Month: September 2025

London Flooded with Free Speech Protesters for Tommy Robinson’s ‘Unite the Kingdom’ Rally

Screengrab youtube

Vast crowds of Britons waving the Union Jack and St George flags descended on central London on Saturday for the “Unite the Kingdom” rally organised by veteran anti-grooming gang activist Tommy Robinson.

The demonstration comes in the wake of local protests throughout the country over the Summer in opposition to the mass migration agenda imposed upon the UK and the government scheme to house supposed asylum seekers in hotels at taxpayers’ expense, which became a flashpoint of anger following the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl by an illegal immigrant from Ethiopia living in a hotel in Epping.

Robinson, a frequent target of censorship, a longtime street activist in England, and one of the early voices to warn of the plight of young working-class white girls being systematically raped and abused by mainly Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs, said that the protest on Saturday represented the start of a “cultural revolution” in the UK.

“Today, London stands tall in defence of one of our most vital rights – free speech. Over a million have gathered to make their voices heard,” Robinson claimed on X. The Metropolitan Police, which typically does not provide crowd size estimates, claimed that there were far fewer, estimating around 110,000 in attendance, according to The Telegraph.

Robinson also shared footage of “British patriots” chanting the name of American free speech activist and founder of Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated at a university student debate event in Utah on Wednesday.

Others were seen carrying wooden crosses and signs that read “stop the boats” in reference to the illegal migrant crisis in the English Channel. Some were also seen in ‘Make England Great Again’ hats.

Addressing the crowd, actor Laurence Fox, who was cancelled from his acting career for pushing back against the leftist concept of white privilege, described the assassination of Kirk as the “most appalling thing” but said that “you can never kill the truth”.

“We will take the sword, every single time to those that try to shut down free speech,” Fox declared.

“Free speech belongs to every single one of us, it doesn’t discriminate between rich or poor. We must defend it with everything or else we will be ruled by the tyrannical hordes of angry, envious and greedy people… I pray Charlie Kirk and I pray for the great people of America and you wonderful people that came out today for our nation.”

Fox also warned against the “demographic suicide” of Britain in allowing in “untold numbers of people who have no interest in our nation, no affinity for our nation, no desire to integrate and assimilate into our nation… and we have no where else to go.”

Taking to the stage, Robinson said that the “traitors in Westminster” are “cowering” over the mass demonstration, adding a warning to the prime minister and the governing left-wing Labour Party: “The revolution has started!”

“We are done being gagged, we are done watching our communities crumble at the hands of open border, mass uncontrolled immigration. Our women, our daughters, are scared to walk the streets. Their safety has been taken from them, and what do the elite do? They took Epping community to court and they said that the rights of undocumented migrants supersede the rights of the local community.

“They told the world, that Somalians, Afghanis, Pakistanis, and all of them, their rights supersede yours, the British public, the people that built this nation, the people whose families have sacrificed for this nation.”

“They managed to silence us for twenty years with labels: racist, islamophobe, far-right. They don’t work anymore,” he proclaimed. “The damn has well and truly burst… The silent majority will be silent no longer.”

London’s Metropolitan Police said that it had deployed over 1,600 officers to police the United Kingdom rally, in addition to the counter-demonstration organised by the leftist Stand Up to Racism group, and several football matches. The police force stated that it had drafted at least 500 officers from outside London to assist in managing the crowds.

Commander Clair Haynes, who is leading the Met’s policing operations for the protests over the weekend, claimed that the force will “approach them as we do any other protests, policing without fear or favour, ensuring people can exercise their lawful rights but being robust in dealing with incidents or offences should they occur.”

Haynes also said that “officers will take a firm line on behaviour that is discriminatory or that crosses the line from protest into hate crime.”

Unlike other protests, such as the frequent pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London, the Met specifically pointed out the “concerns for many in London’s Muslim communities ahead of the ‘Unite the Kingdom’ protest given the record of anti-Muslim rhetoric and incidents of offensive chanting by a minority at previous marches.”

