Allah's Willing Executioners

The Islam researcher Susanne Schröter criticises the announced integration policy of the “traffic light” coalition in unequivocal terms. Instead of the principle of ” support and demand”, the new government is declaring a renunciation of demanding integrative efforts from migrants.

Schröter writes this in an article for the newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung. “The success of integration is now understood exclusively as the task of the majority society.”

The sharpest instrument of this “plan for an imposed social transformation” are anti-discrimination guidelines against “group-related misanthropy”, which are aligned with demands of lobby organisations. “Numerous Muslim NGOs and their supporters have understood how to make the most of the self-accusation of bourgeois circles who consider themselves racist simply because they are white and non-Muslim,” says the head of the Research Centre Global Islam at Frankfurt’s Goethe University.

Schröter sees the spread of an aggressive, intolerant Islam among Muslim pupils as a particularly damaging development for integration, which is, however, tabooed by the leftist zeitgeist. “This is not about religious rights or even the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religious confession, but solely about Islamist supremacy,” Schröter writes. The ones who suffer are religious minorities, especially Jewish pupils, “but also liberal Muslims who are subjected to constant religious bullying”.

For children and young people from precarious backgrounds in particular, school can be a space where they can transcend the rigid conditions of their family of origin and acquire knowledge “that is ostracised as heretical knowledge in their milieus, but is the key to successful careers in our society”. Only then would they have real opportunities to participate.

But all this only works if they can develop freely at school without having to fear the influence of mosques and parental homes in the form of Islamist guardians of public moral values.

https://rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/integrationspolitk-susanne-schroeter-wirft-ampel-einknicken-vor-islamischen-lobbygruppen-vor_aid-65275197

by Giulio Meotti

When Konstantin Eggert, former deputy editor of the Russian newspaper Izvestia and radio Kommersant, correspondent of the BBC from Moscow and columnist of the Financial Times, resigned from the famous think tank Chatham House in London for its having awarded an award to Melina Abdullah, founder of Black Lives Matter, he did it with a spectacular letter-testimony. “There is no need for a Gulag today to enforce conformity,” Eggert wrote.

An academic at Mount Royal University in Canada knows something about this. She has just been fired for criticizing Black Lives Matter, the National Post tells. Frances Widdowson, a professor in the Calgary University Department of Economics, Justice and Political Studies, confirmed she was fired in December. Widdowson said she wasn’t surprised by the move, but she was shocked “at how badly the university has deteriorated over the past year and a half.”

The professor, who has been teaching at the university since 2008, was targeted when she claimed that the Black Lives Matter movement “destroyed the university”. A petition calling for her dismissal has more than 6,000 signatures. In a long interview, Widdowson explained that today to criticize the LGBT movement and the new anti-racism means that one immediately finds oneself in a “forbidden zone” of thought.

It would be stupid and shortsighted to think that this is an isolated case or an administration of the mentally ill.

-Zac Kriegman had the ideal curriculum: a business degree, a PhD from Harvard and years of startup and consulting experience. He has spent the past six years at Thomson Reuters Corporation, the international media conglomerate that owns Reuters. In early 2020, Kriegman had assumed the title of Director of Data Science.

-As he tells the City Journal this week, Kriegman was attacked by colleagues and fired via email. He had committed an unforgivable crime: criticizing Black Lives Matter on the company’s internal communications forum. Driven by what he called a “moral obligation” to speak up, Kriegman refused to celebrate the black supremacist fiction and “diversity and inclusion” programs of his he company; on the contrary, he argued that Reuters was exhibiting political bias. Asked to “reform his thoughts”, Kriegman refused and they fired him.

-The director of a leading American academic publication, Harald Uhlig of the University of Chicago, the best-known German economist in the United States, for criticizing Black Lives Matter, likening the organization to flat-earthers because of the campaign to dissolve the departments of police, was ousted from the Journal of Political Economy.

-Leslie Neal-Boylan was fired as director of a nursing school in Massachusetts for writing that “everyone’s lives matter.”

-Cornell Law School professor William Jacobson has been censored by his university for calling Black Lives Matter “anti-American activists who want to destroy capitalism in an act of revenge.”

-Tim Gordon was fired from Garces Memorial High School, a Catholic high school in Bakersfield, California, for calling Black Lives Matter rioters “terrorists” during the looting.

-A University of California professor, Gordon Klein, was fired for refusing to allow more exam time for black students during the Black Lives Matter protests.

-A Vermont principal, says the Wall Street Journal, was fired after posting on Facebook: “I strongly believe Black Lives Matter, but just because I’m not walking around with a BLM sign shouldn’t mean I’m a racist.”

But we would be wrong twice to think that if at universities you incite for the actual killing of whites, the same result will ensue.

A psychiatrist at Yale medical school told a seminar that she dreams of “killing whites,” a professor at Rutgers University argued that “whites must be hunted” and a Cambridge researcher wrote that “the lives of whites they don’t count ”… And none of them have lost their jobs.

