BRAZIL: Trans-Identified Male Politician Who Attempted to Have Women’s Rights Activist Imprisoned For “Misgendering” Him Chosen to Lead Women’s Rights Committee

A trans-identified male politician who previously attempted to have a woman imprisoned for “misgendering” him was elected as president of the Women’s Rights Committee. Felipe Santos Silva, who has adopted the name Erika Hilton, told the Chamber of Deputies that the Committee should focus on women “without exception in their dignity and plurality,” and included transvestites in his definition.

“We will discuss projects here, we will discuss the lives of women here, we will remember that, whether they like it or not, cis women, trans woman and travestis [transvestites] will not be abandoned in this discussion, and I don’t care about anyone’s wishes,” Hilton, of the Socialism and Liberty Party, stated.

In Brazil, the Commission for the Defense of Women’s Rights (Comissão de Defesa dos Direitos da Mulher) – is a standing committee in the Chamber of Deputies. Its members are responsible for evaluating legislation and public policies related to violence against women and issues that impact women’s health.

The decision was celebrated on Reddit forum r/MTF, where men who claim to be women said Hilton’s appointment was “fantastic” and “epic.”

Upon accepting the role of President of the Women’s Rights Commission, Hilton blasted his critics as “LGBTphobes” and “defenders of pedophilia.”

On March 11, the same day he was elected to the position, Hilton filed a criminal complaint against TV presenter Carlos Massa, widely known as Ratinho, for questioning his appointment to the Women’s Rights Commission. On the Sistema Brasileiro de Televisão (Brazilian Television System – SBT), Ratinho criticized the decision, stating, “I didn’t think it was very fair… why give [the role] to a trans woman?” He also remarked that Hilton “is not a woman.”

“I have nothing against trans people,” Ratinho said. “For a woman to be a woman, she has to have a uterus.”

The claim against Ratinho and SBT, filed with the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo, accuses the presenter of “transphobia, transphobic slurs,” and “gender-based political violence.” Hilton is demanding $10 million Brazilian reals, the equivalent of $1.9 million dollars.

“What the presenter committed was violence, an attack, and it wasn’t just against me,” Hilton wrote in a social media post. “Ratinho interrupted his program to say that trans women aren’t women, that women who don’t menstruate aren’t women, that women who don’t have a uterus aren’t women, and that women who don’t have children aren’t women. This attack from Ratinho was against all trans women and against all cis women who no longer menstruate or never have.”

“He and SBT will pay for their actions, in the civil and criminal spheres,” he continued. “And they won’t pay me, but all women victims of violence, trans and cis. Finally, it’s worth remembering: I am and always will be a woman. This presenter is, and always will be, a rat.”

But Ratinho is not the only individual who has faced criminal prosecution for declining to “validate” Hilton.

As previously reported by Reduxx, feminist activist Isabela Cêpa faced criminal charges lodged against her by Hilton in 2021.

Hilton was elected to São Paolo’s municipal government in November of 2020, winning his seat by a landslide that gave him the title of the most voted-for ‘woman’ in Brazil.

At the time of his victory, Hilton was celebrated in international media as being a “symbolic triumph” for transgender people. Hilton was amongst the top 10 most-voted for candidates in all of Brazil, and was touted as the “only woman” to make the list.

“At the time I didn’t even know who this person was. I just saw a headline on an Instagram page celebrating that ‘the most voted woman in São Paulo is a transwoman,’” Cêpa told Reduxx. “Then, I shared a video with my followers saying I was disappointed to hear that the most voted-for woman in São Paulo – later found out that it was in the entire country – was a man.”

Hilton didn’t report Cêpa to police until November of 2021, and in January, police arrived at Cêpa’s mother’s workplace to ask for her whereabouts. After speaking with police, Cêpa did not hear about the status of the complaint until June 2022, when she was contacted by a reporter seeking comment for an article.

It was at that time that Cêpa learned she was being charged with 5 counts of “social racism” after the Public Prosecutor combed her social media feed to find other “transphobic” statements. In total, Cêpa was facing 25 years in prison for calling Hilton a man.

In 2019, Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court ruled that discrimination against ‘LGBTQ Community’ constituted a penal offense, but fell under existing race-based protections as a form of “social racism.” This came a few years after State Police in São Paolo began to include trans-identified males in “femicide” statistics.

