Allah's Willing Executioners

A prominent LGBTQ activist and drag queen has been charged with the possession of child pornography. Berlin-based performer “Jurassica Parka,” whose real name is Mario Olszinski, has been charged with hoarding 131 video files containing suspected child pornography, totaling five hours and 25 minutes in length, as well as 28 images.

In July of 2025, the Berlin public prosecutor’s office confirmed that police searched Olszinski’s apartment in Schöneberg after receiving a tip from the US-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which linked the Olszinski’s IP address to suspected child-pornography access and storage.

An investigation was opened, and it revealed that Olszinski had previously been convicted by the Tiergarten District Court in October 2023 for acquiring, possessing, and distributing child pornography. Olszinski was handed a reduced sentence at the time, because, according to the judgement, he was “remorseful and confessed, the act was spontaneous, and the offense had occurred some time ago.” As a result he was charged a fine of approximately €11,000, or, a €70 daily fee over the course of 160 days.

Olszinski was not immediately charged, and attempted to initially defend himself on social media.

A prominent German drag queen has been named as the subject of an investigation into the distribution of child sexual abuse material.

Jurassica Parka, born Mario Olszinski, is a former "Queer Berlin Ambassador."https://t.co/gl9mbLisBC

— REDUXX (@reduxx) October 23, 2025

But formal charges have now been lodged against Olszinski after months of investigation, and police have made it clear that the content is independent of Olszinski’s 2023 conviction and pertain to new instances and materials.

A spokesperson for the public prosecutor’s office told German outlet WELT that Olszinski’s prior conviction could have an aggravating effect on his current case, and may result in a prison sentence.

Despite the fact that Olszinski identifies as a gay man, most German-language news outlets referred to him using feminine pronouns.

In a 2015 interview, Olszinski explained that the “the urge to wear women’s clothes has always been in me,” and described childhood memories wearing his grandmother’s clothes. In that same interview, Olszinski claimed that wearing women’s clothes was a way for him to “express” himself.

“I have for myself found a channel through which I could release energy, immediately I was hooked,” he told the interviewer.

“Jurassica Parka” is a well-known activist in Berlin’s political and cultural scene for over a decade, and even performed his own theater show in Berlin-Kreuzberg. has previously held the title of “Miss Christopher Street Day” at Berlin’s annual pride event. He has also acted as a “Queer Berlin Ambassador” for the tourism campaign by Place2Be Berlin, officially representing the LGBTIQ scene in the city.

As a result of his prominence, Olszinski has been photographed rubbing shoulders with top politicians and celebrities in Germany, and frequently gets invited to influential entertainment events. He frequently appeared as a campaign supporter for the Berlin Social Democratic Party (SPD), especially during the 2021 state parliament election.

In April 2024, the German Foreign Office (Auswärtiges Amt) and German Embassy in Tokyo invited Olszinski to the Tokyo Rainbow Pride (Tokyo CSD), where he participated in the parade and offered face painting services to children.

The total cost to taxpayers for the trip was €6,000, as confirmed by the Foreign Office in response to a NIUS inquiry. At the time, he had already been convicted in 2023 for distributing child pornography material.

On July 14, 2025, Olszinski moderated the Gemeinsambunt benefit gala at the Theater des Westens in Berlin. The event was organized with involvement from the Berlin Police, among others, and was under the patronage (Schirmherrschaft) of Berlin’s Police President Barbara Slowik.

Reduxx has learned that a prominent transgender police officer in Germany has been posting fetish content involving children on social media.

Ria Cybill Geyer has been sharing fetish photos featuring themes of little boys being forcibly "transitioned."https://t.co/mpjYqhy6SL

— REDUXX (@reduxx) November 16, 2023

This is not the first instance in which a sexual predator has had support from the Berlin Police. In 2023, Reduxx revealed that a trans-identified male working for the Berlin police force had been posting fetish content online, some of which involved themes of transitioning and sexualizing children. Ria Cybill Geyer, born Reiner Geyer, also had led LGBTQ workshops at schools.

