Allah's Willing Executioners

“Before they raped me, they would chant, “In the name of Allah”

The first known Pakistani Muslim rape grooming gang incident in the UK took place in 1955 and involved Pakistanis in Bradford and a 15-year-old girl. As the latest grooming gang inquiry notes, this took place after the British Nationality Act 1948 enabled mass migration to the UK.

More cases involving girls as young as 11 years old began to pop up in the sixties, often centering around Bradford, with headlines such as “Girl Mauled by Pakistani in Trafalgar Square” (1961) and “Pakistani Indecent Assault on 11 year old in Leicester” (1962) and then on through the years and the decades of Islamic systemic trafficking of underage girls in the UK.

The latest inquiry into the Muslim sex grooming gangs conducted by MP Rupert Lowe estimates 250,000 as a low figure for the number of mostly white English girls assaulted in 149 districts making up nearly 40% of such districts in the UK. in which the perpetrators range from a British Muslim ‘lord’ to police officers, taxi drivers and restaurateurs who helped traffic the victims.

The 70 years of Muslim rape gangs represent not just individual crimes or even gang crimes, but a systemic ‘Rape Jihad’ akin to the systematic Muslim sexual assaults during the Armenian genocide, the mass abductions of women and girls from Europe under the Ottoman Empire, the Hamas sexual assaults of Oct 7, and the sexual assaults on Iranian protesters by ‘police’.

As the report notes, “250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.”

The 219-page report makes it clear that these attacks were driven by a cultural ‘honour- and shame-based clan code’ among Pakistanis and other Muslims, as well as by “theological and legal aspects of Islam” that demand “enmity towards non-Muslims”, “a system of sex slavery that authorises sexual relations with non-Muslim captives, and a religiously sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims.” These are the essentials of Islamic life.

“Before they raped me, they would chant, ‘In the name of Allah the most merciful,’” one victim described. In other cases, “perpetrators shouted ‘Allahu Akbar’ and boasted of racial supremacy.”

Victims of the Muslim rape gangs testified that the perpetrators justified the abuses in Islamic terms. “Many times I was told that the Quran says, ‘If one of your wives disobeys you, beat her.  This was often quoted to me before they beat me with their hands. They believed they had a position of religious moral superiority over ‘nonbelievers.’ They believed it was their duty to punish us, as they believed that doing so made them good Muslims.”

This is the same thing that the girls raped by ISIS reported. A 12-year-old Yazidi girl enslaved by ISIS remembers her Muslim rapist telling her that his rape is an act of worship and that by raping her, “he is drawing closer to Allah.” Another told a 15-year-old girl that his rape is a “prayer to Allah.” But ISIS sex slavery has been happening all along across the UK.

Some of the victims in the UK were put through Islamic ‘marriage’ ceremonies in the presence of Imams and received ‘conversion certificates’ from mosques before they were raped.

But this systemic assault on hundreds of thousands of women and girls could not have happened with the complicity of leading Muslim and non-Muslim government officials.

The latest inquiry points the finger at London Mayor Sadiq Khan and even the prime minister, noting that “while Sir Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions, it has been reported that 13,000 suspected rape gang members and paedophiles were let off with warning letters.”

The report mentions Lord Nazir Ahmed who was “convicted in 2022 of multiple child sex offences, including rape of a 13-year-old girl” and noted that “survivors described him as part of the same networks that enabled Rotherham’s grooming gangs” with thousands of victims.

The cover-up of the systemic assaults and trafficking was equally systemic with the media teachers, police officers, social workers and medical professionals choosing to look away from the assaults, from severe genital trauma in little girls, from trafficking hubs in social services settings, from Muslim police officers warning victims and parents not to report the assaults.

One victim who was forcibly converted, forced to learn the Koran and undergo eight forced abortions, tried to report what was happening to the police. “She was interviewed by a Muslim officer who switched off the tape recorder and instructed her to drop her allegations because of ‘lack of evidence.’ She later learned that this officer was imprisoned for child sex offences.”

Some girls who may have been trafficked to Muslim countries are likely lost beyond recovery.

Muslim and allied police officers and social workers reported the girls to the gangs who then committed horrifying abuses to make examples out of them. “One of the worst punishments I ever witnessed involved another girl who was accused of reporting one of the men to the police… I then witnessed an iron being used on the girl’s back while it was hot. I remember seeing severe burns and skin damage to her back. My recollection is that the girl later died. I remember seeing her being strangled afterwards in that room.”

And the cover-up still continues. Even though the report notes that “87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation cases bore distinctively Muslim names”, the Starmer government and UK elites continue to deny the Islamic component of the assaults.

The report confirms that “the overwhelming majority of the rape gang networks consisted entirely of men from Muslim backgrounds – predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.” The assaults were motivated by racial and religious prejudices with the victims taunted about their race and religion. One victim was “mocked for wearing a cross and being told that ‘her Christian faith offered her no protection.’” Not in the UK, it certainly didn’t.

