Cyberbullying of critic of Islam Mila: The accused are given sentences ranging from 3 months suspended to 4 months in prison by French court

Photo: Mila – Screenshot youtube

A more than expected verdict. Six men and women who had been tried in April for hate messages and calls for murder against Mila, a young woman who had been harassed online since her polemical video criticising Islam in 2020, were sentenced on Tuesday May 24 by the Paris Criminal Court to prison terms ranging from three months suspended to four months. Among them were three mothers who had been investigated last September by gendarmes from the Central Office for Combating Crimes against Humanity, Genocide and War Crimes (OCLCH), Le Parisien reported.

Melinda D., mother of two children, who had already been convicted several times for theft, fraud and driving without a licence, was only convicted for threatening to kill. The other five defendants were convicted of felonious stalking.

In addition to the prison sentences, which include a 30,000 euro fine for online harassment and a 45,000 euro fine for death threats, all defendants must pay Mila 3,000 euros for her non-material damage. They will also be deprived of the right to stand for election for one year.

“The sentencing of the six defendants was necessary,” reacted Mila’s lawyer Richard Malka, stressing that “just a few words on a social network can have serious consequences for the perpetrators”. “I have no satisfaction that these young people were convicted. My only satisfaction in this case would be that Mila can live a normal life again … and that is not the case,” the lawyer continued, referring to the daily life of the young woman, who has been under police protection since 2020.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/societe/cyberharcelement-de-mila-les-accuses-ecopent-de-3-mois-avec-sursis-a-4-mois-ferme

Macron’s new radical education minister promotes woke social science, believes France is ‘structurally racist’

In a decision that has sent ripples through the French political system, French President Emmanuel Macron has chosen controversial historian Pap Ndiaye as the country’s new education minister despite his promotion of racist claims about Whites and a long career almost entirely devoted to racial grievance.

Ndiaye, the director of the Museum of the History of Immigration and a “specialist” in the “social history of the United States and minorities,” has made a wide range of statements that are raising concerns about how he might transform France’s education system.

He doesn’t like the term “anti-White racism”

In the past, he has stated the term “anti-White racism” is part of a “far-right vocabulary that has spread well beyond the far right, and it is in part validated by a much more central world in French political and social life.” For him, it is important  to “deconstruct” this vocabulary.

It is unclear how the term needs to be “deconstructed” or why it is a problem that French society recognizes that anti-White racism exists.

Even the French court system has recognized instances of anti-White racism in French society, for example, when judges found Nick Conrad guilty for inciting racial violence for his rap video entitled “PLB,” which is a French acronym for “Hang the Whites.” The song featured lyrics such as: “I go to the nurseries, I kill the White babies. Catch them quick and hang their parents!”

The music video, quickly deleted from Youtube, depicted the rapper chasing down, torturing and murdering a White man.

Ndiaye attended a meeting banned for White people

Despite claiming that “there is indeed structural racism in France,” he himself attended a meeting in 2016 in which all White people were banned from attending. The meeting focused on the topic of “being Black in France.”

Following news of his appointment, one of Ndiaye’s critics referenced the fact that he attended such a meeting despite purportedly standing against racism.

“We now have a minister who participated in a meeting forbidden to Whites and who believes in systemic racism. It is madness,” said MEP Gilbert Collard, who said during an interview on BFMTV that he considers the new education minister as “incompatible with a republican national education.”

He advocated for fewer White people at the Paris Opera

Ndiaye also served as a “diversity consultant” with the Paris Opera, where he co-authored a report calling for the entry of more “non-White artists” and condemning the lack of ethnic diversity in the opera. The report also recommended that the Paris Opera hire a diversity officer to oversee a radical overhaul of the ethnic composition of the French cultural establishment.

The report recommended abandoning “the idea that homogeneity is an absolute.” Ndiaye also quoted dancers who complained that because they are not White, they would be unable to dance in Swan Lake.

The Paris Opera appeared to have responded by banning some of the most famous ballet performances at the famed opera house, including Swan Lake, The Nutcracker, and the Yankee Princess over alleged “White supremacy.”

Referred to “revenge of the White world”

Following Donald Trump’s election victory in the United States, Ndiaye controversially equated Trump’s victory to a form of “revenge” from White people.

“Obama’s election may have led people to believe that white men had definitively lost power (…) Trump’s victory is the revenge of the white world,” he said at the time.