As Geyer discussed in a debate for Klartext, he had been involved in “SCHLAU workshops,” which are held with youth to “promote the acceptance of diversity.” The programs receive funding from the Ministry for Children, Youth, Family, Equality, Flight and Integration of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia.

One of the first accounts followed by Geyer on Pinterest, Sabine Satin, shares a variety of images known as “sissy captions,” featuring photos of young women in lingerie, sometimes bound and gagged and appearing to be in pain, with sexual text displayed alongside the images.

“Become this girl. Tell me how it feels,” read one caption. Another depicted a young woman wearing a collar and a leash and says “own me, take me, use me.” Other images depicted underage boys in lingerie.

In addition to his role as a police officer, Geyer boasted several other titles connected to the government and trans activism. Like Olszinski, he was appointed as a representative for the Social Democratic party (SPD), and in that capacity, he worked with law enforcement as an “SPDqueer” officer.

reduxx

When the Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in Egypt, Islamist extremists covered the statues in Alexandria, calling them the product of “a corrupt and infidel civilization.”

When ISIS conquered the Iraqi city of Mosul, it banned statues as “idolatry” and destroyed many of them.

Today, to witness the great purge of female forms, there is no longer any need to fly to the Tehran of the ayatollahs, the Kabul of the Taliban, the Damascus of the former Al-Qaeda throat-cutters, or the Gaza of Hamas.

Just turn on our evening news, where Europe blurs classical female statues – just as they did in Rome’s Capitoline Museums during the visit of Iranian President Rouhani.

France 2′s 8 PM news, Tuesday, May 19. A statue of two lovers is blurred. In the background is the work Amour in Issy-les-Moulineaux, created by Louis Cosme Demaille, a famous 19th-century sculptor (photo).

To which theocratic prescription has the French “public service” submitted?

As if it were pornography, two bodies reaching for each other – polished marble, classical erotic tension – suddenly become obscene. Are we paying symbolic jizya with our pixels?

It is the same theocratic prescription that triggered chaos at the Jacques-Cartier middle school in Issou, outside Paris, where teachers went on strike after receiving threats from Muslim students. During a lesson, a teacher showed first-year middle school students a 17th-century painting, Diana and Actaeon by Giuseppe Cesari, which depicts the passage from Ovid’s Metamorphoses in which Actaeon surprises Diana and her nymphs bathing unclothed at a spring.

The bronze copy of the Medici Venus, from the Uffizi Gallery in Florence, once belonged to Nazi Hermann Göring. It was sunk in the lake in front of his estate in 1945 and recovered in 1990. The original is in the Uffizi in Florence. The artwork is now “offensive” by woke standards: the Commissioner for Equal Opportunities decided that the bronze statue had to be removed from a federal office in Berlin-Weißensee.

Take Le Parisien: the major Paris daily pixelated the face of Muhammad when reporting on a teacher in the United States who lost her job after showing a celebratory miniature of Muhammad.

Freedom of expression has become an offense for which it is not worth risking assassination. Islamist terror has worked, transmitted and encouraged by the intellectual terror of a left that has bet everything on the Muslim electorate.

The blurred statue in Issy-les-Moulineaux is not a picturesque detail. It is the symptom of a surrender. And surrenders have never ended well for those who signed them. It starts with hiding the kippah, then the mezuzah, then the “blasphemous cartoons,” then the words “Eastern Christians” in advertisements and goes on to an innocuous statue. What is next?

Good night! Good Sharia!

israelnationalnews

Spanish authorities have launched an investigation into a public school in Madrid after 10-year-old students performed a pro-Palestinian play while dressed in military-style clothing resembling Hamas terrorists and carrying toy weapons, sparking outrage among the local Jewish community and political leaders.

Madrid’s Ministry of Education initiated an inspection into the school, located in the southern district of Puente de Vallecas, over allegations that the institution may have violated the political neutrality required in Spain’s public education system, the Spanish news outlet VozPópuli reported on Wednesday.

