Allah's Willing Executioners

Not much tends to happen down my way. A rural community, with pubs older than the United States, we have traditionally slept the deep, deep sleep of England. Aside from the ubiquitous war memorial—currently dusted with snow—it bears little mark of the wider world, save for the names of those who left here and never returned. 

But such are the extraordinary times in which we live that even here, the culture wars arrived in 2025. Imagine my pleasant surprise when St. George flags and Union Jacks appeared, one sunny autumn morning, on virtually every lamp post down the local high street (one of which is pictured below). We had all seen the organic and viral proliferation of the ‘Raise the Colours’ movement in towns and cities across the country in response to crimes committed against women and girls, largely by migrants. But flag raising was something that happened elsewhere, not in our little backwater. 

Our area is almost exclusively ethnically white (aside from the small, but increasing, number of foreign workers employed by the local NHS), and many of the residents are comfortably middle class. They have chiefly moved up from London because—irony of ironies—they’d rather not bring up their children in that vibrant, multicultural Eden. Luckily for them, they were wealthy enough to leave and watch its decline from afar.

These people have also brought their bourgeois lifestyle with them. Artisan bakeries, coffee shops and art galleries now sit where agricultural suppliers, butcher’s shops and garages used to be. Windmills and watermills have long since been converted into homes, as has almost every barn. Buildings that were once healthily weathered and which displayed the evidence of proud labour are now painfully twee and wouldn’t look out of place on a Christmas card. Many have painted their houses a lovely shade of pink, completely unaware that, until recently, it was a mixture of limewash and pig’s blood that would have given them that colour.

But the arrival of the flags in our village, and the consequent realisation that the working-class people among them might actually have the gall to care about what happens to the country they love, caused those same white-collar professionals to choke on their cinnamon lattes. You could sense the meetings going on behind their closed, imitation-mediaeval doors. After a tension-filled week of unchallenged, patriotic flaggery, came these, posted about the place:

A more historically inaccurate word salad of meaningless niceness you would struggle to find. An AI-generated collage of multicultural hands linked over a Union Jack, and a slogan that screams: “Whether you’ve lived here for generations or have arrived seeking safety and new beginnings, you’re welcome!” 

Sentiments such as these display an utter contempt for millions of everyday, decent people, whose only ‘crime’ is that they feel their country is being taken away from them and given to people who have no right to be here and who often hold the rest of us in total contempt. 

There is a growing feeling among the public in Britain, even in the smallest of villages, that the traditional ruling elites have lost all credibility; that there is absolutely no reason to place our trust in them any longer. These elites have demonstrated a profound disdain for the ‘proles’ and their sense of patriotism. Rather than addressing the mounting problems, they are more inclined to ignore the issues altogether, choosing to avert their gaze from the whole sorry mess—a mess often of their own making. 

Indeed, it seems that high-status individuals despise ordinary people so much that when those people gather to commemorate a mother murdered by an illegal migrant, there is a counter-protest. These demonstrations are crewed by the usual suspects—suspects who never have to deal with the consequences of their luxury beliefs and who prefer the symbols of supranational technocracies or identitarian pressure groups to the flag of their own nation. 

After a few weeks, the flags bedecking our village were removed. I later found out (obviously from a man in the pub) that they were taken down by the local authority in the dead of night so they could escape scrutiny from the public. The same man also claimed to know the flag raisers, who, it will come as no surprise, were people who get their hands dirty for a living rather than sit in front of a screen. They put the flags back up a short while later, but they were again eradicated by the council. At the time of writing, they have not returned. Notably, the aforementioned ‘woke’ posters have never been defaced or removed by anyone, which reveals a degree of tolerance by regular individuals that the so-called ‘progressives’ never seem to possess.

If flag wars can happen here, they can happen anywhere. It demonstrates that the very real concern about the nation’s future is not just the preservation of the former industrial towns and cities of the United Kingdom, but of folk in rural communities who are not directly affected by issues such as mass migration and ethnic Balkanisation. And the response of the clerisy is the same; it is always the same. Rather than confront the crisis directly, they choose to defame those ‘low information’ people who liked their country just as it was. 

God forbid it takes one of their own daughters being molested to change their minds.

europeanconservative

Polish schoolchildren have protested a teacher’s removal of a Christian cross from a classroom and putting it in a bin, spurring a demonstration in front of the school (photo above). 

