Mamdani is a political tragedy for those whol love Western freedoms

ChatGPT americanthinker

by Giulio Meotti

The new mayor of New York seems straight out of the pen of the famous Daily Telegraph humorist, Peter Simple.

Like Mrs. Dutt-Pauker, who symbolized the “Hampstead Liberal,” the typical representative of the United Kingdom’s progressive elites. Mrs. Dutt-Pauker is a very wealthy heiress living in Hampstead, in a mansion called “Marxmount House,” where she collects a pair of Bukharin’s teeth, Ming vases, constructivist art, and Stalin’s writings. Mrs. Dutt-Pauker is in love with Walter Ulbricht, the communist leader of East Germany, and has a son named “Brecht Mao Rudy Che” – in honor of the communist playwright, the Great Chinese Helmsman, the ’68 leader, and Che Guevara.

Thus begins the “Mamdani experiment,” as Gregg Roman of the Middle East Forum calls it: a mix of socialism and Islam (even in Virginia, Democrats have elected a Muslim woman, because demographics do not explain everything – but almost – including the retirement of the very elderly Nancy Pelosi).

There is nothing funny about it: Mamdani’s victory is a tragedy for America and for the West. That is why the Islamic Republic of Iran celebrates, Hamas celebrates, the taqiya mayor of London celebrates, the jihadists celebrate.

Mamdani will not wage a holy war or a class war, but a cultural war.

It will be ruthless, dirty, and ruinous.

How did an Islamist socialist get elected to lead a city of terrorism survivors, “America’s most Jewish city”, and defeat an Italo-American political dynasty (the Cuomos) in what was once an Italo-American city?

Because that New York City no longer exists. There will no longer be Jewish, Italian, or Irish mayors in New York.

In 1989, during Jewish mayor Ed Koch’s last year in office, Jews outnumbered Muslims 4 to 1. When Zohran Mamdani defeated Andrew Cuomo, there were more Muslims than Italian Americans in New York. Once “America’s most Jewish city” and an “Italian city,” it has been redefined by waves of mass Islamic immigration, as many European cities have.

Like all socialists, Mamdani has lived a comfortable, privileged life. His father is a professor of African Studies at Columbia University, his mother a film director who tried to have Gal Gadot’s Oscar invitation withdrawn because the actress is Israeli. His father is the true ideologue: John Aziz in Quillette describes Mahmood Mamdani’s hatred for America and the West – and his writings on the need to “destigmatize suicide bombings.”

Mamdani attended a $60,000-a-year private school, then went to Bowdoin College in leafy Brunswick, Maine, where he founded a “Students for Justice in Palestine” chapter.

To understand who New York’s new mayor is, one must read a Wall Street Journal profile. Mamdani’s old tweets show that, at 20, he seemed more concerned about the civil rights of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and U.S.-born al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki than about their victims’ suffering. More recently, Mamdani appeared alongside Turkish-American podcaster Hasan Piker, who once said that America “deserved 9/11.”

Mamdani also has a long record of anti-Israel activism.

Robert Tucker, New York City’s Jewish fire commissioner, was the first to resign just hours after Mamdani’s election victory.

Within ten years, New York will need another Rudy Giuliani to clean house – and the toppled statue of Christopher Columbus will be found wrapped in a keffiyeh or a chador.

But what I fear most is that under the reign of the socialist Islamist comrade, the city of 9/11 will again be struck at its heart.

And here I truly hope I am wrong – and that I never have to republish these words.

israelnationalnews

Two mass brawls in three hours on Sonnenallee in Berlin due to criticism of Palestinians

At 5.30 p.m., things got out of hand: two young men, a German (20) and a Syrian (23), were targeted by 30 to 40 attackers. The reason? Comments the two had made about the Middle East conflict, according to a police spokesperson. ‘The men are said to have made critical comments about the Palestinian president and Gaza,’ the spokesman said.

The attackers resort to brute force. Punches to the head and tear gas to the face. The victims suffer from breathing difficulties, swelling and bruising. The group fled before the police arrived. Both victims had to be treated in hospital. Just three hours later, at 8.30 p.m., the police were called out to Sonnenallee again. Another brawl, this time involving up to 30 people. Pepper spray is used here too. But when the police arrive, the thugs have already disappeared. First arrests: the officers catch two 19-year-olds. Shortly afterwards, six more suspects are apprehended, aged between 16 and 22. All eight are facing charges of aggravated breach of the peace. Is there a connection between the incidents? Police spokeswoman Jane Berndt says: ‘There is currently no connection.’ But the investigation continues. The police state security department is investigating.

