Abortion Is a Luxury Europe Cannot Afford

On April 4, the governor of Russia’s Novgorod region made an extraordinary statement at an event on boosting birthrates. “We’ve had these small victories, but that’s not enough,” Gleb Nitkin said while discussing a 30% drop in the abortion rate. “The [demographic] situation in our country is critical, and allowing elective abortions is too big a luxury. Our task is to try to prevent such cases—not through bans, but through high-quality work, care, and responsibility.” 

Cynics might rightly point out that Russia’s desperate demographic need stems in part from their horrifying losses on the front lines of the war in Ukraine, which are approaching 1.2 million by some estimates. Nonetheless, Nitkin is correct: Abortion is a luxury that Western countries cannot afford if they want their civilizations to survive (a question for another day). Few conservatives will say this out loud for fear of sounding like Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, who signed Decree 770 in 1967, restricting abortion and contraception to boost the birthrate. It is nonetheless indisputably true.

Consider the grotesque numbers. As the West enters a deep demographic winter, abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide in 2025, with an estimated 73 million babies killed in the womb. The abortion rate in England and Wales has soared to 30% of recorded conceptions. Annabel Denham got close to saying the quiet part out loud in The Telegraph last month, noting that abortion has become “a mass phenomenon”:

At precisely the moment when we are worrying about the economic and societal implications of too few births, we are also presiding over historically high rates of abortion. Had numbers in 2023 been in line with 2015, there could have been roughly 15 per cent more births. That is not a rounding error; it’s a demographic fact with long-term impact.

Of course, she hastened to add, “None of this is to argue against abortion rights. The case for bodily autonomy—to the current limit of 24 weeks—is, to my mind, irrefutable.” A baby boy born prematurely at 21 weeks in Iowa in 2024 survived outside the womb and turned one year old last July.

In France, there are over a quarter of a million abortions annually. In the Netherlands, nearly 40,000. In Germany and Spain, over 100,000 each. In Europe overall, the average annual butcher’s bill stands at between 3 and 3.5 million abortions, which is more than the collective populations of eight EU countries. Only 5% of the world’s babies are projected to be born in Europe in 2026. The fertility crisis is, without doubt, a many-headed hydra—but it is also true that abortion is ending the lives of millions before they are even born.

Progressive politicians are hellbent on increasing these numbers. Despite technological advances pushing the age of viability earlier and earlier, Denmark and Norway recently raised their abortion limits. France and Luxembourg enshrined abortion as a constitutional right. The UK decriminalized abortion until birth last year; the vote in Westminster was 379 to 137. That, at least, seemed to shock some Britons awake; one MP called Labour “the party of baby killers.” Andrew Lilico of the Telegraph put it bluntly: “We’ve voted to kill our old, our sick, & our infants. We deserve everything that’s coming to us.”

What’s coming is grim. Louise Perry, who describes herself as “uneasily agnostic” about abortion but opposed to criminalization, observed in a 2024 essay that our collective decision to abandon procreation is “modernity’s self-destruct button,” and,

The people on whom modernity depends are failing to reproduce themselves, which means that modernity itself is failing to reproduce itself. Most voters have no idea that this is happening. Nor do most politicians. But it is happening nonetheless, and we are experiencing its early stages in the form of diverse political crises across the modern world.

It is incredibly frustrating to see so many on the Right obsess over these multiplying crises while steadfastly avoiding the issue of abortion. Mass migration; Islamization; the strained social welfare systems creaking under the weight of an aging population supported by fewer and fewer young people; the inevitable euthanasia proposals to cynically thin out top-heavy family trees—all of this comes down, in part, to the fact that we are not having babies. Worse, we are killing millions of babies every single year. Luxury infanticide.

Right-wing politicians will insist that majorities across Europe support abortion rights. Hungary, however, is a compelling model for how leaders can work within that reality to move the Overton window on abortion and reduce the abortion rate. Hungary is not ready for sweeping protections for children in the womb, but the government has prepared for that moment. In 2012, the Fidesz government passed a new constitution recognizing that the right to life begins at conception, while leaving in place Hungary’s 12-week abortion limit, creating a foundation for restricting abortion.

