On the Tagesthemen programme, Thomas Mücke described the terrorist driver Abdul Ballout as very friendly and not aggressive.
Just two weeks before carrying out his attack, the Islamist terrorist from the Tiergarten neighborhood of Berlin, Abdul Ballout, had been in contact with Thomas Mücke, the managing director of the deradicalisation organisation “Violence Prevention Network”. NIUS investigations now reveal that the man who was supposed to “deradicalise” Abdul Ballout is part of the NGO network.
Last Saturday, the Islamist terrorist Abdul Ballout rammed his car into a crowd at Christopher Street Day in Berlin. One woman was killed and 29 other people were injured. The following evening, the police located the perpetrator and shot him dead. Shortly afterwards, it emerged that the attacker had held meetings with Thomas Mücke regarding “deradicalisation” just two weeks before his attack.
That is, the man whose deradicalisation NGO, the ‘Violence Prevention Network’, according to NIUS’s investigations, not only received almost 70 million in taxpayers’ money between 2014 and 2024, but who is also on the board of another NGO: ‘Gangway e. V.’. A street social work organisation designed to help teenagers and young people from disadvantaged backgrounds with their problems. However, the organisation does not just help young people; it also engages in left-wing propaganda. The 2023 annual report of “Gangway e.V.” refers to so-called “girls’ work”, which involves various services for girls and young women. The aim of these services is: “To address gender-specific issues and provide safe spaces for reflecting on and breaking free from gender roles”.
The leaflet shows four young women wearing headscarves, a symbol of Islamic patriarchy. They are holding large lasertag guns. The fact that Thomas Mücke is the managing director of a deradicalisation NGO seems almost cynical when you look at these images.
The ‘gender-specific work’ carried out by ‘Gangway e.V.’ includes, amongst other things, laser tag events for Muslim girls.
Unfortunately, however, it wasn’t just these images. Ahead of the 2023 Berlin House of Representatives election, the association’s Wedding branch published a poster in the style of the AfD’s ‘Germany. But normal.’ campaign – albeit with the slogan: ‘Germany, but halal.’ In Islam, the Arabic word ‘halal’ means ‘permitted’ or ‘pure’.
The demand that Germany should conform to Islamic standards is shocking – particularly given that Thomas Mücke, who is also tasked with deradicalising Islamists, is a board member of ‘Gangway’.
The Gangway local group in Wedding posted a message to mark the 2023 Berlin parliamentary elections which also demonstrates just how ideologically driven the NGO’s work is. The social media post states that “the potato does not belong in Germany”.
The Neukölln branch of ‘Gangway’ also attracts attention with its posts. In a post from 2023, the group showcases a graffiti event involving young people. What can be seen there, amongst other things? Spray-painted Palestinian flags.
Palestine flags spray-painted at the graffiti event.
This seems downright absurd given that the Middle East conflict, in particular, holds enormous potential for radicalisation among many young people.
Palestinian and anti-Semitic propaganda make young people particularly susceptible to radical ideas – that is the view of one organisation, the ‘Violence Prevention Network’, led by Thomas Mücke. However, the other organisation of which he is a board member, ‘Gangway’, appears to be fuelling precisely this problem.
Bishop José Mazuelos Pérez. Wikimedia Commons, Conferencia Episcopal Española, CC-BY-SA-2.0
A bishop on the Spanish island of Gran Canaria has defended a nude LGBT-themed art performance in front of the local cathedral, leaving Catholic worshippers temporarily blocked from entering Mass.
On July 26, hundreds of naked participants painted in colors associated with the pro-LGBT “Progress Pride” flag gathered in front of the Cathedral of the Canary Islands in Las Palmas, Spain, for a photographic event by New York artist Spencer Tunick. July 26 was also the day of the city’s patronal feast, but local Bishop José Mazuelos Pérez endorsed the pro-LGBT performance.
“I have no problem,” Mazuelos, who was appointed a bishop in 2009 by Pope Benedict XVI, told El País when asked about the performance outside his residence and cathedral. “When we go to the beach we see naked bodies, don’t we?”
