Macron: Fake News, Not Muslim Migrants, is the Problem!

“People have claimed we were invaded by hordes of migrants and Islamists, which is totally false.”

While his country burns at the hands of the unholy Red-Green Alliance peopled by violent revolutionaries and Islamic supremacists, emasculated French President Emmanual Macron had the nerve to stand before the media and claim that immigration had nothing to do with it, and that videos and images being circulated on social media are AI-generated fake news.

So claims the fake leader of a nation collapsing from within.

frontpagemag

BBC crops a photo of a pervert nurse who abused children, to hide what was a dead giveaway

by Olivia Murray

The original story is actually a bit old, from the beginning of this year, but I definitely missed it at the time, which means a lot of other people probably did too. And it really wasn’t anything groundbreaking—one more pedophilic predator hurting children—but what the BBC chose to do in its reporting of said news is the real story.

In January 2026, the BBC ran an article on Ashley Boyd, a male hospital worked who had been employed at Swindon’s Great Western Hospital for five years, but was let go after it came to light he had been giving “unnecessary exams” to children. Specifically, testicular examinations, even after he’d been told he was not permitted to do such a thing. According to the report, Boyd “was not a qualified children’s nurse,” but had put in a request “ to work in the paediatric area of the emergency department.” When confronted, Boyd admitted he did in fact touch little boys’ private parts even though he knew these “exams” were unnecessary, though he swears it wasn’t for sexual gratification! The BBC notes that an investigation into Boyd’s conduct concluded he even continued to justify it, determining there was no real sense of “reflection” or “remediation” for his violations.

Oh, and during the time that Boyd was fondling children, he was also a top official for the Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s “LGBTQ+ network.”

Aaaand there it is, surprise, surprise.

Now, here’s the even bigger story, which went viral on X yesterday:

As you can see, the BBC cropped out the “Pride” flag buttons he’s got on his scrubs, in what would have been a dead giveaway—at least to anyone who’s intellectually honest and willing to recognize that most child predators are homosexuals—because they’d rather protect pedophiles than accept reality that the gays are deviants, and something is wrong. To anyone reading the title of the article, “Nurse carried out unnecessary exams on children,” and looking at the accompanying picture, you’d probably assume the offender was a straight man. But he was a gay man—like pedophiles usually are.

Now, it’s almost Halloween, which means my youngest is getting all excited for trick-or-treating—but there’s one house on our street he knows that we absolutely don’t visit. In fact, he’s not allowed anywhere near that house when he’s out riding his scooter, or taking his Great Dane on a walk, because it’s obvious that perverts live there: they’ve got a giant red flag hanging in one of the windows…in the form of a “Pride” flag.

Not to add, at one point, these residents had a yard “decoration” of a little baby doll straddled atop a chicken-looking figure, or a cock. I hate to have my mind in the gutter, but in context of who lives there, I can’t help but think it’s subliminal messaging. What kind of grown adult men put things like this in their yard? Perverted ones, that’s who.

When these people first bought the house, it was actually just before Halloween a few years back, so we did end up trick-or-treating there, because nothing was yet amiss. A young boy answered the door; he looked to be 15 or 16, so I assumed it was a family. Not so—the residents of the home are that young boy, however old he is, and an old man. (I’ve seen them out of the house once, walking and holding hands, and told my son that if he ever sees them, he needs to come inside immediately and tell me.)

Why can’t we all be united in protecting children from predators? Why is this only a crusade on the right? I would really love to know.

americanthinker

Europe hosts more immigrants than any other region of the world

Europe has overtaken every other region of the world as a destination for international migrants, hosting 94 million foreign-born residents in 2024, according to the United Nations International Migrant Stock dataset compiled by its Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Northern America came second, with 61 million.

The continent accounted for close to a third of the 304 million international migrants counted worldwide, a global figure that has roughly doubled since 1990 while still amounting to 3.7 per cent of the world’s population.

The European total has risen by 43 million since 1990, the largest increase of any region over that period. Migrants accounted for 12.6 per cent of the continent’s population in 2024, against 7.1 per cent in 1990.

The two leading destinations have been moving in opposite directions. Northern America has added 34 million migrants since 1990, though its growth has slowed to below 1 per cent a year since 2020, down from 3.8 per cent a year in the 1990s and 2.3 per cent in the following decade.

Europe’s intake accelerated over the same years. The UN attributed part of that to refugee flows caused by the Ukraine war.

