French prosecutors probe Al-Fayeds over sex trafficking

Mohamed Al Fayed during Mohamed Al Fayed Opens Harrods in London, Great Britain. Screenshot youtube

He traded on the glamour of owning Harrods, the Paris Ritz and luxury yachts, but Mohamed Al-Fayed was at the centre of a dark web of alleged abuse, say French lawyers for women who liken him to US sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein.

French authorities began investigating the late Egyptian businessman and his brother Salah last year amid allegations of a vast system of sex trafficking and abuse on French soil.

“Every time I met Mohamed Al-Fayed, he tried to assault me,” his former personal assistant Kristina Svensson told French police of her two years working at the Ritz.

Her testimony is all too familiar.

The alleged crimes of Mohamed Al-Fayed, who died in 2023 aged 94, first came to light in a BBC investigation in September 2024. In it, several young women who worked at his upmarket London department store Harrods accused him of rape and sexual assault.

British police told AFP that 154 victims have so far come forward to say the former owner of Premier League club Fulham abused them.

His brother Salah, who died in 2010, is also accused.

But frustrated by London Metropolitan Police’s investigation of the alleged crimes, which span more than 35 years, some victims have turned to France in the hope of finding justice.

“In England they’re ignoring the trafficking… They just want to make it about Al-Fayed and Harrods,” said Rachael Louw, a former Al-Fayed employee, speaking for the first time about her ordeal.

The French investigation, however, is handled by “a unit specialised in human trafficking,” she told AFP.

It is “a relief that our cases are actually being recognised as trafficking”.

Louw was 23 when her bosses sent her to Salah Fayed’s yacht on the French Riviera. Now after 31 years she was able to testify about what happened there to French investigators on February 10.

Louw told AFP she was first “spotted” by Mohamed Al-Fayed in 1993 while working as a sales assistant at Harrods. Shortly after, she was placed on a management training scheme, which required her to submit to a medical exam by a Harley Street doctor before being employed by the chairman’s office in the summer of 1994.

The medical appointment went far beyond a standard checkup, with a pelvic exam and “thorough breast exam”, smear and HIV tests.

And the results were not kept confidential.

The report, seen by AFP, was handed over to Harrods, and described Louw’s personal life: her parents’ separation when she was young, her father living in the United States and the death of her mother and grandmother.

The doctor also noted that she took a birth control pill, had a boyfriend and was in “excellent” health.

The doctor “sent confidential information to arm the rapist”, said French lawyer Eva Joly, who is representing Louw and another former Al-Fayed assistant.

“These young women were like meat, and they wanted to know if they were fit to consume,” said Caroline Joly, another member of the legal team.

Several encounters were arranged between Louw and Salah Fayed at his home in London’s glitzy Park Lane, where Louw said she was drugged with “a crack cocaine mix”.

Louw was then offered a job as an assistant to Salah in France and she was sent there by private jet.

She said she refused further drugs, “and because he didn’t push anymore, I thought it was okay”.

“I had no reason not to trust this man… this was my first job from university.”

Staff confiscated her passport as she flew from London’s Luton airport to his yacht. And once she arrived, “nothing” resembled the job she signed up for.

“I thought I was supposed to be filing paperwork, making arrangements, organising office work,” she said.

Instead “there was no office, no normal working hours, no time off. I was expected to just be with him”, she said.

Louw recalled appearing alongside Salah Fayed at dinners attended by elderly, wealthy men with “young girls and lots of touching”.

When she managed to call her boyfriend, who worked at Harrods, he was fired.

One night, Louw woke up to find Salah in her bed, claiming he was lonely, she said.

“I went ramrod straight and the rest of the night I was awake just lying there petrified,” she said, fearing any movement would be an invitation for him to touch her.

“I didn’t know what he would do to me… I didn’t feel safe.”

She saw other young women in the Fayeds’ orbit.

On a trip to Saint Tropez she encountered a red-headed “young girl”, possibly younger than herself, sunbathing on Mohamed Al-Fayed’s yacht that was moored just off his villa.

“Mohamed starts rubbing lotion all over this girl, she’s wearing a bathing suit and then he started to kiss her,” Louw told AFP.

“I don’t remember anything else” of that day, she said, “so I don’t know if there were drugs, I can’t say for sure whether I was drugged that afternoon,” she added.

What jolted her to escape was the prospect of being trapped alone with Salah after he bought a speedboat with only one bedroom, telling her “that he would take me to sail around the Italian coast”.

“I knew that if I went on that boat nothing good would happen,” she said.

Panicked, she booked the first Air France flight out and worked up the courage to ask for her passport back, which she received although it was clear Salah “was very angry”.

Home again, “I had blocked out” the details of what happened, she said. “I didn’t want to remember.”

For decades she feared she was bound by a confidentiality agreement she had signed at her interview, but seeing other victims speak out against Al-Fayed in 2024, she reconsidered.

“How can I be silent? There has to be a cost to what the perpetrators did. Because if they go unpunished, it emboldens the next man.

