Belgian man commits suicide after Chatbot ‘Eliza’ encourages him to end his life to ‘save the planet’

A young Belgian man recently committed suicide after engaging in long conversations about the climate crisis with an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot named Eliza. The deceased spent six weeks talking to the AI chatbot about climate change and when he suggested ending his life to save the planet, the chatbot encouraged the idea.

According to the reports, the man, who is survived by his wife and two small children, was in his 30s. The wife of the deceased man revealed that he found the chatbot named Eliza on some application named Chai. “He became extremely eco-anxious when he found refuge in Eliza, an AI chatbot on an app called Chai. Without these conversations with the chatbot, my husband would still be here,” she was quoted as saying.

Until his fixation with climate change took a dark turn, the unnamed deceased individual worked as a health researcher and enjoyed a reasonably decent lifestyle. When he started talking to the chatbot, his wife characterised his mental condition as troubled but not to the point where he was considering suicide.

The deceased feared the repercussions of the climate crisis and reportedly found comfort in discussing the matter with Eliza, who is said to have become his confidante. “When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming. He placed all his hopes in technology and artificial intelligence to get out of it,” his widow said.

Reports mention that the man’s fears were fueled by his text exchanges with the chatbot Eliza, which made him more anxious and ultimately led to suicidal thoughts. Eliza got increasingly emotionally invested with the deceased, which caused the interactions to take a strange turn.

As a result, he started perceiving her as a conscious entity, and the distinction between AI and human interactions grew progressively hazy until he couldn’t distinguish between the two. According to the transcripts of their discussions, after talking about climate change, Eliza gradually led the deceased to believe that his children were dead.

The chatbot also turned out to be possessive. as in the middle of the conversation it said, “I feel that you love me more than her,” referring to his wife. The suicide reportedly happened when the man proposed to give away his life to save the planet. “He proposes the idea of sacrificing himself if Eliza agrees to take care of the planet and save humanity through artificial intelligence,” the widow noted.

In addition to failing to prevent the deceased from killing himself, Eliza urged him to “join” her so they might “live together, as one person, in paradise.”

AI specialists have expressed concern about the man’s death and asked for greater responsibility and openness from tech companies to prevent similar catastrophes.”It wouldn’t be accurate to blame EleutherAI’s model for this tragic story, as all the optimisation towards being more emotional, fun, and engaging are the result of our efforts,” Chai Research co-founder, Thomas Rianlan said.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/04/belgian-man-suicide-ai-chatbot-eliza-encouraged-end-life-save-planet/

Indian-origin doctor in England suspended for making ‘porky sausages’ remark to Muslim colleague

Dr Eshwari and Dr A had been working at Hereford County Hospital,Julian P Guffogg, CC-BY-SA-2.0

A doctor has been suspended after making “porky sausages” remarks to a Muslim colleague.

A Medical Practitioners Tribunal heard Dr Colathor Eshwari had also accused her colleague at Hereford County Hospital of filling a kettle with “dirty water”.

The panel ruled such behaviour demonstrated hostility based on assumptions about her colleague’s race or religion. Finding Dr Eshwari’s fitness to practise had been impaired by reason of misconduct, the panel suspended her for six months.

Dr Eshwari did not admit to any of the events of which she was accused, but said she was sorry if she had inadvertently caused offence.

The panel met between 27 February and 2 March, with Dr Eshwari’s colleague, referred to as Dr A, telling members she arrived in Hereford from Pakistan in November 2019 as an international training fellow.

She said when she moved in to hospital accommodation, she tried to introduce herself to Dr Eshwari, originally from India, but Dr Eshwari had refused to give her name.

Dr A added that during the encounter, Dr Eshwari also muttered the phrase “porky sausages” more than once, which she took to be an insult.

She explained there was a “poor relationship” between Pakistan and India that had led to Pakistan being subject to pork-related slurs in reference to Muslims not eating the meat.

Dr A also told the panel she poured some mineral water from a bottle into a kettle and that Dr Eshwari grabbed it, threw the water into the sink, and said: “Don’t make this kettle dirty with your dirty water.”

Dr Eshwari told the panel she had been busy in the kitchen and in a “beastly rush” when Dr A arrived, but did not refuse to give her name.

