Allah's Willing Executioners

by Joseph Ford Cotto 

A young woman sits in a comfortable London flat or a sleek New York apartment, scrolling her feed and convinced the world is rigged against her.

She holds a university degree, earns a solid paycheck, and enjoys better workplace opportunities than her male peers at the same age. Yet she feels profoundly unhappy, distrusts men, loathes her country, and views motherhood as optional at best.

This is not isolated frustration. It is a clear pattern repeating across Britain and America. The data expose a growing electoral force whose real motivations threaten the long-term survival of first-world nations.

Merlin Strategy, for the left-leaning New Statesman, polled 2,000 British adults aged 18 to 30. The results overturn the usual story.

The widening gender gap among the young comes far more from women moving sharply left than from men turning right. Among men under 30, 72 percent hold a positive view of women. Among women under 30, only 50 percent feel positive toward men, and the figure drops to 35 percent among women under 25.

Just 18 percent of women under 30 feel very positive about men, compared with 38 percent of men who feel very positive about women. More than 40 percent of young women say men do not share their understanding of consent, while only 25 percent of men say the same about women.

These attitudes shape daily choices.

Young women are twice as likely as young men to say they do not want children: 15 percent versus 8 percent. Among white women under 30 the number rises to 20 percent. One in four young women call differing political views a red flag in a partner. Sixty percent would struggle to date someone who disagrees on Israel-Palestine or on Donald Trump. Seventy-four percent say they could not stay with someone who rejects their views on social justice.

Young women also show greater reluctance than men to date across differences on immigration. Economically the divide grows sharper.

Young women give capitalism a net favorability of just +2, while communism scores +11. Young men rate capitalism at +28. On wealth redistribution, 43 percent of young women say it is unfair that some have more and wealth should be taken, versus 40 percent who say people deserve to keep what they earn. Young men split 37 percent in favor and 51 percent against.

Young women are more likely to believe the economy works against people like them. Yet among 16- to 24-year-olds, women hold more full-time jobs and earn 9 percent more on average than men, while male youth unemployment sits 6.3 percentage points higher.

The pessimism cuts deepest.

Young women report lower happiness, ambition, excitement, and fulfillment than young men. They are 21 points less optimistic than men about earning more than their parents and 19 points less optimistic about buying the home they want. Only 53 percent of Gen Z women say they are proud to call themselves British, compared with 68 percent of Gen Z men. Forty-three percent of young women call Britain a racist country, versus 29 percent of young men.

Class and education make the pattern unmistakable.

Affluent, higher-educated women prove the most left-wing and most pessimistic. They back communism, feminism, environmentalism, socialism, slavery reparations, and the view that the U.K. is racist or sexist. Only 41 percent feel proud to be British, against 57 percent of working-class women.

White-collar women feel less valued by society, hold more negative views of capitalism and men, and insist the system is stacked against them. Working-class women feel happier, more ambitious, more fulfilled, and more certain that hard work leads to success.

American data mirror the same trend.

Among Americans aged 18 to 29, 40 percent of young women identify as liberal compared with roughly 25 percent of young men. In 2023, 56 percent of young women aged 18 to 29 identified as Democrats or leaned Democratic, versus 38 percent of young men.

The human cost is clear.

In the 2024 American Family Survey conducted by YouGov for the Deseret News, only 12 percent of liberal women aged 18 to 40 said they were completely satisfied with their lives, compared with 37 percent of conservative women. Liberal women were two to three times more likely to say they were not satisfied.

A 2020 Pew Research Center survey found that 56 percent of white liberal women aged 18 to 29 reported a mental health diagnosis, roughly double the rate for conservative women the same age. Columbia University researchers found that, from 2005 to 2018, depressive symptoms rose most sharply among female liberal adolescents. 

The 2022 Cooperative Election Study revealed conservatives outnumbered liberals among those reporting excellent mental health, while liberals dominated poor mental health reports. Conservative women scored higher on happiness. The same 2024 American Family Survey found liberal women nearly three times as likely as conservative women to feel lonely several times a week.

At root these women are not pursuing genuine political altruism for the working class or the nation.