Additionally, abortion pills are illegal in Hungary, and in September 2022, the government required that women seeking an abortion hear the fetal heartbeat before proceeding, with doctors having to submit confirmation that this took place. Combined with a raft of pro-marriage and pro-child policies that have been one of the government’s key focuses, the abortion rate has halved since 2003. Viktor Orbán took power in 2011; if abortion rates had continued at 2010 levels, approximately 300,000 fewer babies would have been born. More bluntly, approximately 300,000 more babies would have been aborted.

Critics might rightly respond that protecting pre-born children in the womb will not, by itself, boost the birthrate. Indeed, countries with pro-life regimes like Poland (which faces relentless and illegal attacks from Donald Tusk) and Malta (which recently rejected attempts to overturn pro-life laws) still have birthrates far below replacement level. But pro-life laws—as well as attempts to consciously build a pro-life culture—save hundreds of thousands of lives. The collective effects of these attempts—and these lives—are a cultural force multiplier that cannot be underestimated.

There is another, more solemn reason that abortion is a luxury that we cannot afford. Babies were once rightly understood as divine blessings. That understanding prompted previous generations to embrace new life despite economic and social circumstances far grimmer than those now cited as key reasons for the surge in prenatal infanticide in the UK and elsewhere. But when we reject those children—when we carve “Return to Sender” into their tiny corpses and toss them back into eternity—we provoke divine wrath, and we cannot expect to prosper.

A civilization without children does not have a future. A civilization that kills its own children does not deserve one. 

europeanconservative

‘The Government Doesn’t Run The Government’: Starmer Insists He Won’t Resign Over Mandelson-Epstein Scandal

Lord Peter Mandelson, half-naked in the DOJ-released Files, is experiencing the ‘Epstein curse’ in a big way – and it can get worse.

Calls mount for the British Prime Minister to resign as the Mandelson-Epstein scandal leaves Starmer’s spin doctors having to argue that he is ignorant and not in command of his own government, rather than admit that he has been “deliberately dishonest”.

One of Britain’s most senior Civil Servants, Sir Oliver ‘Olly’ Robbins was sacked on Thursday night after it was revealed that the Labour grandee hand-picked to be the Ambassador to the United States, Peter Mandelson, actually failed his security services vetting process but was appointed anyway. Mandelson was Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s political appointee, and the official version of events is being treated with high suspicion, but Downing Street insists Starmer will not be resigning over the matter, leaving Robbins to play the “sacrificial lamb”.

On Friday morning, after Robbins’ overnight ouster Prime Minister Starmer employed his usual rhetorical approach of portraying himself as a member of the aggrieved public, and a victim of events, rather than as the leader of the government. Laying out his version of events, that Robbins secretly and unilaterally approved Mandelson to be ambassador despite being a known security risk, Starmer told broadcasters from Paris, where he is co-hosting a defence summit:

That I wasn’t told that Peter Mandelson when he was appointed is staggering. That I wasn’t told that he’d failed security vetting when I was telling Parliament that due process had been followed is unforgivable. I was not told, no minister was told, and I’m absolutely furious about that. What I intend to do is go to Parliament on Monday to set out all the relevant facts in true transparency, so Parliament has the full picture.

So while it is as of now the official government position is the Prime Minister shouldn’t have to resign because he has no idea what’s going on in his own government, and this exculpates him from responsibility for the consequences of his own decisions, critics appear unconvinced. The Daily Telegraph cites Westminster insiders that nobody in the Civil Service believes the official version of events, and that it is ridiculous to say “shrewd political operator” Robbins would have decided to unilaterally overrule the vetting process without telling anyone.

The paper further states today that Robbins had months ago told friends he was fearful of being set up as a “fall guy” and was determined not to be stitched up to save Starmer’s skin over the Mandelson crisis.

Brexit pioneer and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, accused the Prime Minister of dishonesty, and of having misled the country, and called on him to resign. Sacked Civil Service Robbins is no friend to the right, Farage said while noting his malignant influence during the Brexit era, but nevertheless is very highly intelligent and capable and consequently “there is absolutely no way” he would do something so stupid.