One single racially motivated rape of a Muslim would have set the UK on fire with investigations, trials and huge prison sentences. Yet over 250,000 Muslim rapes of non-Muslims who were told that they were worthless “white trash” or “kuffar” have led to little except more cover-ups.

And there is every reason to believe that the Mohammed Class in the UK is getting away with it.

This isn’t mere crime. This is a systemic ethnic cleansing in which the perpetrators target a racial and religious group by going after its women and girls, and enslave or convert them similar to the ‘Love Jihad’ in India or the abductions of Christian girls by Muslims in Nigeria.

This is genocide.

The earliest reported Pakistani Muslim sexual assault on an English girl took place in 1850. The earliest known Muslim sex grooming gang assault happened in 1955. 70 years later it’s still going on. The Mohammed Class is still raping girls just like these somehow across the UK.

frontpagemag

A crowdfunded independent inquiry into predominantly Pakistani grooming gangs in the United Kingdom concluded this week, calling for major legal changes to put abusers in prison for life. But major gaps still remain from this latest unofficial investigation into the decades-long scandal of systematic child rape, countless cover-ups, and internal evidence of the inaction of public servants in the face of horrific abuse of mostly young white working-class girls.

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report has called for the establishment of a specialist national prosecutor to focus on the systematic grooming and gang rape of young girls in the United Kingdom by predominantly Pakistani men, and for considerably harsher punishments for those found guilty.

The report was particularly critical of the British state, given testimony from survivors stating the authorities were often aware of the rapes, but either turned a blind eye or even sided with abusers. It stated: “The perpetrators operated with impunity because the state enabled them… The rape gangs did not operate in the shadows, but with the active or passive consent of the British state.”

In damning accusations, the Inquiry Report this week stated:

The demographic and cultural drivers are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working class girls, as property available for sexual use…

…every one of our institutions failed them catastrophically. Police forces ignored repeated reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail. Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers.

The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care. Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them. Taxi licensing authorities renewed permits for drivers who formed the logistical backbone of the networks and collapsed in the face of organised protests when basic safety measures were proposed.

The crowdfunded inquiry, which is not an official government investigation but rather an independent process headed up by MP Rupert Lowe, the leader of a small sovereigntist-right party, Restore Britain, commenced in 2025 and held public hearings of evidence in February 2026. The remarkable testimonies of survivors, in which extreme acts of sexual brutality against young children were alleged, have doubtless played an important role in keeping public attention on the grooming scandal, which the British government has been reluctant to fully address.

The inquiry also raised new concerns that hitherto had been little discussed in public. As reported during the evidence-hearings, the committee was told that “countless” British women and girls had allegedly been trafficked to Pakistan as sex slaves. Given that it was alleged to have been a widespread practice but has yet to be conclusively proven, the inquiry report called on the government to establish a specialised task force to search for missing British girls who may have been abducted and taken abroad by grooming gang abusers.

As a result of the Inquiry’s independent nature, it lacked the statutory backing of Parliament, meaning those testifying were not under oath, and it could not compel anyone to appear, nor any organisation to turn over evidence. Consequently, there remains much to be investigated. Perhaps one of the most significant missing pieces of the picture is how grooming gangs were able to operate, allegedly in full sight of the authorities, for decades.

Civil servants, police officers, medical professionals, and children’s services professionals have long been alleged to have been involved in the years-long cover-up, yet none were compelled by law to testify and turn over evidence to Lowe’s inquiry.

As reported earlier this month, Reform UK leader and potential future Prime Minister Nigel Farage called for a full Parliamentary inquiry for just this reason, saying it should use powers last activated by the post-global financial crisis Public Accounts Committee to hold the powerful to account for their actions.

Farage said of Parliament’s capabilities, if used properly: “They have powers of subpoena; it means that people can be brought into Committee Rooms like this, under oath, and could face charges of perjury if they do not tell the truth”. This power should be used to force local government, police forces, and social services to turn over 40 years of paperwork to create a “public record that everybody can read”.

Previous government inquiries, critics say, have been deliberately hobbled by the government and have also lacked statutory powers. The present government’s statutory effort has been accused of deliberate “sabotage” and has been abandoned by some survivors, who perceive a betrayal underway.

Decades after the British public first started talking about the problem of the mass rape of young girls, and 15 years after the mainstream media started to report it for the first time, much of the truth remains uncovered. That remains the case today, even after the Rape Gang Inquiry Report this week.

Indeed, even the scale of abuse is still unknown. Attempts have been made to put a number on the total number of girls attacked by grooming gangs, but after years of cover-ups and extremely poor government data collection, such estimations are questionable. The Lowe report set the baseline number of victims at 250,000 girls. However, this is merely an estimate based on a 2019 claim, calculated through imprecise extrapolations of local data to the nation as a whole. The true number of victims may be higher or lower, but will likely remain obscure until a comprehensive and statutory investigation is conducted.

