Month: September 2025

An explosion occurred in the center of the Norwegian capital, Oslo, on Tuesday, and one person was detained, police said, adding that an object that appeared to be a hand grenade was defused at the scene. The gang war that is also raging in Sweden appears to have reached Norway.

“There were no reports of injuries after the incident that occurred in the evening near Oslo Met, a higher education institution in the Norwegian capital,” the police said.

Speaking to the media at the scene, Brian Skotnes, the head of operations for the Oslo police, confirmed the explosion, adding that an unexploded object, which appeared to be a hand grenade, was also found and detonated.

🚨 BREAKING

A powerful explosion occurred in Oslo's Pilestredet, triggering a swift response from emergency services.

Police have mobilized extensive resources and evacuated nearby trams. pic.twitter.com/cvGdRytQru

— American Press 🗽 (@americanspress) September 23, 2025

No further details were released about the circumstances of the incident or the identity of the arrested man.

According to the state-run radio and television company NRK, the suspect is a minor.

Brian Skotnes said they are looking for additional suspects.

BREAKING
Norway: Suspected failed terror attack near the synagogue in Oslo. A loud explosion was reported, and grenades along with other explosives were observed. pic.twitter.com/tXN3byaFHK

— On Elpeleg 🎗️ (@onelpeleg) September 23, 2025

Photos taken by witnesses and published in the press showed a grenade lying on a pedestrian crossing, a structure likely destroyed in a controlled manner by the police.

Authorities set up a security cordon around the scene and asked residents to stay home while they inspect for any remaining explosive devices.

Norway has a low crime rate, but in recent months the gang war raging in neighboring Sweden has reached the country.

rmx

If France’s political elite refuses to answer former MEP Philippe de Villiers’ call for a referendum on immigration, he warned the anger could spill into the streets, much like the UK’s protests against mass migration.

Launched on September 5, the petition rapidly snowballed, hitting 1.7 million names by September 20.

De Villiers, founder of the sovereigntist Movement for France, insists immigration is no longer “one issue among others” but the defining question that shapes them all.

“Millions of French people have signed and are demanding to be heard,” de Villiers declared in an interview with Le Journal du Dimanche.

“If their voices are ignored by the occupant of the Élysée [Emmanuel Macron], then a new chapter will begin.”

The former MEP described the petition as the “French mirror of Britain’s grassroots revolt”.

De Villiers said his petition focuses on two “vital” demands:  Halting uncontrolled immigration and breaking what he calls the stranglehold on free speech.

“In France, as in England, immigration has become a forbidden subject,” he warned.

The petition denounces the Schengen accords, mass regularisations and successive governments that have, in de Villiers’ words, organised “the disappearance of a people”.

A large number of protesters took to the streets of London for the Unite the Kingdom rally, spearheaded by anti-Islam campaigner and prominent right-wing activist Tommy Robinson.https://t.co/ghj9ccxWP1

— Brussels Signal (@brusselssignal) September 15, 2025

Not everyone is convinced by the seemingly impressive signature count. The website hosting the petition, operated by the Lagardère Group, does not verify identities or email addresses, raising questions about its accuracy.

Left-wing MP Antoine Léaument went further, denouncing the petition as a “scam”.

He claims he never signed it, yet still received a confirmation email at his parliamentary address.

“This identity theft is punishable under article 226-4-1 of the penal code: one year in prison, €15,000 fine,” he said on September 22.

For de Villiers, the referendum on immigration is about ” democracy”.

He recalled 2005, when French voters rejected the proposed European Union Constitution, only for elites to ram it through theEuropean Parliament anyway.

“It was a democratic hold-up,” he said, framing the current immigration fight as part of the same struggle between the people and the ruling class.

brusselssignal

With the exception of little white girls systematically raped by Pakistani Muslims, ‘far-right gammons’ (native white people) offensively waving flags in their own capital city and homeless veterans sleeping rough on the streets, just about every other tranche of British society has a dedicated activist group, demanding they get special treatment. While you may be fully on board with Black Lives Matter, Stonewall, Mermaids, and the Muslim Council of Britain, how concerned are you with the plight of Afghan rapists? Not nearly enough, I’d have thought.

