In the final push before voters head to the polls this week to choose who will staff their local council governments, Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party unveiled perhaps its most tantalising policy prescription for illegal migration: let the Greens deal with it.
Echoing schemes in America in which Republican governors such as Texas’ Gregg Abbot or Florida’s Ron DeSantis bused illegals to elite Democrat strongholds like Martha’s Vineyard, Reform UK shadow Home Secretary Zia Yusuf said that if given power, the party will place all migrant detention centres in constituencies that voted for the pro-mass migration Green Party.
Yusuf noted that in order for the government to carry out large-scale deportations, it will need to detain tens of thousands of migrants at the same time and therefore will be in need of detention centres to hold the illegals.
However, rather than spreading out such detention centres evenly throughout the country, the Reform immigration spokesman said that the party would ensure that the burden of illegal migration disproportionately impacts those who support it.
“A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP. Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council,” Yusuf said on Sunday.
He added that a Reform government would “prioritise Green-controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green-controlled councils to locate the detention centres… This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.”
The Greens, who have seemingly abandoned focus on climate matters in favour of courting its multicultural base on issues like opposition to Israel, is dominated by far-left ideology on immigration, with its members previously voting to grant illegals amnesty and provide them with taxpayer-funded housing.
A 2023 policy document stated that the party believed in “world without borders” and that illegal immigration should not be considered a “criminal offence under any circumstances.”
For Reform to be focusing on the Greens in the waning days of the campaign perhaps demonstrates the scale to which British politics has transformed since the last time voters went to the polls for the 2024 general election, in which both Reform and the Greens only managed to pick up a handful of seats in the parliament.
Less than two years on, the Green party, under the leadership of upstart radical Zach Polanski have surged in the polls and now stands neck and neck with governing Labour as the top left-wing party in the country in the polls, having its support base bolstered by peeling off the youth and Muslim voting blocs away from Labour.
Meanwhile, Nigel Farage’s Reform Party has blown past the Conservatives to become the most popular party in the country, as trust continues to fade in the two Westminster establishment parties following years of economic mismanagement and a bipartisan failure to properly police Britain’s borders.
According to predictions from an election expert and Tory Peer, Lord Hayward, Labour could be on pace to lose nearly three out of four of its local council seats that are up for election on Thursday, or around 1,900 out of 2,500 seats.
Conversely, Hayward predicted that the Greens would gain around 500 council seats, the Conservatives would lose around 600, and Reform would gain 1,550 councillors. However, the election expert did caution that the landscape is novel and therefore may be ripe for surprises.
“We’re in a truly unprecedented world where you’ve got both Reform and Greens as major disruptors,” he toldThe Times last week. “We’ve never had five-party politics before. Normally, the opposition gains off the government. On this occasion, all parties are fighting each other for all the seats.”
For his part, Reform leader Nigel Farage said that he would be very pleased if Lord Hayward’s predictions came true, while saying that he expected his party to perform “stunningly well” on Thursday. Mr Farage has predicted that the local elections will force Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to finally resign from his post.
Farage Predicts His Reform Party Will Perform ‘Stunningly Well’ at This Week’s Local Electionshttps://t.co/6I5XK3nT19
If there is one thing to be said about the Germans, they are persistent. Any nation that would invade a neighbor with a far greater population, larger industrial base, and more natural resources, all of which were mobilized for war, as it did with Russia in WWII, and persist on that path until the enemy was at the Brandenburg Gate, would also be the last to give up on an energy policy that is a complete failure. Chalk it up to the conceit and over-preening of its people. For the Germans, it is a repeat of Stalingrad. Commit the whole economy to achieving the prize of Energiewende, and then watch it collapse in ruin like the 6th Army on the banks of the Volga River.
Germany’s fate is not foreordained. There is still time left for the Germans to start up their nuclear plants, fire up their coal-burning plants, and stop the hemorrhaging of industry to countries with cheaper energy. However, the German political class is like Hitler in his last days in the bunker. As the Russian troops were encircling Berlin, he busied himself with ordering non-existent troops to launch counter-offenses. Likewise, German politicians are installing an ever-increasing number of solar panels in the hope that its experiment in transitioning the energy sector will prove to be the right decision. They are taking the economic miracle that their fathers achieved in the aftermath of WWII and throwing it away on a fantasy that an economy can function without firm dispatchable thermal power.
