Month: September 2025

A self-described “child-protection organization” which campaigned for normalizing pedophilia as a sexual identity has ceased operations citing a “shift” in the political “climate.” Established in 2018, the Prostasia Foundation was a charity registered in the state of California that has advocated for the rights of “minor-attracted persons,” or MAPs.

Despite claiming to be motivated by a desire to eradicate child sexual abuse, the organization’s efforts had dedicated themselves to crusades against child pornography bans, letter-writing campaigns to state representatives demanding child-like sex dolls be kept legal, and funding research into “fantasy sexual outlets” for pedophiles. Prostasia has also condemned anti-pedophile sentiment as harmful “Nazi-like” rhetoric and called for its mass censorship across social media.

A recent announcement published in Prostasia’s September Newsletter explains that the charity has terminated operations, with the charity’s blog and social media accounts being permanently archived.

“When Prostasia was founded in 2018, there was a spirit of greater openness to evidence-based discussions of CSA and its connection with pedophilia and to non-carceral approaches to preventing sexual violence,” reads the statement. “But in the years that followed, until 2021 when Prostasia was at its most active, the climate shifted. Movements across the political spectrum hardened the discourse, and our mission became increasingly contentious.”

Prostasia’s announcement further claims that the organization “faced a persistent wave of misinformation and smear campaigns,” leading to an “uphill battle” to continue their MAP advocacy.

Reduxx has learned that the general manager of Prostasia is a pedophile who once fantasized about "trapping" young boys.

Prostasia, a tax-exempt charity, claims that destigmatizing "minor attraction" will protect children from abuse.https://t.co/XzZo8hK8Rm

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) January 17, 2023

As previously revealed by Reduxx in 2023, one general manager of Prostasia was caught operating pseudonymous online accounts where he admitted to being a pedophile and to masturbating to photos of children.

Though listed on the Prostasia Team Page under the name “Prescott Bayern,” the general manager, whose real name is Lawrence P. Bayern, was active on one of the world’s largest pedophile message boards dedicated to homosexual men who call themselves “boy lovers.” Calling himself “Larry,” Bayern advocated for giving children their own sex dolls and stated that he has had a “desire for adolescents.”

In one forum, Bayern told another participant: “Tomorrow I am going to where ever I can find the most children, ogle and leer at them all day and then go home and self gratify myself until raw.”

For years, Prostasia has collaborated with an organization which calls itself the MAP Support Club, an unregistered group which claims to provide “peer support” for pedophiles, and invites “minor-attracted people” aged 13 years old and up to participate in online chats about “minor attraction”.

Announcing their partnership, Prostasia said, “Since November, 2019, MAP Support Club staff have been in talks with Prostasia Foundation about a public partnership, which is the first such public and formal collaboration in history between a child protection charity and a chat-based support community for minor attracted people.”

Prostasia has also claimed that minors can be pedophiles in order to justify their outreach to children. “Every day, a handful of adolescents around the world are realizing for the first time that they might be pedophiles,” one Prostasia blog post reads. “Can you imagine how awful that must be? I believe that it is helpful for there to be public role models of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs.”

In another article published to the organization’s blog, Prostasia has offered “online ageplay safety tips,” and defines ageplay as “a form of role-play in which at least one of the participants adopts the role or mindset of someone younger—a teenager, child, or even a baby” for sexual purposes.

“Sex-positive movements, such as the LGBTQ+ movement and the organized kink/BDSM community… fight for the rights of sexual minority communities,” the post continues. “According to this philosophy, it doesn’t matter what you think about when you masturbate or have sex. There is no point in questioning why someone should be sexually aroused by kinks such as ageplay.”

The blog post goes on to warn readers to use end-to-end encrypted messaging services when engaging in “ageplay” and recommends applications such as such as Signal, WhatsApp, Wire, Wickr, or Threema. “Also, be careful not to host archives of your chats on unencrypted cloud services… If you are an ageplayer, it pays to be aware of the risks that you may face by engaging in ageplay online: you may run across real minors, predators, or undercover police.”

In 2019, Prostasia hosted a conference discussing “ageplay and child protection” in Oakland, California. Titled “Safewords and Red Lines II: Ageplay and Child Protection,” the workshop billed itself as a collaboration between “kink practitioners and sexologists,” and argued that “sex-positive communities such as kinksters, consensual non-monogamists, and sex workers are well placed to be allies in the fight against child sexual abuse and exploitation.”

Prostasia forced an academic journal to remove research critical of their push to destigmatize pedophilia.