But you ought to be. That, one can only assume, is the conclusion to draw from Westminster Magistrates’ Court, wherein Abdul Ahmadzai is currently appealing deportation. Having fled across the Channel post-conviction for raping a 14-year-old girl in France, Ahmadzai is now represented by a lawyer concerned about Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: “No one shall be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

One wonders what terrifying degree of heinous torture this might refer to. Is it the prospect of three Cordon Bleu meals a day that is troubling Ahmadzai, the Brigitte Bardot lookalikes likely to be ‘manning’ the jails, or the Johnny Hallyday mixtape emanating from the adjacent cell? Nope. In fact, it’s the cell size. According to Ahmadzai’s lawyer, there is the very “real risk” that his client could be “detained in a space fewer [sic] than three metres squared” if he were sent back to Paris.

Ahmadzai’s appeal has been adjourned until October, until which time he will remain in custody—presumably enjoying at least three square metres of prime real estate. Assuming that French prisons truly are torturous, I can’t help wondering why the French authorities aren’t under pressure to ship their entire prison population across the Channel; and, more to the point, whether it will be Macron or Starmer who first suggests doing so?

While Ahmadzai’s case may sound absurd, it is in fact bread and butter to our ECHR overlords and the human rights lawyers who routinely employ specious pretexts to foist violent criminals on the British public. To give a comprehensive account of all such abuses would probably require a biblical tome, so allow me to just give you the recent highlights:

• Konrad Makocki, a Polish serial criminal with nine convictions, including violence and domestic abuse, successfully blocked his deportation on the grounds that he had become a “father figure” to his nephew. Not only would expulsion therefore breach his “right to a family life,” it would also cause his nephew to suffer a “disproportionate” impact if his uncle were deported.
• Fatmir Bleta, an Albanian national convicted in absentia of shooting a man in the head with a Kalashnikov rifle, won the right to remain in the UK on the grounds that not being entitled to a re-trial would breach his Article 6 human rights.
• An anonymous Pakistani father, jailed for 18 months after attempting sex with “barely pubescent” girls, successfully avoided deportation on the basis that it would prove “unduly harsh on his children to be without their father.”
• Klevis Disha, an Albanian, first appeared on UK shores as an unaccompanied minor. Giving a false name and falsely claiming to have been born in the former Yugoslavia, Disha was stripped of his citizenship in 2021, after serving two years in prison when caught with the £300,000 ‘proceeds of crime.’ Astonishingly, Disha cannot be deported because of his son’s aversion to ‘foreign’ chicken nuggets.
• William George, a ‘Belgian’ gang member convicted of manslaughter back in 2018, cannot be deported after a six-year Home Office battle. Apparently, EU nationals who have lived in Britain for an extended period can only be deported on “imperative grounds of public security.” Clearly, running a rival gang member over with a car and stabbing him in the neck doesn’t quite meet that threshold?
• Ernesto Elliott, a Jamaican, successfully dodged deportation thanks to his “right to a family life.” In gratitude, Elliott went on to add murder to his extensive rap sheet, alongside knife, drug, and firearm offences. This case was particularly noteworthy, as it involved the flight famously grounded by left-wing MPs and celebrities. They wrote an open letter to then-Prime Minister Johnson, demanding all further deportations be cancelled because of the “unacceptable risk of removing anyone with a potential Windrush claim”.

Thanks to our membership of the ECHR, all Britain has to do then is attract criminals without families, children, claustrophobia, or any specific dietary requirements.

On a more serious note, at no point in any of these proceedings does it appear to have occurred to the lawyers, the judges or the ECHR itself that maybe, just maybe, the human rights of the conned, assaulted, stabbed, raped and murdered should have taken priority over that of their assailants. But then, this is Britain: a country whose far-left government publicly declares the rights of illegal immigrants trump those of the native population and somehow remains in power without the Palace of Westminster being razed to the ground.

The British public are being taken for fools. None of this nonsense would pass muster if you were caught with your pants down in almost any other country on earth. What to do, however? There is a lot of talk about derogating from the ECHR, declaring a national emergency, processing illegals and foreign criminals overseas and, eventually, leaving the ECHR. That, I believe, is Reform UK and Nigel Farage’s plan. I am a little concerned, however, that we do not have the time to rerun Brexit.

