Month: April 2023

At the age of 14, Rashad A.’s criminal record already looks horrific. Now the police and the public prosecutor’s office in Wuppertal have caught him. At the age of 13, he is said to have committed eight violent acts. The young Syrian is alleged to have committed robbery, assault and even rape. Rashad A. is also alleged to have been involved in at least one assault on a prostitute.

Senior public prosecutor Wolf-Tilman Baumert explained: “There had already been an accumulation of violent offences in Wuppertal for months.” The public prosecutor’s office has determined that the 14-year-old is responsible for a large number of these offences.

Among the charges are three specific cases:

On March 2, Rashad A. hired two children to get the tenant of a petrol station to open his shop. The 14-year-old then robbed the shop with an accomplice. Rashad A. was caught but initially released.
On April 4, the boy brutally beat a man. The victim only knew how to help himself by jumping into the river Wupper and suffered hypothermia in the process.
On April 13, Rashad A. allegedly put a cigarette out on a victim’s hand.
After the public prosecutor’s office now applied for the arrest warrant, the boy was caught a few hours later on the grounds of the Easter fair at Carnaper Square in Wuppertal.

The alleged offences committed by Rashad A. before his 14th birthday as a minor are also taken into account in the arrest warrant, as there is a risk of repetition. An investigator told the newspaper Bild: “His propensity for violence was so high that we had to worry that it could become even more dangerous for victims. It is good that the young man is now in custody.”

Investigators are now also looking into whether Rashad A. is really only 14 years old. His height of 6.3 ft makes the investigators wonder. An expert opinion is now to clarify his age. If he is older, he would have to answer for earlier offences.

In case of a conviction, the suspected intensive offender, who arrived in Germany from Syria with his parents as a child, would face a severe juvenile sentence. If his victims also take civil action against him, he faces high payments for damages and pain and suffering. Senior public prosecutor Baumert explains: “Under 14, you are not of age to commit a crime, but under civil law it is different: You can be prosecuted from the age of 7.”

https://www.focus.de/panorama/vergewaltigung-gewalt-ueberfaelle-14-jaehriger-in-u-haft-polizei-fasst-gefaehrlichen-jugendlichen_id_191786192.html

By Thomas Lifson

Knocking 6 billion dollars off the market value of one’s employer normally would result in heads rolling.  The inevitable has just happened at the Anheuser-Busch subsidiary of InBev, the global brewing giant. AdAge has reported in a paywalled article that Alissa Heinerscheid, Bud Light’s VP of marketing has “taken a leave of absence.” The UK Daily Mail has a lengthy article on the subject with no paywall.

To be sure, this is not quite the same as being fired and carrying your personal belongings out of the office in a box, but I have a hard time imagining that Ms. Heinerscheid will ever again be entrusted with guiding a major beer to its customers. As the very first female to head marketing for what is claimed to be the world’s biggest beer brand, certain niceties must be observed by Anheuser-Busch in her defenestration.

No visible cruelty; in fact, quite the opposite. When she leaves for another job, perhaps a brand that is marketed predominantly to upscale women (a market segment she obviously understands better than beer drinkers), I have little doubt that her vision, courage, and fortitude (or similar vague positive qualities) will be mentioned. Nobody gains by piling on a cancer survivor mother of 3 who made one mistake.

The exact nature of that mistake is what makes this incident so fascinating and meaningful. I believe that the political ramifications are profound.

The first point to make is that nobody at Bud Light or A-B had a clue that many of their customers would take exception to transsexual “influencer” Dylan Mulvaney getting his picture on cans of Bud Light and serving as a marketing agent.  The company points out that only a few cans were produced and sent as a gift to Mulvaney, but as soon as pictures were available online of Delaney with his visage reproduced on a product that males place in their mouths and swallow, a homosexual connotation became attached to the product in the minds of many males who drink beer.

It is not at all clear who signed-up Mulvaney. It might have been VP Heinerscheid, but given that the company says it has “hundreds” of influencers, it is possible that one of her staff came up with the concept, in which case she probably signed off on the idea, perhaps without giving much thought to any adverse consequences.

