CANADA: Transgender Killer Sentenced to Life for Murdering His Mother Allegedly Impregnated Female Inmate Before Being Paroled to Women’s Home

A convicted murderer identifying as “transgender” was transferred to a women’s prison where he allegedly impregnated a female inmate before being released to a halfway house for women. Clayton Jacob Warkentin, who now goes by Natalia Anastasia Warkova, was 19 when he strangled his mother to death in a drug-induced rage before attempting to make the murder resemble a suicide.

In 2018, Warkentin pleaded guilty in a B.C. Supreme Court in Chilliwack to killing his mother two years prior. He was handed a life sentence for second-degree murder charges, while members of his family gave emotional victim impact statements to the court.

“I struggle to trust people, as one of the people I trusted most, my baby brother, killed my mother,” Clayton’s older brother Logan said at the sentencing hearing. “How do I tell my children that their uncle killed their grandmother?”

On the night of the murder, Warkentin is said to have consumed an eight ball of cocaine. As the narcotic wore off, he began to become enraged. He asphyxiated his mother in the bathroom before dragging her body into the garage and tying a noose around her neck.

Warkentin’s motive was said to be related to a demand for money from his 51-year-old mother, Lois Unger, which he intended to use to pay back his drug dealer. While high on cocaine, Warkentin mortally asphyxiated his mother. While he was initially charged with first-degree murder, the charge was reduced to second-degree murder on the agreement that he would plead guilty. Both carry a life sentence, while a second-degree murder conviction stipulates no chance of parole for at least 10 years.

Crown counsel Grant Lindsey described how Warkentin became fixated on body building from the age of 15, and subsequently began abusing steroids and human growth hormone. To counter the effects of the steroids, Warkentin first became addicted to caffeine before escalating to cocaine use.

Witnesses told the court that Warkentin told them he might kill his mother for the insurance money, which indicated a level of planning that led to the initial charge of first-degree murder. However, the court accepted the rationale that such comments were nothing more than a sick joke, in order to allow a plea deal to be made.

Following sentencing in January 2018, Warkentin was sent to Kent in Agassiz to start his life sentence, reports independent writer Paul Henderson. He was subsequently moved to to Pacific Institution in Abbotsford in 2020. Then, in September 2021, he legally changed his name to Natalia Warkova and was relocated to Fraser Valley Institution for Women.

Fraser Valley (FVI) is a multi-level facility for women which includes a minimum security residential-style apartment unit and residential-style small group accommodation houses. There is also a Mother-Child Program at FVI, which takes place in a house comprised of facilities such as a shared kitchen, lounge and bathroom, as well as multiple bedrooms. It is situated within a compound of similar housing units, arranged to look much like a neighborhood.

Several dangerous male convicts have been transferred to FVI after declaring a transgender status, including Canada’s youngest dangerous offender, was handed a rare indeterminate sentence after being convicted of the violent rape of a 3-month-old infant. Adam Laboucan, who calls himself Tara Desousa, was 15 years old when he raped the infant so violently that the boy had to undergo reconstructive surgery.

Warkentin is alleged to have impregnated a female inmate during his stay at FVI. One anonymous source within the Correction Service Canada (CSC) reportedly told Henderson, “You didn’t hear it from me but … ‘she’ now serves at Fraser Valley Institution for Women. And ‘she’ has a 19-year-old girlfriend now, too. We have had sexual assaults, pregnancies, and who knows what else since we became ‘coed.’ I see no coverage of this in the media.”

Another tip came from a woman who had been incarcerated at FVI with Warkentin, who confirmed that he had impregnated a woman while he was held at the women’s institution.

In a 2016 social media post, Clayton Jacob Warkentin stated, “Family means a lot to me.” His tattoos read, “Love it, kill it,” and “family”.

One family member speculated that Warkentin may have been taking advantage of a loophole in order to avoid being a “pretty boy” in a men’s prison. Warkentin’s brother’s step-mother, Theresa Clark-Kampman, told Henderson: “Clayton/Natalia was not having an easy time in Kent being a young, good-looking guy so he found a loophole and said he was a girl and was moved to the female prison in Abbotsford in minimum security.”

Despite being handed a life sentence without parole eligibility for 10 years, Warkentin was released from prison after serving just seven years of his sentence for the murder of his mother.

On February 26, 2025, two days after the ninth anniversary of this horrific murder, “Natalia Warkova” was granted day parole and moved into a halfway house for women in New Westminster.

While at the halfway house, Warkentin was accused of “coordinated assault” and “toxic behavior,” according to parole board records. He had attempted to initiate a relationship with one of the women there, and displayed “escalating… bullying and controlling behavior”.

Warkentin dismissed the allegations by blaming “mean girl behavior” and claimed to have been discriminated against by women based on his “gender identity.” After his parole was revoked in October 2025, Warkentin filed an appeal arguing that the board did not consider the “harm experienced by transwomen in primarily women-identifying spaces,” and stating that “transgender women experience a disproportionate amount of violence, bullying and harm” from women.

In response, the board acknowledged Warkentin’s feelings and preferred identity.

“The Parole Board member confirmed you wished to be addressed by your chosen name, Natalia, and respected your pronouns, as did all participants, throughout the hearing … When asked by the Board about how you were doing prior to your suspension, you read from a written statement in which you described ‘transphobic hate and harassment’ towards yourself and its impact on your release,” the decision reads.

The parole process attracted condemnation from his victim’s family, who noted he appeared to have no remorse during the hearing.