The growth is heavily concentrated in a handful of countries. Germany hosted 16.8 million foreign-born residents, more than any country other than the United States, followed by the United Kingdom with 11.8 million, France with 9.2 million, Spain with 8.9 million and Italy with 6.6 million.

Spain has changed fastest. Its foreign-born population stood at 814,000 in 1990 and 6.3 million in 2010, and the increase recorded since 2000, of roughly 6.8 million people, is the largest of any current EU member state.

Measured against population size, the ranking shifts. Foreign-born residents made up 51.2 per cent of the population in Luxembourg, 37 per cent in Malta, 25.5 per cent in Austria, 23.1 per cent in Ireland and 21.4 per cent in Sweden, against 4.5 per cent in Poland and 3.4 per cent in Romania.

The split runs between west and east rather than between large and small member states. The foreign-born share reached 19.8 per cent in Germany and 18.5 per cent in Spain, roughly four times the Polish figure and close to six times the Romanian one.

Only Oceania recorded a higher regional share than Europe, at 21 per cent of residents. Asia hosted 92.2 million migrants, almost as many as Europe in absolute terms, but they amounted to 1.9 per cent of its population.

Much of the movement is internal to the continent. The UN found that 74 per cent of European-born migrants living abroad were in another European country, a pattern it did not record anywhere else at that scale.

The largest flow into Europe from outside came from Northern Africa and Western Asia, at 13 million people, followed by Central and Southern Asia at 10 million.

Poland shows how fast the picture can turn. It hosted 1.13 million foreign-born residents in 1990 and 650,000 in 2010, before climbing to 1.74 million in 2024. Women made up 59.5 per cent of that population, the highest proportion in any EU member state and a direct result of the arrivals from Ukraine, which itself still hosted 5.1 million foreign-born residents, or 13.4 per cent of its population.

Women and girls accounted for 48 per cent of international migrants worldwide, though they were in the majority in France, Spain, Italy and Sweden.

The dataset also shows how much of the recent increase is involuntary. One in six international migrants worldwide had been forcibly displaced across a border, the highest share since the 1950s, when the global refugee series begins. The UN counted 51.7 million refugees, asylum seekers and others in need of international protection by mid-2024, with 18 million of them added since 2010.

The data cover the years before the European Union’s Pact on Migration and Asylum took effect on June 12 and before member states gave final approval to the returns regulation on October 1. Both were presented in Brussels as the instruments that would finally give the bloc control of its external borders.

Seven weeks after the pact entered into application, more than 70,000 people crossed from Morocco during the invasion of the Spanish city of Ceuta on July 30 and 31, the largest such crossing on record. The European Commission said afterwards that the system had held, because almost all those who entered were returned and none reached the mainland.

The pressure has not eased since. Illegal immigration into Spain has continued to climb this year even as the rest of the European Union records sharp falls, leaving the member state with the largest migrant intake of the century also carrying much of the bloc’s current border burden.

brusselssignal

Hungary: Péter Magyar’s decision to invite the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, was a “disgrace” and a “humiliation”

Screengrab youtube

Member of the European Parliament for the Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk Mozgalom), Zsuzsanna Borvendég has called Péter Magyar’s decision to invite the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, “shame” and “humiliation”. 

When asked about Péter Magyar’s decision to invite the Commission President to the 70th anniversary celebrations of the 1956 uprising during an interview, the Hungarian politician called it “absolutely staggering, unacceptable, and outrageous—after all, we are talking about a national holiday. Even looking at it from that perspective alone, there is simply no place for this; we do not need foreign politicians—politicians from outside our nation—to deliver speeches on our national holiday”, said Ms. Borvendég.

She continued by saying that “the Hungarian people—the Hungarian nation—rose up against an imperial occupation. It is therefore unacceptable that the current Hungarian rump regime would invite a representative of a different imperial power, a different colonial master. For that is all she truly is—let that be clear.

They are inviting a colonial master to deliver a commemorative speech on the anniversary of our fight for freedom—the 70th anniversary—thereby humiliating not only the dignity of the national holiday but the entire Hungarian nation.”

“Incidentally, it is also an immense disgrace what happened on the 50th anniversary—as we know, Ferenc Gyurcsány (former socialist PM, ed. note) ruined that occasion. And now, the 70th anniversary—even compared to that—is an absolute scandal. It is truly an all-time low”, warned the Our Homeland MEP.

