Four refugees rape two 13 year old German girls

Borsigplaz square in Dortmund, Lucas Kaufmann, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

The girl (aged 13) suffered a nightmare in July: according to the indictment, two youths raped the child in a flat – the next day, one of the criminals and a friend attacked her again!

Since Wednesday, three Syrians and a Guinean have been on trial in Dortmund for sexual abuse.

The victim and his girlfriend had met the Syrians on July 10 in a house near the square Borsigplatz. Ahmod A. (18), according to the allegations, touched one of the girls (13) indecently in the kitchen. Meanwhile, his buddy Rageb A. (17) had gone into the bedroom with the other girl (also 13).

He violently broke down her resistance and raped the girl several times. Afterwards, Khaled S. (20) abused the schoolgirl on the bed, according to the investigation.

When the two girls met the Syrians again the next day in the flat of the asylum seeker Mamadou B. (18), Rageb A. allegedly abused the 13-year-old again before the owner of the flat attacked her.

“Everyone knew that the injured party was only 13 years old,” said the prosecutor.

The German girl has been in psychological treatment since then. The accused face prison sentences of several years.

https://www.bild.de/regional/ruhrgebiet/ruhrgebiet-aktuell/prozess-gegen-vier-freunde-vergewaltigte-er-mehrfach-eine-13-jaehrige-82525632.bild.html?t_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.bild.de%2F

Cardinal Pell called Francis’s pontificate a ‘catastrophe’ in memo 

Pope Francis met in October 2020 with Cardinal George Pell  (Vatican Media)

Italian journalist Sandro Magister has said that late Australian Cardinal George Pell was the author of an anonymous memo he published on his blog last year that called Pope Francis’s pontificate was a “catastrophe”.
    The prefect emeritus of the Secretariat for the Economy, who spent over a year in jail in his homeland before being cleared of sexual abuse charges in 2020, died in Rome last week following heart complications that arose after a hip operation.
    The memo said a wide range of commentators considered “this pontificate is a disaster in many or most respects; a catastrophe”. 

https://www.ansa.it/english/news/2023/01/13/pell-called-franciss-pontificate-a-catastrophe-reporter_86a78d7c-ef6c-4f5b-a3ec-8482abca4400.html

India: High Court judgment allowing marriage of minor girls under Muslim personal law will not be precedent in other cases

Supreme Court bench comprising of CJI Chandrachud heard the case. Image Source: OpIndia File Photo

On Friday, 13th January 2023, the Supreme Court ruled that the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision in the case Javed v. State of Haryana and Others, which concluded that a Muslim girl aged 16 years can engage in a legal and legitimate marriage under Muslim Personal Law, should not be used as a precedent in any subsequent instances.

This interim order was issued by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha while issuing notice in a special leave petition filed by the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights challenging the HC judgment on the grounds that it violates the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, which prescribes the age for sexual consent as 18 years. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, standing for the NCPCR, voiced issues about utilizing personal law as a defence for offences under POCSO.

SG Tushar Mehta submitted, “Girls who are 14,15,16 are getting married. Can there be a defence of personal law? Can you plead custom or personal law for a criminal offence? We are on the question if the marriage will be valid at all in the face of criminal law existing and the POCSO Act.”

CJI Chandrachud agreed to send a notice in the matter and file it with other similar petitions filed by the NCPCR against other High Court judgments holding the same position. In the meanwhile, the SG asked the bench to delay the ruling. However, if the HC verdict is stayed, the girl may be repatriated to her parents against her will, according to CJI Chandrachud.

CJI Chandrachud said, “Her parents wanted her to marry her maternal uncle. What will happen is, the moment we stay she will be restored to her parents, which she does not.”

SG Tushar Mehta pointed out that several such orders are being passed by various high courts in different cases. To this, CJI Chandrachud said, “We’ll issue notice to decide upon the question of law and say that the judgment may not be used as precedent.”

The bench noted in the order while giving notice on the NCPCR plea, “Pending further orders, impugned judgment shall not be relied upon as precedent.”

It should be noted that the Kerala High Court has declared that marriage under Muslim personal law is not exempt from the POCSO Act and that if one of the parties to such a marriage is a juvenile, the criminal offence under POCSO would be attracted, regardless of the legitimacy of the marriage under the personal law. Karnakata High Court had also ruled that POCSO Act overrides Personal Law as it is a special act, and therefore the marriage of minor Muslim girls is invalid even if it is allowed under the personal law.

