Month: May 2022
According to Eric Zemmour, veiled women “could” be anchoring the news in France in 30 years’ time
Will veiled women be anchoring the news in 30 years? This hypothesis is possible, according to Eric Zemmour. The founder of “Reconquête!” asserted that veiled women could present the news on French television in 30 years, as Sud-Ouest reports. “Look at what is happening in the Islamised suburbs. Look at the incredible number of veils in Roubaix, in the Parisian suburbs …” he said.
The former journalist asserted that “it is not an ultra-minority”, citing several polls as examples. “70 percent of French Muslims want the burkini in swimming pools, at least that it is not banned, and 75 percent want to allow separate opening hours,” he claimed.
An I statement that followed the Taliban’s decision to force Afghan women presenters to cover their faces. The new regime seems to shy away from doing anything to prevent Afghan women from enjoying the few rights they have left. When the Taliban took the helm of the state, they assured that they would be more moderate than during their previous rule between 1996 and 2001. In particular, they promised that women’s concerns would be taken into account and that they would be a part of Taliban society.
However, since August 2021, nothing has been achieved in their favour: the government is composed only of men, the Ministry of Women’s Affairs has been abolished and replaced by the Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, there is no mixed gender in universities, the wearing of the burqa has become compulsory…
France: “Wallah, you dirty faggot. By the Koran” A pupil is attacked and injured with a sabre by a gang during sports lessons in Evry-Courcouronnes, the teacher was also beaten
He had taken part in a simple competition. He suffered six stitches and got off with a scare. On Wednesday May 18, 15-year-old Walid (first name altered) was attacked by a gang with a katana, a Japanese sword, during gym class. His mother filed a complaint at the police station. The Evry-Courcouronnes public prosecutor’s office confirmed on Monday on request that an investigation had been opened for “serious violence” (in a group, using a weapon and against a minor) and “participation in an association for the purpose of committing an offence”.
[…]
When he was looking for markers with two comrades, he came across three hostile youths at around 8.45 am. According to his report, which we were able to review, they asked him: “Why are you coming here?”. Walid claims he does not know the three. As soon as he replied, “What do you mean?” one of the three youths brandished a small sabre and struck him hard on the head with the blade, seriously injuring him.
There is another brawl with punches and kicks between the students and about ten youths from Les Épinettes who have come for reinforcement. According to our information, the sports teacher also suffered blows when he tried to separate the protagonists. The Versailles school board confirmed on Monday, upon request, that the teacher “accompanied by his headmistress will file a complaint with the Evry police on Tuesday”.Le Parisien
Mahyar REACTS To Klaus Schwab’s Globalist Speech At Davos 2022 🙄 😮
Pro-abortion signs highlight ignorance, inanity, vulgarity
By Eric Utter
An extraordinarily high percentage of the signs wielded by pro-abortion demonstrators are mind-bogglingly dumb and/or nonsensical. One of these inane sentiments (see below) has prompted me to write this post. That sign/sentiment? ”Guns have more rights than my vagina.”
Really? Let’s examine the facts. First of all, it must be noted that the vastmajority of gun owners don’t stick a penis in their gun’s barrel and climax in it. They do have to subject themselves to a thorough background check by the feds, answer more than a dozen probing questions, fill out a 2-page form, and hand over several hundred dollars or more before they can take their firearms home with them. Oh, and they are also forced to present a current, valid, government-issued I.D.! (I don’t know how so many minority gun owners accomplish this feat!)
Moreover, firearms owners are prohibited from taking their guns into many public –and private places. By contrast, vagina owners are generally free to travel wherever they wish to go. None of the demented sign-carrying “ladies” have ever walked into, say, a library or retail outlet and seen a sign saying, “This is a vagina-free zone.” So back off, rabidly ignorant and entitled placard possessing protesters. If you don’t want a baby, don’t recklessly engage in the act that creates them.
Otherwise, you become a greater threat to life than any firearm.
And, speaking of rights, are you absolutely sure a baby in your vagina has none?
Abort your signs, not your babies.
Calling everything racist ‘undermines calling out actual racism that is happening.’ Calvin Robinson
UK: Muslim migrant doctor who sexually assaulted nurse is cleared to treat patients again
Rejected asylum seekers should receive same social benefits as unemployed, says Germany’s top union boss
In the past, asylum seekers received German Hartz IV social benefits after 18 months in the country, however, Ukrainian refugees receive full support immediately. Now, the new head of German Trade Union Confederation (DGB), Yasmin Fahimi, wants all asylum seekers to receive the same benefits at the same time, including even for those who had their asylum claims rejected.
“I do not understand why we still maintain this system of distinguishing between basic security and asylum seeker benefits,” Fahimi told journalists.
So far, asylum seekers have only received basic security welfare after a year and a half. If immigrants are recognized as refugees, they receive Hartz IV benefits only from when their application is approved. Now, according to Fahimi, the funds should flow immediately.
