Allah's Willing Executioners

EU citizens are receiving benefits and free housing after claiming asylum in the UK, new figures have revealed.

In March, nearly 150 EU migrants were living in state-funded contingency accommodation, including hotels, while their asylum claims were being processed by the Home Office.

Seventy-five Americans who had claimed asylum in the UK were housed in taxpayer-funded accommodation and receiving a weekly allowance of £49.18 for food, clothing and toiletries.

A further 20 asylum seekers from Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Japan were also in state-funded accommodation as of March 31, 2026, according to Home Office data.

Many of those claiming asylum from these countries are doing so on the basis of racial, religious or gender discrimination, despite originating from nations with strong human rights records and stable governments, the Telegraph reports.

Home Office officials confirmed the vast majority of asylum claims from EU countries, the US and other safe nations were rejected or withdrawn, with only three per cent granted last year.

However, under current immigration law, the Home Office is required to provide accommodation and financial support to any migrant deemed “destitute” and unable to meet their own living costs, regardless of where they come from.

The cases include a Lithuanian man named Sami Tumarevic, who was due to be deported following a six-year prison sentence for armed robbery but claimed asylum in 2023 in an attempt to prevent his removal.

He argued his life would be at risk in Lithuania due to his “ethnic and genetic makeup” and claimed he would face danger from police there.

His claim was ruled inadmissible, but he managed to delay his removal further by bringing a judicial review of the decision, which was dismissed in October 2024.

Among those who received free accommodation and benefits is Olabode Shoniregun, 27, a university-educated American from Las Vegas who claimed he was being persecuted in the US because he was black, Jewish and a member of the Mormon Church.

Mr Shoniregun was housed in migrant hotels while his claim was considered, before it was rejected last summer.

Despite the rejection, he has received thousands of pounds in accommodation and state support and has not yet been removed from the country.

The Home Office figures showed there were 156 American applicants for British asylum last year, making the US the safe country with the largest number of claimants.

It was followed by Poland with 88 applications, Romania with 68, Hungary with 41 and Lithuania with 26, alongside smaller numbers from Italy, Portugal, Spain, Canada, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, New Zealand, Germany and Australia.

Neil O’Brien, shadow minister for policy renewal and development, who obtained the data, said many people would be “surprised” the Government even entertained asylum claims from nationals of these countries, let alone provided them with taxpayer-funded housing.

He said: “These people are basically economic migrants shopping around. They are likely originally from third countries but have already got nationality in very rich and safe countries and now want to come to the UK.

“There is no way you can credibly claim that the government of New Zealand or Sweden is a threat to your life.”

Even where asylum claims are rejected, Home Office data showed that annual removal rates for failed claimants varied significantly, ranging from just 25 per cent for those from New Zealand and France to 81 per cent for those from Sweden and Romania.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp described the situation as “a disgraceful waste of taxpayers’ money”.

He said the EU and US were “manifestly safe” and asylum claims from such countries should be immediately dismissed without a penny of public money being spent on housing applicants.

A Home Office spokesman said: “Most asylum claims from these countries are rejected or withdrawn, with just 3 per cent of applications granted asylum in the last year. Asylum claims are assessed on individual merit, and those found not to need protection will be refused.

“The Government has already reduced the number of asylum seekers in asylum hotels by 35 per cent in the past year.

“Overall asylum support costs are down by 15 per cent in the last financial year – helping reduce asylum support costs by nearly £1bn.”

gbnews

Two trans-identified males were jailed on the same day for committing sexual crimes in the United Kingdom. Convicted pedophile “Jessica Smith,” of Devon, England, tried to communicate online with a 12-year-old ‘girl’ but didn’t realize the child was really an undercover police officer, while “Paula” Paul Stanton masturbated in front of nurses at a hospital in Cardiff, Wales.

46-year-old Smith pleaded guilty on Monday to two attempts to incite a child to sexual activity and was jailed for four years an four months. Smith also admitted four breaches of the Sexual Harm Prevention Order for creating internet accounts while banned and having a laptop without having informed police. Presiding Judge Stephen Climie said there was a “significant element of mental ill-health” and warned that Smith poses a risk of committing further sex crimes in the future.