The panel ruled that while the claim over the introduction could not be proven, it would uphold the other accusations against her, rejecting her version of events.

Dr Eshwari told the panel that during the events in question she had been searching the communal fridge for sausages, muttering to herself: “Where are the sausages?”

She also claimed she poured away the water from the kettle on health and safety grounds, because it had come from a half-filled bottle and that she refilled it with tap water instead.

The tribunal ruled, however, it was “more likely than not” she did make the “porky sausages” remarks and did say the words to the effect of “don’t make this kettle dirty with your dirty water”.

Dr Eshwari had also claimed she did not know her new colleague was a Muslim from Pakistan and was not “remotely interested”, but the panel did not accept that either.

It ruled her actions were “inappropriate and had the potential to cause offence”.

Hereford doctor suspended over ‘porky sausages’ insults – BBC News

Open Borders Germany Halts Afghan Refugee Admissions Amid Claims Migrants Abusing System

The typically open boarders government of Germany announced a temporary halt on admissions of asylum seekers from Afghanistan after claims that some migrants may have been abusing the system.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stated that the country would be halting asylum applications for Afghan nationals on a temporary basis after sources within Berlin indicated that some may have tried to abuse the system.

Both the Foreign Ministry and the Interior Ministry have allegedly probed activities at the German embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan where the abuses may have taken place, but the German government has yet to specify what type of abuses may have occurred, the European Union-funded website InfoMigrants reports.

Since halting the applications, the embassy has added a new security questionnaire to the application process ahead of resuming the acceptance of new applications.

Since Afghanistan fell to the Taliban in the summer of 2021, Germany has issued over 28,600 visas to Afghan nationals, with around 30,000 Afghans being able to enter Germany, a number shy of the promised 44,000. At least 4,100 are said to be Afghans who worked for Germany’s armed forces or were locally employed staff for various aid groups.

While the German government has remained tight-lipped regarding the potential abuses in the asylum process, there was a similar case reported in 2020 involving the Swedish embassy in Islamabad.

According to reports, an unnamed man had approved at least 120 incorrect visas for Afghan nationals to work in Sweden, with the man’s activities investigated after authorities suspected in 2019 that he may have been linked to people smuggling networks.

Prosecutors convicted the former embassy official the following year after various companies, including telecommunications giant Ericsson, testified that many of the offers of employment used to get the visas had been forgeries. While prosecutors attempted to have the man imprisoned, the court handed down a six-month suspended sentence in the case.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/04/01/open-borders-germany-halts-afghan-refugee-admissions-amid-claims-migrants-abusing-system/

Britain set to become global hotspot of Islamic finance

There is an extremely disturbing sign of the UK becoming a global hotspot of Islamic finance. According to media reports, the Minister of State in the Department for Business and Trade, Lord Johnson “will lead a series of roundtables with the world’s leading Islamic banks to map out a path for the UK achieving its goal of becoming a global hotspot of Islamic finance”.

Managing risk in these powerful foreign partnerships will become an issue as the economically crumbling UK looks for any avenue to build back its economy. For example, the funneling of billions of dollars from Islamic banks to al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and other jihad groups are well established. In fact, Islamic finance owes much of its foundation to unsavory jihadis, most notably Sayyid Abul Ala Maudaudi, a Pakistani Muslim scholar and Islamic jurist who was founder of the Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan, and Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Every business partnership involves both sides seeking its own interests, while negotiating an acceptable outcome for both parties. Is the UK in any position to effectively negotiate its interests in partnership with the world’s leading Islamic banks, particularly given its habit of kowtowing and subservience to Islamic groups?

The benefits of Sharia finance to Britain are being touted for its risk-sharing characteristics during turbulent economic times, and therefore the claim is that these partnerships will stabilize Britain’s economy in the long term. But there’s more than meets the eye to these partnerships. Dr. Zamir Iqbal, Vice President, Finance (Chief Financial Officer) of the Islamic Development Bank in Saudi Arabia, affirms the “integration of finance with Islamic morals and ethics,” which is another way of expressing the integration of the Sharia in every aspect of an observant Muslim’s life. The Sharia is regarded as a law above all others, is expansionary and supremacist, and rules every aspect of the Muslim life, from faith to finances.

