Month: November 2025

History can only be understood by looking in the rearview mirror. And tragically, the same is true when we are trying to understand in retrospect whether a leader of a country was making a strategic move against all odds, or if he was just riding his own narratives. It seems now that Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, did the former when, years ago, he warned that George Soros’ actions raise plenty of red flags.

Though it was Russia, in 2015, that first listed two branches of Soros’s network (Open Society Foundations and Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation) as ‘undesirable’ organizations, effectively banning their activities and grants inside Russia, Hungary and others followed suit shortly. In 2018, following the first wave of illegal immigration into Europe, Hungary passed the so-called Soros Law. A law that was misinterpreted by some large Jewish organizations and was, without doubt, purposefully mischaracterized by the European Union—the very Union whose mission is to protect its member states’ interests. But, as so often, the EU chose another path.

Instead of looking carefully at Orbán’s concerns, or at least scrutinizing the money flows of immigrant-supporting NGOs, the EU doubled down on what today can be called anti-Hungarianism. The matrix here is larger than Hungary, and we can only wonder: seven years down the road, would the EU still argue that the Soros Law—designed to curb immigration and restrict the activities of civil society organizations supporting mass illegal migration—violated EU law? Or, seeing the daily news on the countless sexual assaults on women and girls across Europe, would the EU now argue that not having an EU-wide ‘Soros Law’ violates human rights and women’s rights? This latter scenario, unfortunately, should be relegated to the realm of fantasy. 

The question remains: was Orbán wrong about Soros and merely spreading right-wing propaganda, or was he absolutely correct?

As the adage says, to get to the truth, follow the money. And if we do, the conclusion is clear: Orbán was right. Soros funds countless organizations undermining national sovereignty, all aiming for one thing: destabilizing the system. The destabilizing attempts come from multiple directions. For example, UN-accredited NGOs whose goal is to delegitimize Israel and legitimize Hamas at the United Nations share common sources of funding: the Open Society Foundations, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Ford Foundation.

It is no different when it comes to the money flow behind the recent ‘No Kings’ marches that, as per estimates, garnered 5 million protesters. All that organically, they claim. But who really finances the absurdly named No Kings marches that ‘aimed’ to de-crown the un-crowned—in fact, democratically elected—POTUS?

It is generally known, even from the mainstream media, that the No Kings actions were organized by a broad progressive coalition, consisting of such actors as Indivisible, trade unions, and various civil rights and civic organizations. But the funding came from three main sources:

1. Large progressive foundations like George Soros’s Open Society network providing multi-million-dollar support to Indivisible and similar organizations.

2. Trade unions and advocacy groups such as AFT, SEIU, and CWA contributing through member mobilization and logistical support.

3. Small donations and volunteer work; that is, local-level fundraising and participation.

The largest element in the No Kings Marches is the Indivisible Project.  According to their 2023 annual report, they “closed the year in a stable financial position, thanks to consistent grassroots support, the strong backing of institutional donors, and careful management of resources.” They offer a GROW Grant program for local groups and provide opportunities for online community fundraising (“Distributed Fundraising”), where local organizations collect funds, apply, and get reimbursed. According to OpenSecrets, the sources of their Political Action Committee (PAC) expenditures in the 2024 cycle were: “PACs: 99.93%, individuals: 0.07%.” What is already shady is the phrase “strong support of institutional donors”—it is vague. Which foundations? What amounts?

According to Open Society Foundations’ grant records, the organization has awarded Indivisible approximately $7.6 million in grants between 2017 and 2023, designated to support the organization’s social welfare activities and civic engagement. These financial contributions from OSF have enabled Indivisible to expand its reach and impact, facilitating its efforts in organizing and mobilizing communities across the United States. And that includes the No Kings Marches.  

Then we have the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). According to their website: “Our work is financed by membership fees, contributions from private individuals, and support from private foundations.” One of their briefings states, “Beyond membership fees, ACLU’s operations are supported annually by over $50 million in donations from individuals and foundations. We do not receive government funding.” However, other sources indicate major contributions from foundations such as the Ford Foundation, Open Society Foundations, Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the infamous Rockefeller Foundation. It is also a fact that in 2014, the Open Society Foundation granted the ACLU a $50 million grant to support its nationwide campaigns. 