Mr Farage said “not a single word” of the official denial by Starmer’s spokesman this morning was “believable in any way. He added on Robbins: “I disagree with is politics… [but] there is no way a man like that would unilaterally make a decision of this kind. And equally, the Prime Minister cannot stand up and say that Mandelson passed security vetting and now claim later that he wasn’t told. That’s not incompetence, even Keir Starmer isn’t that incompetent. It’s outright, blatant dishonesty.”

Starmer clinging on to power flies in the face of his own standards for the office of the Prime Minister, as expressed while he was in opposition and flaunted as virtues at election-time. Indeed, according to Sir Keir Starmer himself, whether the Prime Minister lied to Parliament and the country, or if he was ignorant of the goings-on in his own government, both are unacceptable in a leader, who had long claimed before he took power that leaders should understand “the buck stops here“.

Also speaking out today on the unfolding crisis of competence and accountability in the British government is Danny Kruger, a former Conservative brought into Reform by Farage to prepare the party for government, a back-room operation charged with doing deep thinking on the biggest problems standing in the way of good governance.

Reflecting on the facts as they appear, Kruger stated it is now the case that “the Government doesn’t run the government”, noting the downstream effects of the Tony Blair-era project to depoliticise politics by taking power and responsibility away from elected officials and shunting it away to civil servants and arms-length bodies, known as Quangos. He said:

It’s almost incredible they weren’t told. Either way the system is totally out of control. Politicians who won’t lead; unaccountable officials in charge, and laws to stop them telling ministers the facts.

…The issue isn’t just that the PM is so weak he hides behind ‘process’ on everything – it’s that the system deliberately enables this, giving ministers high-sounding principles (‘independent vetting’) to evade responsibility. So the Kafkaesque scenario of the PM defending himself with the claim ‘process was followed’ when the process simply meant ‘nothing to do with the PM’.

There aren’t many people left in British politics at this stage who aren’t calling for the Prime Minister to resign. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said this morning that whatever version of events now proves to be true, “all roads lead to a resignation”. She said: “At some point, there is deliberate dishonesty whether it’s the cover-up story or the original story. One of these is deliberate dishonesty. They can’t all be true, that’s why I know he is lying.”

The Green Party, presently enjoying record-high polling on the back of Labour’s failures, also called for Starmer to step down. Their leader Zack Polanski said: “There’s no way today should end without Starmer’s resignation. Any other outcome would an absurd scenario where this Labour Government, and all in it, would be laughing in our faces”.

breitbart

Italy: 7 suspects, all with African and Asian foreign backgrounds, arrested for gang raping 23-year-old woman in Cesena

Illustration Medforth AI

Another harrowing gang rape case has hit Italy, this time with seven suspects, all with foreign backgrounds, charged for raping a 23-year-old victim in the Cesena countryside and filming the crime.

The victim was allegedly abused and filmed by seven youths during a drug-fueled party in early April. The suspects, described as being “born in the city but of African and Asian origins,” are aged between 19 and 25.

They reportedly took advantage of the victim’s state of intoxication, but the films they recorded on their phones may now be the deciding piece of evidence in their case.

Following the ordeal, the young woman – who is described as being “born in Cesena, but of foreign origin” – sought medical attention at an emergency room, where doctors identified injuries that corroborated her account of violence, according to Italian outlet il Resto del Carlino.

Italian police in Cesena, supported by the Bologna Dog Unit, have arrested suspects in connection with the case and seized 15 cell phones to analyze “hours” of footage that allegedly captured the assault. According to the victim, who was familiar with “her tormentors,” the violence escalated from a single individual to the entire group.

Investigators believe the footage will be critical in breaking the “cloud of secrecy” surrounding the event.

In addition to the sexual assault investigation, one 23-year-old suspect, thought to have also been involved in the gang rape, was arrested for “detention for the purpose of dealing in narcotic substances, resisting a public official, illegal possession of weapons and ammunition.”

When this suspect’s house was raided, police discovered a stash of 530 grams of hashish and 30 grams of cocaine. During the police raid, the young man attempted to dispose of narcotics by throwing them into a river. He is currently being held in detention.