Marketing is a discipline that uses a lot of research, normally, which makes the failure to understand the psychology of large numbers of Bud Light drinkers so curious. I can only assume that in her daily life she associates with her peers: highly educated, affluent professionals, many of them from Ivy League schools, none of whom would ever dream of saying anything negative about transsexuality. No blinking red light appeared in her mind to caution that not everyone approves of the trans movement, and that the trans extremists who bully and physically attack campus speakers like Riley Gaines, who insist on biological males showering with teenage girl athletes, and who have caused mass shootings, might have caused a powerful counterreaction.

The reality is that the ruling class in the United States is so full of contempt for what they regard as the lower orders of society that they feel no moral imperative to try to understand them. The proper reaction is to “transphobia” is contempt, because, after all, such retrograde views are “on the wrong side of history” and soon will be extinguished, just as resistance to homosexual marriage has vanished from the public sphere.

Ivy League marketing gurus are not the only ones carrying this view. Most of the Democrat party shares it, or at least will not speak up in opposition to it out of fear of the trans lobby. This is, I believe, the Achilles Heel of the Democrats going into the 2024 election. A large plurality if not an outright majority of voters are increasingly uncomfortable with the demands of the trans movement. They don’t want their daughters pushed out of athletics and forced to share bathrooms with biological males. The see a Supreme Court Justice who stated in her confirmation hearing that she can’t define what a woman is. And they see the stridency, bullying, and outright violence being used to force changes on everyone else, they get angry.

There are a few signs that some Dems are starting to catch on. John Hinderaker of Powerline recounted yesterday how Minnesota State Legislators took pains to keep their enthusdiastic support hidden from voters when they passed a radical bill authorizing the state to allow sexual mutilation of minors from other states without their parents’ knowledge, and how the state’s corrupt media cooperated by blacking out news of the measure:

In the Senate earlier today, Democrats were warned that cheering and emotional demonstrations would be out of order as the “carve ’em up” bill was being voted on. So they waited until the tally was done before breaking into shouts and cheers of joy at the prospect of out-of-state children being mutilated in Minnesota, contrary to the wishes of their parents. But the Senate’s official feed went dark, so that the disgusting display was invisible to whatever handful of viewers had tuned in to the proceedings.

Trans issues have the potential to bring many new voters to the GOP in 2024. This includes the highly prized suburban soccer mom demographic, as well as males who had not previously bothered registering to vote, but who resent being forced to accept a mental illness as perfectly normal and treat people as if they were the opposite of their natural sex.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/04/decoding_the_bud_light_disaster_as_marketing_vp_alissa_heinerscheid_takes_leave_of_absence_.html

‘Jupiterian’ French President Emmanuel Macron is less popular than ever before with the general public, polling has revealed.

The general French public no longer like President Emmanuel Macron, polling has revealed, with nearly three-quarters of French having a bad opinion of the country’s head of state.

Such a figure represents an all-time low for the Jupitarian leader, with his poor handling of the country’s pension reforms eclipsing the anger seen during the Yellow Vest protests as well as France’s COVID passport phase.

According to figures obtained for the RTL broadcaster, only around 26 per cent now have a favourable view of Macron, a significant drop on the 46 per cent who held such a position this time last year.

Meanwhile, a massive 41 per cent of the country’s population have a “very bad” opinion of the President, with a further 32 per cent of people describing themselves as having a “rather bad” view of the neoliberal leader.

Perhaps the worst statistic for Macron is that 63 per cent of those in the country want the ongoing protests against the country’s government — many of which devolve into riots — to continue, suggesting that France’s commander-in-chief will be forced to deal with on-and-off strikes and public unrest for some time longer.

While Macron has been in tough spots before, Friday’s figures betray a level of unsteadiness within the Macron administration that has not been seen before, with the government’s main political rival, Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National, seeing their support surge in the polls as disorder creeps into the country.

By contrast, the President is being met with significant protests wherever he goes, with police now resorting to confiscating saucepans from possible protesters for fear they will use them to noisily disrupt public appearances of the French leader.

So far, Macron does not appear to be looking at an early election, with most respondents to the RTL survey expecting his Presidency to survive the crisis.