Last year, Cêpa was granted full refugee protections by the European Union Agency for Asylum. The previous year, 2024, Cêpa had been stopped by at the Salvador Bahia Airport while attempting to travel to Spain to visit a friend. Federal agents flagged an alert linked to her passport and pulled her aside for further inspection. During the subsequent interview, authorities reportedly determined that her situation could meet the criteria for political persecution.

In June of 2025, Cêpa formally applied for refugee status, which she was granted – making her the first Brazilian citizen to receive this designation for state persecution since 1985.

In September 2025, Justice Gilmar Mendes rejected Hilton’s complaint against Cêpa, and in the ruling, stated that calling Hilton a “man” does not constitute a hate crime.

In December, women’s magazine Marie Claire named Hilton as one of it’s “women of the year.” Hilton was called “one of the most influential voices of her generation” and praised for his “initiatives that expand rights, rethink work models and put women and trans people at the center of discussions on welfare, citizenship, equity and access.” His persecution of Cêpa and threats towards other feminists was not mentioned.

As previously reported by Reduxx, multiple Brazilians have faced criminal charges for statements or commentary deemed “transphobic.” Earlier this year, women’s rights activist Karen Mizuno revealed she had been notified by police that she may face criminal charges after mocking a trans activist who claimed that “archaeologists are transphobic.” Mizuno faces up to three years in prison.

reduxx

Concerns in Europe over Another Migrant Crisis Amid Conflict in Iran

Still grappling with the civilizational transformations of the migrant crisis sparked over a decade ago by conflict in the Middle East, the European Union is facing the prospect of another large wave, with little more in the way of protection for its external borders.

In 2015, more than a million migrants poured into Europe as German Chancellor Angela Merkel unilaterally opened the gates of the bloc to mass migration from Africa and the Middle East, most notably from the Syrian Civil War, which in part was exacerbated by U.S. involvement, with the Obama administration funding rebel groups against the now-defunct regime of Bashar al-Assad.

The influx of the largest number of alleged asylum seekers since the Second World War upended European society and politics radically, sparking crime waves in once peaceful nations like Sweden, ingraining Islamist terrorist movements across the continent, straining national budgets, and entrenching sectarian politics.

Characteristic of the bureaucracy-obsessed European Union, it took a decade for the bloc to reach a form of migration agreement, dubbed the Migration and Asylum Pact, which is still only set to come into force by June. Even this agreement was struck over the objection of conservative nations such as Hungary and Poland, given that its primary aim is to share the burden of migration equally throughout the EU, meaning that countries which fail to police their borders can send illegals to countries that do, upon threat of financial penalties from Brussels.

It is unclear if the Migration Pact will be able to function regardless of outside pressure, with it already facing the prospect of Viktor Orbán’s Hungary refusing to abide by the terms of the deal and it being fundamentally undermined by the socialist government of Pedro Sánchez offering amnesty to illegal migrants, who in turn will be granted legal status throughout the internal open border Schengen Zone, a development likely untenable for many fellow member states.

Meanwhile, debate in the EU Parliament continues on the subject of so-called offshore “return hubs”, which would see illegals immediately removed to detention centres outside of the European Union rather than being allowed to remain within EU borders while their asylum claims are processed. Conservatives such as Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni have argued that such sites are necessary to deter further illegal migration and to make deportation systems effective, given that only around one in five illegals are actually sent back to their homelands per year.

On top of the continued arrival of hundreds of thousands of illegals every year, the EU is now bracing for potential migrant crises to be sparked by the conflict in the Middle East, with both Iran and Lebanon currently under fire from the United States and Israel.

In a letter to member state leaders ahead of this week’s European Council summit, Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen admitted that Brussels is concerned over the prospect of fresh waves of mass migration.

“Although the conflict has not yet resulted in immediate migration flows towards the EU, what the future holds remains uncertain and requires the full mobilization of all migration diplomacy tools at our disposal. It is therefore crucial to work with countries in the region, such as Turkey, Lebanon, and Pakistan,” she wrote, according to Italy’s Il Giornale newspaper.

Von der Leyen noted that other areas may see a rebound in the number of migrants fleeing to Europe, saying that “worrying developments are being recorded along the Central and Eastern Mediterranean routes, with a sharp increase in departures from Libya.”