The article, written by Dr. @AlaricNaude, warned of pro-pedophile groups operating as so-called "child protection" advocacy organizations. https://t.co/dpogaCdI9I

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) April 22, 2022

In 2022, a professor who criticized Prostasia had his research article on the activist organization erased after they allegedly bullied the publishing journal into deleting his work.

Dr. Alaric Naudé, a Professor focused on the social sciences and linguistics at Suwon University in South Korea, had his research on Prostasia removed from The British Journal of Sociology and History just 24 hours after it was first published on February 9.

When Dr. Naudé inquired with the Journal on the reason why, he was told Prostasia had contacted them and demanded its removal on the grounds that the group claimed it was defamatory.

The article, titled A Case Study via Sociolinguistic Analysis of [a] Covert Pro-Pedophilia Organization Registered as a Child Protection Charity, focused on how Prostasia claims to be for child protection but builds a narrative framing pedophiles as victims of “an oppressive social structure.”

The following year, two academics who have had leadership roles within Prostasia contributed to the publication of an academic article arguing in favor of providing child pornography to “people who are attracted to children.”

In “Fantasy Sexual Material Use by People with Attractions to Children,” content depicting the rape of children is labeled “fantasy sexual material,” or FSM. The research received funding from Prostasia, and its authors include Gillian Tenbergen, former Executive Director of Prostasia Foundation, and former advisory board member Craig Harper.

The academic article argues that treatment options for pedophiles ought to “address sexual frustration.”

“Specifically in relation to people with sexual attractions to children, the relationship between FSM use and help-seeking and treatment needs should be established… considering sexual fulfillment and satisfaction as an important treatment need might be an increasingly pressing issue.” The articles continues: “FSM could act as a safe sexual outlet that allows for a feeling of release and sense of catharsis, which could reduce a motivation to seek out real children as a sexual partner.”

In addition to promoting the concept of “minor attraction” as a sexual orientation, the Prostasia Foundation has advocated for the use of puberty-halting drugs on children who are labeled “transgender.”

Former Prostasia Director of Communications Noah Berlatsky told Business Insider in 2023 about his “queer family,” while claiming that his son identifies as a transgender woman. “Our daughter came out as bisexual in middle school. In high school, she reassessed and came out as trans and lesbian, Berlatsky wrote. “My daughter is transgender, and my wife is bisexual and nonbinary.”

During his time in a leadership role, Berlatsky produced promotional material for Prostasia via a podcast and video interview series called Prostasia Conversations, beginning in 2020.

Prior to working with Prostasia, Berlatsky had written a book titled “Wonder Woman: Bondage and Feminism,” published by Rutgers University Press in 2017, which dealt with the theme of bondage in the comic book series of the same title. He has also written for various mainstream media outlets, such as The Atlantic, and NBC News.

In a 2021 article for NBC, Berlatsky provides a glowing review of season 3 of Netflix’s comedy drama series “Sex Education.”

Noah Berlatsky: The vulnerability of children, and the indifference and ineffectuality of adults, remains at the center of Netflix’s “Stranger Things.” – @NBCNewsTHINK https://t.co/ygIHEBKUXl

— NBC News (@NBCNews) May 28, 2022

“The students (and indeed the adults) at the fictitious British Moordale Secondary School masturbate, have sex, use contraception, deal with STDs, explore kink and have abortions,” Berlatsky wrote. “All of this is presented with a cheerful lack of censure. The show loves everybody, and, indeed, every body. This utopian depiction of a world in which all are accepted for who they are is exhilarating.”

The following year, he praised Netflix’s popular show “Stranger Things” while arguing against proposed bills seeking to establish greater protections for children in the classroom. Such bills, Berlatsky said, “claim to protect children from sexual discussions in classrooms, but in reality will help criminalize and stigmatize discussion of LGBT identities, and force queer children, and queer teachers, into the closet… adults terrorize children because, ultimately, they are afraid that if children were ever fully empowered, the world would turn upside down.”

But Berlatsky would make headlines after conducting a sympathetic interview with non-binary academic Allyn Walker, formerly an instructor at Old Dominion University, who came to widespread infamy in October of 2021 after utilizing the term “minor attracted people” to refer to pedophiles while speaking on the Prostasia podcast.

Walker, a female-to-male transgender who identifies as non-binary, stated she used the term “minor attracted people” out of consideration for pedophile’s feelings, noting “… I think it’s important to use terminology for groups that members of that group want others to use for them.” She also stated that “MAP advocacy groups like B4U-Act have advocated for use of the term, and they’ve advocated for it primarily because it’s less stigmatizing than other terms like pedophile.”