“During the parole hearing, we did not see any remorse from him about murdering this mom, still just making up excuses and saying the drugs made him not remember what he was doing,” Theresa Clark-Kampman said. “Now after only serving nine years he is out free to live his life. Well, we are scared for our lives…. Lois doesn’t get to live her life or watch her grandchildren.”

“It’s sad that we have to now live scared as he might reoffend to be able to go back to [a woman’s] prison,” Clark-Kampman added.

As reported by Reduxx, the Canadian government was recently forced to admit that female inmates have been raped and sexually abused by trans-identified male transfers. The admission was made in a statement of defense submitted in response to an ongoing lawsuit against Correctional Service Canada (CSC) challenging the policy titled Commissioner’s Directive 100: Gender Diverse Offenders. The guidelines detail the CSC’s “commitment to meeting the needs of its gender diverse offender population in ways that respect their human rights and ensure their safety and dignity.”

In a statement of defense filed on August 31, lawyers for the Attorney General defended the practice of housing trans-identified male inmates in the female estate: “A gender-diverse offender’s request to be placed in, or transferred to, an institution that better aligns with their gender identity or expression is determined through an individualized assessment that considers the offender’s risks and needs, CSC’s security and operational requirements, and health and safety considerations for the offender, other inmates, and CSC staff at the receiving institution.”

Included in the statement of defense, surrounded by jargon defending the policy of transferring violent male convicts into women’s prisons, is the admission that two trans-identified male transfers were charged with sexual assault.

A third transfer, the aforementioned convicted infant rapist Adam Laboucan, was also referenced in relation to a situation wherein he assaulted a female inmate, fracturing multiple ribs. After prison guards intervened, the female inmate who had been attacked was punished by being placed in segregation for “inciting” his assault against her. In the statement of defense it is implied that the investigation into the matter was dropped upon the discovery that the assault occurred after the female inmate referred to the convicted pedophile as a “pedophile”.

Despite the official admission of harm, the Attorney General of Canada claims, in a statement of defense, that housing violent male convicts in women’s prisons “does not infringe the rights guaranteed to cisgender women inmates.”

reduxx

Dutch households with a heat pump see energy bills rise the most

Medforth AI

Dutch energy bills are set to rise by about 10 per cent in real terms over the next five years, and the increase would be sharpest for households that have already installed a heat pump.

That is the finding of government-commissioned research summarised in a draft cabinet letter due before ministers on September 11, public broadcaster NOS reported.

A large majority of households would pay €400 to €600 more a year by 2031 than they do now.

Climate and green growth minister Stientje van Veldhoven writes that homes with gas boilers would still have the highest average bill, around €2,800 a year, even though they are often smaller dwellings.

District heating customers would pay about €2,650. Hybrid heat pump homes would move towards almost €2,400.

Homes heated only by a heat pump, and no longer connected to gas, would see bills rise by about 70 per cent. That is the largest percentage increase.

Their average bill in 2031 would still be the lowest of the groups studied, at about €1,200. The researchers therefore still call the investment attractive.

Nevertheless, they had paid thousands of euros to install heat pumps to begin with. Consumer advice body Milieu Centraal puts a typical hybrid system at about €6,200 including installation and an all-electric one at around €12,000, before subsidy.

The main driver is higher grid charges. Grid operators are passing on the cost of expanding a congested electricity network.

Heat pump households use more power, often have solar panels and are due to lose the net-metering scheme that has allowed them to offset surplus generation, when it ends on January 1, 2027.

Fossil fuel pricing, including the EU’s ETS2 emissions trading system for buildings and road transport, due to start in 2028 after a one-year delay, and a green gas blending obligation planned from 2027, also lifts the bill for those who still burn gas.

Separate industry calculations already warned that time- and volume-based grid tariffs planned from 2029 would add hundreds of euros a year for all-electric and hybrid homes, because heat pumps run hardest on winter evenings when the proposed peak charges would apply.

That analysis, by consultancy Common Futures for the Dutch Heat Pump Association, put the extra cost at €505 a year for an all-electric home, €355 of it from the new tariffs. The proposal by grid operators’ association Netbeheer Nederland would set the higher rate between 4pm and 11pm in the winter half of the year.

Successive Dutch governments presented the technology as the standard way off Groningen gas, whose extraction was halted after it triggered earthquakes in the north of the country, and imported fossil fuel.

A government investment subsidy for sustainable energy and energy saving (ISDE) pays part of the purchase and installation cost: About €2,125 for a typical hybrid and €3,025 for an all-electric unit, according to Milieu Centraal. Cheap loans through the National Heat Fund were marketed on the same promise.

New-build rules already push all-electric or hybrid systems.

In 2022 the cabinet of then prime minister Mark Rutte planned to make a hybrid heat pump the minimum when a boiler was replaced from 2026, with exceptions only for unsuitable homes or a heat network connection. That national mandate was dropped by the subsequent government of Dick Schoof in October 2024.

The current coalition, led by Prime Minister Rob Jetten, still wants hybrid and smart heat pumps stimulated and, from 2029, made the required standard where a heat network is not the better option. Municipalities are due to gain more power from 2027 to take neighbourhoods off gas.

Campaigns from Milieu Centraal, the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO) and energy companies repeated the same message.