On the other hand, some other high courts have ruled that the marriage of Muslim girls after attaining puberty is valid as per Muslim personal law. Apart from Punjab and Haryana High Court, Delhi High Court and Jharkhand High Court had cited the Sharia law to rule that Muslim girls can marry after attaining 15 years of age, as it is the ‘Marriageable Age’ under Islamic Sharia Law. The high courts had said that  a Muslim girl who has attained 15 years of age or has attained puberty is free to marry anyone as per the Muslim Personal Law.

On the other hand, Punjab and Haryana High Court had ruled that a Muslim girl above the age of 16 years is competent to marry any person of her choice.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/01/hc-order-allowing-marriage-of-minor-muslim-girls-not-precedent-sc/

Who designed global guidelines for puberty blockers?

Trans Rights Protest In London,screen grab youtube

Clinics around the world follow guidelines from the Netherlands for gender treatments in children. The basis for this is, among other things, a much-criticized study sponsored by a German hormone manufacturer.

More and more children and young people believe they have to question their gender identity. Some 60 minors were treated in the Netherlands in 2010, but has increased to around 1 600 last year. Another 1 800 people under the age of 18 were on the waiting list because gender clinics in the country are full.

Institutions around the world use a standard procedure developed in Amsterdam in the 1990s when it comes to the drug treatment of supposedly transsexual children.

A report by the Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad has meanwhile cast doubt on the directive and the independence of gender research at the Amsterdam UMC hospital. As strict as the conditions for treatment may appear, several complications have been overlooked: The terrible side effects of the heavy drug has been brushed off by doctors as being the lesser evil.

Hormone manufacturer sponsored ‘puberty blocker’ study

The approach with puberty inhibitors has since been known internationally as the “Dutch protocol”. The protocol has become the basis for the “gender-affirming standard of care” used throughout the world. Tens of thousands of children are affected worldwide, and in the Netherlands certainly several hundreds, although no precise figures are available.

Scientists investigated whether hormone treatment in transsexuals is more successful if their puberty was initially suppressed with medication. The sponsor of the study was the German hormone manufacturer.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals, the company that markets the drug Triptorelin as a puberty inhibitor had a strong commercial interest in the outcome. Primarily, treatment relies on administering hormones from the opposite sex: men are given oestrogen to become more feminine, women testosterone to become more masculine. But teenagers are additionally administered puberty inhibitors, which prevent boys from developing a low voice and beard growth and girls from developing breasts and other feminine shapes.

There are many criticisms of the study. Questionnaires were inconsistent, there was no control group at all, and the researchers used random samples from the 196 treated children for the results.

Several countries are moving away from ‘puberty blockers’

In the meantime, there is objection in more and more countries to the treatment of children with “puberty blockers”. Not only are they said to impair the physical sexual development of minors, but they can also cause osteoporosis, anorgasmia and infertility. According to the NRC, the drug is said to sometimes even impair the ability to make rational decisions.

Worldwide, there is increasing criticism of the scientific content and non-existent empirical basis of the Dutch protocol developed at the gender clinic of the Free University of Amsterdam. In several countries, health authorities have already decided to treat children mainly psychologically and prescribe puberty inhibitors only exceptionally. In Sweden, they concluded that “the risks currently outweigh the possible benefits” and spoke of possibly the country’s “worst medical scandal”.

In the UK, criticism of the Dutch protocol was so serious that the Tavistock gender clinic, the largest in the world, was closed by the authorities.

Sweden, Finland and Great Britain only want to prescribe the drug in rare, particularly severe cases. Instead, they are increasingly relying on psychological support for patients.

Since February last year, Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare has followed the Karolinska Institute’s policy regarding hormonal interventions for gender-dysphoric minors. Karolinska’s pediatric gender services at Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital (ALB) has ended the practice of prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to gender-dysphoric patients under the age of 18.

Marketing redundant drugs for the wrong condition

In the US, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been investigating two pharmaceutical companies for advertising puberty blockers to children. This is a condition they are not approved to treat.

In December, Paxton announced investigations under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act into Endo Pharmaceuticals and AbbVie Inc., the two companies that sell puberty blockers. The drugs were approved to treat precocious puberty and forms of prostate cancer but were being marketed and prescribed off-label to treat gender dysphoria.

“These drugs were approved for very different purposes and can have detrimental and even irreversible side effects,” Paxton said. “I will not allow pharmaceutical companies to take advantage of Texas children.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2023/01/13/who-designed-global-guidelines-for-puberty-blockers/

With all the evidence of mRNA vaccine injury, why aren’t more doctors speaking out?