I would like some German central planner to explain to me why installing 120 GW of solar capacity is a good thing at a latitude of 52° N. One would not grow pineapples at that latitude. Likewise, one should not attempt to power a modern economy with solar. The capacity factor, a measure of actual output / maximum possible output, for a solar plant is 8%. Compare that with a thermal plant that might range between 60–70%. Solar is an expensive asset from which little utility is derived.
Germany has an additional problem with solar power. Half of its solar power capacity is on private rooftops (behind-the-meter) and floods the grid at inauspicious times. During periods of high solar radiation combined with low weekend or holiday demand, the grid gets flooded with “must-take” renewable energy, making it difficult to balance the power grid. Unlike dispatchable thermal power plants, which can be throttled more easily, the fluctuating nature of solar requires complex interventions to prevent grid overloads. Moreover, solar panel owners are guaranteed a fixed feed-in tariff regardless of market prices, and the gap between market price and the guaranteed remuneration must be covered by subsidies.
It is a mess that keeps growing, becoming more menacing. It also is ratcheting up the price of electricity, scaring away industry and plunging the average German into energy poverty. German electricity generation cost for its mixed system of solar, wind, and thermal running in tandem is $136/MWh, compared to U.S. electricity generation for a thermal only which is $38/MWh—over three times greater. If you were the owner of a German chemical company, the cost differential would make relocation to the U.S. attractive. My calculations are here.
Moreover, pressure on Germany to change its energy policy is emerging from another quarter. Trump’s order for withdrawal of 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany was not only an expression of his displeasure with Germany’s stance in the war with Iran, but a signal to German leadership that support for European security amongst the U.S. populace is waning. Germany will have to choose between rearmament and staying the course with its Energiewende, a classic guns or butter tradeoff. The question remaining is whether Germany will allow itself to be encircled and destroyed as it was at Stalingrad, or will it break out of its current mindset and forge a new path forward?
Cambridge University has faced criticism for declining to suspend students who allegedly made death threats against a fellow undergraduate following his visit to Israel.
Bradley Smart, a 21-year-old third-year student at Homerton College, participated in a trip organised by the Pinsker Centre think tank, which brought Oxbridge student leaders to meet both Israelis and Palestinians to gain insight into the Gaza conflict.
Upon his return to college, Mr Smart, who is not Jewish, claims identifiable students posted threatening messages in a group chat, including phrases such as “I’m going to kill him” and “he needs to die”.
After reporting the threats through official harassment procedures, the college reportedly advised him to contact welfare services or consider relocating to different accommodation.
The group chat messages also contained slurs, degrading language, and antisemitic material, drawing comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, according to Mr Smart.
Fearing for his personal safety, he vacated his Homerton accommodation approximately one month after the incidents began.
Mr Smart told The Telegraph: “As a Cambridge student, I expected my university to be a place where opinions could be refined through dialogue.
“The reality, however, was that this trip was enough to trigger a campaign of cancellation, including explicit death threats and being banned from a college club.”
When he approached police about the matter, Mr Smart claims officers informed him it constituted an “academic matter” and declined to pursue an investigation.
Lord Walney, who previously served as the Government’s counter-extremism tsar, condemned the institution’s handling of the situation.
He said: “It is entirely unacceptable that students at one of our leading universities would threaten to kill one of their peers for visiting Israel.
“The college’s response is wholly inadequate, and sets a dangerous precedent that intimidation and threats of political violence will be tolerated. Cambridge must do better.”
Ben Freeman, executive director of the Pinsker Centre, warned: “Jewish students and their allies are in fear for their lives.
“After recent attacks, this fear is all the more justified. Threats of violence cannot be normalised. We cannot allow intimidation to shut down dialogue.”
Gabrielle Apfel, president of the Cambridge Israel Society, described the university as having become “a lion’s den with regard to Israel and Zionism” over the past two and a half years.
Ms Apfel added that the Cambridge Israel Society has hosted progressive speakers, including former Labour MPs, yet still considers it necessary to keep event locations confidential.
She said: “Jewish and Israeli students feel like they have to keep their connections to Israel and their identities to themselves. No student should feel unable to be themselves because of their background or identity.”
The allegations emerge amid escalating anti-Israel sentiment across Britain’s elite universities.
An Oxford student faced charges last year for inciting racial hatred after leading chants calling to “put the Zios in the ground”.
Violent incidents targeting British Jews have also risen sharply in recent months, with two Jewish men stabbed in Golders Green, north London, last week.