Others have expressed concern as well, including Swedish Migration Minister Johan Forssel, who told POLITICO last week that  “a new refugee crisis … is not an option for us.”

“We are still seeing the consequences of what happened 10 years ago. And that’s not just the situation in Sweden, but I would say elsewhere in Europe too,” he added.

Nicholas Ioannides, deputy migration minister of Cyprus, which has come under direct fire from Iran during the conflict, warned that the EU “cannot overlook the possibility of a new refugee crisis,” adding that it “might test [the] effectiveness of the bloc’s new rules.”

Even prior to the conflict with Iran, there were concerns over the potential of a new migrant crisis from the region, with a report from the EU Agency for Asylum (EUAA) written before strikes began, warning of an “unprecedented” level of migratory flows if war broke out in Iran.

“With a population of approximately 90 million, even partial destabilisation could generate refugee movements of an unprecedented magnitude,” the report said. “Displacement of just 10 per cent of Iran’s population would rival the largest refugee flows of recent decades.”

breitbart

EU’s top court rules all 27 member nations must recognize ‘transgender’ identities

Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union – Google Maps

On March 12, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a landmark judgement ruling that all 27 EU member states must now create a functioning process for so-called “Legal Gender Recognition” (LGR) so that citizens exercising their EU right to move to a different country can be issued identity documents that match their “lived gender.” The judgement asserts the supremacy of EU law over national laws.

Specifically, the judgement targets countries such as Hungary, Slovakia, and Bulgaria, which do not permit the changing of sex on official IDs and reject the premises of gender ideology.

The case, C-43/24 Shipova, was brought by a transgender-identifying man in Italy, who has been trying for a decade to get his name and gender changed on official documents. The Bulgarian courts have denied this requests. In 2023, the Bulgarian Supreme Court issued a binding interpretation stating that lower courts cannot permit LGR; this followed a 2021 Constitutional Court ruling affirming that “sex” is biological and that the LGBT concept of “gender” does not exist in Bulgarian law.

The CJEU, however, claimed that this violates the EU right of freedom of movement within the 27 member states, and that denying citizens the right to change their sex on official documents creates “considerable inconveniences” while traveling and attempting to live out their “gender identity” in other countries and demanded that member states submit to demands of transgender activists. The judgement further stated that laws banning LGR is a denial of the “dignity and freedom” of gender-confused Europeans.

The CJEU also ruled that Bulgaria’s ban on LGR was a violation of the “right to private life” upheld by Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, even though the case in question was not about how a transgender-identifying person lived his or her life in private, but rather whether the government accepted the premises of gender ideology and formally recognized people’s chosen identity on official documents.

The ruling comes as no surprise; the European Court of Human Rights has been targeting Bulgaria’s national laws for years, most notably in 2020 in the “Y.T.” case and in 2022 in the “P.H.” case, both of which stated that Bulgaria was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights for refusing to facilitate LGR. Additionally, in September 2024, Advocate General Richard de la Tour stated in an opinion that EU member states are obligated to provide LGR to gender-confused citizens.

LGBT groups are pleased with the decision. ILGA Europe noted that the CJEU “also updated its earlier interpretation of EU gender equality law and its applicability to [so-called] trans people. The Court said that ‘to tolerate discrimination based on the difference between biological sex and gender identity’ would violate [gender-confused] persons’ respect for their dignity and freedom, which the Court has a duty to safeguard.” It is not yet clear how this might apply to other national laws that reject the premises of gender ideology.

LGBT activists are already working to build on this decision.

“As a result of today’s ruling, all pending cases in Bulgaria must be resumed without delay, and courts and authorities must issue judgements in accordance with EU law and the CJEU’s ruling in the Shipova case, said Denitsa Lyubenova of the LGBT organisation Desytvie.

At the same time, a serious legal gap remains. Bulgarian citizens who have not exercised their right to free movement are still left without an effective legal pathway to change their personal data. This highlights the urgent need for legislative reform to ensure effective protection of trans people living in Bulgaria.

“For the first time, the CJEU has interpreted EU law as requiring Member States to legally recognise ‘lived gender identity,’” stated Adina Portaru, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom International. “In doing so, it sidelines national constitutional protections of biological sex and narrows Member States’ competence over their own civil-status laws.”