Smith, a repeat offender, was previously convicted in April 2021 during a sting in Sidbury. At the time, Smith sent a stream of sexual messages and images to what he believed to be two 14-year-old schoolgirls which were in fact decoys set up by a group called Justice for the Tears.

Smith claimed the photos were of his genitals, and even asked one of the girls to bring along a 12-year-old friend to a meetup. The pedophile hunters discovered Smith hiding in the bushes near the rendezvous location.

At Exeter Crown Court, Smith admitted to three counts of attempting to incite a child to sexual activity and one of arranging to commit a child sex offense. He was jailed for two years and ten months and put on the sex offenders register for life.

A claim of “gender dysphoria” was leveraged on Smith’s behalf. During sentencing, Judge Peter Johnson said that a “psychiatric report is of the opinion that your long-standing gender dysphoria and issues of sexual identity contributed to your anxiety and depression.”

However, he added: “The facts of the case are straightforward. You thought you were talking to someone aged 14 on social media and within ten minutes you turned the conversation to sexual matters.”

It was noted that in 2018, Smith also made contact fake profiles which had been set up online and purported to be 14-year-old girls.

Reporting on the 2021 conviction, local outlet Sidmouth Herald repeatedly referred to Smith simply as a “woman.”

On the same day that Smith was convicted, a trans-identified male who uses the name “Paula” was jailed for masturbating in front of nurses at the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff.

Paul Stanton, 62, a Falklands War veteran, had been taken to the hospital on May 17 for a mental health assessment over concerns over a threat to self-harm. The court heard that he began to masturbate while making eye contact with a nurse. During proceedings, Stanton, who has has 12 previous convictions for 19 offenses, was referred to with feminine pronouns.

Lewis Ball, prosecuting, said: “The defendant put her hands down her leggings to the groin area. Staff could see that she had her penis in her hand and that her hand was moving up and down. This was happening on and off. He made eye contact with one nurse while he was doing it. Hospital security was called but when they arrived, it had stopped.”

Stanton was jailed in August 2024 for 12 months for two counts of committing an act outraging public decency. On that occasion, Stanton had been spotted touching himself sexually in his flat window as women walked past. At the time, he was wearing a black bra and women’s underwear under his dressing gown.

Newport Crown Court was told that one of the women later found a note on her car, left by Stanton, which read: “Please keep looking at the flats. Paula wants to show you her underwear. It turns Paula on.”

In a victim statement, one of the women said: “The whole incident left me feeling disturbed and I think about the effect on a young child if they had seen it. It makes me feel sick.”

Stanton admitted behaving in the manner he did for sexual gratification and pleaded guilty to two counts of outraging public decency, for which he was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment. Prior offenses committed by Stanton followed a similar pattern.

Stanton was previously handed a suspended sentence of six months imprisonment after he exposed himself to a woman. The sex offender performed a sex act in his car while following a woman, who described him as wearing women’s underwear. She said he had been “staring and grinning” at her.

Frightened, the woman hid in a shop. However, Stanton continued to follow her, exited his car, and pulled up his shirt while continuing to touch himself. He had also been previously convicted of outraging public decency in relation to a sexual offense involving children in a playground.

135 British MPs are fighting guidance that would deny ‘Paula’ the right to enter women’s and girls’ changing rooms. pic.twitter.com/03XRZfMz2F

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 16, 2026

News reports on both men’s convictions caused a wave of controversy on social media as many news outlets referred to the sexual predators by feminine pronouns in their coverage.

The Barry and District News in particular drew the ire of women’s rights advocates on X after repeating the term “her penis” in their article on Stanton’s conviction.

“This @barrydistrict story is an embarrassment to journalism,” journalist Janet Murray wrote in a post that attracted over 120,000 views. “Readers are told a ‘woman’ masturbated in front of nurses.”

This @barrydistrict story is an embarrassment to journalism.