Shared widely on social media, footage from the anti-Israel school performance appears to show 10-year-old children dressed in military-style uniforms resembling members of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, wearing balaclavas, and holding toy rifles.

During the performance, the children could be heard chanting phrases such as, “With strength and courage, we will not surrender.”

Some of the girls wearing Palestinian keffiyehs were also heard chanting lines including: “We must wake up,” “Resistance and freedom,” “We don’t want to cry another day,” and “Raise the scarf high, lift your voice to the wind, shout freedom, do not be afraid.”

With the investigation now underway, local authorities have reportedly opened disciplinary proceedings against those responsible for the activity over concerns about possible political bias and inappropriate influence on the children.

Meanwhile, the school has defended the performance as a student-led initiative, seeking to distance itself from direct responsibility for the controversial activity.

Under Spanish law, the Madrid regional Education Ministry has repeatedly stressed the importance of keeping public school classrooms free from political ideology and activism. 

Authorities previously banned the display of Palestinian flags on the facades of public schools, a measure that drew fierce criticism from left-wing parties and activists.

Leaders within Madrid’s Jewish community have expressed outrage over the performance and are urging regional authorities to take action against the school, arguing that highly politicized activities of this nature should have no place in public education and demanding safeguards to ensure similar incidents are not repeated.

Like most countries across Europe and the broader Western world, Spain has seen a rise in antisemitic incidents over the last two years, in the wake of the Hamas-led invasion of and massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

Still, Spain stands out as one of the most extreme cases, with experts warning that antisemitic violence and anti-Zionist rhetoric have moved beyond a social phenomenon to, in many instances, being state-promoted and legitimized as a political tool.

In particular, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and several members of his socialist party have come under mounting criticism from some of the country’s political and Jewish leaders, who accuse them of fueling antisemitic hostility.

algemeiner

by Lars Møller 

The edifice of Western civilization, forged in the crucible of Judeo-Christian values—individual dignity under a transcendent moral law, ordered liberty, the sanctity of the vulnerable, and a commitment to truth over tribal expediency—is imperiled not by external conquest alone, but equally by internal subversion. 

In a world ravaged by unrest, Britain used to be a model of institutional stability, political pragmatism, and academic excellence. Now, however, it is being torn apart by ideologically inflamed barbarians. Thus, in contemporary Britain, a betrayal on a historical scale manifests with brazen clarity among certain Muslim Labour backbenchers and Green Party representatives, both local and national. These actors, cloaked in the rhetoric of human rights and anti-imperialism, have prioritized sectarian solidarity and electoral calculus over the foundational principles that have so far sustained British tradition: the rule of law, the protection of the innocent, and a common civic culture rooted in biblical ethics rather than imported theocratic impulses. To be sure, this goes way beyond policy divergence; it is an open repudiation of the West’s inheritance.

At the vanguard of this erosion stands Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party of England and Wales, the epitome of Lenin’s “useful idiot”—a figure whose ideological fervor blinds him to the forces that he empowers. Polanski, himself Jewish, with a bachelor’s degree in drama and sociology from Aberystwyth University in Wales, in addition to careers as an actor and hypnotherapist, has steered the Greens towards an aggressively pro-Palestinian posture, capitalizing on Muslim discontent with Labour’s Gaza policy. This strategy yielded tangible gains: council advances and the historic by-election victory in Gorton and Denton in early 2026, where Green candidate Hannah Spencer triumphed, pushing Labour into third place. 

Such successes reveal a deliberate electoral wedge: Gaza as the galvanizing issue fracturing Labour’s traditional Muslim base. Yet this opportunism masks a deeper rot. Multiple Green candidates faced suspension or investigation for antisemitic posts—conspiracy theories, hostage balloon vandalism, and dehumanizing rhetoric—prompting internal crises and public rebukes even from figures like Caroline Lucas.