Here’s what I think we should do instead:

• Declare a state of emergency on day one of a new government.
• Install the Royal Navy in the Channel.
• Tow all invaders back to France, no ifs, no buts.
• Grant all illegals a one-way ticket and a month to leave the country, with those refusing indefinitely detained in disused Army barracks, rapid-build prisons or overseas until such time as they come to their senses.
• Instruct other nations to accept their criminals, or face sanctions / loss of aid.

Certainly, many of our European colleagues will not appreciate this approach. But seriously, what are they going to do—invade us honestly?

europeanconservative

The dark underbelly of leftism is envy — the revenge of the mediocre on the exceptional. Orwell observed the left hates the rich more than it loves the poor, a hatred now extended to nations. The West’s achievements stand as a rebuke to communist terror states. Dalrymple warned that sentimentality is the midwife of brutality, and leftism drips with it. What poses as justice is bitterness clothed in emotion, collapsing under logic, fact and reality.

A hotel migrant has admitted he has been sent to NHS check-ups in taxis costing hundreds of pounds to the taxpayer, while others admitted to working illegally in the UK.

One case involved an Iraqi man, whose asylum claim was rejected, being taken on a 250-mile, £600 trip in a taxi for a knee appointment.

Using the pseudonym “Kadir”, he told the BBC about his experience after the broadcaster gained access to numerous asylum hotels.

Kadir claimed he would have preferred to travel to the appointment by train, but was given “no choice” by the Home Office which had set up the transport.

Migrants are often treated by the same NHS doctor – even if they have been transferred to a different hotel.

Having been told by the driver that the round-trip would cost £600, Kadir said: “Should the Home Office give me the ticket for the train?

“This is the easy way, and they know they spend too much money.”

He added: “We know as well, but we don’t have any choice. It’s crazy.”

It is understood the taxis were booked by an “automated system” at the hotel front desk, and the migrants were not given the option to walk or take public transport.

Kadir lives with his wife and three children in an unnamed hotel, taking up two taxpayer-funded rooms.

He claims to have worked as a translator in his home country before he said he was targeted by criminals.

However, his asylum claim, and two subsequent appeals, have all been rejected by the Home Office due to lack of proof.

His third appeal is currently underway.

Other migrants boldly admitted to working illegally in the UK, including Mohammed, from Afghanistan, who had organised a job for himself before he even arrived in the country.

He did this through the use of contacts from his cousin, who was also working illegally in Britain.

He said his shifts last 10 hours and earn him £20, however he claims he has no choice because his family owes money to people-traffickers.

One hotel security guard said: “You’ve got nothing to occupy these guys, so of course they’re going to go out there and work.”

The contractor used by the Home Office, Clearsprings Ready Homes, paid nearly £350,000 a month for 6,000 taxi journeys with one company, The Sun reported.

Reform UK chairman Dr David Bull said: “If you live here and pay taxes, it’s difficult to see a GP in the first instance.

“But asylum seekers seem to have fast-track access.”

After the claims emerged, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood demanded officials “urgently look into” the use of taxis.

In the year 2024-25, asylum support cost the taxpayer £4.67billion, which was down from £5.38billion the year before.

But just a decade ago, the figure was less than £475million a year.

A spokesman for the Home Office said: “The Home Secretary has asked the department to urgently look into the use of taxis to transfer asylum seekers.”

gbnews

Fergie alleges to have experienced the dark side of Epstein.

We are reporting on all the people around the world who are falling into disgrace because of their close ties to late pedophile and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Right now, controversial Duchess of York Sarah Ferguson is under fire for a resurfaced email she wrote Epstein in which she described him as a ‘steadfast, generous and supreme friend’.

Fergie also ‘humbly apologized’ for criticizing him in public, telling him she understood that he felt ‘hellaciously let down by [her]’.

As a result of the revelations, the Duchess has been dropped as a patron by several charities, such as Julia’s House (children’s hospice); Teenage Cancer Trust; Natasha Allergy Research Foundation; Children’s Literacy Charity; Prevent Breast Cancer; British Heart Foundation; National Foundation for Retired Service Animals.