In a statement posted to X, ADF International called the ruling “yet another attack on national competence and sovereignty” and noted that “When courts use back-door arguments, such as free-movement law, to reshape national civil-status rules, as they did in this case, it raises serious concerns about both democratic accountability and the protection of biological sex in law.”

lifesitenews

New UK university survey reveals widespread antisemitism on campus

Screen grab youtube

A recent survey of university students across the United Kingdom has revealed a deeply troubling picture of antisemitism on campus. The study found that one in five students hesitates or outright refuses to share an apartment with a Jewish student, highlighting ongoing discrimination in student housing and social life.

The survey, commissioned by the British Jewish Students’ Association and conducted by research firm JL Partners between late January and early February, included a representative sample of 1,000 students from 170 universities and higher education institutions throughout the UK.

The results reveal that almost a quarter of respondents (23%) had witnessed negative behavior directed at Jewish students because of their religion or ethnic background. At universities where regular anti-Israel demonstrations take place, nearly 40% of students reported frequent harassment of Jewish peers, indicating that certain campus environments may exacerbate hostility toward Jewish students.

The survey also found that around half of respondents (49%) had heard calls praising Hamas, Hezbollah, or other banned terrorist organizations on campus. Nearly the same proportion (47%) reported being exposed to justifications for the October 7, 2023 attacks. However, a large majority of 82% of students recognized that calls for a “globalization of the intifada” are antisemitic, showing awareness among most students that such rhetoric is unacceptable.

The report, titled Time for Change, highlighted extreme cases of antisemitism. In one instance, non-Jewish students posted on social media that they had “one rule only – no Jewish students in the apartment.” Jewish students recounted experiences of harassment that extended beyond campus, including threats at home, verbal abuse, and even physical attacks, demonstrating the personal toll that discrimination can take.

The survey also revealed alarming indifference toward antisemitism. A quarter of respondents (25%) said they did not particularly care-or did not care at all-if Jewish students were open about their identity on campus. Among students who witnessed antisemitism, 20% ignored it, only 22% reported it to the student union, and 23% reported it to the university administration, highlighting gaps in accountability and reporting mechanisms.

“Jewish students face direct threats, verbal and physical abuse, and isolation from their peers because of assumed views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” the report stated. “Ignorance about the Jewish people is embedded in campus culture, and too little is done in response.”

Karen Newman, vice president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, called the findings “appalling.” She said, “Jewish students should not have to worry that a fifth of their peers will refuse to live with them because they are Jewish, or about the widespread support expressed for banned terrorist groups.”

A spokesperson for Universities UK (UUK), which represents 142 universities across England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, said: “We are working closely with university leaders, the Jewish Students’ Association, and the Community Security Trust to tackle antisemitism, support leaders in taking preventive action, and respond appropriately when it occurs.”

The survey additionally found that most students feel that demonstrations on campus disrupt their studies. Students expressed frustration with protests that block access to lecture halls, libraries, and other campus facilities, indicating that the impact of antisemitism extends beyond personal harassment to affect the broader educational environment.

The report paints a stark picture of the challenges Jewish students face in UK universities, showing that antisemitism is not only present but, in some cases, tolerated or ignored. It underscores the need for stronger measures, both at the institutional and community level, to ensure that all students can study, live, and socialize in an environment free from discrimination.

israelnationalnews

Two-Thirds of Immigrants Entering Germany Have No Documents

Two-thirds of asylum seekers who entered Germany last year had no proof of identity. Almost all refugees from African countries were unable to present any identifying documents, according to asylum figures released by the Federal Ministry of the Interior.

Authorities registered 113,236 refugees over the age of 18 who applied for asylum for the first time last year. According to the Interior Ministry, 74,089 of them had no identity documents. That represents 65.4%, the highest percentage ever recorded.

In 2024, the proportion of unidentified immigrants was already significant. At that time, 72,620 out of 145,401 first-time asylum seekers over the age of 18 had no documents, representing 49.9%.

Looking further back at the statistics highlights the scale of the issue. Since 2018, according to official figures, a total of 897,699 first-time asylum seekers over the age of 18 have entered Germany. Of these, 51.5% were unable to present any identity documents.

The figures prompted criticism from Alice Weidel, leader of the right-wing populist Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. Writing on  X, she said, “Even under Merz, the government has no control over who comes into the country. A change in migration policy will only happen with the AfD!”