The Forlì Public Prosecutor’s Office has ordered searches of the residences of the other six suspects. As the investigation continues, authorities have not ruled out the application of further “precautionary measures” against all those involved.

Remarkably, 43 percent of all sexual crimes in Italy are committed by foreigners despite making up a much smaller portion of the population.

rmx

Why Does the European Commission Support the Muslim Brotherhood?

Medforth AI

The European Commission, the unelected executive arm of the European Union, assured Europeans in 2019 that it was not spending their hard-earned taxpayer money on supporting the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). In response to a question by Charlie Weimers, a Swedish Member of European Parliament, about the Commission’s funding of the MB, European Commission Vice President Margaritis Schinas said:

“[T]he European Commission does not finance extremists. On the contrary, we have very strong oversight and audit of our financing… and if you have evidence to the contrary, I would be very interested to have it.”

Weimers later supplied the Commission with the requested evidence. In October 2021, the European Conservatives and Reformists Group (ECR Group), a center-right political group in the European Parliament, of which Wiemers is a member, published a report they had commissioned from researchers Paul Stott and Tommaso Virgili, “Network of Networks: The Muslim Brotherhood in Europe.” Wiemers wrote in the report’s introduction:

“The aim of this report is stimulate a debate on what new policies we need to institute to prevent the spread of Islamism in Europe. My ambition is to persuade the European Commission to change its policy and stop all contributions to Islamist organisations.”

According to the report:

“… European institutions demonstrate a continued record of engagement with and support for Muslim Brotherhood-related organisations. The most visible examples occur in the form of direct funding.”

Weimers did not succeed, however, in getting the European Commission to stop these contributions. According to a report published by the ECR Group in December 2025, “Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood. Brotherism, Islamophobia and the EU,” written by Tommaso Virgili and Florence Bergeaud-Blackler, the European Commission is still funding Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations that “exploit EU funding and institutions to advance their agenda.” The authors write:

“The report identifies insufficient financial oversight, allowing EU funds to support extremist groups or to amplify their illiberal ideologies. It also warns against a legitimization effect produced by the engagement of EU institutions with Brotherist narratives and structures.”

Among the Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations that the EU funds is the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), an “anti-racism network” that advocates “for better EU anti-racism policies and legislation.” ENAR received €23 million ($26.4 million) from the EU in the years spanning 2007-2020 and its director from 2010 to 2021, Michaël Privot, a convert to Islam, admitted in an article in Belgian news outlet Le Soir in 2008 that he was affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, before claiming to denounce the organization in 2012.

A bit hard for the EU, therefore, to feign ignorance.

ENAR is active in fighting “Islamophobia”, a strategic tool used by the Muslim Brotherhood to shut down all criticism of Islam, in coalition with a whole slew of other MB-linked organizations in Europe, according to the report.

“… ENAR has been in the forefront of the battle against Islamophobia. It has even coordinated a ‘European Coalition Against Islamophobia’ that was, in fact a ‘network of Brotherist influencers’ comprising some of the most influential organizations and individuals of the Brotherhood nebula….”

What is even more concerning is that the opinions of this network appear to carry a lot of weight with highly placed EU decision-makers:

“ENAR enjoys a great deal of material and immaterial benefits from the European Commission… Moreover, ENAR is frequently involved as a partner and consultant in different initiatives sponsored by the Commission or EU agencies. In 2021, for instance, it took part in a roundtable on ‘racial and climate justice’ along with EC Vice-President Frans Timmermans and in another meeting concerning the European Climate Pact. It also delivered the opening speech at the European Commission’s 6th Migration Forum. In 2023, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights shared on its social media, and later deleted, a call for a “march against Islamophobia” promoted by ENAR and other Brotherist organizations… Additionally, ENAR prides itself on engaging with multiple political groups at the European Parliament and on influencing documents and reports from the European Commission, European Parliament and the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).”

Between 2007 and 2019, the MB-linked Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO) received €288,856 ($331,000) of EU funding across various projects, according to the report. Even though EU-funding has apparently stopped since then, EU institutions continue to legitimize the organization, the ECR Group report’s authors write:

“In July 2023, the Commission stated that no EU funded project featuring FEMYSO was still running.