Image: Pixabay / Pixabay license

By H.P. Smith

I listened to an interesting interview recently with Dr. Aseem Malhotra by Bret Weinstein of The Darkhorse Podcast  on Dec. 31, 2022. 

The beginning of the interview focused on Dr. Malhotra, a British cardiologist, telling his story of how he went from being a COVID-19 vaccine advocate to someone who was questioning the mRNA jabs, at least partially brought on by the death of his own father.  His father was also a physician and had been in favor of the shots, which Dr. Malhotra said in a recent tweet “…should likely never have been approved and certainly not without informed consent.” 

It was a very touching story, and it was very clear that Dr. Malhotra cared deeply for his father.  Any loss of this type — unnecessary and wasteful — is tragic, and anyone with an ounce of compassion can’t help but empathize.

But there were some troubling aspects of the interview.  One in particular was that Dr. Malhotra had been onboard with the mRNA jabs, and I couldn’t help but wonder how many people he recommended take the shots.  How many people may have suffered an adverse affect or worse because of his advice?  

 Very early on, I was skeptical of these new treatments.  I graduated college with a B.S. in Biology more than 25 years ago, but my career is in finance (long story)…so I understood enough about the scientific process that I was doubtful of their proclaimed “safety.”  Long term safety at that point (and still now) literally could not have been known.  It was far too early.

I researched them and quickly found people like Dr. Simone Gold (America’s Frontline Doctors) and Dr. Peter McCullough…individuals who were willing to risk their careers and reputations to get the message out that maybe we needed to slow down and learn more about the new vaccines.  To me, that was powerful, and rang very true.

I knew very early that I would not be getting any of the shots, and I warned others to give them very careful consideration.  How did Dr. Malhotra and so many others…thousands of others!…miss something that even a layperson strongly suspected?  How did they not ask more questions? 

That leads to the real issue here:  With what we are learning now and the rapidly accumulating evidence, how are more doctors not speaking out about this?  And why are so many still recommending the mRNA shots to their patients?  Boosters, boosters, boosters.  

I changed to a new doctor as my primary care physician recently, and had my first appointment.  The doctor mentioned that he doesn’t prescribe new medications that have not been around for at least five years, so I asked him how he reconciles that philosophy with the mRNA shots.  He dodged the question three times until it was clear I wouldn’t let it go.  I finally asked him, “Is it your policy to recommend them or the hospitals?”  He said nothing, but stared straight into my eyes for a solid five seconds.  It felt very much like an admission.

He went on to say that if he doesn’t recommend the shots, he will lose his job and possibly his license.  My appointment was the first week of December 2022, and my exit paperwork is three pages…two of which are almost entirely dedicated to pushing the COVID shots.

The first line under What You Need to Know is “COVID-19 Vaccines are safe and effective.”  They are still saying this!  This is extraordinary.  They still cannot know the long-term effects of the shots; still too soon.  Not to mention that (especially young) otherwise healthy people are dropping left and right (often of heart attacks and strokes), none more publicly than Damar Hamlin of the Buffalo Bills last week.  Myocarditis rates, which used to be roughly 4 in 1,000,000 are now 25,000 in 1,000,000.  

All through the rollout of the “vaccines” and the controversy surrounding medications like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, something we heard from the news, government authorities and health care personnel was the phrase “evidence-based medicine.” 

My former doctor parroted that talking point to me personally.  Now that the evidence against the safety and efficacy of the shots is piling up — and thanks to Elon Musk — is being discussed in the open marketplace of ideas, how is it that more doctors aren’t standing up and speaking out?  

I’ll tell you.  It’s out of fear, cowardice and control.  Fear of losing their licenses to practice medicine, cowardice to face the people they have very likely harmed and the control the hospitals hold over most of them.  Corporate bosses now dictate what medicine gets practiced, and our physicians have willingly handed over control in the interest of their own personal wealth. 

The health care industry has lost an enormous amount of credibility and lost the trust of millions of people.  I am historically a big believer in vaccines, as one of the most important medical breakthroughs in history, but I am now going to be very skeptical about putting anything these companies come up with into my body.  

The irony of all of this is that millions of people who have been erroneously labeled “anti-vaxxers” for being against these shots are now, by way of their own evidence-based thinking, being turned into actual anti-vaxxers (by the new definition of “vaccine”, that is) before our very eyes.  If the medical field wants to regain our trust, doctors need to stand up now and do what’s right.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/01/with_all_the_evidence_of_mrna_vaccine_injury_why_arent_more_doctors_speaking_out.html

AfD politician suffers brutal assault on Hamburg bus in suspected politically motivated attack

Marc-Manuel Kunstmann was attacked on a bus on his way home last Friday.