It is worth taking a look at MoveOn (MoveOn.org) too. According to their own statement: “MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by small donations—the average donation is about $20. We do not accept money from the government or corporations.” Their 2023 report claims that “MoveOn.org Civic Action receives hundreds of thousands of donations annually; the average donation is $19.” That sounds good, but according to InfluenceWatch—and even their own website—MoveOn supports left-wing/progressive causes and candidates, and major donors (e.g., George Soros) are also directly connected to it.  In fact, in 2024, the Open Society Action Fund gave $1,000,000 to the organization.

And lastly, there is Social Security Works. According to their website, “Social Security Works is funded by individual donations and various foundation support, including the Open Society Foundations, Retirement Research Foundation, CREDO, and the Civic Participation Action Fund. The organization was originally founded with generous support from Atlantic Philanthropies.”

This is why neither Orbán nor Trump—the latter requesting that federal prosecutors investigate George Soros—can be accused of using Soros as a convenient scapegoat: The money trail demonstrates that Soros’s support actively opposes sovereignty.

Yet, here is where the next layer of perversion comes in: the same European cities that condemned Orbán’s legislation became hosts to rallies supporting the No Kings movement. From London to Madrid, thousands gathered waving signs declaring “No Kings, No Fascists” under banners coordinated by local chapters of Indivisible’s international solidarity network.

What was an organic protest in appearance was, in reality, a carefully orchestrated political intervention. The same agencies Orbán warned about—foreign-funded NGOs, foundation-backed movements—were replicated in Europe under the guise of grassroots activism. There is no grassroots movement that can harmonize the large-scale event logistics, from printed placards to synchronized social media amplification that we saw during the No Kings Marches. Indivisible’s own playbook, distributed to European partners, included scripts for chants, media talking points, and even suggested hashtags (#NoKingsInternational)—all traceable to training sessions bankrolled by OSF’s Open Society Policy Center.

The pattern is clear: powerful actors fund NGOs to manipulate political systems and destabilize sovereignty. The perversion is not just the rallies themselves but the illusion of organic dissent—an engineered narrative presented as spontaneous, yet meticulously coordinated behind the scenes. What the public saw as righteous outrage was, in truth, a transnational influence operation dressed in the clothing of democracy.

All these developments demonstrate that Orbán’s early warnings were not paranoia. The destabilizing forces he resisted then are visible in Europe today, and the evidence, when you follow the money, is undeniable.

europeanconservative

A trans-identified male in Denmark who has been given permission to compete against women in football is being celebrated by national media. Oliver John Collenette, who calls himself Olivia Kjærgaard Collenette, began claiming a transgender status approximately three years ago, and shortly after began demanding the right to play on a women’s football team. Now, he has been granted approval by DBU Zealand (DBU Sjælland) to play on one of the club’s women’s teams.

In a glowing interview published this week by the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR), Collenette expressed his disappointment that the policy allowing men like himself to compete in women’s sports was not yet a national measure. To date, only DBU Zealand, the local governing body for football on the island of Zealand, has put into place guidelines allowing men to “identify” into women’s teams.

“I’m actually happy that I can play with the gender I identify as. But it’s not so nice that you don’t know how it will be in the other unions. It would be nice if it were nationwide – if the whole country supported transgender people,” Collenette told DR.

Until recently, Collenette had played football on men’s teams. “It was terrible for me when I played with the boys. I didn’t feel like I fit in, and I felt left out of the community,” he told the national broadcaster. “The fact that I was wearing girls’ clothes and felt like I was being looked at a lot and not really talked to… I was ostracized and I felt like I wasn’t welcome in a way, so it made me very insecure.”

Sieh dir diesen Beitrag auf Instagram an

Ein Beitrag geteilt von Jyllands-Posten (@jyllandsposten)

Collenette indicated, in the interview, that women expressed opposition to his inclusion in women’s sports. “In the beginning, when we went to games, we always asked the teams before we showed up if they were okay with playing with us. When they heard there was a transgender person, they said no.”

“I don’t see why it would be a problem for biological women to play alongside transgender women who act and identify as women. It’s not about taking anything away from anyone, it’s about creating more diversity,” Collenette added.