During this time of the year, we in Israel commemorate Holocaust Remembrance Day and then exactly one week later, the nation commemorates Memorial Day. On Memorial Day, we in Israel mourn our fallen soldiers and victims of terrorism, halting everything as the sirens blast (cars stop, pedestrians stop, the nation literally comes to a standstill). These past weeks and months, given that Israel’s sirens were prompts to rush to bomb shelters, one can only imagine the anxiety and accompanying stress, should one of those sirens have coincided with a memorial siren.
The common denominator between these two pivotal historical events namely the Holocaust and the Iranian attack on the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) and Israeli civilian population centers, is Germany’s intentional involvement and compliance.
Nazi Germany’s responsibility for implementing the Holocaust is an undisputable historical fact. Yet few associate Iran’s current nuclear and military capabilities with the very same nation, namely Germany, a nation responsible for annihilating 6 million Jews during the Holocaust. Germany played a key role in the early development of Iran’s nuclear program decades ago that jump-started the Iranian nuclear capability by providing German nuclear technology, training, specialized components, and machinery.
Key details regarding German involvement included providing Iran with specialized equipment such as high-strength aluminum, vacuum pumps, numerical controlled machine tools and frequency Converters: critical frequency converters for thousands of Iran’s centrifugal machines.
Historically, Germany was a primary technological partner for Iran, particularly in infrastructure and energy: This transfer of technology of actual components by Germany has over the years enabled Iran to advance and transform its nuclear weapons industry to weapons grade enrichment.
Despite international sanctions, approximately 77 formal agreements were initiated over the years between German and Iranian higher education institutions. These involved student exchanges and joint research in fields like physics and IT. A major treaty was signed between the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) and the West German Ministry for Research and Technology. This paved the way for the construction of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, originally designed and partially built by the German firm Kraftwerk Union (Siemens), a core installation for Iran’s enrichment program.
Iran has relied on dual-use German nuclear technology to enrich and produce weapon-grade uranium enabling a nuclear threshold capacity. Iranian leaders being confident that their advanced nuclear weapons industry would deter any external attempt to prevent their nuclear ambitions, interpreted the West’s apathy over the years to this emerging threat that a nuclear Iran would pose for the world. This indifference has enabled Iran to spread her tentacles of Islamist terror through her proxy Islamist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
Today, the United States and additional Western nations have come to the realization that Iran poses an existential threat beyond the borders of the Middle East, with Israel being just the first step within its overall plan.
Iran’s existing constitution, formed in 1979 and subsequently amended in 1989, outlines a vision that is fully incompatible with Western principles and has guided and empowered the Islamic leaders of Iran throughout its forty-seven-year existence. It also gives meaning to what has often been mistaken for mere hyperbolic cheerleading: “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” While America was built on notions of liberty, individual freedoms and limited government control, the Islamic Republic of Iran is based upon a global totalitarian vision.
Essentially, it seeks a one-world Islamic government derived from Koranic principles and Sharia law. It set out to help all similar revolutionary efforts across the world, justifying its support for its proxies such as Hamas and other Palestinian Arab terror factions in the Gaza Strip, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Islamic terror cells throughout Europe. In addition, it was hoped that this Islamist vision of world domination would be realized by the end of the 20th century, which certainly explained Iran’s unquenchable appetite for nuclear weapons as the optimum, most accelerated pathway toward overtaking all other forms of rule.
Germany has also provided the Islamic Republic of Iran, whether intentionally or not, an additional motivational path to use their nuclear ambitions to achieve their goal of world domination. The Aryan myth closely associated with German Nazi society during the 1920s and 30s, is one of the fundamental pillars of Iranian Islamist nationalism. Iran’s Islamic leaders have used their sense of self-acclaimed Aryan superiority to demand parity with Europe and dislocate Iran from the perceived backwardness of the Islamic Sunni world.
Born in early nineteenth-century Europe, the Aryan myth was a product of linguistics, of racial anthropology – a pseudo-science that today is totally discredited. When the Nazis came to power in Germany in January 1933, they began to legislate on the basis of their racist worldview. A central goal of Nazi policy was exclusion and, ultimately, the annihilation of Jews. It often claimed to empirically demonstrate the inherent superiority of Europeans over the non-European subjected ‘races’. It later became a fundamental component of Nazi ideology.
Believing in the Aryan kinship of Iranians, German Orientalists and cultural emissaries introduced the Aryan myth into Iran in the first half of the twentieth century. The convenient intellectual device produced from this curious importation is well known: Iranians are part of the Aryan race and thwarted from their glory by religious and cultural miscagenation with Semites (in this case the Jews, and Sunni Arabs).
