‘Wiki loves Ramadan’ message plastered on top of website’s Christianity page; the site has been accused of being ‘controlled by far-left activists’ by Elon Musk

The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia has the message ‘Wiki loves Ramadan’ plastered on top of its Christianity page | WIKIPEDIA

The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia has the message “Wiki loves Ramadan” plastered on top of its Christianity page.

The non-profit organisation, which attracts up to $180million in donations annually, displayed the religious banner at the top of the screen in support of their campaign for the Muslim celebration.

In 2025, Wikipedia detailed the “Wiki loves Ramadan” campaign as: “A global volunteer-driven campaign that encourages contributors to create and improve content related to Ramadan.

“This includes articles, photographs, quotes, and data about the religious, cultural, historical, and social aspects of Ramadan.

“The goal is to expand knowledge and make it accessible in many languages, helping people everywhere understand Ramadan’s significance beyond borders.”

The campaign saw contributors from 18 countries, including Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nigeria, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Germany, Ghana, Pakistan, and others.

Both online and offline events, including so-called “edit-a-thons” and workshops, were part of the scheme.

Wikipedia, celebrating 25 years since its inception, has been accused of ” ideological bias” before.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk previously claimed the site is “controlled by far-left activists” and told his social media followers to “stop donating to Wokepedia until they restore balance to their editing authority.”

The owner of X and Tesla even resorted to creating his own website, Grokapedia, in protest of the site. All articles produced are generated by AI.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s AI adviser, David Sacks, claimed the site is “hopelessly biased”, adding: “Magnifying the problem, Wikipedia often appears first in Google search results, and now it’s a trusted source for AI model training.”

Texas Senator Ted Cruz even sent a letter on October 3 to the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation founded by Jimmy Wales that hosts the site, requesting “information about ideological bias on the Wikipedia platform.”

In his letter, Mr Cruz claimed: “Acoordinated group of editors pushed antisemitic narratives on Wikipedia while whitewashing the activities of groups like Hamas.”

Former Interim US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, accused the site of “allowing foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda to the American public.”

However, the accusations have not solely been swirling around in America.

In December 2024, French magazine Le Point accused “a handful of hyperactive left-wing contributors” at Wikipedia of “distorting reality.”

The website experienced an eight per cent decline in readership in 2025 compared to 2024, which is expected to continue to decrease.

GB News has contacted Wikipedia for comment.

gbnews

Moroccan asylum seeker arrested for brutal assault and attempted rape of 19-year-old Dutch woman in Rotterdam, mayor describes ‘terrible crime’

Rotterdam police released a photo of the Moroccan asylum seeker suspect.

A 22-year-old Moroccan asylum seeker, who was staying at a taxpayer-funded Dutch asylum center, has been arrested in connection with a violent assault and attempted rape of a 19-year-old woman in the Rotterdam district of Schiebroek. The man, who was staying at a reception centre in Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, was apprehended at Dordrecht station on Wednesday after police released his photograph earlier that afternoon.

A Rotterdam police spokeswoman confirmed the suspect’s status as an asylum seeker. According to sources cited by De Telegraaf, he is what is known as a “safe lander” — someone who applies for asylum despite coming from a country considered safe and who has no realistic prospect of being granted leave to remain in the Netherlands.

Rotterdam Mayor Carola Schouten, who is known for promoting Rotterdam as a “dynamic and diverse global city,” had this to say about the crime:”I learned with horror of a serious crime that took place in Rotterdam-Schiebroek. It is terrible what the victim has experienced; it is also terrible for her loved ones.”

She also praised the swiftness of the police response, saying it “has led to the early arrest of a suspect.”

The attack took place in the early hours of Saturday morning, shortly before 5 a.m., on Secretariestraat. The young student had travelled from Rotterdam Central Station on the back of a friend’s bicycle before choosing to walk the final stretch home alone from the Gordelweg. Along the way, she passed a man cycling a cargo bike carrying a brown box. Moments later, she noticed the same man on foot behind her, while the cargo bike was nowhere to be seen. He seized her from behind and threatened her with a knife.