“If we women do not speak up we become complicit in our own oppression… powerful men will never change a system that benefits them.”

Despite the deaths of the brothers, the women hope investigators can still track down who enabled the trafficking network.

“There is no such thing as a small piece of information. Every element is useful for the investigation,” Al-Fayed assistant Svensson said, calling on victims and witnesses to speak to police.

The Swedish woman arrived in France in 1993 and was placed by a temp agency at the Ritz in 1998, then owned by Mohamed Al-Fayed, as his assistant.

Svensson, aged 30 at the time, was to help him manage his affairs after the death of his son Dodi with Princess Diana in a Paris car crash, perceived as a prestigious assignment.

During her interview with the Ritz management, the questions posed were “focused” on her appearance and her personal background, she said, even pointing out that she was the “spitting image” of Al-Fayed’s wife.

The Ritz then sent her to Harrods in London for an interview with Al-Fayed himself, and organised accommodation for her at a luxury residence he owned.

“I had brought my CV. He wasn’t interested in that. He only asked me personal questions.”

What followed was a regular pattern of meetings with Al-Fayed. Svensson said she was left in a room alone for hours with no instruction, until he eventually arrived and she would endure sexual assault and attempted rape during which “he’d laugh”.

“I hoped that in time he would see that I wasn’t interested in him and that he would take me seriously,” Svensson told police.

“I was a foreigner, with no family or network in the country, no knowledge of French labour law, and no one to lean on financially if I quit.”

In retrospect, Svensson compares herself to a closely watched “luxury product” which Al-Fayed wanted to possess — “a doll on a shelf”.

Al-Fayed was born Mohamed Fayed in Alexandria, but later changed his surname to the grander Al-Fayed, while his brother kept the original family name.

At the Ritz, she recalls that staff warned her that there were “microphones and cameras in every corner”. And at a villa in Saint Tropez, she said a housekeeper suggested that she block her bedroom door at night.

The Ritz Paris told AFP in a statement that it was “deeply saddened by the testimonies and the allegations of abuse” and that it is “ready to fully cooperate with the judicial authorities. Our teams do not tolerate any form of inappropriate behaviour, which would be a serious breach of our code of conduct.

“We want to express our deepest respect to the women who spoke out,” it added.

Harrods said it “continues to support the bravery of all women in coming forward. Their claims point to the breadth of abuse by Mohamed Fayed and again raise serious allegations against his brother, Salah Fayed. The picture that has emerged suggests that this pattern of abusive behaviour took place wherever they operated.”

They said more than 180 survivors had already received counselling support through its independent advocate. The store also urged survivors to claim compensation through the Harrods Redress Scheme.

London’s Metropolitan police said its “investigation into those who could have facilitated or enabled Mohamed Al-Fayed’s offending continues” and urged victims to come forward.

“The way the Met works has moved on immeasurably, and our teams have transformed the way we investigate rape and sexual offences.”

Lawyers for the two women say their testimony helps sketch the outlines of a “powerful system” of trafficking which resembles the one established during the same period by Epstein.

“As with Epstein, with the Al-Fayeds there is a frenzied consumption of young women and an organised system to procure them,” said lawyer Eva Joly, a former judge and European parliament member.

“The pattern is the same: selecting vulnerable young women, transport, accommodation, isolation and money, which is used to intimidate or corrupt,” she said.

And as with the Epstein case, while the statute of limitations may have expired, an investigation into the Al-Fayeds can still establish the facts and identify any victims whose cases could be still prosecuted.

“We are only at the beginning of piecing the puzzle together in France,” Joly insisted.

brusselssignal

UK: Afghan asylum seeker jailed for 10 years for rape of ‘vulnerable intoxicated’ woman

An asylum seeker from Afghanistan has been jailed for 10 years for the rape of a “vulnerable intoxicated” woman nearly four years ago.

After a trial at Southampton Crown Court, Musafar Hotak, 25, was convicted of the rape and sexual assault by penetration of the woman in the early hours of July 12, 2022.

The court heard that the victim had left the Cafe Parfait bar in Southampton when she was asked to leave by the bouncers for being too drunk.

As she attempted to contact her girlfriend, the defendant, who was 22 at the time, began to follow her before a voicemail sent on the victim’s phone heard her telling him to stop.

The court was told that the next thing the complainant remembered was waking up in Hotak’s home, with him lying on top of her, sexually assaulting her, then raping her.

She repeatedly told him to stop but she felt unable to prevent him because he was using “a lot of force”, the court heard.

After she escaped, she contacted police and an intimate swab taken from her was matched to the defendant’s DNA.

Reading her personal impact statement to the court, the victim said she lived in “constant fear” and the attack had “left scars in every part of my life” which had led her to self-harm and an attempt to take her own life.

She said: “What happened to me destroyed my life in ways I never thought possible. I didn’t just feel violated, I felt erased.

