Famous Croatian nun stabbed in possible religiously motivated attack – Perpetrator was a migrant who shouted “Allahu akbar” during the attack

A Catholic religious sister in Croatia was hospitalized on Friday afternoon after being stabbed in a residential district of Zagreb, the nation’s capital, in what early reports suggest may have been a religiously motivated attack.

Police have launched a criminal investigation, while Church sources, journalists, and hospital officials reportedly confirm that the sister is recovering and no longer in danger of losing her life.

The attack occurred on November 28 in the Malešnica neighborhood. The sister, who belongs to a Zagreb-based religious community, was struck in the abdomen with a sharp object, multiple times, before returning briefly to her convent and then being taken for emergency treatment at the Sisters of Charity University Hospital Centre.

Medical personnel notified police due to the nature of the wound, and officers later confirmed to local media that they had received a report of an injured woman and were “determining all circumstances of the incident.”

According to unofficial but widely reported information, the perpetrator was a migrant who shouted “Allahu akbar” during the attack. Croatian journalist Marin Vlahović was the first to publish details of the stabbing, writing that a “nun had been attacked with a knife in Zagreb” and that his trusted source confirmed the assailant was “allegedly a migrant” shouting “religious” slogans.

Vlahović later clarified that the sister was out of danger and said he wished to inform the public, “not raise tensions.”

The hospital confirmed that the sister arrived around 3 p.m. with “an injury inflicted by a sharp object in the area of the abdominal wall,” and that she was accompanied by a known person. Doctors emphasized she was not in life-threatening condition but required further evaluation and treatment. Police have not yet confirmed a motive, though sources cited by the Catholic Information Agency (IKA) said investigators are examining whether the attack contained “elements of religious or ideological motivation.”

Only later was the victim publicly identified as Sister Marija Tatjana Zrno, 34, a member of the Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent de Paul, originally from Šujica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. She resides in the congregation’s Zagreb monastery on Frankopanska Street and teaches religion at a local elementary school. Those who know her describe her as cheerful, joyous, and deeply Marian in spiritual devotion.

Sister Marija Tatjana is known throughout Croatia for her lifelong love of soccer, which she has always lived “openly and with a smile.”

Having made appearances on Laudato TV, she hosted soccer-related programs and quickly won viewer affection. She has previously explained that sport never conflicted with her vocation but instead helped her reach people: “a way of connecting people, joy, and evangelization.”

Her enthusiasm for initiatives combining faith and soccer once caught international attention. ACI Prensa and Catholic News Agency published an interview in which she drew parallels between sport and the spiritual life: “To be a successful football player, you have to train every day. It’s the same with spirituality: if you’re not persistent and don’t pray regularly, you’ll become lazy, lukewarm, and your life won’t bear fruit.”

A big fan of Croatian Ballon d’Or winner Luka Modrić, whom she has praised for wearing shin pads with images of Jesus, she organized the “Rosary for the Fire” prayer initiative for the Croatian national team during the World Cup alongside Fr. Ivan Dominik Iličić. This effort involved “young and old people from all over Croatia” and even included the grandmother of player Ivan Perišić.

She personally informed coach Zlatko Dalić about the initiative, which she said the team welcomed warmly. She praised Croatian players for consoling defeated opponents, saying that such gestures show “the progress of humanity.”

As the police investigation continues, Croatian Catholic media have urged prayers for Sr. Marija Tatjana’s full recovery.

lifesitenews

Spain Boils Over: Giant Crowds Rise Up Against the Socialists

Screen grab youtube

The demonstrations held this Sunday, November 30th, in the capital and in more than 20 Spanish cities revealed growing social pressure on Pedro Sánchez’s government.

The protests called by the Partido Popular (PP) and Revuelta—the fast-rising conservative youth organisation of Generation Z— were joined by self-employed workers after nationwide mobilisations. Outraged by rising fees and taxes, the demonstrators denounce a fiscal burden that has reached historic highs. Spain is thus entering a climate of dissent that is no longer sector-specific, but fully transversal.