A heat pump cuts gas use and, on today’s tariffs, usually lowers the annual bill. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) counted 2.6 million heat pumps at the end of 2024, though almost three-quarters were air-to-air units, better known as air conditioners. It found 8.6 per cent of homes were heated mainly by electricity, largely through heat pumps.

Van Veldhoven says the projected rise does not run far ahead of expected savings and income growth, and that grid investment reduces dependence on foreign oil and gas. The letter notes that the recent Middle East conflict has already added about €4 billion to Dutch oil and gas costs.

brusselssignal

September 11. 2001

by Robin M. Itzler

September 11, 2001, was just an ordinary Tuesday. That morning at around 8:30 a.m. on the East Coast, most people were either at work or on their commute. Kids were settling in at school.

Whether the TV or radio news was background chatter or the focus, suddenly there were interruptions announcing that at 8:46 a.m. an American Airlines Boeing 767 (with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel) had crashed into New York City’s World Trade Center’s North Tower. The jet hit between the 93rd and 99th floors of the 110-story skyscraper. Hundreds of people were instantly killed, and others were trapped on the higher floors with no way to escape.

Most people immediately assumed it was a terrible accident, and they continued with their day while listening for news updates.

However, 17 minutes later, at 9:03 a.m. United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower between the 77th and 85th floors.

Americans immediately knew that the United States was under attack, with many correctly guessing who had attacked us.

This was not the first time the World Trade Center had been attacked by Muslim terrorists. On February 26, 1993, terrorists targeted the World Trade Center. A truck bomb exploded in the North Tower’s underground parking structure, killing six people and injuring more than 1,000.

(In October 2025, then mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani visited Masjid At-Taqwa, a mosque in Brooklyn. The smiling Mamdani had his photo taken with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, whom federal prosecutors once named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Is anyone surprised?)

While the world focused on the World Trade Center in Manhattan, American Airlines Flight 77 was circling Arlington, Virginia, which is near Washington, D.C. At 9:37 a.m., the jet crashed into the west side of the Pentagon.

A few minutes later at 9:45 a.m., the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officially ordered a complete shutdown of U.S. airspace and commanded all airborne planes to land immediately at the nearest airport.

At 9:59 a.m., the South Tower collapsed.

At 10:28 a.m., the North Tower collapsed. A small group (14 to 18 people) miraculously survived. They were with several New York firefighters in the North Tower’s Stairwell B, which somehow remained intact when the tower fell. Hours later, everyone was pulled from the debris.

Most of the world was glued to their television, radio, social media, and phones. For the United States of America, there will always be a ‘before 9/11’ and ‘after 9/11’ view of the world.

President George W. Bush, who was in Florida when the strikes started, had been shuttled to various locations for protection while in contact with government agents about the unfolding events. By 7 p.m., he was back at the White House. At 8:30 p.m., President Bush addressed the American people and the entire world from the Oval Office. Sitting at the Resolute Desk, he said:

“Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.”

In the days and weeks following the attack, New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani (at the time called “America’s Mayor” for his outstanding post 9/11 leadership) told the American people:

“The attacks of September 11th were intended to break our spirit. Instead, we have emerged stronger and more unified. We feel renewed devotion to the principles of political, economic, and religious freedom, the rule of law and respect for human life. We are more determined than ever to live our lives in freedom.”

On September 11, 2026, Americans will commemorate the horrific day when Muslims attacked the United States of America, killing 2,977 innocent people of all races and faiths. Thousands more who had spent weeks digging out the remains of the World Trade Center in the aftermath (and trying to find pieces of bodies) developed illnesses related to 9/11. Many lived with chronic respiratory diseases and died prematurely. More than 100 search and rescue dogs that were deployed to help find survivors in the rubble of the towers also suffered from medical ailments in the years following their service.

About 40 percent of the World Trade Center victims have been identified. It might have been from jewelry or body parts. Only 261 intact bodies were found. While workers were going through the debris, they found 65,000 items, including 437 watches and 144 wedding rings.

Twenty-five years later, there are many people, organizations, and governments (including many in our own country) that refuse to speak the truth as to who committed the terrorist acts on September 11, 2001. As communist Minnesota representative Ilhan Omar once said, “Some people did something.”

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) asked that the word “terrorist” not be used in conjunction with the 9/11 Muslim terrorist attacks. Former Governor George E. Pataki responded on X to that request:

“I was Governor of New York on September 11, 2001.

The planes did not simply crash into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. They were hijacked and deliberately flown into those buildings by Islamist terrorists.

The CBC’s refusal to call September 11 a terrorist attack is political correctness masquerading as journalism. Fear of being accused of Islamophobia cannot become an excuse for denying the plain truth. This is a shameful failure of moral courage.

Truth matters in a free society. Sanitizing September 11 dishonors the nearly 3,000 people who were murdered, the first responders who ran toward danger, and every family that still carries the pain of that day.

No institution should be afraid to tell the truth.”

At this year’s 25th anniversary Memorial Ceremony in Manhattan, families of the victims will gather on the plaza at the Memorial & Museum. They will read aloud the names of the 2,983 people killed in the 2001 attacks and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

A quarter-century ago, the United States was attacked by Islamist terrorists who used planes as their weapons. Today many believe Islamists are attacking the United States with ballots. What do you think?

americanthinker

Denmark: Man with ‘Arabic-sounding name’ raped mother next to her 4-year-old child;  the defendant telling her she had to obey him according to Islam

Illustration. Medforth AI

A 40-year-old man with an Arabic-sounding name is on trial this week at Glostrup District Court in Denmark on charges of rape, prolonged physical abuse, and death threats.