Walker spoke with Berlatsky in order to promote her book titled “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity.” As outrage mounted on social media, copies of Walker’s PhD dissertation quickly began to circulate, showing Walker had entertained theories regarding allowing pedophiles to access “high quality child pornography” in the belief that this will reduce sexual abuse. 

Allyn Walker, the ex-professor who came under fire for defending "minor attracted people," has been hired at an anti-child sex abuse research center.

Walker had once written about giving pedophiles "high quality child pornography" to prevent offending.https://t.co/FhXoRLaq4A

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) May 13, 2022

Disturbingly, Prostasia has also partnered with a similar pedophile advocacy group called Virtuous Pedophiles (VirPed). Prostasia’s Executive Director Jeremy Malcolm was a signatory to an open letter from the non-profit dated February 8, 2021, condemning BBC’s Channel 4 television series Hunting Paedophiles. Other signatories include Nick Devin, Founder of Virtuous Pedophiles, and J. Michael Bailey, a professor at Northwestern University.

“Just as the media has learned to use the term ‘child sexual abuse material’ in place of ‘child
pornography,’ it is also time that the use of the term “paedophile” to refer to someone who
has committed child sexual abuse was also phased out,” reads the letter.

“The incorrect conflation of paedophilia with child sexual abuse creates a stigma against
help-seeking by people who do have paedophilia, or who think that they might. This
stigma is especially damaging for young people, who are typically in their early teens
when they realize their sexual interests.”

As Reduxx recently revealed, a leading figure at VirPed has allegedly been arrested in Norway and charged with the rape of two children under the age of 14. The charges leveled against the VirPed director stand in direct opposition to the group’s stated goals, and call into question the group’s claims about its own vetting process. Despite the charges against him, “Charlie” is being discussed sympathetically within the VirPed community.

reduxx

In Hanover, there is currently a ‘headscarf discount’ offered by a Muslim hairdresser: women who wear headscarves pay 40 per cent less on Wednesdays. Women without headscarves receive no discount and pay the full price. And now everyone: there is no Islamisation!

One customer – obviously not a Muslim woman wearing a headscarf – quite rightly felt discriminated against and contacted the anti-discrimination office. But instead of intervening immediately, there is discussion about whether the whole thing might be ‘okay’ after all, because it is an ‘offer for a specific customer group’.

The hairdresser – Celal Kilic – a devout Muslim, justifies the discrimination against women who do not wear the battle flag of political Islam on their heads by saying that he has set up a floor where Muslim women can remove their headscarves undisturbed and are only hairdressed by women. The increasingly unbearable Islamic lament: ‘There are few protected services for women who wear headscarves.’ And his employee confirms: ‘Many customers who wear headscarves tell us that they have been cutting or dyeing their own hair for the last few years.’ But this has nothing to do with discrimination or a particular religion, according to the Muslim hairdresser.

Let’s imagine the reverse situation: a discount only for women who do not wear headscarves. Or a special price only for Christians. The outcry would be immense, the media would scream ‘Nazi’, politicians would hold special broadcasts.

Is this discrimination, asks the newspaper HAZ hypocritically behind its paywall. Yes, say experts, sounding the alarm: Bonn-based labour lawyer Gregor Thüsing sees the ‘headscarf discount’ as clear indirect discrimination because the headscarf is a religious symbol and other women are disadvantaged by it. Oldenburg legal scholar Volker Boehme-Neßler is even clearer: for him, it is simply blatant discrimination.

Consequences? None. Only the Muslim headscarf hairdresser is ‘shocked’ by the criticism of his offer – and brazenly emphasises that he wants ‘to bring people together, not drive them apart.’

journalistenwatch

Extreme moral demonisation of political opponents has become standard on the contemporary left — a tactic that mirrors the worst abuses of political rhetoric in recent memory. When public figures equate dissent with Nazism or fascism, they do more than insult — they expel whole categories of citizens from the moral conversation. This video examines how such language corrodes civic trust, normalises intolerance, and makes reasoned democratic disagreement ever harder.

By Tom Armstrong

When Donald Trump landed in Britain this week, the air was thick with anticipation. Many hoped he would blow Starmer’s door down and expose him for the tyrant he is. Of course, the dreary MSM, led by the BBC and Guardian, made out that he’d come to a hostile nation, detested by the public and despised, barely tolerated, by the political class.

Yet the reality was the opposite. Trump was greeted warmly, not only by the Royal Family, who laid on a display of pomp and ceremony unmatched in recent years, but also by most Britons, who received him with quiet approval. The orchestrated protests, no doubt funded by the Establishment and their oligarch friends in the US, were small and tired. The cameras zoomed in on insulting placards, but most people were quietly glad to see Trump treated with respect.