The Nazis were careful to use ‘Aryan’ themes. Erwin Ettel, a German ambassador to Iran from 1939 to 1941, emphasized the use of such themes in his “general guidelines for propaganda to Iran” while he also insisted that “Germany’s battle against World Judaism” should also be directed “against the Jews in Iran, who want to force the Aryan Iranian people under their yoke”.
In 1951, Sumka, the Iranian Nation-Socialist Party, was explicitly modeled on the Nazi Party and, alongside other far-right groups such as the Pan-Iranian Party, it sponsored attacks on local Jews and leftists in Iran while boasting about the ‘Aryan’ race that the majority of Iranians supposedly belonged to. It is remarkable that although both terms ‘Aryan’ and ‘race’ have fallen into disuse in the West, they are a fundamental component of modern Iranian political thinking among Iranian leaders.
Since 1952, when diplomatic relations were established between the Federal Republic of Germany and Iranian Islamic Republic, diplomatic relations were close and resulted in numerous technological, cultural, and industrial bi-lateral agreements. However, the volume of trade has decreased significantly in recent years as a result of the sanctions against Iran, primarily from the United States’ withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and the sanctions unilaterally imposed by the United States.
Nevertheless, there is still considerable interest in bilateral cultural and academic exchange between the two countries’ civil societies. One can only conclude that had Germany not been forced to end their close bi-lateral relations with Iran due to American sanctions, not only Israel but the whole of Western societies would be under the existential threat posed by Iran on the world.
Knife crimes by migrants are plaguing all of Europe.
Spain is in the process of legalizing half a million illegal migrants, while the violence by Muslim extremists continues to increase.
A knifeman who reportedly shouted ‘Allahu Akhbar’ stabbed a teenage girl to death in front of horrified bystanders in Barcelona, in what authorities believe was a random street killing.
This same man also reportedly stabbed a man before being detained by police.
🇪🇸 Muslim migrant screams “Allahu Akbar” and stabs a young girl to death with 7 knife wounds in broad daylight in Spain.
“A photo of the alleged attacker brandishing the weapon he used on his victim emerged overnight as police confirmed they had made an arrest.
The fatal stabbing took place in broad daylight yesterday morning in Esplugues de Llobregat – an area in the southwest of the city that sits around two miles west of the Camp Nou stadium, home to FC Barcelona – at around 11 am.”
🚨🇪🇺 Ursula says Europe is SAFE, best place to raise kids
🇪🇸 Meanwhile Barcelona: Man stabbed multiple times in broad daylight at Plaça de Catalunya, fighting for his life
“Police are still trying to establish whether the attacker knew his victim, whose age and nationality have not yet been revealed.
They have confirmed there was no romantic relationship between the pair that they were aware of, and well-placed sources said they were focusing on the theory that it was a random stabbing.”
AI-Generated Image by Grok – Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting
Streeting expected to challenge Starmer in the next few days.
For the last 21 months, we’ve watched as Sir Keir Starmer goes from scandal to crisis and back – but now his own Labour party seems poised to put an end to his failing premiership.
The endgame is expected to come as reports reveal that his own Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, has gained the backing of enough Labour MPs to launch a leadership challenge.
🚨NEW: Wes Streeting, close friend of Peter Mandelson, has the backing of enough Labour MPs to launch a leadership challenge against Keir Starmer within days.
“The Health Secretary has recruited more than 81 MPs – the minimum required to trigger a challenge – and is now contemplating his next move.
Sir Keir Starmer was alerted to Mr. Streeting’s intentions when a Downing Street staff member was accidentally texted details of his plans, including the ‘five pillars’ of his campaign and his ‘PFG’, meaning plan for government.”
The look on Starmer’s face says it all. Downing Street is about to get very uncomfortable for Wes Streeting. The internal battle begins! pic.twitter.com/H5Ax8hK04j
Streeting’s allies want him to move as soon as next Friday, the day after the expectedly disastrous results for the party in the local elections.
“An early move would catch out Mr Streeting’s leadership rivals, who do not yet have campaigns ready to go, most notably Andy Burnham, the Manchester Mayor, who is ineligible to stand because he is not an MP. Angela Rayner is said to be undecided about whether to stand, and is part of a three-way conversation with Mr. Burnham and Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, about being part of a soft-Left triumvirate seizing power.
