The Green Party would offer illegal migrants free accommodation and a Universal Basic Income with no requirement to seek work, according to newly surfaced policy documents.
Under proposals backed by leader Zack Polanski, those arriving in Britain without authorisation would gain immediate access to NHS services and be allowed to work without restriction as part of the party’s vision for “a world without borders”.
The internal papers, revealed by the Daily Mail, also set out plans to scrap immigration detention entirely and grant amnesty to migrants whose asylum claims have been rejected.
The documents declare that “migration is not a criminal offence under any circumstances” and outline an approach that would treat new arrivals as “citizens in waiting”, encouraging them to settle permanently.
Migrant families would be provided with exclusive use of a house or flat, while single men would be allocated their own rooms in shared properties.
Those identifying as LGBT would receive separate accommodation for safeguarding reasons.
The proposals say these entitlements would remain in place “even if their case is rejected”, with no deportation for those who have exhausted appeal rights.
Border Force officers would be instructed to adopt a “neutral approach” during interviews, accepting applicants’ accounts “in the absence of contrary evidence”.
Fines for airlines and ferry operators carrying undocumented passengers would also be abolished.
The revelations come as a fresh national poll places the Greens second in voting intention, intensifying scrutiny of their platform.
Reform UK Home Affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf condemned the plans as “reckless” and “dangerous”.
“Under the Green’s open borders plans not only is every hoodlum and criminal welcome to our shores but entitled to free housing, healthcare and anything else they might fancy,” he told the Daily Mail.
Mr Yusuf added: “My only surprise is Zack Polanski isn’t promising to furnish them all with free heroin and crack cocaine which he wants to legalise.
“The Green’s policies are not only financially reckless but also dangerous.”
His remarks follow reports last week detailing the party’s proposals to decriminalise drugs including heroin and crack cocaine, which the Greens argue “enhance human relationships and human creativity”.
Reacting to the internal documents, a Labour source said: “The British public rightly expect our country to have immigration controls that are fair and properly enforced – not the open-borders plan that the Greens are proposing.”
A recent Find Out Now poll of 3,029 respondents put the Greens on 18 per cent nationally, behind Reform on 25 per cent but ahead of Labour on 16 per cent.
A source from within Mr Polanski’s party said the proposals differ from the party’s fully costed 2024 manifesto, but admitted they remain a “long-standing policy and aim”.
A spokesman for the Green Party told the Daily Mail: “We’re proud of [this] policy, voted on and decided by our members, however much the Daily Mail tries to spin it.
“And we know it’s popular as well – Green policy regularly comes out as the most popular in polls, and it is also going down well in Gorton and Denton where Greens are now neck-and-neck with Reform to win what used to be one of Labour’s safest seats in the country.”
On the evening of February 23, a federal police patrol at Gelsenkirchen Central Station noticed two men wearing bulletproof vests. During a check, the officers found a loaded alarm gun in the men’s handbag.
At around 10:30 p.m., the officers identified the two 19-year-olds, who were both apparently wearing protective vests under their jackets. The Syrian and the German were dressed entirely in black. When questioned, the German national stated that he was carrying a firearm in his shoulder bag. The man from Essen was asked to slowly hand over the bag he was carrying under his arm to the officers. In the bag, they found a loaded alarm gun and confiscated it immediately. When asked for a gun licence, the young man replied in the negative, whereupon the officers instructed him. The accused exercised his right to remain silent and made no further statements. In the office, the officers established his identity beyond doubt and carried out an identification procedure, taking his fingerprints and photographs. After completing the police measures, the federal police officers released the accused and his companion. The two protective vests were also confiscated.
A preliminary investigation was initiated for violation of the Weapons Act.
Anyone concerned about the present and future of Western civilization has surely been watching, with emotions ranging from dismay to outrage, the disheartening capitulation of the United Kingdom. England, a country that famously once ruled over an empire on which the sun never set, is now in the process of submitting to Islamic colonization, thanks of course to the country’s multiculturalist elites and their genocidal aim to eradicate all traces of the indigenous British people and their culture.
Many believe that Europe is a lost cause, that demography is destiny and it’s too late to reverse the mass migration of millions of mostly military-age Muslim males who openly express their imperialist designs on the continent. But the British people are rising up, led by such defenders of the West as politician Rupert Lowe and dauntless activist Tommy Robinson.