A night of violence on Sonnenallee. The Berlin police are faced with a puzzle.

bz-berlin

Polish court fines journalists for using quotes emailed by State media official

A Polish court has fined two journalists from one of Poland’s largest online news outlets for publishing statements sent to them by email  from a public media official without obtaining his authorisation for their use.

A Warsaw district court has ordered both journalists, Patryk Słowik and Paweł Figurski from the portal Wirtualna Polska, to pay a €250 fine for the offence. 

The case concerns Michał Kaczmarczyk, a member of the programme council of the State-controlled Polish Radio and Polish Press Agency (PAP),  who was the subject of two articles published by Słowik and Figurski. 

One alleged that associates of Kaczmarczyk, who is rector of a private college in the Silesian city of Sosnowiec, were involved in selling certificates. The other claimed that his appointment to both boards had been politically driven. 

Kaczmarczyk had sent the two journalists comments in response to their enquiries and they quoted those comments word for word in their article.

Under Poland’s press law, journalists are obliged to grant their interviewees the right to verify and authorise any quotes before they are published. 

Słowik argues that, in this case, there was no legal obligation to seek authorisation. “We didn’t change or manipulate his statement.

“We quoted it word for word,” he told outlet Press, adding that he did not quote the full email as parts had nothing to do with the questions asked.

The two journalists said they were surprised in October to learn that Kaczmarczyk had contacted the police and they had been ordered to court for failing to obtain authorisation for using the quotes.

The court ruling handed down on November 5 is a penalty order after a hearing without the participation of the two journalists concerned. Such rulings are issued in cases the court deems to be “straightforward” and are usually issued purely based on the indictment.

The subjects of the ruling have a week in which to file a challenge and Słowik says that he will do so.

“Paying the €250 would be faster, simpler and cheaper than spending months arguing in court that there is no need for authorisation of statements someone knowingly sends to journalists,” he said.

“However, I sincerely believe that I’m fighting for the interests of journalists in this case.”

That position was supported by, among others, the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (HFHR), which argued that when an interviewee provides a written statement and a journalist quotes it faithfully, authorisation is unnecessary.

Wirtualna Polska is a portal that has in recent months been critical of the Tusk government. It is not, though, known for having any links with or sympathies for the opposition Conservatives (PiS) about whom it has often published critical material. 

“The purpose of authorisation is to ensure the truthfulness of the message and protect against distortion, while simultaneously respecting press freedom,” read the statement from HFHR. 

Kaczmarczyk has also launched legal action against Wirtualna Polska over the website’s reporting on him. In October a hearing was held in another case he brought against a local newspaper, Dziennik Zachodni, for its reporting on the certificates story.

He has refused to make any comment on the court proceedings in all the cases he is involved in as witness or “victim”. 

Poland has been criticised in the European Commission’s rule of law reports for a lack of protection of journalists rights. It particularly pointed to the fact that in Poland defamation is a criminal offence that could land the alleged perpetrator in prison and that threat has often been used against journalists.

brusselssignal

Anglicans could be converting to Catholicism in droves soon: here’s why

Westminster Abbey, consecrated in 1065, stands in a tranquil moonlit skyline, an iconic Anglican church in London’s City of Westminster, softly reflected on the River Thames. Shutterstock

The Catholic Church should expect waves of Anglicans coming back to Rome, a former Anglican bishop said.

“(T)he Catholic Church should be prepared for new groups of Anglicans seeking union with it, as during previous conversion waves,” Monsignor Michael James Nazir-Ali said in a recent interview with OSV News.

Nazir-Ali is a former Anglican bishop who entered the Catholic Church in 2021 through the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham and is now a Catholic priest.

The former Anglican prelate told LifeSiteNews what he believes are the main reasons for this influx of Anglicans into the Catholic Church.

“No church is perfect, but the main reasons for coming seem to have to do with continuity in apostolic teaching, a proper method in engaging with contemporary issues, without capitulating to the zeitgeist, and an adequate local and universal magisterium which can declare, clarify, and explain the faith of the Church, without changing it,” he said.

“There are other, more difficult to describe, reasons such as sacramental assurance and confidence in apostolic ministry which weigh more heavily for some,” Nazir-Ali told LifeSiteNews.