The report this week acknowledged the lack of data and called for greater transparency from the government and better collection going forward. They found: “Current national data frequently lack robust recording of ethnicity and religion is even less systematically captured, limiting evidence-based analysis and responses”.

The report also called for a raft of major changes to aid further investigation and to ensure the punishment of wrongdoers. Sentencing guidelines should be reviewed, the report said, so that “group-based child sexual exploitation carries a starting point of life imprisonment”, with a minimum of 50-year sentences for ringleaders. Sentencing should consider aggravating factors such as “racial or religious motivation, multiple victims, trafficking across counties, pregnancy caused by rape, and use of filming or blackmail,” they said.

The report went on to raise the possibility of consulting the public on bringing back the death penalty “for the most heinous crimes”, something which Inquiry head Rupert Lowe MP has backed.

Given the distinct character of the vast majority of people convicted of grooming gang crimes, the report also called for deportations not just for foreigners and dual nationals convicted of actual rapes, but for those aiding and abetting too. This could include families and friends of offenders who supported, harboured, or turned a blind eye to abuse. The report also called for the dissolution of Mosques and other community organisations that harboured offenders or turned a blind eye.

To get past the alleged old status quo where investigations into rape gangs were throttled out of concern for upsetting “communities”, the report also called for the establishment of a new specialist national prosecutor under the Crown Prosecutor, arguing that “charging decisions must no longer be influenced by ‘community impact’ or fear of racism allegations”. Additionally, all frontline professionals, including police, social workers, teachers, doctors, nurses, government officials, and youth workers, should receive mandatory annual training on spotting and reporting child rape gangs, the report suggested.

Public discussion of the grooming gang scandal was strongly discouraged in the United Kingdom for decades and was attached to significant social stigma. While acknowledging its existence is now considered socially acceptable, speaking out on these issues is still subject to an omerta in some parties. Local Cambridge independent news outlet CambsNews stated Daisy Blakemore-Creedon, an erstwhile local government councillor from the region who had been drummed out of the Labour Party after speaking out, had contributed to the Grooming Gangs Report.

She is reported to have said: “A year ago I started talking about dangers in taxis after the Casey report came out – a year later I submitted evidence for the rape gang enquiry”. Blakemore-Creedon had been the youngest councillor elected in Britain when she first took a seat for the Labour Party in 2024, but she later said she’d witnessed “a culture where power can too easily go unchecked” within the local government and said she had suffered “sustained bullying and marginalisation” against her by her party colleagues.

She was accused of “targeting fellow Asian Labour councillors” and quit the party a year after her election. She said: “I feel as though I have sustained bullying and marginalisation within the group after raising serious concerns…  I was deeply disturbed to find myself accused of racism, with suggestions that I and my family were ‘targeting fellow Asian Labour councillors’.”

Blakemore-Creedon’s experience in local government hit national headlines when Labour politician Dennis Jones was suspended after it was revealed he had written to the young councillor, apparently referring to the victims of rape gangs in the notorious grooming town of Rotherham: “poor white trash in Rotherham… get a fucking grip Daisy. You are aiming for populist votes and attention… politically, I wish you no luck at all”.

The leader of the local Labour group, councillor Shabina Qayyum, dismissed Daisy’s claims, stating the local Labour party had governed in “as transparent as possible” way.

On the same day as the Rupert Lowe report was released, the government announced its process to re-investigate historic closed cases of grooming rape gangs had led to the first cases being passed back to police. Breitbart News reported in November 2025 that the National Crime Agency began reviewing over 1,200 historic cases to determine whether they may have been “incorrectly closed with no further action taken.”

The first batch, so-called, of these cases has now been handed back to police, with broadcaster Sky News stating the NCA said in a statement: “At this early stage, the reviews have identified closed cases from eight force areas that may have viable lines of inquiry. The forces have been directed to reopen these cases, to determine the next steps in relation to any reinvestigation.”

breitbart

It all began on a Sunday evening after 9 pm, when the gendarmes were called by the occupants of a flat in Figeac (Lot), who were confronted by a man armed with a knife and a grenade who was shouting: “Allahu akbar”. With more than twenty entries on his criminal record, including a conviction for aiding and abetting murder and a preventive measure against terrorist acts, the 42-year-old defendant’s past did not look favourable before the court in Cahors (Lot). The story of a chaotic evening fuelled by alcohol, set against a backdrop of a life marked by violence and multiple convictions.

“I’ve got a grenade, I’m going to explode it, we’re all going to blow up”: these death threats, made on Sunday June 7 in Figeac, led to Sébastien* facing an immediate trial on Friday June 12.

In the dock at the court in Cahors (Lot), the man insists he is innocent, explaining that he wanted to help one of his girlfriends who had been abducted by drug dealers. He had already told this to the gendarmes who intervened that Sunday. Shortly after 9 pm, the flat’s occupants had called the police to report that a man armed with a knife and a pink-and-green grenade had threatened to kill them and shouted “Allahu akbar”.

