UK PM Keir Starmer now says migrants should learn English — after arresting Brits for hate speech for saying the same thing

By Monica Showalter

It’s amazing how hypocritical the U.K. Labour left can get when its polling goes into the toilet.

Out of the blue, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer tweeted this:

If you want to live in the UK, you should speak English. That’s common sense.

So we’re raising English language requirements across every main immigration route.— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) May 12, 2025

Common sense? Then why hasn’t Labour embraced it until now? Seems this might have something to do with it, from Statista:

As of May 5, 2025, the net approval rating of the Labour government in the United Kingdom stood at -52 percent, one of the lowest approval ratings for the current government.

Al Jazeera was even more specific in its headline:

UK Labour government toughens immigration plans as far right gains support

It was part of a broader speech against illegal immigration:

Holy. Shit.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer says the UK is becoming an “island of strangers”

“The current system is contributing to forces that are slowly pulling our country apart. I believe we need to reduce immigration, significantly.”

Pendulum is swinging across the West. pic.twitter.com/s33R7iFU66— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) May 12, 2025

And many Brits are baffled:

Who is this and what have they done with the real @Keir_Starmer ?

Whoever this is wants to curb mass migration in Great Britain

‘We risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”

pic.twitter.com/2t7Bem7QQD— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) May 12, 2025

Others weren’t, mocking the whole picture for its hypocrisy.

“Speak English”?

That’s literally a hate crime in your tyrannical fascist hell-hole, jackass.

Off to jail for you!

Bigot! pic.twitter.com/bVbvIMeAYz— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) May 12, 2025

Sensing electoral oblivion Gear Starmer decides to take the bold step of suggesting that people who live, work, claim benefits and use the NHS in our country should actually speak the English language. https://t.co/PZvi7ZzLAT pic.twitter.com/0Bq3hOQI5K— Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) May 12, 2025

Still others noted that he was late to the party — another example of his hypocrisy:

‘We risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”
– Keir Starmer.

This was London the day after October 7th massacre by Hamas. Before Israel had even retaliated.

We already are an island of strangers. These people are certainly alien to me. pic.twitter.com/9S5AlziUCZ— Chris Rose (@ArchRose90) May 12, 2025

Here’s how flexibly Starmer changes his tune:

Keir Starmer, 2020: We need to make a wider case on immigration. We welcome migrants, not scapegoat them.

Keir Starmer, 2025: We have an immigration system designed to permit abuse. This needs to end!

Another reminder that this man has no principles.

pic.twitter.com/FVv10sRq6u— Chris Rose (@ArchRose90) May 12, 2025

Mickey Kaus found someone who brings the receipts on the fact that he is lying:

Matt Goodwin is deeply, deeply skeptical of Keir Starmer’s new tough talk on immigration, and has the history (including numbers) that support disbelief https://t.co/lYl2qPzDm3— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) May 12, 2025

Meanwhile, English-schminglish, the migrant flow continues:

Whilst @Keir_Starmer was making promises he can’t keep in London, here were the scenes in Calais and Dover this morning. pic.twitter.com/7elJ0C2tDd— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) May 12, 2025

What a miserable picture. My money’s on a resounding defeat for the wretched Labour Party.

americanthinker

‘Peacemaker-in-Chief’ — British Peer Calls for Trump to Be Awarded Nobel Peace Prize for Preventing India-Pakistan War

Wikimedia Commons, Gage Skidmore, CC-BY-SA-2.0

A member of the House of Lords has called on the British government to nominate U.S. President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to prevent a war between India and Pakistan.

Lord Sarfraz, a Pakistani-heritage businessman and Conservative politician, submitted a formal request on Monday that Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer’s government nominate President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize “in recognition for his instrumental role in averting a full-scale war between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.”

“India and Pakistan were at the brink – once again – but like never before. The nuclear-armed neighbours had just participated in one of the most prolific aerial combat events of recent time, involving over 125 fighter jets. Multiple missiles had been launched deep inside each other’s territory. Civilian casualties were mounting. Critical assets were being destroyed. Temperatures were very high,” he wrote in a statement seen by Breitbart London.