She managed to break free and fled into Secretariestraat, but the man caught up with her, assaulted her, and attempted to rape her. The attack only ended when a local resident was roused by the noise and came outside to investigate. Seeing the student being assaulted, he called out, causing the attacker to flee. The young woman was taken to the hospital immediately afterwards.

Police later examined a driveway on the street as part of their investigation. Neighbors said they had been unaware of what was unfolding outside.

“I heard screams, but had no idea why that was,” one resident said.

Another similar case rocked the Netherlands last year, involving a Nigerian migrant raping and murdering 17-year-old Lisa in Amsterdam.

In January this year, the victim of a Somali suspect stormed out of court when the attempted murder charge against the man was dropped by a Dutch court, despite the victim stating that she was strangled for several minutes by the man. The judge sentenced the man to three and a half years in prison for attempted sexual assault in the case.

rmx.news

Spanish PP party slams PM over refusal to help US in Iran war

The leader of the Spanish conservative People’s Party (PP), Alberto Núñez Feijóo, has accused Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez of “going against the security of Spain” because of his stance against the US and Israeli attack on Iran.

Spain is defying pressure from the US by refusing to authorise the use of its military bases for potential strikes against Iran.

Feijóo addressed this issue in a speech at the Europa Forum in Bilbao today, stating that Spain “must stand with its allies”, otherwise it will be left “without an operational framework”.

He also urged the European Union and the US not to confuse Spain’s “precarious government” with its citizens as a whole.

“Today, Spain is not a reliable partner, not only with the United States, but also within the EU, and today Spain does not have a voice when it comes to establishing strategic positions in response to the geopolitical problems the world is experiencing,” he insisted.

Feijóo has argued against “compromising” the Iranian regime, which he has accused of “massacring” its own citizens. “No democrat can deny this reality; the fewer tyrants there are in the world, the better.”

The PP leader accuses Pedro Sanchez of pandering to its ultra-left-wing electoral base.

Acknowledging that the US is one of the main investors in Spain and has been key to the defence of the southern border, he called it “irresponsible” to antagonise US President Donald Trump over a specific issue.

Many major US companies are present in Spain, especially in the industrial sector.  In 2022, cumulative US investment in Spain reached €33.1 billion.

EU member states remain split over how to respond to the escalating confrontation with Iran, exposing familiar fault lines in the bloc’s foreign policy with German Chancellor Merz joining Trump in criticising Spain over defence spending

Meanwhile, the European Commission has signalled resolve, declaring itself “ready” to defend the EU’s interests, even as the bloc struggles to present a single, coherent stance.

brusselssignal

Scottish transgender activists are helping young people use dangerous illegal hormones

March during Martigny Pride on July 20, 2024. Wikimedia Commons, Hibrideacus, CC-Zero

In Scotland, transgender activists are “advising young people on how to self-medicate using illicit cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers,” and experts warn of a “booming black market” with “vulnerable youths reportedly sourcing illegal supplies from street dealers and online vendors,” according to a report from the Scottish Daily Express.

A UK-wide ban on the sale, supply, prescription, and dispensing of puberty blockers for minors was introduced on a temporary basis in June 2024 after the Cass Review revealed the evidence of the harm they cause; that ban was made permanent in January 2025 by the pro-LGBT Labour government. It is a criminal offense to supply puberty blockers to minors in Scotland.

“Medical experts have issued stark warnings that self-medicating with these unregulated drugs carries severe health risks, including fatal dosing errors and contamination,” reported the Scottish Daily Express on March 1.

“Despite the dangers, a group operating under the name Trans Harm Reduction (THR) recently hosted a ‘Self-Med 101’ workshop inside a Glasgow bar … Shockingly, the group also actively offers assistance with ‘accessing supplies for trans people who are self-medicating in Ireland and Scotland.’”

The workshop included “the basics of self-medicating from costs to dosages to how to do things safely.”

“It’s frankly terrifying that vulnerable young people could be encouraged to use black market puberty blockers,” said Dr. Sandesh Gulhane, the Conservative shadow health secretary. “This would put lives at risk, and anyone involved in pushing these illicit medications must be investigated.”

A Scottish doctor, who spoke anonymously to the Sunday Times, shared Gulhane’s fear.