In Madrid, thousands gathered outside the headquarters of governing socialist party PSOE in a protest led by Revuelta, demanding answers as corruption cases continue to close in on the president’s inner circle. The organisation has successfully channelled Gen Z’s political frustration through a message centred on democratic renewal, transparency, and the defence of fundamental freedoms. Their argument is straightforward: if all of the president’s closest allies are implicated in alleged criminal schemes, it is increasingly difficult to claim he knew nothing about an operation that ran for years.

The recent imprisonment of José Luis Ábalos and Koldo García, together with the investigation into Santos Cerdán and the judicial fronts involving the prime minister’s wife and brother, have triggered a national debate: how can the president continue to plead ignorance when all his key associates are under investigation, charged, or already behind bars?

Adding fuel to the political crisis, self-employed workers held demonstrations over the weekend in Barcelona, Valencia, Seville, Bilbao, Málaga, and Zaragoza to protest the continuous rise in social security quotas, taxes, and municipal fees that has pushed many to the brink. The new fiscal burdens—especially those expected for 2025—place Spain among the European countries with the highest burdens on small businesses and freelancers.

Sector federations describe the situation as “the worst in two decades” and warn that thousands of self-employed workers are now at risk of shutting down. Discontent has also spread among liberal professionals, transport workers, and small retailers, adding an economic dimension to the political protests at a moment of maximum vulnerability for the government.

With their inclusion, the map of demonstrations takes on a different texture. This is no longer an ideological dispute, but a broad rejection of policies widely perceived as suffocating for ordinary citizens.

The convergence of political, youth, and economic protests shows a level of social wear on the government unseen since the 2010 crisis. The combination of corruption scandals and rising fiscal pressure is creating a volatile climate that could have direct consequences for parliamentary stability and the approaching electoral cycle.

europeanconservative

Pro-Palestinian Activists Raid La Stampa: Press Freedom Debate Erupts in Italy

Screen grab youtube

A fierce debate over press freedom has erupted in Italy after the newsroom of La Stampa was raided, occupied, and vandalised by left-wing, pro-Palestinian activists.

The assault took place on Friday in Turin, home to the national headquarters of La Stampa, one of Italy’s oldest newspapers.

It came amid a nationwide strike called by several unions to protest the government’s 2026 budget—dubbed a “war budget” for its cuts to public services and increased military spending.

Several dozen demonstrators broke away from the march to target La Stampa, which was empty as journalists were participating in the strike. Protesters were reacting to coverage of a recent expulsion order against Mohamed Shahin, a local imam accused of ties to Hamas, whom they claimed had been unfairly stigmatised by the media.

The demonstrators hurled bags of manure at the gates, sprayed graffiti, and forced open a side entrance. Inside the newsroom, desks were overturned, equipment damaged, and threatening messages—including pro-Palestinian slogans—scrawled across the walls.

While months of pro-Palestinian protests had seen activists accuse the Italian press of downplaying or ignoring Israel’s actions, the violence at La Stampa marked an unprecedented escalation.

The attack has intensified long-standing tensions between the right-wing government and the opposition, highlighting tensions between Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Elly Schlein, leader of the Democratic Party.

While critics accuse Meloni of undermining press independence, the government points to violent groups and their institutional backers on the Left as the real threat, claiming they label attacks as “fascist” to tie them to the Right and draw international attention.

In her first comment on the assault, Meloni wrote on X: “One does not downplay or reverse the facts. Anyone attempting to rewrite reality to lessen the severity of what happened is making a dangerous mistake. Press freedom is a pillar of our democracy and must always be defended without ambiguity.”

Her remarks were aimed at left-wing politicians and media outlets that described the attack as “fascist”, framing it as a right-wing act while overlooking its left-wing and pro-Palestinian nature.

These actors have long linked threats against journalists to a climate of tension in Italy, blaming government pressure on the media—including attempts to influence RAI, the public broadcaster, often dubbed “TeleMeloni”— as part of a broader effort to control public reporting and curb press independence.

Schlein has repeatedly warned that press freedom is at risk, citing attacks on journalists and a hostile climate toward the media.