The event, titled “Gran Spectrum,” brought together between 400 and 500 people in Santa Ana Square as part of the Culture & Business Pride 2026 festival, organized by the government of the Canary Islands. The performance aimed to promote “LGBTQIA+ inclusion” through images of nude bodies arranged in public spaces.
Tunick directed the participants from a nearby terrace using a walkie-talkie, instructing them to move into different positions for the photographs. The event took place only a short distance from the cathedral and the episcopal palace, where Mazuelos resides.
The bishop did object, however, to road closures connected with the event, which temporarily prevented the cathedral dean and around a dozen faithful from entering the church for the 10 a.m. Mass celebrating the feast of St. Anne.
Two elderly parishioners, Cita and Evaristo, told El País that they arrived early but were stopped by barriers. “Today is a special day for us,” they said. “When people go to concerts, don’t they arrive early to enjoy them? Well, we want to arrive early to enjoy God.”
Police eventually intervened to open a path for worshippers, who entered the cathedral while participants in the exhibition were still nearby, some of them still undressed.
Tunick said after the event that he considered the performance a success and connected it with LGBT identity and public inclusion. “I am very happy for all the people who came and participated,” he said, describing the gathering as an artistic collaboration involving “the identity of queer people, as well as LGBTQIA+ values, inclusion in art, equality and the simple freedom of being in public and among your neighbors.”
The artist also said the location represented progress for his work. “Any place where naked bodies are accepted and in harmony, without separating them, represents a great step forward towards the future,” Tunick said.
The Las Palmas performance is the latest in a long career of large-scale nude photography projects around the world. Some of his planned projects were canceled or rejected, including attempts in Tenerife, South Korea, and Taiwan. Tunick attributed those failures to what he described as restrictive or “narrow-minded” governments.
In Las Palmas, authorities supported the project by closing parts of the historic center from early morning and allowing participants to prepare away from public view. The location was the same square where Pope Leo XIV met with bishops, priests, deacons, religious, seminarians, and pastoral workers from the Diocese of the Canary Islands on June 11, 2026.
A 15-year-old Syrian boy who repeatedly raped, threatened, and humiliated his 14-year-old girlfriend in Gothenburg, Sweden, has been sentenced to ten months in a closed youth care facility after an appeals court increased his punishment.
The Gothenburg District Court had previously concluded that the offenses carried an adult-equivalent sentence of approximately seven years in prison. Because of the defendant’s age, however, it imposed only one year of youth supervision, effectively allowing him to walk free.
As reported by Göteborgs-Posten, that decision was challenged, and the Court of Appeal has now replaced the non-custodial punishment with ten months in a secure juvenile institution.
The case concerned a campaign of controlling behavior and sexual abuse. The boy reportedly regarded violence and degradation as punishment when he was dissatisfied with the relationship.
Messages presented in the case showed him insulting the girl and arranging meetings with her. In one exchange, he directed her to an old public toilet and told her to walk there.
Prosecutors said he forced the girl to submit to sexual acts at several public locations, including a library and at transport hubs. During one incident, she was ordered to get on all fours and describe herself as his “whore” or his dog.
He also used threats that intimate recordings would be distributed to compel her to perform oral sex. Days later, he forced her to cut off part of her hair before attacking her again at the public transport station in the city.
During that assault, he strangled the girl until she lost consciousness, spat on her, and recorded what happened.
Samnytt reported how the teenage victim had told investigators that the relationship initially appeared normal but gradually became highly controlling. She said the boy told her what clothes she could wear, demanded that she keep her coat closed, and became angry when she spoke to others, smiled, or disobeyed him.
She described being subjected to “various punishments” and said he frequently insulted or blocked her on social media when she upset him, but always returned with demands.
During questioning, cited by Dagens Nyheter, the defendant had accepted that he dictated to her what she could and couldn’t do, saying he would comment on her “style of dress and who you go out with and what time.”