“My time is short, because it has only just begun,” replied the defendant to the judges’ questions.
“My client was drunk; that is completely incompatible with a strict observance of Islam.”

ladepeche.fr

Several high-profile cases of child sexual exploitation have triggered growing concern in Switzerland after investigators uncovered a grooming network operating from a Geneva barbershop where teenage girls were reportedly sexually abused for money over an extended period.

Swiss authorities arrested eight men during a police operation at the premises, including the business owners and suspected customers. Prosecutors allege that multiple underage girls were exploited at the shop over the course of more than a year, Junge Freiheit reported.

The youngest known victim was 14 years old, while investigators currently believe at least six minors were involved.

Authorities in Geneva and Vaud have identified about 90 young people believed to have been caught up in serious sexual exploitation. However, Marc Zingg of the Geneva cantonal police told Swiss public broadcaster SRF in December last year that the true figure could be far higher.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg. It’s difficult to say whether it’s 100, 200, or 300,” he said.

The most prominent case in recent times began with a barbershop near Geneva’s hospital. Police raided the premises in May and arrested eight adult men, including people connected to the business and alleged customers. The suspects are being investigated over alleged paid sexual acts with minors and encouraging minors into sexual exploitation. Geneva prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation and have declined to give further public details.

Zingg described the exploitation scene as “extremely secretive” and “discreet,” and said police were struggling to reach what was happening out of sight. “We don’t have it under control. It takes place underground,” he said.

In a separate video report published by SRF, a teenager identified as Sarah gave an account of her experience, who said she was 16 when she began going to the Geneva barbershop. She described a setting that began as social and then drew her into drug use and paid encounters with adult men.

“Little by little, we went there every day. The people were nice, it was a party,” she said.

Sarah said she began using cocaine and other drugs there. She also said the manager told the girls to ask for money if adult men wanted sex.

“It was the manager who told us: if they want to sleep with you, you say yes, but you ask for a banknote,” she said.

Asked whether the men could tell she was a minor, Sarah replied, “Yes. They could guess it, but they had to want to guess it.”

She said she did not regard herself as a victim at the time. “I was living my life. I said yes. Nobody forced me,” she said.

That attitude, according to specialists cited in the report, is one of the reasons these cases are difficult to uncover. Some exploited girls believe they are making their own choices or controlling the situation, while failing to recognize that adults are taking advantage of them.

Sarah said she had been sleeping rough and repeatedly running away from home during that period. She later ended up in a residential facility, but said she was still able to leave regularly. She now says she suffers nightmares and flashbacks.

“Even when I dream, scenes come back to my mind. I feel as if I am reliving them,” she said. “But I am doing my best to get through it.”

Police and social workers say social media and online advertisements are also being used to connect minors with adult men. RTS said it had seen exchanges between girls and potential customers, including a proposal for a minor to meet an adult man in a cellar in the Geneva area for 60 Swiss francs.

The recent revelations from Switzerland mirror separate investigations across Western European countries, including Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, where grooming gangs are operating far more prolifically.

Earlier this month, Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe used a Westminster Hall debate to confront MPs with harrowing testimony from White girls and women who were raped, tortured, trafficked, and degraded by migrant grooming gangs, and abandoned by the very authorities that should have protected them.

He then read out a series of graphic testimonies that exposed the scale of the abuse suffered by almost exclusively White girls. One survivor said she was only “about 12, nearly 13” when a man raped her before forcing an empty Jack Daniel’s bottle inside her and breaking the glass. Another described being held down by groups of men as they took turns to rape her, before beating her and threatening to kill her and harm her loved ones if she ever spoke out.

In one of the most disturbing accounts read to MPs, a survivor recalled seeing the back of a van opened to reveal “15, 20 girls locked in dog cages.” Another said dogs were brought in during an attack while men stood around filming, laughing, and betting on what would happen. She said she had nowhere to move and was raped by a dog while a man held her face and stared into her eyes because “he wanted to see me break.”

Lowe also read testimony from a survivor who said she was raped by “probably about six or seven hundred different men” over three years after the abuse began when she was 13. Another said abuse escalated around Eid and holidays, when parties became “bigger, worse, and more violent,” with more men and more girls involved.

Similarly disturbing accounts have also appeared across France and Germany. In the former, a new book published last month called “Lost Hearts” revealed a new crisis of teen prostitution from the town of Angoulême in the Charente region, revealing the case of local children swept up in the horrifying world of sexual exploitation.

In it, the mother of one 15-year-old girl revealed how her daughter had been forced into 10 to 12 sexual encounters per day while being kept under the heavy influence of cocaine.

“My daughter had become ‘the white doll of the blacks of the Champ de Mars. She became their thing: they made her do anything and paid with drugs,” the mother said.

Last month in Germany, Bavarian state police revealed the dismantling of a migrant grooming gang accused of exploiting underage girls by luring them with gifts, getting them hooked on hard drugs, and then demanding sex in exchange for further supplies.

