather than prison.

The indictment was formally filed on November 11, 2024, charging Abdelshahed with two counts of murder. One month later, the Södertälje District Court convicted him on both counts and sentenced him to life imprisonment and deportation in the event he was ever released. But Abdelshahed quickly appealed the verdict, arguing that the court should have imposed psychiatric care rather than a life sentence.

Paulus Said Foukaih Abdelshahed.

On February 27, 2025, the Svea Court of Appeal upheld the district court’s judgment in full. According to Omni’s summary of the appellate ruling, the court agreed that the murders were particularly ruthless and confirmed that the psychiatric evidence did not meet the legal threshold for diversion to psychiatric care.

But the case is now wrangling with its latest disturbing development. Last week, it was announced that Abdelshahed had been moved to a women’s prison after beginning to identify as transgender.

According to TV4 Nyheterna, Abdelshahed applied to change his legal sex marker to “female” last fall, and his application was granted. He also changed his legal name to “Lily.” Shortly after, he was moved to an unnamed women’s prison. The decision to transfer Abdelshahed had caused an uproar in Sweden, with many politicians coming out to condemn the decision and demand an explanation from prison officials.

In response to the backlash, Vilhelm Grevik, the acting head of Sweden’s Prison and Probation Service, issued a press release on the case.

“The Swedish Prison and Probation Service handles thousands of placements every year, a few of which involve an inmate changing his legal gender. We follow the Prison Act, where the main rule for the Swedish Prison and Probation Service is that legal gender determines institutional placement and that people of the opposite sex should not be placed together,” Grevik wrote.

Abdelshahed as “Lily”. Photo Credit: Nordfront.

Additional details from the hearings have also been released, indicating that Abdelshahed attempted to use his gender identity as a mitigating mental health factor during the trial. Abdelshahed suggested that he had trialled life as a “woman” sometime in 2023, but had stopped and spiraled into a volatile depressive episode as a result.

“If I had been born Lily, I would be happy and have my children. Live my life as it is,” Abdelshahed reportedly told investigators.

Although Abdelshahed was sentenced to life imprisonment, the court also ordered his deportation. In Sweden, a life sentence (livstids fängelse) means imprisonment for an indefinite period with no fixed release date. After serving at least 10 years, however, a prisoner may apply to have a life sentence converted into a fixed-term sentence, which can allow for release after additional time is served.

In Abdelshahed’s case, the deportation order stipulates that if he is ever granted a fixed-term sentence and released upon the conclusion of the time served, he is to be expelled from Sweden and banned from returning.

According to Expressen, the court requested an assessment from the Swedish Migration Agency regarding Abdelshahed’s safety in Egypt as a trans-identified male should he be deported. In its response, the agency stated that while living as a transgender person in Egypt can be difficult due to prevailing social attitudes, the conditions were not considered severe enough to constitute a legal obstacle to the deportation order.

reduxx

The British State Needs WWIII to Stave Off Civil War

By J.B. Shurk

Oliver JJ Lane, a writer and editor for Breitbart London, writes frequently about the growing censorship regime in the U.K., the public’s distrust of both institutional government and Establishment politicians of all labels, the official cover-up of Muslim “grooming” gangs that target and rape British children, and the increasing backlash of native Britons against a ruling class that prioritizes “multiculturalism” and “diversity” over everything else.  A running theme of his articles is that the U.K. is headed for civil war.

Last summer, Lane wrote a piece with this provocative headline: “Britain Preparing for Civil War but Uses Russian Threat As Political Cover, Says London Academic.”  In the piece, he takes direct aim at the U.K. government’s 2025 National Security Strategy.  That document argues that dangerous threats from Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran mean “we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat.”  Citing the need to protect “critical national infrastructure” from foreign enemies who might soon invade the British Isles, the strategy includes plans to reconstitute a “Home Defense” force capable of preventing domestic “sabotage during a crisis” and protecting the country from “enemy states and terrorists.” 

In response to the government’s warning of imminent foreign invasion, Lane drew readers’ attention to comments from Professor David Betz, an academic specializing in war studies, who called the National Security Strategy “logically absurd.”  In remarks intended to refute the U.K. government’s “Russia, Russia, Russia” narrative, Betz argued that internal threats to the country are much more significant than any threats coming from foreign powers thousands of miles away.  