“To have organisations that facilitate self-medicalisation with no clinical oversight is dangerous,” he said. “The greatest harm is in the prescribing of cross sex hormones. These are used off licence and there is mounting evidence of the increased risk of irreversible harms, which include stroke, ischaemic heart disease and early mortality.”

“These groups bypass general practice, thereby removing safeguards,” he continued. “They are trans-led — one states it is a grassroots community group involving no medical professionals. There is no screening for comorbidities such as autism or trauma. There is a disclaimer stating they ‘cannot provide authoritative medical advice’ and, as such, absolve themselves of any medico-legal liability.”

They claim harm reduction by signposting patients to where they can have blood taken, but also provide advice on how patients can analyze their own results, again bypassing GP safeguarding.

A witness to the Glasgow workshop told the Sunday Times that “I witnessed hosts openly recommending websites for sourcing cross-sex hormones, of a fund to subsidise purchases and distributing syringes, needles and swabs. One referred to a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy on age, suggesting they were content to supply supplies such as injecting equipment to minors without verification.”

“Therapy was absent from discussion and irreversible changes and side-effects barely mentioned,” the witness added. “Peer-to-peer networks linked across Signal groups [secure messaging] and real-life meet-ups are quietly building an underground supply chain that bypasses clinicians entirely.”

“The uncomfortable truth is some of those charlatans now operate within self-described ‘trans community’ spaces. This parallel system, dangerous, illegal in key respects and almost impossible to eradicate, risks irreparable harm to vulnerable children and young people.”

Trans Harm Reduction, however, stated that it will continue its activities – and echoed the arguments made by pro-abortion activists who insist that abortion must be legal because otherwise it will be perpetrated illegally.

“Trans people will continue to self-medicate regardless of whether they can access support from medical professionals,” they claimed. THR now works to connect gender dysphoric youth with illegal drugs and keeps a “private list” of doctors willing to help.

Police Scotland have stated that they are keeping a close eye on the situation. “Emerging drug trends are monitored and we will act proportionately to any increase in the prevalence or circulation of new or existing drug types,” they said in a statement.

lifesitenews

‘They took my only child, my princess’ – Two men with a migration background killed Frenchwoman Brigitte Roaux during deadly street race, given mostly suspended sentences

Two foreign men have been convicted of manslaughter after mowing down 32-year-old Estelle Roaux while the two were racing each other on a narrow bridge. The two men will not serve any prison time, as they were given a three-year prison sentence, with two years suspended. In addition, they may be back on the road in just two years, or even sooner, given their history of driving without a license.

On June 15, 2022, the two men, Mamadou D., originally from Mali, and Zidane Junior NM, were treating the stretch of road between Saint-Pierre-d’Oléron and Dolus like a racetrack. Their reckless driving, which saw them speeding at110 km/h in a zone set at 70 km/h, ended on a bridge near the Oléron Island viaduct. The two were swerving from lane to lane on the narrow bridge, trying to overtake each other, according to witnesses, when Estelle Roaux was struck by Mamadou D. on her motorcycle while driving in the opposite lane.

“They took my only child, my princess… They ruined my life,” said Brigitte Roaux, who has been devastated by grief for almost four years since her daughter’s death.

Mamadou D. had his license suspended and will not be able to apply for a new one for two years. Zidane Junior NM did not even have his license when Estelle Roaux was killed. He will also have to wait two years before he can apply for a new one. Despite their repeated traffic violations, including after the death of Estelle Roaux, they will be allowed to be on the road in just two years.

Due to the judge’s sentence, French outlet Sud Ouest claimed the men would not serve prison time.

The pair had been friends since the age of 16, and both worked at a fiber optic installation company. They were at a worksite on the day of the accident.

Witnesses described them “driving like crazy” and weaving in and out of traffic, while drivers coming from the opposite direction were forced to swerve to avoid a collision. Video surveillance confirmed what witnesses had described.

No remorse and further traffic infractions

In court, the two defendants showed little remorse. Their behavior after the accident only compounded matters — both committed further traffic offenses during their judicial supervision, despite being prohibited from driving. One of them had seven speeding offenses alone since the time of Estelle Roaux’s death.