Readers are told a "woman" masturbated in front of nurses. They are then told the prosecutor said:

"The defendant put her hands down her leggings to the groin area. Staff could see that she had her penis in her hand… pic.twitter.com/VQ35iVMTXR

— Janet Murray (@jan_murray) June 15, 2026

“Seriously folks, stop getting any news from any source that reports ‘her penis in her hand…’ – even as a direct quote from a prosecutor who should also know better,” Dr. Zoe Harcombe added on the outlet’s coverage of Stanton. “If you don’t know what a woman is, you shouldn’t be trusted on anything.”

reduxx

by Giulio Meotti

“Israel has become the most boycotted country in the world,” headlines an investigation by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth. Along with its right wing ministers (Itamar Ben-Gvir), antisemites are boycotting its leftist directors (Nadav Lapid), its pacifist writers (Eshkol Nevo) and its universities. The New York Times has run an article on writers who can’t find publishers and book fairs that can’t find authors to invite.

Yet while Israeli culture is treated like contaminated goods, its weapons are courted without shame.

Meanwhile, at Eurosatory, the major arms fair in Paris, barriers have been erected around the stands of Israeli defence companies. “The French say it’s because of Gaza,” an Israeli executive told The Economist, “but their real problem is that we’re competing for contracts – and we’re winning.” He added that even Macron’s presidential jet uses an Israeli system to protect itself from anti-aircraft missiles.

Israel is expecting new orders for air and missile defence systems from European countries in the near future, a senior Israeli Defence Ministry official revealed to Reuters. Demand continues to grow as European nations perceive a greater threat from Russia and seek to strengthen their air defences.

“There is enormous interest from Western Europe,” said Moshe Patel, director general of the Israel Missile Defence Organization. Israel has sold its Arrow air defence system – designed to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles such as the Russian Oreshnik – to Germany. Finland has purchased the shorter-range David’s Sling system, designed to shoot down ballistic missiles launched from 100 to 200 kilometres away, as European countries prepare for a possible Russian aggression.

“It’s mainly due to what’s happening between Russia and Ukraine,” Patel said. “Naturally they are watching very closely what is happening in Iran, and anything that works against Russia could also work against Iran. Whatever they do will be useful against all these types of threats.”

Patel said there is also interest in the Iron Dome, designed to neutralise short-range threats. “It represents an enormous advantage for those nations that have enemies on their borders: this is its main capability, along with the ability to protect a city or a strategic area,” he added.

When Macron accused the Germans of promoting a “third-party industry at the expense of European sovereignty” for buying an Israeli missile defence system instead of the one France is developing with Italy, German officials simply shrugged. “Russian ballistic missiles represent an immediate threat,” the Germans say, and Israel was able to offer a battle-tested system, while the French one is still on paper.

Israel is now the world’s seventh-largest arms exporter. It supplies more weapons to Germany and Britain than France does, accounting for 55% of German imports and 8.2% of British ones. Israel is such a military power that it sells more arms to European NATO states than France itself – which is in Europe and in NATO. Israel is the third-largest supplier to European NATO armies.

Say it again: Israel is the third-largest supplier to European NATO armies.

Boycotting the culture of the Middle East’s only democracy – its liberal, pluralistic, hyper-critical and pacifist culture – is easy. Doing without its weapons is harder. Boycotting culture costs nothing: it only requires the virtue of a public gesture and puts no one’s security at risk. Giving up the most effective weapons, on the other hand, has a price that European defence ministries, faced with the Russian shadow and Middle Eastern instability, do not seem willing to pay.

The distinction between what can be condemned in words and what must be purchased in silence reveals, more than any statement, where ideologies end and where the calculus of survival begins – and the sentinel and laboratory role that Israel plays for Western democracies.

How do you defend a culture? For Israel, also with weapons. For a certain West, with trigger warnings and safe spaces.

And while the Pentagon is reportedly ready to reduce the number of fighter jets deployed in Europe, according to the New York Times, European air defense is a mosaic of American Patriots and the Israeli Iron Dome.

And what about active protection systems for European tanks? Israel’s Trophy system, mounted on American Abrams, German Leopards, and British Challengers. And the targeting pod, the target acquisition system? From Rafael, used by air forces across Europe.