None of this is taking into account the head-of-state’s big mouth however, with Macron having a habit of enraging members of the general public seemingly without reason when asked about challenges facing him.

Having previously declared he wanted to “piss off” the unvaccinated by preventing them from availing of public facilities during COVID, Macron has more recently mocked those protesting him, claiming they lacked legitimacy while mocking their attempts to disrupt his stately visits to parts of France this month.

This approach has won him no favours within his own government, with some members of his inner circle going rogue and hosting negotiations with opponents in a desperate attempt to reduce tensions.

None of these unsanctioned peace missions have so far succeeded however, with the current administration remaining at odds with the French public.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/04/22/le-screw-up-emmanuel-macron-popularity-sinks-to-record-low/

The building in Bourbon-Lancy now appears like an empty shell ready to receive its new cladding for its new function: to house the centre for social and cultural activities. However, on the façade in the Rue des Enclos leading to the community centre, there are two elements that date back to the building’s original use and are the source of much discussion.

First of all, there is the statue of Saint-Louis placed in its niche and the cross that surmounts it on the ridge of the building.

The Cercle Saint-Louis, before becoming a venue, was originally a private school. Some former Bourbons remember attending it in their younger years. However, in order to comply with the charter of secularism, which allows it to receive subsidies, the municipality was forced to decide to remove these two elements.

Opposition politician Marcel Stanio was angry about this. In his opinion, the statue was part of the history of the building.

The mayor, Édith Gueugneau, justified the decision: “It is the French authority CAF that demands this and I cannot do without a subsidy of €400,000.” It was therefore unanimously decided to remove the statue and cross and donate it to the parish of Saint-Jean l’Évangéliste. It is to be placed in the courtyard of the parish hall. […] Le Journal de Saône-et-Loire

https://www.fdesouche.com/2023/04/22/bourbon-lancy-71-afin-doctroyer-une-subvention-pour-rehabiliter-un-batiment-la-caf-exige-le-retrait-dune-statue-de-saint-louis-et-dune-croix-pourtant-historiquement-presentes/

Allahu akbar!” Noisy Muslim Friday prayer with muezzin roar on April 21, 2023 in the street Lingnerallee in Dresden. Quote Angela Merkel (2015): “I don’t see any Islamisation.” starting at 0:29 min

https://www.politikversagen.net/allahu-akbar-in-dresden

Cleopatra was Greek. Basic historic fact. But we live in an exciting era where actual history has been turned over to be rewritten by the wokes who think that Black Panther’s Wakanda and the 1619 Project are actual history.

So when Netflix decided to cast Gal Gadot, who’s Israeli and thus Mediterranean and at least has some relationship to the role, the BLM crowd protested and she was recast as black. Because everyone who has watched 70s blaxploitation movies knows that Cleopatra was black.

Egyptian Arabs are none too happy with the idea. How unhappy? Really, really unhappy.

An Egyptian lawyer has filed a lawsuit against streaming giant Netflix for depicting Pharoh Cleopatra as a Black woman in a new documentary.

Lawyer Mahmoud al-Semary filed the lawsuit with a public prosecutor with the intention of having Netflix banned in Egypt for what he claimed was a distortion of history.

Al-Semary claimed that the Netflix documentary distorts Egypt’s history in favor of promoting Afrocentrism. He also complained of warped standards, stating in the lawsuit that “most of what Netflix platform displays do not conform to Islamic and societal values and principles, especially Egyptian ones.”

Not knowing the Egyptian legal system, I couldn’t tell you if he has a case, but there has been plenty of outrage in Egypt where this is a longstanding issue.

Egypt’s Arab Muslims have used their physical ownership to claim that they are the successors of the ancient civilization that their ancestors invaded and occupied. But black nationalists invented an imaginary past in which they were the rulers of Egypt and had advanced technology that was stolen by the Greeks and the Romans. (This isn’t some crank idea limited to NBA players, you’ll find that to be a popular belief even outside the Nation of Islam.)