“There have been some suggestions that Muslim Londoners should change their behaviour this Saturday, including not coming into town. That is not our advice. Everyone should be able to feel safe travelling into and around London. Our officers are there to ensure that is the case and we’d urge anyone who is out on Saturday and feels concerned to speak to us,” Haynes said.

At around 1 pm local time, the Met said that there had “been no incidents of note so far.” However, the force later reported that some officers had been assaulted while sharing footage apparently showing a crowd waving Antifa flags in close proximity to the Robinson rally.

breitbart

France: Outrage and indignation among shepherds and hikers following the destruction of the cross at Col de la Crouzette, a three-century-old symbol of the Pyrenees

Screengrab youtube

The cross on the Col de la Crouzette (photo), an ancient monument between the Bethmale and Eychelles valleys, was destroyed again over the weekend of August 15, 2025. It was smashed on site, presumably with a sledgehammer. An incomprehensible act that has outraged shepherds and hikers. Beyond its topographical function, the cross had a strong symbolic meaning and was a witness to a heritage passed down from generation to generation.

For twenty-five years, the cross on the Col de la Crouzette, also known as Portet d’Eychelles, has been the target of several acts of vandalism. This stone cross, erected at the crossroads of the Eychelles valley and the summer pastures of Haute Serre in the commune of Bethmale, long marked the transition between the valleys of Bethmale, Soueix,

In 2001, the original cross was stolen. Two years later, a new cross, carved from stone quarried below the Col de la Core on the Seix side, was erected in the same place.

The work is by Thierry Galey, a resident of Samortein-en-Bethmale and a draughtsman in the aeronautical industry in Toulouse. In 2004, this new cross was blessed by Abbé Jean Fauroux, who was already known for blessing the cross on Mont Valier. At the time, the mayor of Bethmale was confident: ‘The perpetrators had better arm themselves with chisels and hammers to tear it down.’ […]

La Dépêche

Black on White Crime: The Wrong Narrative

DeCarlos Brown was released from jail 14 times before he went on to stab Iryna Zarutska.
@bennyjohnson on X, 9 September 2025

The savage murder of 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina, took place almost three weeks ago. It has, alas, only recently been acknowledged by the mainstream media. The CCTV footage, widely circulated via social media, is chilling for so many reasons—not least of which is the fact that the killer, DeCarlos Brown Jr, is oft-depicted hovering ghoul-like behind the unsuspecting Iryna as she casually checks her phone. There could be no finer meme juxtaposing the evil stalking the West and the innocence of those picking up the tab. 

When they determined they could ignore Zarutska’s murder no longer, the media were predictably disingenuous in their reporting, electing either to blame the Right for making political capital or hiding behind the passive voice to such an extent that it is not clear who stabbed whom: 

The New York Times: A Gruesome Murder in North Carolina Ignites a Firestorm on the Right

CNN: How the lives of a Ukrainian refugee and a Charlotte man with a criminal history converged in a fatal stabbing

Axios: Stabbing video fuels MAGA’s crime message

The pattern, regrettably, is a tried and tested one. When innocent white victims are routinely slaughtered at the hands of black criminals, Western liberals are faced with an uncomfortable dilemma: what to do about the racial overtones? Racism, while so fundamental to the black victimhood narrative, is convenient to ignore when it doesn’t suit your argument. To the Left, the bad guys are not so much the criminals themselves but invariably the conservatives who dare to notice a possible connection.

While racist attacks against whites are difficult to substantiate—partly because the fashionable view is that one cannot be racist towards whites, and partly because no one who matters wants to mention it—the pattern is getting harder to ignore. What was it, for instance, that made Emmanuel Aranda (who was ‘looking for someone to kill’) choose five-year-old Landen Hoffmann to throw off a third-floor balcony? Why did Darius Sessoms elect to shoot and kill five-year-old Cannon Hinnant, whose only crime it seems was riding his bike? And what exactly was it about the three beautiful little girls, Bebe, Elsie, and Alice, that so aggravated Axel Rudakubana in Southport? 

Race, however, is pivotal in this case—as witnessed by DeCarlos himself. The CCTV footage clearly shows DeCarlos saying, “I got that white girl.” He also chose not to target the four black passengers in the vicinity—none of whom, incidentally, sprang to Iryna’s aid after she was repeatedly stabbed. 