Describing British society as “low trust, highly fractured, and highly politically factionalized,” Betz warned that “civil conflict” is “increasingly inevitable.”  Then Betz directly accused U.K. authorities of hiding the true intentions behind their overhaul of domestic security forces: “What they’re concerned about is domestic conflict … but that’s completely politically toxic for them to say so publicly, hence the convenience of saying, ‘We need to develop … a citizen’s militia for the protection of critical infrastructure.’  To say that we’re doing this against the potential of Russian attack … is convenient as a pretext.”

By using Professor Betz’s arguments as a counterweight to the British government’s stated national security objectives, Lane deftly suggested to the reader an alternative interpretation of current events.  What if a heavily armed “Home Defense” force has nothing to do with expelling foreign troops, spies, and saboteurs?  What if the bellicose cries of generals and members of parliament have nothing to do with Russia and everything to do with subduing the civilian population?  What if all the polemical pundits who insist that British families must prepare to sacrifice everything (even their children!) for an impending WWIII are really just “playing their part” as propagandists eager to keep the population distracted, fearful, and in line?

Fast-forward to this week, and Lane has written another piece that sharply articulates the disconnect between the government officials preparing Britain for war and the ordinary Britons who will be expected to do the fighting.  With talk of military conscription filling the airwaves and a glut of hyperventilating government officials assuring citizens that war with Russia has already begun, Lane notes “the reality that many young Britons feel the government has actively sabotaged their interests and are wondering why they ought to risk their lives for such a state.”  

While Establishment saber-rattlers speak nostalgically of the heroism and self-sacrifice of those Britons who fought and struggled through WWI and WWII, Lane addresses the elephant in the room: a century of “ever-larger welfare” handouts and a multigenerational demographic replacement that will soon render “ethnic Britons” a “minority” in their geographical homeland have transformed British society into something weaker, less unified, less patriotic, and much less capable of self-sacrifice and self-defense.  Many young people, Lane concludes, no longer believe that “fighting for the government is synonymous with fighting for their own interests.”

Although reasonable observers of current events have reached similar conclusions around the West, Lane makes an interesting observation: With increasing frequency, mainstream corporate news institutions are sounding the alarm concerning the public’s lack of interest in fighting and dying in wars instigated and promoted by ruling globalist elites.  

He points to a recent article in The Daily Telegraph entitled “Patriots Should Not Fight for the British State,” in which the author argues, “The nation has changed almost beyond recognition since we were last called upon to mobilize and fight a global war.  We are no longer one people, but numerous parallel societies with little to no connection to one another.  Presiding over this is an incompetent bureaucracy wedded to universalist ideas and chiefly concerned with its own survival.”

Lane highlights the argument from another op-ed in The Times in which that author correctly observes that “defending one’s homeland is a question of societal mass mobilization … in the sense of a shared belief in the nation and the culture that is at stake, an awareness that it is at risk and a commitment to defend it.  Without a united population it is difficult to make the trade-offs necessary to transform Britain and its European allies into thoroughly indigestible military targets for our enemies.”  

It is as if corporate news institutions are finally awakening to this reality: When you actively destroy national unity, shared history, tradition, and cultural heritage by importing foreigners on an industrial scale, you also destroy national identity.  Young British lads have no interest in fighting and dying for “multiculturalism.”  British parents have no interest in sacrificing their children for “diversity.”  No sane country is interested in sacrificing everything in order to preserve costly “climate change” regulations and safeguard the criminalization of so-called “hate speech.”  No patriot charges up a hill to raise an Antifa or LGBT flag in defense of censorship, government bullying, demographic replacement, and mass surveillance.

Establishment voices in the U.K. are not handling the domestic pushback well.  Lane quotes retired infantry officer Major Robert Lyman: “You folk are so obsessed with what you expect the State to do without once thinking about what you can do for the State. … Blaming the State for everything you don’t like is utter narcissism and is the most deplorable of all human behaviors.  Stop being utter namby-pambies and get a grip!  If war comes, you know that you’ll be lined up in uniform with the rest of us!”  