According to the indictment, there are two female complainants. One is the defendant’s long-term cohabitant, who says she was raped over the course of nine years, including next to her 4-year-old child while the child was in the bed. The other is a woman he is accused of picking up while working as a taxi driver, driving to a deserted location and raping her despite the victim telling him “no” and telling him repeatedly to stop.

Prosecutors from Copenhagen’s Vestegn Police say the alleged offenses took place on the western outskirts of Copenhagen and around Brøndby Strand between March 2016 and May 2025.

The prosecutors allege the woman who lived with the defendant was subjected to repeated rapes over nine years, accompanied by violence and threats. They say she was told she had to obey him, according to Islam.

The indictment describes her crying, trying to get away, being held down and repeatedly telling him, “No.” One count concerns the night of Nov. 19-20, 2025, when the alleged rape occurred in the same bed where her 4-year-old child was sleeping. It remains unclear whether the defendant is also the father of the child.

The man also faces charges of assaulting the cohabitant throughout the same period. Police say the violence included blows, kicks, hair-pulling, spitting, and throwing objects.

In some incidents, the defendant used wires and a knife to inflict harm, while in another incident, he threw an object, which resulted in the woman fracturing her wrist. Additional counts allege psychological control: she was not allowed to go out in public alone, drive a vehicle, see female friends, or hold a job. She also routinely received death threats.

Second rape allegation involves drunk taxi passenger

The second alleged rape is dated to Feb. 14, 2026, between 3:40 a.m. and 5:00 a.m.

Prosecutors say that when the defendant targeted her, the female victim was under the influence of alcohol and unable to resist or even know exactly where she was. The defendant allegedly drove her to a deserted area while working as a taxi driver and raped her.

The defendant has been in pre-trial custody at Vestre Fængsel. Prosecutors have asked for a permanent deportation order if he is convicted. A court-imposed name ban prevents publication of his identity.

Defense lawyer Millemaxine Isolde Cornelia Albrektsen told Presse-Fotos.dk that her client denies all of the allegations.

“In addition, I do not want to go into details. The information will come out in court,” she said.

The court trial began on Sept. 7 and a verdict is expected later this month.

rmx

Cardinal Müller warns: ‘Muslims do not respect weak Christianity’

Cardinal Gerhard Müller.Elke Wetzig, CC-BY-SA-4.0, Wikimedia Commons

Cardinal Gerhard Müller warned that Islam is advancing while the Christian West collapses from within and that “Muslims do not respect a weak Christianity that is ashamed of the Cross and reduces itself to a charity organization or an environmental watchdog.”

The line comes from a 2026 address prepared for the “Tavole di Assisi,” organized by Italian senator Simone Pillon, and was published by Michael Haynes in The Catholic Herald, which said that it had received a copy of the talk.

According to the Herald, Cardinal Müller described “an unprecedented identity crisis” in formally Christian nations, stating they are being attacked from outside and eaten away from inside. “The Christian West is no longer merely threatened by external forces, but is being eroded by an internal apostasy,” the German cardinal warned.

“We are witnessing the triumph of post-humanism: a nihilistic ideology that, in its attempt to emancipate humanity from God, ends up destroying humanity itself, reducing it to manipulable matter, to an algorithm among algorithms, and depriving it of its dignity as the image and likeness of the Creator,” he said.

St. Francis and Islam

Within the growing vacuum of this loss of Christian faith is introduced a “vigorous expansion of Islam” as a potential supplanting and heretical belief system.

Unlike the “secularised West,” he said, Islam is “not ashamed of God, is not ashamed of transcendence, but proposes an anthropology and a revelation radically different from those of Christianity.”

He centered the speech on St. Francis of Assisi’s meeting with Sultan Malek al-Kamil during the Fifth Crusade. A “sentimental and relativist trend,” he said, has recast St. Francis as “a precursor of modern syncretism, a prophet of pacifist dialogue as an end in itself, where all religions are equivalent and none possesses the truth.”

That image, Cardinal Müller told the Assisi gathering, is “a historical and theological falsification.” St. Francis did not go “to launch a diplomatic salon or to confirm the Sultan in his faith.” He went from “love for souls and by the unshakable certainty that Jesus Christ is the only Savior of mankind.”

Dialogue that hides Christian identity is not respect, he said: “Interreligious dialogue, if it is to be authentic and respectful of human dignity, cannot be based on disguising one’s own identity.”

Muslims, he added, “respect those who believe. St. Francis showed respect for the Sultan precisely because he spoke to him with the parrhesia of the Holy Spirit, offering his own life as a witness.”

The West must recover its faith, ‘proclaim Christ’s social kingship,’ outside Whom ‘there is no salvation’

Cardinal Müller identified a deeper cause to his diagnosis, arguing that “the West has lost its faith because it has lost its reason.” In the resulting “spiritual void,” and amid attempts to “redefine human nature, marriage, life, and death,” Islam can look “as a solid rock.”

The former prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith affirmed these dangers, stating the answer is not this creed that “separates faith from reason, or that conceives of divine omnipotence as pure arbitrariness.” But rather the West must “rediscover the courage of mission” and “proclaim Christ’s social kingship” by affirming that “outside of Jesus Christ there is no salvation.”

European Union built on the foundation of Christianity

The Assisi remarks fit a series of earlier interventions in which Cardinal Müller treated unbelief, migration, and ascendant Islam as one crisis.