However, Mr. Streeting is wary of the risks of being first out of the blocks. History shows that politicians who topple leaders rarely succeed them, and there are strong arguments for letting someone else show their hand first or waiting to see whether Sir Keir quits of his own volition.”
Some of the male inmates who have been held at the Washington Correctional Center for Women. From Left: Nonnie Lotusflower, Christopher Williams, Brooke-Lynne Sonia, and Jolene Charisma Starr (now released).
A conservative non-profit organization has launched a lawsuit against the Washington Department of Corrections (WADOC) on behalf of a female inmate who says she was brutally assaulted by a dangerous transgender pedophile being held at the state’s women’s facility. The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) is challenging the WADOC gender identity policy that allows men to request a transfer to the female estate, arguing that the policy has “led to multiple instances of violence and sexual abuse against the female inmates.”
The AFPI suit claims that the WADOC is violating female inmates’ Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments rights, which protects prisoners from sex discrimination and from “cruel and unusual punishment.”
Prison officials are accused of continuing to place trans-identified male inmates in the Washington Correctional Center for Women (WCCW) while “simultaneously ignoring, disregarding, and dismissing complaints of sexual harassment, assault, intimidation, and violence that have ensued as a foreseeable result of their failure to segregate incarcerated people on the basis of sex.”
“Under this policy, male convicts who self-identify as women are permitted to request a transfer to the prison meant exclusively for females, where they are permitted to share cells, bedrooms, bathrooms, and showers with an all-female population,” states the AFPI complaint.
“Although Washington maintains multiple all-male correctional facilities, it no longer maintains a single female-only prison: only females are deprived of the right to serve their sentences in a single-sex sex-segregated facility.”
🚨NEW LAWSUIT ALERT: In Bob Ferguson’s Washington state, the safety, dignity, and privacy of female inmates come AFTER the feelings of males who ID as trans.
It doesn't matter if the male was convicted of r*pe, murder, or sexually assaulting a child–they get to choose "gender…
In particular, the lawsuit focuses on a series of physical and sexual assaults alleged to have been committed by two trans-identifying male inmates, both of whom are serving sentences for the violent sexual abuse of underage girls: Christopher Williams, a registered sex offender, and “Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower,” born Nathan Goninan, who is currently serving a 10-year sentence for the murder of a teen girl.
Current inmate Faith Booher-Smith spoke with Reduxx last September describing how she was struck repeatedly in the head by convicted pedophile Williams, who has remained in the women’s prison despite having been accused of sexually assaulting a female inmate just last year.
On August 7, 2025, Booher-Smith recounted how Williams, who stands 6’4″, began punching her in the face in an apparent retaliation against her for calling him a “rapist.” Booher-Smith, in contrast, is 5’4″.
“I was kicked and punched continuously. At this point, I saw who was doing this – Christopher Williams. I was immediately in fear for my life, trying to block while protecting my face and head, kicking out with my feet,” she says.
Despite there being a corrections officer nearby, no prison staff intervened to stop the brutal assault.
🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨
A female inmate has come forward to reveal that she was brutally assaulted by a transgender sex offender being housed at a women's prison in Washington.
Christopher Williams was moved to the prison after beginning to identify as a "woman."https://t.co/IwosQjxGb2
The current lawsuit notes that a high-ranking prison official had initially opposed Williams’ transfer to WCCW, stating that Eric Jackson, Superintendent of Monroe Correctional Complex (the male prison Williams was requesting transfer out of) recommended against transferring him to the prison for females “due to the fact that Williams was convicted of inflicting life threatening injuries ‘to a female victim.’”
Despite sustaining serious injuries, including facial bruising, a laceration in her mouth, and swelling to her jaw and eye, her complaint about Williams was “mocked, ignored, and even retaliated against by prison officials,” according to the complaint.
The AFPI suit also cites two previous lawsuits filed by former inmate Mozzy Clark, a former inmate who, in her legal claims, stated that Williams had sexually assaulted her over a period of months after she was made to share a cell with him.
“Williams masturbated in front of her, groped her while she slept, and repeatedly threatened her with rape. During these episodes, prison staff ignored concerns for her safety and even discouraged her from filing official complaints, cautioning her about potential retaliation,” according to the AFPI filing.
The incident occurred in April of 2022 after he was moved into her cell.
The woman, who Reduxx referred to by the pseudonym Mary, had been prescribed sleeping medication to help with her growing anxiety at sharing a cell with the sexual predator.