The Interior Ministry noted that the possibilities for clarifying the refugees’ identities can “vary considerably in individual cases … depending on the availability of consular services [of the source countries] in Germany.” According to the ministry, many countries of origin either do not cooperate with German authorities or lack functioning diplomatic representation.

In many cases, the lack of documentation among refugees from these countries can be linked to civil wars or dysfunctional bureaucracies. However, large numbers of asylum seekers also arrive without documents from countries where state institutions remain operational. For example, 93.3% of Algerians entering the country did not have identification, despite arriving from a country that is not at war and has a reasonably performing state service.

Last year, the highest share of undocumented refugees came from Guinea, with 97.9% arriving without identification documents. Other high figures include Eritrea with 91.5%, Somalia with 91.3%, and Iraq with 71.9%.

German law states that every foreigner is obligated “to present an identity document to the immigration authorities or, if identity documents are missing, to cooperate in clarifying their identity.” Despite this requirement, the proportion of unresolved identities remains particularly high among certain nationalities.

europeanconservative

German-Algerian monster jailed for 12 years after dragging ex half-naked through streets as punishment for leaving him

Landgericht Heilbronn – Google Maps

A court in Germany has sentenced a 29-year-old German-Algerian man to 12 years in prison after he subjected his former partner to a prolonged and brutal assault that left her close to death.

Judges at the Heilbronn Regional Court convicted the man of hostage-taking and aggravated assault following an attack that began after the victim ended their relationship and sought refuge in a women’s shelter.

As reported by Focus, prosecutors had argued the violence amounted to attempted murder, but the court ruled it could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to kill her.

She was forced to wear a burka, give up her job and her family and friends, and was regularly beaten if his dinner wasn’t on the table on time.

In May last year, she was hospitalized after a particularly bad beating, which gave her the courage to finally leave the abusive home. However, she was tracked down and made to endure a horrendous 30-hour-long attack.

On June 15, the man visited the women’s shelter she was staying at and beat her with his fists, before choking her and stubbing out a cigarette on her body. She was then forced to strip down to her underwear and paraded through the streets of Künzelsau, utterly humiliated.

According to regional outlet Heilbronner Stimme, the victim suffered a brain hemorrhage and permanent damage to her eyesight as a result of the attack.

Despite the severity of the offenses, the court rejected the prosecution’s argument that he intended to kill the victim, and this was reflected in his prison sentence of 12 years.

The attacker blamed his actions on an addiction to drugs and alcohol. The court ordered that he could be placed in a rehabilitation clinic for treatment after serving six years in prison.

The victim continues to suffer from panic attacks, insomnia, and chronic pain. She is now reportedly living under protection and rarely leaves home due to ongoing trauma.

rmx

Canadian Cops Arrest Man for Burning Iranian Flag; burning the Canadian flag is however legal

Burning the Canadian flag is legal. Completely legal.

A planned law that would’ve mandated the flying of the Ontario flag at all provincial buildings and banned the desecration of the Canadian flag has been scuttled by the Ford government, Global News has learned, after members of the Progressive Conservative caucus questioned the necessity of the bill. Multiple sources told Global News the proposal, spearheaded as part of a patriotism push by Minister of Citizenship and Multiculturalism Graham McGregor, would have potentially violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and may have faced court challenges.

But the Iranian flag is another matter. As usual.

After an Islamic hate rally known as Al Quds, the heroes of the Toronto police service didn’t arrest any members of the Muslim hate mob… including one who seemed to be threatening violence.

But they did arrest two Persian counterprotesters for various acts including… in the words of a police force almost as compromised as the London Met police, “the accused was then observed to be lighting an Islamic Republic of Iran flag on fire and wearing Islamic Republic of Iran flags attached to the soles of his shoes”.

What’s interesting is that these are the only ‘crimes’ that could justify the Toronto Sharia police’s charges of “public Incitement of Hatred”.

Hatred against what? The two men are Iranian. So this can’t be hatred based on ethnicity. So according to the Toronto police, protesting against the Islamic Republic of Iran is itself a hate crime.

frontpagemag

French municipal elections see National Rally and LFI surge

Riposte Laique

The right-wing National Rally (RN) made one of its strongest local breakthroughs in France during the first round of the country’s municipal elections yesterday.