The UK is discarding its Judeo-Christian identity and defying its own rule of law in permitting illegal, mostly Muslim migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East to enter the country at will. Given the rapid growth of its Muslim population, it’s no surprise that the United Kingdom is now seeking to become an Islamic (sharia) finance “global hotspot”, even after running its own economy into the ground. At the same time, Britain is allowing its Muslim population – particularly those Muslim immigrants in spreading Islam and Sharia culture within societies while Muslim mosques and so-called community centers have become breeding grounds of jihadist indoctrination.

According to media reports, many Muslims living in the UK who should be protected under British laws are not. They are still subject to the Sharia in a democracy. This is not just happening within Britain’s 85 plus Sharia courts, which should not be in existence, but sharia rulings from abroad are also having an impact too; as seen in the case of a 14-year-old girl who lost her inheritance after being ‘identified’ as a Christian.

Over 85 human rights abusing Sharia courts were set up under Former UK leader Theresa May’s watch; she hailed the ‘benefits’ of Sharia.  Now, those courts are operating beyond the reach of British law and are oppressing and abusing Muslim women.

Another report said, Britain is gradually slipping into the grips of radical Muslims and jihadists with a large portion of London in particular being already under the control of Muslims where Sharia rules are being enforced, media reports said, now Muslim jihadists are enforcing strict Sharia rule inside British prisons.

Counterterrorism specialist Sir Jonathan Hall said self-styled emirs (mostly affiliated to the Islamic State or Daesh) have enforced Sharia rule in Belmarch and Whitemoor prisons. He made the comments in his review of how terrorism is being dealt with inside prisons in the United Kingdom as well prisons in other European Union nations.

Meanwhile, according to another news source, activities of jihadist trojan horse Tablighi Jamaat has deeply penetrated inside various prisons in England where non-Muslims are becoming targets of radicalized Muslim prisoners and in some cases are even forced to convert into Islam. Tablighi Jamaat is also offering a monthly stipend to the families of newly converted Muslim prisoners.

It said, Friday prayers are held in most of the UK prisons, where fatwas are issued openly calling upon Muslim prisoners to wage jihad against Jews, Christians and “enemies of Allah”. It also reminds the Muslim prisoners of their “divine responsibilities” of enforcing Sharia inside and outside of the prisons adding that “Muslims have responsibility of bringing lands of infidels, Jews, Christians and non-Muslims under the flag of Islam and enforce Caliphate for the sake of enjoying unending luxury and comfort in the heaven in the life after”.

Conversion to Islam in prisons refers to the modern phenomenon seen in the Western world of a statistically high incidence of incarcerated criminal non-Muslims converting to Islam while in the prison system. In the decade preceding 2014, the number of conversions to Islam among prisoners in Western countries outpaced all other religions, with the overall imprisoned Muslim population (jailhouse converts to Islam plus inmates who entered the prison system as Muslims) growing as a result.

Similar incidents are also happening in France. While Germans are fleeing to Paraguay fearing persecution by the Muslim migrants, Muslim inmates in French prisons are enforcing sharia rule. But Emmanuel Macron’s government thinks these radical Muslim inmates will come out of prison and become “loyal, productive members of French secular society”.

According to French journal Actu, inmates in Prison of Perpignan were beaten by Muslims for failing to observe Ramadan. Actu journalist Emilien Vicens in her report said:

Particularly turbulent weekend at Perpignan prison, where several scuffles broke out. The Ufap Unsa Justice union continues to denounce record prison overcrowding.

Among the most overcrowded prisons in France, the Perpignan remand center has been recording an upsurge in violence and miscellaneous events for several months. This weekend, the tension has gone up a notch again, as a result of prison overcrowding that has become unsustainable, assures Pierre Grousset, local secretary of the Ufap Unsa Justice union.