Williams had been sexually harassing her with increasing aggressiveness. she noticed that Williams began to sit next to her bed at night after she took her medication. One night, she was woken up to the sound of an officer pounding on their cell door, demanding to know why Williams was sitting next to her bed. Mary speculates that the officer likely saw Williams touching her during her rounds.
“I’m not sure how many times he touched me because of my [meds]. But one day I came back to my cell from a work shift and he had two strap-on dildos and asked me to use them on him. I refused. That night, I was woken up to him touching me.”
Mary says she was voicing her concerns to staff, but was “pretty much being ignored.”
Christopher Williams’ first conviction occurred in 2005 for the sexual assault of a 9-year-old girl. Williams, who was 16 years old at the time, rubbed the vaginal area of the child and groped her buttocks. He was initially charged with child molestation in the first degree but was ultimately convicted of assault in the third degree with sexual motivation, to which he pleaded guilty.
Williams was ultimately handed a suspended 52-week sentence in juvenile detention, and was required to register as a sex offender. He would go on to again be convicted of assault in 2008, and then would rack up multiple arrests and convictions for failing to register as a sex offender as required over the coming years.
Another trans-identified male transfer named in the AFPI suit is “Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower,” or Nathan Goninan, who has been accused of violently assaulting another female inmate, after which he was placed in restrictive housing at WCCW.
🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨
A violent trans-identified male currently housed in a women's prison in Washington has been charged with assaulting a female correctional officer.
Nonnie Lotusflower is serving a 10-year sentence for the murder of a teen girl.https://t.co/spyBqZNBCx
Last year it emerged that Goninan, or Lotusflower, was charged with intimidating a public servant and malicious mischief in the first degree after he threatened and assaulted a female correctional officer.
Court records obtained by Reduxx describe how Goninan began threatening a correctional officer lieutenant on the morning of September 24, 2024. The officer, along with a prison psychologist, had been scheduled to visit Lotusflower in order to conduct an administrative hearing to address his “unauthorized actions” in the facility. The lieutenant was acting as an Administrative Hearings officer when Goninan began shouting, “Get out, I will fucking hurt you, get the fuck out of my face, I swear I will hurt you.”
The convicted killer then made a sudden forward motion as if attempting to lunge towards the lieutenant. Both the officer and psychologist were able to leave the small room and called for assistance. As the two were outside the room, Goninan was able to partially break free from his restraints and began shouting “Boo!” at them in an attempt to frighten them.
Staff responded to the call for backup and the use of force became necessary, and Goninan was sedated. Several other violent outbursts made by Goninan were detailed in court records, including an incident of vandalism wherein he broke a glass window in the facility’s library, and another incident in which he shouted, “I am stomping down any cop and slitting their throats. I am murdering you all. I don’t care.”
The AFPI claim highlights how senior WDOC official Deborah Wofford, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Women’s Division, acknowledged that Goninan was an “unmitigated threat to the safety of other incarcerated individuals,” had made serious threats of bodily harm toward staff, and exhibited “overtly threatening and aggressive behavior” that was “not typical” of individuals incarcerated at WCCW.
Goninan was convicted on second-degree manslaughter charges for the brutal murder of 17 year-old Jessica Franklin. He targeted Franklin just hours after being released from prison in 2007, and upon his release, strangled her to death. Her body was found beneath an underpass in Bellingham, Washington, and a forensic examination revealed signs she had been sexually assaulted.
"I was terrified. I didn't know what to do."
Violent trans-identified males are being housed at the women's prison in Washington and attacking female inmates.
Reduxx spoke to one victim who was brutally assaulted by a transgender sex offender while staff failed to intervene. pic.twitter.com/MKfkJxOWe5
Attorneys for AFPI argue that the WADOC has been aware of the ongoing sexual and physical violence at WCCW as a result of gender identity policies, and that officials are responsible for the ongoing violence against women occurring there. “Despite these repeated acts of violence against female inmates, WDOC continues to house male inmates at WCCW out of a confoundingly religious adherence to the Transgender Inmate Policy,” says AFPI. “The result is an environment of threats, violence, and chaos in a State-maintained penitentiary established to house and rehabilitate female prisoners.”
“Nothing has changed in the wake of the violent assault on Booher-Smith. No additional security measures have been implemented at WCCW to segregate male inmates from female inmates, boost security, or otherwise ensure that violent attacks like the one perpetrated on Booher-Smith do not recur. Nor has a single, meaningful change been made to WDOC’s Transgender Inmate Policy.”