The prosecution was unsparing. Philippe Courtois, lawyer for the victim’s in-laws, called them “irresponsible” and “imbeciles.”While acknowledging that neither man set out to cause a death, the Public Prosecutor’s Office argued that they had “intentionally adopted extremely dangerous behavior towards other road users.” The fact that the driver without a valid French license was not the one who struck the victim did not absolve him — it takes two to race. This reasoning led prosecutor Lucile Babin to request the same 3-year prison sentence for both men, with a deferred committal warrant.

The defense urged the magistrates “not to judge with the heart.” The court ultimately handed down sentences of three years in prison, including two years suspended with probation for three years, along with obligations to seek treatment and maintain employment.

The light sentence for this type of street racing stands in stark contrast to similar cases in other countries, such as one in Germany, where Faraz A. was given a life sentence for killing 22-year-old Janine W.

In 2019, Berlin prosecutor at the time, Andreas Winkelmann, was interviewed by Welt after a deadly illegal street race and the introduction of a new law to combat the growing wave of such deadly accidents.

“Most of the perpetrators are male, in their early 20s, and have a migration background,” he said.

rmx.news

‘They’ve Lost Their Moral Compass’: Farage Unveils Labour Defectors

Brexit pioneer and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and his London Mayoral candidate Laila Cunningham unveiled two defections from the Labour party on Wednesday, the Former Labour mayor of Newham Sir Robin Wales and 21-year Labour councillor Clive Furness (photo above).Screengrab youtube

Nigel Farage introduced two veteran Labour politicians to his team on Wednesday, including a former London region mayor, stating their long experience on the local government “front line” would be invaluable to the party as Reform UK seeks to transform the country.

Brexit pioneer and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and his London Mayoral candidate Laila Cunningham unveiled two defections from the Labour party on Wednesday, the Former Labour mayor of Newham Sir Robin Wales and 21-year Labour councillor Clive Furness. Farage said Furness would stand as Reform’s candidate for the forthcoming Mayor of Newham election in May while Sir Robin will become Reform’s London director of local government.

Mr Farage has long been teasing Labour defections to Reform in the face of criticism that Reform has taken too many former Conservatives, and stated that the arrival of these experienced local government operatives, who he said had decades of service between them, would be a boon. The Reform leader said: “in some ways our weakness as a party is not having people who have been on the front line, managed budget, run government at all levels. And today makes a significant step forwards for us in that direction”.

Sir Robin Wales, who Farage hailed as an unusually successful former Labour Mayor, explained of their defection that endless failures including on the migrant boats, the state of the military, housing prices making family formation impossible for young people, the soaring cost of the NHS with no improvement in health outcomes, and “the rape gang coverup” had forced them to move. He said: “we came to the conclusion that the old parties can’t deliver services and the result of not delivering is cynicism in the electorate. We promise, promise, promise and nothing happens”.

On Reform, he said the party “has got a lot of rough edges”, but that there is an opportunity “to transform our society” at hand.

The former Labour man decried the attempts to paint Reform UK as extremist. He said: “they keep labelling and labelling and labelling. If Reform is racist I wouldn’t be in this room or even near this headquarters. It’s not.

“I can show you some other parties that are racist, some parties that are anti-Semitic but I don’t believe Reform is in any way racist. But what it is doing is standing against the illiberal values that people are trying to bring into our countries, it is discussing issues other people don’t want to discuss.”

He said he’d formerly represented an electoral area that was “one third Muslim” but he was concerned about the outcome of last week’s special election, where it is alleged that sectarian voting and unsound voting practices swayed the result. He remarked: “Gorton… exposed the transactional relationship between reactionary Muslims and those who want to get their votes.

The political establishment have “lost their moral compass”, he said, for their willingness to permit medical experiments on children. And as for the present debate on the value of university, Sir Robin added: “they’re scamming kids on the debt they’ve got… on pointless courses with fourth-rate lecturers”.

breitbart

German Establishment Shows Its Distaste for Democracy Ahead of Likely AfD Victory

Friedrich Merz’s party, along with the other mainstream groupings in German politics, constantly brands the populist AfD as the enemy of democracy. But when it suits them, they are more than happy to trample on long-established practices themselves.