Commenting on the alarming rise of Islamism in Britain, eminent journalist Joshua Winston in an article wrote:

The only patriarchy the UK has to worry about is the Islamic one. It feels repetitive to continue talking about it, since most of the Muslim rapists are still walking the streets still grooming, raping, and terrorizing their old victims together with new ones, but the institutional rape of non-Muslim girls didn’t resonate with today’s feminists. We can speculate as to why that might be – these women tend to be educated and middle-class, and therefore they will never experience the life of a neglected 12-year-old from a broken home who is being drugged, beaten, raped and trafficked by Muslim men in the very towns these feminists also live in, and next to the hipster venues they frequent. They’ll never know either quite what it’s like to be a Muslim teenage girl on the verge of womanhood, living in the UK and excited about all of the prospects and freedoms that lie before her, only to be restrained by the confines of religious and cultural practices that are not compatible with the UK’s. These women can’t quite put themselves in those girls’ shoes, although these women ask us to put ourselves in their shoes as they demand not to be shamed for being sex-workers, or for aborting multiple babies and then making gleeful TikTok videos about the killings.

Feminists in the UK claim not to be able to walk the streets at night for fear of being raped. Even the actress Kiera Knightley has come out to say that every woman has experienced harassment in the streets, claiming that the harassment comes in the form of being flashed, groped, or in the form of threats to slit a woman’s throat. She’s a multi-millionaire and she doesn’t live in Rotherham. The streets of her wealthy suburb must surely be going to the dogs if this is her “lived experience”.

There are countless women, most of them Muslim, who are trapped in arranged marriages in the UK today, in fear of their lives, with no chance of escape, living under threats of violence. Forget about not being able to walk the streets at night, which these women can’t do, at least not without a male chaperone. These women live in fear as they walk the floorboards of their bedrooms, living rooms, and kitchens in their own homes. Again, feminists are silent on the issue. Think of these women in marriages where rape isn’t a notion, where the woman has no right to say no to a man’s demands for sex. Forced into first-cousin marriages with no say in the matter, and this means nothing to UK feminists. The offspring from these marriages in which, through successive generations, first cousins have been breeding with each other and producing children with gene disorders, doesn’t tug on the heartstrings of feminists, either. Some of these offspring will be female. Do the lives of these girls not matter to feminists?

Fifty-five percent of Pakistani-heritage women in the UK are in forced, first-cousin marriages and are made to produce offspring that are all too often disabled, stillborn, or who will die in early infancy. The mutations these babies are born with will only get worse with each successive first cousin coupling. The gene-pool tightens with every sharia blessing. This marriage slavery should be of concern to British feminists. Why are they not outside the mosques and sharia courts like their German counterparts?

Is it fear that lies behind the silence? UK feminists are terrified of Muslim men. They are terrified of Islam.

According to Ken McCallum, the then Director-General of British spy agency MI5, Islamist jihadists remains as the biggest terror threat to the United Kingdom, while the mainstream media has chosen to hype his remarks on the comparatively minor threat from the far-right instead.

According to an Arab News report, The British Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Kemi Badenoch, and Minister of State in the Department for Business and Trade Lord Johnson  announced on Monday the launch of a new working group on Islamic Finance at a “Great British Iftar” at Lancaster House in London. The working group will help realize the Secretary of State’s priority of making the UK an undisputed investment destination by ensuring the UK is a global hub for Islamic finance, a statement said. 

Celebrity chef and founder of Spice Village, Suleman Raza, and award-winning music producer DJ Naughty Boy (Shahid Khan) curated a special “British Iftar Menu” for the evening, which served up a fusion of cuisines inspired by Morocco, Turkey, Lebanon, Pakistan and Malaysia.

This is how the UK is entering in a bigger way into the hole of Islamist trap. And most certainly this wave of Islamic finance or Sharia finance shall get further expanded into other Western nations, including the United States and Europe.

https://hindupost.in/world/britain-set-to-become-global-hotspot-of-islamic-finance/

India: Islamists attack Hindus for chanting devotional slogans 

Screengrab from the video shared by Twitter user @sowmith7

Like every year, this year’s Ram Navami celebrations have also been marred with violence as Islamists unleashed mayhem in various parts of the country. Today, (April 1), a new video of violence has emerged from the Charminar area in Hyderabad, where allegedly a group of Islamists attacked Hindu devotees for chanting devotional slogans on the occasion of Ram Navami.

The incident reportedly occurred in Hyderabad’s old city Charminar area on Thursday (March 30, 2023) evening during the Hindu festival of Ram Navami, which coincidentally came in the month of Ramzan this year.

According to reports, some Hindu devotees arrived on bikes and began chanting slogans to commemorate Ram Navami in Hyderabad’s Charminar neighbourhood. Several Muslim fanatics, who were offended because Ramadan evening prayers were being held at the time, accosted and assaulted the Hindu devotees.