As Remix News has previously reported, there are an estimated 43,000 asylum seekers in Germany who by law should actually be in Greece, as that is the first country they registered in. These economic migrants have been identified as taking vital housing accommodations from Ukrainian refugees, who are often women and children versus economic migrants from Middle Eastern and African countries, who are often young men. Delivering benefits to all asylum seekers will likely exacerbate Germany’s migrant crisis, place more burdens on the housing market, andadd billions in expenses to an already overburdened German taxpayer.
Nevertheless, Germany’s most pro-migrant organizations and political parties are lining up behind the proposal.
“Our goal must be equal treatment for all refugees, and on the same level as the people fleeing from Ukraine are treated,” claimed the chairwoman of the council of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD), Annette Kurschus. The EKD is known for its radically pro-migration stance, but most of Germany’s religious organizations are strong promoters of mass immigration.
Pro Asyl, Germany’s largest pro immigration advocacy organization, echoed a similar sentiment to the EKD.
The Greens want to abolish the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act and are claiming that refugees are treated unequal and this policy must end.
The Free Democratic Party (FDP) has made similar remarks, with Manuel Höferlin recently telling Die Welt newspaper that the coalition wanted a fresh start in migration and integration policy to become a modern immigrant country.
“To this aim, the traffic light partners strive for coherent immigration law. That should offer quick and easy solutions for those seeking protection,” Höferlin stated.
AfD rejects the proposal
However, both the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) are against these proposals, however, the AfD has offered the strongest pushback.
“It is good and right that we help the women and children fleeing the war in Ukraine to us quickly and unbureaucratically. However, the AfD parliamentary group considers the transfer of refugees from Ukraine to basic security wrong. That is what the Asylum Seekers Benefits Act is for,” said AfD parliamentary group leader Alice Weidel.
Other members of the AfD have also rejected the proposal, with AfD spokesperson René Springer writing:
“This is exactly what the AfD faction warned about has happened: if the DGB boss has her way, asylum seekers would in the future have direct access to the German basic security system. This would give them full entitlement to all Hartz IV benefits, including accommodation costs and statutory health insurance. Last week, the Bundestag also decided to suspend the Hartz IV sanctions, which means even uemployed people refusing to work may no longer be sanctioned by the job centers. The DGB requirement is nothing more than a basic income for asylum seekers. Germany, which is already a strong immigration magnet, will face even worse pressure.
According to Weidel, therefore, the AfD firmly rejects “transferring all other refugees to basic security and thus extending the claims for all asylum seekers in Germany.”
The CDU also considers the unequal treatment to be justified because the entitlement to protection “was rightly given to Ukrainians from day one” and “no separate examination” was required, but even rejected asylum seekers receive “in Germany the highest social benefits for refugees in Europe,” according to Alexander Throm, the spokesman for domestic affairs for the CDU/CSU parliamentary group.
Switzerland: Fired Egyptian heart surgeon threatens to kill hospital workers
The Zurich District Court on Monday sentenced a paediatric heart surgeon to a fine for multiple threats. The 45-year-old had threatened staff members of the children’s hospital with death.
For the court, it was established that at a mediation session in 2019, sentences were uttered that “made everyone present feel uncomfortable afterwards”, as the judge put it. These statements had affected all the aggrieved parties’ sense of security.
The heart surgeon therefore received a fine of 80 daily fines of 30 francs for multiple threats, conditional on a probationary period of two years. The sentence is not yet legally binding. The doctor can still appeal to the higher court.
Those present, including members of the management of the children’s hospital, all said that they had been threatened with death by the previously dismissed doctor. Among other things, he had announced that he would get justice, but that he would “not get his hands dirty”.
Where he comes from, Egypt, such things are done differently, but he has connections, the doctor said, according to the other participants in the meeting. In another case, he had attacked someone with his car, “and then boom, two metres in the air”. After the meeting, the children’s hospital filed a complaint with the police and hired armed security.
The threats also had an impact on the private lives of the meeting participants. They all felt threatened and hired their own security guards to accompany them from then on. One bought a pepper spray, another prepared his army pistol. They cancelled events, left the shutters down and forbade their children to play outside.
The conflict was triggered by the children’s hospital dismissing the doctor, citing “inappropriate social behaviour” and “insufficient performance” as reasons for termination. The surgeon appealed and even went on hunger strike in April 2019 to protest his dismissal. Various media reported on the escalated dispute.
His lawyer argued on Monday that his client had not threatened violence at all, but that there would be a legal dispute. If the participants in the meeting felt threatened, that was “their own perception”, according to the lawyer.
It was not his client’s statements that were problematic, but the prejudices of the participants. They had a preconceived opinion because of his Egyptian origin. In addition, they had not understood him well because of his lack of knowledge of German.
In the minutes of an earlier crisis meeting, the hospital had accused him of having “delusions regarding his honour”. His client was portrayed as a “high-grade psychopath”. Keywords such as “Egyptian, Muslim, status symbols, loss of face” were also mentioned in these minutes. For an institution like the hospital, this is not only unprofessional, “it has a racist undertone”.
The dispute is now not over even with this ruling. In June, the parties will meet again in court, among other things because of the employer’s reference. The heart surgeon is demanding more benevolent wording.