And counter-drone systems? A market dominated by Israeli and American companies.Israel has faced drones from Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, the Houthis, and other Iran-backed actors. It has seen the skies over Tel Aviv become crowded and dangerous. When European governments ask how to defend airports, bases, cities, and troops, it is hardly surprising that Israeli solutions are so appealing.

Since October 7, 2023, Israel has been fighting on seven fronts simultaneously against a network equipped with Russian S-300 air defense systems, Chinese ballistic missiles, and Iranian drone technology.

Israel cannot afford the luxury of weakness. Can Europe?

israelnationalnews

The United Kingdom now has thugs in uniform patrolling the streets, threatening anyone who’s seen as problematic to their Islamic faith.

Several exchanges are going viral from Harrow, London, between two enforcement officers and the public. These are not police officers per se, but uniformed individuals who can issue fines. The London Borough of Harrow lists infractions like littering, not cleaning up after a dog, dumping refuse in inappropriate places, and breaching protection orders among fineable offenses.

Apparently, speaking about Muhammad in a manner deemed negative by officers is grounds for aggression, at least in the view of the two individuals shown here.

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Harrow, London

“I swear when I’m not in Uniform I’m gonna knock you the F out”

Local friendly council workers engaged with members of the public.

Ask yourself what happens when they become the majority of the Police, stewards, security guards, traffic… pic.twitter.com/xyCVAo1pH1

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 13, 2026

One of the officers restrained the other, while telling the man filming, “Come into the alleyway right now, I’ll show you what time it is.”

“We’re going to make sure you can’t work no more and earn no money, because you’re trying to butt in with our money.”

Note the beginning of the exchange as well. The first officer appears to cover his camera, and the second one tries to see if it’s on. The first one says, “No, no, no, it’s off.”

The men appear to try to get the man to follow them, possibly to attack him, based on their language. No longer leaving it to chance, he was told, “I’m going to knock you the f*** out and rip your teeth out.”

The officer once again repeated that he would “show you what time it is, come now.”

Looking at the footage around the 11-second mark, the man filming is holding a pamphlet, possibly on Muhammad, but it’s unclear who gave it to him or if he was passing it out.

The Post Millennial’s Andy Ngo posted a statement from the borough, where all operations by the organization these men worked for had been suspended while the two men had been reported to the police.

Update: The London council where the Muslim council officers had threatened violence against a man on the street has suspended working with the company it contracted with. https://t.co/1FWO8hYgXE

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) June 17, 2026

More footage began circulating on Instagram of the duo — if the timeline is correct — still working after the statement’s release.

Here they are acting as aggressively as the first video.

According to a caption and the men talking to one of the officers in another video, he kept urging a group to “come to the park to talk.”

The enforcement officer is still wearing a body camera and seems to wrongly be under the impression that ambiguous language to threaten people will give him deniability.

Is this the “enrichment” liberals swoon over when they talk about immigrant populations? These men are clearly on a power trip.

They’ve taken a job as Britain’s equivalent to glorified mall cops and tried to turn it into Islam’s paramilitary.

It would be easy to say, “This is Europe, not an Islamic country,” but more accurately, it’s not an Islamic country yet. 

Deport every last one of these people.

There are plenty of Muslim countries they can reside in where blaspheming against Muhammad will earn the perpetrator a beating or worse.

Britain must never be one of them.

The Western Journal.

A number of local authorities across England have warned residents not to display England flags on public property during the World Cup, prompting criticism from those who see the measures as an attack on expressions of national pride.

Councils including Bristol, South Gloucestershire and Wiltshire have reminded residents that flags and banners should not be attached to lampposts, railings, road signs or other publicly owned infrastructure without permission.

South Gloucestershire Council told residents in a recent newsletter that while many people would want to support teams competing in the tournament, any decorations should only be displayed on private property.

“We know many residents will want to show their support for teams and countries competing in the World Cup,” the council said.

“To make sure this is done safely and lawfully, any items, including flags, should only be displayed on your own private property and must not cause obstruction, damage, or concern to others.”