He said that this trend of Anglicans leaving the Church of England for Catholicism “is likely to continue.”

Despite some confusion in recent years, especially during the pontificate of Pope Francis, the security of the unchanging doctrine of the Catholic Church has a strong attraction for conservative Anglicans, who are faced with the moral and theological collapse of their church.

The recent appointment of the first female as the Archbishop of Canterbury was an inflection point, but it was in many ways just the tip of the iceberg. Sarah Mullally was named to the highest ecclesiastical position in the Anglican Church despite her being pro-abortion and pro-LGBT. However, the Church of England began “ordaining” women in 1994, and the first female “bishop” was appointed in 2014, so the phenomenon is not a new one.

A few months earlier, the openly lesbian Cherry Vann was named as the Archbishop of Wales.

While these appointments have been celebrated by progressives and the mainstream media, conservative factions of the Anglican Church, especially in Africa, have severed their ties to the Church of England over the heterodox, progressivist positions of Mullally and large parts of the British Episcopate.

This fallout among Anglicans represents an immense opportunity for the Catholic Church to attract many new members who are disillusioned by the Church of England’s heterodoxy and are seeking a safe haven of sound doctrine and tradition, Nazir-Ali argues.

Nazir-Ali recently spoke at the Global Anglican Future Conference, or GAFCON, a group that claims to represent at least half the global Anglican population of 85 million, who have split with the Church of England over the appointment of Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury, since she teaches “unbiblical and revisionist teachings.”

“The Church of England has clearly decided to go the way of liberal Protestant denominations, abandoning any claims to be upholding the Catholic apostolic succession,” Msgr. Nazir-Ali said.

He told OSV News that GAFCON’s insistence on the autonomy of Anglican provinces deciding their own doctrine and giving their own interpretation of scripture as the “sole foundation of communion” will lead to future problems.

“The Catholic Church agrees Scripture is the highest authority in matters of faith — but relying on Scripture alone is dangerous,” he said. “Meanwhile, if each province is free to do what it likes, this is a recipe for chaos in today’s fast-changing world.”

For many, joining the Catholic Church will remain the only viable option, Nazir-Ali believes.

However, another famous Catholic convert from Anglicanism, the former chaplain of Queen Elizabeth II, Gavin Ashenden, offers a more cautious prediction.

In a recent article on his Substack, Ashenden says that while many leave the Church of England, joining the Catholic Church requires them to abandon their Protestant thinking, which will not be an easy task for many.

Former Anglicans must understand that the Catholic Church is not just another denomination but the one true Church founded by Jesus Christ.

“It’s this surrender — the giving up of opinions, or indeed the right to have opinions — that proves so profoundly unsettling and unaccommodating to the Protestant mind. It’s often too much,” Ashenden wrote. “Most Protestants stop there; they cannot accept the authority of the Catholic Church, which is, of course, the authority of Jesus and the Holy Spirit.”

“Learning an entirely new way of looking at Jesus, at Mary, at the Mass, at the supernatural, at the existence, power and influence of the Saints, and at the reality of evil — all this will require a revolution in the mind of the Protestant,” he said. “And simply being fed up that the Church of England no longer has any ethics or proper reference point of its own is insufficient.”

However, Ashenden still thinks the current crisis is an excellent opportunity for Catholics to reach Anglicans, and he suggested inviting them to Mass and to read the Catechism. He argued that Protestants need to learn about authentic history and philosophy before the Reformation in the 16th century and rid their minds of the propaganda they have been fed about the Catholic Church.

There are definitely hopeful signs in the U.K. already, as Gen Z Catholics now outnumber Anglicans by 2 to 1 in the country that severed its ties to the Catholic Church in 1534 under King Henry VIII. The number of Generation Z churchgoers in the UK has jumped from 4% in 2018 to 16% in 2025, marking a return to faith and a possible upward trend of more and more people of the younger generation embracing God and the Catholic faith.

lifesitenews

That lingering stench of fraud from Tuesday’s election

By Monica Showalter

You’d think Democrats, like terrorists, would up their game once revelations of their tactics became widely known.