Had the races been reversed (white assailant, black victim, white bystanders), the Left would finally have got the image, the meme and the Netflix series it has been chasing for decades. Instead, it has to content itself with canonising scumbags like George Floyd and Chris Kaba. 

Still, on the upside, there will be no riots for Zarutska—a woman who tragically swapped a genuine warzone for the ‘vibrant diversity’ of Charlotte. She was neither black nor a career criminal nor a gang member. In the end, that may have been to her detriment.

As is so often the case, the authorities are arguably complicit in Zarutska’s death. It is not uncommon for ultra-lenient sentences to be handed out to black criminals. As a case in point, recall the astonishing community service granted to Brittany Covington, who chose to live-stream the torture and beating of a mentally handicapped man. That was nothing, however, compared to the suspended sentence given to Joshua Gardner. Gardner was involved in a traffic altercation and attempted to break into the opposing car with an enormous zombie knife in what looks like a clear case of attempted murder. 

Unsurprisingly then, DeCarlos Brown—despite a decade of arrests, including for robbery with a dangerous weapon and assault—was released by Judge Teresa Stokes on nothing more than a written promise to appear. This has led Republicans to call for her dismissal. Thanks to Judge Stokes, Iryna didn’t get a second chance in life; DeCarlos got 14.

Of course, individual cases mean little when building an overall picture. But building an overall picture is difficult when the anti-whiteness of the authorities is an open secret. In Britain, the police are loath to record the race of suspects—omitting to do so in a staggering two-thirds of those referred to Prevent, the counter-extremism programme. Draw your own conclusions as to why that might be. The UK constabulary also ignore ‘hate incidents’ committed against whites. 

None of this is new. Two decades ago, even the fantastically left-leaning Guardian was reporting on the fact that black-on-white crime goes underreported, as it is simply unpalatable to the media. Here is former Chief Constable of Cheshire, Peter Fahy, explaining the media’s lack of curiosity when murder victims are young white men: 

The political correctness and reluctance to discuss these things absolutely does play a factor. A lot of police officers and other professions feel almost the best thing to do is try and avoid it for fear of being criticised. We probably have all got ourselves into a bit of state about this. The difficulty in the police service is that the whole thing is being closed down because we are all afraid of discussing any of it in case we say the wrong thing—and that is not healthy. 

With British authorities fantastically reluctant to accurately record data, we have to rely on our cousins across the pond to fill us in. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, per capita rates of black-on-white murders are approximately 10 times higher than white-on-black. That, in a nutshell, is why the media were reluctant to report on Iryna’s murder. 

As the late, great Charlie Kirk so eloquently put it:

There’s a deeper issue involved here, however, more than simply crime. The very heart of Western culture appears to be anti-white. I have written about this extensively in Banalysis: The Lie Destroying The West, but suffice it to say, whiteness, in and of itself, is now presented as a crime. The UK police consider it worth their while to ‘investigate’ posters reading “It’s okay to be white” and classify “White Lives Matter” as a hate crime. Even the English language itself has capitulated. The prefix ‘white’ is now almost exclusively pejorative (white privilege, white fragility, whitesplaining). And custodians of the language, like the Associated Press, refuse to capitalise ‘white’, despite affording ‘Black’ the privilege. Iryna, undoubtedly, paid a price for that too. 

While the liberal commercialisation of black ‘victimhood’ and vilification of whites is obviously causal, part of the blame for the capitulation of Western culture must be attributed to the lack of conservative pushback against this nonsense. Perhaps the tide is turning, but even if so—it’s been long overdue. 

Several questions now demand answers:

  • Why are we continually force-fed a gaslighting narrative of black victimhood, when the opposite is so clearly true?
  • Why are the lives of whites seen as little more than collateral damage compared to the rights of career criminals? 
  • Why is the cultural nirvana of ‘diversity’ only required in white countries? 
  • And how long can this disastrous pattern be allowed to continue?  