“Since that day I have lived in fear, shame, silence and unbearable pain that I can’t fully describe.

“I was left feeling broken and empty and terrified of the world around me”.

Judge Gary Lucie sentenced Hotak to a 10-year prison term with a four-year extended period on licence, imposed an indefinite restraining order on him not to contact the victim and placed him on the sex offenders’ register.

He told Hotak, who was assisted by a Pashtu interpreter: “The Home Office will consider whether to deport you.

“You took advantage of the victim who was very drunk.

“It is obvious your offending has had a severe psychological impact on her which will probably remain with her for the rest of her life.

“I want to pay tribute to her for her bravery in coming forward and going through what must have been a very difficult time for her”.

gbnews

Britain’s Far-Left Just Stole an Election Through Muslim Voter Fraud and Even Leftist Media is Admitting It!

Green Party candidate Hannah Spencer giving her victory speech.

Britain’s far-left Green Party has defeated Nigel Farage’s Reform Party in a Manchester special election marred by Muslim voter fraud.

The Green Party candidate Hannah Spencer won 49 percent of the vote against the 29 percent won by Reform UK’s Matthew Goodwin.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party was pushed into third place with some 26 percent.

The election took place in the constituency of Gorton and Denton in Manchester, which has a very high Muslim population.

Shortly after polls closed, reports emerged that the Greens may have benefited from so-called “family voting” in heavily Muslim areas.

Many voted Green as a protest over Gaza, reinforcing Britain’s deepening slide into sectarian politics.

“Family voting” refers to multiple relatives entering a single polling booth together.

The practice is illegal under British electoral law, as it can involve one person influencing or directing how another family member casts their ballot.

Writing on the X platform, Reform leader Nigel Farage noted that incidents of family voting had “reached the highest levels of any election in the past 10 years.”

“This is deeply concerning and raises serious questions about the integrity of the democratic process in predominantly Muslim areas,” he wrote.

The fraud was so blatant that even leftist media outlets like The Guardian are admitting that something was awry.

The paper reported:

Democracy Volunteers, an organisation founded by Dr John Ault, and supported by the Conservative peer and psephologist Prof Robert Haywood, deployed four accredited election observers across the constituency. The team attended 22 of the 45 polling stations while polls were open, spending between 30 and 45 minutes in each, working in pairs.

The organisation said its volunteers were looking at people appearing to collude on votes in breach of secret ballot rules, which it called “family voting”, as well as the impact of the requirement for voters to show ID before they were issued with a ballot paper.

Democracy Volunteers said that while the enactment of the Ballot Secrecy Act in 2023 made “family voting” more clearly a breach of the secret ballot, signage to discourage the practice was only seen in 45% of the polling stations observed.

The observing team said they saw family voting in 15 of the 22 polling stations observed, reporting 32 cases in total, nine cases in one polling station alone. They observed a sample of 545 voters casting their votes, of which they said 12% either directed or were affected by family voting.

Just like in America, wherever the far left and mass immigration take root, the stealing of elections is never far behind.

thegatewaypundit

UK law set to make ‘hate crimes’ against homosexuals, gender-confused people ‘aggravated offenses’

GROK

 “Hate crimes” against those who identify as LGBT are set to become aggravated offenses under a proposed U.K. law.

An amendment to the Crimes and Policing Bill, currently progressing through the House of Lords and not yet law, would make crimes “aggravated” if the victim is perceived to be targeted because of their “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or disability, and will carry a higher penalty.

The LGBT activist group Galop celebrated the introduction of the bill, describing it as a “landmark moment.”

According to the BBC, the bill seeks “to introduce measures to tackle crime and antisocial behavior” in England and Wales.

This change would bring so-called “hate crimes” based on homosexual inclination and “gender identity” in line with religion and race, which already carry heightened, defined charges such as “racially-aggravated disorderly behavior.”

The amendment was put forward by Labour MP Rachel Taylor, who said she was “absolutely delighted” by the “vital change in the law,” adding that “this represents a great stride forward in equality for disabled and LGBT+ people.”

She noted that between March 2024 and 2025, over 30,000 “hate crimes” against people in England and Wales were recorded by police on the basis of “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” or disability.

However, according to the U.K.’s Home Office Report of hate crimes between March 2024 and 2025, the vast majority of so-called “hate crimes” against LGBT-identified individuals are non-violent. Only seven percent of “hate crimes” against people based on their sexual inclinations were categorized as “violence against the person with injury,” and 14 percent as “violence against the person without injury.”

Forty-nine percent of “hate crimes” were so-called “public order offences,” which are non-violent crimes that cause fear, alarm, distress, or disorder in a public setting. This could include speech “crimes” like that of a Christian pastor, Dia Moodley, who was recently arrested in Bristol for peacefully street preaching on transgender ideology and Islam.

lifesitenews

Austria: Sadist Pakistani national sentenced to ‘therapeutic center’ after beating random victim to death on the streets of Vienna and filming it

A 22-year-old Pakistani national has been handed the maximum life sentence by the Vienna Regional Court after targeting a random victim, beating him to death, and filming the fatal blows. However, the Pakistani will not serve his sentence in a prison. Instead, because the man was diagnosed as a “sadist,” the judge ordered the man to spend his time in a “forensic therapeutic center,” which features better living conditions than a high-security prison, including sports activities, educational opportunities, and better housing accommodations.