Residents were directed to guidance on the council’s website stating that the rules are intended to protect public safety, prevent damage to public assets and maintain community cohesion, rather than limit free speech.

A similar message was issued in Bristol by the city’s Green Party council leader, Tony Dyer, who urged residents to restrict displays to their own homes.

“What people cannot do is fly flags on lampposts or railings or any public property,” Dyer said.

“Please do not attach anything to lampposts – it causes health and safety issues.”

Bristol City Council has said it will prioritise the removal of flags in what it describes as “sensitive locations”.

The issue has attracted particular attention in Bristol, home to Torrington Avenue, a street that has repeatedly been described as one of England’s most patriotic.

Yet the issue was not contentious during previous tournaments, where residents decorated the road with dozens of St George’s flags to show support for the England team.

Wiltshire Council has also warned residents that flags attached to road furniture may be removed.

Councillor Martin Smith, the authority’s Cabinet Member for Highways and Streetscene, said: “With major sporting events such as the World Cup bringing communities together, many residents will want to show their support by displaying England flags and decorations.

“We are all willing the England team on to end 60 years of hurt and bring the trophy home.”

“However, we would like to remind residents that placing items such as banners, bunting or flags on or near the public highway – including lampposts, road signs and roundabouts – without permission can pose safety risks to road users and pedestrians. It can also obstruct visibility.”

The debate touches on wider questions about the meaning of England’s national flag and how it is perceived in Britain today.

For many people, the St George’s Cross remains a straightforward symbol of national identity and support for England’s sporting teams. Others argue that the flag has been appropriated by anti-immigration and far-right groups.

The issue spilled into public debate during demonstrations organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson, where St George’s flags were displayed.

In a blog post published last year, Bristol City Council leader Tony Dyer addressed the controversy surrounding the St George’s flag.

“We know that right now our St George’s flag, which should be a symbol of pride, is being used by some to represent anti-migrant campaigns of misinformation and hate,” he wrote.

“The irony of this becomes clear when we realise that St George himself was a migrant from what is now Turkey to Palestine,” he added.

brusselssignal

A mother has gone to the German media with the story of her 12-year-old son, Eren, who was beaten, stripped, sexually abused, and whipped with a belt by migrant youths during a variety of different incidents that occurred over the course of weeks in the Swabia region of Germany.

The woman, 38-year-old Ilknur S. said the majority of the abuse occurred during a school trip at a ski camp in Kleinwalsertal, Austria, which involved two 13-year-old classmates. The trip was organized by the Bismarck School in Memmingen.

“The fear of this boy made him sick,” said the mother to Bild newspaper.

The perpetrators even published videos of their abuse and uploaded them to social media channels, including TikTok.

“There were five teachers present. Why didn’t anyone notice that my son was being tormented for a week?” the mother asked. “Here, the duty of supervision was massively violated.”

Eren was allegedly repeatedly beaten with a belt until he was black and blue inside his accommodation during the trip. The main perpetrator, an Afghan, has already been expelled from the school while the Syrian played the role of an accomplice, according to the police.

During the torture sessions, he was also partially undressed and sexually coerced. More details about what this exactly entailed have not been disclosed. However, videos of the abuse were uploaded to TikTok.

Initially, when Eren came home, he told his mother that bruises were from falling while skiing, but eventually, the truth came out when the school principal informed the mother what happened on April 24.

The principal informed her that the torture had been ongoing for weeks but the peak of the abuse occurred during the ski trip. The Afghan also confessed to the acts.

Due to the age of the suspects, they are below the age of criminal responsibility in Germany, which means they will face no legal repercussions. Nevertheless, police spokesperson Alexander Heubuch confirmed that an investigation is underway regarding coercion, assault, and the violation of privacy through the recording of intimate images.

However, the mother continues to be furious with the school administration.

“I expect the school administration to ensure that my child never has to encounter the two perpetrators again. My son suffered from sleep disturbances, stomach pain, and nausea for weeks. The fear of these boys made him ill,” she stated.