Their ideology functions as sophisticated armor for extreme self-absorption. It excuses personal unhappiness. It shields them from accountability for delayed or rejected motherhood, unrealistic dating standards, and refusal to compromise with ordinary men. It reframes their discontent as proof of systemic oppression rather than the predictable result of their own choices and worldview.

They push redistribution, reparations, DEI mandates, and state protection not mainly to help others but to build a low-risk emotional shelter where career validation and grievance come first, buffered from real market consequences or family trade-offs. They demand constant affirmation that patriarchy, racism, or capitalism explains their alienation, not personal agency or backfired decisions.

In practice this means aggressive government to silence dissent, subsidize their preferences, and dismantle structures that demand resilience, family formation, or national loyalty. Today’s yuppie women are the most miserable because their ideology rewards endless scanning for injustice and external blame while punishing grounded realism.

As this demographic gains real power — young UK women flooding toward the Greens, young US women solidly Democratic and left — their demands lock in stagnation.

Heavy taxation and regulation choke growth. Identity politics and censorship erode merit and free speech. Softer policing risks lives while anti-patriotic sentiment rips the social fabric. Family breakdown and gender alienation accelerate as men disengage.

The outcome is slower GDP growth, governmental dysfunction, declining innovation, and ripe opportunities for pragmatic competitors such as East Asia that still reward competence and realism.

These young leftist women represent a massive threat to first-world nationhood. Their ideology is not an altruistic project for society. It is a self-destructive coping mechanism that hollows out the high-trust, high-growth foundations which foster success.

When it gains control it produces demographic suicide, cultural pessimism, and economic malaise. The data leave no room for doubt. A political plague is spreading, and the nations that continue to indulge it will pay dearly in lost prosperity, fractured families, and diminished standing in the world.

The warning signs flash brightly. Ignoring them will not spare the consequences.

Far too many young women in Britain and America do not seek a better society. They demand a world that shields their unhappiness and calls it justice. The nations that surrender to them will not survive.

americanthinker

On April 19, a physical assault took place
during a Regional Express journey from Düsseldorf Central Station to
Dortmund Central Station. At around 06:20,a 32-year-old man insulted a 24-year-old, also making racist remarks. The suspect then struck the Sudanese man several times in the face with a mobile phone.

Security staff became aware of the incident in the passenger tunnel at Dortmund Central Station and detained those involved at the scene. Federal Police officers were called in and took over further police measures.

As it was not possible to establish their identities on the spot,
all those involved were taken to the police station.
The man who had been struck complained of severe headaches and
bruising to the face. The ambulance crew who had been called to the scene
provided medical care for the man from Bochum. A breath test revealed a blood alcohol level of approximately 2 per mille in the Moroccan man. After being informed of his rights, the 32-year-old made no comment regarding the allegations.

Once the police had completed their procedures, the officers ordered the homeless man to leave the area.

The Federal Police launched a preliminary investigation and secured the video footage.

Presseportal

Liberalism is not simply a social philosophy centred on personal liberty, the consent of the governed, equality before the law, and the protection of private property, though it is often presented as little more than commitment to these tenets. Purportedly, liberalism advocates for freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, emphasising individual autonomy and limits to governmental power. 

But in fact, under a liberal regime, we observe the incremental disappearance of such things. People find themselves restricted, increasingly poor, with vast wealth concentrated among a tiny elite. They are subjected to policies for which they never voted, with the law used as a weapon to punish dissent. And they find themselves struggling to acquire property, vulnerable to ever more governmental dependence and intrusion, and thought-policed.

I believe that liberalism’s inescapable tendency to realise the opposite of what its claims entail is due to liberalism’s grounding in an anthropological assumption which is often unspoken, for speaking it would immediately reveal its falsity. 

Liberalism contains within itself a subterranean and largely unexamined hubris: basically, liberalism is deemed by liberals to be the natural and inevitable worldview of human beings once they are fully emancipated from everything that encages them. It is assumed that if the imposition of liberalism is successful in its endeavour to emancipate the members of society—from their history, cultural attachments, unchosen obligations and duties, customs and mores, and everything else that might otherwise hinder the establishment of a fully liberal society—then those people will become their authentic selves. They will be unhampered by the baggage that hitherto prevented them from becoming their authentic selves, and they will consequently discover that all authentic, emancipated selves are naturally liberals. 