Although the majority of Trump’s vote share was from White people, this demographic group also makes up a majority of the U.S. population. Trump also won significant shares of Hispanic votes, along with smaller shares of Black and Asian voters. However, Whites also voted for Hillary Clinton in significant numbers, underlining the inaccuracy of Nidaye’s blanket racist term “White world” when referring to the Whites who voted for Trump.

Claims there is “structural racism in France”

Nidaye believes that France is fundamentally a racist place, despite rising to one of the most powerful positions in the French government while enjoying a professorship and a well-paid career around promoting multiculturalism and diversity.

“There is indeed structural racism in France,” Ndiaye said in the past.

Shock over Nidaye’s appointment

There was little sign that the outsider Nidaye would take over responsibility for France’s education system, with his past statements galvanizing opposition to his appointment.

Invited by BFMTV to react to the appointment of Ndiaye as education minister, Éric Zemmour, who is the leader of the Reconquista political party, said he considered that the new education minister is “wokeist, obsessed with race, and a person who will defend his convictions to the detriment of our children.”

Others stated that Ndiaye showed ingratitude to the country through his worldview.

“Pap Ndiaye is the archetype of someone whom the Republic has given everything and allowed to ascend by merit. However, that does not prevent him from systematically castigating France, its institutions and its people as the eternal culprits. It is an ingratitude that becomes very exasperating,” wrote National Rally interim President Jordan Bordella.

What is Ndiaye’s background?

Ndiaye is a specialist in the “social history of the United States and minorities, which includes research in the “history and sociology of the black populations in France.” The 56-year-old is the son of a Senegalese father and French mother, but his Black father abandoned him when he was young, and he was raised by his White mother in a story that is strikingly similar to Barack Obama’s own background.

His appointment is especially controversial as he seems to represent the exact style of woke American “intellectualism” his predecessor, Jean-Michel Blanquer, claimed to fight against in the previous years under the previous Macron administration. Blanquer, for example, referred to the apparent alliance between leftists and Islamists as “Islamo-leftism.” Ndiaye, on the other hand, said such a term stigmatizes “intersectionality,” which he views as an important analytical tool.

Ndiaye first came to prominence with his 2008 book, “The Black Condition, an essay on a French minority,” but since then he has built a career almost single-handedly around the topic of race. The new education minister fiercely rejects criticism of “wokeism,” describing it as more of a “scarecrow” than a real phenomenon. He instead maintains the position that there is “structural racism” in France and that institutions like the police partake in racist practices but are in denial about this alleged reality

Ndiaye has previously called himself a product of pure republican meritocracy, and has not achieved his success based on skin color, but instead on his own merit.

Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne defended Ndiaye’s appointment as education minister, describing him as a “very committed republican.”

The newly-reshuffled Macron ,government takes its seat about a month before the French parliamentary elections where Macron will face a newly-forged alliance of the united leftist parties.

https://rmx.news/article/macrons-new-radical-education-minister-promotes-woke-social-science-said-france-is-structurally-racist/

Germany: Syrian burglar attacks mourners during funeral

In Ludwigslust, participants of a funeral came home where a burglar ran across them. The man not only attacked the mourners, but also the police.

Several mourners in Ludwigslust caught a burglar in the act on Friday afternoon. The 26-year-old alleged perpetrator was temporarily arrested by the police a short time later.

As the police reported as late as Monday, the mourners had returned home after a funeral when they noticed the door of their home had been broken open. Shortly afterwards, the burglar came running out of the house. The offender allegedly attacked the seven guests, leaving four people slightly injured.

When the police arrived, the suspect immediately attacked the officers and tried to hit them. The police then used irritant gas against the 26-year-old and handcuffed him. Finally, he was taken to the police station.

According to initial findings, the burglar was after cash. According to the victims, he stole about 1000 euros from the house. The police were able to seize some of the money on the spot. When the police arrived, the 26-year-old had thrown an envelope with several hundred euros in cash into a bush.

The man, who comes from Syria, is now being investigated for burglary, assault against police officers and bodily harm.

https://www.nordkurier.de/mecklenburg-vorpommern/trauergaeste-stellen-einbrecher-auf-frischer-tat-2348297505.html

Libyan rapes and strangles 20-year-old – German court passes lenient sentence

A Libyan man has been sentenced to nine years in prison in Hamburg. The prosecution had accused the man of rape and murder of a 20-year-old and demanded a life sentence. But the sentence was now much more lenient.