In the vote, according to early results, the party won control of around 60 municipalities, compared with 11 in the previous municipal elections, showing its growing presence at the local level.

On the other side of the political spectrum, the far-left party La France Insoumise (LFI) and its allies have also made gains.

In Saint-Denis Department, a left-wing candidate won outright in the first round with 50.77 per cent of the vote, well ahead of the nearest competitor at 32 per cent, meaning no second round will be needed.

In Roubaix, the leading left-wing candidate received 47 per cent, putting the Left in a strong position before the run-off.

France’s municipal elections are held every six years and decide the members of city councils, who then elect the mayor.

The election uses a two-round system: Candidates that receive at least 10 per cent of the vote in the first round can stay in the race for the second round. Smaller groups can also join forces with larger ones between the two rounds.

The second round will take place on March 22. Candidates who want to compete must submit their final lists by tomorrow evening, which means parties only have a little time to decide whether to form alliances.

The elections are being closely watched because they are seen as an early political test before the 2027 presidential election.

With around 35,000 municipalities in France, the results give an important picture of each party’s local support.

Despite the political importance of the vote, turnout was low.

Estimates released after vote counting yesterday suggest that between 41 per cent and 45 per cent of registered voters did not take part, one of the highest-ever abstention rates for municipal elections.

Several large cities remain very competitive before the second round.

In Marseille, the Left is currently leading with 36 per cent, closely followed by the National Rally at 35 per cent, pointing to a very tight race.

In Paris, the Left is clearly ahead. The main left-wing parties, though, say they do not want to form an alliance with LFI for now, which could influence the final result.

Without a possible alliance between conservative candidate Rachida Dati (LR) and right-wing figure Sarah Knafo (Reconquête), the Right is unlikely to challenge the Left in the capital.

The coming days will therefore be decisive, as parties negotiate alliances that could shape the final results when voters return to the polls on March 22.

brusselssignal

Transgender Pedophile Sentenced After Being Caught With Child Sexual Abuse Material For The SECOND Time

A former Narragansett Regional School Committee member who “came out” as transgender days before he was arraigned on child sexual abuse charges has been sentenced to two years in prison after being caught with child abuse material for the second time. Andrew John Robinson, now known as Regina Audrey Robinson, was previously spared jail.

Robinson was first investigated in 2021 after sending four pieces of media which depicted child sexual abuse to an undercover agent through instant messaging app Kik. The app gained notoriety for its widespread use amongst pedophiles as it once allowed users to ‘Match’ and ‘Flirt’ with girls and boys from chosen age groups. 

Two FBI agents and a sergeant from the Templeton Police Department appeared at Robinson’s home and confronted him, at which time Robinson denied sending the material. Robinson initially allowed the police sergeant to watch him scroll through his phone in an effort to “prove” he had no illegal materials, but the officer caught a glimpse of a photo which appeared to depict a child. 

Robinson [L] with his then-husband, former Narragansett Selectman Ken Robinson [R].

A search warrant was obtained, and a forensic investigation of Robinson’s devices revealed his phone contained thousands of pictures and videos depicting the sexual abuse of children. The account of the person who sent the images to the undercover agent was later confirmed as being Robinson’s through the IP address and other identifying factors after an investigation that concluded in March of 2022.

Just days prior to his arraignment in July of 2022, Robinson “came out” as transgender via social media, and declared his “new name” as Audrey. In a now-deleted video posted July 4, 2022, Robinson said: “I’ve always known I was Female on the inside! I’ve lived most of my life as a Feminine Gay. I’m Transgender! My pronouns are She, Her Hers and I’m excited to continue this journey…”

He legally changed his name to Regina Audrey Robinson in October of 2023.

Following his arrest, Robinson took to social media and accused local law enforcement of being “homophobic” and “transphobic.”

Robinson ultimately pleaded guilty to felony child pornography possession, waiving his right to a jury trial. He was sentenced to three years of supervised probation, was required to register with the state as a sexual predator, attend counseling classes, and have no unsupervised contact with children under 16.

In June of 2025, Robinson was re-arrested after police learned he had been using Kik to communicate with other pedophiles about child sexual abuse.