The Sorbonne in Paris hosted a seminar against this trend. The organizer, Pierre-André Taguieff, in Le Figaro, explains that this movement wants to “destroy Western civilization by starting to criminalize all its past and rejecting all its legacies. From the more or less playful deconstructionist pedantry this monster that is ‘wokism’,was born a conquering conformism that seems to mark the emergence of a new totalitarian spirit “.

And whoever gets in the way must be eliminated.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/320328

Le Point: Instead of talking about ” great ethnic replacement “, a topic on everyone’s lips today, you prefer to talk about ” great experience “. Aren’t these two sides of the same phenomenon, one pessimistic, the other optimistic?

Yascha Mounk: The great exchange contains three ideas: that the ethnic diversity
of our societies will come to a bad end; that it is a conscious decision by the elites to eliminate the “ethnic” people; that it can be reversed if you change your policies. While the demographic change we are experiencing is a crucial challenge, its outcome can be positive if responded to appropriately. Second, the Great Experience is not a test on our population, but rather a process that has been set in motion since the 1950s without anyone making a conscious decision to do so.Thirdly, it is unrealistic to attempt to undo history.

Is this irreversible?

Our countries are already multi-ethnic. The only way to put an end to this movement would be extremely cruel: civil war or the expulsion of our compatriots. The big picture experiment is to realise, as we did after the French Revolution, that we don’t know exactly how it should work, but that it must work. The philosopher Pierre Manent has proposed in “Situation de la France” to make a treaty with French Muslims – a departure from the republican view.

Is this a way to make the great experience a success?

No. The idea that a citizen’s social status should depend on his or her ethnic origin or religious beliefs would amount to what the French are sometimes quick to point out: a betrayal of the values of the Republic. And if you look at history, conflicts do not become milder in societies where the civic status of individuals depends on their ethnic or religious background. We have seen what this has led to in Lebanon. Not least because it makes permanent social divisions that are tied to a particular era. Instead, we should interpret our basic principles in such a way that ethnic or cultural minorities can really be part of a society – for example, that one can feel fully French without feeling that one cannot be fully Muslim at the same time. Le Point

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/12/lintellectuel-yascha-mounk-appelle-a-accepter-le-grand-remplacement-la-seule-maniere-dy-mettre-fin-serait-une-guerre-civile-ou-la-persecution-de-nos-concitoyens/

What allegedly happened to the physically disabled widow Lili F. (90) in the toilet of the emergency room of the Dresden-Friedrichstadt hospital is shocking.

According to the indictment, the Iraqi Munthar Al L. (33) forced his way into the toilet and abused her severely. Now he is standing before the Dresden Regional Court “for rape with intentional bodily harm”, according to senior public prosecutor Lorenz Haase.

Lili F., who lives in an old people’s home, came to the emergency room for an X-ray after a fall. In the waiting area she wanted to go to the toilet: “At the door someone suddenly pushed the wheelchair, put me on the toilet. At first I thought it was a nurse. But when he wordlessly rubbed his hands between my legs and groped my chest, I got scared.”

He also allegedly touched the old lady in her private parts, and she has had nightmares ever since. To protect her from having to go to court, the police recorded her statement on video.

The accused (“I drink eight beers and a bottle of ouzo every day”), who lives in Gorbitz with his wife and daughter (9) who have kidney disease, denies everything: “She’s lying! I wanted to help, just lifted her to the toilet.” The trial will continue.

https://www.bild.de/regional/dresden/dresden-aktuell/staatsanwalt-sicher-iraker-33-vergewaltigte-rollstuhl-fahrerin-90-in-klinik-78795546.bild.html###wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fm.bild.de%2F&wt_t=1642006813412

The case is currently causing a stir and sensation in France. A rich, elderly Parisian businessman from Versailles, who had taken out many life insurance policies (worth millions) for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, dies of a Covid vaccination (not disputed by the doctors or his life insurers). But now it gets worse: the insurance company does not pay out the insurance money because the deceased was acting at his own risk when he had the Corona vaccination.

The reasoning is quite clear: the insurance company refused to pay to the family because the policy explicitly excludes the use of experimental medicines and treatments (including the Corona vaccination). The family consequently sues the insurance company, but ultimately fails. The judge states:

Here is the judgment summarised mutatis mutandis:

“The court recognises the insurer’s classification of participation in the phase three experiment, the proven harmlessness of which has not been established, in view of the announced side effects, including death, as voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract and legally recognised as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defence is accepted as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly disclosed taking of a fatal risk is legally recognised as suicide, as the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”

Consequently, death after vaccination is now considered suicide by the courts (at least in France)! Insurers will now start not to pay out life insurance policies on a large scale, since taking a fatal risk due to vaccination de facto excludes them from the contract and it thus becomes void. Unimagined also are the consequences for bank loans etc. So far, nothing has been heard of this scandalous case in the French mainstream media.