In the case of Iryna Zarutska, we will no doubt soon be hearing the deployment of the ‘mental health’ card in DeCarlos Brown’s defence. Of course, that may well be true. It’s funny though how the sufferers of this affliction are so systematic in the ‘random’ targets they select. 

europeanconservative

UK: Oxford Union Trust Secretary Resigns in Protest After President-Elect Glorifies Charlie Kirk Assassination

George Abaraonye (pictured) had previously served as the Oxford African and Caribbean Society’s vice-president | OXFORD ACS

The Honorary Secretary of the Oxford Literary and Debating Union Trust (OLDUT), the charity that owns the Oxford Union’s buildings and oversees its charitable responsibilities, has resigned in protest, citing the callous behavior of the Oxford Union’s President-Elect following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk in the United States.

The Secretary declared he could no longer remain in his role as the Union’s charitable overseer while its incoming leadership celebrates political violence and trustees refuse to intervene.

After news broke that Kirk had been shot, Oxford Union President-elect George Abaraonye allegedly wrote on Telegram, “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f*ing go,” according to The Telegraph.

The now-former Honorary Secretary did not mince words in his resignation letter, describing the President-Elect’s behavior as psychopathic and beyond shame, accusing him of glorifying political assassination and using the Union’s platform to enhance his personal brand through reckless attacks on institutions.

He warned that the Oxford Union is no longer experiencing isolated scandals but a paradigm shift, a weaponization of the Union itself against free speech, open debate, and Western democratic values.

The resigning officer, who also appears regularly in the media, cited concerns for his family’s safety after the President-Elect’s rhetoric, noting that his wife fears they may face violence as a result.

The letter reads:

“I write to you today regarding the behaviour of the Oxford Union’s President-Elect regarding the evil assassination of Charlie Kirk in the United States.

I am afraid that I do not see this as just another scandal that we need to encourage the Union to handle. I see this as existential. OLDUT’s delegate is about to be run by someone who gloried in the political assassination of a man whom he had debated in the Oxford Union chamber just months ago.

And instead of apologising, the President-Elect has doubled down, listing all the reasons why Mr Kirk was a terrible person with views so abhorrent that his murder was merely

‘ironic’. This is a psychopathic response from someone who has no intention of/or perhaps ability to, feel shame.

He will, like many recent Presidents, deliberately traduce and ruin the reputation of the Oxford Union to enhance his personal brand, one that involves attacking institutions like the one we are supposed to protect. This is actively different to the scandals of previous generations; then scandal was a bug or side effect. Now, it is the whole point. Mr Abaraonye will not be the last to try this.

This cannot be business as usual, and trustees need to understand the fundamental paradigm shift that has happened in the Union, the university, and the country. These people do not care about the Union; they never will. They do not care about free expression or open debate; they merely wear our precious freedoms as a costume until they can use them to attack that which is sacred to us. As it appears OLDUT is unwilling to act, I cannot in good conscience remain as the honorary secretary.

This is also personal to me; in a much smaller way I appear in the media talking about politics, and I already have a wife who is concerned that she or I will suffer violence as a result. I thereby resign as the Honorary Secretary of the Oxford Literary and Debating Union Trust. I hope this helps spur the wonderful trustees to realise the dangers we face.

I am so sorry to leave you in the lurch, and will of course hand over all of the various physical and digital documents, and conduct whatever handovers are necessary in good faith and to the best of my ability.

I will finish with the words of the President-Elect, whom it seems advocated for violent retaliation in our very chamber, feet away from where he had debated Charlie Kirk. This is the measure of the man we are not going to prevent from becoming President.

“At times, there is simply nothing else that can be required except for violent retaliation.

And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with; the view that some institutions are too broken, too oppressive to be reformed, like cancers of our society. And they must, and they should be taken down by any means necessary.””

English Conservative politician and a member of the House of Lords, Lord Moyland, also weighed in, stating, I’m an old President of the Oxford Union and I think he should resign now.”

The Oxford Union has since issued a statement condemning the remarks made by the president-elect.

“The Oxford Union would like to unequivocally condemn the reported words and sentiments expressed by the President-Elect, George Abaraonye, with regards to the passing of Charlie Kirk.