“Without President Trump’s direct efforts, a ceasefire would not have been possible. The consequences of further escalation could have been devastating for the region and the world. Whatever one’s political views, the President has been Peacemaker-In-Chief during this conflict.”

Lord Sarfraz was elevated to the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in 2020 after being nominated by Boris Johnson for a life peerage in his Dissolution Honours List. This is opposed to Lords who inherited their seat in the House, as was typically the case before reforms instituted by the left-wing Labour government of Tony Blair in 1999, which greatly reduced the number of hereditary peers.

A member of the Parliament’s Joint Committee for National Security Strategy, Baron Sarfraz vowed to work on improving relations between the United Kingdom and Pakistan upon joining the House of Lords.

It is not the first time that President Trump would have been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. During his first term in office, President Trump received multiple nominations, including for his first administration’s efforts to broker the historic Abraham Accords, which normalised relations between several Muslim states and Israel.

President Trump was also previously nominated for his peace efforts in the conflicts between North and South Korea and between Serbia and Kosovo during his first term. However, the Nobel Committee, appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, has so far shot down all efforts to grant the U.S. leader the esteemed peace prize.

The Nobel Committee was criticised for awarding former U.S. President Barack Obama the prize in 2009 before he came into office. In 2015, the former head of the committee, Geir Lundestad, expressed regret for the award, saying that “even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake.”

In his 2020 memoirs, President Obama recounted being informed that he had won the prize from his then-advisor Robert Gibbs, to which he replied, “For what?”

breitbart

‘A complete surrender’ – US pressure may have forced Germany to drop surveillance on right-wing AfD party

Alice Weidel, Photo: AfD

Germany’s domestic spy agency has suspended authoritarian surveillance methods of the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and U.S. pressure may have played a role.

The German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), the country’s powerful domestic spy agency, had labeled the AfD a “confirmed far-right organization” before suspending this designation last week. The main reason presented was that the AfD is appealing the designation in court and the agency would wait until this appeal is concluded to decide whether to keep the designation.

However, Germany’s ally, the United States, immediately criticized the designation in some of the harshest language possible, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling it “tyranny in disguise.” That was not all, though. U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the powerful U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, then asked Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (DNI) to suspend intelligence cooperation between the United States and Germany.

According to Cotton, the German authorities’ politically motivated surveillance activities resemble methods used by dictatorships that are unbecoming of a democratic ally.

“Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground,” he wrote.

This would have represented a drastic break between the two allies and even a threat to Germany’s national security, which raised the stakes in Germany’s authoritarian move to stifle the political opposition. Currently, the AfD is the largest opposition party in the country and for the first time ever, polled in first place last month.

The developments have also caused a major stir in Germany. Alice Weidel, co-chair of the AfD, said American pressure was behind the BfV’s withdrawal of its designation label on the AfD. In addition, Joachim Steinhöfel, a lawyer defending freedom of speech, told NIUS that the move by the BfV is “a complete surrender by the German domestic intelligence service.” He also noted that U.S. influence was vital.

“We also have to thank the Americans for exerting massive pressure,” he added.

Germany often relies on external partners to spy on its own citizens, as Germany features very strict privacy laws. The NSA is thought to be especially active watching Germans. As a result, any U.S. withdrawal from intelligence sharing could have been disastrous for Germany.

The temporary removal of the designation was warmly welcomed by the AfD, as it gives the party breathing room. For one, a vote on the ban of the party has little chance of moving forward without the designation. Second, the designation offered the BfV the legal means to surveil the entire party and its membership without a warrant, including reading emails and chats, as well as flood the party with informants.

Now, German intelligence is being forced to rethink its surveillance policy as political divisions grow. However, if the appeal court agrees with the BfV that the AfD can be labeled right-wing extremist, the same issue may rear its head again. It is unclear how long this appeals process will take, whether months or even years; however, there is a growing chorus from Germany’s left, as well as the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), to ban the entire AfD party.