At the same time, the justice ministry is drafting legislative changes to reduce penalties under Poland’s blasphemy legislation, sparking criticism that the government is reducing the protection afforded Christians.  

The pupils’ demonstration came yesterday over an English language teacher who had demanded on December 15 the removal of the cross from a classroom she was teaching in. When the schoolchildren protested, she threw the cross into a bin. 

The teacher’s behaviour in the Baltic coast township of Kielno led to action by the school’s headmaster. He suspended the teacher pending an investigation of the incident and the mayor of the municipality has reported the matter to the local public prosecutor.

In Poland, the Christian cross is a protected symbol and the country has on its statute book legislation which criminalises blasphemy, with offences liable for prison sentences.

Yesterday morning, a demonstration in support of the school students was staged outside of the school. Conservative activists and politicians linked to the opposition Conservatives (PiS) and the right-wing Confederation of the Polish Crown took part.

One of the parents attending said there was a need to support the school students who had stood up for their faith. 

“Young heroes remind us, adults, that one must not desert a just cause – especially the defence of the cross,” she said.

The demonstrators carried banners stating that “destroying the cross = lack of tolerance”; “Do not be afraid”; “ Poland has a choice: Either the cross or the crescent” and  “The cross = the foundation of our faith”.

PiS MP Dorota Arciszewska-Mielewczyk told portal Niezalezna that there was a need to stand up for Christian values. 

“We came with a certain baggage of values; we are not ashamed to defend at every step the values we profess. The cross is our sign.

“We are Christians, Catholics, we go to church, baptise our children, receive Communion and we will not allow the symbol of our faith, our cultural heritage, our national heritage to be desecrated,”  Arciszewska-Mielewczyk said.

“There is no place here for breaking the law to destroy the symbols of our culture, our faith, our love of God.

“Today we are demonstrating unity with parents who had the courage, with the parents of children who had even greater courage, to say ‘no’ to a teacher who should be  teaching respect for every religion,”  she added. 

During Communist times, state authorities ordered the Christian cross to be removed from schools and other public buildings, angering most of the population. The crosses returned when Communism ended.

Barbara Nowacka, the education minister in the centre-left government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, told broadcaster TVN24 that disciplinary measures have been taken against the teacher. She said her conduct was “inadmissible by any social norm”, adding that, regardless of individual beliefs, the cross is an important symbol.

“The feelings of both the majority and minority must be respected,” Nowacka said.

Meanwhile, justice minister Waldemar Żurek told reporters his ministry is drafting an amendment to Poland’s blasphemy law to remove imprisonment from the catalogue of penalties for the offence of insulting religious feelings. 

According to the ministry the move is intended to comply with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In 2022, it had ruled against Poland for violating the rights of Polish pop star Dorota Rabczewska, known as “Doda”, when she was convicted of blasphemy in 2012.

Doda was found guilty of offending religious feelings during an interview in which she said it was “difficult to believe in” the Bible as it was “written by someone wasted from drinking wine and smoking weed”.

She was fined €1,200, a penalty the ECHR ruled was “particularly severe”. 

Any change in the blasphemy law is unlikely to be supported by the opposition PiS-aligned President Karol Nawrocki. Without that approval no legislative change can come into effect.

When last in government between 2015 and 2023 PiS had tightened the blasphemy legislation.

Żurek’s plans to soften the blasphemy law have  been criticised by conservative legal think-tank Ordo Iuris. It argues that the loosening of legislation will send a signal that related offences will no longer be taken seriously and will encourage religious conflict and attacks on Christians. 

Liberal lawyers, though, have argued that the ministry’s proposals do not go far enough and that the blasphemy law should be abolished altogether.

That, they said, was because Polish law already includes provisions that criminalise violence, threats and abuse that is religiously motivated and the existing law is a threat to freedom of expression. 

brusselssignal

Former Labour Blackburn MP Kate Hollern speaking about the ‘toxic’ general election campaign where she lost to Gaza thug Adnan Hussain MP.
“At one point, I was told I was going to be beheaded.
At another point, I was told I worshipped a false god.
When someone tells you, ‘You are going to be beheaded’, and you see a picture of yourself on social media covered in blood, of course it worries you.”