His reported views do not represent the Oxford Union’s current leadership or committee’s view. The current administration has, under President Moosa Harraj, no association with, and is entirely independent from, Mr Abaraonye’s administration.

In alignment with the statement published by our Society earlier today, we reaffirm our stance that the Oxford Union firmly opposes all forms of political violence and strongly stands by our commitment to free speech and considerate debate.

We would like to reiterate that our condolences lie with Charlie Kirk’s family, especially his wife and young children, who are enduring such terrible grief.”

However, Oxford University has confirmed that it will not be taking any action against George Abaraonye.

“Though Mr Abaraonye’s comments are abhorrent, they do not contravene the College’s policies on free speech, or any other relevant policy. Therefore, no disciplinary action will be taken.”

Here’s a clip of George Abaraonye, the incoming president of the Oxford Union, openly promoting political violence.

Here’s a video of Abaraonye debating Charlie Kirk on “toxic masculinity” at the Oxford Union in May while just wearing joggers, slippers and a t-shirt.

thegatewaypundit

Left-wing extremists on social media mock, celebrate Charlie Kirk’s death

Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 2.0)

More leftists have gone public with their hatred of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk and celebration of his death, an alarming number of whom hail from the education field.

Kirk, the head of campus outreach group Turning Point USA, was fatally shot Wednesday while speaking at an outdoor event at Utah Valley University. On Friday, authorities apprehended and accused 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson. Utah Republican Gov. Spencer Cox said Robinson viewed Kirk as someone “spreading hate.” Robinson’s ammunition was indeed inscribed with references to “fascists,” but early reports of messages related to transgenderism appear to be false.

While expressions of sympathy have come from all across the political spectrum, examples quickly spread across social media of left-wing voices celebrating Kirk’s death, suggesting he deserved it in some way, or otherwise making light of the murder. As LifeSite previously covered, MSNBC fired commentator Matthew Dowd for suggesting Kirk provoke the shooting with “hateful words.”

Since then, several additional examples have circulated.

On Thursday, DC Comics confirmed it was canceling a Batman spinoff comic titled Red Hood after its writer, “transgender” Gretchen Felker-Martin said on BlueSky, “Thoughts and prayers you Nazi b****” and “Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie Kirk.” The iconic entertainment brand said that while it puts “the highest value on our creators and community and affirm the right to peaceful, individual expression of personal viewpoints,” comments that “can be viewed as promoting hostility or violence are inconsistent with DC’s standards of conduct.”

Incoming Oxford Union president George Abaraonye, who had debated Kirk in the past, posted in a private student chat “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f***ing go,” and “Charlie Kirk got shot loool.” The outgoing administration of the English debating society condemned the remarks and stressed that the “current administration has, under President Moosa Harraj, no association with, and is entirely independent from, Mr Abaraonye’s administration.”

Middle Tennessee State University, meanwhile, fired assistant dean Laura Sosh-Lightsy after she posted on Facebook, “Looks like ol’ Charlie spoke his fate into existence. Hate begets hate. ZERO sympathy.” University president Sidney McPhee said the “comments by this employee, who worked in a position of trust directly with students, were inconsistent with our values and have undermined the university’s credibility and reputation with our students, faculty, staff and the community at large (…) We extend our deepest sympathies to the Kirk family.”

And at the University of Michigan, School of Education assistant professor Charles H.F. Davis posted on X, “Even if you believe violence isn’t the answer, it is a solution, especially to the violent conditions and violent rhetoric spewed by empowered people that create them.” He also reposted comments from others that Kirk was a “reminder of two things: your words don’t skip consequences, they just collect interest. And lastly, empathy has boundaries”; and that Kirk “spent his entire life disparaging immigrants, disrespecting women, and blaming black folks, only to get shot in one of the whitest places on earth.” In response, so far UMich has said only that it “does not take positions on matters not directly connected to university governance. Faculty members are free to speak and debate issues of the day; but, to be clear, those individual expressions do not represent the views of the university.”

Conservatives have long warned of the left-wing bias of modern academia. That several school officials, and not just students, celebrated Kirk’s death puts that longstanding grievance in especially grim perspective.