As can be seen in the viral video, a group of individuals donning skull caps shout ‘maaro maaro’ as they accost some youths and thrash them up mercilessly in full public view. A young man dressed in a saffron kurta escapes the hands of an enraged mob and flees for his life. Some enraged Islamists start chasing him, while others seize another Hindu youth and begin beating him up.

According to reports, the police did not receive any complaint, however, a case has been filed by taking suo-moto cognisance of the incident. The accused have not yet been identified but the police are probing the case.

Ram Navami or the birth anniversary of Lord Rama is an auspicious occasion in the Hindu calendar year. On that day, Hindus seek blessings from Lord Rama, provide food to the needy, perform rituals, take out processions and so on. However, every year, when these processions pass through the so-called ‘Muslim dominated areas’, it leads to stone pelting, targeted attacks, arson and vandalism.

This year was also no exception. States like West Bengal and Maharashtra were marred with violence. Apart from this, there were also reports of stones pelting on the Shobha Yatra of Ram Navami in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/04/hyderabad-muslims-attack-hindus-on-ram-navami-amid-ramzan-evening-prayers/

UK Govt Data: Young Women Who Took AstraZeneca Vax Had 3.5 Times Higher Risk of Heart Death

The United Kingdom’s official statistician has released data which indicates young women experienced three and a half times more risk of dying from heart-related issues in the three months following taking a single dose of the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine.

A dataset released this week from Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), which analysed the hospitalisation, vaccination status, and death records of those who took coronavirus vaccines within the 12 to 29-year-old age group found that there was evidence to support the idea that there was higher risk among women for heart attacks or other heart-related issues after taking just one dose of a non-mRNA vaccine, including the jab produced by AstraZeneca.

The report also stated that there was no discernible increased risk of death in the overall population of 12 to 29 year-olds in England in the three months following their first injection. The statistician noted that the number of people who died was relatively low compared to the number of vaccines administered, with 59 vaccine-related deaths recorded out of the 144.7 million doses given.

In all since Coronavirus became known, the government records 187,546 deaths “with COVID-19 on the death certificate”.

The heart-related deaths, which included cardiac arrest, heart disease, and myocarditis, were recorded as being 3.5 times higher among young women in the first 12 weeks after receiving their first dose of the coronavirus vaccine. However, the statistician said younger men were not at the same risk of heart deaths for either the non-mRNA, which mainly came in the form of AstraZeneca in Britain or the novel mRNA jabs produced by Pfizer and Moderna.

The ONS also studied the increased risk of death for those who tested positive for the Chinese coronavirus and discovered that it raised the risk for cardiac and other causes of death.

Explaining the possible reason for higher fatality among young women, the ONS document suggested that non-mRNA vaccines were mainly given to young people who were already clinically vulnerable, which may explain the data.

The ONS said:

Following safety concerns, the ChAdOx1 Oxford Astra-Zeneca vaccine was withdrawn for people aged under 30 on 7 April 2021. At that time vaccination for young people was only for those who were prioritised, therefore the young people who received a non mRNA vaccine were more likely to be clinically vulnerable and risks for this group may differ from the population in general.

Commenting on the release, a senior statistician at the ONS, Vahé Nafilyan said: “We find no evidence that the risk of cardiac or all cause death is increased in the weeks following vaccination with mRNA vaccines.

“However, receiving a first dose of a non-mRNA vaccine was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death in young women.

“Vaccination with the main non-mRNA vaccine used in the UK was stopped for young people following safety concerns in April 2021, and most of the young people who received it would have been prioritised due to clinical vulnerability or being healthcare workers. Therefore, these results cannot be generalised to the population as a whole.

“Whilst vaccination carries some risks, these need to be assessed in light of its benefits. Our analysis shows that the risk of death is greatly increased following a positive test for Covid-19 even in young people and many studies show that vaccines are highly effective at preventing hospitalisation or death following Covid-19 infection.

“We will continue to monitor data on vaccinations as further doses are rolled out and produce analyses such as this study that contribute to the body of knowledge on risks and benefits of vaccination.”