Liberalism thus contains a circular logic: liberalism emancipates; the emancipated will unavoidably be liberals; those emancipated liberals will advance liberalism. And so it goes on and on.

One of the most famous liberals of my own country of England, John Stuart Mill, wrote the following:

Where, not the person’s own character, but the traditions or customs of other people are the rule of conduct, there is wanting one of the principal ingredients of human happiness, and quite the chief ingredient of individual and social progress.

So you see, according to Mill, the person’s own character—that is, the supposed pre-social ‘authentic self’—must be emancipated from tradition, and tradition’s stranglehold on social conduct, if we are going to secure human happiness and progress. The great challenge that liberalism has found itself contending with in our own age, however, is that its internal circular logic has been revealed to be faulty in the concrete. 

When, for example, Muslims come to Europe from Syria, or Pakistan, or North Africa, or any other Muslim country, and are provided with the social, moral, and economic conditions to become supposedly emancipated, we find that, very often, such Muslims do not become liberals but fanatics and extremists. Consequently, we have the so-called ‘diaspora radicalisation’ phenomenon, which is the object of growing sociological study, analysing the rise of jihadism throughout the Western world.

What is especially interesting is that when liberals try to understand why Muslims residing in the West are becoming jihadis rather than liberals themselves, they routinely blame not the Islamic texts, nor the imams and preachers, nor the attitudes of the Muslim community, nor anything else connected with Islam. Rather, they blame indigenous European populations. 

In my country, it is thus the beer-drinking, St George-waving patriot who is blamed as the reason for ongoing failures of Muslim integration in the West, and consequently he is denounced as ‘far-right’—a term whose abuse and misuse has rendered it more or less meaningless. Last week, for example, the UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer condemned Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy as “far-right” because he had the audacity to query the growing phenomenon of public prayer demonstrations by Muslim populations across Britain, suggesting that these demonstrations intimated an appetite for domination. 

The liberal will tell you that Muslims are becoming jihadis not because jihad is integral to Islam, but because Muslims were prevented from integrating. They found themselves in a society in which people were still attached to their national inheritance, their traditions, culture, history, customs and so forth, which were broadly perceived by Muslims to be exclusionary. And that is, of course, the only logical analysis available to someone who has adopted as an a priori prejudice the notion that liberalism is the natural condition of the emancipated individual.

What has this social challenge to do with the future of Christian families in Europe and beyond? My interest is not principally in the West’s Muslim populations, but in the example that they provide to illustrate a structural problem within liberalism: Liberalism’s underlying assumption is that all people, irrespective of background or religious conviction, will become liberals in a liberal society. If, in a liberal society, it is observed that everyone is not becoming liberal, it must be because the society was never made liberal enough. Either way, within the liberal paradigm, there can be no other solution to any challenge other than that of more liberalism.

This means that a liberal regime must, sooner or later, address whatever persists in any given society that continues to undermine liberalism’s endeavour to re-create that society as a fully liberal society. Thus, a liberal regime, to preserve itself, cannot avoid morphing into an illiberal regime, and in its call for individuality and diversity, it cannot avoid demanding ever more uniformity. A liberal regime must consequently seek out and extinguish any native traditions, unchosen pieties, pre-political attachments, and so forth that might hinder its emancipatory mission. 

And where are such traditions, unchosen pieties, pre-political attachments inculcated? Primarily in the family. Hence, within the liberal paradigm, with all its peculiar legends about the pre-social authentic self, the realisation of progress, and the historiography of ongoing emancipation, it is inevitable and unavoidable that the crosshairs will fall on the family.

A liberal regime will accordingly ever more seek to weaken the marriage bond by making it easy to dissolve marriages; it will redefine marriage; it will identify children as possessions of the state; it will regulate home education and uniformalise curricula; it will seek to free procreation from intercourse altogether by means of new technologies. In short, it will deny the existence of nature as foundational to reality.