🚨SHOCKING. Former Labour Blackburn MP Kate Hollern speaking about the ‘toxic’ general election campaign where she lost to Gaza thug Adnan Hussain MP.
"At one point, I was told I was going to be beheaded.
At another point, I was told I worshipped a false god.
When someone tells… pic.twitter.com/kUtZatQC6E

— Subversive Force (@sirwg202110) January 8, 2026

It was a credible threat. “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks” (Qur’an 47:4)

UK MP says that during her campaign against Muslim candidate, ‘I was told I was going to be beheaded’

Robert Jenrick has warned Britain is facing the “fight of a generation” against home-grown Islamism and that “time is running out” to prevent an extremist takeover.

In his damning verdict, the Shadow Justice Secretary accused the Government and law enforcement of being willfully ignorant of the growing threat.

Mr Jenrick argued that decades of mass immigration and the “abject failure of integration” had allowed Islamists who were “unrespecting of British institutions of law and order, violent or openly threatening violence” to gain a foothold.

As a result, he suggested police forces were now either unable to fully enforce the law or were too intimidated to do so.

“They believe they would be overwhelmed if they tried to enforce the law. They are too defeatist to try. Or perhaps they believe it better not to, as the sight of their failure would be catastrophic for faith in them and in the rule of law as we’ve known it,” the Shadow Justice Secretary slammed.

Mr Jenrick warned that failing to confront Islamist extremism would have severe consequences for British society.

He warned an empowered radical movement would lead to the “ubiquity of Sharia courts, cousin marriage, hate preachers in mosques (enjoying charitable status), rampant antisemitism”.

“Our foreign policy will be increasingly dictated by Islamism, rather than by any traditional understanding of British interests. Women’s rights will be further undermined. Our country will be a more threatening and violent place,” the former cabinet minister predicted.

“The fight against Islamism is the fight of our generation.”

“It’s a battle for the soul of the country. It begins by telling the truth,” he declared.

In his warning, Mr Jenrick pointed to West Midlands Police decision prohibiting Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters from attending an Aston Villa fixture as evidence of an apparent surrender to Islamist elements in British society.

Chief Constable Craig Guildford is facing severe scrutiny over the decision, with ministers calling for his resignation over the move.

After the force had initially justified the move over fears of hooliganism from the visiting Israeli fans, it emerged that there were fears of armed locals taking to the streets.

Consultations that led to the ban on Mosques, which had been criticised for hosting radical speakers, have also intensified pressure on West Midlands Police.

The Shadow Justice Secretary highlighted several other incidents to support his claims, including what he described as “the almost paramilitary display” in Tower Hamlets last October to confront a Ukip protest.

He compared the scene of thousands of men to an “Islamist version of the black shirts that stalked the same streets almost a century ago”.

Mr Jenrick also referenced an incident in West Yorkshire where a senior West Yorkshire Police officer appeared to “hastily” attempt to placate the local Muslim community after “a 14-year-old autistic boy scuffed a copy of the Koran in the school playground”.

“The police felt it necessary to plead with local Islamists in order to protect the boy and his family for fear of what might happen otherwise,” Mr Jenrick wrote in The Telegraph.

The top Tory additionally highlighted the case of a teacher at Batley Grammar School, who remains in hiding following threats after displaying a caricature of the prophet Muhammad during a lesson.

“The reality is the police can no longer sustain their authority in parts of Britain and have to lie to preserve the illusion,” Mr Jenrick stressed.

gbnews

Public prosecutors in Germany are investigating allegations of corruption at the Bielefeld immigration office, where employees are suspected of issuing permanent residence permits in return for payments of thousands of euros.

The Bielefeld public prosecutor’s office confirmed to public broadcaster WDR that four people are under investigation for bribery, accepting bribes, and granting and accepting undue advantages. Two of the suspects are employees of the city of Bielefeld, while the other two include an interpreter and a person who allegedly first obtained a residence permit and then assisted in the suspected criminal activities.

According to investigators, the case concerns at least 15 suspected incidents between September 2023 and October 2025. In one instance, a payment of €4,000 is alleged to have been made in exchange for a so-called settlement permit, which grants permanent residence.

Prosecutors are also examining allegations that bribes were paid to secure faster appointment dates at the immigration office.

Searches were carried out in November and December 2025 at the homes of the suspects. According to WDR, the searches also included offices within the Bielefeld immigration authority itself, and several devices were seized.

A permanent residence permit is the silver standard for migrants, only inferior to citizenship. Migrants must usually meet several conditions in order to obtain it. Applicants must typically have held a valid residence permit or paid into the statutory pension system for at least five years, as well as show sufficient funds or income, and have proficient German language skills.