“Yet, beyond the matter of financial support, FEMYSO represents another towering example of the different forms of legitimization EU institutions bestow on Brotherist entities. FRA explicitly admits its cooperation with FEMYSO, and, in 2023, it advertised on social media the FEMYSO-led ‘march against Islamophobia’… The Commission and the Parliament, too, engage with FEMYSO. In November 2021, Commissioner Helena Dalli tweeted about her meetings with FEMYSO members. This happened the same month as Dalli promoted the controversial FEMYSO campaign to mainstream the hijab…”

Why is the European Commission seeking out the opinions of Muslim Brotherhood groups and bestowing legitimacy on them?

Charlie Wiemers, in the report’s foreword, writes that EU support of the Muslim Brotherhood has become a self-perpetuating vicious cycle of growing legitimacy, seemingly created both by ideology, bureaucratic inertia and basic incompetence.

“Political directives often push grant-giving bodies to prioritize or earmark funds for minority-run or minority-serving organizations. This, combined with officials’ unfamiliarity with this totalitarian religious-ideology, gives Brotherhood-affiliated groups an edge. They can get funding and legitimacy that other totalitarian groups would never dream of getting….

“[T]hese organizations play a clever game of dominoes, leveraging legitimacy in one member state to gain credibility in another or at the European level, then using that to charm more grant-making bodies. This creates a vicious cycle of ever-growing legitimacy and funding from multiple sources….

“[O]ur monitoring systems are toothless when it comes to catching deviations from a grant’s purpose. If an organization claims to uphold European values, authorities take it at face value. Denying funding for failing to align with those values requires ironclad evidence, but monitoring isn’t built to scrutinize content. A few missteps are brushed off as one-offs, and any official who dares push back risks accusations of racism or ‘Islamophobia’—a chilling effect that will prevent most officials from acting unless they are extraordinarily principled and courageous.”

This is not only extraordinary, but potentially fatal. An unelected and deeply undemocratic institution – the European Commission – is boosting the Muslim Brotherhood, spending taxpayer money on it, and legitimizing it. Why?

gatestoneinstitute

A citizen-funded documentary highlights the largest cross in Christendom and sparks a historical and political debate in Spain

Wikimedia Commons, Godot13, CC-BY-SA-4.0

In the heart of Spain stands one of the world’s most impressive monuments: the largest cross in Christendom, located in the monumental complex of the Valley of Cuelgamuros (formerly the Valley of the Fallen). It is not only a colossal architectural work, but also a symbol laden with religious, historical, and cultural significance.

A recent documentary, funded through public donations, seeks to explain its origin, defend its value, and warn against what many consider an attempt to erase part of history.

A unique monument in the world.

The cross at the Valley of Cuelgamuros is recognized as the largest in the world (Guinness Book of World Records). Its height reaches 152.4 meters (including the base), with arms 24 meters long each, visible from dozens of kilometers away. It was built between 1940 and 1958, in the post-war period, as part of a complex that includes a basilica carved into the rock (262 meters long, the longest underground basilica in the world) and a Benedictine abbey. The project was commissioned by the regime of Francisco Franco with the official intention of commemorating those who died in the Spanish Civil War.

Beyond its historical origins, the cross represents for millions of Christians the central symbol of their faith: sacrifice, redemption, and hope. As Christian tradition teaches, the cross symbolizes Christ’s victory over death and sin.

A symbol between faith and history

Throughout the centuries, the cross has transcended the religious to become a key element of Europe’s cultural identity.

The documentary emphasizes this dimension: the Cuelgamuros cross cannot be understood solely from the political context in which it was built, but also as a symbol that connects with the universal Christian tradition.

The controversy: memory, politics and “resignification”

This monument is also one of the most controversial in Spain today for several reasons. Historians point out that the complex was conceived as a symbol of victory for the Francoist side and that its construction was linked to the use of political prisoners’ labor. This interpretation has led different governments to promote processes of “reinterpretation.”