But apparently they haven’t — the same old fraud reports are showing up again, in scattered reports from the wake of this week’s elections in California, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania:

BREAKING – Conservatives are now pointing to inconsistencies in the New Jersey gubernatorial race after nearly 500,000 new voters appeared from 2021 to 2025, more than double the state’s population growth over four years, with almost all of them going to Democrats. pic.twitter.com/TR9qxRePv0

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) November 6, 2025

This report, in Pennsylvania:

When it comes to blue-state voting foulups, never attribute to stupidity what can be explained by malice. https://t.co/i4igaeGZ7A

— @instapundit (@instapundit) November 4, 2025

Here’s another report from the both of them:

In red districts of PA and NJ voting machines are broken or ran out of ballots or independents voters missing from voter rolls bomb threars and swatting called in on GOP locations pre filled out ballots (for Dems) in VA ….NO KINGS. you all are such frauds.

— Chop Block (@RoseDaddyMike) November 4, 2025

In California, there’s this:

Blank California Prop 50 ballots found scattered throughout a homeless encampment

“Hundreds of items of stolen mail, but more alarming were roughly a hundred pieces of voting material. Deputies found unvoted ballots for the statewide special election scattered across the site” pic.twitter.com/5ORSr1U3NA— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) November 7, 2025

I also saw a tweet with pictures of a voter saying her ballot was already pre-filled out, here’s a tweet that hints at the problem.

We know they cheated! They were handing in ballots that were already filled out for the Democrats. They were handing out ballots in New York, and then they were handing out ballots in California to Chinese people that didn’t even know what they were filling out for prop 50.— Faithingod (@ConstanceDale19) November 5, 2025

There are also unhappy details like this, though I wouldn’t put it past the Democrat operatives in the postal service to have  ‘accidentally’ delayed the delivery of the mail:

More incompetence by the @CAGOP … their junk mail arriving AFTER the election is over. I reiterate my call for the party Chair to resign…and the board to do its job to overhaul before Nov ’26 https://t.co/9CIiv9u5Gv— Carl DeMaio (@carldemaio) November 6, 2025

And this was suspicious, too:

Interesting how all of a sudden California was able to count all the votes in just one night without any late night drop offs or issues happening during the count.— Based Bandita (@BasedBandita) November 5, 2025

While I think the result was probably the right one, given the appeal of tyranny of the majority, and conservative voters’ lack of faith in the process, all I can wonder is why this is still happening, years after the first fraud reports appeared — and why Democrats keep getting away with these shenanigans now, zero worries about law enforcement stopping them.

If this isn’t a bugle call to the Trump administration to put the full force of law and legislation onto free and fair elections before the Democrats win back the House and maybe the Senate, all we can look forward to in the future is is more Hugo Chavez-style fraud with years of rubble and ruin ahead of us. We don’t have a big power that can use its military to hose the hellhole out as Venezuela does, so it could get ugly quick and stay long. One can only hope that adequate resources are put into election integrity at the federal level or we are goners.

americanthinker

A Nation Under Siege: 67,000 Linked to Sweden’s Gang Crisis

Screengrab youtube

Sweden’s police have revealed that more than 67,000 people are now involved in or connected to organised gang crime, underscoring the scale of a crisis that has transformed one of Europe’s most peaceful nations into a hotspot of deadly violence.

According to a new national assessment published on Friday, November 7th, 17,500 individuals are considered active gang criminals, while a further 50,000 are believed to have links to criminal networks through family, social circles, or low-level offences.

The figures represent a sharp rise from last year’s estimate of 14,000 active members, though police said the increase is partly due to a revised counting method.

Police Commissioner Petra Lundh described the situation as “extremely serious” at a joint press conference in Stockholm with Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer.

“We see no clear signs of either an increase or decrease, but the groups of active gang criminals—and those connected to them—are far too large,” Lundh said.

The officials also presented limited demographic data about the gangs. Eight in ten active gang members hold Swedish citizenship, though the police did not specify how many are first- or second-generation immigrants. Just under one in ten have dual citizenship, while slightly more than 10%are foreign nationals. The average age of those identified as gang criminals is 28.

Strömmer called the report “confirmation of a continuing grave situation” but insisted that government policies were beginning to make an impact. He cited a modest drop in shootings as evidence of progress. However, bombings have continued to rise, and 2025 may still end as one of the worst years on record for gang-related violence.

Sweden has experienced near-daily shootings and explosions in recent years, many of them carried out by teenagers recruited as “child soldiers” by criminal groups. Police say gang leaders often operate from abroad, directing attacks via encrypted messaging apps.