However, team manager for the women’s team in Frederiksberg Fritids Fodboldentusiaster, Mille Sørensen, voiced her concerns over the decision by DBU Zealand. “Perhaps you haven’t thought through the fact that there might be teams where there are suddenly more biological men on the field. And you haven’t considered how it affects girls and women to be asked to ignore the fact that they are playing against a biological man – even though they can clearly see it. I think that is very problematic,” she said.

Last November, Collenette was also positively profiled by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which produced a podcast episode advocating for his inclusion on a women’s team. The Danish Football Association (DBU) had been under fire for the implementation of a new policy allowing local football clubs to create their own guidelines regarding the involvement of males claiming to be transgender women.

Reduxx has identified a Pinterest profile belonging to Collenette in which he had shared fetish content, calling into question his narrative and motive for joining a women’s sports team.

In one Pinterest album titled “Petticoated Boys,” Collenette shared the cover of a short book titled “Feminizing Men: A Guide for Increased Joy in Crossdressing.”

According to a description on Amazon, the book is intended as a guide for “male-to-female crossdressers.”

“Maximize the joys of being a male-to-female crossdresser and increase the gratification, satisfaction, degree of sensuality, and amount of time you have to enjoy it in this quick but thought-provoking short read. This is a guide that will help feminized men—husbands, boyfriends, sissies, those in female-led relationships, or cuckolded males who are feminized.”

“Feminizing Men” has hundreds of reviews and ratings on Amazon. One reviewer commented: “The sexually explicit desires described in the section about libido pushes the envelope
to another level when it talks about the feminized male crossdresser using sex toys and being with men and how it feels to be with men. This book pulls no punches it tells how feminized men feel and the desires they have to feel like a women and sex is what makes it feel real.”

Other titles by the same erotic fiction author include pornographic stories such as “Feminized Bimbo Husband,” “The Hypnotist – A Cuckold Husband is Hypnotized and Turned into a Shemale,” and “Forced Feminization: A Hot Wife, Cuckold, Forced Fem, Male Chastity, Feminized Men, Shemale Slut Story.”

Collenette shared the content around the same time he would have begun identifying as transgender.

As previously revealed by Reduxx, the Danish Football Association (DBU), when discussing the decision, had consulted with a trans-identified male who published homemade fetish pornography of himself while dressed in women’s lingerie.

Shortly afterwards, Jacobsen filed a lawsuit against psychotherapist and blogger Lotte Ingerslev, alleging she had “misgendered” him in a posts she wrote warning her followers about the hardcore fetish pornography he had made. Nadia Jacobsen was interacting online with several accounts producing or sharing “sissy” or “forced feminization” genres of pornography, which include themes of men being turned into women via sexual penetration and humiliation, clothing, and makeup.

In Jacobsen’s case, he had posted a photo of his genitals locked in a cage, or “chastity device,” while encouraging his followers to share the image. “I have gotten to a point where I don’t really want to masturbate like a boy anymore, so I will only be cumming like a woman,” Jacobsen wrote.

On November 24, 2023, the DBU published a statement announcing that “all genders are welcome in Danish football,” and promising to implement a new position within the organization for a “diversity officer.”

“DBU will make a structural investment for increased diversity. As one of the first things, DBU will hire a diversity officer whose expertise in, among other things, this area will help with inclusion,” the statement reads.

“Towards 2025, the goal is to create the framework for it to become possible in grassroots football for transgender people to play with the gender they identify as… The method is based on self-identification, which has already been introduced in German grassroots football, and the method aims to ensure that everyone feels included and welcome.”

Additionally, the DBU published a guidance on “inclusion” with Jacobsen’s input, which encourages Danish football clubs to permit men to enter women’s locker rooms and changing facilities.

“The dressing situation can be challenging for people with a different gender identity, and it is important that care is taken about the possible challenges, so that the dressing situation does not strain inclusion,” reads the document.

reduxx

Did the German capital narrowly escape a terrorist attack? Special forces arrested a Syrian man on Saturday.
The suspect, Abdalla R., is alleged to have planned a bloodbath. According to information obtained by BILD, materials for constructing explosive devices were seized from his home.
After his arrest in Berlin’s Neukölln district, he was taken to a detention centre. He is scheduled to appear before a magistrate on Sunday afternoon. According to information obtained by the newspaper BILD from security sources, the Syrian had three residential addresses in Berlin. One on Buschkrugallee, one on Sonnenallee and one on Lindenstraße.
As the man was considered to be extremely dangerous, officers from the Special Operations Command (SEK) were involved in the operation alongside state security officers. Abdalla R. is charged with preparing a serious crime that poses a threat to the state. Details of a possible target were not initially disclosed, but the suspected terrorist’s planned location is believed to have been Berlin.
According to information obtained by BILD from security circles, investigators are said to have seized materials suitable for the construction of explosive devices.
No comment was made as to whether the tip-off about the suspect came from a foreign intelligence service.