The usually stiff Royals flattered Trump openly. Trump’s speech at Windsor was warm and appreciative, reminding us that the “special relationship” is alive, even if Britain’s politicians undermine it. The President relished the attention, smiling broadly, flirting with Princess Kate, and soaking in the grandeur of British tradition. The contrast was stark: while the Royals honoured him, the people welcomed him, the government and media treated him as though he were, at best, a nuisance to be endured. This tension revealed far more about Britain’s political climate than it did about Trump himself.

To be fair, our robotic weirdo of a Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, did his best to maintain a smooth diplomatic face, but the visit unsettled him. Trump was not content with polite small talk. He gave Starmer blunt advice, in straight language that our own politicians avoid at all costs. Use the military to secure your borders, he said, because a nation that does not control its borders does not control its future. Do a serious trade deal with America, he insisted, because dithering only leaves Britain at the mercy of Brussels and Beijing.

For ordinary Britons, who have long felt that immigration and trade are subjects wrapped in euphemisms and dishonesty, Trump’s candour was a relief. He said openly what many people think: that uncontrolled migration is unsustainable, and that Britain’s place in the world cannot be secured without strong alliances and decisive leadership.

But Trump went further. He raised an issue that lies at the heart of Britain’s malaise: the erosion of free speech. From the prime minister’s lips came the familiar reassurance that Britain “jealously protects” free expression. Yet the evidence tells a different story: People are arrested for social media posts. Police interrogate citizens over tweets. Comedians, authors, and workers find themselves hauled before tribunals because their words offended someone or were deemed “harmful but legal,” a phrase that encapsulates the idea that speech that breaks no law can still be criminalised if it displeases the authorities, a tool for silencing dissent.

The MSM cast Trump’s remarks as meddling, xenophobic, or dangerous, scoffing at his critique of Britain’s speech laws, as if the arrests and prosecutions are figments of the imagination. They sneered at his immigration warnings, dismissing them as racist fearmongering. They downplayed his insistence on a trade deal, portraying it as self-serving. In short, they did what our media does best: woke, Globalist propaganda.

But beneath the sneering was unease, as they know that people are now seeing through the lies. People know what is happening. They see the chilling effect in their own lives, where speaking too bluntly can cost you your job, your reputation, or even your freedom.

Seeing an American president delivering their message to our treasonous politicians was gratifying. His words cut through the fog of lies that dominates Westminster politics. Where our politicians mutter about “managing migration flows,” Trump said, “secure your borders.” Where they prattle about “safeguarding online environments,” Trump said, “protect free speech.” Where they dither over “aligning regulatory frameworks,” Trump said, “make a trade deal.” Trump embarrasses them not because he is crude or brash but because he is honest. He says what the public knows to be true but what ‘elites’ try to suppress.

While the press portrays Trump as a pariah, many conservatives here wish he’d gone further in public, denouncing the state’s attack on free speech and its lunatic multiculturalism. I hope he did in private.

All this is not a uniquely British phenomenon. Much of Western Europe is even further down the road to serfdom, and the forces behind it remain active and strong in the US. After all, much of this lunacy originated in US academia. The philosophy behind “hate speech” laws, the obsession with policing “misinformation,” and the bureaucratic creep into what can and cannot be said online are still present in the US. So, our fight is your fight.

The trade issue is instructive. Britain voted for Brexit to reclaim sovereignty, yet years later, our government still refuses to embrace its opportunities. They talk endlessly about “partnerships” and “alignments,” but they shy away from doing anything positive, especially with America. Brussels is the British political class’s natural home. Trump’s push for a strong US–UK trade deal was a reminder that sovereignty is not merely about leaving the European Union but about seizing the chance to act independently. Sovereignty is wasted if it is not used, and Britain’s Establishment refuses to use it.

Trump showed that Britain’s political class has aligned itself with a globalist agenda that prioritises control over freedom, managed decline over ambition, and ideological conformity over honest debate. The government’s rhetoric about “protecting democracy” is a cover for restricting it. The media’s attacks on Trump are a proxy for attacks on anyone who dares to challenge woke orthodoxy. The hostility toward free speech is deliberate. Speech is dangerous to elites because it empowers the people.

That is why Trump’s visit mattered. It revealed, in sharp relief, the fault line between the rulers and the ruled. The Royals flattered him, the people welcomed him, the government endured him, and the media sneered. But in the end, what will linger is not the pomp of Windsor or the headlines of the Guardian, but the truth he spoke. Free speech is not dead in Britain, but it is under threat as never before, and with it the very liberty that once defined this nation.