So, now the York camp has gone to bat on the press, trying to justify her behavior – but it may well backfire and cause even more trouble.

Fergie’s spokesman has told The Telegraph that the incriminating email was a reaction to threats by Epstein, who vowed to ‘destroy her’ using a ‘Hannibal Lecter-style’ voice in a phone call.

“The Duchess’s spokesman told The Telegraph that Epstein was incensed by her description of him as a pedophile and made a ‘chilling’ phone call in which he threatened to take legal action.

‘People don’t understand how terrible Epstein was. I can remember everything about that call. It was a chilling call and I’m surprised anybody was ever friends with him given the way he talked to me. He said he would destroy the York family and he was quite clear on that. He said he would destroy me. He wasn’t shouting. He had a Hannibal Lecter-type voice. It was very cold and calm and really menacing and nasty.”

The problem with this narrative by the Yorks is that they make it sound like the danger was just a defamation lawsuit, when the smell of blackmail is all over it, in the form of compromising information he potentially held on them.

“Mr. Henderson added: ‘He [Epstein] was very, very clear. He said ’I will destroy the family’. The pressure she was put under to protect her family must have been huge. I am sure there were legal actions.

‘And this was long before the Duke’s life had been ruined by his association with Epstein. It was 14 years ago and everyone will do what they have to do to protect their family.”

thegatewaypundit

The killing of Charlie Kirk was an appalling crime. But the aftermath — videos of bystanders smiling at the very moment a man was shot, and posts openly advocating further murders — revealed a political climate that treats opponents as enemies to be eliminated. This is not merely rhetorical excess; it is the erosion of the moral framework that protects pluralism. This video examines the chain from demonising labels to gloating crowds, and warns that without a return to responsible discourse, more violence will follow.

The Netherlands is the second most densely populated country in Europe, and with surging mass immigration, has been experiencing a raging housing crisis for years.

However, despite this crisis, refugees can gain access to social housing in a mere 14 weeks, while the average Dutch citizen must wait up until 12 years. Now, efforts are being made to right this injustice for Dutch citizens with a new bill, but Council of State, the country’s highest legal advisory body, is criticizing any attempt to block housing access to refugees. The authority claims refugees should receive equal treatment, as required by the Dutch constitution.

Of course, the fact that there is no equal treatment currently, and that refugees are gaining access to social housing years before Dutch on waiting lists, does not appear to factor into the Council of State’s concerns, according to Dutch news outlet NOS.nl.

The minister behind the proposal, Mona Keijzer of the BBB party, says she is not backing down. Keijzer’s plan aims to create more affordable housing by ensuring that refugees, or “status holders,” no longer receive priority for housing solely because of their status.

The Council of State argues that the proposal leads to unequal treatment, which is “contrary to the Constitution.” The Council has advised the cabinet not to submit the bill to the House of Representatives.

However, Minister Keijzer is not swayed by the advice.

“That’s kind of how the discussion is conducted in the Netherlands. And that’s a shame,” she said. Regarding the “unconstitutional” judgment, she stated, “The Constitution is not mathematics, it also states that I must take care of public housing for Dutch people.”

Arguments for and Against Priority Status

According to the Council of State, status holders have “an unfavorable starting position on the housing market” because they can only register for a home after arriving in the Netherlands, placing them at the bottom of waiting lists. The Council writes that while the government has proposed other measures to help status holders, it is “unrealistic” to expect them to have a timely effect, so “Permit holders therefore remain behind.”

Keijzer counters that the opposite is true, arguing that Dutch citizens are the ones currently at a disadvantage.

She noted that status holders are entitled to social housing after just 14 weeks, while the waiting lists for other home seekers can be more than 12 years.”

Treating equal cases cannot result in Dutch home seekers being treated unequally,” she said.

“Dutch people in their twenties and thirties live with their parents in the attic or share an apartment with two or three people,” she said on EO radio in August.

She believes that status holders should be expected to find housing in the same ways as other citizens, such as living with family or getting help from their employer.

“We also ask that of Dutch home seekers,” she said. The reception organization COA reports that on average, 6 to 10 percent of released social housing units go to status holders.