This is not some error of individualism merely going too far within a liberal regime that has failed to check it with other aspects of the liberal tradition, such as, for example, responsible citizenship and the private-public distinction. No. This corrosion of the family is inherent to the interior logic of liberalism. No one, it is assumed, can be fully emancipated until the family is weakened to the level of a rescindable contract, over which the state is arbiter.

Unfortunately, it is very common that defenders of the family believe that they can achieve their objectives by first accepting the terms of liberalism’s rights-based discourse. Both individual scholars and the Christian Church have increasingly adopted the terminology of human rights in seeking to mitigate the corrosion of the family. Taking note of the interior logic of liberalism calls such an approach into question and highlights why the liberal rights-based attempts to defend the family have invariably failed.

We should recall that the contemporary liberal conception of a ‘right’ is not the same as the Christian or classical conception of a ‘right’ (or ‘ius’). Rights were first understood to be things in the world, objects on which one could make a just claim. Then they were later developed to mean moral powers to fulfil obligations or duties. Then they were later developed to include negative pronouncements to protect oneself against harm or inordinate interference. Finally, in response to the worst excesses of wartime utilitarianism, they came to mean the moral powers that are seemingly infinite in number to fulfil the one obligation by which we’re all supposedly bound, namely to become our authentic selves.

Within a discourse framed by such a fiction of ongoing emancipation, of which the liberal conception of rights is just one part of the repertoire, a natural outflow of nature like marriage and family simply cannot survive. Seeking to defend the family within the discourse of modern rights is like trying to save Gondor by using the Ring.

We cannot allow the debate of the future to be framed by a narrative of competing rights which strive for primacy within a liberal order which is a priori accepted as the only possible political order. Such a debate’s terms are already set by the fictions of the prevailing regime that’s intrinsically hostile to marriage and family. The argument for the family has thus lost the debate before it’s even begun. 

Really, the debate must be about whether we still believe in nature—which is ultimately everything from which our liberal, progressive paradigm wants to free us—above all that part of nature called human nature. In the end, with nature, the family stands or falls.

europeanconservative

An influential Labour Party peer has joined the chorus of calls demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer over the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as U.S. ambassador despite his ties to deceased paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

This week, the long-running scandal enveloping Downing Street over the appointment of veteran Labour spin doctor Lord Mandelson to the top diplomatic posting in Washington rocketed back into the headlines after it emerged that he was selected despite having failed his security services vetting process.

Top civil servant Sir Oliver ‘Olly’ Robbins was sacked on Thursday in an apparent attempt to divert attention away from Prime Minister Starmer, who maintained that he was unaware that Mandelson had failed the vetting process before having decided to make the appointment, itself a tacit admission that the PM was not in control of his own government.

The claim has been treated with widespread scepticism in Westminster and has sparked a further round of calls for Starmer to resign.

On Sunday, Lord Glasman, the founder of the Blue Labour movement, which calls for the left-wing party to move back to its working-class roots, said that the refusal of Prime Minister Starmer to take accountability for the Mandelson appointment has fundamentally undermined any remaining trust in his leadership.

“If you can’t own your mistakes, you can’t move. All he needed to say was ‘we made an error’. But he’s completely stuck in saying he hasn’t done anything wrong, so this can’t go away. It’s as straightforward as that, really,” he told The Telegraph.

“He cannot conceivably continue as a credible Prime Minister any longer. And that’s all because he cannot say ‘I made a mistake, I’m sorry’,” Lord Glasman added.

Epstein Scandal: UK Ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson Failed Security Vetting But Was Appointed by Starmer Anyway https://t.co/UlStXO2fR4

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) April 17, 2026

Speaking separately to The Times of London, Lord Glasman noted that he had advised Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, against the appointment of Mandelson over his longstanding ties to Jeffrey Epstein, even after his first conviction for child prostitution.

It later emerged that Mandelson had passed on confidential government financial information to the New York money man in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, sparking an ongoing police investigation. 

“This is the most bizarre story I’ve ever been involved with. I warned them that Mandelson was going to be a disaster. Now the prime minister’s inability to own the mistake further undermines any credibility he has with the British people,” Glasman said.