For in the end, liberty does not disappear in a single stroke. It erodes through silence, through self-censorship, through governments that regulate opinions and media that suppress dissent. Britain is proof. Trump’s words in London were not just for us. They were also for you.

americanthinker

Islamic State has issued a fresh call for terror attacks across Britain, the United States, Europe, and beyond, urging followers to target Christians, Jews, and their “allies” in what it calls revenge for Israel’s ongoing offensive in Gaza.

In an online message titled O Zealous Monotheists, ISIS spokesman Abu Hudhaifa al-Ansari told supporters to “chase your prey… in the streets and roads of precious America, Europe, and the world. Break into their homes, kill them, and punish them by any means you can.”

The statement, circulated on extremist channels, detailed methods including bombings, shootings, stabbings, and vehicle attacks, saying militants should “perfect the plans and diversify the operations” to “avenge Muslims in Palestine, Iraq, Syria, and all Muslim lands.”

The call comes as Israeli forces intensify their ground assault on Gaza City, where hundreds of thousands of civilians remain trapped amid severe shortages of food and medicine. Israel launched the operation after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack that killed around 1,200 people and saw more than 250 taken hostage.

On Wednesday, the Israel Defense Forces said it had hit over 150 targets in Gaza in two days, insisting its military campaign aims to dismantle Hamas and free remaining hostages.

British authorities have not yet commented publicly on the ISIS statement, which echoes previous calls by the group to inspire so-called lone-wolf attacks across Western cities.

europeanconservative

A trans-identified male convicted of sexually assaulting his own 5-year-old daughter is currently being held in a women’s prison in Australia. Autumn Tulip Harper, who was anonymized in court records as “Hilary Maloney,” was sentenced to 4 years in prison for creating horrific child sexual abuse material of his own child and distributing it to a pedophile lover.

Harper, 25, was first identified as a suspect in the production of vile child sexual abuse content after an American pedophile he had been communicating with was arrested in September of 2023. A forensic examination of the pedophile’s devices found that Harper had sent him pornographic images and videos of a young girl via Discord. After identifying Harper as the owner of the account the content had originated from, police in the United States notified Australian authorities.

Shortly after, police raided Harper’s home in Clayton South, Victoria, and seized his electronic devices. An examination of his cellphone found he had produced 77 files categorized as child abuse material between May and June of 2023. The female child in the materials was identified as Harper’s own 5-year-old daughter.

Reduxx has chosen to withhold Harper’s birth name in order to protect the identity of his young victim.

Shortly after Harper pleaded guilty, an unknown individual vandalized his Facebook profile, changing the banner to read “I’m a pedo” and providing updates on Harper’s case through his account. The posts and account were deleted shortly before the sentence was delivered.

According to sentencing records, Harper had been in an online BDSM relationship with the American pedophile, who encouraged him to sexually abuse his daughter for his own sexual gratification.

Harper sent the other man a range of images of his daughter, including of her naked, in the shower, and of him sexually posing with her. The court also details there were several videos of Harper kissing the child’s labia, naked buttocks, and licking her anal region. In one of these videos, Harper is heard asking the girl if she “likes it” to which the child clearly responds “no.”

From an analysis of the video and photo evidence, police determined that Harper had directly sexually abused the girl on at least 19 separate occasions in the course of just one month. The sexual abuse media was then sent to the American pedophile, who Harper referred to as his “Master.” The man would then heap praise upon Harper, telling him how “impressed” and aroused he was by him, and calling him a “good girl.”

Despite being arrested for the serious crime in September of 2023, Harper was released on bail and was allowed to remain free throughout the duration of the trial. Harper was also afforded anonymity in court records, with his name being changed to “Hilary Maloney” throughout the proceedings.

During the trial, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Rajan Darjee was called upon to interview Harper and create a profile of his offending. Disturbingly, Darjee framed Harper as though he were a “female” who had been “pressured” by a male into committing the offenses.

Darjee told the court that Harper would not need any “specific interventions to prevent further sexual offending” and dismissed the need for sex offender treatment. He also denied that Harper had a paraphilic disorder, and argued that Harper had no sexual attraction to children.

Judge Nola Karapanagiotidis similarly highlighted Harper’s “gender dysphoria” and experiences with “transphobia” as mitigating factors, and appeared to accept the defense’s argument that he only committed the abuse to be “validated … as a woman and a sexual person.”

Both Harper’s arrest and trial were completed in relative silence, with no police releases or domestic media indicating the incident had occurred. Reduxx was first to cover Harper’s case after a source close to the court came forward to provide information on Harper and his charges.