The school, however, is declining to comment, citing data protection standards for those involved. The name of the mother and child were changed by Bild to protect their identities.

The case all received some attention from Elon Musk, who replied to a post from Austrian political activist and the head of the Remigration Institute, Martin Sellner, who stated: “Germans are forced to pay everything for these people, and then their own children are raped and tortured by them in schools. Send them all back. They have no reason to be in Europe.”

A 12-year-old student from Bavaria was tortured for weeks by his Afghan and Syrian illegals.

He was whipped with his belt and sexually humiliated. The videos were posted online.

Germans are forced to pay everything for these people, and then their own children are raped and… pic.twitter.com/iaKmG8jqWE

— Martin Sellner (@MartinSellner_) June 17, 2026

Overall, school violence is soaring in Germany, in large part due to mass immigration. In addition, German students are increasingly becoming the victims of bullying in schools across the country as they head towards minority status.

Data shows that in Germany, 150 teachers and students are physically attacked, threatened, and insulted every single day. That amounts to a 37 percent increase since 2022. Data has also shown that 40 percent of all crime suspects in German schools are foreigners and that there are also two knife-related crimes in German schools every day.

Data shows that even outside of schools, crime from youths with a migration background has exploded in the country, all while German youths are becoming more peaceful.

Similar cases involving migrant youths terrorizing Germans have long been covered by Remix News. At the same time, German educational standards, respect in the classrooms, and even basic skills like students tying their own shoes are rapidly deteriorating.

rmx

As Peter McIlvenna reported earlier, the 219-page Rape Gang Inquiry Report, released on June 16, 2026, was led by Restore MP Rupert Lowe and survivor advocate Sammy Woodhouse. Funded by more than 20,000 British supporters, this investigation reveals a major failure in child protection. It documents the systematic grooming, rape, trafficking, and abuse of at least 250,000 vulnerable White British girls by mostly Muslim Pakistani gangs throughout the UK.

The report’s main finding is clear. Organized groups, with 87-95% of convicted offenders having Muslim names, mostly of Pakistani background, targeted girls as young as 11 from unstable homes and care systems. Groomers used gifts, alcohol, drugs, and attention to lure victims, then took them to various locations for repeated abuse. They filmed the abuse for blackmail, trafficked victims, used pregnancies for control, forced conversions, and treated the girls inhumanely. These patterns appeared in at least 149 local authority districts, nearly 40% of the UK, showing the problem was widespread and had been happening since the 1950s.

The report also revealed that 13,000 suspected gang rape members were punished with “warning letters.” The government officials were too afraid to crack down on these child rapists that they were only sent WARNING LETTERS!

The report also implicated the current Prime Minister far-left Keir Starmer who was the Director of Public Prosecutions during this time.

13,000 child rapists and groomers were given a pass while young girls were raped and abused! There could not be a more disgusting scandal than this in generations.

What would make a society go silent as its children are being gangraped and abused for foreign gang members!

Will Cain discussed this Wednesday on his afternoon show on FOX News:

Will Cain: Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions. It has been reported that while he was there, 13,000 suspected rape gang members and pedophiles were left off with warning letters. One survivor testified, we raised concerns at the time because we all went to the sexual health clinic. So there are records from that. Even the Chief Inspector of Police was aware. Another said on one occasion, a police officer returned a victim named Fiona to the house where the abuse was occurring and told the men there to have fun with her. The accounts are harrowing. One woman described watching a girl being stabbed, beaten, and set on fire. Another account described a child just 5 or 6 years old tied up and abused, and the report includes allegations of some victims branded with the initial M for Muhammad. It’s sickening, incomprehensible, and preventable.

Via RedWave Press:

MY GOSH: “The R*pe Gang Inquiry Report” EXPOSES British Prime Minister Keir Starmer: “While Sir Keir Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions, it has been reported that 13,000 suspected r*pe gang members and p*dophiles were let off with warning letters.”

Holy H*ll! pic.twitter.com/zz02A2fOKA

— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) June 17, 2026

thegatewaypundit

Warning: The story contains graphic words. Reader discretion is advised.