If that happens, tensions between the U.S. and Germany could soar to new heights.

rmx

Muslim Viennese state teacher teaches her pupils ‘Christians and non-believers are all going to hell’

Screen grab youtube

Today, 42 per cent of primary school children in Vienna come from a Muslim culture. In a few years, they will make up the majority of the total population in Vienna. However, time and again it becomes apparent that these cultures are not compatible with European cultures.
The children in Vienna-Favoriten are currently suffering from this. An Afghan girl there is said to have demanded: ‘All Christians should die’. A teacher reported this to the Kronen Zeitung newspaper. Another teacher, paid by the Austrian state, is said to have declared at the school:

'Muslims choose whether they go to paradise or hell. Christians and non-believers all go to hell.

‘These are the conditions in our schools with which we teachers are largely left alone,’ said the teacher, who did not want to give his full name for fear of political repression.
He also addressed the blatant differences in performance between cultures:

Due to repetitions and reclassifications due to insufficient German language skills, there are age differences of up to three years in one school level.

This leads to large differences in level within the classes, some are not challenged enough and a large number are completely overstretched.
FPÖ education spokesman Hermann Brückl summarises the political dimension in another recent case:

'The latest reports on conditions at Viennese compulsory schools really only allow one conclusion to be drawn: integration in Vienna has failed.

The politicians responsible have known this for years and have in fact long since capitulated, said Brückl in connection with the recent reports of corporal punishment in a Viennese ‘backyard Koran school’. He is calling for a fundamental paradigm shift, otherwise Vienna as a centre of education in the area of compulsory schools will be lost for good, said Brückl.

unzensuriert

Anti-Semitic protests mar Eurovision song contest kickoff

Israeli singer Yuval Raphael at the ESC parade in Basel with protesters in the crowd. Screengrab youtube

Protesters demanding Israel be excluded from Eurovision overshadowed the 2025 song contest’s May 11 opening parade in Basel, Switzerland.

As Swiss officials gave their welcoming speeches, several dozen activists who had infiltrated the crowd waved Palestinian flags and attempted to drown out Conradin Cramer, president of Basel’s city council, with boos and shouts of “shame on you”.

The protesters demanded Israel be barred from the contest taking place between May 13 and May 17 in the city in northwest Switzerland.

The chants reached a climax when Yuval Raphael and other members of the Israeli delegation stepped onto the event’s turquoise carpet, where participants traditionally pass during the opening parade.

Raphael is a survivor of the October 7 attack on the Nova music festival in Israel, in which the Palestinian terror organisation Hamas killed 378 young Israelis.

A 25-year-old man holding a Palestinian flag and wearing Palestinian headgear walked alongside the Israeli guests for a while, making “throat-cutting” gestures at them.

According to The Times of Israel, the man was later reported to police.

Both the public and participants were reportedly taken aback by the protests, while Basel police stood back and did not intervene.

Police, who had not given approval for the demonstration, only acted when protesters blocked tram rails.

City president Cramer told Swiss broadcaster SRF, “We have made freedom of opinion possible. That is also part of Switzerland. And at the same time, it has not spoilt the joy about this festival, uniting nations here in Basel.”

Not everybody drew such positive conclusions however.

Andrea Schuhmacher from local newspaper BaZ wrote, “Basel did not present a good picture during the ESC parade.” She also criticised city officials for allowing activists to “hijack the parade”, while at the same time banning a demonstration against antisemitism.

On May 10, Basel police declined to issue a permit for a standing demonstration on the topic of “antisemitism surrounding ESC” on the central Claraplatz.

The officials said the proposed protests could “could pose a concrete threat to public safety and order” and would cause “disproportionate work for the security forces”.

Previously, Swiss singer Nemo – who won the contest for Switzerland in 2024 – called for a ban of Israel from the song contest, saying “the state’s actions would contravene ESC values”.

The non-binary singer’s remarks were greeted by disdain from many commentators.

Claudio Zanetti, a former Swiss MP, wrote on X: “Nemo is not a likeable, colourful bird. He is a disgusting, left-wing anti-Semite.”

brusselssignal

Cocaine? Macron Suffers Embarrassing Moment During Train Ride Into Ukraine (VIDEO)

Macron and Starmer on train into Ukraine/ screen image

French President Emmanuel Macron suffered an embarrassing moment during a train ride into Ukraine on Sunday.