More voices are joining theirs. Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, also known as Posie Parker, is a British women’s rights activist (but “not a feminist,” she hastens to add) and founder of Let Women Speak. She is known for popularizing, at least in gender-critical circles, the slogan “adult human female,” which is perceived to be anti-transgender, although it is simply the definition of “woman” – a concept apparently foreign to the gender ideologues of the Left. Much like Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, Keen has been called “a leading voice in the anti-trans movement” (not intended as a compliment). Predictably, she is sometimes smeared as “far-right,” which is media-speak for people who hold views that were considered normal and sane for all of human history up until ten minutes ago. She has been targeted by the terror group Antifa and other violent lunatics at her public appearances everywhere from Portland to New Zealand (which she described as “the worst place for women she has ever visited”).
In other words, she is no stranger to courageous truth-telling. And now she is courting controversy again.
On Saturday, Keen posted a video creation of her own making (via AI): a five-minute, animated musical number from a fictional parody of a forthcoming Disney film called The Caliphate. A sort of modified version of the song “Belle” from the Disney classic Beauty and the Beast, the video features a blonde female protagonist singing and dancing her way through a tale of two cities: a sunny, idyllic British town transformed before our eyes into a dark, dystopian nightmare by submission to Islamic conquest from within. “Welcome to Britain under the brand new caliphate,” she sings in the chorus. “You’re no longer free.”
The video opens with a parodic version of the iconic Walt Disney Pictures logo, with Islamic crescents and a palace of domes and minarets substituting for the Disneyland castle and fireworks. It is at once amusing and chilling. Then our heroine leads us on a melodic but terrifying journey into Islamic totalitarianism, beginning with the eye-opening, straightforward lines,
They say “Convert, pay up or die”
And they look you in the eye
Knowing you believed the lie
That inclusion was everybody’s friend
When the truth now we all know
That was the beginning of the end
You didn’t fight back, you failed to resist
And now the country is under their fist
Well. You won’t get lyrics like that from the current woke Disney.
The video takes us into the darkest depths of life under sharia, from girls as young as nine being taken as wives, to stoning for homosexuality. It reflects a misogynistic reality under an Islamic theocracy that eclipses the Left’s fear-mongering, ridiculous Handmaid’s Tale fantasy they warn us will come about under Christian nationalism.
The trailer ends with an ominous “COMING SOON” onscreen; and indeed it is clear, to all with eyes to see, that accelerated Islamic colonization is already underway – and not just in Europe. Right here in the Land of the Free, a Muslim communist has been elected mayor of New York City, a mere 25 years after the 9/11 attacks. In Times Square, Muslims gathered en masse recently for their usual performative public prayer to signal dominance over the infidels:
Even Texas is becoming a Ground Zero for booming Islamic expansion in America; it is among the five United States with the highest Muslim population. The Dallas area alone boasts something like 60 mosques. Houston has the highest Muslim population in the South and ranks among the 5 most Muslim-populated cities in the U.S. Listen to this Muslim imam in Texas telling the people in his mosque that Zohran Mamdani’s election in New York was a “game-changer,” that Europe and Australia are being conquered demographically, and that “We need to enlarge the Muslim population in America, just like we did in Europe”:
Islamic imam in Texas:
“Mamdani was a victory for the Ummah. We didn’t succeed in conquering Vienna by the sword for 200 years, and now it’s 20% Muslim.
We need to enlarge the Muslim population in America, just like we did in Europe.”
While the West wrings its hands in civilizational guilt and self-loathing, Islam is on the rise and is gathering momentum. When will we wake up and do what needs to be done? That is what Kellie-Jay Keen is asking with her video.
As of this writing, TheCaliphate video has over 421,000 views on X. Check it out, with the full transcription of the lyrics below it, and help it go even more viral:
Sweden’s public broadcaster Sveriges Television (SVT) has been reprimanded by the country’s media watchdog after one of its correspondents referred to migrants crossing the English Channel as “illegal migrants” during a news segment.
The ruling was issued by the Review Board, following complaints about a report broadcast on SVT’s flagship news program “Rapport” in September 2025.
The feature covered anti-immigration protests in the United Kingdom against hotels housing asylum seekers. During the segment, SVT’s U.K. correspondent Anna-Maja Persson stated, “So far this year, a record number of illegal migrants have crossed the English Channel to the U.K., where asylum seekers are being placed in hotels, among other things.”
As Samnytt reported, two viewers reported the broadcast, arguing that the expression “illegal migrants” was evaluative and created the impression that people seeking asylum had committed crimes.