In June of this year, speaking at the Rome conference, he said that Christianity “supplied the moral underpinnings of treasured ideals such as human dignity, conscience, freedom and equality,” emphasizing that “on this foundation stands today the EU.”

Cut from the Gospel, Europe would “suicidally give itself over to its downfall”

In a May essay, the cardinal defined the West as “the cultural community of the Germanic and Slavic tribes and nations, which emerged from the legacy of the Western Roman Empire and are united in their faith in Christ, the Son of God and universal Savior of humanity.”

“Thus,” he wrote, “Europe is Christianity,” and apart from this definition it “loses its formative soul and becomes a lifeless body that, like an ownerless territory, falls into the hands of the nearest and strongest neighbor.”

‘Globalists’ weaponizing mass migration to destroy national identity

Finally, he warned in an exclusive December 2023 interview with LifeSiteNews that globalists are weaponizing mass migration in order to destroy the national identity of Christian nations, rather than aid the poor.

“Mass immigration is not about helping people but about destroying national identity,” Cardinal Müller said at the time. “They say that national identity is nationalism, which has caused all the wars, so they say they are against nationalism, but they are really against the nation.”

“If nationalism is the reason for wars, we must ask who is financing the wars and what interests are behind it.”

“They want everyone to be completely isolated and not connected by language, culture, family ties, or a native land where you feel at home,” he continued.

“They want to destroy all that. They want everyone to be atomized, without cultural and religious roots and identity,” he concluded.

lifesitenews

The Invasion of Britain: The UK No Longer Belongs to Its Own People

Medforth AI

“Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith,” Winston Churchill wrote of Islam in the late 1890s when he was still a young man.

“It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science — the science against which it had vainly struggled — the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

It now reads like a prophecy about the current fate of the country he led. Britain is falling – hard. Worse, the British government appears to be facilitating its fall.

Instead of firmly closing Britain’s borders and turning away more immigrants, on August 19, 2026, the Home Office published a nine-page booklet, “Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: a guide for asylum seekers.” This brochure explains to newly arrived illegals that rape and sex with children are serious crimes in Britain and that engaging in both “could affect your asylum claim.” The question that so many Brits are presumably asking themselves these days is not only why the British government thinks it a good idea to allow continued illegal immigration into the country, but why men from the third world in particular, who think raping women and children is normal, should be allowed to set foot on British soil at all.

Since 2018, around 200,000 illegal immigrants in small boats have arrived in the UK. The majority of these illegals have been allowed to stay in Britain, with just 4% (around 9,000) of them being deported. The majority of the migrants come from Eritrea, Sudan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Iran. Seventy-five percent of arrivals are men.

Illegals, however, make up just a fraction of the collective immigration into the UK: According to the latest statistics:

“In 2021/22, there were: 10.7 million people… living in the UK who were born abroad (16% of the total population). Of these… 6.8 million (10% of the population) were born outside the EU. A more recent ad hoc estimate by the ONS suggests that, as of June 2024, around 13.1 million people living in the UK were born overseas, including… 9.2 million born outside the EU. This was equivalent to around 19% of the UK population. which has led to at least 13 million foreign born residents living in Britain today, an increase of roughly 2.4 million people since 2021/22.”

That is an extraordinary amount of mainly third world immigrants, mostly male, in just a few years.

Not only is the British government failing to deport these illegal immigrants; it is currently moving them out of the hotels where they have been staying until now and into small towns and villages across the country, where the men may have absolutely nothing to do. The tiny village of Piddington – population 350 people – is about to receive 1,250 male illegal immigrants, who will be housed at a local former military base. The village’s inhabitants, who are terrified, are saying they will declare independence and have called on US President Donald Trump to support them.

They have every reason to fear this influx. The results of Britain’s changing demographics are available for all to see. In the working-class communities, where immigrants have historically moved, Britons such as Tommy Robinson were vilified and treated as enemies of the state for pointing out a few hair-raising facts, such as the increasing criminalization of free speech, out-of-control censorship and the mind-numbing number of rapes and other sexual attacks by asylum seekers in Britain (such as here, here, here, here and here). In 2002-03 there were approximately 16,400 police-recorded rape offenses, a number that has reached a peak of about 71,000–74,700 as of July 2026. And these are just the ones that are reported.

Now the turn has come for the rest of Britain to shoulder the consequences of open borders. Allison Pearson, a journalist for The Telegraph, recently described Britain as no longer safe for women and children, ruled by a government that simply does not care. “Scarcely a day passes without learning of some unbearable new abomination,” she wrote, referring to the skyrocketing rates of rape and other sexual attacks in Britain by asylum seekers, adding:

“There is no longer any room for doubt that violent and sexual attacks on British women, girls and children by illegal migrants and other men from misogynist cultures are shrugged off as collateral damage by a Government that refuses, for reasons of political expediency and ideological preference, to protect them.”

Among the most recent abominations:

  • Two Afghan illegal migrants were found guilty of attacking a couple on a first date in a London park with the men taking turns raping the woman while holding a knife to her date’s throat.
  • A Syrian teenager was jailed after raping a woman in a public toilet on Bournemouth beachfront.
  • An Eritrean man, Bruke Desalagne, was found guilty of raping a male pensioner outside a church.
  • Cab driver Abdul Farid Nabizada, a former military translator from Afghanistan, was jailed for abducting and raping a teenage passenger.