As Lane insightfully observes, what’s unintentionally revealing about Lyman’s bitter reaction is his insistence that young people fight for “the State.”  The military veteran seems to understand that in “multicultural” Britain, there is no country or nation left to defend.  Those sent to die in the meat-grinder of WWIII will do so in defense of the government’s clunky and corrupt bureaucratic machinery.  Without a common culture to protect or a historic people claiming Britain as home, there is nothing left in the U.K. to preserve…except Big Brother and his boot-stamping State.

According to Lane, another retired military officer, Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, has responded to Britons’ general disinterest in WWIII by arguing that anyone who doesn’t want to fight for the government should be expelled from the United Kingdom.  He also says that welfare programs must be cut to pay for war.  In other words, after importing tens of millions of foreigners to take the jobs of native Britons, the military Establishment is giving unhappy and unrepresented Britons a choice: leave your homeland or die for “the State.”  

When Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton recently claimed that “more families will know what sacrifice for our nation means,” this is what he had in mind.  No wonder common Brits have little interest in WWIII.  Send the “elites” to war instead!

americanthinker

U.S. Sanctions Starmer-Linked ‘Radical Activist’ NGO Boss at Centre of Censorship Scandal Against Breitbart

Secretary Marco Rubio holds a press availability in Brussels, Belgium, April 4, 2025. (Official State Department photo by Freddie Everett)

Five UK and Euro agents of the “global censorship-industrial complex” who “led organized efforts to coerce” the suppression of American viewpoints have been sanctioned by the U.S. government and are barred from entering the country, the State Department announced.

Imran Ahmed, a British citizen and the founder and CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), the notorious censorship and deplatforming outfit which defined its central mission as “Kill Musk’s Twitter” and is closely linked to the inner circle of British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, has been sanctioned by the United States government.

The CCDH, a homologue of America’s Sleeping Giants censorship campaign group, proclaims its mission as thus: “We expose the producers and spreaders of hate and disinformation, and demonstrate the offline consequences.”

In 2020 the CCDH pressured Google to ban conservative publishers, including Breitbart, and in 2021 was at the centre of a Covid-era plot to smear Breitbart News and other publications in a bid to see them blacklisted from social media. A House Judiciary Committee investigation into the CCDH’s collusion with the Biden government and social media companies to censor the internet saw the NGO subpoenaed in 2023.

More recently, the CCDH has been revealed to have been a creation of the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney, who is alleged to have organised a clandestine astroturf censorship campaign targeting political rivals and outlets like Breitbart News.

Under the terms of the order imposed by the U.S. State Department, CCDH CEO Ahmed is banned from entering the country, and can be deported if present. “Certain family members may also be covered by these restrictions”, the State Department added.

Addressing the CCDH, U.S. Undersecretary of State Sarah B Rogers said on Tuesday that the sanctions target “the censorship-NGO ecosystem” and said that Ahmed was a “key collaborator with the Biden Administration’s effort to weaponize the government against U.S. citizens.”

She said: “Ahmed’s group, Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), created the infamous “disinformation dozen” report, which called for platforms to deplatform twelve American “anti-vaxxers”, including now-HHS Secretary [Kennedy].”

Noting destroying Twitter after it was acquired by Elon Musk and weaponising British and European law to attack U.S. social media platforms were cited as priorities by Ahmed’s CCDH in internal documents, Rogers said Ahmed’s organisation works to “expand censorship in Europe and around the world”.

Rogers cited earlier remarks when she outlined the U.S. government’s determination to protect the First Amendment from foreign interference. She had told British news network GB News on December 4th that foreigners trying to censor Americans was a “red line”.

She said then: “applying [Britain’s Online Safety Act] to speech that has nothing to do with Britain, does not occur in Britain, is on American platforms by American users on American political issues, purporting to censor Americans in America is a dealbreaker. It is a non-starter, it is a red line”.

Overnight, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement the new sanctions were made against “radical activists and weaponized NGOs… agents of the global censorship-industrial complex” who had ” led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetize, and suppress American viewpoints they oppose. These radical activists and weaponized NGOs have advanced censorship crackdowns by foreign states—in each case targeting American speakers and American companies.”

As earlier reported, reflexive censorship, viewpoint suppression, and deplatforming became an integral part of the British government with the coming of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who tapped as his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, the British political organiser central to the nexus of newly-made bodies such as the CCDH and Stop Funding Fake News (SFFN).