“A women’s prison is supposed to protect women,” said Leigh Ann O’Neill, chief legal affairs officer at AFPI. “Washington’s policy turned that basic duty on its head. When the state knowingly forces women to live with men in intimate correctional settings—even after assaults, abuse allegations, and repeated warnings—it is violating the women’s constitutional rights.”
The women’s prison in Washington has a number of trans-identified males currently being housed there, including serial killers, pedophiles, and rapists.
Among them is Donna Perry, a serial killer who murdered 3 women in 1990. Part of Perry’s motivation was a jealousy over women’s reproductive systems, and he once confessed to murdering up to 9 women in total.
In 2023, an internal source at the prison informed Reduxx that there were almost one dozen male inmates at the women’s facility, and of them, the majority had been convicted of crimes against women or children.
Samuel Hayek, president of the Jewish National Fund, shocked England by saying: “Jews have no future in the United Kingdom,” Not only Jews, but Western civilizatiion
The photo features a child holding a sign with the flag of Palestine and the words ‘Save Our Children!’ Twitter
by Giulio Meotti
When the canary stops singing in the mine, the miners know the air is already poisoned.
March 23: four ambulances of the Jewish service set on fire.
April 15: fire at the Finchley Reform Synagogue (north London).
April 17: fire in Hendon at the headquarters of a Jewish charity (Jewish Futures).
April 18: Molotov cocktail attack against the Kenton United Synagogue in Harrow (north-west London).
April 29: stabbing in Golders Green.
And this is only in London over the past month.
It is a creeping, methodical siege that transforms once cosmopolitan and liberal neighborhoods into hostile territories and pushes an ancient, respectful, and integrated community to question its future on British soil.
3,700 attacks against British Jews in a single year.
Chilling report on “no-go zones for Jews in England” in the weekly Le Point:
“Signs of solidarity with Palestine, in the form of stickers displayed on shop windows, dot Bradford. A former textile hub, the city-nicknamed ‘Bradistan’ due to its large Pakistani community-illustrates the flaws of British multiculturalism.
“Sarah Sackman, Labour candidate in the upcoming general election for the Finchley and Golders Green constituency, which hosts a large Jewish community, stated: ‘I have friends who are afraid to wear a kippah on public transport. On university campuses, attacks against Jewish associations have been shocking.’
“From the windows of the café opposite the Jewish Community Centre on Finchley Road, a quiet North London neighborhood-red brick houses, families returning from school, sports fields-you can see security guards searching visitors.”
Meanwhile, Jewish children are attacked at train stations in London. And so London has become “a no-go zone for Jews,” denounced the former counter-extremism czar Robin Simcox. And Jews are leaving London.
On Oxford Street, in central London, young Jews attacked.
A convoy of cars in London threatens Jews with megaphones, shouting “rape your daughters.”
Jewish women and children run over by a scooter in London.
Without even mentioning the massacre at the Manchester synagogue.
“I am more afraid for my daughter wearing a Star of David on the London Underground than for my son in the Israeli army in Gaza,” said Lord Wolfson in the House of Lords.
Samuel Hayek, president of the Jewish National Fund, shocked England: “Jews have no future in the United Kingdom,” said Hayek, who has lived in the UK for 40 years and is one of the country’s most prominent philanthropists.
The Muslim population in England could triple over the next twenty years.
Dominic Green writes in the Wall Street Journal: “We are one major terrorist attack away from the end of Jewish life in England.”
Those who can, emigrate. Those who stay, retreat into increasingly fortified communities, paying with their daily freedom the price of their identity.
According to Winston Smith, the protagonist of “1984″, doublethink and doublespeak are used to mask what is actually being said in an oppressive regime.
So when our “good people”-the Progressives, the Anti-fascists, the professional Partisans and the Woke activists-repeat that the problem is two swastikas, three skinheads or Orbán attacking Soros, they are telling us something they do not want to admit out loud.
Landing at Tel Aviv airport, Mark Lewis, one of the most famous English lawyers, said: “Europe is finished.”
The canary has stopped singing. The silence that follows is the sound of a long history coming to an end.
Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) is going to fundamentally change the world. But will this transformation be good or disastrous for humanity? In this clip from his longer interview, Dr. Robert Eptstein, one of the world’s leading experts on Big Tech monitoring and surveillance delves into the topic of A.I. and his fears about the potential for conflict with humanity.