In a statement published on Thursday, Bavarian Police said investigators found growing evidence that members of the drug scene were deliberately approaching young girls from unstable family and living situations. The men identified so far are described by police as predominantly of Syrian, Pakistani, and North African origin.

The suspected exploitation centered on Nelson Mandela Platz near the city’s main railway station, as well as nearby areas including Südstadt and Celtispark, which have long been known to police for drug crime.

rmx

Martin Blessing, Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s personal representative for investment promotion and former Commerzbank CEO, has stated that foreign investors are far more concerned by left-wing debates on expropriation and property rights than by rising support for the AfD.

In an interview with Handelsblatt, Blessing said: “Investors react far more sensitively to debates about interventions in property rights, such as expropriation demands in the housing market, than to high poll ratings for the AfD.”

He noted that discussions with international investors barely mention possible AfD successes in upcoming state elections in eastern Germany.

Blessing, appointed by Merz in September 2025 to attract foreign capital, added that many investors view Germany more positively than Germans do themselves.

He pointed to Austria, where the FPÖ participates in several state governments “without the economic situation having deteriorated as a result”.

The investment envoy highlighted the upcoming Berlin state election, where demands for expropriations of large housing companies by The Left (Die Linke) and parts of the Greens continue to feature prominently.

Such debates, he argued, create greater uncertainty for investors than AfD polling strength.

Blessing’s comments come as Germany struggles to attract foreign direct investment amid high energy costs, bureaucracy and political polarisation.

They also challenge the narrative that the AfD represents the main risk factor for the German economy and worry about the extreme exclusion of the party, causing more left-leaning dominance.

Chancellor Merz’s government continues to rule out any cooperation with the AfD while pursuing policies aimed at improving Germany’s attractiveness as an investment location.

brusselssignal

French activist and online commentator Thaïs d’Escufon says she could face prison for saying immigration is the number one threat to French women. In an X video posted on her page, she argues that her case demonstrates the shrinking space for free expression in France.

The case stems from statements she made on BFM TV in 2023, during a discussion about a rape involving an illegal immigrant. d’Escufon, who was herself the victim of a home invasion and sexual assault two years earlier at the hands of a Tunisian migrant, said during the segment that “The main danger for women is immigrant men, Africans, blacks, and Arabs.” 

DILCRAH (the Interministerial Delegation to Fight Against Racism, Antisemitism, and Anti-LGBT Hate) filed a complaint after that TV appearance, leading to prosecution. 

The Tribunal Judiciaire (criminal court) of Paris has scheduled the announcement of the verdict for Thursday, June 18. Prosecutors have requested a sentence of up to one year in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros for “incitement to racial hatred.” 

According to d’Escufon, one of the central reasons she has become a target of legal action is her outspoken criticism of immigration. Referring to a media clip at the center of the controversy, she stated that “the main danger for women in France is men” and specifically “immigrant men.” She argues that expressing such views has brought years of legal, social, and financial consequences.

Speaking about her experience, d’Escufon described her six years of activism as marked by media controversy, account suspensions, legal proceedings, and what she sees as systematic efforts to silence dissenting opinions. “Freedom of expression doesn’t exist,” she said.

D’Escufon says her public profile grew significantly after she became a spokesperson for the anti-immigration Génération Identitaire (GI) movement and began appearing in television debates and media interviews. GI was dissolved by President Macron in 2021, a decision confirmed by the Council of State (France’s highest administrative court), with the justification that it constituted a threat to public order, provoked hatred and discrimination, and undermined republican values and public safety.

As a young female activist speaking on immigration and national identity, she quickly attracted national attention. That attention, she claims, was followed by a wave of censorship. Social media platforms repeatedly suspended her accounts, eventually removing her from Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and other mainstream networks. 

D’Escufon said multiple banks also refused to provide her with banking services,  without giving any clear explanations. During one attempt to open an account, she says a warning message concerning her public profile appeared on a bank employee’s computer screen, leading her to believe that her political activism had made her effectively blacklisted.

In addition to social media bans and banking difficulties, d’Escufon says she has faced several legal proceedings because of her political statements. She has already received a six-month suspended prison sentence and a €3,000 fine in one case, while continuing to pursue appeals through the courts.

Throughout her testimony, she argues that the pressure placed upon her is not merely political disagreement but a broader effort to isolate critics of immigration. “They are trying to kill us socially and economically,” she said.

europeanconservative

Two major fires struck a chapel in Brittany and a cathedral cloister in southwestern France, causing extensive damage to the historic Catholic heritage sites.

On June 12, two separate fires severely damaged the Sainte-Anne Chapel in Trégastel, Brittany, and the former cloister of Condom Cathedral in Gers within hours of one another. The incidents resulted in the destruction of large sections of the historic buildings and the loss of archival material. Investigations into the causes are ongoing.