The two employees at the agency have been suspended pending investigation, and Bielefeld mayor Christian Bauer has instructed the city’s audit office to repurpose itself as an anti-corruption unit to probe the agency.

This is far from an isolated incident of corruption and fraud in relation to illegal immigration across Europe. In September last year, a major investigation by broadcasters NTV, RTL, and Stern magazine uncovered a booming trade in forged language and integration certificates on TikTok, with fake documents being used to gain German residence permits and citizenship.

Similarly, in July 2024, thousands of people were alleged to have traveled to Germany with false documents at the behest of the German Foreign Ministry, with several German embassies and consulates implicated in the scandal.

In Spain last October, the Spanish National Police announced the arrest of 12 people for orchestrating fraudulent partnerships between Spaniards and illegal immigrants using sham marriages and forged documents in order to obtain residence permits, while in France last January, a civil servant from the Nancy foreigners’ admission service in Nancy was referred to the public prosecutor’s office to face allegations of corruption and fraud after being accused of facilitating the stay of illegal migrants in exchange for cash.

rmx.news

DEI Child Rapists, ‘Liars & Cowards’ who bow down to radical Islam. Our woke police are mired in scandals proving they aren’t fit for purpose. On this #NCfNewspeak, the panel discuss DEI criminal hires + police hiding the REAL (Islamist) reason for banning Macaabi fans from a football match

A 36-year-old Yemeni man currently housed at Wethersfield Immigration Centre has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a medical worker and committing an act of public indecency.

Muqbil Al Dhaheri appeared before Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, where he admitted both charges stemming from incidents that occurred on Monday.

The asylum seeker, who entered the United Kingdom in September 2025, remains at the Essex immigration facility while his claim is being processed.

Al Dhaheri committed the sexual assault while receiving treatment at Broomfield Hospital in Chelmsford, before urinating publicly during his return journey to the centre.

Prosecutor Rebecca Debenham told the court that Al Dhaheri had been receiving care in the hospital’s intensive care unit when the assault took place.

“He walked towards the nursing station and rubbed his hand down the right-hand side of one of the medical workers – he smirked as he did so,” she said.

A colleague of the victim intervened, telling Al Dhaheri to stop his behaviour.

The complainant believes the contact was deliberate rather than accidental.

The prosecutor explained that while being transported back to the immigration centre, Al Dhaheri was informed he had behaved inappropriately during his hospital stay.

Al Dhaheri requested to use the toilet, and when the bus became stuck at traffic lights, he exited the vehicle and began urinating against nearby railings.

The incident was witnessed by multiple members of the public, including a woman and child travelling in the car directly behind the transport vehicle.

Pedestrians walking along the pavement also observed the act.This behaviour formed the basis of the public decency charge to which Al Dhaheri pleaded guilty.

The prosecutor noted that Al Dhaheri had already been confronted about his conduct at the hospital before committing this second offence during the journey back to Wethersfield.

Deputy District Judge Sarah Hannah adjourned proceedings to allow for a pre-sentence report to be prepared.

Al Dhaheri was released on conditional bail ahead of his sentencing hearing, scheduled for Monday, 16 February at the same court.

Defence solicitor Chloe Goodey acknowledged her client faces a potential custodial sentence for the offences.

“I would suggest not enough is known about his circumstances in order to sentence him, which is why I make the application for a pre-sentence report,” she told the court.

As Al Dhaheri was escorted from the dock following the hearing, he gave a thumbs up gesture to those present in the courtroom.

gbnews

Three-in-10 Albertans are open to separating from Canada, with the majority of support coming from young citizens.

According to data released January 8 by Research Co., 42 percent of Albertans age 18 to 34 supported the province becoming an independent country, marking a 15-point increase since 2023.

“By a 2-to-1 margin, Albertans currently express a desire to remain in Canada,” Mario Canseco, president of Research Co., revealed. “Still, the growth of separatist sentiment is significant across some groups.”

The research surveys 703 Albertans online between January 4-6. Overall support for separating from Canada sat at 31%, which is a nine-point increase from 2023. Support for Alberta joining the United States ranked lower, with 24% supporting the plan and 72% opposed.

Additionally, separatism received more support from Conservative compared with Liberal or NDP Albertans.

Young Canadians are especially affected by the Liberal Party’s election as a decade of Liberal policies has led to rising food and shelter costs. In October, Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem warned citizens to anticipate a lower standard of living.

Canadian taxpayers are already dealing with high inflation and high taxes, due in part to Liberal government overspending and excessive money printing, and even admitting that giving money to Ukraine comes at the “taxpayers’” expense.