Polanski’s response has been characteristically evasive: decrying antisemitism in general terms while framing Jewish concerns as “perception” versus “reality,” defending marches amid rising incidents, and prioritizing solidarity with Palestinian causes over rigorous vetting. Critics discern here the classic useful idiot’s folly: lending progressive legitimacy to currents that, unchecked, erode the very pluralism that Jews and Christians have historically defended. The Judeo-Christian tradition insists on the imago Dei—the equal worth of every human soul—which rejects both Islamist antisemitism and the cynical exploitation of minority grievances for power.

Polanski’s Greens, by courting votes through maximalist rhetoric on Gaza, have mainstreamed a sectarianism antithetical to British fair play and Enlightenment universalism. Factional statements from “Muslim Greens” and “Jewish Greens” ring hollow against the pattern of scandals. YouGov polling, while showing that Green voters broadly recognize antisemitism as a problem at rates comparable to other parties, cannot obscure the leadership’s selective blindness.

This dynamic finds sinister parallel within Labour. Muslim backbenchers and local representatives have weaponized the Israel-Gaza conflict to exert relentless pressure, demanding arms embargoes, harsher condemnations of Israel, and de facto alignment with pro-Palestinian independents. Several Labour MPs in Muslim-heavy constituencies faced deselection threats, protests, and abuse—not for insufficient moderation, but for perceived complicity in Israel’s defense. The outcome: electoral hemorrhage and a government treading delicately to retain its base.

This is rightly characterized as betrayal by incremental surrender. British tradition, steeped in Protestant dissent and Catholic social teaching alike, values just war principles, the defense of the innocent, and skepticism towards utopian revolutionary violence (as explained by the conservative thinker Edmund Burke). Framing Israel’s response to Hamas’s atrocities as “genocide” while downplaying October 7th’s horrors inverts moral clarity—a clarity that Judeo-Christian ethics demands.

The insidious defeatism has been compounded by the so-called “grooming gang scandal,” the nationwide trafficking and sexual abuse of British children, “white infidels,” by Muslim men. Like a jihadist celebration of dominance, the monstrosities expose the collision between imported barbarism and Western safeguards. Historical inquiries into Rotherham, Telford, and Rochdale documented systematic exploitation of predominantly white working-class girls by networks of British-Pakistani men. Authorities failed for years, paralyzed by moral cowardice and fear of “racism” accusations. Labour’s entanglement runs deep: many implicated councils were Labour-controlled, and the party’s embrace of the APPG definition of “Islamophobia”—portraying scrutiny of “Muslimness” as racism—has been suspected of chilling honest investigation.

Muslim Labour figures find themselves torn: compelled to condemn the “sickening” crimes for show while resisting any demographic framing that might stigmatize their communities. Some critics argue that this has fostered a culture of denial and censorship, where raising ethnic patterns immediately invites charges of Islamophobia.

Cultural pessimism deepens for good reasons. Judeo-Christian civilization elevated the vulnerable—widows, orphans, the child—above clan honor or collective defensiveness. Britain’s common law tradition, informed by this, once prioritized victim protection over communal sensitivities. Labour’s hesitancy on a robust national inquiry, favoring localized (and predictably corrupt) reviews, and accusations of pandering to pro-Gaza Muslim sentiment, signal a profound inversion: the state shielding perpetrators’ demographic profile to preserve electoral peace.

Labour complicity in the jihadist child rape scandal makes a mockery of compassionate governance; it is the subordination of native daughters’ safety to multicultural dogma. The open betrayal lies in Muslim representatives who, rather than unequivocally championing integration and unequivocal condemnation of such pathologies, play the victim card and frame discourse itself as the threat—importing a parallel moral universe where fitna (communal discord) trumps justice.

The intersection of imported Hamas belligerence and sexual jihadism reveals a unified assault on British cohesion. Pro-Palestinian activism has emboldened the targeted intimidation of individual MPs across parties, while consistent failures to expose the rape scandal and bring the guilty to justice underscore institutional capture by fear. Green representatives amplify the former; Labour backbenchers navigate the latter with conspicuous caution. Both erode the West’s core: a secularized yet Judeo-Christian-derived commitment to objective truth, individual rights, and national solidarity transcending tribe.

