Allah's Willing Executioners

The predominantly Muslim child rape grooming gangs likely trafficked “countless” British women and girls to their native Pakistan to serve as sex slaves, the head of the independent rape gang inquiry has said.

MP Rupert Lowe, who launched an independent inquiry into the mass child rape that occurred throughout England at the hands of clans of mostly Pakistani Muslim men, has called on the government to launch an investigation into cases of missing girls in grooming areas to determine whether they may have been trafficked to Pakistan as sex slaves.

The inquiry, which began in London last week, heard testimony from rape gang survivors that their abusers had attempted to take them to Pakistan. One victim told the inquiry: “They said they wanted to take me back to meet their families. So luckily I didn’t have a passport, otherwise I might not be sat here right now.”

Lowe said that multiple witness statements have stated that sexually abused girls were being trafficked to Pakistan and elsewhere by their rapists.

“I believe there are currently countless British women being used as sex slaves overseas. This may sound insane. It is not. Look at these gangs. Nobody would have believed the extent of the evil before it was uncovered. This is very real,” the Greater Yarmouth MP said.

“Our inquiry believes that this is the current reality for a terrifying number of women,” Lowe added.

The claims fall in line with previous disclosures detailing the modus operandi of grooming gangs, which have been frequently accused of trafficking girls to other cities in England to be abused by other members of their vast networks.

One victim told the Lowe inquiry: “There’s a very big network. It’s in Derby, Birmingham, there’s Sheffield, there’s Newcastle, there’s Leeds, there’s Barnsley. So you’d get taken to, say, Burton, and then he’d take you to a house, and then they’d send men in, like a conveyor belt.”

Victims appearing before the inquiry have also testified to the racial and religious element to the sexual abuse, in which mostly Pakistani Muslim men preyed specifically on white working-class girls, as they were seen as lesser than their Muslim counterparts.

One survivor, who said that she was victimised by “mainly Pakistani” men, told the panel: “They used to, like, tell me things about the good angel and the bad angel that I’ve been, like, kind of possessed. And they’ve got to punish me to get the badness out of me.

“That’s why they have to rape me and do all this stuff to me, to get the badness out of me. I’ve got to be punished. Yeah. And it was just all kind of stuff like that. The words they say to you, you’re ‘gora, like white trash and white skin.”

Another recounted an instance in which she was taken to the “party house” during the Islamic holiday of Eid, and one of her abusers said that his “relatives were coming from Birmingham to celebrate Eid and they were expecting girls to be waiting here for them.”

The victims, some of whom said that they were abused by hundreds of men, also stressed that the abuse extended far beyond rape, with some telling the inquiry of being drugged, beaten, and having guns put to their heads.

“I’ve had a knife at my throat because he wanted me to ‘sort out’ 10, 15 cars full of men. I’d get kidnapped. I don’t think people realise, I think they think it’s rape, but it was torture as well. I’d be kidnapped and I’d be locked in a room. And I’d be beaten. I’d be told if I don’t do this, I’m not going to go home. So it was a lot more than just rape,” one said.

Local authorities, notably the police and NHS, were also accused in the victim testimonies of being either complicit or at least serving to cover up the crimes committed by the rape gangs. Previous reports have long found that police, social workers, and other local authorities frequently overlooked the atrocities committed by grooming gangs for fear of appearing racist or stoking racial tensions.

One survivor told the Rape Gang Inquiry: “The police didn’t do anything last time. I told them that it was essentially forced. And they smirked at me in my own home and left. So, I mean… there was no evidence that they were going to do anything different, that they were going to actually support us.”

Another said that healthcare workers at the National Health Service failed to take any action after she came in with sexually transmitted diseases at the age of 13 and later with a miscarriage.

Commenting on the alleged complicity, Rupert Lowe said: “I want to see senior police officers in prison. With the evidence we are collecting, there is simply no way hundreds of men and women right at the top of their forces were not aware of the rapes. Hundreds, if not more. Politicians, police, council officials, NHS, social care – all of them.