In sickening conversations, Robinson stated he was sexually aroused by “forced young stuff,” liked to hear “squeals” in videos, claimed to have material to trade, and admitted that he would sexually abuse a child if given the opportunity. According to court documents, Robinson discussed the possibility of “borrowing” a child from a drug-addicted mother, and mentioned the idea of using Benadryl to keep the child drugged for rape.

Mid-trial, Robinson’s attorney asked to withdraw, citing a communication breakdown. Citing incidents of “misgendering,” Robinson specifically asked if a female lawyer could be assigned. Another male lawyer was ultimately appointed as his counsel.

Though Robinson attempted to use “freedom of speech” as a defense for the abhorrent messages, Assistant District Attorney Matthew Corey disagreed, instead arguing that the messages demonstrated that Robinson was seeking an opportunity to act out his fantasies. For violating the conditions of his parole, Judge Mark Goldstein handed Robinson the two-and-a-half-year maximum with credit for 134 days served.

Robinson was separately tried on a charge relating to the dissemination of child pornography based on a tip the Massachusetts State Police Cyber Crimes Unit had received from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. The tip indicated that child sexual abuse material had been disseminated online from Robinson’s Kik account.

According to the Gardner News, in February 2026, Robinson pleaded guilty to felony possession of child pornography and received an additional two-year prison sentence, to be served consecutively with his other sentence. Robinson is currently incarcerated at the Worcester County House of Correction, with a projected release date in December 2029.

Robinson is a former member of the Narragansett Regional School Committee, serving from 2014 to 2017, and ran a hairdressing business in Templeton, Massachusetts. The salon, known “Serendipity,” was located in close proximity to an elementary school. Robinson was married at the time of his initial arrest in 2022, and his husband was an attorney who formerly served on their town’s Board of Selectmen. It is unclear if the two are still together.

Local news coverage referred to Robinson by feminine pronouns.

reduxx

Merkel Blasted for Calling on Migrants to Vote Against Populist AfD Party

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel has drawn criticism for calling on migrants in Germany to vote against the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Merkel, who served as the architect of the European Migrant Crisis in 2015, when she unilaterally decided to open the EU’s borders to unprecedented waves of foreigners from the Middle East and Africa, resulting in dramatic demographic transformations in her country and across the continent, appears to have let the cat out of the bag as to her motivation for doing so.

In an interview with establishment journalist Jagoda Marinić for Hesse Broadcasting earlier this month, Merkel openly called on the migrant population of Germany — many of whom she personally allowed into the country — to vote against the political right and vote against the AfD.

“I would like people with a migration background… or with a migration history… we join forces with those who do not make common cause with the AfD.”

“I wish everyone would stand together against this party. And we do not split ourselves as a political center, I say, onto those who have a migration history and those who have none. Because then our country would become weaker against the AfD,” she continued.

“Whether a German citizen has been a German citizen for two years or for four days or the entire family for three generations, it doesn’t matter. We are the German people… We must also stick together when we have to take action against people who have completely different ideas about our future.”

The comments drew strong rebuke from AfD leader Alice Weidel, whose party currently stands as the country’s largest single party and only trails the so-called “Union” of the Christian Democrats (CDU) — the supposed centre-right party formerly led by Merkel — and the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU) by a margin of 26 to 24 per cent in the latest polling.

Responding to the former chancellor, Weidel said on Saturday: “Merkel has inflicted severe damage on Germany. In addition to the ruin of our energy infrastructure and the open borders for everyone from all over the world, she is now calling on naturalized ‘people with a migration background’ not to vote for the AfD.”

Anti-mass migration activist Naomi Seibt, who has sought asylum in the United States for fear of political persecution in Germany for her right-wing views, said of the Merkel interview: “The snake says the quiet part out loud.”

“She knows that the AfD is the MOST POPULAR party in Germany. She calls on migrants in Germany to stand together with German leftists,” Seibt said.

“She imported voters to KILL THE RIGHT (literally, judging by crime statistics),” the activist quipped.

Despite her myriad failures in office, including sparking the migrant crisis, depleting Germany’s military, eroding its industrial base with trade deals with Communist China, and rashly deciding to scrap the nation’s nuclear fleet — a move that even her former acolyte EU cheif Ursula von der Leyen admits was a mistake — Merkel was recently awarded with an “order of merit” from the European Union.

She received the award on Tuesday for her “significant contributions to European integration and European values.”

breitbart