In March 2025, Cardinal José Cobo, Archbishop of Madrid, signed an agreement with the government (represented by Minister Félix Bolaños) that, according to its defenders, sought to “save what is essential.” However, this pact has generated strong controversy. Critics, such as the Christian Lawyers Foundation (which filed an appeal with the National Court), argue that the cardinal lacked the authority to sign it, since it concerns a Pontifical Basilica whose sacred nature can only be modified with the express intervention of the Holy See.

The agreement drastically reduces the worship space to the altar and a few adjacent pews, leaving the rest of the basilica (nave, dome, and entrances) available for a process of political and ideological reinterpretation. This has raised doubts about whether the sacredness of the temple is truly being preserved.

Recent evidence: the people’s response

Far from being a “stagnant” place, this Good Friday and Holy Week of 2026, the Valley was filled with families who participated in the Stations of the Cross and services, overflowing the basilica. These events demonstrate the genuine devotion of the faithful. As the Infovaticana column points out, “the thirst of the Spanish faithful appears in springs like the Valley of the Fallen, and their thirst for truth cannot be quenched with stagnant water.”
Many parishioners regularly ask Cardinal Cobo about this issue during parish visits, expressing their concern for maintaining a church free from desecration.

An attempt to erase history?
For those who defend the cross, the issue is not merely political. It is about defending cultural and spiritual heritage. Modifying or removing this monument would mean:
• Erasing part of Spain’s history
• Breaking with a fundamental symbol of Christianity
• Setting a dangerous precedent in heritage management

The documentary addresses these concerns and poses a key question: Can a society move forward if it eliminates symbols that are part of its history, even those that generate debate?

A documentary born from the people
One of the most outstanding aspects of this project is its popular origin: financed by anonymous citizens, without large production companies or institutional interests.

Watch and share the documentary.

{YouTube CC-BY 4.0}

History, Memory and Heritage

Beyond ideological positions, this documentary—and the debate sparked by the Cobo-Government agreement—invites us to reflect on the relationship between history, memory, and heritage. Sharing it is not just about disseminating a video: it’s about participating in a debate that affects identity, culture, and the freedom to interpret the past.

Ultimately, the question that remains open is this: Is defending a monument defending an ideology… or preserving history and quenching the spiritual thirst of a people?

gatewayhispanic

SPAIN: Prolific Serial Killer Transitions While Serving 127-Year Sentence, Is Now Being Held In A Women’s Unit

One of Spain’s most prolific serial killers is now being held in a women’s correctional unit after beginning to identify as transgender while behind bars. Joan Vila Dilmé, also known as the Olot nursing home killer, is reportedly now going by the name “Aida.”

Vila, 60, was sentenced to 127 years in prison in 2013 for the murders of 11 elderly residents at the care home he worked at.

Dubbed “the angel of death” by Spanish media, Vila was arrested following the death of an 85-year-old resident at the La Caritat nursing home in the northeastern Catalan town of Olot. Medical staff determined that the woman had died after ingesting a corrosive substance, prompting authorities to classify the case as suspicious.

Police soon identified Vila, a caregiver at the facility, as a person of interest after establishing that he had been present at the time of the woman’s death. During questioning, he confessed to the killing, admitting that he had forced her to drink a corrosive substance.

Although Vila initially confessed to just three murders, a subsequent investigation revealed a far more extensive pattern of abuse. Authorities ultimately linked him to at least 11 deaths at the nursing home—nine women and two men. The victims, all of whom were between 80 and 90 years of age, were identified as:

  • Rosa Barbures Pujol
  • Francisca Matilde Fiol
  • Teresa Puig Boixadera
  • Isidra García Aseijas
  • Carme Vilanova Viñolas
  • Lluís Salleras Claret
  • Joan Canal Julià
  • Montserrat Canalias Muntada
  • Sabina Masllorens i Sala
  • Montserrat Guillamet Bartolich
  • Paquita Gironès i Quintana

The murders were carried out between August of 2009 and October of 2010.

Investigators determined that Vila had evaded detection for an extended period by initially employing methods that were difficult to trace. In early cases, he administered cocktails of barbiturates and other drugs mixed with water, or delivered high doses of insulin intravenously to diabetic patients. These methods often led to the deaths being mistakenly classified as natural or medical.