In its response to the Review Board, SVT maintained that the wording was intended to reflect the legal classification under British law of the method of entry — not to describe the individuals concerned as criminals. The broadcaster argued that those arriving via irregular routes lack valid entry permits and that this form of entry is described as illegal migration in UK legislation, including under the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
Under the legislation, a migrant is considered to be “in breach of immigration control” if they enter “without leave where leave is required,” enter “via irregular routes such as small boats,” or arrive “without valid entry clearance.”
While some argue that irregular entry is the only way that some believe they can claim asylum, the reality is that it is not, with multiple programs running in conflict zones where genuine asylum requests are considered. All arrivals have also passed through multiple “safe” countries where they are expected to claim asylum at the first opportunity.
Also, while the vast majority of those arriving illegally claim asylum, not all do, and therefore remain living in Britain illegally.
Despite the legal definition, Sweden’s Review Board rejected that defense. In its decision, it stated that even if British authorities classify the phenomenon as illegal migration, that “does not legitimize the use of the term illegal migrant for individuals who arrive in the country in this way.”
“In the opinion of the committee, this designation was both misleading in violation of the requirement for objectivity and evaluative in violation of the requirement for impartiality,” the board wrote, as cited by Journalisten.
The ruling was not unanimous. Vice-chairman Ulrik von Essen and board member Staffan Rosell dissented, arguing that SVT should have been acquitted.
Jean Luc Mélenchon, leader of radical left La France Insoumise (LFI), announced today at the party press conference that, if LFI wins the 2027 presidential election, the first law he wants to pass will be aimed at “breaking media monopolies”.
Mélenchon, known for his adversarial relationship with the press, vows to “liberate” the media from financial interests, while dismantling conglomerates he deems incompatible with pluralism.
The leader of the party is explicitly targeting press groups owned by billionaire and supporter of Marine Le Pen, Vincent Bolloré (CNews, Canal+, Europe 1, Le Journal du Dimanche), which he promises to “sell off in pieces” or, if necessary, to “confiscate”.
He also argues that press subsidies should be reserved for struggling outlets, such as the left-wing daily L’Humanité, or for emerging independent media rather than established “bourgeois” outlets like Le Monde.
Mélenchon’s criticism extends beyond traditional media outlets to what he calls an “insufferable monopoly” over the entire literary chain. His target includes not only the major publishing houses but also the retailers and bookstores that control the distribution of “ideas”.
These statements were made during a press conference organized by LFI near their headquarters in Paris. According to Libération, the radical left party restricted access to its press conference, inviting only a select group of independent and “new media”, alongside several influencers and YouTubers.
In contrast, the vast majority of national media organisations including public broadcasters and several outlets typically considered left-leaning were denied entry. Though these major newsrooms were officially notified of the event via a press release, they were barred from attending.
After the press conference, Mélenchon personally attacked Le Monde journalist Olivier Pérou on X, accusing him of lying about the party’s selective media credentials. He adds that Pérou would be permanently barred from all future LFI events, citing the reporter’s past descriptions of the party as a “sect” as a breach of professional relationships.
Olivier Pérou rédacteur au "Monde", plein de mépris pour ses collègues des nouveaux médias purement numériques, prétend que nous aurions trié sur le volet nos invités. Pur mensonge. Il confond avec ses réunions de rédaction. En toute hypothèse et quel que soit le cadre, lui ne…
Lyon 2 university Sebleouf, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
At a time when pro-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan is being welcomed with honours at the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Lyon (Sciences Po Lyon), Professor Fabrice Balanche, just a few metres away, is under the protection of a private security firm for having opposed the holding of a Ramadan fast-breaking banquet on the premises of Lyon 2 University.
The revelation comes from Professor Balanche himself: he has had to teach under the protection of two security guards from a private security company since he was intimidated eleven months ago during one of his lectures by masked individuals, whom he identifies as belonging to “the anti-fascist nebula that reigns on campus.” The reason: he opposed the organisation of Ramadan fast-breaking banquets at the University of Lyon 2, where he teaches political geography of the Middle East. About fifteen masked activists came to disrupt his class, shouting “Racists, Zionists, you are the terrorists,” accusing him of being “pro-Assad, an accomplice to genocide.”