Netflix, as a company run by California wokes, is obviously far more interested in pandering to the black nationalist who now dominate the Democrats than in caring what Egyptian Arab Muslims think. And it decided to step into the middle of an ongoing battle. That’s not new. Woke universities began trying to invent fictional renderings of dead Egyptian pharaohs that made them look African. Egyptians responded by banning them from having access to the original artifacts. So this is just the latest shot fired in the mummy wars.

Jada Pinkett Smith, the American actress who was executive producer and narrator, was meanwhile quoted as saying: “We don’t often get to see or hear stories about black queens, and that was really important for me, as well as for my daughter, and just for my community to be able to know those stories because there are tons of them!”

Egyptian Arabs feel the same way.

Everyone can’t have their own Cleopatra. Or can they? Just make a dozen versions with every possible race or ethnicity.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/black-nationalists-fight-arab-muslims-over-cleopatra/

Anglo-American influencer, kickboxer and online sex business owner Andrew Tate who was arrested in December 2022 on suspicion of human trafficking, rape and forming an organized crime group only acted to further his notoriety has been released from custody into house arrest in Romania.

Last year, Andrew Tate sparked severe controversy through a TikTok video that promoted male dominance, female submission and wealth. It garnered up to 11.6 billion views. Infamous to be the most googled man in 2022 Tate’s first communications show a rhetorical shift as he now signals to two distinct pools of fans.

In an October 24, 2022, post on his Gettr account, Tate announced that he converted to Islam, writing: “This is why I’m Muslim. Any Christian who believes in good and understands the true battle against evil must convert. ‘So be patient, Indeed the promise of Allah is TRUTH’. Quran 30:60”. The post included a video purportedly showing a transgender Methodist minister preaching at a church service.

Holding on to his red pill, blue p*ill incels (involuntary celibates), Tate tells them they are not free and “living in the matrix”. But he also signals to another fan base with the proclamation: “We must defeat Shaytan” [the Islamic version of Satan].

In October 2022, in a TikTok video Andrew Tate said in a now-deleted viral TikTok video that “ISIS are the real Muslims because ISIS do exactly what the book says. Kill everyone who’s not a Muslim and chop people’s heads off and set them on fire and be fucking raging lunatics. But all the other Muslims go: ‘they’re not real Muslims because I read the book and ignore those parts.’ Well then, you’re not fucking Muslim, because you’re ignoring the fucking book”.

This TikTok video was shared on October 25, 2022 by a pro-ISIS media outlet, Bariqah News Agency on Telegram, which praised Andrew Tate for his statements. Later, on October 29, Tate discussed his conversion and beliefs in an October 29 podcast with British Muslim podcaster Mohammad Hijab, saying that elites in Western cultures promote feminism so that women are forced to work outside the home while their children are indoctrinated through schools, the internet, and “the matrix”.

While sharing Andrew Tate’s video, Bariqah News Agency said:

“Andrew Tate – 99.99% of the world’s women hate him because he is against feminists and says that a woman’s place is in the home, and that she should obey the man. [Then] Andrew Tate announces his conversion to Islam [and] there was a massive influx of tweets by women affiliated with Islam who cursed him, including some who announced they would leave Islam because Tate joined… Good, let them be replaced… No, we have in the video clip above Andrew Tate before his conversion to Islam acknowledging that the men of the Islamic State are the real Muslims and no one besides them, because they adhere to the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunna literally, while those who read the Qur’an and disregard its teachings are not really Muslims”.

Andrew Tate discussed his conversion, views, and beliefs in an October 29, 2022 podcast with British Muslim podcaster Mohammad Hijab. Tate said that Islam reflects his beliefs about personal standards and self-reliance, and explained how Islamic theology is consistent with his belief in a strong and fear-inspiring God. Tate said that feminism has been used to sneak “insanity” into people’s minds and to convince women to avoid having kids and to not respect their husbands.

Mohammad Hijab interjected that feminism is dangerous and serves the economic interests of elites in the West, and Tate agreed, adding that the elites are scared of him because he can make them lose money and interfere with their influence. He elaborated that in modern society, currencies are inflated and both parents are forced to work in order to prevent women from sharing their husbands’ worldviews and in order to enable schools, the internet, and “the matrix” shape the future by controlling youth.

It may be mentioned here that Mohammed Hijab is known for his controversial remarks, including declaring “We love death” at a pro-Palestine rally and making threats against Hindus in Leicester.