By September of 2010, colleagues began noticing a marked shift in Vila behavior. He reportedly became increasingly aggressive and expressed frustration with caring for elderly residents, stating that he wanted to leave his job. Following one of his later killings, he allegedly compelled a co-worker to remain in the victim’s room and watch over the body.

The final series of murders occurred within a five-day span between October 12 and 17, 2010. During this period, Vila killed Sabina Masllorens i Sala, Montserrat Guillamet Bartolich and Paquita Gironès i Quintana. In these cases, he abandoned earlier methods and instead forced victims to ingest bleach or injected corrosive substances directly into their mouths.

These substances, including sodium hypochlorite, caused severe internal injuries, burning the esophagus, mucous membranes and lungs, and resulting in extreme pain.

His last victim, Paquita Gironès i Quintana, was a widow suffering from episodes of dementia. She had been living at La Caritat for several years and had developed a hostile relationship with Vila. In the weeks leading up to her death, she reportedly attempted to alert staff and family members to alleged abuse, claiming he had slapped her. Her complaints, however, were ignored.

Investigators reviewing CCTV footage later determined that Vila had moved Gironès i Quintana in a wheelchair to a ward without video surveillance. She was subsequently found with injuries to her face and breasts. On the evening of October 17, Vila, who admitted he had been drinking wine while on duty, checked on her after hearing her cough. Observing that she was disoriented and struggling to breathe, he retrieved a syringe, filled it with laundry detergent, and forced it into her throat. Despite being transported to the emergency room, she died from her injuries.

Vila on the day he murdered Paquita Gironès I Quintana.

Vila was ultimately convicted and sentenced to 127 years in prison. However, under Spanish law, the effective maximum time served is capped at 40 years, meaning he could be eligible for release in 2053 if he remains alive.

Serving his sentence at Puig de les Basses prison in Figueres since his arrest in 2010, the killer has now adopted a new female name, with competing outlets claiming he is going by either “Aida” or “Aura.” 

During their report, the mainstream Spanish paper referred to Vila in the feminine, and attempted to minimize any allegations that this was done in order to gain any special treatment, arguing “her transition does not entail any benefits related to her sentence.”

They further note that Vila had allegedly said he felt like “a woman trapped in a man’s body” back during the initial investigation and trial.

As of now, he has yet to undergo any surgical alterations, but reportedly has plans to do so. His “gender-affirming” cosmetic surgeries will be paid for by Spain’s public healthcare system.

reduxx

Italian bishop backs imam’s presentation of Islam inside Catholic parish church

An imam delivered a presentation of the Islamic faith inside a Catholic parish church in Brindisi, Italy, with the participation of the local bishop.

On April 15, the parish of San Lorenzo in Brindisi, southern Italy, hosted an event titled “Do You Know Islam? Let us explore together the pillars, the meaning of life, and the celebrations of the Islamic faith,” in which Imam Khaled Bouchelaghem of the local Islamic community spoke from within the parish premises, with the presence of Archbishop Giovanni Intini of the Archdiocese of Brindisi-Ostuni, who delivered the concluding remarks. The initiative has been actively promoted by the diocesan office for ecumenism and interreligious dialogue with the stated aim of fostering mutual understanding.

Italian journalist Andrea Zambrano reported this news in the outlet La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana.

According to the diocesan communication, the initiative is guided by the principle: “If you truly know the other, you truly love them.” The title itself, framed as a question, indicates that the meeting is intended to introduce or deepen knowledge of Islamic beliefs among participants. Zambrano described the event as an “Islamic catechism.”

The stated objective of the event aligns with broader interreligious dialogue efforts, emphasizing knowledge as a basis for peaceful coexistence. The slogan associated with the initiative – attributed to Marco Impagliazzo of the Community of Sant’Egidio – has been used in similar contexts to promote engagement between different religious traditions.

The imam Bouchelaghem had previously taken part in other initiatives involving Catholic settings in Brindisi. Indeed, this event follows a previous initiative held in 2025 in another parish in Brindisi, San Carlo, where members of the local Muslim community organized an iftar meal marking the end of Ramadan. That gathering, also open to both Muslims and non-Muslims, took place within church premises and was presented as an occasion of encounter and hospitality.