“She should wear full-coverage clothes. I don’t want her to go out and show her body,” he added.
When asked whether he had forced her to keep her coat on and closed during school hours, he replied, “I told her to keep her coat closed. Not forced. I also said I would kill her, which I didn’t do, which shows that nothing was serious.”
The defendant was prosecuted for a series of offenses, including aggravated rape of a child, unlawful coercion, assault, child pornography offenses, exploitation of a child, and violations of a restraining order.
The District Court also ordered him to pay the victim 520,000 Swedish kronor (€47,000) in damages.
On appeal, prosecutors sought a more serious classification for one of the rape convictions and demanded a harsher punishment. The victim also requested that her compensation be increased to 780,000 kronor (€70,500).
The Syrian migrant denied the offenses and asked for the charges and damages claim to be dismissed. The Court of Appeal rejected his account, and set the final punishment at ten months in closed youth care.
You may not have heard of Kate Osborne before, with her blaming Reform UK and GB News for a deadly attack by a Muslim on a Pride march. I sincerely hope you will not be hearing from her again.
Explain to me why it is the Left will blame anybody but followers of Islam for these outrages.
Take Ms Osborne. Please. As you might expect, this MP for Gateshead is a great advocate of trans rights and married to a woman with two children.
On hearing one person was dead and 29 others were injured when Abdul Ballout deliberately used his van to crash into marchers celebrating their sexuality, you would have thought Ms Osborne would be outraged at a religion which clearly hates homosexuality.
Oh no. Not a peep from her about how Islamists are typically at the centre of violence across Europe. Either attacking innocent shoppers, innocent Jews or innocent concertgoers.
She had every opportunity to take to the media and unload on the Muslim terrorist or to ask the question, ‘Why always the Muslims?’
Instead, she chose, having given it some thought, to say it was all the fault of Nigel Farage’s party and the People’s Channel. How do these people get into positions of power with a brain wired like that?
This is what Ms Osborn (who worked for 25 years at the Royal Mail – imagine it was a small leaving party) said in a statement: ‘’To Reform UK and GB News broadcasting content and language that attacks and vilifies the LGBTQ+ community to the attack on Berlin Pride.
‘’We see these patterns emerging across Europe, and escalation of hate, verbal attacks online as a catalyst for physical violence.’’
Isn’t that amazing? Not a word it was a Muslim to blame. Not a word Muslims have thrown their countrymen off buildings because of their sexuality. Not a word. Gays across Muslim countries fear a knock on the door from religious police; in places like Iran, the death penalty and flogging are the norm.
None of that mattered; it was all the fault of Mr Farage and Britain’s News Channel. How mad is this woman? Did the voters of Gateshead realise their representative would rather blame a television station than the murderer?
Ms Osborne is in line with other Lefties. Especially if they are gay themselves. Stonewall talked about “immense sadness” and that “hate and violence are always unacceptable”.
But not once did Stonewall mention the killer was Muslim. If this were a one-off attack, I could understand it. But there is no other religion so steeped in violence as Islam.
Where are the Christian killers? The Jewish killers roaming Europe? The Hindu killers wandering around the Cotswolds.
They do not exist.
Unbelievably, Ms Osborne has been in Parliament since the 2019 election.
She has barely made a ripple. I prefer it that way. A period of silence would be more than welcome.
It should be a requirement from our new Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
Whilst emergency services were still at work at the Berlin CSD, trying to save the lives of Abdul B.’s victims, the Salafist influencer Hanna Hansen had already posted a message on X downplaying the attack and is now blaming the AfD party and Israel.
First, the Salafist quoted the Qur’anic story of Lut/Lot, which also features in a similar form in the biblical Book of Genesis – and has for centuries served as a theological basis for the rejection of homosexuality. Alongside this, she wrote the call to “Turn back”. Homosexuals are thus urged to return to the path of Islam. “The story of Lut is not a story of the past – it is a warning: Return,” said Hansen. “The further people stray from Tawhid, the more they call light darkness and darkness light,” she had stated previously.