Canadians pay some of the highest income and other taxes in the world. As reported by LifeSiteNews, Canadian families spend, on average, 42 percent of their income on taxes, more than food and shelter costs. Inflation in Canada is at a high not seen in decades.

The release of the polling results comes after a petition to separate Alberta from Canada opened last week. The referendum is the province’s first major step toward separating from Canada. In order for the movement to succeed, the petition must gather 177,732 signatures between January 3 and May 2, representing 10 percent of the total votes cast in the 2023 provincial general election.

Smith’s United Conservative government earlier this year passed Bill 54, which sets the groundwork for possible independence referendums by making such votes easier to trigger. The bill lowered the signature threshold from 600,000 to 177,000.

If the signatures are gathered, it will compel the provincial government to conduct a provincial referendum. All Albertans would be asked to vote on the province’s separatism on or before the next provincial election.

If more than 50 percent of the province is in favor of separating, Alberta would begin formal negotiations with the federal government.

Discussion of Alberta’s potential separation from Canada picked up in April after Prime Minister Mark Carney won the spring election and secured another Liberal government.

Since then, many Albertans have felt that the province’s conservative values are dismissed by the Liberal government in favor of a woke and “green” agenda. Carney, like former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau before him, said he is opposed to new pipeline projects that would allow Alberta oil and gas to be unleashed. Also, his green agenda, like Trudeau’s, is at odds with Alberta’s main economic driver, its oil and gas industry.

As LifeSiteNews previously reported, in October, thousands of Albertans marched on the province’s capital of Edmonton, calling for the province to immediately secede from Canada.

lifesitenews

The debate in Germany over freedom of expression has intensified after remarks by Daniel Günther, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) prime minister of Schleswig-Holstein, triggered a political backlash across the country.

Speaking on the ZDF channel on January 7th, Günther called for far tougher regulation of media outlets and social networks that are “opponents and enemies of democracy”—ie. publications that do not align with his world view.

Warning that Germany’s political system would be “unrecognisable in ten years” if such “excesses” were not tackled, he openly entertained the idea of censorship and bans.

Among his proposals were a ban on social media access for under-16s, and he also attacked alternative media outlets, singling out the right-wing portal Nius for its role in criticising the candidacy of the left-wing judge Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf for Germany’s constitutional court.

If I look at Nius articles that have anything to do with me, there is usually nothing in them that is true.

Volker Boehme-Neßler, professor of constitutional law, said he was “shocked at how little understanding and how little feeling for freedom of expression a German prime minister has.”

He stressed that even polemical or false statements are protected: “You are allowed to say nonsense. That is part of freedom of opinion and media, as long as it does not constitute incitement to hatred and is not punishable by law.”

Criticism also came from within the CDU. Jan Jacobi, a regional chairman in Potsdam, wrote on X:

I am appalled at how a CDU prime minister fantasises about which opinions should still be permitted in our country.

Others rallied to Günther’s defence, including former CDU general secretary Ruprecht Polenz, who insisted: “Günther is completely right.” Chancellor Friedrich Merz and CDU general secretary Carsten Linnemann declined to comment.

Opposition parties were less restrained. Deputy leader of the liberal FDP party Wolfgang Kubicki branded the comments “absolutely unacceptable, authoritarian ramblings” and urged Günther to keep his “hands off press freedom.”

Das ist absolut inakzeptables, autoritäres Geschwurbel von Daniel Günther. Finger weg von der Presssfreiheit! WK pic.twitter.com/buqf5wHRO4

— Wolfgang Kubicki (@KubickiWo) January 8, 2026

Alice Weidel, co-leader of the right-wing AfD party, accused the CDU premier of “authoritarian madness,” warning:

Anyone who abolishes freedom of expression is himself an enemy of the constitution.

The episode resonates beyond one television appearance. Over the past few years, Germany has seen repeated clashes between the state and critical media, from the attempted ban of the right-wing magazine Compact—later overturned by a federal court on free-speech grounds—to the prosecution of journalist David Bendels for a satirical meme mocking former interior minister Nancy Faeser, a case now heading to appeal.

Taken together, these cases reveal a worrying pattern. Instead of debating rivals and rebutting criticism, mainstream parties increasingly reach for bans, regulation, and criminal law. Günther’s words are not an aberration but a symptom of a political culture in which dissent is treated as a problem to be eliminated.

europeanconservative