“It is, therefore, unacceptable and outrageous. One could analyze at length what 1956 was truly about, …demonstrating that the Hungarian nation had no desire for the West, either. It was not merely a resistance against Soviet occupation and communist oppression; there was also a rejection of the West—though, in truth, the West did not exactly offer itself either. In 1956, the West abandoned the Hungarian nation. It had encouraged and led the Hungarians to believe that help was on the way—that the American military and NATO would arrive. Yet, it provided no assistance whatsoever; it left the Hungarian nation to its fate.

And now, Ursula von der Leyen arrives as a representative of an empire that, back in 1956, effectively stood by while the Hungarian nation was left to drown in its own blood,”

Zsuzsanna Borvendég said.

In her opinion, Von der Leyen’s visit “threatens to completely obscure the narrative of ’56—a narrative that is crucial to emphasize—in which the Hungarian nation essentially declared: “No, thank you—I want no part of any ‘isms.’ I am Hungarian, and a Hungarian is neither right-wing nor left-wing; simply national and Hungarian. At that time, Hungary proclaimed neutrality; it did not wish to join NATO or any other imperial alliance system, but rather sought to pursue a neutral and independent path. With the arrival of Ursula von der Leyen, this particular narrative of ’56 is effectively set to be completely buried, closed her words Zsuzsanna Borvendég.

Apart from the president, many high-level European politicians will attend the commemorations, almost all of them from the liberal, euro-federalist spectrum. Among them is

  • the President of the European Council, António Costa (Socialist Party).
  • Maia Sandu, the ultra-liberal President of the Republic of Moldova (Party of Action and Solidarity)
  • Serbian Prime Minister Đuro Macut (unaffiliated).
  • Former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg (Norwegian Labour Party), currently serves as Minister of Finance.
  • The President of the Czech Senate, Miloš Vystrčil (Civic Democratic Party).
  • Federal Minister of Transport Steffen Bilger (CDU), Peter Tschentscher (SPD), the Mayor of Hamburg.
  • Austria’s Christine Schwarz-Fuchs (ÖVP), and former Chancellor, Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg (ÖVP)
  • Estonia’s liberal politician Liisa Pakosta (Estonia 200), Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs.
  • Ireland’s Thomas Byrne, Minister of State for European Affairs (Fianna Fáil  – Renew Europe, ALDE).
  • Vincent Van Peteghem (Christian Democratic and Flemish, EPP), Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium,
  • Zoran Stevanović, among the few right-wingers, from the Slovenian Resnica.

hungarytoday

Food Riots & Rationing Are Coming to Britain & Europe: Economist Who Predicted 2008

{YouTube CC-BY 4.0}

In this clip from his longer interview, host Rafe Heydel-Mankoo is joined by one of the world’s most famous heterodox economists, Prof. Steve Keen, Honorary Professor at University College London and one of the few economists to have correctly predicted the global financial crisis of 2008.

He warns that the world is teetering on the edge of a once in a lifetime global crash. It could be brought on in a matter of weeks due to energy crisis brought about by lack of supplies through the Straits of Hormuz combined with one of the strongest El Ninos on record. Added to this is the risk of an epic financial meltdown when the US AI bubble bursts.

Irish gov’t demonizes mothers by going after ‘tradwife influencers’

The Irish government is waging a quiet war on traditional wives and mothers, dressed up as a campaign for women’s “equality.” 

The Journal claimed that this has been “debunked,” but the Irish government’s strategy is transparent enough to those who read its documents. They don’t want Irish women so much as listening to “tradwives” who promote the traditional lifestyle of staying at home to care for one’s children, home and husband.

How do we know this? The government’s admission is in their recently issued three-year Action Plan designed to implement last year’s National Strategy for Women and Girls 2025-2030, which aims to achieve “gender equality” for women.

That National Strategy decries “tradwife influencers” who “seek to promote restrictive, stereotypical roles for women and girls.” It also disparages “patriarchal norms, often focused on men as decision-makers and breadwinners and on women as carers.” (Read: mothers)

It claims these norms “uphold harmful stereotypes and limit life opportunities, preventing women from pursuing particular career paths and economic opportunities and inhibiting men’s likelihood of engaging in caring roles for their children or Dependants.”

It is clear here that the government views the promotion of the role of stay-at-home mother and wife as harmful.

Accordingly, its 2026-2028 Action Plan for its National Strategy for Women and Girls states that one national goal is to “Reduce people’s exposure to harmful gender norms and stereotypes, including in online spaces.”

Even to a disinterested observer, such an aim should seem strange. If the government truly cared about women and respected their autonomy and judgment, it would allow women to hear different points of view and make up their own mind about whether they want to devote themselves full time to motherhood or not.