“For the moment, we are above all very sad,” Trégastel Mayor Annie Macé said, according to a report by Tribune Chrétienne, summarizing local reaction to the loss.

The first fire broke out in the early afternoon at the Sainte-Anne-des-Rochers Chapel in Trégastel, located in the Côtes-d’Armor department of Brittany. The blaze rapidly spread through the roof of the 17^th  century building, causing extensive damage. Approximately 75 percent of the roof was destroyed, with part of the timber framework collapsing during the fire.

Thirty-two firefighters from several emergency centers in the region responded to the incident. They fought the fire for more than an hour using four hoses, including one mounted on an aerial ladder. Fire crews remained on site into the evening to extinguish remaining hotspots beneath the debris.

Despite the scale of the damage, all artwork and liturgical objects housed inside the chapel were successfully removed and preserved. Firefighters evacuated statues, including three protected as historic monuments, before municipal services took custody of the rescued items.

The chapel, built in 1635 and dedicated to Saint Anne, patroness of Brittany, already suffered structural defects. The building had been closed to the public since March 2026 over concerns about the condition of its timber framework.

Several witnesses reported different observations concerning the possible origin of the fire. Some suggested that flames first appeared on one side of the building, while others pointed to the belfry. Authorities have not reached any conclusion, and a gendarmerie investigation has been opened to determine the exact circumstances of the incident.

Later the same day, another major fire struck the media library housed within the former cloister of the Cathedral of Condom in the Gers department of southwestern France.

During the initial stages of the fire, flames reportedly rose more than 23 feet into the air, causing significant damage to the cathedral complex and resulting in the destruction of part of the city’s archival holdings. Among the losses were historic volumes dating back to the 16^th century.

The two fires occurred independently of one another, and no connection between the incidents has been reported. In both cases, investigators are still working to establish the causes of the fires.

The events have drawn attention to the condition of religious heritage sites across France. Local officials, preservation associations, and heritage specialists have for years expressed concern about the maintenance challenges facing many churches, chapels, and other historic religious buildings, particularly in smaller municipalities where restoration costs can exceed available resources.

French heritage advocate Stéphane Bern recently called for greater support for rural religious monuments. “One finds €900 million for Notre-Dame, but one cannot find the first €1,000 for the churches of our countryside. An emergency plan must be implemented to save the religious heritage of rural France,” he said.

lifesitenews

by Giulio Meotti

Once, Americans could always count on a warm welcome in Normandy. Even when the rest of France turned its back on them, at least the locals remembered who had liberated them in 1944 – and at a horrendous cost in soldiers’ deaths.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, speaking from Colleville-sur-Mer in Normandy where he attended the D-Day commemorations, said:

“On these beaches we saved the West. Today, European beaches are being stormed by various dangerous ideologies: on the beaches of Spain, Italy, Greece, and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive. Will the European capitals act against this invasion, or is it already too late?”

In November, the U.S. State Department had warned that “mass immigration represents an existential threat to Western civilization and undermines the stability of key American allies.”

In his speech at the Munich Conference, Secretary of State Marco Rubio delved deeper into the issue: “We opened our doors to an unprecedented wave of mass immigration that threatens the cohesion of our societies, the continuity of our culture, and the future of our people.”

Then Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old student from Southampton, England, was murdered by Vickrum Singh Digwa, a British Sikh, with the English police not believing him when he said he had been stabbed.

Then Belfast descended into chaos after a Sudanese refugee tried to behead an Irishman in the street.

The United States, which has its own border and identity problems, at least retains the instincts of a nation. It has understood that uncontrolled immigration erodes the social contract, shatters the sense of belonging, and sets the stage for conflicts that no “diversity is our strength” rhetoric can quell.

Europe, on the other hand, considers any border control a return to 1933. It is lethal moral blackmail.

Europe is surrendering to the intellectual stupidity of people like Annie Ernaux, the Nobel Prize-winning novelist who, wearing the inevitable Palestinian Arab keffiyeh, campaigned for Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s pro-Islamic left, saying from Saint-Denis: “The city of dead and living kings. The time of kings was one of privileges of birth. It was the time of women being absolute property of men.”

Poor fool: what does she think will happen to women under sharia?

Shortly before that, there was yet another sack of Paris on the pretext of a PSG victory.

Scenes of riots, chain destructions, cars set on fire, hundreds injured – including law enforcement – and one dead. A foretaste of what cities will be like when the latent civil war we are living in moves to the hot phase.

But the cult of relativism continues to rage in institutional circles. Same ritual. Same emptiness. The leaders talk. The streets burn. These two realities will never meet. There is a word for what these European people are experiencing. That word is abandonment.

-A system in which political leaders – “leaders” here is a figure of speech – massively import a foreign population with a culture that cannot assimilate and without asking themselves whether the graft will take.

-A system that installs these populations in already fragile neighborhoods and calls it integration.

-A system that moves undesirables from country to country, from Paris to Belfast, stamping documents along the way.