The case dates back to May 2024, when the defendant encountered a 27-year-old man from Bangladesh who, according to the prosecutor, “suffered from schizophrenia and was often outside at night to take walks“ in the Vienna-Favoriten district. Without provocation, the defendant pushed the mentally ill victim against a fence and beat him until he lay motionless on the asphalt.

During the trial, attendees reacted with visible distress as mobile phone footage was played showing the defendant kicking the blood-soaked victim in the face. When confronted with the evidence of his actions, the 22-year-old said without emotion: “I can’t say anything about that.“

The victim, who was described as being in the wrong place at the wrong time, passed away in the hospital two days after the assault.

In addition to the fatal attack, the court viewed videos of the defendant assaulting homeless individuals and other people on the street, which were also found on his phone.

Hofmann suggested these recordings served as trophies and indicated a desire for the exercise of power and murder. Regarding the defendant’s emotional state, the psychiatrist stated, “There is zero empathy for the victims.”

Remarkably, the suspect filmed the murder himself, with even his own legal representation finding the evidence difficult to address.

Lawyer Werner Tomanek noted that “this exceeds some limits, even for us as criminal defense attorneys. To sugarcoat or downplay a defense in the sense of anything is completely inappropriate here.“

Throughout the questioning, the defendant remained uncommunicative, repeatedly stating, “I can’t explain any of this to myself.“

Forensic psychiatrist Peter Hofmann provided a professional analysis of the perpetrator, diagnosing a combined narcissistic-sadistic personality disorder and labeling him a serial offender. This psychological profile, which labeled him a “sadist” and a “narcissist,” is what enabled the man to escape a high-security prison.

Due to the extreme level of danger the defendant poses, Hofmann recommended placement in a forensic therapeutic center.

The presiding judge agreed, handing down a sentence of life imprisonment along with the therapeutic placement.

In the justification for the ruling, the judge remarked, “There can be no other punishment for this act,“ further adding that “we have a debt level here that is so high that the mitigating factors are not sufficient to deviate from life imprisonment. This is an act whose level of aggression leaves one stunned and at a loss for words.“

The judgment is not yet final.

Forensic centers feature a number of advantages over high-security prisons in Austria. Inmates often live in residential groups rather than isolated cells. These units frequently have communal kitchens, living areas with sofas, and dining tables to foster a more “normal” social environment.

Due to a much higher staff-to-patient ratio, these patients often enjoy extra support, including from psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, and psychiatric nurses.

Furthermore, the endless hours spent in cells typically seen in prisons are much reduced. There is a much heavier emphasis on therapy, sports, and educational courses. The goal is to keep the patient constantly engaged in a “structured daily routine” to stabilize their mental state.

rmx.news

FRANCE: Women’s Rights Activist On Trial Over Criminal “Transphobia” After Stating That Women Must Be Wary Of “People With Penises”

Dora Motout [L] and Nicolas “Marie” Cau [R].

A women’s rights activist in France is on trial after being accused of promoting violence against transgender people after stating that women needed to be wary of “people with penises.” Dora Moutot, an author and campaigner, faces possible criminal penalties, with prosecutors arguing that her views contribute to a harmful social climate linked to “trans youth” suicides. They are seeking a fine of about €2,000 and an order that she attend a so-called re-education course.

The legal complaint, first lodged in February 2023, has been backed by three LGBT organizations – AdheosMousse and SOS Homophobie – on behalf of the mayor of Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes, a trans-identified male named Nicolas “Marie” Cau.

Court documents reference a 2022 episode of late-night talk show Quelle époque! which featured a debate between Moutot and Cau. While discussing the issue of men who claim to be transgender women, Moutot stated that women have a need to be cautious in the presence of “people with penises.”

Presenter Léa Salamé asked Moutot, “In what way do you, as a feminist, as a woman, feel that trans demands weaken you? Why do you see this as something that should be opposed? What does it take away from you, as a woman?”

In response, Moutot asserted that it was necessary to “find common ground.” She then cited specific examples of ways in which gender identity ideology policies impede on the rights of women and girls. “For example, in sports: today, a number of trans women—formerly men—compete in women’s categories. And sometimes, simply because they have different musculature, they win,” Moutot elaborated.

“We also face issues in prisons. In certain countries—the United States, in California, or in England—men who have sometimes committed murders of women or rapes are first placed in men’s prisons,” she added. “Then they undergo a ‘gender-affirming’ program, transition while in prison, become women administratively, and are transferred to women’s prisons.”

She continued: “In some cases—I have to say it—there have been men who raped their female fellow inmates. I am not saying that all trans people do this, far from it, but as women we are obliged to be wary of people with penises.”