The family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, posted the case on social media. (https://www.facebook.com/cab2626/)

https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/corona-hammer-lebensversicherung-steigt-nach-impftod-aus-da-freiwillige-impfung-mit-experimentellem-impfstoff-wie-selbstmord-zaehlt/

The place of worship may have become a “place of radicalisation”, according to the municipality, which refers to “statements made by the former head of the mosque”.

The prefecture recalls that a law “provides that the representative of the state in the department may order the temporary closure of places of worship where the statements made there, the ideas or theories disseminated or the activities carried out incite hatred or violence against a person or a group of persons, or tend to justify or promote such hatred or violence”.

It argues that the Al Madina Al Mounawara mosque “propagates Sharia law, supports radical Islam and thereby promotes separatist secession” and states that ” dubious relations have been established with persons belonging to the radical Islamist movement and advocating pro-jihadist views”. On social networks, the place of worship had spread “hate speech against France, its institutions and laws”, displayed “hate speech against homosexuals or transsexuals” and “explicit anti-Semitic hatred”, the authorities said.

“This decision comes after careful investigative work by the state authorities and numerous indications given directly by the municipality since 2015,” explained City Hall.

Incidentally, on CNews, Gérald Darmanin reported that he had spoken to LR mayor David Lisnard and that he “courageously” supported this decision to initiate administrative closure proceedings.

“For some time, several years even, the mayor has been sounding the alarm about what is happening there, what is being published on social networks,” the director general of services confirmed to 20 Minutes. According to Thierry Migoule, the authorities took this decision because the facility had become “a place of radicalisation” and because of “the opinions of the former head”. 20 Minutes

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/01/12/cannes-une-mosquee-proche-des-islamistes-du-ccif-visee-par-de-multiples-signalements-depuis-2015-tenait-notamment-des-propos-antisemites-et-haineux-envers-la-france/

The head of the statue of the little Jesus, which was present in the church’s nativity scene, was carefully laid down in the straw next to the rest of the body. A few days earlier, another church less than two kilometres away had also been vandalised.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/clubvaleurs/societe/six-statues-decapitee-dans-une-eglise-a-poitiers/

Germany will have to accept more migrants in order to prevent a massive shortage in its workforce and a decline in economic productivity, German Economy and Climate Protection Minister Robert Habeck has claimed.

“We now have 300,000 vacancies, and we expect the number to grow to one million or more,” said Habeck, who is also a co-chair of the radical left-wing Greens.

He added that if Germany fails to fill this gap, any subsequent downturn in the German economy would jeopardize the nation’s transformation of the energy industry.

However, these claims come at a time of growing evidence that Germany’s existing migrant population is failing to enter the job market despite the German government investing tens of billions of euros in integration. Mass migration also creates difficulties for the education system and the housing market, with Germans struggling to afford housing and rent, and subsequently restricting their options for expanding their family or founding one in the first place, which has added to the demographic squeeze facing the country. Germany already has some of the highest immigration numbers in the world, and the country has already rapidly changed in terms of demographics.

Germany, which already has one of the highest population densities among developed countries, could also face further environmental degradation with a growing population. The Green party’s demands for more new arrivals would lead to more consumption, more cars on the road, and the need for more green space to be demolished in order to build housing and infrastructure.

Nevertheless, according to Reuters, the German Economic Institute (IW) estimates that the number of workers in Germany will decrease by another 300,000 this year. The country’s aging workforce has caused a situation whereby more people are leaving the labor market than entering it. In 2030, the German labor market will have reportedly contracted by approximately 5 million people.

After several decades of low birth rates and unequal immigration, the declining number of working people is a time bomb for the German pension system, Reuters reported.

Other countries in Europe, such as Hungary, have focused on growing their own population numbers rather than import immigrants en masse.

“In all of Europe there are fewer and fewer children, and the answer of the West to this is migration,” said Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in 2018. “They want as many migrants to enter as there are missing kids, so that the numbers will add up. We Hungarians have a different way of thinking. Instead of just numbers, we want Hungarian children. Migration for us is surrender.”

Hungary’s pro-natalist and pro-family policies have produced positive results so far, with an increase in births and marriages, and a drastic reduction in divorces, which has caught the attention of countries like Japan. Meanwhile, countries like Germany, which have far more resources than Hungary, could potentially be even more successful with pro-family policies if the country made them a greater priority.

At the same time, other countries like Japan have made up for a shortfall in their aging workforce by utilizing AI and automation in order to avoid mass migration.

Last year, despite the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany, the number of people employed had risen to almost 45 million.

During the coalition negotiations, the parties in the current government agreed to make it easier for skilled workers from abroad to enter the German labor market, in addition to increasing the minimum wage to €12 per hour as an incentive to encourage more people into work.

https://rmx.news/article/german-minister-calls-for-greater-mass-immigration-to-combat-nations-ageing-labor-market/