“If they knew and did nothing, they shouldn’t just be sacked, they should be prosecuted. A lot of people need to go to prison.”

breitbart

Governing elites in Europe, in what increasingly appears to be the EUSSR (European Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) race to the bottom, have been growing ever more unpopular. Disapproval ratings are skyrocketing. In France, 77% of the public disapprove of President Emmanuel Macron. In Britain, 68% disapprove of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In Germany, 64% disapprove of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and in Spain, 61% have had it up to here with Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez.

In other parts of Europe, such as Germany and France, all sorts of pseudo-legal acrobatics are being generated to prevent political opponents from running for high office (such as here and here).

So, if you are an unpopular regime desperately clinging to power, what do you do? It’s easy! Iran’s ayatollahs, China’s Xi Jinping, Russia’s Vladimir Lenin, Josef Stalin and Vladimir Putin could tell you. You simply crack down — more than ever — on free speech and dissent!

In supposed democracies, this latest “benefit ” to your people – cracking down on dissent “democratically” — means using technology rather than firepower to crush freedom of speech.

Concerning age limits for children, there is a valid argument to be made that leaving the faces of a generation staring at screens all day appears to be impairing not only their education but also their ability to socialize with anyone not an AI chimera, algorithmed to agree narcotically with everything uploaded, including the best ways to how to put their young, ostensibly deficient lives to an end.

As the founder and CEO of Telegram, Pavel Durov wrote on X:

Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert:

Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy:

1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics….

⚠️Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo….

⚠️Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda….

⚠️Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition. These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics….

Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.

Durov, incidentally, born in the Soviet Union in 1984 – of all Orwellian dates! – left Russia in 2014 after Russia’s FSB security service demanded that his company, VKontakte, hand over the personal data of Ukrainian Euromaidan protesters and opposition figures, and for refusing to censor posts on his site.

In Spain, in addition to an arguably justified ban on social media for people under 16 years old, Sanchez’s government is introducing a legislative package consisting of five additions to censor speech online.

First, social media platform executives will not just be fined for failing to remove “illegal, hateful or harmful” content from their platforms in a timely way – they will also now face criminal liability, including possible imprisonment. As Durov warns:

“This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo.”

“Sanchez,” Elon Musk said more bluntly, “is the true fascist totalitarian.”

Second, amplifying “illegal” or “harmful” content through the algorithms will become a crime.

“We will turn algorithmic manipulation and amplification of illegal content into a new criminal offense,” Sanchez said. “No more hiding behind code. No more pretending technology is neutral.”

Third, according to Sanchez:

“We will implement a hate and polarization footprint system to track, quantify, and expose how digital platforms fuel division and amplify hate. For too long, hate has been treated as invisible and untraceable, but we will change that.”

The problem, of course, is that usually “hate” is never defined — meaning that anything and everything can be labeled “hate” and often is. Judgments about what constitutes “hate” become entirely subjective and run the danger of existing exclusively “in the eye of the beholder.”

In Sudan, for instance, a British teacher at an elementary school was sentenced to 40 lashes and a term in prison for having allowed her students to name a teddy bear Muhammad. In Iran today, people who protested against the regime are being sentenced to death for “waging war against God.”

The United States officially enshrines freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the Constitution:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

US courts have ruled that only child pornography and immediate, direct and credible threats, as well as a few other limitations, are banned.

Some governing elites in Spain apparently want to ban X there altogether. “The next battle should be aimed at limiting… and likely banning Twitter,” Minister of Youth and Children Sira Rego stated.

Spain’s Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Díaz, announced that she has left X and that whoever remains on X “is feeding hate policies.”

France is planning a similar move, “to ban minors from Instagram and TikTok,” and Germany is also seriously considering introducing such a ban as well. Germany’s Christian Democratic Union — the conservative party led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz and the largest in the governing coalition — is reportedly set to discuss the issue at its national party congress on February 20-21, 2026.

Denmark, Greece and Britain are also in various stages of either introducing or seriously considering banning X, and European authorities are simultaneously seeking to come up with other ways to close down X.

At the beginning of February, French authorities and European Union police agency Europol raided X’s offices in Paris, over “suspected abuse of algorithms, plus allegations related to deepfake images and wider concerns over posts generated by the platform’s AI chatbot, Grok,” according to Time Magazine.