Revelations claimed by South African investigative journalist Paul Holden, citing “a trove of documents that expose the operation”, state McSweeney’s allegedly funded Labour Together ‘think tank’ created these lobbying NGOs disguised as astroturfed grassroots campaigns to push censorship. Holden asserted:

McSweeney and his allies blew up British politics, with a blast radius that extended across the pond to the United States… to launch an astroturf campaign that mounted a ferocious attack on non-conformist media and free speech on both sides of the Atlantic.

The campaign was catalyzed by a desire to demonetize and delegitimize outlets who reported sympathetically on factional opponents of McSweeney and his allies… That campaign directly sought to “cancel” outlets reporting favorably on Nigel Farage and the Brexit Party.

It also made several ad-hominem attacks on U.S. President Donald Trump personally and sought to ensure that Breitbart was barred from receiving any advertising at all from the UK’s Cabinet office. This was all conducted behind a veil of misdirection and secrecy.

Holden states that efforts have allegedly been made to cover up McSweeney’s role in funding and creating the CCDH and SFFN, but that, nevertheless, this “most powerful unelected official in British politics” organised a carefully concealed foreign influence operation to control the U.S. media landscape.

Beyond Ahmed, four other figures in the UK and Europe were sanctioned, including the European Union’s infamous Censorship Tsar Thierry Breton, who crashed out of the bloc after going toe-to-toe with Elon Musk and losing. Nevertheless, his European Digital Services Act remains a major force in global censorship.

Global Disinformation Index (GDI) boss Clare Melford was sanctioned, with Under Secretary Rogers noting the GDI purports to fight “hate speech” and “disinformation” but actually uses “taxpayer money to exhort censorship and blacklisting of American speech and press”. Also subjected to sanctions were Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon, the leaders of Germany’s HateAid, which “counters conservative groups” and is a censor that works for the European Union.

Ironically, the HateAid bosses responded to the announcement by accusing the U.S. government of “trying to silence its critics by any means necessary”.

breitbart

Christendom Rising: A Path for Hope

Detail of Adoration of the Magi (circa 1420), a 115 × 170–183 cm tempera on wood panel by Lorenzo Monaco (1370-circa 1425), located in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo Monaco, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

This December 25th, only a minority of Europeans will get themselves to church to acknowledge the meaning of the day. Among Christian celebrations, Christmas alone remains alive in the modern Western imagination. There is one reason for that: stuff. 

At Christmas, people get stuff. A society based upon materialism and commodification, a society that has transposed our innate longing for the infinite onto the finite, will still celebrate a Christian feast day if it can be reframed as a chance to get more stuff.

But fortunately there are people all around the world who still know the true meaning of Christmas. They will wake up and get themselves to church, knowing that on the way to their worship, they may be stoned to death; or they may be hacked to pieces in the street with machetes; or on arrival at the church, be blown to smithereens by a carefully placed bomb. I refer to the Christians of Egypt, of Nigeria, of Pakistan, and many other countries around the globe. 

Open Doors, a non-denominational organisation that supports persecuted Christians around the world, has recorded that in the past year 7,679 churches and Christian properties were burned down or seriously damaged, 4,744 people were imprisoned for their Christianity, and 4,476 Christians were killed for their faith. Most of us in the West, on the other hand, cannot even be bothered to attend the Christmas Day service down the road. 

Besides Jordan—a country that’s only existed for eighty years—there is not a single example of an Islamic state that does not persecute Christians. This is a significant fact, as an Islamic ascendency in Europe could entail that the old continent will find itself under Islamic rule in the not-too-distant future. What that could mean for European Christians is worth considering.

It may be the hostility towards Christians that’s observable across the world which explains the deep sympathy for Islam harboured by our secular overlords—perhaps they see Islam as an essential means for exorcising Europe of its Christianity. But our elites are growing anxious. They’re worried that Christianity may be returning, despite all their labours to undermine it and quash it. Their latest tactic has been interesting: they claim that the political ‘Right’ is cynically appropriating Christianity for ‘divisive’ purposes. Signs of a Christian reawakening, they say, are nothing but a veiled fascism masquerading as piety.

But what if a significant population really came to believe that their civilisation could not survive without reversion to the Christian faith?

