by Olivia Murray
The original story is actually a bit old, from the beginning of this year, but I definitely missed it at the time, which means a lot of other people probably did too. And it really wasn’t anything groundbreaking—one more pedophilic predator hurting children—but what the BBC chose to do in its reporting of said news is the real story.
In January 2026, the BBC ran an article on Ashley Boyd, a male hospital worked who had been employed at Swindon’s Great Western Hospital for five years, but was let go after it came to light he had been giving “unnecessary exams” to children. Specifically, testicular examinations, even after he’d been told he was not permitted to do such a thing. According to the report, Boyd “was not a qualified children’s nurse,” but had put in a request “ to work in the paediatric area of the emergency department.” When confronted, Boyd admitted he did in fact touch little boys’ private parts even though he knew these “exams” were unnecessary, though he swears it wasn’t for sexual gratification! The BBC notes that an investigation into Boyd’s conduct concluded he even continued to justify it, determining there was no real sense of “reflection” or “remediation” for his violations.
Oh, and during the time that Boyd was fondling children, he was also a top official for the Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s “LGBTQ+ network.”
Aaaand there it is, surprise, surprise.
Now, here’s the even bigger story, which went viral on X yesterday:
As you can see, the BBC cropped out the “Pride” flag buttons he’s got on his scrubs, in what would have been a dead giveaway—at least to anyone who’s intellectually honest and willing to recognize that most child predators are homosexuals—because they’d rather protect pedophiles than accept reality that the gays are deviants, and something is wrong. To anyone reading the title of the article, “Nurse carried out unnecessary exams on children,” and looking at the accompanying picture, you’d probably assume the offender was a straight man. But he was a gay man—like pedophiles usually are.
Now, it’s almost Halloween, which means my youngest is getting all excited for trick-or-treating—but there’s one house on our street he knows that we absolutely don’t visit. In fact, he’s not allowed anywhere near that house when he’s out riding his scooter, or taking his Great Dane on a walk, because it’s obvious that perverts live there: they’ve got a giant red flag hanging in one of the windows…in the form of a “Pride” flag.
Not to add, at one point, these residents had a yard “decoration” of a little baby doll straddled atop a chicken-looking figure, or a cock. I hate to have my mind in the gutter, but in context of who lives there, I can’t help but think it’s subliminal messaging. What kind of grown adult men put things like this in their yard? Perverted ones, that’s who.
When these people first bought the house, it was actually just before Halloween a few years back, so we did end up trick-or-treating there, because nothing was yet amiss. A young boy answered the door; he looked to be 15 or 16, so I assumed it was a family. Not so—the residents of the home are that young boy, however old he is, and an old man. (I’ve seen them out of the house once, walking and holding hands, and told my son that if he ever sees them, he needs to come inside immediately and tell me.)
Why can’t we all be united in protecting children from predators? Why is this only a crusade on the right? I would really love to know.