The elite late last year ousted a democratically elected deputy mayor from office in North Rhine-Westphalia, simply because she represented the AfD, on the ludicrous pretext that she might have frightened off tourists. In Lower Saxony, it has breached the party’s democratic rights by effectively excluding it from oversight of the Office for the Constitution. And in Nieder-Olm, the AfD has been altogether barred from standing in this year’s mayoral election.

Democracy will next suffer at the hands of the establishment coalition in the Saxony-Anhalt September elections, which we previously identified as having the potential to set a course for the European Union.

The AfD has long polled at around 40% in this region, well above the CDU—the party of Merz, which follows in second place with around 25% of the expected vote. So the constitution and laws are being amended there to hinder the opposition party even in the likely event of ‘victory.’

Süddeutsche Zeitung reports that the CDU, SPD, and FDP, alongside the Greens and the Left faction, are working on legislation they hope will pass in May, to—as the paper put it—“safeguard the most important democratic institutions.” This will make it more difficult for the largest parliamentary group to choose the state parliament president, and reduce its influence on the membership of the state constitutional court.

(Current) officials also want to make it more difficult to abolish the State Agency for Civic Education, which the AfD says has “increasingly developed into a left-wing indoctrination institution.”

Yet AfD lead candidate Ulrich Siegmund claims that “much of what is now being proposed can be reversed through simple legislation or adjusted again later.” Right-wing publication Junge Freiheit suggests he is wrong to be so “unperturbed.”

europeanconservative

Welcome to the UN, the largest asylum in history

The sooner this circus of corrupt lunatics shuts down, the better off we will all be.
Iranian child brides 2013-2017 Charles Jacobs

by Giulio Meotti

“A child should never be in a marriage,” announce the United Nations.

Here are the ten countries with the highest rates of child marriage:

Niger – 76%

Chad – 61%

Central African Republic – 61%

Mali – 54%

Mozambique – 53%

South Sudan – 52%

Bangladesh – 51%

Burkina Faso – 51%

Guinea – 47%

Somalia – 45%

So why does the UN use a Western girl to represent child marriage, when it takes place in non-Western countries?

It is like illustrating hunger in Africa by using a chubby Scandinavian child: an act of whitewashing that covers demographic and cultural reality and insinuates a horrible colonialist paternalism. Globalism rhymes with racism.

The UN’s choice is not innocent; it is a symptom of an agenda that uses Western woke aesthetics to avoid pointing fingers at non-white cultures, for fear of being accused of “racism” and “Islamophobia”. In a world politically correct to the point of absurdity, the UN promotes an “inclusive” narrative that paradoxically excludes the real victims of oppression.

But this is the UN: a bureaucratic leviathan that indulges in distortions bordering on the ridiculous and grotesque.

In 2011, the United States mission to the UN under Barack Obama revealed that “74 cents of every dollar spent by the United Nations is tied to personnel costs.”

Now we know we are also paying people who think that child marriage is a problem of Western countries, not in any of the multitude of failed and tribal states which practice it.

Between 1995 and 2019, in the glorious “State of Palestine,” 200,000 marriages were registered, 95 percent of which involved underage girls. Iraq has just lowered the legal marriage age to 9. And Syrian girls are married very young even in the glorious multicultural Federal Republic of Germany.

Yet for the UN, the child bride is a white, blonde girl.

Meanwhile, the Security Council, which should be the “adult in the room” regarding threats to global stability and security, in January was led by Somalia, a failed state in the middle of a civil war, known for everything except stability and security-though certainly well known for having many child brides.

Meanwhile, the Islamic regime of Iran, where since 1979 the legal marriage age has been lowered to 9, legalizing pedophilia, has just been elected vice president of the UN Commission for Social Development, whose priority themes will be “the promotion of democracy, gender equality, and the guarantee of tolerance and nonviolence.”

President: “I hear no objections.”

Only at the UN does one take Francesca Albanese seriously, a character straight out of an Italian novel.