Forests of trees have been felled in the effort to explain the collapse of trust in the fifth estate; commissions have been created, panels hosted, and teeth gnashed. Trust in the press is in freefall, and this is a disaster — just ask the press.

If I were to give a PowerPoint presentation on the collapse in media credibility, I would begin by showing a screenshot of the latest headline-photo pairing currently making the rounds in the UK. The photo is of a middle-aged, hook-nosed man with graying hair and a five o’clock shadow — the sort of image you’d conjure in your mind if someone asked you to imagine a homeless man.

The headline, this one in the Express: “Transgender woman jailed for performing sex act in front of horrified nurses.”

OK, you think. But perhaps the lede paragraph will rectify this obvious mismatch. Oh, you sweet summer child. Here it is: “A transgender woman and former soldier has been jailed for masturbating in front of nurses at a hospital in Wales. Paula Stanton, 62, of Severn Avenue in Barry, committed the sexual act at University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff on Sunday, May 17.”

That’s not helpful. Perhaps more detail:

Prosecutor Lewis Ball told the court that while the defendant sat in the waiting area awaiting a mental health evaluation, she placed her hand down her trousers “in the groin area.” Mr Ball said: “The defendant put her hands down her leggings to the groin area.

“Staff could see that she had her penis in her hand and that her hand was moving up and down. The court heard how Stanton was masturbating “in full view” of the nurses’ desk, making eye contact with a nurse on duty.

Right. So we are expected to believe that this male army veteran is a woman, and that “she” had “her penis” in “her” hand, and then “she” … well, we know what “she” did next. It isn’t the first time this incorrigible woman has done this sort of thing, either. According to the Express:

Stanton pleaded guilty to carrying out an act of outraging public decency. She has 12 previous convictions for 19 offences, five of which are sex offences committed between 2019 and 2025. In November 2019, Stanton received a five-year sexual harm prevention order for outraging public decency. She was then given another five-year sexual harm prevention order in August 2025 for indecent exposure offences.

I’ll leave the other details of “her” offences out but suffice it to say that “she” seems incapable of keeping “her” penis out of view in public for any considerable length of time. In any case, the Express informed the public that the phallus-waving lady is back behind bars for 100 days, although “she will be released after serving 70 days in custody, with the remainder of her sentence to be served on licence.”

It is difficult to imagine a swifter way of demolishing one’s credibility than writing the phrase “her penis” with a straight face, describing the most masculine crimes physically possible, slapping a photo of a person that anyone with functioning eyeballs could identify as a male across a crowded nightclub dance floor, and then hitting “publish.”

As J.K. Rowling noted drily on X in a viral post that was promptly retweeted over 7,000 times and liked 34,000 times: “135 British MPs are fighting guidance that would deny ‘Paula’ the right to enter women’s and girls’ changing rooms.”

Frankly, the weirdest part of the editorial decision that led to the publication of something that propagandists in totalitarian regimes would dismiss as far too obvious is that the editors cannot possibly have expected people to buy any of this. We are left with two possible conclusions, both of which are equally devastating to media credibility: Either they are obediently publishing ideological garbage knowing it is garbage, or they actually believe this stuff themselves.

How did the media lose its credibility? Some parts of the answer are complicated. But much of it can be summed up in two words: “Her penis.”

lifesitenews

German director Uwe Boll’s latest film about a man who turns to vigilantism after becoming frustrated by rising street crime has been effectively barred from release in Germany. According to Boll, the ban is linked to the film’s portrayal of migrants as perpetrators of serious crimes.

Citizen Vigilante, starring former Hollywood actor Armie Hammer, has been in effect barred from release in Germany after the country’s film classification board refused to grant it any age rating.

The action thriller, due to debut in North America on June 19, stars Hammer as Sanders, a man whose violent campaign against criminals transforms him into a social media sensation.

Germany’s film ratings authority, the FSK, declined to award the film either an adults-only classification or a ‘No Youth Clearance’ designation. Without a rating, the film cannot be distributed through cinemas, television broadcasters, streaming services, or major retailers in Germany.