In another post, she put the term “terrorist attack” in quotation marks and suggested it might be an “inside job” carried out by the AfD. “The elections are coming up soon, after all,” wrote the self-confessed Salafist. Hansen went on to say that the attack had been staged to fuel “anti-Islamic propaganda”. She also shared a post blaming Israel for the attack. So first the Salafist provided the religious justification for hatred of gay people, then denied the attack had taken place and portrayed herself as the victim of a conspiracy.
Late on Saturday evening, Abdul Ballout, a German citizen of Lebanese origin, drove a white van he had specifically hired into a crowd at Berlin’s CSD. At least one woman was killed. Numerous other people were injured, some seriously. All the other injured are now out of danger. On Sunday evening, a special operations unit (SEK) successfully tracked down Ballout. He had barricaded himself in a garden plot in Berlin-Spandau. During the raid, Ballout opened fire on the officers. Ballout was killed in the ensuing exchange of fire.
Andrea Pirlo, one of the greatest midfielders of his generation and a key figure in Italy’s 2006 World Cup-winning side, has pulled out of the race to become the next head coach of Italy’s national team after a political controversy over his commercial ties with Russia.
“I learned last night that I am no longer a candidate for the bench of the Italian national team,” he wrote on social media on July 27, a day before the Italian Football Federation (FIGC) was due to confirm him.
Pirlo’s path to the Italy bench was disrupted not by questions over his tactical credentials, but by a trip to Moscow. His appearance in Russia on behalf of one of the country’s largest betting companies triggered a political row, with critics arguing that any commercial association with Russia is incompatible with representing Italy while the war in Ukraine continues.
Pirlo, 47, is widely regarded as one of football’s greatest deep-lying playmakers. During a long playing career, he represented Brescia, Inter Milan, AC Milan, Juventus and New York City FC, winning two UEFA Champions League titles with AC Milan and four consecutive Serie A titles with Juventus. He earned 116 caps for Italy, scored 13 international goals and played a pivotal role in the country’s 2006 World Cup triumph in Germany.
After retiring in 2017, Pirlo moved into coaching. In July 2020, he was appointed head coach of Juventus U23, but just nine days later was promoted to lead the club’s first team following Maurizio Sarri’s dismissal. In his only season in charge, he guided Juventus to the Coppa Italia and the Italian Super Cup before leaving in 2021. He then managed Turkish club Fatih Karagümrük, followed by Sampdoria in Italy’s Serie B. Since 2025, he has been head coach of United FC, also known as Dubai United, in the United Arab Emirates. Although his managerial career has yet to match his achievements as a player, his status within Italian football kept him among the country’s most respected coaching candidates.
Following Italy’s latest football crisis, Pirlo quickly emerged as the leading candidate to take over the national team. Italian media reported that newly appointed FIGC technical director Paolo Maldini identified him as his preferred choice after Pep Guardiola declined the job on July 24. A World Cup winner with strong international credentials, Pirlo was widely considered the federation’s first choice, with his appointment expected to be completed soon.
The controversy centres on Pirlo’s commercial partnership with Fonbet, one of Russia’s largest bookmakers. In October 2025, he became a global ambassador for the company and, in May 2026, travelled to Moscow to participate in its “Football Day” celebrations at Luzhniki Stadium ahead of the Russian Cup final.
During the event, Pirlo appeared alongside fellow 2006 World Cup winner Marco Materazzi. Both were among a group of retired Italian internationals, including Francesco Totti, who took part in Fonbet promotional events in Russia. He took part in autograph sessions, media appearances and promotional activities organised by Fonbet for supporters attending the Russian Cup final.
Pirlo has insisted that his involvement arose from his work in the United Arab Emirates and was “exclusively commercial and sporting” in nature, adding that reading a political meaning into it meant attributing to him beliefs he had never expressed.