However, it has been speculated that potential challengers to Starmer from within the Labour Party, such as his former deputy Angela Rayner, are waiting in the wings until after the upcoming local elections on May 7th, so as to hang the likely losses on Starmer’s head.

The main beneficiary of the scandal-ridden government has so far been Nigel Farage and his Reform UK party, which has maintained a lead in the polls since early last year. 

In comments reported by the Daily Mail over the weekend, Farage said that he is expecting a “political earthquake” next month, from which his party will seek to launch their bid to destroy the two-party establishment in Westminster and take the reins of power at the next general election.

“What we’re reaching into here is something that certainly Boris Johnson couldn’t, even in 2019. If I’m right, this is of a whole different magnitude. It is an electoral earthquake for two reasons,” Farage said. “One, Labour is dying in the heartlands. And two, the Conservative Party is ceasing to be a national party.”

breitbart

A teenage shooter who perpetrated one of the deadliest school attacks in Turkish history has been identified as a non-binary male student who used “she/her/it” pronouns. İsa Aras Mersinli, who carried out the attack on April 15, reportedly preferred to be referred to as “Konata” – a name belonging to his favorite female character from a Japanese animated series.

The attack took place on Wednesday at Ayser Çalık Secondary School in the Onikişubat district of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. According to Turkish media reports, the incident began at around 1:30 p.m. local time, when an armed student entered the school grounds carrying multiple firearms.

Authorities identified the attacker as 14-year-old İsa Aras Mersinli, an eighth-grade student at the school. Reports indicate that he brought at least five guns and several loaded magazines stolen from his father, a local police chief inspector.

The shooting reportedly began in the schoolyard before Mersinli moved inside the building, where he entered classrooms and fired indiscriminately. Witnesses described scenes of panic as students and staff attempted to flee or hide, with some taking shelter in bathrooms and others escaping through windows.

The attack resulted in the deaths of at least nine people, eight students and one teacher. The teacher, Ayla Kara, died while attempting to shield students in her mathematics class. More than a dozen others were injured, some of whom remain in critical condition.

Mersinli was subdued at the school by staff and parents, but was stabbed during the altercation and died of blood loss at the scene.

A guidance counselor at the school was among those who subdued Mersinli. Speaking to local media, Ejder İ. noted that Mersinli was a problem student with a long history of incidents at the school.

“We were in constant contact with his family. He had a screen addiction. He did not want to come to school. Even when he came, he wanted to leave,” Ejder said.

According to statements given by his family, Mersinli had been receiving psychological support in the months leading up to the attack, with specialists reportedly noting that he struggled with difficulties in social adaptation. However, he had recently stopped attending sessions. 

Following the shooting, a manifesto purported to have been written by Mersinli began to circulate on social media, along with screenshots from Discord servers he had been active in.

Mersinli was a fan of Japanese animated series Lucky Star, and had adopted the name “Konata” in reference to one of the cartoon’s major characters, Konata Izumi. A picture of Izumi appears on the first page of the manifesto, and Mersinli used pictures of Izumi on his Discord and Steam profiles.

“Konbanwa,” Mersinli begins the document, using a Japanese greeting, “I am Konata and Konata is me. I love her very very much. As of writing this, it is April 11th, 2026. By the time you are reading this, I am either in planning to do something big, have done something big or about to do something big.”

The manifesto continues by describing Mersinli’s desire to be “noticed” and that he feels he is “better than everyone around me intelligence wise.”

The document was leaked by an individual claiming to be Mersinli’s girlfriend. She censored the manifesto, which apparently contained some egregious racial and sexual slurs, and also added a footnote to the manifesto reading that Mersinli “was non-binary” and used “she/they/it” pronouns.

“She wanted to be remembered as ‘Konata’ because of a character from an anime she liked,” the footnote reads.

Mersinli’s girlfriend, who is located in Argentina, also made a TikTok video offering more details on their long-distance relationship, which she also described as “polyamorous.”

The girl admits that Mersinli had threatened repeatedly to commit the shooting in Discord conversations, but that she had written it off as a joke.