The centre-right government of Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson has vowed to restore order through sweeping criminal justice reforms. Among the measures are lowering the age of criminal responsibility from 15 to 13, creating special youth prisons for violent offenders, and abolishing lenient youth sentencing.

Lundh stressed that policing alone could not solve the problem. “This type of crime cannot simply be prosecuted away. We must also prevent it earlier and stop the influx of children and young people ready to commit violent acts,” she said.

Despite tougher laws and expanded police powers, Sweden’s gang war remains a defining political and social challenge—one that continues to test the country’s stability.

europeanconservative

France: Pro-migrant Catholic priest accused of ‘system of sexual exploitation’ against migrant minors at reception center he ran in Morocco for 4 years

Father Antoine Exelmans pictured with a number of migrants in his care in Morocco.

A report has embroiled the Catholic Church in a pedophile scandal, this time involving an award-winning priest targeting migrants.

Father Antoine Exelmans stands accused of sexual abuse in Morocco. He was ordained in Rennes, France, in 1993, serving as a priest in several parishes in Ille-et-Vilaine and as a chaplain to students in Rennes.

Some of his previous pro-migration statements are now seen in an entirely different light following the allegations.

“ I am leaving at a time when issues related to migrants and Islam are prominent and a source of tension. Some respond with mistrust, fear, and resistance. From my point of view, these differences are an opportunity,” said Antoine Exelmans in 2016. “This globalization, these cultural and religious divergences, are a treasure of fraternity that we must build together.”

If the allegations are true, he also saw an “opportunity” to sexually abuse migrant boys.

His charges stem from his time heading up the migrant reception service at the Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes church in Casablanca, where the news Enass revealed he had set up “a system of sexual exploitation (…) against migrant and refugee minors” for at least four years, between 2021 and 2024. The portal lists six alleged victims: one Cameroonian and five Guineans, writes FranceInfo.

Meanwhile, Le Monde states that Exelmans admitted to the acts during an internal Church investigation, according to the Diocese of Rennes.

The findings from the investigation have been sent to Rome. 

Exelmans first went to the Central African Republic sometime before 2004, after which he returned to France to serve at the parish of Maurepas until 2009. He then worked at a youth ministry in Bangui until 2012.  

For a few years, his whereabouts appear to be unknown. However, he served as the parish priest of Saint-Melaine-aux-Rives-du-Meu from 2016 until 2021. It was then that he helped establish the Tabitha Solidarité association to support exiled people in difficulty.

In 2016, Exelmans was sent to the diocese of Rabat, where he became vicar general. In the bulletin of the Blessed Frédéric Ozanam parish, he wrote a long letter in which he indicated that he was accompanying “in a specific way, in Casablanca, four young people who came from Oujda to live with [him] at the Casablanca presbytery, given their extreme fragility (post-traumatic stress situation with disabling somatizations to resume a normal life, depression, stress… in short a need for attention day and night).” 

After a complaint was filed in May 2024, Exelmans left Morocco. The migrant reception center that he was running has since been shut down. 

Exelmans was awarded the Aachen Peace Prize 2020 for having “dedicated his life to helping migrants and refugees in Morocco.” According to the InfoMigrants website, “The German award is given each year to women, men or groups who fight against injustice and for peace.”

According to Enass, three of the six victims were interviewed by the National Brigade of the Judicial Police (BNPJ) in Casablanca. The priest was questioned by the judicial police in France, according to Le Monde and is currently under house arrest in a Jesuit community in Saint-Étienne.

FranceInfo notes that despite a newsletter being sent out by the Blessed Frédéric Ozanam parish last January, in which the Archbishop of Rennes, Pierre d’Ornellas, asked anyone with information about Father Exelmans to come forward, this newsletter was not published on the website of the Diocese of Rennes and Ille-et-Vilaine.

rmx

Meloni moves to restrict power of activist judiciary

Giorgia Meloni © European Union, 1998 – 2025, Attribution, via Wikimedia Commons

The government of Italy’s Giorgia Meloni is now the third-longest in the history of the post-war Italian republic. Her polling has been stable, with Meloni’s Brothers of Italy hovering at the 30 per cent mark for the entirety of her time in office. For a country whose prime ministers last, on average, just over a year, this is no easy feat.

Meloni was partially able to achieve this by spending many of her first few years placating her moderate coalition allies and Brussels establishmentarians, a move which enabled her to get past initial scepticism of her party’s far-right sympathies. At the same time, she was able quietly to enact socially conservative wins and lay groundwork for a pan-Western nationalism. 