The explanation did not satisfy critics. Politicians from across Italy’s political spectrum have questioned whether someone maintaining a commercial partnership with a major Russian company should become the public face of Italy’s national football team. On July 25, European Parliament vice-president Pina Picierno criticised the possibility of Pirlo’s appointment, arguing that someone promoting a Russian betting company while Ukraine remains under attack could not credibly represent Italy’s national team.
Criticism also came from Kyiv. Andriy Shevchenko, president of the Ukrainian Association of Football and Pirlo’s former AC Milan team-mate, said he had spoken directly to several of the Italians involved: “I clearly expressed my opposition and Ukraine’s position.”
The controversy has sent the Italian Football Federation back to the drawing board. The nomination was due to be formalised at the federal council meeting on July 28, and Italian media have reported that Maldini and adviser Leonardo, who backed Pirlo, are now weighing their own positions. Roberto Mancini and Antonio Conte have been named among possible replacements, with the federation needing an answer before Italy return to competitive action in the Nations League in September.
A 29-year-old Afghan migrant has been charged with murder and placed in pretrial detention after allegedly stabbing a 65-year-old Chinese woman to death in an apartment used for prostitution in Béthune, northern France.
The victim’s body was discovered on July 13 in a short-term rental apartment in the city center. An autopsy found that she had suffered multiple stab wounds — around 20, according to La Voix du Nord. Investigators believe she was killed on July 11, two days before her body was found.
The suspect was arrested on July 22.
He confessed during police questioning but has not clearly explained why he carried out the attack, prosecutors said, according to Le Figaro. Initial findings indicate that he had been a client of the victim, who authorities believe may have been engaged in prostitution at the apartment.
The Afghan national was legally residing in France and had been granted subsidiary protection by the French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons.
Local authorities reportedly asked the agency to withdraw that protection, arguing that the suspect’s conduct represented a serious threat to public order.
A separate investigation has been opened into alleged aggravated pimping connected to the apartment, which had reportedly been used for prostitution for several years and had previously been linked to violent incidents.
A Chinese man in his forties, suspected of renting the property and profiting from prostitution, has been charged and placed under judicial supervision. Prosecutors had sought his detention and have appealed the judge’s decision to release him under supervision.
Oliwia Olejniczak (Provided to The Gateway Pundit)
A 21-year-old university student, young mother, and pregnant woman has been convicted in Poland for the “crime” of speaking the truth about mass immigration.
On July 16, 2026, the District Court in Zamość found Oliwia Olejniczak guilty of “inciting hatred” and slapped her with a 3,000 PLN fine (roughly $800–$1,000) for remarks she made at a completely legal and peaceful “Stop Immigration” rally on July 19, 2025. She was pregnant with her second child at the time of the verdict.
Her husband, Adam Olejniczak, reached out to The Gateway Pundit with the details of this outrageous free-speech persecution under Donald Tusk’s left-liberal government.
Oliwia, a top physiotherapy student and mother of a one-year-old, took the stage in Zamość, one of roughly a hundred similar demonstrations held across Poland that day, and voiced the fears shared by countless ordinary Poles.
She spoke about the real risks of uncontrolled mass immigration from incompatible cultures: rising crime, violence, and rape already plaguing Western Europe.
Adam Olejniczak wrote to The Gateway Pundit:
“My wife, Oliwia Olejniczak, a 21-year-old university student, young mother, and (at the time of the verdict) pregnant with our second child, was recently convicted and fined ~3,500 PLN (around $1000) simply for speaking out against mass immigration.
On 19 July 2025 she took the stage at a peaceful, legal “Stop Immigration” rally in Zamość — one of roughly a hundred such demonstrations held across Poland that same day. Two days later an investigation was opened. On 16 July 2026 the District Court in Zamość found her guilty of “inciting hatred” and imposed the fine.
Notably, the case was not handled by the local prosecutor’s office in Zamość. Instead it was immediately taken up by the other District Prosecutor’s Office, an office roughly an hour away that is widely known for its ideologically leftist leanings.
They launched proceedings against Oliwia with extraordinary speed. In the Polish justice system such rapid action almost never happens unless the target is someone who has criticized the current left-liberal government.