A local politician for the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party was viciously attacked by two men last Friday as he rode the bus home in the port city of Hamburg.

The incident occurred in the Billstedt district of the city as Marc-Manuel Kunstmann, son of prominent German actress, was traveling home on a bus. The victim claims to have been recognized by two men and was savagely beaten on public transport.

“They must have recognized me as an AfD’er,” 45-year-old Kunstmann, who is chairman of the AfD district group in Hamburg-Mitte, claimed in a Facebook post detailing the attack.

He described how he had his headphones in his ears when he was “suddenly hit by a blow.”

“I immediately went to the driver and asked him for help,” Kunstmann said. However, it is understood that instead of intervening or providing assistance, the bus driver ordered the politician off the bus onto the sidewalk. He was followed by the two assailants, and the attack continued on the street.

“I curled up on the floor in the fetal position and tried to dial emergency services,” Kunstmann revealed, posting graphic photos of his injuries, which included a cut lip, facial bruises, and several cracked teeth.

The AfD politician described his attackers as “definitely southerners” or foreigners.

A police patrol vehicle was fortunately close by to intervene and arrest the two men.

“The state security is investigating and checking whether there could be a political motive,” a police spokesperson told media following the attack. The spokesperson also confirmed the authorities had arrested two male suspects, aged 28 and 35. No further description of the men was provided by the police.

According to German tabloid Bild, the two suspects are known to police for various previous offenses including actual bodily harm, drunk driving, and urinating in public.

A police investigation into the attack is continuing, while Kunstmann has filed a complaint against the bus driver for “failure to provide assistance.”

The AfD party has since spoken out regarding the attack and called for “timely criminal consequences.”

“AfD members are not fair game,” said the party’s state chairman Dirk Nockemann in a statement.

https://rmx.news/crime/afd-politician-suffers-brutal-assault-on-hamburg-bus-in-suspected-politically-motivated-attack/

New secret documents found in Joe Biden’s private quarters

Joe Biden in the Oval Office. Facebook

For the second time in a few days, US President Biden’s employees have found secret documents in private rooms. The 80-year-old leader cited gaps in his memory.

President Joe Biden’s staff have discovered more secret documents outside the White House. This was reported by several US media, citing unnamed sources. The White House has since confirmed what happened.

Only on Monday did it become public that the Democrat had kept confidential documents from his time as Vice President under Barack Obama in his private office. According to reports, the documents are at least ten confidential papers, including those with the highest classification level.

In response to the find that became public on Monday, the President said he did not know how the documents got there and what they contained. A similar case with former US President Donald Trump (Republican) had led to a massive invasive search of his property in Florida. The Democrats had sharply criticized Trump for this.

At the time, Biden-appointed Attorney General Merrick Garland had set up a special counsel to investigate whether Trump may have committed a serious criminal offense. Regarding the latest discoveries, Republican Representative Elise Stefanik wrote, “We will demand answers, stop politicizing the corrupt FBI and Justice Department, and hold the Biden crime family accountable.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2023/01/13/new-secret-documents-found-in-joe-bidens-private-office/

France: A former Islamist terrorist and his “religiously married on social networks” companions are convicted of child pornography offences

Three people were sentenced on Thursday by the court in Tulle to 7 and 2 years in prison without parole and 8 months on probation. A man and two women were on trial for possession and distribution of child pornographic images. The man is serving time in Uzerche Prison for offences that are already related to child pornography. The two women are his partner and his ex-partner, who had passed a mobile phone to him in prison so that he could visit child pornography sites.

[…] The man is 30 years old, but has already spent 10 years behind bars. Drugs, violence, thefts – he’s done it all since he was 14 years old. Even terrorism: in 2015 he was sentenced to six years in prison in Paris for trying to build a bomb in his garage. […] Among other things, he claimed that when he was released, he wanted to kill one person from the police or judicial apparatus for each of his years in prison.

This is where his two wives emerge, both converts to Islam, whom he met via social networks and even married religiously. Neither are obviously bothered by their husband’s terrorist past. Nor really by his penchant for taking pictures of young children. One of them has even acquired a taste for it herself: She has a criminal record for raping minors under 15. France Bleu

https://www.fdesouche.com/2023/01/13/tulle-19-un-ancien-terroriste-et-ses-compagnes-epousees-religieusement-sur-les-reseaux-sociaux-sont-condamnes-pour-des-faits-lies-a-la-pedopornographie/