According to The Telegraph, the raid “was triggered in the first place by an MP in Emmanuel Macron’s centrist party complaining, after Musk’s purchase, that X had ‘reduced diversity of voices’, and a separate complaint that the site hosted ‘nauseating political content'”.

In Britain, according to The Telegraph:

“[T]he Information Commissioner’s Office launched an investigation into deepfakes on X, running in parallel to the Ofcom inquiry into the platform. Liz Kendall, the Technology Secretary, has said the Government will give its ‘full backing’ should the watchdog decide to block access to the site in the UK and accused those opposing the measures of allying with ‘those who think the creation and publication of sexually manipulated images of women and children is acceptable’.”

All this is in addition to a €120 million fine that the European Commission has imposed on X under its “Delete. Silence. Abolish” Digital Services Act.

To the European governments that refuse to acknowledge that many of their citizens are sick and tired of their repressive policies, when the ayatollahs slaughter their citizens in Iran, it is not a pressing problem, but banning X is of the highest priority.

gatestoneinstitute

A ‘hero’ schoolboy who was stabbed during a double knife attack at a school in north London saved other pupils by pulling the fire alarm, it has been claimed. 

Counter terror police are investigating after a 13-year-old boy allegedly shouted ‘Allahu Akbar’ as he unleashed the attack at Kingsbury High School in Brent yesterday lunchtime.  

The suspect is said to be an ‘excluded’ pupil who put his uniform back on to sneak back onto the grounds by ‘climbing over a wall’. 

He was allegedly armed with pepper spray and used the gas on a teacher during a science lesson, horrified witnesses claimed. 

The attacker is said to have then stabbed a 12-year-old boy in the neck and another pupil aged 13 in the midriff in what is believed to have been a targeted attack.

One of the victims has since been praised by parents and on social media as a ‘hero’ who prevented the attacker from harming more pupils. 

Simon Theodorou, a father of a child at the school, said he ‘pulled the fire alarm’ to get help after being stabbed. 

Witnesses on social media said everyone was then evacuated from the building and that the boy ‘put himself in danger to protect others’.  

dailymail

The United Kingdom’s grooming gangs scandal, recently cited by Elon Musk, serves as a warning to the United States as the nation deals with issues of sex trafficking and child exploitation due to immigration policies.

In 2025, Musk made nearly 200 posts, amplifying abuse allegations and paralleling U.S. concerns about exploitation and community influences.

Hearings recently began for U.K. Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe’s independent Rape Gang Inquiry. The inquiry is a crowdfunded investigation into the reported grooming, rape, and exploitation of up to one million vulnerable girls over five decades across the country.

Lowe’s initiative seeks to address perceived government inaction. However, his reversal on promised transparency—after raising funds on that basis—has drawn criticism. This may expose Lowe to legal risks from misled donors and highlights possible lessons for American child protection policy.

The Necessity of the Inquiry: Confronting a History of Organizational Failures

For over 50 years, mostly white English and some Sikh girls from disadvantaged backgrounds were systematically exploited by Muslim Pakistani groups.

In Rotherham, 1,400 children suffered abuse between 1997 and 2013 while authorities allegedly ignored reports to avoid accusations of racism. Similar incidents in up to 40 other towns contributed to national estimates as high as 1 million victims.

Successive governments have not adequately addressed the issue.

Conservative administrations commissioned fragmented reviews, while Labour’s June commitment resulted in the December appointment of Baroness Anne Longfield CBE as chair, along with several panelists, for a statutory inquiry scheduled to begin in March.

At least ten major inquiries have examined grooming and child exploitation, but none focused exclusively on national grooming gangs.

Local reviews, including in Derby, Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford, Telford, and Oldham, and national efforts like the Home Affairs Committee, Children’s Commissioner, and the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, revealed systemic failures but lacked focus, enabling perpetrators to evade justice.

The 2025 Casey audit called for a dedicated investigation, but delays persist. This parallels U.S. concerns about unchecked migration and potential abuses.