During her speech she voiced legitimate fears for her own safety and that of our young child. She warned that uncontrolled mass immigration of people from incompatible cultures would bring the same rise in crime, violence and rape already visible in Western Europe.
She said the words “That could have been me, that could have been you,” directly referencing a horrific crime that had occurred only weeks earlier in Toruń: a 24-year-old Polish woman from her home region was brutally murdered by an illegal Venezuelan national who gouged out her eyes so she could not identify him and then killed her.
This fear was not abstract. Not long before the rally, Oliwia had already taken part in protests in our region against the opening of special centers for migrants.
Across Poland, dozens of such facilities were being established where illegal immigrants — many of whom had crossed the eastern border illegally — were to receive assistance and even help legalizing their stay. These centers were part of a broader policy that many ordinary Poles, including my wife, saw as a direct threat to public safety.
Among the emotional lines she spoke were: “I am a mother, I am a Pole. I am afraid for the future of my child. I am simply afraid that some Black man will come when I am out walking with my child and harm us. Do not let Black people and Islamists colonize our beautiful Zamość. Down with immigration!”
After the verdict she stated clearly: “I am simply a mother who wants her child to be able to walk safely on the streets of a Polish city. I just wanted Poland to remain safe. I don’t want to be afraid of evening walks. I don’t want to be afraid of strangers on the street. At the rally many statistics were presented from Western European countries where mass immigration, especially from Africa and Islamic countries, has brought a rise in crime — these are facts, not racism.”
There was no call to violence and no incitement to hatred — only a mother’s public warning about real risks. Yet the court convicted her. In its reasoning the court even treated slogans such as “A Pole is the host in Poland,” “That could have been me,” or “Down with immigration” as racism, incitement to hatred, and psychological manipulation intended to frighten people. This is absurd.
Official statistics from Western Europe clearly show that certain groups of immigrants commit far more crimes per capita than the native population. Pointing out these facts is not hatred — it is reality.
Across Poland, dozens of such facilities were being established where illegal immigrants — many of whom had crossed the eastern border illegally — were to receive assistance and even help legalizing their stay. These centers were part of a broader policy that many ordinary Poles, including my wife, saw as a direct threat to public safety.
Among the emotional lines she spoke were: “I am a mother, I am a Pole. I am afraid for the future of my child. I am simply afraid that some Black man will come when I am out walking with my child and harm us. Do not let Black people and Islamists colonize our beautiful Zamość. Down with immigration!”
After the verdict she stated clearly: “I am simply a mother who wants her child to be able to walk safely on the streets of a Polish city. I just wanted Poland to remain safe. I don’t want to be afraid of evening walks. I don’t want to be afraid of strangers on the street. At the rally many statistics were presented from Western European countries where mass immigration, especially from Africa and Islamic countries, has brought a rise in crime — these are facts, not racism.”
There was no call to violence and no incitement to hatred — only a mother’s public warning about real risks. Yet the court convicted her. In its reasoning the court even treated slogans such as “A Pole is the host in Poland,” “That could have been me,” or “Down with immigration” as racism, incitement to hatred, and psychological manipulation intended to frighten people. This is absurd.
Official statistics from Western Europe clearly show that certain groups of immigrants commit far more crimes per capita than the native population. Pointing out these facts is not hatred — it is reality.
The double standard is glaring: while my wife was swiftly investigated and punished for her words, the Venezuelan murderer still has not received a final sentence more than a year later.
The court imposed this financial penalty knowing our circumstances. We are both full-time physiotherapy students at the university, raising a small child and relying on academic scholarships.
My wife is currently the top physiotherapy student at the entire university; I am second. We work hard because we want to help people through our future profession.
Last year my wife was one of the main organizers of a large charity event that helped a hundred children from orphanages in our region. She also organized the local March for Life and Family. She is a person with an angelic heart — yet the court treated her as if she were some kind of beast inciting hatred.