Those allegedly guilty of ‘politicising Christianity’ are in fact only acknowledging that Christianity is already inherently political. After all, Christianity calls for the nations to be discipled (Matthew 28:19); it teaches that there is no earthly power other than that which is bestowed from above (John 19:11); that every knee must bow at the name of Jesus, in heaven, on earth, and under the earth (Philippians 2:10); and Christianity looks forward to the resurrection of the dead, when all the earth’s nations will gather before the Lamb (Apocalypse 7:9). Whatever your local pastor might tell you, Christianity is already political. 

Many are waking up to the fact that decades of atheism, secularism, progressivism, and materialism have made us weak and effeminate. Either Europe will rediscover the spirit of Charles Martel and of St. Boniface, whom Martel supported and protected, or it will fall. As the great English historian Christopher Dawson, some time at the midpoint of the last century, wrote:

No civilisation, not even that of ancient Greece, has ever undergone such a continuous and profound process of change as Western Europe has done during the last 900 years. … The principle of change has been a spiritual one and the progress of Western civilisation is intimately related to the dynamic ethos of Western Christianity.

Every one of the half a million church spires and towers across Europe testify to the fact that the Faith is the soul of our civilisation. And if Dawson is correct in what he writes above, then either Christianity is political—in the sense of animating and informing the polities it permeates—or it is not political anymore, in which case it had better get political again, for the alternative is the end of our civilisation.

It is worth meditating on the role of the Magi. Those wise men from the East, who were likely astrologer-priests of Zoroastrianism from Persia, have come to symbolise the nations in the Christian imagination. 

The Magi have come to represent all the peoples of the earth, who must humble themselves and prostrate themselves before the Lord, and ultimately become discipled. The nations of the West are no exception. If they have abandoned the Lord in some damnable spasm of hysterical apostasy, then they must repent and return to Him. And if atheists and progressives despair at the thought of such a conversion of the nations, then we should be all the more pleased at the first signs of it.

Europe must become Christendom again. We have no other choice, but it’s a merry one. A bright star is in the sky, all we must do is follow it. 

europeanconservative

FRANCE: The Two Top Players In A Women’s Elite Basketball League Are Both Male

Two trans-identified males are dominating a top women’s basketball league in France, outranking every female player in the league this season. Julie “Jimmy” Tétart, 33, and Aurore Pautou, 43, rank first and second respectively in Ligue Féminine 2 (LF2) this season based on evaluation statistics.

LF2 is France’s second-highest level of women’s basketball, sitting just below the top tier, Ligue Féminine de Basketball. Playing for teams in Monaco and Grenoble, Tétart and Pautou currently outrank every female player in overall statistical efficiency.

Despite being older than most of his much younger female peers, Tétart leads the field with an average of 35.5 evaluation points per game. Though Pautou trails a good distance behind with 22.2, he still ranks just above the top-ranked female player, Inès Nezerwa, who has 19.9 points.

Tétart formerly played for the ESC Tergnier male team prior to declaring a transgender identity. Last year, he rejoined the sport as a “woman.”

In an interview with RMC Sport, Tétart described his performance as his “reward” for having gone through a number of cosmetic “gender affirming” surgeries, including a vocal cord surgery that significantly reduced his lung capacity.

“When I came back, I was told ‘you have basketball skills but physically you’re out of shape and you don’t know how to play.’ I stopped for several years and I had to work a lot,” he told the French sports news outlet, boasting of improvements to his athletic prowess.

“It’s not my goal to be a symbol, but if I can help, all the better,” Tétart said. “My Instagram is still public, by the way. Back then, I would have liked to be able to talk to someone, to have a point of reference regarding trans identity. I know I’m putting myself out there by speaking out, but I prefer to take the time and energy to explain what it’s like and, I hope, to be able to have peace of mind for the rest of my short career.”

Unlike Tétart, Pautou does not frequently speak about his transgender identity, but claimed the title of the “first trans woman to become a professional basketball player” in 2021. Pautou had stepped away from basketball for a period of time, but rejoined after playing against “senior women” at a local gym.

“While I never thought I’d be able to play again, one evening in October 2019, something clicked,” he said. “A little online research later, I went to a gym near my home where senior women were training. I asked the coach if I could play on a hoop, and well… I can’t even describe the feeling… pure joy.”