Now, Reduxx has learned that Harper has been housed in a women’s facility in Victoria on the basis of his self-declared “gender identity.”

Harper is being held at the Dame Phyllis Frost Correctional Centre, which has previously attracted controversy for housing transgender sex offenders amongst the female inmates.

In 2022, women at the prison told the Herald Sun that the transgender male offender was moved to the Murray Protection Unit on July 5. While the identity of the transferred inmate was not released, the details from the criminal’s background mirror those of Lisa Jones, a trans-identified male who had been sentenced to 3 years and 3 months in prison for sexually assaulting a woman in 2021.

Jones, aged 44 at the time, had stalked a woman as she was walking home on Lennox Street in Richmond before grabbing her and attempting to rape her. While pinning her down, Jones repeated: “Why won’t you lay down and have sex with me?”

The woman had been on a phone call with her mother at the time, and began screaming her location into the receiver before Jones snatched the phone away and disconnected the call. 

Jones put his hands down the woman’s underwear and tried to pull down the victim’s jeans, but she was able to successfully fight him off as bystanders came rushing to her aid. Jones was ultimately detained after some bystanders chased him down as he tried to flee the scene.

“I didn’t do anything, it was her fault,” Jones, whose birth name is presently unknown, was reported to have said.

Despite the sentencing judge noting that the attack had been “brazen and opportunistic” against a complete stranger, Jones was placed in a facility with women.

While each state in Australia has different policies with respect to housing transgender inmates, according to Women’s Forum, New South Wales, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory and Tasmania “have a ‘self-identification policy’, meaning that prisoners are meant to be placed in a facility based on how they identify, unless there are safety concerns or doubts around the authenticity of the prisoner’s gender identification.”

reduxx

Dutch residents in a small village in Groningen are up in arms after supposed asylum seekers have been harassing, robbing, and assaulting their children.

The small village of Uithuizen on the north coast of the Netherlands has experienced a breakdown in the social order, as young migrants living in a local emergency asylum centre are reported to be terrorising local children and vandalising village infrastructure.

According to a report from Dutch daily De Telegraaf, residents have complained that their children have been robbed and assaulted by the migrants.

Last Wednesday, a local boy was hospitalised after being hit in the head with a shovel. The following day, an autistic twelve-year-old boy had his skateboard stolen by a group of supposed asylum seekers.

Recounting the incident, his mother wrote on social media: “One of the three ran away with it. The other two saw that he called me, picked up his phone and threw it to the ground.

“He has autism and almost never goes out alone. So now this is no longer possible and he has completely lost his freedom.”

Discussing the state of the village, one local mother told the Dutch paper: “My children are no longer allowed to go to the sports park alone.”

She added that many are concerned about the recent violence: “All the parents in the schoolyard are talking about it.”

The local sports park is said to be one of the hangouts for the young migrants, who are also alleged to have committed vandalism against the football pitch, allegedly breaking the glass windows at the stands so many times that the local football club have decided to stop replacing them until they can find a solution to prevent it from happening again.

The issue of mass migration and the asylum system are set to be a key issue in next month’s general election, which was sparked after populist Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders withdrew his party from the government after liberal coalition partner parties refused to back his hard-line crackdown on migration.

Migration was the subject of debate in the Dutch parliament on Wednesday, with Frans Timmermans, the long-time Eurocrat and current leader of the GreenLeft–Labour alliance, advocating for more asylum centres to be put up across the country and against criminalising illegal immigration.

Conversely, Mr Wilders, who has advocated for an effective shutdown of asylum seekers into the country, declared that the Netherlands has already “become one big asylum seekers’ centre,” adding that he “won’t rest until they are all gone.”

The PVV leader warned that the upcoming October elections represent “D-Day” for the Dutch, saying: “It is not 5 to 12 but half past 1! These elections are the last chance to save the Netherlands!”

breitbart

Cardinal Gerhard Müller has said that there was an “infiltration” of Germany by foreigners and warns that Germany could become a Muslim-majority country where Christians are “second-class citizens.”

In a recent interview with Catholic journalist Diane Montagna, the former prefect of the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith said that leftist politicians and activists “are instrumentalizing Islam to undermine Christian identity and Western tradition and culture.”

“In England, for example, wokeism in its initial phase uses Islamism as a tool to weaken Christian culture and tradition,” the German cardinal said. “Currently, in tragic cases – such as when a girl is violated by several Muslim men – the girl is more likely to go to jail than the perpetrators.”

“I hope that we will see meaningful change in England with the next elections,” he added.