At the Congress of the Party of European Socialists in Amsterdam last October, she referenced the attack on journalist Sigfrido Ranucci—for which no far-right link has been found—and said: “Democracy and press freedom are at risk when the extreme right is in government,” framing the incident within a broader hostile environment under Meloni.

Amid the fallout, Fratelli d’Italia, Meloni’s party, invited Schlein to the upcoming Atreju festival, an annual youth-focused political event organised by the party, for a public debate with Meloni and other opposition leaders.

Schlein has not yet confirmed whether she will attend.

brusselssignal

UK: Migrant responsible for killing 269 people in deadly bombings wins appeal after being refused asylum

2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. Screen grab youtube

A Sri Lankan national who faced arrest in connection with the devastating 2019 Easter bombings has succeeded in his appeal against the Home Office’s rejection of his asylum claim.

The man, identified solely as ‘YA’, secured victory at the immigration Upper Tribunal in Birmingham after challenging the initial decision.

The Islamic State-claimed attacks in Sri Lanka resulted in 269 deaths, with British nationals among the victims.

Following the Upper Tribunal’s intervention, the case must now undergo a fresh hearing.

The asylum seeker had contested the fairness of the original proceedings, leading to the tribunal’s examination of potential procedural flaws.

The man entered the UK in 2022 alongside his spouse, both asserting they had faced persecution in their homeland.

Prior to his departure from Sri Lanka, authorities had detained him regarding the coordinated Easter Sunday attacks, which struck churches and hotels across the island nation in April 2019.

The bombings represented one of the deadliest terror incidents in Sri Lankan history.

Despite the couple’s claims of persecution, the Home Office initially determined that YA did not qualify for asylum protection in Britain.

But Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Claire Burns identified multiple legal errors in the initial determination, notably the failure to consider evidence of YA’s release on bail after his arrest warrant.

The asylum seeker had alleged judicial bias in the earlier proceedings, though Judge Burns rejected claims that previous judges were “highly prejudiced” against him.

Judge Burns determined that the errors warranted setting aside the entire ruling, necessitating a comprehensive re-examination of YA’s case.

The judge’s ruling mandated a complete fresh examination of the asylum claim.

Judge Burns said: “I find there will need to be a complete rehearing wherein the Judge will make findings about the credibility of [YA’s] account and given the nature and extent of the fact finding the appeal should therefore be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal.

She added: “I determine that no facts should be preserved.

“This will enable the new Tribunal to make a full assessment on the credibility of [YA’s] account on full consideration of the oral and documentary evidence.”

The date for the new hearing has yet to be scheduled.

gbnews

At the Christmas market in Berlin, a Palestinian stall is selling products that promote the destruction of Israel. The city authorities think this is OK

Illustration. AI generator

A Palestinian stall at the Christmas market: what was once unthinkable is now reality. On Berlin’s Alexanderplatz, such a stall is causing discontent. At first glance, the goods on offer seem unremarkable: crockery, cloths, caps, earrings, bracelets and necklaces. But on closer look, it becomes clear why the stall is now the subject of criticism.

Numerous products feature the melon symbol, which is used by Palestinians as a distinguishing mark. Many items also bear Arabic lettering. Particularly controversial, however, is a necklace that shows the outline of a Palestinian country. The problem is that the area depicted also includes the territory of Israel.

When asked by German newspaper Bild, the salesperson explained in English that the necklace represented the territory of Palestine and that Israel did not exist for him. His boss also shared this view. She told the Bild journalist that she came from Palestine, which is why her products were related to Palestine. She then allegedly began filming the reporter and threatening to call the police.

According to the newspaper, the responsible district office stated that it had no influence on the specific assortment of stalls and goods. The overall organiser of the Christmas market was responsible for this.
The Berlin police stated that merely denying the state of Israel or its right to exist, without any reference to banned organisations such as Hamas or Samidoun, did not constitute a criminal offence. In such cases, only the public order office could intervene within the framework of the trade regulations. However, this would only be possible if there were dangers to life, limb, health, public safety or order.

exxpress

UK: Disgraced Oxford Union President Who Celebrated Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Says He Just Wanted to Make People Laugh (VIDEO)

Ousted Oxford Union President George Abaraonye on LBC.