It so happens that UN Women-the UN organization for women’s rights-took months to acknowledge that Hamas committed mass rapes against Israeli women on October 7, while never missing Amal Clooney’s birthday.

It so happens that the UN celebrates the niqab as a tool of female emancipation.

It so happens that a UN conference on press freedom is canceled so as not to upset the Turks.

It so happens that for the United Nations the word “mankind” must be replaced with “humanity.” It sounds more woke.

It so happens that UN Secretary-General António Guterres says that Islamic terrorism is caused by …“climate change”.

So, child marriages are among whites, Jewish women deserve Hamas’s rapes, Afghan women must be put back in their place by the Taliban, misogyny is defeated with inclusive writing, Christians burn in Nigeria because of CO₂, and the ayatollahs are masters of progress.

As in Orwell, at the UN war is peace, ignorance is strength, oppression is empowerment and reality is malleable.

John Bolton, former US ambassador to the UN, said: “The UN Secretariat building in New York has 38 floors. If it lost ten, it would make no difference at all.”

The sooner this circus of corrupt lunatics shuts down, the better off we will all be.

And in place of the UN in New York, they should build a shopping mall, a new Trump Tower or a ‘peace and love’ brothel. Anything would be better than this glass asylum.

israelnationalnews

Luxembourg becomes second country to add abortion ‘freedom’ to constitution

On March 1, Luxembourg became the second country in the world to embed the “freedom” to kill children in the womb by abortion into its national constitution. The first, France, voted to put abortion in its constitution in 2024 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and declared that “abortion is not a constitutional right.”

Forty-eight out of 60 members of the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies voted for abortion, with a mere six legislators voting against it, and two abstentions. The two-thirds majority necessary for a constitutional change was achieved.

In 2024, the leftist party déi Lénk (“The Left”) proposed the constitutional amendment, and a draft law was submitted in May 2025. The State Council of the Grand Duchy, which functions as the upper chamber, reviewed and approved the draft law in June.

The initial proposal prompted a fierce debate, with the Christian Social People’s Party objecting to abortion being referred to as a “right,” which would theoretically create a “duty” for the state to uphold; the majority parties compromised with the term “freedom,” which guaranteed the legality of abortion but allows for legal restrictions. A proposal to raise the abortion limit to 14 weeks of pregnancy and an amendment to guarantee a “right” to contraception were rejected.

Abortion is currently legal on demand in Luxembourg until 12 weeks (three months) of pregnancy; a mandatory three-day waiting period and a pre-abortion counselling session were abolished in July 2025. Abortions are permitted much later in pregnancy if the preborn child is judged to have a “fatal fetal abnormality.”

“We see throughout the world that women’s rights are in the firing line,” claimed lawmaker Marc Baum. “This vote in the chamber is historic. It’s also about what side of history we are on. It’s whether we are willing and capable to defend out democratic values.” For Baum and his political allies, the destruction of children in the womb is the right side of history – and abortion is a fundamental democratic value.

The Democratic Party, which has 14 lawmakers, permitted each of its members to vote their conscience, as did other parties.

“DP lawmaker Gérard Schockmel had opposed guaranteeing a right to abortion, saying it does not take into account the rights of the unborn child,” the Luxembourg Times reported. “He also described the debate as being spurred by what he called ruthless feminist ideology.”

Luxembourg’s Christian Democrat CSV had previously decided to support the proposal, with speaker Laurent Zeimet on Tuesday saying the vote was for the people, reflecting changes in society and going with the times. His remarks came after criticism from right-wing MP Fred Keup, who had questioned the party’s conservative credentials during his speech.

Last month, a group of international scholars, including academics from Harvard, Oxford, and other prestigious institutions, signed an open letter calling on lawmakers to reject the proposed amendment, warning that the term “freedom” would inevitably be interpreted by judges as a “right.”

Luxembourg is a constitutional monarchy, but the monarch – Grand Duke Guillaume V – has very little political power, in part due to his father’s opposition to euthanasia in 2008. After Grand Duke Henri refused to grant assent to the legalization of euthanasia, parliament voted to reduce the monarch’s powers to ensure that the royal signature would be a formality going forward.

lifesitenews