Keijzer said she would study the Council of State’s advice but maintained her position, saying, “But I am convinced that the ban on priority for status holders should be introduced.”

Keijzer’s proposal is different from another plan from the far-right PVV party, led by Geert Wilders, which seeks to completely prevent asylum seekers with residency from getting emergency housing declarations, even in cases of homelessness or domestic violence.

While that PVV plan has been adopted by the House of Representatives, Keijzer has stated that she intends to delete it because she believes it is discriminatory and “legally untenable.”

Of course, any real talk of restricting immigration is absent from Keijzer’s position, despite the Netherlands spending an estimated €400 billion on migrants between 1995 and 2019.

The country is not the only one facing a housing crisis, in part due to large waves of migrants. Neighboring Germany is also dealing with the same issue. In 2024, the country spent nearly €17 billion on housing support, with nearly half of it going to foreigners, and even office towers are now being converted to house newcomers.

In a number of shocking cases, senior citizens have even been moved out of their accommodations to make room for migrants.

rmx

Far-left Antifa radicals and anti-Israel demonstrators erupted into violence in Milan on Monday after Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni refused to follow fellow European nations in recognising Palestine as a state.

Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi said that pro-Gaza protesters “deliberately” attacked police in Milan, leaving around 60 officers injured, Italian wire service ANSA reported.

Piantedosi said that “numerous troublemakers” attempted to exploit public sympathy over the Middle East war to  “commit the usual acts of pure and simple violence.”

The local Corriere della Sera newspaper said that agitators attacked police with street cobblestones, glass bottles, garbage cans, bicycles, and stones. Police attempted to disperse the mobs with teargas, however, the Milanese daily said that it only “fed the anger” of the crowds, who reportedly sang “it will be Intifada here too”. In total, around 15,000 were present in Milan.

According to broadcaster RAI, commuters faced hours of delays after protesters broke into the city’s Central train station, as well as the Porta Garibaldi and Rogoredo stations. Radicals were seen breaking through the gates of the main train station, smashing glass, and clashing with police.

Protests took place in around 80 cities and towns across Italy as labour unions went on strike on Monday, including Rome where around 50,000 demonstrated. Protesters also disrupted public transport in Turin and in Naples demonstrators were seen burning images of Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu and Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

The protests came after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government in Rome refused to go along with moves by London and Paris to officially recognise Palestine as a state, despite — as critics note — the territory having no defined borders, constitution, or democratically legitimate government.

Meloni has said that although she personally supports the notion of Palestinian statehood, she has argued that officially recognising it before it is established on the ground could be counterproductive.

“If something that doesn’t exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn’t,” she said in July.

Responding to the violence in Milan, Meloni said: “Outrageous images coming from Milan: self-proclaimed ‘pro-Pal’ individuals, self-proclaimed ‘Antifa’ members, self-proclaimed ‘pacifists’ who wreak havoc on the train station and provoke clashes with law enforcement.

“Violence and destruction that have nothing to do with solidarity and that will not change a single thing in the lives of people in Gaza, but will have concrete consequences for Italian citizens, who will end up suffering and paying for the damages caused by these thugs.”

Meloni’s condemnation of Antifa leftists comes shortly after U.S. President Trump designated the anarcho-communist collective as a terrorist organisation in the wake of the killing of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Trump was followed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who said last week that Hungary would also designate Antifa as a terror group.

breitbart

The assassination of Charlie Kirk in the United States could well incite further acts of violence. In France, for several weeks now, prominent figures on the Right have been explicitly targeted by the far Left and subjected to death threats. Despite growing awareness that an attack could happen at any moment, the judicial authorities remain wilfully indifferent. Lacking any sense of responsibility, they are allowing these individuals to live in fear.

By coincidence, on the very day that we learned with horror and astonishment of the murder of Charlie Kirk on the Utah Valley campus, French essayists Dora Moutot and Marguerite Stern, known for their fight against the transgender lobby, announced the release of a video intended to alert their supporters to the dangers they have been facing for many months and the inaction of the authorities.

Since the publication of their essay Transmania, which exposes the delusions of transgender ideology and the deadly strategy of its supporters, the two women have been the target of repeated death threats and have found the slogan “a TERF (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist), a bullet” posted, tagged and shouted everywhere they go.