Since then, he has been living under constant threat. His name is spray-painted on the walls of the campus: “Balanche, get lost!” “Balanche Nazi,” “Balanche, get out.” Living in constant fear of physical attack, he now teaches with two private security guards—not police officers—stationed outside the door of his lecture theatre.
In October, a poster campaign carried out jointly in the buildings of Sciences Po Lyon and Lyon 2 targeted him in particular. It was at Sciences Po Lyon that the pro-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan was invited on February 12th. The La France Insoumise (LFI) activist was greeted by a counter-protest organised by the feminist identity Collectif Némésis, which in turn triggered violence from Lyon’s antifas, leading to the lynching of Quentin Deranque, who had come to protect his friends from the Némésis group.
Young Quentin was a mathematics student at the University of Lyon 2. Professor Balanche deplores the fact that nothing was organised by the institution following his tragic death: “No tribute, no minute’s silence, no display of Quentin’s portrait.” For him, the facts are clear: “Quentin died because he opposed the destruction of the university by the far left.” The university administration focused its communication on the “political exploitation” of Quentin’s death and scarcely expressed its compassion to the victim.
Among professors at Lyon 2 and Sciences Po, the leftist narrative is widely accepted: Quentin remains a “neo-Nazi,” and the “far right,” suspected of having set up an ambush, ultimately got what it deserved. Le Figaro had access to an internal discussion group between professors at Sciences Po Paris, entitled “Débats Privés Enseignants ScPo” (Private Debates among Sciences Po Teachers), which leaves no doubt about their biased interpretation of the facts. The victim, Quentin, is portrayed as “a nationalist activist who was there to protect transphobic racists from Némésis.” Throughout the conversation, comments that deny the very existence of far-left violence are legion. The exchanges, which took place over several days, became so heated that some teachers ended up concluding that “these neo-Nazis got what they were looking for, in more ways than one.” Some teachers ended up demanding an apology from the author of this statement—an economics teacher, who refused to comply and preferred to remain silent.
In Lyon, divisions are only deepening. The favourite candidate for mayor of Lyon, Jean-Michel Aulas, asked the current mayor, the ecologist Grégory Doucet, to display Quentin’s portrait on the façade of the town hall. The latter refused, describing the request as “indecent.” Doucet is known for having ostentatiously displayed his support in the past for La Jeune Garde, the anti-fascist movement responsible for Quentin’s death. For Professor Balanche, there is “an objective ecosystem uniting the city of Lyon, the town hall, Lyon 2 and Sciences Po Lyon.”
British Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer has been accused of overseeing a system which reportedly allowed suspected grooming gang child rapists to walk free with a warning during his time as the country’s top prosecutor.
According to an investigation from the Express newspaper, at least 13,000 “Child Abduction Warning Notices” were sent out by police between 2008 and 2025 in a supposed effort to “disrupt” child rape grooming gangs. However, it is possible that the true figure is much higher, given inconsistent record-keeping by police forces.
The warning letter system, the paper noted, was started in the wake of revelations concerning the predominantly Pakistani Muslim child rape gang scandals in Rotherham and Rochdale.
The investigation noted that the first instance of the term “Child Abduction Warning Notices” as a part of a national strategy to confront sexual abuse was in a 2011 report written by Sir Keir Starmer when he was serving at the helm of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
In one notable example, some 220 warning letters were reportedly handed out to suspected members of a Newcastle grooming gang as a part of Northumbria Police’s Operation Sanctuary.
Despite police forces using such warning letters for nearly two decades, there has never been any comprehensive study into their effectiveness in deterring child sex offenders or the likelihood of their issuance leading to prosecutions.
Former Manchester detective turned grooming gang whistleblower Maggie Oliver told the Express that she had witnessed police colleagues using the warning letters as a means of making investigations “go away”.
“I worked on a case where we had identified 97 child abusers that investigation should have led to serious charges of child rape on a pretty industrial scale,” she said. “I expected multiple charges of rape against possibly dozens of men. But [instead they] warned a couple of men under the child abduction warning notices. My opinion is they were used to get rid of a job.”
Reform UK Shadow Home Secretary Zia Yusuf said the report demonstrated that Prime Minister Starmer’s position is “completely untenable”, adding: “Instead of fighting for the full force of the law against vile grooming gang predators, Keir Starmer presided over a system that sent out weak and useless ‘warning letters’ to paedophiles.”
Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy added that “serious questions must be answered about the policies pursued by the Crown Prosecution Service during Keir Starmer’s tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions, and whether those policies contributed to this catastrophic failure.”