BILD.de

We’ve just heard from British Transport Police with an update outside Huntingdon station about last night’s stabbing attack.

Here’s a recap of everything we now know:

• Two men have been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder following an incident on board a London-bound train. They are a 32-year-old black British man and a 35-year-old British man of Caribbean descent
• Eleven people in total were treated in hospital following the incident. Two remain in a life-threatening condition while four have since been discharged
• Police say there is nothing to suggest it is a terrorist incident and have asked the public to come forward with any more information
• Armed officers boarded the train and arrested the two suspects within eight minutes of the first 999 calls from passengers, who raised the alarm at about 19:42

BBC

An Egyptian man has been allowed to stay in Britain on human rights grounds despite committing 19 crimes since arriving in the UK.

The court also granted him the right to stay anonymous and protect his identity.

The 24-year-old arrived in Britain in 2016 and has committed offences including robbery, burglary, possessing an offensive weapon and drug offences.

He also served time in prison after assaulting an emergency worker.

The Egyptian argued that he was at risk in Egypt as his father was a banned Muslim Brotherhood extremist.

The court ruled that his deportation would violate the European Convention on Human Rights [ECHR].

Despite his crimes, the man has not been named to preserve the privacy of his mental health issues.

The ECHR has faced severe criticism from Eurosceptic politicians, who claim it hinders Britain on issues of sovereignty, national security, and immigration control.

Speaking on the case, Tory Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told The Sun: “This dangerous repeat criminal should be kicked out.

“He is attacking and robbing British citizens and has no place in this country.

“Why do judges say his rights are more important than protecting the British public?

“We must end the ECHR which enables this madness and immediately deport all foreign criminals.”

At the Conservative Party Conference last month, the Tories officially adopted the policy of committing to leave the European Convention on Human Rights.

This decision was based on a review by the Shadow Attorney General, Lord Wolfson, who concluded that remaining in the Convention placed “significant constraints” on a future Conservative Government’s ability to implement key policies.

Reform UK has long stated that leaving the ECHR is a core and explicit policy commitment, which they have made a priority from day one if they were in power.

The ECHR is frequently blamed for preventing the Government from deporting illegal migrants and foreign criminals.

Critics point to specific judgments, such as those concerning Article 8, the right to private and family life, which they argue are used to block removals, thereby hindering effective border control and immigration policy.

Supporters for the convention argue that legislation provides a safety net for individuals, guaranteeing fundamental freedoms like the right to a fair trial and protection from torture.

They support its role in reinforcing the UK’s commitment to the rule of law and claim it strengthens Britain’s international standing.

gbnews

10 people were stabbed on a train in the UK. 9 of them are in the hospital with life-threatening injuries. Two unnamed persons are reportedly under arrest.

People fled the attackers, trampling each other and hiding in the toilets, while the terrorists roamed doing their bloody work.

And the authorities have emphasized the importance of not discussing who might have done it.

Shabana Mahmood, an Islamist politician who wanted to outlaw any discussion of Islamic violence as ‘Islamophobia’, was appointed to head security by the Starmer regime, has warned “I urge people to avoid comment and speculation at this early stage.”

There’s no need to urge the public to “avoid comment and speculation” when the violence comes from the right-wing or a mentally ill man.

Once the authorities urge us to “avoid comment and speculation”, we know what they don’t want us talking about.

Mahmood’s warning isn’t just an empty threat. Those living in the UK who ‘commented’ or ‘speculated’ in the past had the police show up at their door and have been arrested.

After a Muslim terrorist murdered 3 British girls, a 55-year-old woman was dragged out of her home, arrested and held for 36 hours for “posting inaccurate information” that he was Muslim.

Allison Pearson, a journalist, had the police show up at her door after she tweeted a criticism of  them for posing with members of an Islamist  movement. Such incidents have become routine.