The latter remark is what attorneys for Cau are arguing constitutes “advocating violence against transgender individuals.”

Nicolas “Marie” Cau. Photo credit: Tendance Ouest

Speaking to Reduxx, Moutot explained how the prosecutors demonized her in court last week.

“Throughout the hearing, they portrayed me as a hateful woman whose sole activity is to make ‘transphobia’ her business model. They implied that I bear responsibility for ‘the suicide of trans people,’” she said.

“The prosecutor, a man, recommended that the judges convict me. In his view, my statement was both misandrist and transphobic. He suggested that I be sentenced to attend a re-education course and pay a fine,” Moutot continued.

“I explicitly stated beforehand: ‘I am not saying that all trans people do this, far from it,’” she explained. “I also said that ‘we need to find common ground’ on areas of friction between trans rights and women’s rights, particularly in sports and prisons. Despite these qualifications, I was prosecuted. The opposing side argues that my statement amounts to a call to transphobic hatred.”

“Of the three judges, two were women and one was a man. The male judge was the most insistent, repeatedly asking me the same questions, as if attempting to corner me,” Moutot told Reduxx. “He questioned several times why I used the term ‘people with penises,’ especially given that I have criticized transgender vocabulary such as ‘people with vulvas.’ I had to justify why I was using what he implied was my opponents’ terminology, suggesting that I was doing so ironically, as if I had sarcastic or malicious intent. The two female judges asked me very few questions.”

“My lawyers had been confident before the hearing that we would win. Afterward, they were more concerned because of the prosecutor’s position. Although his recommendation is not binding on the judges’ final decision, it was troubling. I believe that, to some extent, even my lawyers underestimated the intensity of the climate surrounding this issue. It’s hard to understand before you actually live it.”

Moutot was initially charged with criminal “misgendering” both Cau and Hanneli Escurier, a female journalist who identifies as a man. However, not all of the statements originally cited have remained as part of the ongoing prosecution.

During the debate, Salamé had asked Moutot whether she regarded the mayor as a woman, to which Moutot replied, “To me, Marie Cau is a man.” A statement released by Mousse accused Moutot of “violently attacking” Cau by calling him both a man, and a “transfeminine man.”

The charge relating to the phrase “transfeminine man” was dismissed at an early stage following procedural arguments advanced by Moutot’s defense, Richard Malka and his colleague Marine Viegas, who raised an objection based on the formal defects of the summons and the legal classification being relied upon.

Cau, whose given name is Nicolas, became well known in France after he was elected to political office in 2020 and was celebrated in media reports as the first transgender mayor in the nation. After he won the election in the small town of Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes, which has a population of approximately 500, Cau expressed an ambition to run for President.

Last year, Cau published an autobiography titled Madame Mayor (Madame le Maire) wherein he described his urge to wear women’s clothing, an activity which he says brings about the “height of happiness” for him.

“Once I was alone in the house, I put on my girl’s clothes. A feeling of happiness, of liberation. Dressed like this, I can talk about myself in feminine terms and I can breathe,” Cau wrote. “Finally. I am myself. Shortly after puberty, I would also wear make-up… It became a bit like a drug, an addiction, because it feels so good that I would try to find that pleasure again.”

In his autobiography, Cau also detailed his divorce from his wife, and railed against the justice system, which granted custody of their children to his former wife.

“The woman is always the victim, while the man is always the executioner, often accused of violence or alcoholism,” he wrote. The judge presiding over their divorce proceedings ordered him to leave the home and granted him limited visitation rights – a situation that Cau says “is one that the courts traditionally reserve for a failing or even violent father.”

Moutot has been the target of what she describes as “enormous harassment” for years, beginning in 2019 when she began to question gender identity ideology.

Previously, prominent political figures in France have publicly condemned and even mocked Moutot on social media for her statements about biological sex. Following an interview published in Le Figaro last August, Senator Mélanie Vogel of The Greens (EELV) taunted Moutot on Twitter, commenting that “transphobes are not feminists.” The publication had shared a photo of Moutot alongside a quote: “A woman is an adult human female, this is a biological reality. Only women are able to give life. This is a privilege.”

For stating her views that men cannot become women, Moutot has been targeted by activists who have explicitly called for violent acts to be committed against her, even for her murder. Examples of calls for violence against her include trans activists chanting, “One TERF, one bullet” and “Dora Moutot to the bottom of the Rhine.”

In May 2024, trans activists chanted death threats at Moutot and her colleague, Marguerite Stern, outside of Assas University where they had been invited to speak about a book they wrote together critical of gender identity ideology titled “Transmania.”

Demonstrators surrounded the entrance and shouted, “A TERF, a bullet, social justice,” at the two women as they were escorted by police. “They have no shame,” said Stern in footage depicting the scene. “How can they say that in front of police?” marveled Moutot.