Reporters filmed Macron during a train ride from Poland to Ukraine with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

The three leaders are on their way to Kiev to discuss the ongoing war with Russia and potential peace talks.

Rumors quickly began to spread that Macron possessed cocaine after he quickly grabbed a crumpled-up tissue. Others speculated that Merz tried to cover a straw or a spoon.

WATCH:

French media pushed back on the rumors and said Macron grabbed a handkerchief off the table.

“There is nothing suspicious in the video,” French outlet Libération said, calling speculation that it was a bag of cocaine “conspiracy theories.”

Macron erlebt peinlichen Moment während Zugfahrt in die Ukraine (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | von Cristina Laila

Following this news story, Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova was quick to respond to the news.

Maria Zakharova: The video shows the President of France, the Prime Minister of Britain and the Chancellor of Germany.

Having pushed Zelensky into yet another hellish intrigue to disrupt the settlement and continue the bloodshed in Europe, as in the joke, the Frenchman, the Englishman and the German got on the train and… blew.

Apparently, so much that they forgot to put away their paraphernalia (a bag and a spoon) before the journalists arrived.

The fate of Europe is being decided in every sense by dependent temporary workers.

Incredible footage. As if the Almighty himself is lifting the curtain of this stinking Sabbath to the world, so that “those who have eyes to see.”

In 2022, I asked one Western ambassador: “How can you supply weapons to the unbalanced drug addict Zelensky, he has been on cocaine for many years?” And I received the answer: “For the EU, this is normal – many heads of Western states use it.”

Apparently, Zakharova is not buying the “tissue and coffee cup” line that was given by the Western warmonger elites.

Die russische Sprecherin Maria Sacharowa reagiert auf den „Taschentuch“-Vorfall zwischen Macron, Merz und Starmer im Zug – und sie glaubt es nicht | The Gateway Pundit | von Jim Hoft

Does the Western Suit Erase the Islamic Sword? The West falls for the Jihadist playbook – every time

French President Emmanuel Macron just welcomed Ahmed al-Sharaa to Paris—a man better known to the world as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, the former commander of al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate and the founding leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). The same HTS that ruled through terror, imposed Sharia with the sword, ran torture prisons, and publicly executed civilians.

Macron’s administration, under the pretext of “regional diplomacy,” is now treating a lifelong jihadist as a statesman—just months before France prepares to commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the November 13, 2015 ISIS attacks that left 130 innocent people dead in the heart of Paris.

Let that sink in: the President of the French Republic brought a jihadist leader into the same city where the Bataclan massacre and Stade de France bombings were carried out by his ideological cousins.

And the West yawns.

From Bin Laden to a Business Suit: The Jihadist-Makeover Playbook

Ahmed al-Sharaa isn’t some misunderstood rebel leader. He is the polished face of a long-running Jihadist strategy: trade the Kalashnikov for a suit, soften the beard, smile for Western media cameras, and wait for the invitations to state dinners. Jolani—under that name—was sanctioned by the U.S. State Department in 2013 with a $10 million reward for information leading to his capture. His group HTS is responsible for mass killings of Syrian minorities, enforcement of Taliban-style Sharia, and targeting journalists and aid workers. None of this has changed. Only the optics have.

This isn’t the first time the West has fallen for the “moderate jihadist” illusion. In 1979, Jimmy Carter’s State Department applauded the Islamic Revolution in Iran as a liberation movement. Khomeini was sold to the American public as a spiritual leader yearning for freedom. Within months, Tehran was executing homosexuals, imprisoning dissidents, and enforcing compulsory hijab under penalty of lashes.

In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood—long banned as a subversive Islamist movement—briefly ascended to power in 2012 with Western backing. The result? A year of constitutional chaos, Sharia creep, and mass persecution of Coptic Christians before a popular revolt ended the farce.

The West never learns. If a jihadist figures out how to hold a press conference without yelling “Allahu Akbar,” they get a seat at the table.