The student who was ousted as the president of the prestigious Oxford Union after celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk says he just wanted to make people laugh.

After news broke that Kirk had been fatally shot by a lunatic leftist during an event at Utah Valley University back in September, George Abaraonye wrote: “Let’s fucking go.”

In an interview with the British radio station LBC, Abaraonye did his best to salvage whatever is left of his reputation.

“[It was] a stupid and silly thing for me to say, I reacted to a notification and the headline. I had no context for, you know, what had happened.”

“I didn’t really understand the severity of the situation.”

When pressed by host Lewis Goodall about having personally met Charlie Kirk, Abaraonye blamed Kirk’s “polarizing” conservative ideology.

Mr Kirk’s comments don’t exist in a vacuum, you know.

He was an incredibly, kind of, polarizing figure and I think it’s almost a symptom of him and my reaction of kind of how we have discourse online, in which you know, it’s oftentimes about saying something almost inflammatory because I wanted to spark a conversation about kind of what had happened.

The fact that, oh my God, this is such a major event that has taken place. I wanted to get a reaction, I wanted to have a conversation.

Watch the clip below:

Goodall then suggested he just wanted to make people laugh.

“Almost exactly like a laugh and a bit of a reaction and kind of, I realized afterwards that you know that wasn’t the right way to about it.”

Abaraonye was removed as president of the Oxford Union last month after losing a vote of no-confidence.

During his campaign to win the vote, Abaraonye portrayed himself as a man fighting against the far-right.

“Today is your opportunity to affirm Free Speech, to stand against the racism of the Far Right, and to stand up for the principles the Union has championed for 200 years,” he said on the day of the vote.

“Two centuries later, the same people who claim to believe in the Union are now acting in stark opposition to the Union’s founding principles, by supporting a campaign of harassment, censorship, and abuse. We will not be silenced.”

However, Abaraonye’s unfortunately fell on deaf ears after his opponents reached the two-thirds majority in order to secure his removal.

thegatewaypundit

Antisemitism spirals out of control in once ‘Great’ Britain

The photo features a child holding a sign with the flag of Palestine and the words ‘Save Our Children!’ Twitter

By Andrea Widburg

For a week now, I’ve been meaning to write about raging antisemitism in once “Great” Britain, but those plans keep being interrupted, whether by delightful days when content from our wonderful volunteer writers fills the site or by American news that deserves more immediate attention. But today’s a very sleepy Sunday, the last day in a long holiday weekend, so I can finally clear my browser.

Britain has long had an up-and-down relationship with Jews. Jews began immigrating to England from France after the Norman Conquest in 1066. They were welcomed then because they were the only ones who could lend money in a time when usury was forbidden to Christians. Monarchs desperately needed the liquidity Jews provided.

The medieval era, however, also gave rise to the “blood libel” slanders. These were horrible false accusations against Jews, such as accusing them of using the blood of Christian children to make their matzo (an unleavened cracker which has as its only ingredients flour and water). If a disease came to town (and this was long before the Black Death), Jews were accused of poisoning the wells, even as the diseases took them, too. Monarchs who couldn’t pay off their debts used these canards to encourage massacres. Their motto was, if the creditor is slaughtered, the debt is erased.

One of the worst anti-Jewish massacres of the medieval era occurred in 1190, in the cathedral town of York. Two Jewish York residents earned the citizens’ wrath by daring to attend Richard I’s coronation. When a fire broke out in the city, York’s residents used the fire as an excuse to attack the two Jews’ home. They succeeded in slaughtering one of the coronation attendees and everyone else in the house, but the other attendee managed to escape to York Castle. The rest of York’s Jews soon followed him.

Eventually, 20-40 families were holed up in the castle. When the mob attacked, the Jews realized that they could not survive the assault. Therefore, they copied the pattern set at Masada so many centuries before: They all committed suicide rather than be torn apart by the mob. It’s estimated that about 150 people died in all.