Rupert Lowe’s Key Contributions

As the Member of Parliament for Great Yarmouth, Lowe raised over 600,000 pounds ($820,000) through crowdfunding from 20,000 donors. His team, which includes survivor Sammy Woodhouse, identified exploitation in 85 authorities, flagged 1,200 cases (including 200 high-priority cases), and applied pressure on Labour’s inquiry. Through the Restore Britain initiative, Lowe elevates survivor voices and advocates for in-depth reviews and improved protection measures.

Rupert Lowe’s Commitment to Transparency and Its Subsequent Reversal

During his crowdfunding campaign, Lowe pledged that “Stage 2—Public Hearings” would involve “a multiple-day live-streamed hearing period. Hearings will be closed to the public (for safety and control) but broadcast online to guarantee transparency.” This promise of transparency was central to securing donor support, particularly given the history of cover-ups associated with the scandal.

However, this commitment has since been reversed.

Sessions are now held behind closed doors, with no livestreaming and only selected evidence released to the public. Media access is prohibited. This change has sparked fierce criticism, including from former panel member Donna Rachel Edmunds, who branded the inquiry “an utter shambles” and cited inadequate funding, a lack of safeguarding, poor methodology, and her abrupt dismissal after proposing professional support.

Critics argue Lowe’s U-turn betrays donors who funded based on openness, potentially opening him to legal action for misleading representations or breach of terms, eroding trust and jeopardizing the inquiry’s credibility in a scandal demanding full accountability.

The Pursuit of Prosecutions Amid Systemic Obstacles

Lowe’s created his inquiry to facilitate private prosecutions against individuals who enabled abuse. However, achieving justice remains difficult, as demonstrated by the case of “Liz,” who secured a £450,000 judgment against her assailant, Asghar Bostan, in 2023 with support from Robin Tilbrook, Lord Pearson, and Hearts of Oak. Despite this legal victory, no enforcement order has been issued after five years.

Lowe’s inquiry strives to address five decades of institutional neglect.

Although previous investigations have identified significant issues, none have focused exclusively on national grooming networks, showing the need for renewed transparency.

While successful prosecutions could deliver justice, persistent enforcement issues, as demonstrated in Liz’s case, continue. For the United States, this situation illustrates the potential risks of favoring diversity over public safety and stresses the importance of vigilant policy measures to prevent similar abuses.

frontpagemag

Not a ‘conspiracy theory’ anymore.

The millions of ‘Epstein Files’ documents released by the DOJ are revealing damaging information about powerful people all over the world, and also shedding light on the most disturbing aspects of the Epstein trafficking ring lore.

For years, it was rumored that young women and children were murdered by elite figures in his ‘Pedophile Island’ and his New Mexico ‘Zorro Ranch’.

And while this remains in the realm of wildest speculation, new documents within the Epstein files show that ‘330 gallons of sulfuric acid were purchased for the pedophile’s island on the day the FBI opened its investigation into the billionaire’s trafficking charges’.

Daily Mail reported:

“According to a receipt and several email exchanges buried within the millions of files that were released on January 30, Epstein had six 55-gallon drums of the chemical delivered to Little St. James (LSJ) – his private island. The sulfuric acid was purchased for £4,373 on June 12, 2018, coinciding with the date the FBI opened a federal investigation into Epstein’s trafficking activities.”

Why would Epstein need 330 Gallons of Sulfuric Acid? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/pJKQyCPntK

— Tracy (@angelsfly_143) February 9, 2026

“The revelation about the sulfuric acid sparked wild speculation on social media as to what Epstein needed it for, including to ‘destroy evidence or even human remains’ – despite there being no evidence of criminal use.

[…] But further emails in the documents, dating back to 2013, suggest Epstein used sulfuric acid on the private island to purify water.”

The fact that the order was made on the SAME day as the FBI investigation was launched is hard to overlook, as much as the ‘Coincidence Theorists’ insist we do so.

thegatewaypundit

A migrant who abducted and raped a child shortly after coming to Britain by people smuggler boat has been found guilty and faces a lengthy prison sentence and deportation.