Meanwhile, Republicans are Trying to “Fix” Syria

Not to be outdone in geopolitical idiocy, two Republican U.S. House members—Ben Cline and Scott Perry—recently traveled to Syria as part of a “fact-finding” mission, discussing reconstruction and calling for a reevaluation of sanctions. Photos emerged of smiling handshakes with Syrian officials under banners that scream “Make Syria Great Again.” The message is unmistakable: the American right is flirting with the same dangerous delusion as Macron—that Islamic strongmen can be managed, negotiated with, or somehow Westernized.

Their visit took place in the very region now controlled by the same networks that previously pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda and later flirted with ISIS. The notion that Syria’s post-Assad “stability” is in the hands of secular reformers is not just incorrect—it’s criminally naïve. These men aren’t post-Jihadists. They’re post-camouflage. Their ideology hasn’t changed. Only the tactics have.

1400 Years, Same Doctrine, Same Pattern

This isn’t about France or Syria or Republicans. This is about the West’s refusal to acknowledge the nature of the threat. Islam’s doctrine of conquest—codified in the Quran, practiced by Muhammad, and enforced across empires—has not changed since the Hijrah to Medina in 622 AD. The objective remains what it always has been: submission. Whether through terror, migration, lawfare, or diplomacy, the endgame is the same.

The Ottoman Empire used diplomatic recognition by France and Britain in the 1800s to secure trade and status—while still beheading apostates, enslaving women from the Balkans, and crushing Armenians. Tunisia’s reformist façade in the early 2000s masked deep Islamist networks later activated in the Arab Spring. In Europe today, Islamic enclaves across Sweden, France, and Germany operate under informal Sharia with authorities too cowardly to intervene. And still, leaders pretend that each new “moderate” is different—that maybe this one will abandon 14 centuries of religious imperialism for a shot at liberal democracy.

Islam doesn’t reform. It expands. It infiltrates. And when the timing is right, it dominates.

This Isn’t Diplomacy. It’s Surrender.

Macron’s meeting with Ahmed al-Sharaa wasn’t a diplomatic triumph—it was an ideological surrender. A willing embrace of a sanitized jihad. A photo-op that spits on the graves of the victims of the Bataclan, Charlie Hebdo, and Nice. It proves that in 2025, the West is still committed to losing the war it refuses to name.

And the American right isn’t far behind. If Republicans can be suckered into extending olive branches to jihadists in Damascus under the illusion of “realpolitik,” then the rot has spread far deeper than the halls of the Élysée Palace.

History is clear. Every time the West believes it can outsmart, moderate, or accommodate Islam, it ends in blood.

It happened in Tours in 732, in Constantinople in 1453, in Tehran in 1979, and in New York City on 9/11.

And unless we wake up, it will happen again—only this time, we’ll have invited it in, smiling, with handshakes and red carpets.

frontpagemag

Speech and self-defense are dead letters in England

By Andrea Widburg

Just yesterday, I wrote about Britain’s decline as its embrace of unlimited immigration from Third World (mostly Muslim) countries and its commitment to the insane Net Zero carbon dioxide metric are leading it toward a Muslim-controlled polity and a pre-modern energy infrastructure. Today, I awoke to two more reports about Britain’s decline, this time related to speech and self-defense. These reports matter because the leftist British approach to governance is what the Democrat party desperately wants to see in America.

The first story comes from The Telegraph, Britain’s (slightly) right-of-center outlet, and its title says it all: “Retired police officer arrested over ‘thought crime’ tweet.” Julian Foulkes’s thought crime was that he tweeted about his concern regarding rising antisemitism in Britain, as seen with leftist and Muslim support for Hamas and demonization of Israel.

Screen grab from police body cam, via The Telegraph.

Nor was Foulkes merely arrested. The police searched his home from top to bottom, viewing with concern his pro-liberty literature and pawing through the cuttings he’d collected following his daughter’s death at the hands of a drunk driver:

A retired special constable was arrested and detained over a social media post warning about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain, The Telegraph can reveal.

Julian Foulkes, from Gillingham in Kent, was handcuffed at his home by six officers from Kent Police – the force he had served for a decade – after challenging a supporter of pro-Palestinian marches on X.