British tradition—magna carta liberties, parliamentary sovereignty, Christian-informed conscience—assumes a shared moral substrate. Mass immigration from incompatible civilizational spheres (e.g., North Africa, the Middle East, Afghanistan, and Pakistan), absent robust assimilation, fractures this. The consequence for society is not enrichment but balkanization: parallel societies where Islamist sympathies and cultural defensiveness supplant loyalty to the host civilization.

The trajectory is ominous. Demographic shifts, combined with elite reluctance to defend the historic nation, accelerate decline. Polanski’s useful idiocy and Labour’s sectarian balancing act exemplify a civilizational loss of nerve—the West’s self-flagellating elites sacrificing inheritance for transient votes and moral vanity. Judeo-Christian values, emphasizing stewardship, repentance, and ordered liberty, demand resistance: unapologetic assertion of Britain’s Christian-rooted identity, rigorous integration, and rejection of any faith or ideology claiming supremacy over democratic law. 

Aided by attention-seeking idiots such as Polanski (acting as a straw man), the betrayal of British tradition by socialists and Islamists coordinating their tactics—whether these distinctly unpatriotic forces operate from elected assemblies or the streets—portends anything but multicultural harmony. Instead, it heralds the dissolution of the West’s greatest experiment in ordered freedom. Civilization itself is under attack. And if there is a state of order after anarchy, it is the tyrannical order of the Caliphate.

americanthinker

At least 40 women in Scotland have been afflicted with brain tumors due to Pfizer’s Depo-Provera contraceptive injections, attorneys have disclosed, and the numbers are growing.

The lawsuits in Scotland are but a fraction of the global cases of women suing Pfizer over Depo-Provera-inflicted brain tumors, which often cause devastating effects and leave them disfigured. In the U.S., a Depo-Provera brain tumor multidistrict litigation (MDL) currently has 1,752 pending cases.

Women are suffering from sight loss, bulging eyes, epilepsy, headaches, and other harms following prolonged use of a contraceptive injection that they say they were never properly warned about. 

“You can’t put an atomic bomb equivalent of a medical device on the market and put a warning on it and think that you can get away with that,” Patrick McGuire of Thompsons Solicitors, which is representing the Scottish women in the lawsuit, told SkyNews.

“It’s just not that simple. The product wasn’t safe. The warnings were not that clear. And the women have suffered the most horrific injuries. They are entitled to compensation,” he said.

The attorney told Edinburgh Live that the national case is one of the “fastest growing” he has ever seen.

The Daily Record was the first to report that a study published in the British Medical Journal in 2024 found that prolonged use of Depo-Provera causes a heightened risk of developing meningioma brain tumours.

“Since the publication of the Daily Record investigation we have had thousands of interactions on Thompsons Scotland’s social media platforms and hundreds of phone enquiries. This has led to 40 cases now being pursued but that number will undoubtedly rise as many more cases are being assessed by my team,” said McGuire.

“It is very early days in this class action, but what is very clear is that Depo-Provera is implicated in horrifying adverse health outcomes from women across Scotland. It is one of the fastest growing legal actions I have ever experienced.”

One of the afflicted, Kirsty Moore, who took the shot for over 20 years, found out about her tumor in 2021 after she suffered from headaches and swelling in her right eye. She has since undergone four operations to remove the meningioma, which is growing on an optic nerve.

However, the tumor has continued to grow since these surgeries. Moore is now trying a “grueling” six-week regimen of radiotherapy to attempt to curb the growth.

“It’s shocking and I don’t doubt that many more women will come forward as time goes on. I hope these numbers encourage powers to ban the jab in Scotland,” she told Edinburgh Live.

Another Scottish woman, Lindsay Tinney, a 50-year-old mother of four, has been left epileptic from her tumor after a 10-hour brain surgery was performed to remove the meningioma, which was the size of a tennis ball by the time it was discovered. She took Depo-Provera for seven years.

The lawsuits against Pfizer complain that the pharmaceutical giant did not warn Depo-Provera users of the risk of meningiomas after prolonged use.