Afghan boat migrant Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, who Warwickshire Crown Court heard laughed as he raped a 12-year-old girl while filming the abuse has been found guilty of rape of a child, abduction, two counts of sexual assault and taking an indecent video. The jury failed to reach a verdict on Monday but agreed unanimously to convict on those charged after over seven hours of deliberation on Tuesday. Mulakhil was found not guilty on a second count of rape.

He had appeared in court besides a second Afghan migrant who was accused of strangulation and attempted taking of a child, and who was found not guilty on all counts.

The court had previously heard how Mulakhil met the young girl at a play park in Nuneaton, Warwickshire on 22 July 2025 before taking her to a secluded, but nevertheless public, residential road to be raped. The court heard the victim’s statement that Mulakhil had threatened the child’s family during the attack.

After the attack, the girl was discovered by members of the public who then called police.

Now-convicted child rapist Mulakhil had maintained as defence through the trial that he hadn’t wanted to have sex with the girl at first, that she’d been deceptive over her true age, that she’d “insisted” he make the video recording of the rape on his phone, and that “she drove all of it, and that she consented throughout”. The prosecution told the court that he’d remained unrepentant and hadn’t considered in retrospect that he’d made a mistake.

The Afghan migrant had arrived in the United Kingdom just four months before the attack on a small boat crossing of the English Channel. He was able to be identified quickly by police because he’d used his government issued and funded debit card to buy a drink after the attack. Officers also recovered Mulakhil’s DNA from the 12-year-old victim’s skin and from inside her shorts.

The BBC reports Mulakhil cried as the guilty verdict was read out. He was remanded into custody and will be sentenced at a later date.

Warwickshire Police praised the “immense courage” of the victim for helping them to bring the prosecution against the asylum seeker.

The case gathered considerable public attention as it came amid a national conversation about the wisdom of the government housing large numbers of recently arrived boat migrants in local communities across the country, often in converted hotels or private homes rented by agents of the state. The Nuneaton child rape took place only weeks after a separate sex attack on a child by a boat migrant living in a hotel in Epping, Essex, which itself triggered weeks of unrest.

Nuneaton locals also protested against the rape, and against what had been called an attempted coverup by local police, who did not initially reveal they’d arrested an Afghan asylum seeker. Reform Party Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch had a part in initially exposing the now-proven crime and had battled with police to get information into the public domain. As reported last year:

Finch said that while the attack on the child led to an arrest on July 26th, he wasn’t made aware until days later and said he was investigating why this information had been withheld from even the leader of the council for so long. When he became aware, he said that he “wished to speak to Warwickshire police to urge them to release the immigration status” of the suspects. He said: “I was begging for this to be released, screaming, phoning, asking for it to be released… I think transparency is needed and the people of Nuneaton and the wider Warwickshire area have the right to know who the man is, and his background”.

On what he sees as the importance of pushing on this matter, Finch continued: “We are the last line of defence against the blob, the cover-ups of the councils, and we have to fight every step of the way… it has to stop.” He said: “I was told that if I released this, I would be in contempt of court, that I cannot release this due to the phrase ‘community cohesion’.”

“They’re trying to cover up… and the people of Nuneaton are hurt, they’ve had enough. And that’s why I’m urging all council leaders from all parties to join me in campaigning to stop the housing of illegal immigrants in HMOs, with Serco, and the illegal immigrants in hotels… the Home Office are telling Warwickshire Chief Constable, telling Warwickshire County Council ‘we’re not going to tell you where the HMOs are’… that’s dangerous, that’s against safeguarding… that’s a huge problem for the children in Warwickshire”.

breitbart

Hundreds of residents in Nieuw-Lekkerland, a Dutch town of around 10,000, demonstrated on Monday evening against the potential establishment of an asylum seekers’ housing center in their community. 

The march culminated at the town’s community center, where a residents’ meeting was held and locals were given the opportunity to ask questions regarding the proposed shelter. The protesters presented the results of an online petition to Mayor Theo Segers—a petition that had garnered over 10,000 signatures from people opposing the center.

The organizers said they wanted to peacefully send a message to the municipal government to highlight concerns regarding the potential impact of an asylum center on the livability, safety, and strain on amenities in their community as the Netherlands continues to struggle with a lack of housing for asylum seekers.