And when the pressure cooker explodes, the same system brings out its “experts” and “columnists” to explain that the real violence is that of the person who snapped, not the violence that made them snap.

The Italian Foreign Ministry has explicitly issued travel warnings against going to Afghanistan and Sudan, yet it allows young, cocky men from those very nations to enter Italy.

For Europe all that remains is the choice between a dignified defense – repatriations, stopping the boats, ending migrant welfare, assimilation or return – of our own home, or being resigned to becoming a minority in lands built by our ancestors.

israelnationalnews

Behave, or be gone.

Out of all the countries affected by the suicidal Globalist policies allowing for unchecked mass migration, former liberal paradise Sweden may have been the society that changed most drastically.

And now, there is an understanding that the avalanche of robbery, murder, and rape – as catastrophic as it is – is not the only problem assailing their culture.

The basic bad behavior of migrants and the unwillingness to assimilate are fraying the Swedish social fabric just as much.

So, yesterday (15), the Swedish parliament approved a law allowing authorities to revoke immigrants’ residency permits based on bad behavior.

This can mean ‘having unpaid debts, doing undeclared work, or ‌links to extremist organizations.’

🇸🇪 Sweden has passed a "good behavior" law allowing migrants to be deported over non-criminal conduct such as tax debts or extremist links.

This will allow the Swedish government the power to revoke residence permits and deport legal immigrants without a specific criminal… pic.twitter.com/tcCBS9QGa0

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) June 16, 2026

Reuters reported:

“The law, which covers pending permits but also retroactively already granted permits, is part of a wider tightening of immigration ​rules by the right-wing government and its support party, ​the nationalist Sweden Democrats, ahead of a parliamentary election ⁠in September.

The law has been criticized by the opposition and ​human rights advocacy groups as arbitrary because decisions would be taken ​on behavior that has not been deemed criminal.

‘The good behavior law leaves people in uncertainty about what actions or expressions can be used against ​them’, Stockholm-based group Civil Rights Defenders said in a statement. It ​undermines the rule of law and the principle of equality before the ‌law.”

SWEDEN JUST DREW THE LINE

Sweden is doing it. Finally.

Parliament has just passed a law that lets the state revoke residence permits for bad behavior. And here is the part that matters – the behavior does not have to be criminal.

Undeclared work. Unpaid debts. Tax evasion.… pic.twitter.com/JJ0ERLjPKk

— Krisztina Maria (@KrisztinaMaria) June 16, 2026

Sky News reported:

“The government, which won the 2022 election on a promise to reduce immigration and crack down on crime, has said that people who misbehave or commit crimes are not welcome in Sweden.

The Migration Agency is tasked with reviewing the permits and the decisions can be appealed to a migration court.

‘Anyone who doesn’t make the effort to do the right thing shouldn’t be able to count on staying’, Minister of Migration Johan Forssell said when he proposed the bill in March.”

thegatewaypundit

by J.B. Shurk 

British tyranny is so repulsive that the British people owe it to themselves to overthrow their government masters.  It has been two-hundred-fifty years since America’s Declaration of Independence recognized the Crown system as a threat to Americans’ lives and liberties.  English-speaking peoples still suffering under the British yoke should follow suit. 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a near-total ban on social media for children under sixteen years old.  Ten of the most popular social media platforms are now age-restricted, with the toxic-leftist Bluesky platform a notable exception.  The government claims to be “protecting children” from online harm.  That’s a lie.  If the British government cared about protecting British children, government ministers and police forces would not have covered up Islamic rape gangs targeting children for three-plus decades.  The British government would not censor online reporting of foreigners murdering young Brits.  The British government has systematically chosen to sacrifice the United Kingdom’s children.  

This online “safety” measure must be understood, then, as a ruse meant to expand the government’s control over online information.  Australia, New Zealand, and Canada have similar surveillance systems in place — all ostensibly erected to “protect the children” but designed, in reality, to control the speech of citizens.  In these countries, the only way to communicate with other citizens on social media platforms is to prove your age by proving your identity.  Mandatory digital identification systems are disguised as child welfare checks.  The Brits and their Commonwealth vassals have built a surveillance system to monitor citizens’ thoughts, censor unapproved speech, and promote official propaganda.   

Tyrant Starmer is pushing this online surveillance infrastructure while citizens in the U.K. are protesting and rioting against the British government’s murderous mass immigration policies — which have invited foreign rapists and killers to overrun the kingdom and slaughter citizens.  

Third-world barbarism is exploding across Europe.  Official Eurostat numbers show that sexual violence offenses in the European Union have doubled over the last decade.  Rapes skyrocketed 150%.  Knife crimes and murders are off the charts.  Foreign nationals who have immigrated into Europe are responsible for roughly fifty percent of violent crime.  