The violent death of a 20-year-old woman at the beginning of last year in Hamburg’s Neuallermöhe district was not murder, according to the conviction of the competent chamber of the Regional Court. In the case of the death of the young woman in the bicycle cellar of her apartment building, the district court sentenced the accused to nine years in prison.

The 24-year-old was guilty of attempted murder by omission and of giving narcotics resulting in death, explained Birgit Woitas, chairperson of the criminal division, in her statement of reasons for the verdict on Monday.

The prosecution had assumed murder in connection with rape and sexual assault. The accused had been stalking the 20-year-old for months, threatening her and beating her at least once, the prosecutor explained in her plea. The young woman had refused contact and finally even called the police.

However, on January 9, 2021, she had met with the accused, presumably to buy drugs from him. After taking a methadone tablet, she allowed herself to be led to the bicycle cellar in her house. There, the man allegedly raped the 20-year-old and suffocated her with his jeans.

The 24-year-old had explained through his defence lawyers that he had gone to a playground with the woman in the evening. After consensual sex in a bush, they had sat on a park bench until 4.00 a.m. Then they went to the basement of the apartment building, where the woman fell asleep. It was only after 1 p.m. that he noticed she was no longer breathing and alerted the emergency services.

The court had not seen sufficient evidence for murder already at the opening of the trial. Therefore, the admitted charge was initially manslaughter. The judges now decided that there was not even enough evidence for manslaughter. It could not be said with sufficient certainty that the Libyan had raped the woman and actively blocked her airways.

However, it is also undisputed by the court that the accused had given the young woman a methadone tablet and an antispasmodic medication on the evening of January 9th. Afterwards, both had had sexual intercourse. The judge explained that it could not be established beyond doubt that this had happened against the woman’s will. Afterwards, the 20-year-old woman had become unconscious and the accused had dragged her into the bicycle cellar.

He had recognised the danger of methadone, but had not called for help in time. However, it remained unclear when he realised that she would die without help. At the same time, it was unclear whether the woman could have been saved at that time. Therefore, the crime was to be assessed as attempted murder by omission.

The prosecution had demanded life imprisonment, as had the plaintiff. The defence pleaded for acquittal. The verdict is not yet final.

https://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/article238941037/Tod-im-Fahrradkeller-Neun-Jahre-Haft-fuer-24-Jaehrigen.html

A coincidence? Sex allegations after Elon Musk changes political course

A strange coincidence: Sooner after Elon Musk announced on Twitter that he would vote Republican in future because US Democrats had become the “party of division and hatred”, sex allegations against the world’s richest man suddenly surfaced.

According to the US news portal Insider, Musk’s successful company SpaceX allegedly paid a female employee $250 000 in hush money. The alleged reason was that the space and telecommunications company founded by Musk wanted to cover up a case of sexual harassment in 2016.

The incident allegedly occurred during a flight to London in Elon Musk’s jet. The flight attendant hired a California lawyer in 2018. According to Insider, they reached an agreement after meeting with a mediator. Then, in November 2018, Space X paid the woman $250 000, he said.

SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell defended Musk after the sexual misconduct allegations surfaced. “Personally, I believe the allegations to be false; not because I work for Elon, but because I have worked closely with him for 20 years and never seen nor heard anything resembling these allegations.”

Elon Musk had predicted just two days ago that the political attacks on him would increase. After announcing on May 18 that he would vote Republican in the future, he added the telling remark on Twitter: “Now, watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold…”

Earlier, Musk had announced that his deal to buy Twitter was “temporarily on hold” because of uncertainty over the platform’s fake and spam accounts allegedly only representing less than 5 percent of users. He demanded details supporting the calculation. Twitter may not have been honest about the extent of its bots.

Almost half of US President Joe Biden’s 22,3 million followers on Twitter are fake accounts, according to Newsweek. The weekly cited analysis by SparkToro which Musk had also used to pause his acquisition of the social media giant.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/05/24/a-coincidence-sex-allegations-after-elon-musk-changes-political-course/

Australian Politician at Davos Explains that We Need a “Recalibration” of Freedom of Speech

Proportion of foreign pupils in Berlin schools concealed

Berlin’s mayor Giffey wants even more immigration for her already ethnically “diversified” city. Meanwhile, the problems of imported “diversity” are swept under the carpet: The Senate wants to conceal the huge language and integration problems in the capital’s schools by no longer publishing information on the proportion of foreign or non-German-speaking pupils.