The Irish government’s goals, like those of so many institutions that are falling in lockstep with the globalist agenda, reveal an ideological bias that clearly does not regard staying at home to mother one’s children and entering the workforce as two equally valuable choices.

Whether its proponents recognize it or not, this agenda seeks to weaken and undermine motherhood as well as the family. 

It is, in fact, a poisonous agenda. It seeks to perpetuate one root cause of so many of today’s societal ills — women’s neglect of the care of their children in favor of focusing on their career. 

This does not mean women are intentionally or consciously neglecting their children, or even that they want to be in the workforce instead of at home, because many women feel they are financially forced to take on a job outside the home. Or is working at home while caring for one’s children equivalent to taking a job outside the home and putting kids in daycare.

Children’s separation from their mothers has a more profound negative impact than many realize. A prominent psychoanalyst has warned in recent years, for example, that daycare is “absolutely terrible” for children age three and younger due to their spike in stress levels resulting from separation from their mother.

“(S)tudies show that babies who are put in daycare have very, very high salivary cortisol levels,” Dr. Erica Komisar pointed out, referring to the main human stress hormone. These cortisol levels are “through the roof in babies who are separated from their mothers or primary attachment figures under the age of three.”

“And so when you raise those levels of stress hormones in the brain, it actually doesn’t allow the brain to develop in a normal way. It ends up forcing the brain to develop in a pathologically adaptive, neurologically compromised way,” Komisar warned. 

For this reason alone, the government should be encouraging women to stay at home with their children, not discouraging it by seeking to suppress, censor, and hide the voices of tradwife influencers. 

It is not only the healthy psychological development of its future citizens at stake but the well-being of the very women it claims to serve and the happiness of its families. 

As CNBC has reported, based on Gallup research, “Women have reported higher levels of burnout than men for years, a gap that has more than doubled since 2019.”

The agenda of suppressing the traditional role of wife and mother in fact suggests an anti-woman, anti-feminine bias according to which women have greater value if they have a career, taking on the traditionally masculine role of breadwinner.

The idea that women need to be “protected” from “tradwife” ideas further suggests that women are like children, whose intellects are too undeveloped to assess their own lifestyle options.

This crusade against traditional motherhood should make Irish women stop and think: Is this really about women’s empowerment, or something else?

lifesitenews

Latest poll in the German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt: AfD at 47 per cent! CDU in single figures at just 8 per cent

If an election were to be held in Saxony-Anhalt next Sunday, the AfD could achieve a record result of around 47 per cent. This is according to the latest poll by Prognos.

The people of Saxony-Anhalt continue to support the AfD. In the latest Prognos poll, the AfD achieved a record result of 47 per cent. This makes the AfD THE people’s party in the state compared to the other parties. Not even the CSU in Bavaria can boast such figures.

The BSW would once again clear the five per cent threshold. Should the BSW and the AfD enter into a tacit alliance, this would secure an absolute majority in the state parliament in Magdeburg.

The Christian Democratic Union, by contrast, is in single figures. The left-wing bloc (the Greens, the SPD and The Left) would together account for 34 per cent, which is still significantly weaker than the AfD on its own.

Here are the latest poll results from Prognos dated October 21, 2026:

FREIE WELT

Germany plans to force social media platforms to fill 20% of algorithmic recommendations with ‘state-approved’ content

Medforth AI

Germany’s federal states are proposing that social media platforms reserve at least 20 percent of algorithmic recommendations for content from a pool of approved media outlets deemed important for opinion diversity, according to a draft under public consultation. The proposed measure is already being slammed as a state-mandated propaganda effort that would force German citizens to view content friendly to the ruling establishment parties.

The measure is part of the second stage of a planned Digital Media State Treaty developed by the Broadcasting Commission of the Federal States. Under the draft, public broadcasters such as ARD, ZDF and Deutschland Radio would automatically qualify for certain offerings.

Meanwhile, private outlets would generally need to apply and demonstrate that they meet criteria including news and political reporting, information and educational content, documentaries, local or regional coverage, original journalistic production, editorial staffing and accessibility standards. Approvals would be decided by the 14 state media authorities.

In other words, the state wants to control what people are seeing in their feeds.

As the Berliner Zeitung reports, the media law involves “media quotas with an advantage for ARD and ZDF,” which are two state broadcasters that already have a massive advantage over private competitors. Both outlets, which are notoriously in favor of mass migration and known for their anti-AfD bias, and which employ virtually all left-wing journalists, are already known for not playing on a level playing field.