The White House sent Vice President JD Vance and his family to comfort Kirk’s family in Salt Lake City and allowed the use of Air Force Two to transport his casket. President Donald Trump has also announced he will posthumously award the conservative activist with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, one of the nation’s highest civilian honors.

lifesitenews

‘A minute silence for George Floyd but not for Charlie Kirk?’ — European Parliament leaders reject request to honor murdered US conservative, much to the joy of left-wing MEPs

Katarina Barley. Wikimedia Commons , Dr. Frank Gaeth, CC-BY-SA-4.0

Left-wing European lawmakers on Thursday refused to observe a moment of reflection for Charlie Kirk, the U.S. conservative activist shot dead during a college debate event in Utah on Wednesday, triggering a heated confrontation in the chamber in Strasbourg and leading to accusations of political bias.

The Neutered Satirist.

Swedish MEP Charlie Weimers, of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group, had emailed European Parliament President Roberta Metsola to propose a minute of silence for Kirk, describing the gesture as symbolic and aimed at defending “our right to freedom of speech.”

However, the request was rejected, with her spokesperson citing a bureaucratic rule that minutes of silence can only be declared at the opening of a plenary session, and as this session had started on Monday, he would have to wait until the next sitting in October.

Weimers was instead allowed to make a point of order before the voting session began. He opened by urging MEPs to “strongly condemn political violence and rhetoric that incites violence” and asked colleagues to “stand with me in a reflection of prayer in his honor.” When he tried to yield the remainder of his time for a silent tribute, the session’s chair, Katarina Barley of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D), cut him off.

“We have discussed this, and you know the president said no to a minute of silence,” Barley said as conservative MEPs banged their desks and shouted in protest. Centrist and left-wing members applauded and whistled at Barley’s intervention.

Hungarian MEP András László accused Barley of deliberately breaking the tribute: “The socialist chair deliberately started talking immediately.”

Weimers later said in a social media video: “I wanted to honor the memory of conservative activist Charlie Kirk by yielding my time for a moment of reflection prayer. Unfortunately, the Social Democratic deputy speaker did not want to have that.”

He captioned the clip: “How does holding a minute of silence for George Floyd but denying one for Charlie Kirk make sense?”

Polish MEP Dominik Tarczyński also lashed out, writing: “As conservatives, we requested a minute of silence in the European Parliament to honor Charlie Kirk. The left, calling themselves democrats, naturally refused. They are the same everywhere… Even in the face of death, they are incapable of showing human compassion. Therefore, I will organize an exhibition in the European Parliament commemorating Charlie Kirk. His legacy will bear fruit.”

Kirk was killed when a single shot was fired from a distance during a college debate event, striking him in the neck. He was rushed to hospital but did not survive.

rmx.news

The knife through Zarutska’s neck, the bullet through Kirk and anti-white racism

Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk: ‘Those who preach the belief that every white person is an oppressor are also the ones who branded Kirk as an extremist.’

A world where one is attacked, even murdered, because of the colour of one’s skin, is something we in the West are supposed to have left behind, right? Racial discrimination – at least of the negative kind – is unthinkable in our progressed societies. Or is it? Let us be blunt: Socially acceptable racism is still alive and killing. What has changed is the identity of those targeted. It is whites that are now in the crosshairs.

Iryna Zarutska’s killing chills. The 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee was stabbed to death in North Carolina on August 22 by Decarlos Brown Jr., a black man targeting “any white woman”. Brown, confessing a racial motive, stabbed her on a Charlotte train, yet major media ignored it for weeks, until the video came out. George Floyd’s 2020 death sparked 10,000 protests and $2 billion in damages. Why no outrage for Iryna?

This is a cultural phenomenon. The liberal agenda, steeped in narratives of collective white guilt for the West’s historical sins – slavery, colonialism – has woven a dangerous thread, casting whites as perpetual oppressors. This dogma, preached in academia and media, creates a theoretical license for radicals to justify violence as “revenge” against white people. From the French West Indian philosopher Frantz Fanon’s anti-colonial rhetoric to modern “decolonisation” seminars, this ideology, like a preacher inciting a mob, emboldens attacks, portraying whites as fair game for retribution.