May 3 Constitution Day Parade in Kraków, 2025. Scotch Mist, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Every May 3, Poland celebrates more than just a historical date. It not only commemorates the Constitution of 1791—the first to be adopted in Europe and the second in the world—but also recalls a much more recent battle: that of a people striving to preserve their identity in the face of a system that sought to erase it.
Today, it may seem unthinkable, but in 1951, Poland’s oldest national holiday was banned by the communist regime and became just another workday. But the problem was not the day itself, but what it stirred up: a collective consciousness that was difficult to control. To understand why May 3 was persecuted, one must look beyond constitutional history. This date represented something the communist regime could not tolerate: national sovereignty, historical memory, and the desire for freedom. Those who dared to celebrate it risked arrest, persecution, and violence. For the regime, patriotism and Catholicism were not mere values but direct threats. A system that proclaimed the union of peoples under a collectivist model dictated from Moscow could not tolerate expressions of national identity rooted in its own history, culture, and traditions.
May 1 as a propaganda tool
May 3 also posed an uncomfortable challenge to the regime in comparison to May 1, Labor Day. Far from being a spontaneous celebration, the latter became a grand propaganda spectacle and a display of power that reinforced the social hierarchy and obedience to the leader. Portraits of leaders such as Lenin, Stalin, or Bierut—General Secretary of the Polish United Workers’ Party—dominated public spaces, constantly reminding people who held power. Under the control of the Workers’ Party and in the shadow of Moscow, the streets were filled with mandatory parades. Miners, nurses, workers: all were part of a carefully staged spectacle. Mobile platforms displayed idealized scenes of the socialist world—new infrastructure, happy workers, industrial advances—creating a fictional image of prosperity amid overwhelming darkness and scarcity.
When celebrating was an act of resistance
Despite the ban, May 3 never ceased to exist; it simply took on a new form. A significant example of this is the events in Kraków in 1946. After a Mass at St. Mary’s Basilica, thousands of young people took to the streets chanting slogans: “Down with communism”and “Bierut must go.” The regime’s response was swift: the Internal Security Corps opened fire with machine guns on the demonstrators, killing several and wounding hundreds. It was one of the harshest crackdowns of the postwar period, but far from quelling the movement, it strengthened it. In the years that followed, May 3 lived on in small acts of resistance: graffiti on walls—“Long live May 3!”—flowers laid on the graves of national heroes, and discreet gatherings.
Faith and nation: an inseparable bond
After it was banned, May 3 began to be celebrated in secret and found a way to survive through the feast of the Virgin Mary, Queen of Poland. During the communist era, this celebration took on a dual meaning: religious and patriotic. It became a form of resistance against the regime. Masses were filled with patriotic content. Hymns such as Rota (Oath) and Boże coś Polskę (O God, Who Watches Over Poland) were sung during these services, evoking the struggle for freedom and divine protection over the nation.
“We will not abandon the land from which our lineage springs! We will not let our language fall into oblivion! Polish nation, Polish people, heirs of the Piast dynasty: we will not allow the enemy to subjugate us! So help us God!”—(excerpt from Rota)
“God, who throughout the centuries has surrounded Poland with the radiance of power and glory, and has protected it with the shield of your providence against the misfortunes that threatened it; before your altars we raise our plea: deign, Lord, to restore to us a free homeland!”— (excerpt from Boże coś Polskę)
These were not mere religious hymns but genuine expressions of national identity that kept historical memory and the spirit of resistance alive during the most difficult times. The regime was fully aware of this. That is why it persecuted both priests and the faithful. However, it failed to break that deep bond between homeland and faith.
Solidarity, repression, and the path to freedom
In 1981, the emergence of the independent trade union Solidarity opened a crack in the system. For the first time in decades, May 3 was once again celebrated publicly in several cities. However, the repression did not disappear. In 1982, under martial law, the celebrations led to clashes. In Warsaw, the streets filled with demonstrators carrying white and red flags. The state responded with its full apparatus: roadblocks, tear gas, water cannons, and aerial surveillance. There were injuries and arrests. On television, the narrative was different: “attempts at destabilization.” The gap between official rhetoric and reality had never been so evident. It was not until 1990, after the fall of communism, that the Polish Parliament officially reinstated May 3 as a national holiday.
When people feel their identity is under threat, they find ways—visible or invisible—to defend it. Sometimes in the streets. Sometimes in churches. Sometimes, quite simply, in memory.