One of the most infamous cases is Lucy Connolly, the mother of two children, who had lost her little boy after his hospitalization, and expressed her anger after the brutal Muslim terrorist murders of three little girls at a dance studio. Lucy was sentenced to 2.5 years in prison even while Islamists have been allowed to spout their support for terrorism and genocide.

The UK public has a choice between being stabbed by Muslim terrorists or being arrested by their own government.

frontpagemag

BBC Verify has authenticated a video of the aftermath of the stabbing incident near Huntingdon.

🚨 WATCH: Armed police board the LNER train at Huntingdon after multiple people were stabbed

Two people have been arrested and multiple people are in hospital pic.twitter.com/bjl5q3JjP5

— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) November 1, 2025

The video, filmed on a bridge on Brampton Road overlooking Huntingdon’s railway station, shows a stationary train while a number of police officers run down the platform.

We’ve just received a statement from Cambridge Police, who confirm that at 19:39 local time they received reports that multiple people had been stabbed on a train.

“Armed officers attended and the train was stopped at Huntingdon, where two men were arrested. A number of people have been taken to hospital,” the statement says.

“The incident remains ongoing, and the A1307 has been closed as you approach the town centre.”

LNER has urged passengers to cancel or defer travel where they can, but says a limited number of services are running for those who were already travelling.

Passengers are able to use their tickets on the following services without incurring extra cost.

• Avanti West Coast between London Euston, Manchester
• TransPennine Express between Manchester, Leeds and York/Newcastle
• ScotRail between Glasgow Central and Edinburgh Waverley
• Northern between Carlisle and Newcastle
• East Midlands Railway (EMR) between London St Pancras, Leicester and Sheffield
• CrossCountry between Sheffield, Doncaster/Leeds, York and Newcastle/Edinburgh
• Greater Anglia between London Liverpool Street, Stevenage and Peterborough
• Great Northern and Thameslink between London Kings Cross, Stevenage and Peterborough

LNER notes that other services are likely to be busy, and they are working to get trains moving again “as quickly as possible”.

bbc

If ‘Randy Andy’ lost his titles and honors, it’s only logical that ‘Petey’ does, too.

In the aftermath of King Charles stripping his brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his Prince title and evicting him of his home of twenty years at Royal Lodge, Britain seems to be primed for more.

In Parliament, at the House of Commons, members are demanding that failing Prime Minister Keir Starmer follow the King’s example by stripping former US ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson of his peerage over his deep links to Jeffrey Epstein.

The Telegraph reported:

“The removal of titles from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor on Thursday sparked renewed calls from Labour MPs for Lord Mandelson to lose his honor.

The King took the unprecedented step following weeks of allegations surrounding Mountbatten Windsor’s friendship with Epstein, the pedophile financier. These included the revelation that he had remained in touch with the pedophile longer than he had admitted.”

Labour MPs urged the Prime Minister to take similar action against Lord Mandelson, who was sacked from the role of US ambassador over his friendship with Epstein.

“The Labour peer was fired from his role in Washington in September after leaked emails revealed he had sent messages of support to Epstein as he faced jail for sex offences.

He consoled and counselled Epstein and encouraged him to fight for early release, telling him ‘your friends stay with you and love you’.”

Lord Mandelson remains a member of the party and a peer in the House of Lords.

“For Lord Mandelson to lose the whip, the Government would need to pass an Act of Parliament. The last time that this occurred was in 1917 on the eve of the First World War.”

Stephen Flynn, SNP leader argued that ‘whether Keir Starmer likes it or not’, Peter Mandelson is deeply implicated in the Epstein scandal, saying that ‘the allegations may be different, but the consequences must be the same’.

“Lord Mandelson needs to give three months’ notice to the Labour whips in the House of Lords should he want to return to Parliament. He has not yet done so.”

thegatewaypundit

NETHERLANDS: In Amsterdam, a migrant says “women who do not submit to the rules of Islam and the Quran should be enslaved”.

A savage like this is a danger to women and does not belong anywhere in the civilized world! pic.twitter.com/jEduw7mkwb

— Dr. Maalouf ‏ (@realMaalouf) October 30, 2025

Where did he get this idea? From Islam. The Qur’an assumes that infidel women will be taken captive, referring to them as the “captives of the right hand” and specifying that their captors can have sexual relations with them (4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30).

jihadwatch