The pharma company has been subject to numerous major lawsuits over the past few decades, including one from Texas in 2023 for allegedly misrepresenting the efficacy of its COVID-19 shots and attempting to squelch public criticism of the experimental drug.

In fact, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has referred to Pfizer, along with other vaccine producers, as “convicted serial felon(s).” In January 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed “accusing Pfizer of hiding the fact that Zantac contains a carcinogen,” reported Becker’s Hospital Review. 

In 2009, Pfizer Inc. paid $2.3 billion, “the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice,” according to the DOJ, for illegally promoting drugs for off-label use or at unapproved dosages.

lifesitenews

A GB News investigation has uncovered social media posts openly advertising polygamous relationships in Britain.

Across Facebook groups men are openly seeking second wives, often attaching highly specific conditions for women willing to enter into plural marriages.

A Muslim matchmaking forum also allows users to filter options to include polygamy.

Some adverts on Facebook effectively resemble recruitment processes for shared husbands.

In one example seen by the People’s Channel, a man searching for a “second wife” stated any prospective woman would first need to pass an “interview” with his existing partner and children before being considered suitable.

The same advert added he could only “ensure 3-4 nights stay” and preferably wanted a woman with “their own accommodation as well”.

Another post, published openly in a British Bengali matchmaking group, saw a man advertise for an additional wife while explaining that any second wife would likely spend most of her time living separately from him.

Women were instructed to send “CV and pictures” for consideration.

In another example reviewed by Britain’s News Channel, a woman posted on behalf of her husband seeking “a suitable match as a second wife”, adding that the ideal candidate should understand “the dynamics of a plural marriage”.

The adverts are not hidden away on obscure websites.

Many are posted openly inside large Facebook matchmaking groups with thousands of members across Britain.

We also identified a dating platform openly facilitating users seeking plural marriages.

The matchmaking app Muslima – available on both Apple’s App Store and Google Play and accessible in the UK – allows users to filter matches based on whether they “accept polygamy”.

Under the app’s advanced filters, users can select options including “Accept polygamy”, “Maybe accept polygamy” or “Don’t accept polygamy”.

Civil polygamy, which refers to the legal recognition of having multiple spouses at the same time by the state, is against the law in the UK.

However, polygamy can continue to be practised purely in a religious or customary context, such as where an individual has multiple spouses simultaneously as sanctioned by religious texts or cultural traditions, rather than under secular civil law.

In these circumstances, no offence will have been committed, but the arrangement would not be recognised by law and instead the partners would be legally considered unmarried cohabitants.

Controversy has intensified following revelations British taxpayers are still funding certain overseas polygamous households through the welfare system.

Last month, figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions showed from April 2026, second, third and fourth spouses in qualifying households will each receive £125.25 per week in Pension Credit or Housing Benefit.

Under the rules, the main claimant and first spouse can receive £363.25 per week, with additional weekly payments added for each extra spouse living in the household.

The arrangements apply only to marriages legally contracted overseas in countries where polygamy is lawful before the families moved to Britain.

The system means the UK bans civil polygamous marriage domestically while still recognising certain overseas plural marriages financially once families arrive in the UK.

The DWP previously said in a statement: “There are rules in place to ensure there is no financial benefit for claiming from a polygamous household.

“Only marriages that took place in a country where the practise is legal are recognised. As a result, very few, if any, households claim this way.”

gbnews

A Conservative Peer has claimed that Brexit boss Nigel Farage has been banned by one of the BBC’s top music programmes, despite it hosting other top party leaders and supposedly being bound by the public broadcaster’s commitment to impartiality.

According to an upcoming biography of Lord Ashcroft, BBC Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs programme will never host Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as it did with Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the Times of London reports.

The Tory peer, citing sources from within the British public broadcaster, claimed that Farage has “effectively been blacklisted” from the programme over fears that his mere presence would upset the staff of the long-running programme in which guests are asked which eight recordings they would take with them in a hypothetical stranding on a deserted island.