Questions have long been raised over Starmer’s potential role in the effective cover-up of grooming gangs during his tenure as the nation’s top prosecutor, with critics frequently citing the initial decision in 2009 not to prosecute a Rochdale grooming gang over the supposed unreliability of a victim. This decision was later reversed by Nazir Afzal, chief prosecutor for northwest England, an appointee of Starmer, who determined the victim to be credible.
Beyond Starmer, many in his left-wing Labour Party are believed to have been directly implicated in the failures to confront Islamic grooming gangs, with local officials in predominantly Labour-controlled areas of the country having been frequentlyfound to have ignored child sex abuse for fear of appearing racist or stoking local ethnic tensions. Victims were often branded by local officials as “prostitutes” despite being under the age of consent.
Although Starmer initially opposed a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal, accusing those in favour of a public investigation of jumping on the “bandwagon of the far-right“ and even whipping his own backbenchers last year against voting for an inquiry, public pressure eventually forced the PM to backtrack and allow an inquiry to go ahead.
However, the controversy surrounding the issue has only continued, with prominent grooming victims accusing the government of a further cover up last month by scrapping the inquiry’s survivors advisory panel.
Official portrait of Rupert Lowe MP. Wikimedia Commons, Laurie Noble, CC-BY-3.0
The political landscape of Britain changed significantly on February 13, 2026, after Rupert Lowe MP launched a new party to offer the British population an option on the right.
The launch video, which featured Lowe on the grounds of his own farm donning traditional British country clothing, broke records as it amassed over 40 million views, and was promoted by Elon Musk.
Polling at 10 percent from day one, Restore Britain’s launch has caused a sensation on the political stage and has significantly – and e uniquely in the context of British politics – emphasized a Christian and civilizationally-restorative political stance.
I am today launching Restore Britain as a national political party.
The launch of the party comes after Lowe was controversially expelled from the Reform UK party by its leader, Nigel Farage, due to Lowe’s advocacy for mass-deportations – and amid supporters’ disaffection with Reform’s leftward realignment.
The day after the launch, Lowe stated on X: “Britain is a Christian country, and under a Restore Britain government – it will remain a Christian country.”
Restore Britain’s campaigns director and spokesperson, Charlie Downes, who is a traditional Catholic and convert to the faith, similarly drew fire from center-right figures involved with Reform UK for insinuating “Restore Britain believe that Britain is a people defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith.”
Downes agreed to speak to LifeSiteNews about his new party, what it can offer faithful Christian voters and supporters, and why its leaders believe their policy platform aligns soundly with a faithfully Christian worldview.
“Christianity is inextricable from Britain’s history and our national identity,” Downes told LifeSiteNews.
“In my view, a civilization is a series of covenants,” he added. “First is marriage – the permanent union of one man and one woman before God. Marriage is the foundation of the household, which is a married couple with children and property. The household in turn should be considered the fundamental economic unity of society (as opposed to the individual, as liberals argue, or class, as socialists argue).”
Downes revealed he thinks the individualist bent contemporary liberals and most politicians hold leads to a fatal flaw where they refuse to recognize the foundational importance of the family. Sub-replacement fertility and cheap labor imported by big businesses which see all as individual economic units of production are downstream from this, he believes. All of these issues Restore Britain aspires to help ameliorate.
“From the household comes the tribe,” he continued.
“We see this with Abraham,” Downes added, situating his understanding within the Biblical context, the classical philosophy of antiquity, and Catholic scholasticism.
Downes extended this to explain that subsequently, “from tribes come a nation,” citing the examples of ancient Israel and Judea from the 12 tribes of Genesis, and England from the Angles, Jutes, and Saxons.
“The nation, like marriage, is a covenant whose purpose is to glorify God. Mass migration undermines this, and so mass migration is necessarily anti-Christian and immoral. Reversing it is therefore the Christian’s duty,” he explained, arguing it threatens to upend covenant as a basis for social order.
Downes also acknowledged that not all forms of migration are of equal threat or value. Migration from certain nations, where historically hostile religions such as Islam dominate, the party believes ought to be heavily restricted. Lowe proposes to block entirely routes to entry and citizenship from nations such as Somalia and Afghanistan, Downes explains.
Restore Britain will not merely pay lip service to vague notions of “Christian values,” Downes said, but will not be afraid to wade into religious matters legislatively and politically where necessary. A substantive policy paper Restore Britain has already drafted and supported advocates the ban of halal and kosher meat. Restore also intends to outlaw the burqa, the Islamic dress worn by women to cover the body and face.