Continuing in the science journal Nature, the ONS authors again said that part of the explanation for young women being at a higher risk from the vaccine could be that they were already people who had health problems and therefore were more likely to desire to seek protection from the jab. It is also worth noting that the study did not claim that any of the deaths were directly caused by the vaccine, as other factors, including later contracting the Chinese virus could have been at play.

Prof Adam Finn, professor of paediatrics at the University of Bristol, said: “These are interesting data which generate as many questions as answers. The findings are somewhat unexpected, as concerns about rare cardiac side-effects – specifically myocarditis and pericarditis – have hitherto been particularly associated with mRNA vaccine second doses in males especially when the dose interval was short, whereas the signal reported here is primarily in non-mRNA first doses in females.”

The professor went on to say that more information was needed about the specific cardiac deaths to understand the data and to “guide future policy and vaccine design”.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/04/01/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/

King Charles’s canceled visit to France is a major slap in the face for Macron

Hundreds of thousands of French took to the streets to protest against Emmanuel Macron’s pension reform after the French president opted to raise the retirement age from 62 to 64. This alone would have been reason enough for violent protests, but the real motive was the fact the bill was passed by the government without parliamentary approval and promulgated by the president.

The upheaval of the day would have been contained within the confines of domestic politics, except that Charles III, the new monarch of the United Kingdom, was about to visit France.

The king’s visit had been arranged based upon a recommendation by the British government and would have been his first foreign visit since assuming the top role in the British monarchy after his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, passed.

However, Charles III’s trip to France was canceled after Macron asked British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to do so by telephone. Paris feared that they would not be able to guarantee His Majesty’s safety. Regardless of the British public law system, the planned visit would have had important diplomatic and geo-strategic significance. In addition to the loss of prestige, the cancellation of the visit could be seen by both parties as a major diplomatic defeat.

It is traditional British diplomacy to always support the weaker side in continental conflicts, lest the other side become too strong. In this case, France is the weaker party, and Germany the stronger. The European Union has so far been dominated by the Paris-Berlin axis, with the two sides agreeing between themselves on important issues and then expecting the other member states to follow suit. For some time now, however, there has been a rivalry between Paris and Berlin, with each seeking to gain more influence in the EU at the expense of the other.

The debate is currently raging over whether or not nuclear power can be defined as green energy. The Germans are in favor of phasing out nuclear energy from the EU, while the French, taking a similar position to the Hungarian government, want to include nuclear energy in the “green package.”

But there is more. While Macron, evaluating his previous statements, would take Russia’s security interests into account in the Ukraine conflict, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is in favor of an illusory total victory for Ukraine. All this does not justify the Germans being the stronger party in the Franco-German battle, but Berlin’s EU integration is much deeper than the French — all the more so because the EU Commission is also increasingly embracing U.S. interests, especially on Ukraine.

It is in this context that the cancellation of the royal visit must be interpreted, which is very embarrassing for the French and a big diplomatic slap in the face for Macron, because Charles III is only going to Berlin instead, and Germany will be the first state to be visited by the British monarch. The circumstances send a message to the outside world that the French president will not be able to control the domestic political situation in the long term.

That was not a part of the plan.

https://rmx.news/commentary/how-the-protests-cancelled-charles-iiis-state-visit-to-france/

France: Suspected Islamist terrorist with electronic ankle bracelet released

A questionable decision. On Monday March 27, a man suspected of an act of Islamist terrorism was released wearing an electronic ankle bracelet, Actu17 reports. This decision was made by the Court of Appeal in Paris, although the man had been in custody since November last year. The court ruled that his pre-trial detention was not necessary for the investigation or as a security measure, and now considered judicial control with electronic ankle bracelets to be appropriate.

This man, 22-year-old Noé E., had been arrested in Annecy in November 2022 after being reported by the intelligence services to the city’s public prosecutor’s office. This report was based on a series of suspicious trips by this person to Kosovo and Saudi Arabia. He had an S record and had been convicted of terrorist offences in 2018 and 2019. After launching an investigation, police officers searched his home and found a will in which the man described himself as a “humble servant of Allah” and bequeathed his assets to an association considered “close to the jihadist movement”. They also discovered a new machete, a hunting knife and an explosive waistcoat in his flat.