Police body-worn camera footage captured officers scrutinising the 71-year-old’s collection of books by authors such as Douglas Murray, a Telegraph contributor, and issues of The Spectator, pointing to what they described as “very Brexity things”.

They were also shown raising concerns about a shopping list containing bleach, tin foil and gloves drawn up by Mr Foulkes’s wife, a hairdresser.

This is what’s happening in the country that gave our Founders the entire concept of free speech and freedom of conscience. It’s dead in Britain, because free speech sees ordinary British people challenging the Islamic ethos that is slowly overtaking their country. Islam, of course, rightly means “submission.” There is no room for free thought, speech, or action in a Muslim country.

The British Home Office pointed out that what happened took place in November 2023, under a different government (Rushi Sunak’s sort-of conservative one), so it shouldn’t be held against the current government…which sounds good, until you realize that the current government is even more radicalized and pro-Islam than the past one was.

I’m normally very respectful of giving links only to an official site, even if it’s behind a paywall, because these sites need money to pay the bills. However, this article is so shocking and horrible, and the footage so disturbing, that I’ll share with you a link to read the article and view the video in case it is behind a paywall.

Also in Britain, the land that gave us the idea of self-defense, it seems that a woman just had reaffirmed her 30-year sentence for stabbing to death a man who was sexually assaulting her:

Nor was Foulkes merely arrested. The police searched his home from top to bottom, viewing with concern his pro-liberty literature and pawing through the cuttings he’d collected following his daughter’s death at the hands of a drunk driver:

A retired special constable was arrested and detained over a social media post warning about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain, The Telegraph can reveal.

Julian Foulkes, from Gillingham in Kent, was handcuffed at his home by six officers from Kent Police – the force he had served for a decade – after challenging a supporter of pro-Palestinian marches on X.

Police body-worn camera footage captured officers scrutinising the 71-year-old’s collection of books by authors such as Douglas Murray, a Telegraph contributor, and issues of The Spectator, pointing to what they described as “very Brexity things”.

They were also shown raising concerns about a shopping list containing bleach, tin foil and gloves drawn up by Mr Foulkes’s wife, a hairdresser.

This is what’s happening in the country that gave our Founders the entire concept of free speech and freedom of conscience. It’s dead in Britain, because free speech sees ordinary British people challenging the Islamic ethos that is slowly overtaking their country. Islam, of course, rightly means “submission.” There is no room for free thought, speech, or action in a Muslim country.

The British Home Office pointed out that what happened took place in November 2023, under a different government (Rushi Sunak’s sort-of conservative one), so it shouldn’t be held against the current government…which sounds good, until you realize that the current government is even more radicalized and pro-Islam than the past one was.

I’m normally very respectful of giving links only to an official site, even if it’s behind a paywall, because these sites need money to pay the bills. However, this article is so shocking and horrible, and the footage so disturbing, that I’ll share with you a link to read the article and view the video in case it is behind a paywall.

Also in Britain, the land that gave us the idea of self-defense, it seems that a woman just had reaffirmed her 30-year sentence for stabbing to death a man who was sexually assaulting her:

The details of what happened to her show that, while Ogonowska made poor decisions to begin with, at the moment she stabbed Filip Jaskiewicz, she had already made futile attempts to escape his grabbing and otherwise controlling her.

It’s important to note here that the flip side of this case is that Jaskiewicz was getting grabby, but not rapey, when she stabbed him and that the jurors didn’t believe Ogonowska’s unsupported testimony that she’d been traumatized by a previous rape.

It seems that Ogonowska’s real sin was in having a knife in the first place. After all, the UK is a place where even the knives one uses to slide peas around are illegal if carried in public.

It’s a lot easier to control behavior than it is to address Britain’s moral failings, many of which stem from the massive influx of people from violent, but politically correct Third World countries, along with the pass that its leftist government gives to violent immigrants. Thus, the judge explicitly stated that what happened wasn’t self-defense because Ogonowska had a knife on her.