Anti-white crimes pile up. FBI’s 2023 data logs 6,999 hate crimes against whites, 52.5 per cent of racial incidents. The examples are endless. A Michigan case of a black man threatening white co-workers racially was ignored by local media. A Texas mall shooting targeted white shoppers, but was downplayed as “random”. Numbers scream, elites stay silent.

Public spaces are no longer safe for whites. From 2020-2024, 1.5 million violent incidents occurred in public, with whites facing racial slurs and assaults, according to the FBI. A 2024 New York City subway attack on a white man drew no hate crime charges, despite racial taunts. “Systemic bias ignores white victims”, noted criminologist John Hagan speaking to The Guardian last year. Courts in most cases do dismiss such cases.

Schools have become warzones. White students faced 68 per cent of racial bullying incidents in 2023, according to the US Department of Education, yet the media rarely report them. When in a California school white teens were attacked with racial slurs, no suspensions were issued. Schools with over 50 per cent non-white students reported 70 per cent of violent incidents targeting whites, say 2024 numbers. Silence from teachers and principals encourages attackers.

Workplaces echo this trend. In a recent Boston case, a white employee was racially harassed, yet HR dismissed it. LA County’s 2024 report flagged 74 white supremacist incidents but ignored anti-white harassment. “White victims don’t fit the narrative,” tweeted VigilantFox on X. Spot on. Employers, like prosecutors rigging verdicts, turn a blind eye.

Media double standards are blatant. Racism against blacks is always headline news. Racism against whites is simply ignored. According to the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), white victims like Zarutska are four times less likely to get tributes than black victims. Floyd’s death fuelled global BLM marches amidst media frenzy. Zarutska’s was initially only covered by Fox News and Ukrainian media.

Politicians mirror this apathy. Biden and Harris led Floyd vigils. Not even a word for Zarutska. No leader mourned her when she was killed. California’s Gavin Newsom ignored a 2024 anti-white school attack in Sacramento, while condemning “systemic racism” elsewhere. In Europe, Germany’s Olaf Scholz sidestepped a 2024 Berlin white pedestrian attack – no statement from the EU either. Deaf, dumb and blind is the name of the game. Hear no evil, see no evil.

And the purge escalates. A few hours before these lines were published, Charlie Kirk was shot dead. Zarutska’s death had already infuriated millions out of their passiveness. Now the killing of another martyr only deepens the rage. Those who preach the belief that every white person is an oppressor, are also the ones who branded Kirk as an extremist. With them, we are now at war, in a fight for survival.

brusselssignal

Another Victim of Multiculturalism: French Woman Killed by Afghan Ex

The Town Hall in Poitiers, France
By Robin Poitou – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=28377852

A 25-year-old woman was stabbed multiple times on Monday, September 8th, in her home in Poitiers, France, and later died from her injuries. The prime suspect is the young woman’s former partner, a political refugee from Afghanistan who was residing in France legally.

Le Figaro reports that the 35-year-old Afghan is still on the run. The woman, who has been identified as “Inès,” had filed five complaints with the police for harassment before she was killed.

In a press release on Thursday, September 11th, the Poitiers prosecutor’s office confirmed that the victim had first filed a complaint on July 10th for harassment by a spouse or partner, intentional violence by a spouse or partner, and sexual offenses. “The victim subsequently renewed her concerns by filing additional complaints with the police four times, on July 17, August 13, August 19, and August 28,” prosecutor Rachel Bray added.

According to French media, the victim was part of an association helping migrants, in particular with administrative procedures. Her family told Le Figaro that it was through this association that she met the man who would later kill her. Inès broke up with her partner in April, but he was unwilling to accept her decision and started following and harassing the young woman on the street, at work, and at home.

Inès’s relatives blame the police for what happened, saying that they “did not take seriously” her complaints. Her brother Yacine told Le Figaro: “Our fight is not only against the man who killed her, but also against the system.” 

She filed a complaint several times, and nothing was done. For me, there are two culprits: the police and the individual.

europeanconservative