Since coming back to basketball, he has won multiple titles in 3 v. 3 tournaments and, at the end of the last Division 2 season in 2024-25, he was ranked as the top player overall.

Both men have complained about “transphobia” in the sport, with Tétart lamenting about a lack of support from spectators and action by referees.

“Unfortunately, nothing happens. They pretend they don’t hear or see anything and play as if nothing’s wrong. It’s new, unprecedented, we’re not used to it, but the comments are degrading and humiliating.” Tétart suggested that there should be sanctions against fans, like there currently are for those who hurl racist abuse at players in other sporting leagues.

Likely due to his ability to help his team dominate the season, some of Tétart’s colleagues have backed him publicly. But others have expressed disapproval of his decision to play in a female league.

One coach from another team noted that there was a “clear difference in physical ability” between Tétart and female players. The coach said that while all people should “have the freedom to be who they want … one person’s freedom ends where another’s begins.” The coach continued by noting that female players were “working” in the professional leagues, and that their ability to earn professional contracts was challenged by being forced to compete against men.

Current French Basketball Federation (FFBB) policies allow males to play on women’s teams providing they have legally changed their sex, but recent reports indicate they are “reviewing the issue very seriously” after backlash from female players. Tétart had stated that if the rules were to change and he was prevented from playing against women, he would look to switch to a foreign league.

The news of Pautou and Tétart’s participation in women’s basketball was brought to light by women’s sports advocacy group HeCheated.org, which took to social media to condemn the trans activists who often deny that trans-identified males are taking opportunities from women in sports.

“This is just another reminder to [trans rights activists], just because you don’t know about them, it doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Men are physiologically different than women. When they are allowed to compete against women, even if you don’t about it, they are almost guaranteed to be at the top somewhere,” the group wrote in a tweet published on December 19.

According to a 2024 United Nations report, almost 900 athletic medals have been taken from girls and women by “trans-identifying” males competing in female categories.

The 20-page report reviewed “violence against women and girls in sports,” adding that more than 600 biologically female athletes have lost at least 890 medals to transgender competitors. These defeats occurred in over 400 competitions in 29 sports.

“Male athletes have specific attributes considered advantageous in certain sports, such as strength and testosterone levels which are higher than the average range for females even before puberty, thereby resulting in the loss of fair opportunity,” the report reads. “To avoid the loss of a fair opportunity, males must not compete in the female categories of sport.”

Despite the shocking review, trans activists continue to deny that allowing males to self-identify into women’s sports puts female athletes at any disadvantage.

reduxx

Belgium’s ‘population replacement’: 72.9% of children and teens in Brussels have a non-EU migration background, only 10.5% are Belgians of Belgian origin

AI generator

The demographic changes across Europe are immense, with ethnic, indigenous Europeans rapidly being replaced. As Remix News has noted, this is apparent in cities like Vienna, Austria, but perhaps some of the most stark developments are taking place in Brussels, Belgium.

The data there shows that in Brussels, 72.9 percent of children and youth aged 0-17 have a migration background from outside the European Union or were born outside the EU, according to StatBel, the official government statistic organization.

Remarkably, only 10.56 percent in this age group are Belgians of exclusively Belgian origin.

In response, Belgian MP Filip Dewinter has referred to “population replacement,” which he argues is not a “conspiracy,” but clearly demonstrated by the data.

Many critics have stated that Brussels had such a high percentage of foreign youths because citizens from other EU nations had moved to the capital. However, the data shows that nearly all the youth in the capital city now belong to non-EU nations.

Overall in Belgium, there are remarkable differences between the regions. StatBel notes, “At the Belgian level, approximately two-thirds of the population was Belgian of Belgian origin as of Jan. 1, 2025. This varies from 22.0 percent in the Brussels-Capital Region to 63.6 percent in the Walloon Region, and 71.9 percent in the Flemish Region.”

In Belgium as a whole, 64 percent are of Belgian origin, 22.1 percent are Belgian of foreign origin, and 13.8 percent are foreigners with no Belgian citizenship.

In practice, this means that as of Jan. 1, 2025, the “Belgian population numbered in absolute figures 7,571,338 Belgians of Belgian origin, 2,619,289 Belgians of foreign origin and 1,634,924 non-Belgians,” according to BelStat.