Other threats published online urged people to “settle things with knives,” while still others encouraged supporters to “burn” and “smash” her. Moutot filed a legal complaint against those who made violent threats against her, but her complaints were dismissed by the courts.

reduxx

European law professors call for EU probe into Mandelson’s tenure as Commissioner

Lord Peter Mandelson, half-naked in the DOJ-released Files, is experiencing the ‘Epstein curse’ in a big way

A coalition of eminent legal scholars has called on European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to launch an immediate investigation into former European Commissioner for Trade, Peter Mandelson.

The request comes following Mandelson’s arrest in the UK over alleged misconduct in public office linked to the late US convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

In a letter sent today, 76 academics affiliated with The Good Lobby Profs, a non-partisan network advocating for transparency in European Union governance, urge the EC to assess whether Mandelson breached his legal and ethical obligations as a Commissioner, particularly regarding integrity, independence, and discretion.

The signatories, led by Prof Alberto Alemanno (HEC, Paris) and Prof Laurent Pech (Middlesex University London), argue that Mandelson’s overlapping relationship with Epstein during his 2004–2008 tenure, a period covering highly sensitive trade negotiations, raises serious questions about potential misuse of confidential EU information.

Mandelson was arrested on February 23 by British police on suspicion of leaking confidential government information to Epstein.

While UK media have focused on Mandelson’s later role as a cabinet minister under then-prime minister Gordon Brown (2008–2010), the professors want scrutiny of his four-year term as EU Trade Commissioner. In that role, he oversaw negotiations including the Doha Development Round, EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) talks, and EU-ASEAN trade disputes.

Documents released by the US Department of Justice suggest Mandelson’s ties to Epstein spanned 2002–2011, encompassing his entire EC term.

There are suspicions he may have tipped off Epstein about an EU bailout in 2010.

“The Commission cannot look away when credible concerns arise about the possible misuse of confidential information by a former Commissioner,” said Alemanno.

“If ethical obligations under EU law are to mean anything, they must be enforceable—even after a mandate ends.”

Epstein, a financial intermediary for hedge funds and private interests, would have found advance knowledge of EU trade positions invaluable, experts say.

The professors argue that the EC’s silence, while UK authorities investigate only the domestic national dimension, risks undermining the enforceability of post-mandate obligations for senior EU officials.

Together with over 60 law professors we asked @vonderleyen to open an investigation on Peter Mandelson’s exchanges with Jeffrey Epstein at the time the former was EU Trade Commissioner.

As reported by @POLITICOEurope #playbook Full text of the letter: https://t.co/fuXFtssoPO pic.twitter.com/votBMmneme— Alberto Alemanno 🇪🇺 (@alemannoEU) February 26, 2026

The letter underscores that European Commissioners are bound by strict legal and ethical obligations both during and after their tenure and refer to three relevant articles.

Under Article 245 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Commissioners are required to behave with integrity and discretion, particularly concerning the acceptance of appointments or benefits after leaving office.

This provision is designed to prevent the misuse of privileged information or influence gained during their mandate.

Furthermore, Article 17(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) mandates that Commissioners must remain completely independent in the performance of their duties.

They are explicitly prohibited from seeking or taking instructions from any government, institution or external entity. This principle is fundamental to ensuring that EU decision-making remains impartial and free from undue influence.

The Code of Conduct for Members of the EC reinforces these obligations, explicitly prohibiting the use of confidential information obtained during a Commissioner’s term for any purpose other than the exercise of their official duties.

The professors emphasise there is no evident limitation period that would prevent the EC from investigating potential breaches of these rules.

Given the seriousness of the allegations, they argue that the EC not only has the competence but also the duty to investigate under the Treaties, the Code of Conduct and its broader institutional mandate to uphold the rule of law.

Therefore, the professors ask von der Leyen to open formally an institutional inquiry into whether Mandelson used, disclosed, or misappropriated any confidential information obtained in his capacity as European Commissioner for Trade for the benefit of Epstein, his associates, or any third party with a financial or commercial interest in EU trade policy.

This includes a comprehensive review of the released Epstein files, plus a review of EC files related to Mandelson’s activities as Trade Commissioner.

On top of this, the professors want the matter to be sent to the EC’s  Independent Ethical Committee as well as the EU’s Inter-institutional Body for Ethical Standards.

All this needs to be co-ordinated with the UK law enforcement authorities, giving them full access to all relevant EC records, communications and documentation.

The professors urge the EC to issue a public statement and act with clarity towards the wider public.

They argue that failing to act would not only weaken the enforceability of ethical standards for former Commissioners but also send a dangerous signal that the EU is unwilling or unable to hold its highest-ranking officials accountable for potential misconduct.

“Inaction would risk compounding what is already a reputational crisis for European institutions, at a moment when the Commission’s credibility and democratic legitimacy are under sustained pressure,” the wrote.

In reply to Brussels Signal, a spokesperson of the European Commission said they were looking into possible breaches into the treaty obligations, ethical obligations and code of conduct, and would take action on that basis, if necessary.