In addition to the 3,000 PLN fine, the prosecution had demanded 10 months of restriction of liberty for my pregnant wife! This demand alone is an unimaginable absurdity. They also commissioned a linguistic expert opinion that cost approximately 5,000 PLN (about $1,300).
That expert produced an extremely left-wing, politicized report that went far beyond linguistics and even urged the authorities to punish such statements harshly so Poland would not become “anti-democratic, dangerous and backward.”
The court itself completely rejected this opinion as incomplete, non-objective and biased — so we were spared being burdened with those extra thousands of zlotys. Despite discarding the expert’s report, however, the court still adopted essentially the same narrative that the far-left expert had pushed.
Altogether we were looking at a potential cost of around 8,000 PLN (roughly $2,100) plus the threat of 10 months of restricted freedom.
The conviction has no legal foundation under Polish free-speech protections or the European Convention on Human Rights. Ordo Iuris, the respected Christian-conservative legal institute that defends civil liberties, is representing Oliwia and has already announced an appeal demanding full acquittal.
Since the case became public, the harassment has intensified. My wife, myself, and even our young child have become targets of online insults. There have been isolated but very real threats coming from leftist, including some who live in our own city.
Poland was long regarded as one of the most resistant countries in Europe to the woke agenda. Under the current liberal government that resistance is being systematically dismantled.
Citizens who dare to warn about the dangers of mass immigration are now being prosecuted while real violent criminals face far slower justice.”
This is not isolated. It is the same pattern of speech policing and elite double standards we have documented across Europe and increasingly in the United States.
A young Polish mother is punished for protecting her children. The actual killers and the politicians importing the chaos face far less urgency. Free speech is under attack in Poland just as it is elsewhere. The voice of a young mother should never be treated as a crime.
Abdul B, the Lebanese Muslim terrorist who rammed his car into a gay pride parade in Berlin, killing 1 and wounding 16, predictably had a quite extensive track record with the authorities as most of his ilk do.
None of that track record actually kept him behind bars or out of the country.
As bad as our pro-crime justice system is, look at the horrifying situation in Germany that led to this murderous rampage.
Abdul “had been arrested in November 2025 at Berlin Brandenburg Airport (BER) after serving a three-month prison sentence in Lebanon, following unsuccessful attempts to join the terrorist organization Islamic State (IS) in Syria.”
“After a lengthy period of pre-trial detention, he was sentenced on May 12th by a juvenile court at the Tiergarten District Court to 22 months’ imprisonment – among other things for preparing a serious act of violence endangering the state. The decision regarding whether to suspend this sentence on probation was therefore postponed for a period of six months.”
“According to the public prosecutor’s office, searches were carried out at his address in Berlin-Schöneberg at the beginning of this month. The searches were reportedly based on an initial suspicion of a violation of the weapons law. However, only a toy gun was found. According to the newspaper “Bild,” Abdul B. was scheduled to attend a deradicalization course today, Monday.”
I’m sure he would have passed. The good news is he was shot and killed so at least this part of the circus is over.
In a video posted on social media, the suspect appears to be pinned to the ground by several individuals. He seems somewhat disoriented and says: “It was Allah who ordered me to do it.” Speaking to the press, Interior Minister Laurent Nunez said he remained “very cautious about the motive behind this violent act” committed by a man “making incoherent statements.” The suspect provided a self-declared identity that still needs to be verified. According to a source close to the investigation, he has the profile of a “mentally disturbed individual.”
‼️🇫🇷 𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥𝗧𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 — « C’est Allah qui me l’a ordonné » : Une ATTAQUE AU COUTEAU vient d’avoir lieu à Paris, aux alentours de la place de Clichy.
Un individu a poignardé 3 femmes, dont l’une serait enceinte. L’une des victimes est en URGENCE ABSOLUE.
The 1st District of the Paris Judicial Police is in charge of the investigation to determine, in particular, what led to this act. The National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office told us that it is “monitoring the proceedings being conducted by the Paris Public Prosecutor’s Office.”