But now that she is firmly ensconced, she has set her sights on making significant changes to Italian law. And while some have made a splash – such as one which restricts the ability of protestors to block traffic and cause commotions – her largest move to date has dwarfed them all: A reconfiguration of Italy’s judiciary.

The legislation, which has now passed the Italian Senate, would reshape Italy’s judicial system by banning prosecutors and judges from switching roles throughout their career. Italian prosecutors and judges also are currently allowed to police themselves; oversight is conducted by a council to which members of the judiciary can be elected. The council would be split in half and its members would be selected at random, rather than election (which allows outside lobbying, as the judiciary is dominated by activist judges).

This move has infuriated the opposition, which has claimed the government is seeking to “put itself above the laws and the constitution.” Which is odd, as the law does little actually to restrict the power of judges. It also is not even law yet: As Meloni’s government does not have a two-thirds majority, the law will go before the people in a referendum early next year. All in all, a pretty milquetoast move: Italy’s people will be asked moderately to restrict judicial shoulder-rubbing. Why, then, is there such fury?

Before answering that question, it’s worth hopping around Europe, because Italy is not the only place where populists have gone to war with judges. Austria’s judicial system has kept populist politicians under investigation – while leaking saucy, supposedly private, details to friends in the press – for years on end, and the judicial system even drove Sebastian Kurz out of office without him even being convicted of a crime. Romania’s constitutional court banned a nationalist from running because voters had a “right to be informed” – and obviously, no informed voter could vote for a nationalist.

A member of Germany’s AfD were prosecuted for pointing out that Afghan migrants commit gang rapes at higher rates than others. Instead of looking into whether there may be some issues with any system which would levy such a prosecution, Germany’s outgoing elected officials changed the rules to “protect” the judiciary from any parties which may win power.

In some places, populists have managed to eke out victories – or at least, they seemed to. That was the case in Poland, where the Conservative Law & Justice party were able to appoint judges who the opposition claimed were “political.” Then, the court made decisions which were derided as “political,” such as ruling most abortions illegal. Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s government has simply taken to ignoring these judges outright, claiming that they are – you guessed it – political, and that they were wrongly appointed.

This verbal two-step is not unique to Poland. Establishmentarians everywhere – including in the United States – love to pretend that all judges are, by default, non-political – until a judge is appointed by a populist, whereby they become rabidly political forces who must be ignored. But this is, of course, untrue: There is zero chance that establishmentarians would be putting judges into office who will regularly rule against them. They, like any other politician, are putting in judges who will uphold their own way of thinking; In Tusk’s case, it’s progressive democracy. 

This is why there is such immense fury at what seems to be a relatively simple change to Italian law: Because anything which weakens the power of the judicial system, or breaks up its establishment-approved configuration, is a threat to the established order. Populists have always existed, and establishments have, from time to time, lost power briefly; but in the past, they have been able to rely upon judges as a backstop until they can get back into power. This is why last year’s reveal that an Italian judge had called Meloni “dangerous” because there were no investigations against her was extremely damaging: Because it pulled back the curtain on just how political so-called “independent” judges are.

The more threatened an establishment is, the less likely they are to listen to judges, particularly those appointed by populists. Tusk already has had to deal with two nationalistic presidents opposed to his policies; if he listened to a court which had been appointed by opponents, he would get even less done than he already is (which is not much).

So what’s the play for the populists, if Law & Justice’s judges are being ignored? The answer is moves like Meloni has made: Weaken the power of the judiciary to fraternise and to create their own networks. In cases like Viktor Orbán, when you have the power for a long period of time, they should use it to fill the judiciary with like-minded figures; FDR in the United States did the same when he filled the Supreme Court with appointees.

But, if possible, populists should consider going farther, by curbing excess power of the judiciary. Establishment judges throughout the West have, as populists have gained power, dramatically expanded their own. This occurred at a record pace in the United States, as district judges – who are often in charge of small geographical areas – have made law for the entire country. Likewise for figures like Brazil’s Alexandre de Moraes, who has been accused of expanding his power so greatly as to effectively become an unelected national leader.

By curbing this excess power, the issue becomes moot. Judges should not be able to make national law wholesale and with impunity. If we are to live in a democracy, the victors – including populists – must be allowed actually to govern.

brusselssignal