“It was a joke, at the start. We never took it seriously. Konata always said, ‘oh, I’m going to do a school shooting, ha ha ha.’ And we would say, ‘guys, smile, we will be in a documentary soon,’” the girl says, using feminine pronouns to refer to Mersinli. “She was both my and Victor’s girlfriend; we were in a polyamorous relationship. When we found out what had happened, we all cried. Neither Victor nor I wanted Aras to do this. We told her many times, ‘Please don’t do it, it’s not worth it.’ Our other friends said the same.”

The “third” partner in the polyamorous love triangle, referred to as Victor, also made a post on Mersinli lamenting his actions and death.

“RIP Konata, why would you do such a thing. I loved you I still do. I can’t even take off the cosplay you wanted me to do. Everything I eat tastes horrible. Why did you kill them, I hoped that you were kidding, you weren’t. I love you my sweet girl. I’m sorry the society failed you.”

Additional videos from Mersinli’s Discord account have since begun to circulate on Turkish social media. In one video shared with his Discord friends, he is seen modeling in a skirt and off-shoulder blouse. in other photos Mersinli distributed, he was seen posing while wearing components from his father’s police uniform.

Bilgisayarındaki notlarında kendisinden HE/SHE olarak bahseden Kahramanmaraş katili İsa Aras Mersinli'nin Trans eğilimleri olduğu ve canlı yayında etek giydiği kadın kıyafetleri giydiği görüntüler ortaya çıktı. pic.twitter.com/TrtbdPYjpJ

— CZR HBR (@czr_hbr) April 16, 2026

Mersinli appears to have been at least somewhat inspired by other school shooters, and Reduxx can confirm he had been using a photo of Isla Vista killer Elliot Rodger on his WhatsApp profile.

Mersinli’s girlfriend appears to have shared his fascination with school shooters, and had reposted romanticized, anime-style drawings of the Columbine shooters on her now-deleted TikTok profile.

While Mersinli’s motive is currently unknown, he appears to have harbored a tremendous resentment towards his father. In a leaked WhatsApp conversation Mersinli had with a friend, he accused his father of having sexually abused him when he was younger. In other messages sent on Discord, Mersinli alleged his father had been physically abusive towards him. None of these claims have been addressed or substantiated as of the publication of this article.

In recent years, the United States and Canada have experienced an escalating pattern of mass shooters who claim to identify as transgender. In February, Jesse “Jess” Strang fatally shot 10 people at a Tumbler Ridge secondary school prior to taking his own life. Just days later, in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, Robert Dorgan, who also went by the name Roberta Esposito, shot four family members and a family friend at a youth hockey game, killing two and injuring three others before killing himself.

reduxx

An RAF cadet has been removed from his course after stating that Islam is the greatest threat to UK security during a training exercise.

The trainee officer at RAF Cranwell now faces investigation for his comments.

The incident occurred shortly before Easter when the cadet, participating in a 24-week Modular Initial Officers Training programme at the Lincolnshire academy, was taking part in presentations alongside approximately 50 fellow students.

During a question-and-answer session focused on threats to national security, the young trainee offered his assessment, prompting his immediate suspension from the course that prepares the next generation of RAF officers.

Retired rear admiral Chris Parry has sharply criticised the RAF’s handling of the situation, demanding the cadet be allowed to return to training.

“If I’d asked that question and got that answer I would have also asked the cadet to expand on his thinking and got some critical thinking going rather than suspend him,” he said.

Admiral Parry argued the distinction between Islam and Islamic extremism should have been explored through discussion rather than disciplinary action.

“Clearly Islamic extremism is the issue and not Islam, but how are young people expected to develop critical thinking around these complex issues if they are shut down in this way?” he added.

The retired rear admiral further suggested the response would likely have differed had the cadet identified the far-right as the primary threat.

“If this cadet had answered ‘the far-right’ I doubt he would have been suspended,” Admiral Parry stated.

“We know that Islam is not a threat, rather it is extremist elements, and this appears to have been a missed opportunity to discuss that for fear of causing offence.”

He characterised the incident as symptomatic of a training system failing to permit young personnel to articulate and refine their views.

An RAF spokesman said: “We are aware of an alleged incident of inappropriate behaviour involving a cadet at RAF Cranwell.