The British government, however, does not want the public to know how many rapists are foreigners: Although the government was ordered to release statistics with offenders’ nationalities, the government is fighting that ruling.

The invasion of Britain is happening at multiple levels. Birmingham’s city council is seeking a court injunction to ban activists from the “Raise the Colours” campaign – a patriotic movement of British pride – and others from flying British and English flags from lampposts in the city citing “public safety.” They want people who defy such a potential order to go to prison. As outlandish as this sounds, they are likely to be successful: Oxfordshire sought an injunction against the flying of St George’s Crosses and Union Flags in June. At the time, a council spokesman said:

“Residents across Oxfordshire, from Adderbury to Wallingford, have complained to the council about safety risks, intimidation and distress linked to this activity. The ongoing scale and persistence of the behaviour by Raise the Colours has created safety risks, caused distress within communities, and led to abuse and intimidation directed at council teams and residents.”

A judge granted the injunction banning the flags and anyone breaching it will face fines or imprisonment.

Fly your own flag in your own country and you will be fined and sent to prison. The UK no longer belongs to its own people.

In other news, since 2023, MI5, MI6 and the Government Communications Headquarters (Britain’s “intelligence, security and cyber agency”) have been running a Summer Intelligence Internship, a sort of recruitment effort from which white people are explicitly excluded to “increase diversity within our organisations”:

“For the 2026/27 academic year, if you’re in your final or penultimate year of university, from a Black, Asian, mixed heritage or ethnic minority background and from a socially or economically disadvantaged background, this internship will help you discover if a career in intelligence is right for you. We’re confining the applications for this internship to those within this demographic due to a current underrepresentation in our workforce.”

The authorities are not even hiding it anymore: Safeguarding Britain from threats is not even on the agenda. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion is, and who cares whether those who apply are even right for the job?

gatestoneinstitute

Hamas terrorists praise Ed Miliband over sanctions on Israel but tell Labour ‘they’re not enough’

Ed Miliband. Wikimedia Commons, UKinUSA, CC-BY-SA-4.0

Hamas has welcomed the sanctions imposed on Israel by Ed Miliband and described the Foreign Secretary’s description of “ethnic cleansing” as a positive development.

The proscribed terrorist organisation, responsible for the October 7 attacks that killed 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, also demanded that Israeli leaders face war crimes prosecution.

Basem Naim, a senior figure in Hamas’s political bureau, said: “The imposition of sanctions by Britain and other European countries and Canada on goods imported from the settlements of the occupied West Bank, and the London foreign minister’s use of the term ‘ethnic cleansing’ to describe the crimes of the settlers, are important steps in the right direction but they are not enough.”

Mr Naim also demanded “the prosecution of war criminals in Israel in a manner similar to the Nazi trials at Nuremberg in Germany”.

Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Miliband declared the occupation of Palestinian territory “unlawful” and accused Israel of undermining the viability of a two-state solution.

He told MPs: “The British Government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists.

“And all too often, the Israeli Government has turned a blind eye to this.”

The Foreign Secretary, who stated he remained a proud Jew as he unveiled the measures, announced that Britain would target companies and individuals providing financial, infrastructure, property or construction support to the settlements.

The UK will also block all weapons export licences for arms deemed to “materially contribute to the occupation”.

Israel responded by denouncing what it termed “outrageous lies” from Mr Miliband and swiftly enacted a series of retaliatory measures against Britain.

The Israeli Government has ordered the closure of the UK’s consulate in East Jerusalem and expelled British diplomats from the country.

Israel also imposed entry bans on 11 left-wing MPs, among them Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott.

Israel’s finance ministry indicated it was exploring ways to cushion the economic blow, pledging more than £48million in grants to West Bank farmers affected by the sanctions.

A senior ministry official told the Israel Hayom newspaper: “It’s too early to tell the total impact of the sanctions, because we’re currently in only the declarative stage, which leaves time to negotiate.”

Eight Middle Eastern and majority-Muslim nations voiced their backing for Britain’s decision.

Foreign ministers from Qatar, Turkey, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — the latter a longstanding Israeli ally — issued a joint statement welcoming the move “to ban the import of goods from illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”.

Iran also appeared to view the sanctions favourably, with the country’s state broadcaster running the story under the headline: “Britain gives in to taking a hard line against the Israeli regime.”

Meanwhile, Israeli officials signalled their intention to contain the scope of the measures through diplomacy, hoping to restrict them to direct settlement exports and shield the banking sector from potential blacklisting over inadvertent links to sanctioned entities.

Ameer Kotecha, who led on Palestinian affairs while working in the British Embassy in Tel Aviv, also warned Labour’s sanctions risk backfiring on the people of Gaza.

He said: “The consulate is basically the place coordinating all of our humanitarian and aid efforts for Gaza.

“There is a very real argument here that this is going to harm the ordinary Gazans that the average British person wants to support and assist.”

Mr Kotecha added that there is likely to be “huge amounts of scrambling going on” to continue such programmes.

Settler attacks in the West Bank topped 1,000 this year, data compiled by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has revealed.

The attacks spanned across 230 communities at an average of six incidents a day – the highest rate on record – and have displaced 2,200 Palestinians.

gbnews

Spain’s Pedro Sanchez: Illegal Migrants Invading Ceuta are Innocents Just ‘Seeking a Better Life’

Translation: The Greens don’t care if those barbarians in Ceuta kill me Riposte Laique

Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez claimed on Wednesday the thousands of illegal migrants that swarmed their way into Ceuta are not invaders, but rather innocent people “seeking a better life.”