One hundred years later, King Edward I banished all of England’s Jews to get parliament to approve a tax for him. When Shakespeare wrote The Merchant of Venice at the end of the 16th century, which became the template for how the British viewed Jews—cruel, avaricious, dishonest—it is very possible that he’d never actually met a Jew.

Jews finally returned to England in 1655, when Oliver Cromwell invited them back in. This was consistent with the Puritan allegiance to the Old Testament.

Upon the Restoration of the British Monarchy in 1661, Jews were treated much as other Dissenters (that is, sects that were not part of the official Church of England). They could not hold public office, work in the government, attend university, etc. However, for the most part, while viewed with disdain as the other, the British left them alone. By the 19th century, a Jewish convert—Benjamin Disraeli—became one of Great Britain’s most successful Prime Ministers.

The Biblical affinity for seeing Jews in the homeland was so strong that, in 1917, the British government, which now controlled the Holy Land, promised to establish a “national home for the Jewish people.” Unfortunately, Britain’s second-tier bureaucrats disliked that idea.

This state of affairs was still the norm when I lived in England in the early 1980s: The British didn’t particularly like the Jews who lived in the UK, but they weren’t actively hostile to them either. That falls in with my philosophy, which says that you don’t have to like me, but you don’t get to kill me.

However, beginning decades ago with a massive influx of Muslims from across the Indian subcontinent, Africa, and the Middle East, and accelerating with the hard left turn in the British government, things have changed. The UK is now one of the most virulently antisemitic nations in the Western world. I’ll stop my analysis now and just leave you with a few recent stories out of the UK:

Sir Michael Ellis has written an excellent summary about the aggressive antisemitism that is overtaking every single British institution:

  • The National Health Service has a growing problem with (mostly Muslim) healthcare providers discriminating against and abusing Jewish patients.
  • The BBC is antisemitic in every aspect of its operations, whether in the news it reports or its behind-the-scenes shenanigans (including working with terrorists for anti-Israel war “documentaries).
  • The police routinely ban Jews from the streets when Muslims are out protesting, saying that the Jews create a hazard—when, in fact, they should be protecting the Jews from Muslim aggression.
  • Academia in the UK, as in America, is rife with antisemitism, both in the classrooms and on the campuses as a whole.
  • The government routinely attacks Jewish charities based on politically motivated complaints.
  • The courts impose de minimis sentences on violent pro-Palestinian activists engaged in manifestly illegal conduct.

 In other words, Britain has become a systemically antisemitic nation.

Speaking of the police, Melanie Phillips has written a superb essay about the West Midlands Police’s war on the Jews. It’s worth noting that these police operate in what is probably the most Muslim part of Britain, the area around Birmingham.

In Dublin, the city’s politicians are planning on renaming Herzog Park. That park was named after Chaim Herzog, who was born in Belfast and raised in Dublin before becoming Israel’s first president. That’s quite a trajectory for a native son, and something of which Dublin should be proud. But times change, and perhaps it’s not unreasonable for Dublin to rename the park after a Dubliner, whose fame lay in Dublin itself.

That, naturally, is not what the Dublin councilors are planning. Instead, in a deliberate antisemitic slap, they voted to rename the park “Free Palestine Park.” The Free Palestine cry is part of the “From the river to the sea” chant. The antisemites know that the river is the Jordan and the sea is the Mediterranean. The chant calls for the extermination of the Jewish people. Remarkably, there was enough of a backlash that they reversed themselves, but I fully expect them to try again.

Just yesterday, thousands of people marched through London, chanting in support of Gaza and attacking the London Christmas market (a now-common Muslim attack also seen in Brussels). And of course, they called for Israel’s end. As a sidenote, the police allowed this, even as they slapped down a farmers’ protest:

I’ll end with this excellent commentary from the Accidental Talmudist (actually, Salvador Litvak, who wrote and directed Guns & Moses), with his take on why people hate the Jews. I think he’s right. Not all Jews are saints (far from it), but we remind too many people of a moral code they’d prefer to forget.