“An investigation is ongoing, we are unable to comment further.”

Islamist extremists have carried out some of the deadliest terrorist attacks on British soil in recent decades.

The 7/7 London Underground bombings in 2005 killed 52 people.

As well as the 2017 Manchester Arena attack following an Ariana Grande concert, which killed 22 people.

The government has acknowledged an ongoing threat from state-backed terrorism.

They have responded to more than 20 Iranian-backed plots since 2022 and describing the danger posed by the Islamic Republic as “persistent and unacceptable”.

Defence Secretary John Healey has indicated that Britain’s terror threat level is being reassessed following the outbreak of conflict involving Iran.

gbnews

by Texas Hughes 

“Donald Trump’s most unhinged 48 hours as president in 11 bizarre moments.” That’s a verbatim headline from the Mirror, a British “newspaper” (some might call it a “rag”). That’s not the only “unhinged” moment, according to the popular British outlet. Another headline reads, “Donald Trump’s unhinged 24 hours as he ramps up Pope beef and plots ugly monument to himself.” And yet another states, “Donald Trump ‘thinks fizzy drinks kill cancer’ as his ‘unhinged’ diet revealed.”

All of those headlines were published in the last week alone. Looking at Trump’s accomplishments, it’s easy to see that British leftists, like their American counterparts, make up any kind of crap they can think of that says what their demented acolytes want to believe is true.

But there’s something even more ironic about the Mirror’s headlines. They come from a nation controlled by an ultra-woke Labor party that sucks up to Muslims and perverts at every opportunity. Prime Minister Starmer is like having a shrieking hag from The View for President—only without those gals’ “moral” courage.

For the record, Britain’s per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is less than the per capita GDP of every state in the USA. Whereas California, with about the same population as Britain, has a per capita GDP that would make it the fourth-largest per capita GDP among the world’s nations.

Yes, the 4th-largest world per capita GDP compared to the 51st-largest per capita GDP if Britain were a state. Americans need no other argument than this as proof that our capitalistic freedoms are superior. Democrats rioting against this also tells sane people that Democrats are a social suicide death cult.

This utterly crushes the idea that socialism, liberal Wokeism, and cuddly Muslim immigrants are the successful wave of a bright future for humanity.

No wonder that the one operational naval destroyer Britain broke down when the Brits sent it to defend their base in Cyprus.

No wonder Britain could not even deploy 600 troops for operations outside of Britain.

If only we could deport Democrat rioters to Britain, where they could “enjoy” all of the societal “benefits” they want to force upon Americans.

americanthinker

A large proportion of investigations into insults against religions are taking place in Berlin on grounds of alleged Islamophobia. This is shown by statistics obtained by Apollo News. The number of such investigations has risen sharply.
The majority of investigations under the so-called blasphemy clause in Berlin in recent years have been conducted on the grounds of alleged Islamophobia. This was revealed by an enquiry from Apollo News to the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the capital. Last year, as many as half of the proceedings were conducted on the grounds of alleged Islamophobia. This means the proportion has risen from 20 per cent to 50 per cent since 2023.

Section 166 of the Criminal Code prohibits the “insulting of creeds, religious communities and ideological associations”. If such an insult is likely to disturb the public peace, it may result in a fine or a prison sentence of up to three years.

Between 2023 and 2025, there were a total of 76 investigations under this section, according to a list obtained by Apollo News. The public prosecutor’s office distinguishes between ‘anti-Christian’, ‘anti-Semitic’, ‘anti-Islamic’ and ‘xenophobic’ motives. In addition, there are further cases that are not assigned to a specific religion in the statistics, but rather to the category “Other”.

Of all 76 cases, 31 involved proceedings on “Islamophobic” grounds, accounting for 40 per cent. This compares with eight proceedings for anti-Semitism and five investigations on “anti-Christian” grounds.

In addition, there were seven cases over a three-year period involving an alleged “xenophobic” motive. According to the public prosecutor’s office, “xenophobic” is defined as “that part of hate crime which is committed on the basis of the victim’s perceived or actual nationality, ethnicity, skin colour or religious affiliation”.