“What liberals don’t understand is that religious convictions, when sincerely held, aren’t malleable and flexible like mere political beliefs,” Downes said.
Downes believes this is why the notion millions of Muslims are likely to integrate into British, Western, or European culture, which is essentially shaped and informed by Christian faith, is naive – and for this reason political leaders cannot ignore tenets of certain religious worldviews which are hostile or antagonistic to Christian Westerners as a people.
For Downes, although religion and politics are distinct, contemporary political actors scarcely realize or understand how these necessarily and unavoidably intersect.
“People often say Islam is a system of political control rather than a religion. But those two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive,” he says.
Downes points out, “Christianity certainly has a political shape” and this is one he thinks is mostly incompatible with Islam, as well as a number of other deeply-ingrained cultural practices and attitudes found around the world.
In Britain, Downes insists, “we are a Christian state,” something he points out is less a matter of opinion than a “matter of fact,” both “constitutionally” as well as “historically.”
Asked whether migration and religious demographics, however legitimate a concern, might be reduced to a panacea for all political problems for some on the right, Downes did agree this could be a danger.
He quoted another traditionalist Catholic friend of his, who argues: “Britain is not dying because she is being invaded. She is being invaded because she is dying.”
Restore Britain seeks, instead, to stoke a far broader social, cultural, economic, and fundamental revival.
Downes argued that Lowe and Restore are unique in the landscape because they break the mold of profligacy in politics, where leaders promise plenty and are dishonest about fiscal challenges or strain caused by policy implementation.
“We believe in an economy that rewards hard work, prudence,” he adds.
Though the party is not in favor of the “nanny state” or “big government,” and wants to “take the boot off the neck of smaller sized businesses,” he explains neither is the party “free market fundamentalist.”
Restore intends to “use state power” in a manner which, rather than merely to “shore up the interests of big business,” would “safeguard the institutions that make our country feel like a home.”
One of the things which makes Lowe a leader, Downes said, is his frankness. Necessary and desirable policies are often initially “painful,” and Lowe, he argued, is the only figure with the fortitude to acknowledge and confront this.
The mass deportations of the 2 million illegal migrants, which Restore Britain has committed to carrying out quickly once in office, as well as pursuing a policy of net negative migration, meaning more people leaving or being repatriated from the country than new arrivals settling “for the foreseeable future,” they recognize is something which will be financially and politically difficult. Although, they are insistent that it is possible.
Restore Britain would repeal the assisted dying bill and reverse recent changes which decriminalise abortion up to birth.
British Christians now have a political party that represents their views, and will act on it.
After the launch, one of Downes’ fiercest critics was Reform UK’s Muslim candidate to be Mayor of London, who accused his position of resembling “neo-Nazism.”
Elsewhere, Downes spoke alongside Harrison Pitt, Restore’s senior policy fellow, and Lewis Brackpool, who leads the party’s formal investigations into a rape gang scandal which involved Pakistani Muslim crimes against European and Christian girls. On the Lotus Eaters podcast, these senior spokespersons explained that, as Christians, the claim that wishing to defend Britain’s indigenous people and its religion is Nazism is absurd.
They argued instead that they merely recognize that nations are real entities, comprised of particular peoples often bound by ancestry and religion and history or creed, and that safeguarding indigenous peoples from hostile ones or a civilization from replacement by its adversaries is warranted and reasonable; something not in any way “hateful” or extreme.
“I can see how it might be scary if people were to imbue ethnic identity with a sense of quasi-religious or messianic significance and regard it as the measure of all things. That’s really what the Nazis really were guilty of – viewing it as the measure of all things, including moral values,” said Pitt.
“Given that our framework is Christian, and is explicitly Christian, we regard the existence of ethnic difference as simply a feature of God’s creation. And therefore we want to act as stewards over it. In just the same way that we want wildlife to flourish. It’s not a matter of wanting to stamp out alternative forms of organic life,” he continued.
“And given that our moral framework is much more Christian than it is informed by a quasi-religious sense of blood and ethnic significance, we are not going to mutate into any kind of Nazi fever dreams or anything like that, because it would be inconsistent with our Christian perspective of the good.”