Sánchez spoke about several subjects with the public broadcaster RTVE —  marking his first television interview since the late July mass migrant invasion of the Spanish North African exclave by tens of thousands of migrants.

On the subject of the invasion of Ceuta, the socialist leader referred to recent statements issued by the leader of the center-right People’s Party, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, who affirmed this week he would have invoked Article 8 of the Spanish constitution to deploy the nation’s Armed Forces in response to the invasion and to ensure the territorial sovereignty of Spain.

According to Sánchez, such actions would constitute a “barbarity,” and affirmed that Núñez Feijóo was suggesting to give an “armed response” to the crisis.

“First of all, because we’re not talking about invaders, we’re talking about people who, for the most part, are seeking a better life, opportunities they don’t have on the other side of the border,” Sánchez said.

The socialist Prime Minister published a clip of his statements on social media, affirming once again that “We are not talking about invaders. We are talking about people seeking a better life.”

“If the solution from the Popular Party and Vox is an armed response, we would be facing a greater crisis and a lamentable international image of Spain,” Sánchez wrote.

In the same interview, Sánchez defended the Spanish law enforcement’s response during the invasion and affirmed that it was “more intelligent” to allow the massive amount of migrants into the city so that “90 percent” of them would leave in the following hours or days.

Sánchez claimed that “over 4,500” of the remaining invading migrants have voluntary departed from Ceuta since August 10, affirming that the government is currently screening and relocating migrants so that “where appropriate, they can be returned to Morocco, or so that those who are eligible for asylum can be granted it.”

Per RTVE, Sánchez said that his government must better prepare to deal with “hybrid attacks of this nature”  affirmed that Ceuta, alongside with Melilla, must be “prepared for the structural reality, an inequality in income per capita” with neighboring Morocco. The Prime Minister argued that Spain must invest more on infrastructure for “the arriving migrants.”

The leader of the anti-mass-migration Vox party Santiago Abascal condemned Sánchez over his remarks in a social media post.

“He [Sánchez] will steal the money from railway maintenance, from hospitals, and whatever is allocated to education will be for halal menus,” Abascal wrote. “The traitor wants Spaniards to pay for the invasion.”

The prime minister’s interview occurred right as the Spanish government declassified a series of reports on the Ceuta invasion. Sánchez had previously announced the declassification last week when he spoke before Congress and insisted that Morocco was behind the invasion of Ceuta, despite new police reports suggesting otherwise.

Contrary to past assertions from Spanish government officials, the declassified reports confirm that Spanish intelligence and law enforcement agencies had duly warned the government of the then-impending invasion, warning of a “massive” event for late July — which ended up occurring.

breitbart

Germany: Top CDU Politician Floats Banning AfD Days After Its Landslide Win

Barely after the ballots were counted in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany’s political establishment began discussing possible legal action against the election winner.

After the AfD captured 43.8% of the vote, senior CDU politician Hendrik Wüst called for the first structured federal-state examination that could eventually open the door to a party-ban proceeding, the German press reports.

The move comes at an extraordinary moment. Voters handed the AfD its strongest result in the state’s history while Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s CDU crashed to just 17.2%, leaving Germany’s governing conservatives facing uncomfortable questions about why so many voters have walked away.

Instead of brushing aside the ban debate, Wüst wants to formalize it. The North Rhine-Westphalia premier has proposed a working group bringing together federal and state officials, constitutional lawyers, intelligence authorities and other experts to examine the AfD and possible legal consequences.

Wüst insists the outcome mustn’t be decided beforehand. The group, he says, could recommend a prohibition proceeding, some other legal response or ultimately something short of either.

Even so, the timing has poured gas on an increasingly heated argument. A party that had just received the backing of nearly 44% of Saxony-Anhalt voters now finds itself at the center of renewed discussions over whether Germany’s institutions should explore removing it from electoral politics altogether.

Wüst says constitutional protection, not electoral arithmetic, should determine the issue. If investigators conclude that the legal conditions for banning the AfD have been satisfied, he argues, Germany’s constitutional institutions would have a duty to pursue the matter.

That radical position places Wüst on a different track from Merz. Although the chancellor remains one of the AfD’s fiercest political opponents, he has expressed skepticism about prohibition and argues that Germany’s established parties need to defeat the AfD politically rather than imagine that a court proceeding will make its voters disappear.

The election numbers explain why the argument has become so explosive. The AfD, as The Gateway Pundit previously reported, finished with 43.8% and 39 of the state parliament’s 83 seats, putting it only three seats away from governing with an outright majority.

The CDU suffered the opposite fate. Its support fell to 17.2%, less than half the AfD result, in a state where the Christian Democrats had been the dominant governing force for more than two decades.

Merz entered the CDU leadership promising to shrink the AfD’s support, yet Saxony-Anhalt delivered the opposite: the AfD surged while his own party collapsed.

Migration featured prominently in the AfD campaign, alongside economic frustration and dissatisfaction with Berlin. The party has demanded substantially tougher border enforcement and deportation policies, presenting itself as the alternative to years of migration policies supported, in varying forms, by Germany’s traditional governing parties.

The AfD says the election proves those positions have moved well beyond the political fringe.

Germany’s constitutional rules make an outright prohibition deliberately difficult. Politicians can’t simply vote the AfD out of existence: only the Federal Constitutional Court can ban a political party after proceedings initiated by the Bundestag, Bundesrat or federal government.