Antisemitism spirals out of control in once ‘Great’ Britain – American Thinker

UK Man Hurts Anonymous Person’s Feelings, is Put Through ‘13 Weeks of Hell’ – The process is the punishment

The empire on which the sun once never set, “this scepter’d isle” as Shakespeare dubbed it, “This other Eden, demi-paradise… This precious stone set in the silver sea… This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,” continues its tragic death spiral into dystopian decay.

In the latest case in point: the UK Telegraph reports that IT consultant Jon Richelieu-Booth was arrested by police in Britain after he posted a picture online of himself posing with a shotgun – while vacationing in the United States.

Richelieu-Booth, 50, said he was shocked by the “Orwellian” decision by West Yorkshire Police to prosecute him over his social media post on August 13th, which included a picture of himself on LinkedIn holding a shotgun while on a private homestead with friends during a holiday in Florida. The picture was attached to a lengthy, innocuous post about his day and work activities. There was nothing in the post that could be considered threatening.

And yet, as a West Yorkshire Police spokesman later said in a statement,

Police received a complaint of stalking involving serious alarm or distress, relating partly to social media posts, several of which included pictures of a male posing with a variety of firearms which the complainant took to be a threat.

How some internet rando could possibly have considered the picture to be a personal threat is unclear, but nevertheless, upon Richelieu-Booth’s return home, a police officer paid him a visit to warn him that concerns had been raised about the post.

“I was told to be careful what I say online and I need to understand how it makes people feel,” said a flabbergasted Richelieu-Booth, who offered to provide officers with proof that the picture of the firearm had been taken while he was in the U.S. The officers said that was not necessary – but then two officers returned to his home shortly after 10 p.m. on August 24 to arrest him on the allegation of possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. The thought police seized his phone and computers, leaving him unable to work.

Richelieu-Booth was held overnight in a cell before being interviewed, then subsequently released on bail until late October. Police officers then visited his property three more times before he was re-arrested in October, allegedly for breaching his bail conditions – a charge that was later dropped.

The firearms and stalking allegations also were ultimately dropped, but Richelieu-Booth was then charged with a public order offence related to a different social media post “with intent to cause harassment/alarm or distress.” He told the media he is unclear as to which post he was being charged for, but in any case, that charge too was later dropped.

In the wake of this, Richelieu-Booth told reporters, “Anybody should be allowed to say anything they wish, as long as it’s not hateful.” That’s the European perspective; under America’s freer First Amendment, you can actually say something hateful as long as you’re not inciting violence. The UK also lacks a Second Amendment, of course, and one reason Richelieu-Booth was targeted for a harmless social media post may have been to punish him for daring to pose for a photo while enjoying America’s unique freedoms – in particular, the right to bear arms in self-defense against government tyranny.

Richelieu-Booth continued:

When did we go from a society where you can have a discussion with somebody and go, “You know what? I don’t like your opinion. I’m going to disagree with you, but I’m not going to tell you why, I’m going to call the police. When did we get so thin-skinned as a society?

This was a rhetorical question, but the answer is that we reached that point as a society when the totalitarian Left realized they could chill their political opponents’ freedom of speech by surveilling and weaponizing social media. This marked the birth of modern cancel culture.

Richelieu-Booth added, “I have not been able to sleep. I’ve lived in fear of a knock at my door for the last three months. I haven’t spoken to my neighbours for four months.” Without his phone and computers, the investigation “damaged my ability to run my business.”

“It was a massive overreach by the police,” he continued, in an understatement. “This is 1984 writ large.”

In response, “I will be filing a case against the police, I have been put through 13 weeks of hell and I will be seeking quite a lot of damages.”

He added: “I’ve always believed in truth and justice and stood up for the police and believed they are doing an important job of keeping order. Now I have no faith in the police.” Nor should he. Instead of solving or preventing actual robberies, murders, the Muslim grooming gang abuse of countless thousands of white British girls, and rampant migrant knife crime, the UK police have been shamefully reduced to making house calls to intimidate and/or imprison white Brits over anonymously reported tweets.

The West Yorkshire Police spokesman dismissed the force’s bullying of Jon Richelieu-Booth thusly: “Police investigated and charged a man with a public order offence but the case was then discontinued by the CPS.”