Boll has condemned the decision as politically motivated. He argues that the film’s level of violence is comparable to mainstream action franchises such as John Wick and The Equalizer, both of which were released in Germany without similar restrictions.

The director claims the FSK is using youth protection rules as a pretext to suppress a film that deals with migration-related crime.

Writing in the conservative publication Tichys Einblick last month, Boll argued that the board objected to the film’s portrayal of migrant offenders and its depiction of a vigilante figure who becomes both a wanted criminal and a public hero.

According to Boll, Citizen Vigilante was inspired in part by real criminal cases in Germany. He has described the film as a fictional work intended to confront security challenges in Europe.

The director further said that the decision to ban the film reflects a tendency within German institutions to marginalise views that challenge mainstream political narratives on migration.

According to Boll,

The mass rapists in the film are young migrants, which is unfortunately particularly common according to crime statistics.

Uwe Boll’s claims are not unfounded: as we recently reported, foreigners are significantly overrepresented among perpetrators of violent crimes in Germany, with murder, rape, and knife crime cases all increasing last year.

This is the result of a lax migration policy that has allowed millions of migrants from Africa and Asia to enter Germany freely, without any strategy in place on how to integrate them.

europeanconservative

A migrant paedophile was allowed into Britain after it was ruled that stopping him would violate his human rights.

Jamaican national Oniel Spence, now 43, applied to enter the UK in 2023 to join his wife and child, but was blocked by the Home Office.

Spence, while in the United States, committed a sexual offence against an underage girl in 2008, when he was 25.

Sentenced to three years’ behind bars, he was deported to Jamaica after serving 18 months.

Home Office officials said his exclusion from Britain would be “conducive to the public good”.

But Spence lodged an appeal at the lower immigration tribunal, winning permission to enter the UK, the Mail revealed.

Spence’s wife – whom he met in 2006 – and 11-year-old daughter are both British nationals who have always lived in the UK.

His lawyers argued his exclusion would infringe upon Article 8 of the controversial European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – the right to a private and family life.

Then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper brought an appeal to upper immigration tribunals, but it was refused – which led Shabana Mahmood to bring a further case to the Court of Appeal.

Senior judges have now overturned the original decision and ordered it to be re-heard by the first-tier tribunal.

In their argument, Spence’s lawyers said he was “primarily sexually attracted to adults”, which judges noted meant there was some “residual or secondary” level of sexual attraction to children.

Spence admitted to the Home Office: “I started partying with a female and she was underage.”

The Jamaican paedophile claimed he “learned” from his sexual offence and said it was an isolated incident in a bar.

In the first appeal, judges determined Spence to be “sexually attracted to children and has pursued relationships with children in the past”.

The court added: “The appellant’s attempts to downplay his sexual involvement with children and his lack of candour about the nature of his offending in my view raise doubts over whether he has truly addressed his sexual attraction to children.”

The judge in the Court of Appeal found his relationship with his wife to be genuine, although they only maintain relationship over the phone.

His relationship, however, was noted by the judge to have started when his wife was 15 years old and he was 23.

“Plainly, this Appellant has been sexually attracted to children and has pursued relationships with children in the past,” Lord Justice Lewis determined.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told the Daily Mail: “This is yet another deeply perverse example of unelected judges trying to override elected ministers to allow a Jamaican child sex offender into the UK – after the US had rightly kicked him out. The tyranny of the judiciary continues.

“We’ve seen foreign murderers, rapists, drug dealers and paedophiles allowed to stay in the UK by judges using interpretations of the ECHR that defy the will of Parliament and defy common sense.

“That’s why, as I explained this week, we must leave the ECHR, abolish the immigration tribunal and end the power of the courts over immigration.

“Deciding who gets to enter or remain in the UK should be in the hands of our elected parliament – not unelected judges.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “We will do everything in our power to continue contesting this case. We strongly believe this individual’s presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good.

“We will not allow foreign criminals to exploit our laws.

“The Home Secretary has been clear that anyone settling in the UK must have a clean criminal record.”

gbnews