As of late January 2026, roughly 80,000 asylum beds were available nationwide—far below the national target of nearly 103,000. According to official figures, only four in ten municipalities currently meet their legal requirements for housing.

The Dutch Dispersal Law (Spreidingswet), which came into effect in February 2024, requires municipalities to take in asylum seekers based on set quotas. These quotas depend on factors such as population size and are meant to spread asylum reception more ‘fairly’ across the country instead of relying on municipalities to volunteer.

In the past months, several municipalities have postponed or withdrawn plans to open asylum centers as a response to backlash from local residents. Mark Boumans, mayor of Doetinchem and chairman of the asylum committee of the Association of Dutch Municipalities, told NL Times, “I have been in local politics since 1995. I cannot remember mass protests against municipal decision-making like this.”

There’s a shortage of housing in general across the Netherlands, and the fact that a large number of large migrant families are arriving in the country poses yet another problem—one that municipalities are legally obligated to solve. Apartments, and even regular-size homes, simply are not big enough to accommodate families with eight, nine, or more children. The Hague is reportedly looking for housing for 19 large migrant families, while the city of Zwolle is trying to find accommodation for a family of 16. Last summer, one municipality decided to purchase a home—with a price tag of €469,000—so that a family of at least ten could move in. Other municipalities are reportedly also pursuing this solution, with the city of Delft announcing their intent to appeal to the central government for additional subsidies to purchase homes.

PVV leader Geert Wilders said municipalities are “rolling out the red carpet” for asylum-seeking families and thundered on X:

Families of 14 people in our homes! Insane. … Borders remain open, coercive legislation remains in place. The Netherlands is rapidly becoming Islamized. … Resistance to national suicide policy is desperately needed.”

Families van 14 mensen in onze huizen! Krankzinnig.
Grenzen blijven open, dwangwet blijft bestaan. Nederland islamiseert snel. Jetten en Yesilgőz laten iedereen binnen.
Verzet tegen nationaal zelfmoordbeleid is hard nodig.#AZCNEE #grenzendicht #PVV #StemPVV pic.twitter.com/KxOsrLG8gJ

— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) February 9, 2026

europeanconservative

France’s opposition has accused President Emmanuel Macron of deliberately locking down key state institutions as the country edges closer to the 2027 presidential election.

Criticism erupted following the nomination of budget minister Amélie de Montchalin, a close Macron ally, as head of the Court of Auditors, one of France’s most powerful and sensitive constitutional bodies.

The Court of Auditors plays a central role in French democracy. It oversees the use of public money, evaluates public policy, audits state and local authorities and can now rule on the financial liability of public managers when serious mismanagement causes significant losses.

Critics argue that Montchalin’s appointment undermines the independence of the Court.

David Lisnard, Mayor of Cannes and President of the liberal Nouvelle Énergie (New Energy) party, condemned what he described as a self-serving political elite entrenching itself outside the ballot box.

“The caste walls itself up in the power it grants itself through means other than the ballot. We will have to blow these citadels to pieces in order to unlock the country, to free it from the conformism and the self-referential bubble of those who have failed but are convinced they are the only legitimate ones to occupy the top positions in the Republic,” he said on social media today.

Historian Jean-Noël Anceau warned that the appointment fits a broader and troubling pattern.

“The appointment of Amélie de Montchalin to head the Cour des Comptes, following that of Richard Ferrand to the Conseil constitutionnel and likely that of another Élysée loyalist to the helm of the Banque de France, signals a complete perversion of our institutions,” he warned.

“How will the current minister be able to issue a credible opinion on the next budget that she herself prepared? The distrust of the French toward their leaders has never been so strong since 1958. The disaster lies in wait. E Macron will forever remain its principal architect,” he added.

From the Left,  Éric Coquerel, chair of Parliament’s Finance Committee and an MP for La France Insoumise, said the nomination weakens an institution that depends on public trust.

“Nothing about this decision is right,” Coquerel said, arguing that the President of the Court must be impartial, neutral, and independent, as required by the ethical code governing financial institutions.