The British are outraged by the sentence, especially because just last month, Banaras Hussain, a man who raped and tortured over a dozen children for years walked free after serving less than half his prison sentence:

At the end of the day, the outrage over Ogonowska’s sentence has less to do with the possibly debatable facts of her case and a lot more to do with the British people’s sense that they are losing their country. The law has disarmed them in defiance of a thousand years of British history and the Bill of Rights of 1689, while being singularly accommodating to immigrants who quite literally rape and torture their children. Moreover, these anguished Brits had better be darn careful about speaking of these issues, or they could find six police at their door, arresting them, and pawing through all of their possessions.

And just remember, this is the dream that Democrats have for you.

americanthinker

France: 10 Muslims storm the church service in Avignon, shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ and threaten to burn down the church

I’m disgusted,” murmurs a regular at the Café des Négociants opposite Montfavet church. ‘When I imagine that it was young people who did that …’ comments the older man. In this district of Avignon, the public response to Father Laurent Milan’s abuse on Saturday evening, May 10, spread like wildfire. On Sunday morning, at the time of mass, the police car, which had been positioned in the square as a precaution, did not go unnoticed by the faithful.
[…]


According to the testimony of the priest, which was confirmed by the testimony of one of the witnesses present, the situation escalated as soon as the ten young people, aged around 15-20, entered the premises. ‘One of them started running around, others grouped around the priest, shouting insults,’ explains Isabelle, who was present with her husband after the night mass. ‘We all had a hard time getting them out,’ admits the art restorer.

They didn’t insult me personally, they just provoked me and made insulting remarks against the Catholic religion such as ‘Jesus, we’re fucking you’. According to the priest, who says the perpetrators shouted “allah akbar”, they repeated “several times”: “We will come back and burn down your church,” reports Father Milan, who is still in shock.

La Provence

Failure of justice in the name of Sharia: acquittal despite 140 cases of rape in Germany

AI

A Syrian man, now 30 years old, married a 15-year-old girl in an Islamic ceremony in 2022 – he has now been acquitted of 140 counts of rape. Don’t forget: as soon as this person receives a German passport, he is just as culturally and otherwise connected to you as the other Germans. Anyone who speaks about this or writes something like this is considered a right-wing extremist. By the way: the public prosecutor’s office is now examining whether proceedings will be initiated against the now 18-year-old victim.

A now 30-year-old Syrian man accused of over 140 counts of rape against a girl who was just 15 years old when the assaults started was acquitted by Krefeld District Court. The inconceivable justification: it was an ‘Islamic marriage’. In plain language, this means that a religiously motivated child marriage is accepted by a German court as legitimisation for systematic rape.

The accused had ‘married’ the girl – his cousin – in Lebanon and repeatedly sexually abused her over a period of two years. The public prosecutor’s office assumed that the rapes were serious and persistent.

The alleged victim had noted the incidents in a diary. However, the court did not follow her testimony. A psychiatric expert categorised her statements as implausible and inconsistent. The presiding judge referred to chat histories and pictures: ‘I miss you, I kiss your hands and feet’, she is said to have written to the 30-year-old defendant. The court considered this to be evidence of a voluntary relationship. The fact that she was only 15 years old at the time of the marriage – and her husband almost twice as old – was irrelevant to the court.

Also on trial was a 39-year-old Syrian man, who was also charged with deprivation of liberty, assault and coercion. Both defendants denied all charges. Their defence lawyers spoke of a fabricated story. The background was a family dispute between two Syrian clans. The 30-year-old described the relationship as loving and consensual. The engagement is said to have been celebrated in Syria as early as 2021 – at a time when the girl was 14 or 15 years old.

Just strange: the public prosecutor’s office is now examining whether proceedings will be initiated against the now 18-year-old girl – for false suspicion and unsworn false testimony.

This is not the first time that German courts have caved in to so-called ‘child marriages’. Legislators are partly to blame. The law passed in 2017 to combat child marriages was overturned by the Federal Constitutional Court in 2023 under the Islam-devout traffic light regime because it was allegedly too sweeping. Since then, there has been a legal vacuum in which ‘marriages’ with minors from ‘certain cultural backgrounds’ are de facto tolerated, almost protected.

journalistenwatch