Zambrano also points out that, ironically, the event was hosted in a parish dedicated to St. Lawrence of Brindisi (not to be confused with the early Christian martyr of the same name), a Capuchin friar, canonized in 1881 and proclaimed Doctor of the Church by Pope John XXIII in 1959. Historical records indicate that in 1601 he served as a chaplain to Catholic forces during military campaigns in Central Europe, offering spiritual assistance to troops engaged in conflict with the Ottoman Muslim army.

lifesitenews

SAVE BRITAIN: Ozzy Osbourne’s Widow Sharon Confirms Attendance at Tommy Robinson’s ‘Unite the Kingdom’ March

Sharon Osbourne, widow of rocker Ozzy Osbourne (The Osbournes / YouTube screen shot)

Sharon is a no-nonsense conservative.

The widow and manager of late rock icon Ozzy Osbourne, Sharon, is very different from the usual entertainment lib, and she has never hidden her conservative-leaning views.

She has criticized Hollywood celebrities for pushing liberal politics, defending the value of entertainment over leftist lectures.

She has many times defended Donald Trump as a person based on past interactions. In the UK, where she was born, she and her family have aligned with Conservative causes.

So, today, Sharon Osbourne has confirmed attendance to a patriotic march organized by rightwing commentator Tommy Robinson.

Daily Mail reported:

“Robinson has been drumming up support for the march in social media posts and earlier this week shared an Instagram video on the Gauci Reports account galvanizing followers to mark May 16 as the date ‘Britain rises and reunites’.

‘It’s the date the world hears our roar, and that we have had enough of migration and mass immigration and the oppression from a tyrannical government,’ he said. Robinson said he wanted to ‘bring London to a standstill’ adding, ‘they have tried to silence us for decades, but we will be silenced no more’.”

Osbourne commented on the post: ‘See you at the march’.”

thegatewaypundit

Italy: Former pro-migrant NGO president prepares to marry Libyan people smuggler convicted of killing 49 people

After being pardoned, the Libyan Alaa Faraj, sentenced to 30 years in prison for multiple manslaughter and facilitation of illegal immigration, marries Alessandra Sciurba, former president of the NGO Mediterranea.

A convicted smuggler and former university student, 31-year-old Alaa Faraj, is set to marry Alessandra Sciurba, the former president of a pro-migrant NGO that focused on rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean Sea, according to Italian media.

Faraj, a Libyan national, has served 10 years in Palermo’s Ucciardone prison following his conviction for multiple manslaughter and aiding and abetting illegal immigration. Authorities identified him as one of the smugglers responsible for a tragic August 2015 shipwreck that claimed 49 lives.

Despite his conviction, Faraj has “always maintained his innocence.” In a significant legal development last December, Italian President Sergio Mattarella granted Faraj a partial pardon, resulting in a “sentence reduction of 11 years and 4 months.” While he currently has nine years remaining on his term, further reductions could see his detention end even sooner.

The relationship began within the prison walls during an educational laboratory conducted by Sciurba, a human rights professor and prominent activist who used to lead the NGO Mediterranea Saving Humans. She subsequently became the “voice of his fight for the truth,” according to Italian news outlet Imola Oggi.

Their collaboration led to the publication of the book “Because I was a Boy” (Perché ero ragazzo), published by Sellerio in September of last year, which Sciurba compiled from the letters Faraj sent to her from prison.

The book has gained critical acclaim, and Faraj is currently listed among the five finalists for the “22nd edition of the Tiziano Terzani International Literary Prize.”

The wedding is scheduled for June and is expected to be a notable interfaith event. According to the Italian outlet, “The Imam and the Archbishop of Palermo will celebrate the wedding in the church of San Gaetano in Brancaccio Corrado Lorefice.“

Before his arrest, Faraj was a 20-year-old engineering student in Benghazi. He reportedly fled the Libyan civil war to “pursue his dream of playing football in Europe“ before being intercepted and charged as a smuggler upon his arrival in Italy.

In addition, seven members of the NGO Mediterranea Saving Humans, including Luca Casarini, are on trial for the crime of facilitation of illegal immigration, including profiting from it.

rmx