As researchers turned to the challenge of incel and its potential for violence, Andrew Tate moved into a new scene – the toxic masculine Islamist scene, creating the potential for an incel-Islamist radical cross over, opposition to which becomes even more challenging and complex.

Following his conversion to Islam has been peppered with a toxic masculine Islamism, characterized by an obsession with the male physique, a desire to rule over women and undermine values of tolerance and equality. His choice of Islamic mentors highlights the extreme path he is on. He can be seen learning from none other than Mohammed Hijab, known for his controversial remarks, including declaring “We love death” at a pro-Palestine rally and making threats against Hindus in Leicester.

The online Islamist right is united by a shared conviction that a natural order of society, one in which authority is derived from patriarchal force, has been disrupted and replaced in the west by the political and economic autonomy of women, feminism, and the LGBT movement. Maria Akbar writes for the controversial news platform 5 Pillars on how Andrew Tate’s views chime with her take on Islam. She feels that “there has been an emasculation of men with the advent of feminism…I view a feminist as a woman who is bold and angry, demanding her rights be given to her. Almost like a baby whose toys have been thrown out of its pram. But far less cute”.

Andrew Tate had been enthusiastically received by like-minded misogynists, such as Dilly Hussain, co-founder of 5 Pillars, due to their shared anti-Western stance, approach to women and disdain for LGBT rights. 

Dilly Hussain regularly praises Tate’s work and recently lamented that he could not host him on his podcast, due to Tate’s detention. The opinions around his arrest seemingly center around forgiveness, some even denial.

Of considerable concern is the way in which Andrew Tate can be used by Islamists to increase their reach. During a podcast appearance with Mohammed Hijab, Tate made several worrying statements regarding the role of women in society, including suggesting that a husband is responsible for protecting and providing for his wife during marriage, and that a woman should bear “personal responsibility” in cases of sexual assault. The episode has gained 2.3 million views since it was uploaded to Hijab’s YouTube channel in October 2022. The greater access this gives Islamists to young men, who are seeking Andrew Tate because they are aggrieved and searching for meaning and value, provides new challenges to counter-extremism practitioners tasked with tackling avenues of radicalization.

A variety of reasons have been posited for Tate’s decision to identify as Muslim: extending his fan base, a genuine search for God, or yet another anti-establishment publicity stunt. Whatever the purpose, his adherence to the ideology of figures like Mohammed Hijab and Dilly Hussain paints a negative image of Islam. It has the potential to fuel anti-Muslim sentiment among those who oppose Andrew Tate, whilst also the potential to draw Tate’s followers from the extreme incel ideology to an Islamist and jihadist ideology that extends hate beyond women and LGBTQ+ and aims to impose that thinking on others.

But most importantly, in addition to preaching radical Islam, individuals like Andrew Tate are using their massive followers on social media in spreading a dangerous rhetoric telling British youth that men are owed a certain type of life that Western liberal society bars them from. And it tells these young men that they should embrace aggressive masculinity and if they do so, they deserve an obedient wife. In other words, individuals like Tate are directly challenging rights of women in the West.

https://hindupost.in/world/andrew-tate-a-toxic-british-american-islamist-influencer/

Until we gather the nerve to push back against militant transsexuals, they will bully their way into all areas intended for women. In the UK, Shanu Varma has joined the Women’s Institute.

Move over, Fallon Fox. Varma says he is “a gold medal holder shao’lin kung fu champion,” has “permanently paralysed nine people from the neck down,” is “very violent and cruel,” and has “never lost in 320 fights in 40 years.”

Snarls Varma,

“Be careful who you threaten, I can make one phone call, call a favour in and end of troll.”

Varma announced on social media that he has been working on “a snuff list” of feminists to kill for resisting transsexualism. Negative feedback was turned over to the Greater Manchester Police so that the transphobes responsible could be punished.

Women’s Institute chief executive Melissa Green told The Guardian: ‘For us, transgender women are women and we want to share and celebrate their experience with them.’

Good for you, Melissa. No doubt the crocodiles will eat you last.