The death of Charlie Kirk—and moreover, the murky links between his murderer and the transgender community—deeply resonated with them. They denounce the transgender terrorism, which has proven its existence through several sordid killings.

On September 10th, Dora Moutot posted on X:

Just today, someone announced that we would be targeted with bullets on September 10th. But on the other side of the Atlantic, it was Charlie who took the bullets, shot down like a rabbit in front of the crowd during his conference by a mentally ill person whose brain was probably eaten away by wokeism. Charlie will never come back.

This news traumatises me. Really. I’m afraid that tomorrow it will be Marguerite or me.

For both women, it’s obvious: the same thing could happen in France. And it could happen all the more so because the authorities are in denial.

On September 11th, the day after Charlie Kirk’s death, Moutot and Stern published a video denouncing the Paris public prosecutor’s decision to dismiss a complaint they had filed against an ‘anti-fascist’ website that had explicitly threatened them with death. “In the open letter published by an anti-fascist website, these people admit to attempted murder. They claim to have burned down a building where Marguerite Stern was supposed to give a lecture, and they say they are coming armed to our rallies,” Dora Moutot told Le Figaro. However, the courts dismissed their complaint on the grounds that “the investigation did not identify the person who committed the offence.” The open letter is still online. They protested, but the prosecutor upheld the decision not to proceed—raising serious suspicions of political hostility in the decision.

Their lawyer, Louis Cailliez, decided to publicise this judicial scandal. The entire procedure was botched, not to say sabotaged. The names and numbers of the suspects given to the investigators contained altered letters or numbers, preventing any identification or prosecution. Cailliez pointed out no fewer than eleven glaring errors. He reported them to the public prosecutor’s office, which nevertheless refused to reverse its decision and closed the case.

Moutot and Stern are not the only ones affected. On X, calls for violence targeting French right-wing influencers have multiplied. They are explicit and unequivocal but do not seem to alarm the authorities.

Erik Tegnér, editor-in-chief of the conservative investigative magazine Frontières, has personally experienced this. Physically attacked while on holiday in Brittany with his fiancée during the summer, he now lives under repeated threats from a Moroccan Islamist who has been prosecuted and convicted but released. Interviewed on CNews in the days following Charlie Kirk’s death, he spoke with painfully restrained emotion about the constant danger he faces: “I’ve had to completely change my life, my habits, etc. I find myself in a situation where even my fiancée wants to move away, she’s completely paralysed,” he explained. The police themselves say they are concerned because the Moroccan is only required to report to the authorities once a week. The rest of the time, he is out of their control—ready to stab his target at any moment. At the beginning of October, Tegnér is preparing to publish an explosive, well-documented report on French mayors who are promoting Islamism, which is likely to cause him further trouble.

In the face of this distressing reality, the authorities remain in denial. In an attempt to bring about change, several conservative MPs, members of Identité Libertés (IdL), Marion Maréchal’s party, called on Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau to take action and protect these men and women who are risking their lives because they defend opinions considered heterodox and, as such, punishable by death in the eyes of the Left.

“Damien Rieu [a right-wing commentator] has requested protection from the Home Office, Dora Moutot and Marguerite Stern are under threat, and Erik Tegnér is being threatened by an Islamist who is still at large!” thundered MP Eddy Castermann, spokesman for IdL, on the conservative radio station Radio Courtoisie a few days ago.

To ensure their protection, Eddy Casterman and the two other Identité-Libertés MPs who co-signed the text, Thibaut Monnier and Anne Sicard, are calling for emergency measures. First and foremost: a reassessment of the threat by the Anti-Terrorism Coordination Unit (UCLAT). “Some of the individuals mentioned have already requested protection from the UCLAT. To date, despite being particularly exposed to a risk to their lives, none of them are receiving protection from the sub-directorate for the protection of persons,” the MPs explain.

At a time when the government is looking to make budget savings and is considering removing the police protection still enjoyed by certain ministers who left their official posts long ago, this would be an easy way to reallocate public funds. But for the moment, there is no indication that the threat is being taken seriously. Will someone have to die in France before anything is done?

europeanconservative