No apology, no admission of guilt, no sympathy extended to the victim of their abuse. That’s because the process is the punishment. That’s the totalitarian way, and it has become the new normal in the United Kingdom, where globalist elites strictly enforce a two-tier system of justice: one for the hordes of migrants whose openly antisemitic, anti-Western, Islamic supremacism is defended as “diversity” by such militant multiculturalists as Prime Minister Kier Starmer, and one for the white, working class, indigenous citizens whose righteous anger is smeared as hatred of the brown “other.” Those citizens can’t even enjoy a legal outing at the shooting range in a foreign country without being treated like a subversive threat in their own once-great nation – a country that is rapidly coming to resemble, as Jon Richelieu-Booth put it, “1984 writ large.”

frontpagemag

UK: Gender-confused man jailed for deceiving lover about sex

John Arehart/Shutterstock

For the last few decades, it has been popular to make fun of folks who still hold to the admittedly antiquated ideals of Christian chastity as “prudes” and “puritans.” The term “virgin” became a mocking slur; those who got married young and promptly had children were met with sneers. (Try walking through a busy city with a few children under the age of five.) After all, we are now free to do whatever we like with whomever we want.

True, what we “like” might be shaped by pornography that we stumbled across as children and permanently deformed our sexual tastes; true, we don’t even know what we should like. But according to the sexual revolutionaries who have conquered our culture, we should be thrilled that we no longer must settle down with one person and love them for the rest of our lives, perhaps even with (gasp) children, if we are blessed with them.

But almost every day, my social media feed fills up with articles that tell a very different story. For example, this recent headline from the BBC: “Transgender woman jailed for deception sex assault.” What is going on there? Well, let’s let the UK’s state broadcaster explain:

 A transgender woman who lied to a man about being a biological female when she performed sex acts with him has been jailed for 21 months. Ciara Watkin’s victim said he would not have consented to sexual activity if he had known she was biologically male, Durham Crown Court heard. Watkin, 21 and from Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees, had claimed the man would have realised her status, but jurors found her guilty of sexual assault. Recorder Peter Makepeace KC said he was “certain” the victim “fully believed from start to finish” that Watkin was a female due to her “lies and deception”.

Some translation is, of course, necessary—the media organs of the sexual revolutionaries speak a different language. A “transgender woman” is a man who identifies as a woman. This man’s victim is a man who engaged in sexual activity with him because he didn’t know he was a he—even though the trans-identifying man hadn’t “undergone any medical treatment or surgery,” which is to say that he was quite…ahem…obviously a he.

When the man found out that the sexual activity he was engaging in was, in fact, homosexual activity, he promptly pressed charges with the outrage that only a soiled dove can muster. He had consented, of course. But that was when he thought he was a she, and, as he actually told police officers, he does not “swing that way” and was very upset to discover that he had swung that way.

Say what you will about your prudish forebears, but I’ll bet you a million bucks that they never ended up in situations like that.

The victim of this stealth homosexual complained to the police that he felt like had had some of his masculinity stolen from him–although we really should probably define our terms a bit. What is “masculinity”? What is a man, for that matter? The court that convicted the “transgender woman” of sexual assault for not revealing that he was not a woman referred to him, throughout the proceedings, with female pronouns. They really should make up their minds.

Anyway, the “transgender woman” must now register as a sex offender and has a restraining order preventing him from contacting his victim ever again. Detective Constable Martin Scotson of the Cleveland Police, who probably didn’t think this was the sort of thing he would be policing when he signed up for cop school, announced solemnly that the offender had “purposely concealed her sex for the sexual activity to take place” and that “had the victim been aware that Ciara was biologically male, he would not have consented.”

Ah, yes. “She” concealed “her” sex, which would have revealed that “she” was a “he” as revealed by the presence of “his”… Well, you know. So the man who we recognize as a woman because he identifies as one is now a sex offender for identifying as a woman. The important thing here is that justice has been done, everything has been cleared up, and the victim has his masculinity back, such as it was.

Even more importantly, we can be very relieved that we no longer live in a time when men married women and had babies and built families that built a civilization. Those really were horrible and even prudish times.

lifesitenews