The press office of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) told Brussels Signal that OLAF “can confirm it is examining the matter. We cannot comment further at this stage.

“OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned.”

brusselssignal

Mass Migration Crisis: Nearly 40% of Berlin Police Applicants Fail Basic German Test

GROK

Internal numbers from the Berlin Police have revealed that the force’s recruitment problems have gone beyond just not having enough applicants—now it’s about applicants who can’t meet even the most basic language standards, amid broader issues with mass immigration and slipping educational levels across Germany.

According to data from 2024 and 2025, nearly four out of ten applicants to the Berlin Police failed the mandatory German language examination. Of 10,874 candidates, 4,271 did not meet the required standard—a staggering 39.3% failure rate, Apollo News reports.

The figures are particularly alarming given the obviously critical role language plays in enforcing the long. Police officers must write precise reports, draft legal documents, and communicate clearly with citizens in high-pressure situations.

Even higher academic credentials offered little assurance of success. Among applicants holding a high school diploma, university entrance qualification, or completed degree, a shocking 30.1% still failed the German test.

In total, more than 1,800 academically credentialed candidates were unable to pass what is considered a basic language assessment. The alarming trend has directly impacted staffing plans across the Berlin Police Department.

Last year alone, some 25% of the 1,224 planned training positions went unfilled. In a city already grappling with rising crime and public safety concerns—both associated with the sustained mass migration into the country and city over the past decades—such shortfalls raise serious questions about long-term readiness.

It’s worth noting that the selection process itself isn’t particularly complex. Applicants complete a 200-word computer-based dictation exercise in which a text is read aloud in segments of five to eight words, with pauses in between.

Under internal guidelines, anyone who makes more than 14 errors fails. Practice materials are widely available online, yet the failure rate remains stubbornly high, revealing just how many individuals with migrant backgrounds are trying to become police officers in the German capital.

Even among those who pass the exam, additional linguistic support is often required. During the first three semesters of training, many recruits receive supplemental German instruction, with small group assistance provided regularly.

It’s been made clear by the Berlin authorities that standards will not be lowered. State Secretary of the Interior Christian Hochgrebe,a member of the left-liberal Socialist party, emphasized that applicants are expected to prepare independently for a profession that demands discipline and personal motivation.

The department, thus far, has refused to introduce preparatory courses before the application stage, with officials arguing that the ability to meet baseline language requirements should be a prerequisite for public service.

Critics of Germany’s suicidal mass immigration policies, of which there is no shortage, view the data as highly symptomatic of a broader national problem. They insist, rightly, that years and years of uncontrolled mass migration and the prioritization of multicultural accommodation over integration have weakened foundational competencies.

Germany’s police forces are tasked with enforcing the law of the land, and that responsibility requires absolute command of the national language and loyalty to national standards.

The right-wing, anti-globalist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has warned for years that the dilution of educational expectations and exceedingly lax integration policies would inevitably have tangible consequences. The Berlin figures now being cited are clear evidence that those warnings were not at all unfounded.

Berlin, viewed by many as a showcase of left-liberal globalist governance, has for years struggled with crime, overcrowded public services, and strained public institutions. The inability to recruit sufficient qualified police officers only compounds those challenges.

AfD supporters have long argued that public safety begins with rigorous standards, contending that lowering expectations or masking deficiencies would undermine trust in law enforcement.

In their view, exhibiting mastery of the German language is not optional but foundational to national cohesion. The debate comes at a time when questions of identity, sovereignty, and state authority dominate political discourse across Germany and, for that matter, much of Europe. Many voters increasingly prioritize security and the continuity of Germany’s traditional cultural identity over liberal-globalist experimentation, which so far has proven itself to be utterly disastrous.

The Berlin Police figures, for a growing segment of the German population, symbolize the urgent need to reassert standards, drastically limit immigration, and restore confidence in core institutions.

As Germany continues to navigate civilization-altering demographic shifts and political realignment, the issue of who enforces the law—and whether they can meet its basic linguistic demands—will, without a doubt, remain central to the national conversation

thegatewaypundit

‘They stab each other in the middle of the street with children walking by’ — Residents of Dutch town with large asylum center warn others about following suit

Illustration AI generator

Residents living near the large-scale asylum seekers’ center (AZC) in Harderwijk, the Netherlands, have described what they say is a sharp deterioration in safety and quality of life.

Tom de Nooijer, party leader and municipal council member of the Christian Association Oldebroek (CVO), canvassed opinion ahead of a potential asylum accommodation debate in the neighboring town of Oldebroek.

In a video published on social media, De Nooijer said he had crossed the municipal border to ask residents directly about their experiences. “What is it like to have a large-scale AZC in your municipality?” he asked, explaining that Oldebroek does not currently host such a facility but is discussing asylum accommodation.

Several residents revealed a considerable decline in public safety. One elderly lady said, “I won’t walk my dog here at night after nine o’clock. So that says it all.” A mother added, “Fights, shots were fired here on the premises.”