The rise in the overall figures is primarily attributable to investigations into suspected Islamophobia, although there were slight increases in other categories as well. In 2023, there were a total of 15 cases under Section 166 of the Criminal Code; in 2024, there were 29 cases; and in 2025, there were 32. This can be attributed to the fact that investigations into Islamophobia rose from three cases in 2023 to 12 cases in 2024.

Of the 32 investigations in 2025, 16 were conducted on grounds of Islamophobia. Half of the proceedings were therefore initiated because someone had said something about Islam which, from the authorities’ perspective, could be considered an insult likely to disturb the public peace. The public prosecutor’s office did not state how many of the investigations led to fines or prison sentences.

apollo-news

After locals reported a Nigerian man for killing a cat and trying to cook it in the middle of the day, police intervened in the town of Sarzana. A photo of the man has been published by Italian news media, with the blurred remains of the cat still visible in front of a children’s playground.

Responding to the incident, Councilor for Security in the province of La Spezia, Stefano Torri, called the act “atrocious that cannot and has no place in a civilized society.”

The man was stopped by Italian police after multiple calls from witnesses in the Crociata neighborhood, in a park dedicated to the Italian partisan commander Flavio “Walter” Bertone, according to Italian news outletIl Messaggero. It remains unclear if the man was arrested.

Torri stated on social media: “We are working hard to return Crociata Park to its citizens, finalizing the tender process for a management that will finally bring positive community, order, light, and legality to this area.”

The right-wing League Party also commented on social media. Italian MP Michela Vittoria Brambilla stated on Instagram: “The terrible incident in Sarzana, where a man killed a cat in a public park with the intention of cooking it, is unworthy of a civilized country. Italy is not a no-man’s land: barbarism cannot and must not have any place here. Anyone who tramples on the life of an animal tramples on the values ​​of our community.”

She further noted that “Italy has put an end to the horrors against animals: it did so by passing the Brambilla law, which recognizes animals as sentient beings and increases penalties for those who commit crimes against them. Those who think they can violate our country’s rules should know that the time for impunity is over.”

In Nigeria, cat meat is popular, however, it is less common than the consumption of dog meat, which is considered a speciality in the country and nicknamed “404.”. In 2020, Change.org featured a petition to end Nigeria’s “horrific” dog and cat meat trade.

However, cat meat is even more popular in neighboring countries of Ghana and Liberia.

This incident of animal abuse in Sarzana comes shortly after the rape of a local cat Rosi in Rome which sparked national headlines. The cat was left with traumatic injuries that nearly killed it. Despite the hope expressed in the video below, her condition has since deteriorated and she is being fed through a tube while remaining in intensive care. The unknown perpetrator has been labeled “the demon Tor Tre Teste” and is actively being sought by police, with many locals fearing that the suspect may be responsible for a number of other cats that have disappeared in the area.

In addition, last year, an African migrant from Mali was charged for slaughtering a beloved local dog Merlin in front of a pharmacy and then carrying the dog’s body home in Naro, allegedly to eat, according to Italian newspaper La Stampa. The week before, police say he also tortured another dog by pouring boiling oil over the animal; however, the courts released the man, only for him to almost immediately reoffend.

Animal rights activists also commented on that case, including Enrico Rizzi, who noted that this migrant had already been arrested for pouring boiling oil on a dog just the week before.

“Seven days ago, this non-EU man had already burned a poor stray dog with boiling oil and even attacked the Italian police who intervened,” said Rizzi, an animal rights activist. “The man had been arrested and immediately released by the judiciary. Back on the street, he took another stray and slaughtered it. He must be sent home.”

The Hope shelter in Agrigento shared a photo of Merlin as well, writing on Facebook: “He had been living free and looked after with love from the neighborhood for years. As citizens and as animal lovers, we will not remain silent: We will formalize a regular complaint to the competent authorities, asking for justice for Merlin and safety for all.”

Yesterday, Remix News reported on the case of an Afghan migrant in France who was arrested for raping multiple sheep and goats.

rmx

Journalist and GB News presenter Patrick Christys joins Emma Trimble on this week’s #NCFTrimble to discuss his experiences undercover in migrant camps and what he has learned about the organised migrant invasion into Britain.