Austrian remigration activist Martin Sellner, along with other right-leaning accounts, already are warning about the new plans.

The rule would apply to algorithmic recommendations shown to users, such as in feeds or under videos on platforms including Instagram and X. Content drawn from the approved pool would still be selected according to the platforms’ algorithms and user interests. Officials have framed the quota as a way to protect journalistic content from being sidelined by engagement-driven material.

However, skepticism is obviously abundant.

“And who gets this golden seal of quality for preferential playback completely automatically? Of course, the public broadcasters. Private publishers, on the other hand, get to play the supplicants and politely apply for the status at the so-called “state-independent” media authorities. A rogue mind thinks evil of it,” wrote commentator Bernd Kaiser.

“If you want to exchange views on X in the future, the algorithm will soon forcibly serve you the curated explainer journalism from Tagesschau — right between your friends’ posts. They’re selling us this unprecedented market intervention as ‘Public Value,’ but it’s a blatant attempt to secure air superiority over online discourse,” he added.

The draft was released for public comment in late September 2026, with submissions accepted until Nov. 13. It builds on an existing “public value” system that already grants preferential placement to certain media apps in app stores and on smart-TV interfaces. Some private broadcasters, such as those already holding “public-value” status, would also be eligible for the pool.

The Berliner Zeitung, a private newspaper, noted that state-funded broadcasters could expand their visibility relative to private competitors that rely on advertising or subscriptions. Critics have also pointed out that the criteria emphasize structural and production features of outlets rather than the range of viewpoints in individual posts, and that there is limited evidence the specific 20 percent threshold would increase actual diversity of perspectives

The Digital Media State Treaty is being prepared in two parts. The first, focused largely on implementing European Union rules including aspects of the AI Act, has already advanced. Part two remains a discussion draft and would require agreement by the governments and subsequent ratification by the parliaments of all 16 German states before it could take effect.

Media regulation in Germany is primarily a responsibility of the states under the country’s dual public-private broadcasting system.

rmx

French counter-protestors march to take back streets from leftist rioters

Videos spreading across social media appear to show counter-protestors taking to the streets of France, described as affiliated with “right-wing” groups, in an attempt to dispel leftist rioting that has overtaken cities.

The New York Post reports that more than half a million people “flooded” French streets over the weekend across 140 distinct protests, with looting, arson, vandalism, and clashes with overwhelmed police, ostensibly to demand “major spending concessions in the cost of living, as well as in higher education, teacher salaries, rising living costs, and to protect pensions and public services from budget cuts.” Cars, city halls, schools, and more have all been targets. 

The spectacle was an escalation of protests that began earlier this month and quickly turned violent, forcing the closure of hundreds of schools as rioters set buildings on fire and desecrated religious and historical monuments. 

“Let them come and get me!” French president Emmanuel Macron has reportedly declared in response. “There is no place for violence in the Republic. Those who broke, attacked and looted will be brought to justice and punished. To the law enforcement authorities, who enable the right to protest, I express the nation’s support. We will stand united against those who sow chaos.”

Over the weekend, videos have begun to spread across X of another faction: counter-protesters, marching in cities such as Lyon and Rouen, to confront the protestors with defiant chants of “this is our home” and “the street belongs to us,” singing of the French national anthem, and at least one rally in support of small businesses devastated by the violence. At least one video shows violence breaking out between the two sides.

It is not yet clear who all is participating or what level of organization is behind the response, but one symbol that can be spotted in the footage is a flag bearing a Celtic cross, commonly used by several “ultra-nationalist” French movements. The Guardian reports that “far-right” leaders such as Marine Le Pen have blamed the chaos on ineffective left-wing governance and the consequences of uncontrolled mass migration.

Fox News reports that, contrary to sympathetic framing of the initial leftist protests as a student uprising, it has identified “101 organizations across 9 countries – including the U.S. – that are coordinating, organizing or amplifying protests in Europe,” more than two-thirds of which are led by adults rather than students.

Further, the organizers “represent a nexus of the ‘red-green’ alliance, merging Islamist organizations that are symbolized by the color green, and far-left, communist and socialist groups represented by the color red,” including several groups that embrace the “Antifa” label, such as Action AntiFa16.

The Associated Press reports that Paris saw a night of calm on Tuesday after the arrests of more than 2,000 people and the imposition of curfews, though it remains to be seen how long the lull will last. The French National Assembly is opening an investigation into the outbreak and police response.

lifesitenews