The German Office for the Protection of the Constitution apparently operates an anti-vaccination portal via the recently uncovered front organisation “Bundesservice Telekommunikation”. On the informer website run by this organisation, block leaders and those who want to become block leaders can now report anti-vaccination activists. Why this is considered necessary is explained on the website in a typically fact-free Antifa manner: the unvaccinated are to blame for the fact that there is still no “normality”.
The Federal Telecommunications Service is listed as the operator of a website dedicated to the fight against ” opponents of vaccination”.
Booster vaccinations are necessary because, among other reasons, a minority – the non-vaccinated – are not willing to be administered the experimental medicine, the website explains. For this reason, the risk of infection is also higher than it could be due to the genetic engineering jabs, it is claimed, far from the facts. Therefore, people who have been vaccinated should report on the website those who do not want to be vaccinated. This is to make it easier for the authorities to implement the mandatory vaccination, according to the autocratic argumentation.
The addresses reported in this way can be immediately validated online. The reporter can also rate the “dangerousness” of the unvaccinated person. The rating scale ranges from: not a bad person, but just badly informed; to: violent lateral thinker or right-wing radical.
The ominous Bundesservice Telekommunikation (BST) is apparently a front organisation of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV). Research by IT security expert Lilith Wittmann, who “stumbled” across the Bundesservice in a government directory some time ago, points to this. The building’s property management rents about 2,500 m² to the Ministry of the Interior (BMI). Like the Federal Telecommunications Service, the BMI seems to have its own letterbox in the building and an IP address is also said to be assigned to the BMI.
At a press conference at the end of January, the federal government did not want to comment on speculations as to whether it was a front organisation “for very fundamental reasons”. Previously, however, the spokesperson stated “that such an agency does not exist in the portfolio of the federal government”….