Others alleged frequent disturbances, with one resident stating, “Lots of crime, aggressiveness, police, ambulances. Every week there is something.”

Some described several incidents involving knives. “One stabbing to another stabbing. And then again that fuss, fights with people in the street,” one local said. Another added, “They stab each other. Just in the middle of the street with the children walking by.” A resident living opposite the center, who uses a mobility scooter, said, “If you see how often the police stand there. Surely that says it all.”

Claims of theft were also raised. “There is a lot of theft, so you can’t leave your bike open for a while,” one man said, adding that a local supermarket “had to take extra security because people also steal everything.” A teen boy told De Nooijer, “Just last month, someone broke into a neighbor’s car.”

One man said he had suffered a “broken nose” by one of the residents and described the ongoing situation as “one big mess.”

When asked what advice they would give to Oldebroek if it proceeds with asylum reception plans, the responses were overwhelmingly negative. “I advise against it to every municipality,” one resident said. Another added, “Oh no, please let them never get into it.” A third stated, “I would not advise that, as it only brings a bit of insecurity indeed.”

Harderwijk authorities have not responded publicly within the context of this video to the allegations made by residents. The AZC system in the Netherlands is managed nationally, with municipalities often tasked with hosting facilities under central government agreements.

Harderwijk is not the only Dutch municipality where asylum reception centers have come under scrutiny. In November 2025, serious unrest was again reported at a controversial center for unaccompanied minors on the Soestdijk Palace estate in Baarn, near Utrecht. Local reporting revealed that with around 90 asylum seekers housed there last year, the facility recorded 309 incidents in 2024, including roughly 100 cases involving physical or verbal violence.

An earlier investigation found vulnerable minors had allegedly been beaten, threatened, and forced to shoplift for older boys, with some assaults said to have taken place in nearby woods.

Tensions have also flared elsewhere. In October 2025, residents of Uithoorn protested plans to build a 250-person asylum center in their town alongside a 280-person facility just across the border in Amstelveen, less than two kilometers away. Demonstrations escalated into clashes with police, leading to arrests, as local politicians warned of growing division within the community.

High-profile criminal cases have further intensified debate. In February 2026, a Nigerian asylum seeker accused of murdering 17-year-old Lisa in Amsterdam confessed in court to the killing and to multiple sexual assaults. Lisa was murdered as she cycled home on Aug. 20 last year.

In another case, prosecutors alleged that three Syrian asylum seekers raped an 18-year-old student in Maastricht, with one suspect also accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl.

Dutch authorities maintain that asylum reception remains a national responsibility, with municipalities required to accommodate asylum seekers under government allocation rules.

The full report by the Christian Association Oldebroek can be viewed here.

rmx.news

British comedian John Cleese will avoid BC after $750k transgender ‘discrimination’ ruling

Legendary British comedian John Cleese says he cannot risk visiting British Columbia after former public school trustee Barry Neufeld was ordered to pay out $750,000 to a teacher’s union by the BC Human Rights Tribunal for arguing that there are only two genders.

The tribunal ruled that 24 of Neufeld’s publications were “discrimination” and “hate speech,” and made it clear that his rejection of gender ideology was key to their decision.

“If a person elects not to ‘believe’ that gender identity is separate from sex assigned at birth, then they do not ‘believe’ in transpeople. This is a form of existential denial,” the tribunal stated. “A person does not need to believe in Christianity to accept that another person is Christian. However, to accept that a person is transgender, one must accept that their gender identity is different than their sex assigned at birth.”

Cleese, who is 86, is best known for Monty Python and creating the British sitcom Fawlty Towers. He will now avoid a province that he has previously praised to avoid the crackdown on gender ideology.

“What a pity!” he wrote on X on February 21 in a repost of the news of the ruling against Neufeld. “I’m arranging a theatrical tour of Canada this fall, and now I won’t be able to risk doing any shows in British Columbia. I was really looking forward to coming.”

Cleese has long been a staunch defender of freedom of speech, and this has put him at odds with trans activists.

“You can disagree with someone without hating them,” he stated earlier this month. “That’s the basis of liberal democracy. Using the suffix ‘-phobic’ suggests fear and disgust. I have been labelled trans-phobic by illiterates. I asked them if the fact they disagreed with me means they are Cleese-phobic. I didn’t get a reply.”

In 2020, Cleese signed a letter in support of JK Rowling, a prominent critic of gender ideology. When he faced accusations of “transphobia,” he replied: “I’m afraid I’m not that interested in trans folks.” In response to another angry criticism, Cleese got snarky: “Deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”

There is precedent for the prosecution of comedians in British Columbia. In 2011, the BC Human Rights Tribunal ordered comedian Guy Earle to pay $15,000 to a member of his audience for the alleged “lasting physical and psychological effect” of his “homophobic” jokes during his set. Earle’s petition for review was dismissed by the BC Supreme Court.

lifesitenews