Belgium clearly indicates that there are many Belgians of “foreign origin” in Brussels overall as well, amounting to 40.8 percent in the Brussels-Capital Region.

That means in Brussels, 78 percent of the population is of non-Belgian origin.

Family reunification is driving much of the immigration, and remains the largest channel of growth.

Since 2018, the annual average has fluctuated around 56,000 new family reunifications. The sole dip was seen in 2020, during the coronavirus pandemic. The peak was in 2024, with 59,873 family reunifications.

Great Replacement

In a new column in Liberium, Filip Dewinter, a leading member of the right-wing Flemish nationalist party Vlaams Belang and currently Belgium’s longest-serving member of parliament, referred to a new 33-page Trump administration memo related to Europe. Among other issues, the memo cited that Europe’s demographics are changing and that this development could represent a threat to the United States. Dewinter wrote this:

Isn’t Trump simply right when he asserts that Europe is in decline, weakly led, and losing its identity, social cohesion, cultural identity, and ethnic homogeneity due to immigration, wokeism, and Islamization? In the 33-page memo—of which, incidentally, only two pages are about Europe—the Trump administration refers to ‘migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating strife.’

This supports the obvious assertion that the native European population is being replaced. By linking the immigration invasion to “cratering birthdates” and “the loss of national identities and self-confidence,” Trump fully endorses the population replacement analysis, and the concept of “population replacement” has evolved from “conspiracy theory” to American government policy.

Last year, Belgian MEP Tom Vandendriessche was reprimanded by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola for concluding that EU Commissioner Ylva Johansson’s call for more migration to combat Europe’s aging workforce amounts to “deliberate, organized repopulation.”

The lawmaker for the Flemish nationalist Vlaams Belang party, which sits with the Identity & Democracy group in the European Parliament, commented on the remarks by Johansson, the EU’s commissioner for home affairs, who said last month that the European Union needs at least 1 million migrants every year to replenish its depleting labor force and called for the bloc to further “invest in legal channels for regular migration.”

“These are Commissioner Johansson’s literal words: ‘We need migration,’” Vandendriessche said of the comments on Jan. 16.

“She wants to bring an additional 1 million migrants to Europe, on top of the many millions we already have.

“In doing so, she wants to combat the aging of Europe’s shrinking population. So she literally wants non-European peoples to replace shrinking European peoples.

“That is, by definition, replacement migration, a synonym for repopulation,” the Belgian MEP added.

rmx

France probes antisemitic attack on Jewish child at Paris airport

The perpetrator

French authorities have launched an investigation after a disturbing video surfaced showing a man harassing a young Jewish boy at Paris’ Charles de Gaulle Airport, ordering him to “free Palestine” and “dance,” according to a judicial source quoted by AFP on Tuesday.

Paris police chief Patrice Faure condemned the “unacceptable and intolerable remarks,” declaring on X that they “will not go unpunished.”

Faure confirmed that an investigation was underway to identify the suspect and bring him to justice. “We express our support for our Jewish compatriots and assure them of our full commitment to combating antisemitic acts,” he added, posting an image from the footage.

The Bobigny public prosecutor’s office said an investigation had been opened into “violence committed on the grounds of race, ethnicity, nationality or religion.”

The video, posted Sunday by the SwordOfSalomon account on X, has been viewed over 440,000 times. It reportedly shows a man approaching a Jewish boy – his face pixelated – as he plays a video game in the airport. The assailant takes the child’s toy and says in English, “Are you gonna free Palestine, bro? If you don’t free them, I’ll snatch your hat off, bro,” referring to the boy’s kippah.

The man then taunts the child in broken French, repeatedly saying “dance, cachou” – apparently a mispronunciation of cochon (“pig”) – as the confused boy dances nervously. The account that posted the footage claimed that the man targeted two Jewish children, including a seven-year-old.

Jewish organizations have reported a sharp rise in antisemitic attacks in France following Hamas’ October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel, and the ensuing war in Gaza.

Yonathan Arfi, president of CRIF – the umbrella body of French Jewish institutions – called the airport incident “yet another illustration of the climate of antisemitism that has prevailed in Europe” since those attacks. He said he was struck by “the unbridled, uninhibited nature of the antisemitism.”

israelnationalnews