“This is really important, because we are a Christian party,” added Downes. “One of the key principles of Christianity is not to worship idols, and to make an idol of the nation or the race, is by definition anti-Christian, so the idea that’s the direction we’re going to go is absurd.”
Downes confirmed to LifeSiteNews that Lowe would “absolutely call himself a Christian” and that most of the top positions at the top of the party are occupied by people who are both confessional and observant.
The killer Valdo Calocane was sentenced to a hospital order in January. GB News
Racism kills. And by that I mean liberal racism of this kind.
In 2023, Valdo Calocane, an African immigrant stabbed to death two teenage university students and an older man, then he drove a van into a number of people on the street, attacked police with a knife and was finally taken down.
There had been plenty of warning beforehand. But Calocane couldn’t be locked up because black men were already “overrepresented” in custody and apparently his British victims were underrepresented in the morgue.
Valdo Calocane killed teenage students Grace O’Malley-Kumar and Barnaby Webber and 65-year-old caretaker Ian Coates in June 2023.
He then called his brother and told him: “This will be the last time I speak to you. Take the family out of the country.”
When asked if he was going to do something stupid, Calocane replied: “It is already done.”
The enquiry heard today how mental health professionals debated whether to section Calocane in 2020 when he tried to kick down a neighbour’s door.
However, it was decided to release him into the community after considering “research that shows over-representation of young black males in detention.”
He isn’t going to prison now either.
He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January 2024 after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder, something which has been widely criticised by the victims’ families.
Calocane was catered to every step of the way and he’s still being catered to because in the UK, a third world immigrant matters more than the people he’s terrorizing and killing.
Valdo Calocane, who killed three people during a violent rampage in Nottingham, was not forced to take injectable antipsychotic medication because he did not like needles, a report on his care has found.
He was known to refuse to take medication when at home
The report states: “The inpatient teams involved in Calocane’s care were trying to treat Calocane in the least restrictive way and took on board his reasons for not wanting to take depot medication, which included him not liking needles.”
The report also found that a risk assessment in February 2022 had urged staff not to visit Calocane at home and if required to do so, not to go alone.
The risk assessment notes state that Calocane had a “history of violence and aggression when detained … violence and aggression towards housemates … poor insight [and] does not agree that he has been unwell over the last 12 months”.
Calocane’s first psychotic episode was recorded in May 2020, when he broke into neighbouring flats and frightened a woman so badly that she jumped from a first-floor window and injured her back, requiring surgery.
He was discharged from mental health services in September 2022 after missing a number of appointments, and staff were unable to visit him at home as he had provided an incorrect address.
The system worked as intended. Three members of the native population are dead, a bunch are injured and a third worlder is perpetually under government care while suffering no consequences for his crimes.
An Afghan migrant convicted of rape in Austria was granted asylum in Britain after a series of errors from the Home Office.
Omar Ali Noori, 31, was arrested in Linz in 2018 over allegations he raped a woman.
After being released on bail, he fled the country and arrived in Britain the following year.
Despite his criminal history, the Home Office granted Noori indefinite leave to remain in 2023.
His 23-year-old wife later joined him in Britain, court documents show.
Records also revealed that Noori used four different identities and provided five separate dates of birth on official documents.
During extradition proceedings, Judge Neeta Minhas described him as a “fugitive”.
“Noori was directly asked if he had committed or been accused of an offence in any country or whether he had been detained in any country.
“His response to both questions was in the negative. This was clearly not accurate.
“I find that Noori is a fugitive.”
Ms Minhas ordered that the 31-year-old be extradited to Austria to serve his prison sentence.
The Afghan national, who is currently being held at Wandsworth Prison, is set to launch an appeal against the ruling.
A spokeswoman for the Home Office said: “This individual’s extradition proceedings are ongoing.
“We review individuals’ immigration status should new information come to light that it was obtained through fraud, false representation, or concealment of a material fact.
“We will not allow foreign criminals and illegal migrants to exploit our laws.
“We are reforming human rights laws and replacing the broken appeals system so we can scale up deportations.”
It comes just days after Afghan asylum seeker Ahmad Mulakhil was been found guilty at Warwick Crown Court of abducting, raping and taking indecent video of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.
The 23-year-old targeted the girl last July and initially denied two counts of rape, two counts of sexual assault, abducting a child and taking indecent photographs of a child.
Since October 2021, more than 35,000 Afghan nationals have claimed asylum in Britain.
In addition to this figure, over 37,000 have been granted permission to stay in the country through the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) or the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS).