You can’t blame people for being afraid of transsexuals. Those who believe themselves to be members of the opposite sex are psychotic by definition. They are characterized by such intense self-hatred that according to the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 82% consider killing themselves and 40% actually try. Many of them sever parts of their own bodies in a desperate attempt to obliterate their identity. When this self-hatred is projected outward, unimpeded by morality, the results are horrifying, as the ongoing wave of transsexual mass murderersattests.

However, sometimes fear needs to be overcome — if only for the sake of our long-term safety.

#Bekind 🙄

“A transgender activist who claimed she was drawing up a kill list of 'Nazi' opponents says she has just joined the Women's Institute.

Shanu Varma, has described herself as 'violent and cruel' and purports to be a martial arts champion” https://t.co/nKqBJA7A6B

— Comrade StandingWithWomen (@RealWorlding) April 20, 2023

https://twitter.com/RealWorlding/status/1648928879594074113

Residents fear for the future of their community, with many stating that “the Great Replacement is a very real concern” and that the area is no longer the same city it was 30 years ago.

An illegal makeshift mosque in the suburb of Champigny, Paris, has caused widespread controversy and frustration among local residents. Numerous reports from residents express feeling overwhelmed, inconvenienced, and concerned for their safety due to the increased noise levels and the influx of worshippers from the illegal mosque. The mosque was established during Ramadan as the existing three mosques in Champigny could not accommodate the large number of Muslims.

Residents of Champigny have been living in the area for many years and have noticed a significant change in their community. According to one resident, the area was once a nice place to live, but the situation has become unbearable in recent years due to the influx of migrants, who are primarily Islamic.

The ReconquÍte Party, a conservative political party in France founded in 2021 by former Presidential candidate Eric Zemmour, was contacted by the residents who expressed their concerns and frustrations about the situation. A spokesperson for the party, Stèphanie, spoke to residents about the issues that the residents were facing, including the inappropriate recitation of evening prayers and the influx of Muslims.

The situation has become so contentious that local media sent reporters to the area to document residents’ concerns. One such reporter visited the area to gather testimonies from residents exasperated by the situation.

“I can’t sleep at night,” said one resident, who wished to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation. “The noise from the mosque is too much. I have to work in the morning, but I can’t get any rest because of the loud prayers and chanting that goes on all night.”

Many residents have even reported feeling unsafe, with one admitting that he no longer leaves his home without his dogs due to the fear of being attacked again.

Other residents have expressed frustration with the parking situation in the area. “There are cars everywhere,” said another resident. “It’s impossible to find a parking spot. I have to park several blocks away and walk to my apartment, which is especially difficult when I come home from work during the early morning hours.”

Some residents have even reported feeling unsafe in their own neighborhoods. “I’ve seen people loitering around the mosque late at night,” said another resident. “I don’t know what they’re doing, but it makes me nervous. I’ve lived in this area for years and never felt so uncomfortable in my neighborhood.”

The situation has led some residents to conclude that Champigny has become a “lost territory of the Republic.” According to one resident, the area is no longer the same city it was 30 years ago, and the Great Replacement, a term used to describe the colonization of Western Europe by immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East, is a very real concern.

For years, Eric Zemmour has warned the French that “they are being expropriated from their country.” France is the most Islamic nation in Europe, with 8.8% of its population now being Muslim. Pew Research Center predicts the Muslim population will rise to 8.6 million or 12.7 percent of the country in 2050. According to Gatestone, Islam is the second-largest religion in France but comes first if one counts active practitioners. 

The establishment of an illegal mosque in Champigny has brought to the forefront the issue of the Islamic community in France, many of whom are migrants, disregarding the country’s laws. Residents are deeply frustrated with the town hall’s lack of action in addressing the situation and the fact that police intervention requires authorization from the mayor, who is hesitant to take action against the illegal and disruptive Islamic ritual occurring in public spaces during inappropriate hours. This has only fueled the tension between the community and the authorities, leaving residents feeling unheard and unsafe.

https://rairfoundation.com/islamized-france-controversy-erupts-as-illegal-mosque-causes-chaos-and-violence-in-paris-suburb-video/ / https://vladtepesblog.com/