The Red-Green-Red Senate in Berlin is truly trying everything to conceal the consequences of its disastrous migration policy. This also extends to parents’ choice of school for their children. For some time now, it has been planned to remove information on the number of pupils where German is not spoken at home (“non-German language of origin”, abbreviated “ndH”) from the school directory. However, this is often the most important for parents when looking for a school for their children.

Unlawful administrative practice

The senate, as it said at the beginning of the year, wants to create a social index instead, in which the language spoken at home, the number of pupils who have repeated a grade, the staffing, the number of pupils exempt from learning aid, the staffing of the schools and data on the social structure of the district are merged – but without a specifically designated migrant quota. Only internally will the proportion of “non-German language of origin” continue to be recorded.

An expert opinion commissioned by the AfD from the independent Scientific Parliamentary Service has now come to the clear conclusion: “According to the current legal situation in the state of Berlin, there is in principle a right of access […] to the statistical individual school data.” Classification as classified information could only be considered in the case of internal and external security. Moreover, the data records are not personalised, but anonymised.

AfD education expert Thorsten Weiß explained: “In particular, the proportion of pupils with a non-German language of origin is an important criterion for many parents when choosing a school. Thanks to the expert opinion we commissioned, it is clear: parents have a right to this information; the Red-Green-Red attempt to conceal grievances at schools is unlawful.”

Left-wing eyewash

SPD representatives insist that “social status is often more decisive than origin” or that the proportion of pupils with a non-German language of origin allegedly says nothing about the quality of a school. The CDU education expert Katharina Günther-Wünsch counters that the funds for additional language instruction are based on the ndH quota, without which there would have been fewer staff members.

The proportion of non-German pupils in Berlin for public schools is already 41,1 percent. The attempt to delete the quite relevant information suggests the covering up of information about migrants if it does not fit into the prescribed positive narrative. One of the most recent statements by the governing mayor Franziska Giffey, which she had her party announce on Twitter, was a sign of this: “A Berlin without immigration is hardly imaginable. How poor our city would be without these experiences!”

Ignoring reality instead of solving problems

In Berlin, however, the euphoria about naturalisation is not limited to the ruling ultra-left government coalition, but is also supported by the CDU and the FDP, where the only criticism is that the municipal administration is sluggish. For example, CDU MP Björn Wohlert used the usual phrases: “We should promote the German passport, but under clear conditions: Language, work, liberal values, acceptance of our way of life.” Instead of the new naturalisation centre, of course, there needs to be even “more staff in the offices, faster digitised procedures and more consultation hours at work-friendly times”.

Criticism against Giffey’s plans came only from the AfD. Its state chairperson Kristin Brinker said: “Giffey’s naturalisation centre is a clumsy advertising campaign for migrant voters”, with which the mayor wants to “retroactively legalise the illegal migration of the past years”.

Berlin mired in allegations of voter fraud

The irregularities surrounding the election to the Berlin House of Representatives, which took place at the same time as the general election, are probably far greater than previously assumed. As the Berliner Zeitung reported, false ballots are said to have been deliberately handed out in a polling station in Friedrichshain, which were later declared invalid. Around eighty voters lost their votes for the election of MPs.

The election in Berlin on September 26, 2021, which was overshadowed by numerous mishaps, is also occupying the courts. The Berlin State Constitutional Court is currently examining several complaints and has requested statements from all 2 257 polling stations. The conditions in individual polling stations that have been made public so far make a new election to the Berlin House of Representatives appear more and more likely.

Among other things, the following were criticized: Waiting for hours, missing, incomplete or invalid ballot papers and election workers who wanted to send citizens home before they even voted. In the case of the Friedrichshain polling station, ballots for the wrong district were allegedly delivered.

“The responsible officials in the district electoral office acted in a shockingly lax way and apparently devoid of any respect for jurisdiction,” exclaimed former member of parliament and free voter candidate Marcel Luthe in an interview with the Berliner Zeitung.

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/05/24/proportion-of-foreign-pupils-in-berlin-schools-concealed/