Just as the unelected European Commission ruling the continent continues to cover up immigrant crimes and censor citizens’ online discussion of these ongoing threats, the British government is more concerned about punishing native Brits for noticing that they are under attack than repelling violent invaders from Britain’s shores.  (If Keir Starmer had been in Winston Churchill’s shoes during the Nazi Blitz, the British government would have surely helped the Germans cover up the bombings while blaming all the destruction on British citizens!)  

Starmer’s government spies run a propaganda outfit that controls all public “narratives” regarding immigrant crime against native Brits.  The group of spies write and release misleading statements, presented as coming from the families of victims, that are designed to downplay rapes, murders, and other violent incidents.  While these spies use propaganda and censorship to cover up serious crimes committed by immigrants, they simultaneously engage in information warfare against British citizens by branding legitimate public concerns over safety as “disinformation,” “far-right racism,” “violence,” and “hate speech.”  This spy group in charge of monitoring and shaping the public’s thoughts has flagged “reading Shakespeare, Chaucer or Milton, or books documenting grooming gang scandals as potential indicators of far-Right susceptibility.”  The British spies — a veritable Gestapo fabricating public “truth” — plant media stories, steer online discussions, and deploy operatives to disrupt or direct public protests. 

The British government claims the power to block “false information” that is “legal but harmful.”  On its website, the British government defines “extreme right-wing terrorist ideology” to include the belief that “‘Western culture’ is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups.”  British Technology Secretary Liz Kendall claims that it is “illegal” to promote “disorder” on social media.  Meanwhile, Starmer’s government tyrants are instructing journalists how to report immigrant attacks on British citizens.  These are the actions of dictators who do not care about “protecting the children.”

Surveying the daily violent crime by immigrants and the British government’s ongoing cover-ups, former Prime Minister Liz Truss says there is a government campaign to “undermine the family” and the “nation state.”  She says that forced diversity has corrupted the institutions and that government ministers suppress information and attack citizens while protecting barbarians.  She concludes that mass migration and government control over information are being used as weapons to destroy Western civilization.

For years, we Americans have watched the evils of globalism expand both at home and abroad in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and most of continental Europe.  Branded by its international supporters as some kind of final, utopian stage of human governance, globalism is just another Frankensteinian beast — created from all the worst parts of Marxist-communism, Leninism, Maoism, fascism, Nazism, authoritarianism, oligarchy, corporatism, elitism, and central bank hegemony.  Globalism is totalitarianism.  Its god is government, although it has created special liturgical rituals regarding an imaginary “climate change” apocalypse meant to scare the world’s peasants into accepting the supremacy of government authority and bureaucrats’ (globalism’s “priests”) centralized power over all economic transactions.

Globalist governments seek total control over the people, and every policy that globalist governments shove down our throats is meant to advance this goal of total control.  COVID was not a health emergency.  It was a government excuse to roll out digital identifications, mandatory pharmaceutical injections, “vaccine” passports capable of monitoring real-time citizen movements, and online censorship.  It was a government program meant to condition citizens to accept that government bureaucrats should be empowered with limitless authorities — including the discretion to regulate church services, close and bankrupt businesses, lockdown citizens in their homes, separate family members from dying loved ones, and quarantine citizens for non-compliance.  The “global warming/cooling/climate change/extreme weather” hobgoblin is a government-designed scare tactic identical to the COVID “emergency.”  The only difference is that the “global warming” fearmongers have been telling us that we have twelve years left to live for the last century, while the COVID fearmongers told us that we had twelve days to live unless we complied.  Manufacturing compliance was and remains globalist governments’ only strategic objective.

Globalism’s ruling elites lust for wealth, power, and total control over the public.  Their lust will never be sated.  They wish for a small collection of government and economic masters to subjugate as much of the planet’s population as possible as serfs.  Globalism is a conquering empire.  Its oligarchy of central bank popes, chosen political governors, corporate monarchs, and techno-fascist-brownshirt-bureaucrats are modern-day slavers and colonizers.  Instead of putting us in chains and whipping us when we “misbehave,” they put us in a lifetime of debt and prosecute us for expressing opinions contrary to official government orthodoxy.  

Do you believe that marriage is an institution recognizing the sacred union between one man and one woman?  Do you believe that men and women are biologically different?  Do you believe that mass immigration is a threat to national security?  Do you believe “multiculturalism” and forced “diversity” destroy excellence, discount merit, and weaken the naturally salubrious bonds of common cultural heritage?  Do you believe that every human has a God-given right to self-defense?  Do you believe that Christians should remain faithful to their beliefs in both their public and private lives?  If so, globalist governments see you as an “extremist,” “right-winger,” “religious fanatic,” “terrorist,” and “enemy of the State.”  Your thoughts will be condemned.  Your speech will be censored.  You will be fined and prosecuted.  You will go to prison for your beliefs.  

The best way for Americans to fight encroaching globalism over here is to support British patriots in their fight against globalism over there.  As Benjamin Franklin persuasively argued, “We must all hang together, or we shall all hang separately.”

americanthinker