That hasn’t stopped the issue from returning whenever the AfD gains ground. This time, however, the debate follows an election in which almost 44 out of every 100 participating voters in Saxony-Anhalt chose the party.

And that fact is causing unease even among politicians who want nothing to do with the AfD. Bavarian Premier Markus Söder, whose CSU governs nationally alongside Merz’s CDU, has pushed back strongly against the idea that a ban offers Germany a way out of its political predicament.

Söder warns that such a proceeding would be constitutionally difficult, could consume years and might hand the AfD the status of a political martyr. More pointedly, he said sending a signal that nearly 44% of voters were effectively being associated with unconstitutional politics would be a serious mistake.

Trending: Peter Navarro Drops Truth Bomb on Greg Kelly Show — Shares What Actually Happened on Maria Bartiromo’s Fox News Exit (VIDEO)

His proposed alternative is considerably simpler: fight elections and win voters back. Söder argues that democratic parties should develop clearer arguments and prepare better for the next contest rather than expect constitutional litigation to solve an electoral problem.

Wüst, for his part, sees greater urgency. He has warned against assuming the AfD would moderate once in government, pointing to the considerable powers held by Germany’s states, including influence over senior appointments involving police and the judicial system.

The AfD has hit back hard at the renewed ban discussion. Deputy federal leader Stefan Möller accused political opponents of responding to the Saxony-Anhalt result with efforts aimed at preserving their own power, while rejecting Merz’s attacks on the party’s migration agenda.

Behind all the legal arguments sits a political question that no court can answer for the CDU: why did so many voters abandon it? Saxony-Anhalt wasn’t a narrow AfD victory that could be dismissed as an electoral fluke; the party finished more than 26 percentage points ahead of Merz’s Christian Democrats.

Germany now faces two competing approaches to the AfD’s rise. Wüst wants the state to examine whether constitutional measures should form part of the response, while Söder and Merz maintain that the fundamental battle must remain political and electoral.

thegatewaypundit

Belgian defence minister says anti-terror law could be used against communist festival

Theo Francken. Wikimedia Commons, Arno Mikkor, Aron Urb, CC-BY-2.0

Belgian defence minister Theo Francken has said the country’s new offence of glorifying terrorism could be applied to foreign speakers booked for ManiFiesta, the annual festival of the Marxist Workers’ Party of Belgium (PVDA/PTB), due in Ostend this weekend.

Belgium’s revised penal code entered into force on September 1, replacing the one from 1876. It makes public praise of terrorist offences, and public support for terrorist organisations, a criminal matter for the courts.

Francken, of the centre-right N-VA, wrote that the provision could now be used against what he called “the commie festival of Jew-hatred Manifiesta”, tagging interior minister Bernard Quintin.

The immediate trigger was the announced appearance of Hasan Piker, a controversial “shock-jock”American online commentator with a large following, has a record of remarks that critics call antisemitic and an apology for political violence.

He claimed that “America deserved 9/11” due to its history of foreign interventionism. He frequently states that Israel is “a thousand times worse than Hamas” and has explicitly stated that he would vote for Hamas over Israel.

Piker has used his platform to label Zionism a “mental illness” and has frequently directed aggressive rhetoric toward both Israeli citizens and American Jewish lawmakers who align with Israel.

He openly expresses admiration for communist authoritarians like Mao Zedong, responsible for millions of deaths, and has famously worn a Mao jacket to public speaking events

Likewise, French rapper Médine Zaouiche (known simply as Médine) has a long and highly publicised history of alleged antisemitism and calls for violence.

In August 2023, Médine sparked nationwide outrage after targeting essayist Rachel Khan. Khan is Jewish and the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors who were deported by the Nazis.

The rapper engaged in questionable wordplay regarding her deported grandparents, causing outrage in France.

In an older song titled MC Soraal, Médine sings about “the commerce of the Holocaust”. In the past, he has also made an insulting “quenelle” gesture together with the anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonné.

The billed programme also includes former Colombian president Gustavo Petro, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Die Linke co-chair Ines Schwerdtner, Belgian union leaders, writer Tom Lanoye, Syrian singer Omar Souleyman and Palestinian clarinettist Ahmed Hawwash.

PVDA secretary-general Peter Mertens called Francken’s claims half-truths and said democrats should worry when a defence minister appears to threaten a festival because he dislikes its message.

ManiFiesta, he said, was a solidarity gathering of thousands of international guests; the government wanted to discredit social movements rather than answer them.

Mertens accused the defence minister of wanting to silence a political opponent.

Francken replied he had not called for the event to be banned or for PVDA politicians to be prosecuted.

Application of the law, he added, “belongs exclusively to the independent judiciary”.

“The law is the law. It was adopted by parliament and passed every democratic check and balance.”

Accusations that Francken was threatening the opposition were “framing that exists only in the imagination of the left”.

“If the PVDA feels this applies to it, there’s a simple reason for that. Apparently, it likes to hear these messages.” He added that if the communists, “with Hasan’s help, glorify Hamas and incite their comrades against Jews, then they’ve got a big problem”.

ManiFiesta is a long-running left-wing political and cultural weekend organised around the PVDA.

Francken has for months argued that far-left networks in Belgium have grown more organised and more violent, citing security-service assessments and linking some militant protest scenes to the communist party’s orbit, a charge the PVDA rejects.

The festival is scheduled for this weekend.

brusselssignal