Müller said that Muslims by and large will not accept woke ideology, and that leftist ideologues will “be the next victims of radical Islamists.”

“Islam rejects the dignity of women, and its moral framework has nothing in common with the aims of wokeism, one of which is to homosexualize society and thought,” he stated.

Asked about his native Germany, Müller said that it is “similar” to England.

“On average, there are eighteen knife attacks each day, and two or three girls or young women are victims of gang rape,” he lamented.

“There are also growing challenges in schools, where Muslim children often outnumber Christian children, but few are willing to confront this reality.”

“Even many bishops seem not to fully grasp the seriousness of the situation,” he added.

The German prelate warned that his home country “could become like North Africa”:

Until the seventh century, it was a completely Catholic region, albeit with challenges such as the Donatists. But then Islam arrived, and five hundred years later, the population had become entirely Muslim.

Were this to occur, Christians would become second-class citizens.

Müller used the example of his hometown to show the radical transformation German cities have undergone in the past decades:

My hometown of Mainz, for example, was seventy percent Catholic fifty years ago; today, due to secularization, migration, and other factors, that figure has fallen to twenty-seven percent. Currently, thirty percent of the country’s population are not ethnically German, and they are predominantly young. In twenty to thirty years, Islam could become the dominant religion.

When asked by Montagna if he really believed Germany could become a Muslim nation, Müller replied, “It already is, in many ways. Muslims dominate public life, in part because politicians live in fear of them.”

Reiterating the paradoxical alliance between Islam and the radical left, he said, “The former communist party in eastern Germany is absolutely pro-Islam. Even though their ideology is entirely Marxist and atheistic, they have formed an alliance with Muslims, who profess belief in one God to whom all must submit. It is an absolute contradiction, yet it serves the purpose of de-Christianizing the West.”

“I believe young Germans are no longer able to defend themselves; in effect, they have already lost the battle,” Müller said, lamenting, “In truth, there was no battle – it was an infiltration.”

“One million people arrived from Syria, many without speaking German,” the cardinal continued. “Germany offered them financial support and a developed infrastructure without requiring work. For them, it seems like an earthly paradise – until they exhaust the resources.”

Müller warned that a civil war would become increasingly realistic with a growing foreign population living in Germany.

“Once that occurs, conflict could arise, potentially ending in civil war, but amongst themselves, similar to what we have seen in Syria.”

lifesitenews

Three males competed in a women’s cycling competition in Livermore, California this week, dominating the race and seizing first prize from a female athlete.

“Li” (Liam) King, Jordan Johnson, and “Chelsea” (Connor) Wolfe all registered to compete in the women’s fixed category of the Oakland Grand Prix, which took place on September 14. King, whose Instagram bio notes that he uses “they/them/she/her” pronouns, came in first place. He has previously won cycling competitions in the “nonbinary” (mixed sex) category. 

According to women’s advocacy group WomenAreReal, the female competitors stood no chance against King.

“He dominated this race from the start. It wasn’t even really a race at all, he was just way out front the entire time,” the group posted to X.

Four members of WomenAreReal were in attendance for the race to support the female athletes, carrying placards with slogans condemning the participation of males in women’s sport. One of the advocates had a sign reading “NO MALES IN FEMALE CYCLING,” while others called out USA Cycling directory for failing to protect the women’s category.

Speaking to Reduxx, Beth Bourne of WomenAreReal said that she had to call police after race officials became hostile and aggressive towards her group at the event. Bourne states that one male race official grabbed her cell phone, ripped one of her signs, and threw them into the trash.

“Within the first two minutes o the race going off, I thought I would ask the USA cycling race officials if they were aware of any men in the women’s single speed fixie race. The official suggested I talk with the race organizer, and as I was asking the question, I was assaulted,” Bourne says. “First by a woman who tried to block my phone and then actually took my phone from me. And then seconds after that, a man named ‘James’ surprise attacked me, cussing in my face and then stealing my phone out of my hand. He then grabbed my signs and threw them in the trash can before trying to push me away with an old pizza box.”

Bourne explains that she has showed up to many sports events to support female athletes as a representative of WomenAreReal, but was shocked at the level of aggression and hostility she faced at the race.

“I have been in at least two or three dozen protest situations around girls and women’s sports, but until today I have never experienced this level of anger or hatred or violence towards me and the other women who were with me,” she says. “It’s shocking to think that I can’t attend a bike race sanctioned by USA cycling in the public streets of Livermore, California, and share my views on protecting women’s sports from discrimination without risking my safety.”

🚨Help me track down this guy and his employer.