“It is not an insult to say that Amélie de Montchalin meets none of these criteria. From now on, any suspicion cast over the Court’s work will be legitimate,” he insisted in a press conference today.

An ally of Macron, Yaël Braun-Pivet, President of the National Assembly, defended the appointment on feminist grounds.

“The Court of Auditors has never been led by a woman in more than 200 years. I’m tired of a Republic in which women are denied access to the highest positions,” she said today.

Beyond concerns over the institution’s independence, critics have also pointed to de Montchalin’s age.

At just 40, she could remain at the head of the Court of Auditors until the age of 68, benefiting from the principle of irremovability, which effectively locks her in the job for nearly three decades.

brusselssignal

At a German train station in the city of Rosenheim, three foreigners are accused of beating a 38-year-old man because he asked them to be quieter on Sunday morning. The beating comes shortly after a foreign national beat a German train controller to death earlier this month.

The three suspects, who are from Yemen, Eritrea, and Sierra Leone, have all been charged with grievous bodily harm, according to the Federal Police Directorate Munich.

After the man asked them to be quieter, an argument ensued, and the three men jumped the victim.

When police arrived, they found two men on the ground in a fight. Witnesses told police that two other suspects had been involved and had just fled. Police tracked them down in the city of Rosenheim, according to Welt newspaper.

The victim suffered several lacerations to his face due to the assault.

The suspects are aged 35, 31, and 28 and have all been registered in the German immigration system.

Police conducted a breathalyzer and found the men had elevated blood alcohol levels of “around one and almost two per mille.”

The men have already been released from custody after being charged.

The assault aligns with general trends, which show that foreigners are vastly overrepresented in serious crimes on German public transport.

Foreigners are responsible for 62 percent of all crimes in the German state of Baden-Württemberg on public transport, despite being only 16 percent of the population.

The state of Saxony, which has a relatively small migrant population, has seen a crime explosion, with 50 percent of crimes at train stations committed by foreigners

According to German federal police data, foreigners commit 59 percent of all sexual crimes on German trains and train stations, the latest crime data shows. Sexual violence crimes have doubled between 2019 and 2024.

This all comes at a time when the left is increasingly promoting public transport for the German population as a solution to climate change.

rmx

Any progress in society has to be achieved over the fierce objection of abject liberals.

For decades, the Scandinavian Kingdom of Sweden was known for its open and welcoming society, and it took years of unchecked mass migration to destroy that.

And besides the fraying of the social fabric by an army of unassimilating migrants, Sweden was soon going to have to deal with a surge in organized crime activity, including the use of children for hits.

Now, it’s a common sight to note ‘children being pulled off the streets and searched without a warrant, or having their phones spied on by detectives’.

The Telegraph reported:

“But after four years of gang violence that has seen children as young as 12 recruited on social media to carry out hit jobs against rival gangsters, police say it has become a grim but necessary reality.

In April 2024, Swedish police were handed sweeping new powers to tackle the rise of Middle Eastern drug syndicates that were grooming boys and girls into being ‘foot soldiers’ by offering them up to 150,000 kroner (£12,500) per job.”

Another Swedish case from last year: A 16 year girl named as "Lisa" accepted a gig job as a murder commando. She and a 15 year old boy entered an apartment complex and shot a young women to death, the woman's husband was shot in his hand.

It was her first job for a criminal gang https://t.co/bwBwXZx610 pic.twitter.com/DPJUh7wxuE

— Birch Brother 🪓 (@BjorkBrodern) February 9, 2026

Now, Swedish officers have the power to stop and search people and vehicles without specific suspicion of a crime.

“Children under the age of 15 can also be placed under phone and internet surveillance by police if they are suspected of serious crimes, such as being involved in gang assassinations or bomb making.

Two years on, the laws – which had prompted outcry amongst liberals – are working. Sweden has seen the biggest decline in gun violence since the crisis began in 2022, according to the latest data.”

A 20-year-old has been attacked in a park in Stockholm.

The attackers cut his hand off with a machete.

The police say it’s a case of violence between gangs competing for shares of the drug market 🇸🇪 pic.twitter.com/kAHYhLG5HQ

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) December 7, 2025

thegatewaypundit