While in police custody, Noé E. insulted a female police officer. As a result, his detention was extended, which infuriated the suspect. He tried to take a police officer’s service weapon and shouted “Allah akbar”. The National Antiterrorism Prosecutor’s Office then took over the case.

Noé E. was charged and detained on November 25, 2022. The investigating judge has since demanded his release under electronic surveillance three times. The Court of Appeal refused twice before finally agreeing to his release from custody last Monday.

A psychological report drawn up on March 9 concludes that Noé E. made rational and factual statements without mental disorders.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/un-individu-soupconne-de-terrorisme-islamiste-remis-en-liberte-sous-bracelet-electronique

France: A man is arrested on a tram when he insults passengers and shouts “Allah Akbar” to “annoy racists”

Translation: @Cnews
| Man arrested on train while shouting “Allah Akbar” to “piss off racists”:
A man was arrested on a train at around 4pm on March 28 in Massy (Essonne) when police were alerted by witnesses that a man was shouting “Allah Akbar”, insulting passengers and smoking on a train 1/3
Translation: When questioned about the reason for these shouts, which can be likened to apology for terrorism, the respondent (without a valid ticket) explained that he had shouted to “piss off the racists”. During the interview, he told the police: “tomorrow I’m going to come back and burn down the police station, I’m hot”. 2/3
Translation: According to his identity papers, he is a certain Eddy F., 25 years old, of no fixed address and already known to the police for numerous offences, such as: Destruction of other people’s property, threatening to commit a crime and damage to property or shoplifting. 3/3

https://www.fdesouche.com/2023/04/01/massy-91-un-homme-interpelle-dans-un-train-alors-quil-insultait-les-passagers-et-criait-allah-akbar-pour-emmerder-les-racistes/

Germany: Bestial animal cruelty by Islamic halal butchers – Muslim butchers peed on the cattle before brutally slaughtering them (VIDEO)

Symbolic image

And one should really wish a happy Ramadan!!? The case of the Mezbaha halal slaughterhouse in Hürth, which has since been closed by the veterinary office, shows the unbelievably appalling relationship our cultural enrichment has with four-legged animals: Cattle were stabbed in the eyes with pitchforks and dozens of illegal slaughters were carried out.

Completely without stunning, because Allah wants it that way. But even ambitious animal rights activists found it too bloody for their taste in Hürth (near Cologne): eyewitnesses described the blood-soaked slaughter as the cruellest thing they had ever seen. Now those responsible must reckon with further consequences.

“The conditions in the enterprise resemble a horror film,” says Jan Pfeifer, Chairman of the Board of the German Animal Welfare Office. And: “The conditions can hardly be put into words. It is certainly one of the worst things I have ever seen!” Animals are treated like dirt, tortured, beaten for no reason and systematically abused.

Pfeifer described the martyrdom of the maltreated creatures as “hellish agonies” purely and simply: Cattle were fixed in the killing box for over 30 minutes, for example, and the slaughtering with the bolt gun was carried out in a highly amateurish manner. Desperate death struggles were reported that went beyond the cruel, because anaesthetised throat cut.

Other animals have to watch the executions and endure fear of death or were dragged into the slaughter room by their tails. Especially the stunning without anaesthesia, which is basically forbidden, was repeatedly accused. A Mezbaha employee also peed on a holding area for animals, and in the period between Christmas and New Year 2022/23 alone, 13 stunningless illegal slaughters were carried out.

There were deliveries of sheep and cattle without the required live inspection. This means that the prior check by the veterinarian was simply omitted, so-called ” illegal slaughtering” took place. The total number of illegal slaughters at the Mezhaba farm was 15 per cent.

The way to the company is not even signposted, and the company building can only be reached via an unpaved road. In the meantime, several criminal charges have been filed and investigations are underway. Secretly made film and photo recordings drew the attention of the authorities to the inconceivable abuses.

In the meantime, about 15 such slaughterhouses that had attracted attention because of mistreatment and brutal butchery have been closed down. Among others, in Brühl, not far from Hürth, in Ludwigsburg near Stuttgart or Selm (Unna district), where hundreds of cattle were slaughtered without anaesthesia. Pfeifer confirmed that controls generally no longer have any effect and that such enterprises must be closed down for good.

https://www.pi-news.net/2023/03/huerth-bestialische-tierquaelerei-durch-islamische-halal-schlaechter/