He destroyed my Save Women’s Sports sign today in Livermore, CA. @LivermorePolice @usacycling @AttorneyHarmeet https://t.co/UCj7JdmOe0 pic.twitter.com/Ef639QWyjw

— Beth Bourne (@bourne_beth2345) September 15, 2025

This Oakland Grand Prix represented one of the last events where males will be able to unfairly compete against women in USA Cycling events. The organization recently adopted a new policy, set to take effect on September 15, 2025, which brings their sporting categories into alignment with President Trump’s February 2025 Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.

From the new policy: “Pursuant to the requirements set out above, the Women’s Category is limited to individuals who meet the following definition of female: ‘Female means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.’ For purposes of applying this requirement, an individual who was not identified as female at birth may not participate in the Women’s Category at any Competitive Event.”

One of the other male competitors, Chelsea Wolfe, garnered media attention this week for celebrating the assassination of Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk, prompting USA Cycling to issue a statement to Fox News to denounce Wolfe’s comments. Wolfe shared a news story about Kirk’s murder with a “We did it!” caption on his Instagram story. He also referred to Kirk as a “Nazi” in another.

“The views of current and former national team athletes are their own and do not reflect those of USA Cycling. Chelsea Wolfe has not been a member of the USA Cycling National Team or a member of USA Cycling since 2023,” the organization said.

In 2023, Wolfe received sympathetic media coverage in Bicycling magazine after the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) adopted a rule to ban transgender identified males who transitioned after puberty from their female category. Wolfe described the new rule banning him from the female category as having made his world “crumble.”

The third male competitor, Jordan Johnson, also has a history of winning female races. He can be seen on the podium taking first prize at a Colorado Bicycle Racing Association event in 2021, third place in another women’s event later that year, second place in a 2022 USA Cycling Steel City Road Race, and first place in a 2022 Louisville Criterium race.

reduxx

An Afghan man desperate to return home to his country says he got naked and flashed three female French police officers, a move he said was done to help push authorities into sending him back home. French authorities, however, say that it is not possible to send the Afghan repeat offender home.

In court, when asked about his actions, the 33-year-old unemployed migrant said, in his native language, “I got naked so the police officers would understand my situation. If they don’t send me back to Afghanistan, I’ll start getting naked every time. But everything’s fine for me, even if it’s complicated to complete administrative procedures, not speaking French,” he said, according to a report from French news outlet Le Télégramme.

He was taken into custody on Sept. 1 for sexual assault. During a police questioning, he caused a commotion by completely undressing in front of three female officers and refusing to put his clothes back on. He is being tried in court for indecent exposure.

The man has multiple arrests for various offenses, including a previous sexual assault against a nurse in a hospital in Angoulême, France. He was already under judicial supervision at the time he flashed the three female officers.

The judge also asked him why he only undressed in front of female officers, but the man remained silent in response to this question.

One of the main issues with the man being sent home is that he, like many illegal migrants, has no passport. Many toss their passport before entering Europe in order to complicate efforts for authorities to deport them back home, however, in chaotic countries like Afghanistan, many citizens fail to obtain a passport in the first place.

“How can we send you back to your country since you don’t have a passport? Your country will not accept you.” the judge asked the man.

The Afghan has a troubled history, with his medical report indicating he has “personality disorders, a suicide attempt, and fluctuating responses.”

However, the man was not exactly poor before he left Afghanistan. In fact, his medical report indicated that he claimed to have paid smugglers €27,000 to leave his country. He says he now wants to return to Afghanistan to his wife and five children.

His lawyer argued, “There has been no recent psychiatric assessment to determine his condition at the time of these events. It is not certain that he understands the sentence that will be handed down. It is an act of protest, without any sexual provocation. He has a residence permit in France, but he must renounce it to be able to return to his country.” The lawyer added, “But in the meantime, he needs care.”

The lawyer for the police officers recounted, “This is the first time in 12 years of service that these three women have experienced such a situation. This man behaved in such a way, even though he was about to be released, and he fully understood what the interpreter was translating for him.”

The prosecutor requested eight months in prison for the Afghan man, stating, “He has no fixed address, and his previous judicial supervision had no effect on him. His psychiatric assessment is recent, dating from March 2025: It is significant in highlighting an impairment of judgment. But he knows what he’s doing when he gets naked. He refused to get dressed, even going so far as to remove the blanket the officers had handed him to hide his genitals. He behaved dangerously, with a desire to commit this offense.” The prosecutor also noted that the officers filed a complaint because of his “disturbing attitude,” which was similar to his behavior with the nurse he assaulted.

The court ultimately sentenced the man to six months in prison and ordered him to pay €200 in damages to each of the three police officers.

rmx