“Farage is regarded instinctively by many BBC staff as unacceptable. At least half the staff would think Radio 4 had become an ‘unsafe space’ if he was on Desert Island Discs. Nothing would be written down, it’s just classic liberal-left BBC,” the source is said to have told Lord Ashcroft.

“It’s impossible to state quite how snobbish it is, especially on this kind of programme where political bias goes unrecognised. I also think they’re worried that if Farage went on, other potential guests might start a boycott.”

A Reform UK spokesman told The Times that the party had reached out to the BBC to inquire if it would host Mr Farage on the programme, but such overtures were shut down.

Responding to the claims, Mr Farage said: “I have come to expect nothing less from the BBC — their blatant bias has been obvious for years. The BBC will have a rude awakening under a Reform government.”

The Reform leader also redoubled his call to “abolish the BBC licence fee, a mandatory fee for anyone who watches television in the UK that funds the BBC in exchange for supposedly providing bias-free news.

The public broadcaster has long faced accusations of bias, particularly regarding the 2016 Brexit referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union. While a majority of the country backed the campaign to leave the bloc, this sentiment was not reflected in the BBC’s coverage.

According to a study by the News Watch think tank, which analysed Radio 4 coverage of the issue, there was clear evidence of bias. The report stated, “There were no attempts in any programme to explore the benefits of leaving the EU, but conversely, Brexit came under sustained negative attack.”

A separate report from the Civitas think tank found that in the ten years before the Referendum, just three per cent of guests on BBC Radio 4’s flagship Today programme held Eurosceptic beliefs. The programme was also found to have consistently excluded pro-Brexit voices from the left of the political spectrum, falsely giving the impression that the desire to leave the European Union was confined to the right.

Polling has consistently found that the public views the broadcaster as biased and untrustworthy.

The BBC has denied that it has banned Mr Farage from Desert Island Discs, with a spokesman saying: “We do not ban any individuals from appearing on Desert Island Discs and that includes Mr Farage.”

breitbart

On Monday evening, a 31-year-old Indian national stabbed an employee of the REWE supermarket to death in the Altona district of Hamburg.

The confrontation began outside the grocery store around 9:30 p.m. before spilling into the building itself. Once inside, the suspect assaulted the worker with a knife in front of horrified shoppers and staff members. The 29-year-old victim died from numerous stab wounds to his upper body.

Bystanders contacted the police right away, and the assailant gave himself up peacefully to responding officers, according to the German outlet Nius. Notably, other public media outlets like MDR, which are financed through compulsion by German citizens, made no mention of the man’s nationality.

Though paramedics rushed to the scene and attempted to revive the victim, he succumbed to his injuries after being transported to a hospital emergency room. Specialists were also deployed to assist shocked onlookers who witnessed the event.

Store security managed to recover the weapon, described as a combat knife, and the suspect was booked into a detention center. The local homicide unit has launched an investigation to determine exactly what provoked the deadly encounter.

MDR added that both the attacker and the victim knew each other, but no motive has yet been established.

German supermarkets have been the scene of some brutal cases in recent years, including one in 2024 where a Syrian national stabbed a 4-year-old girl at random in the city of Wangen im Allgäu.

Recently, Lutz Richrath, the boss of over a dozen Rewe supermarkets in the Cologne region stated he was looking into shutting down the supermarkets in the inner-city due to the real problems related to assaults, thefts, and homelessness.

He said the “problems are really very clear —and they have only gotten worse.”

Indians have never had a large representation in Germany, which means they have generally stayed out of the headlines when it comes to high-profile crimes. However, the country’s Indian population is rapidly growing, especially in major cities. In Berlin, the Indian population has grown by 1,059 percent increase in just the last ten years.

rmx

Germany’s controversial Section 188 of the Criminal Code has come under renewed scrutiny after courts imposed substantial fines on citizens for insulting Chancellor Friedrich Merz online.

According to prosecutors in Heilbronn, a Facebook user was ordered to pay a fine of more than 2,000 euros after referring to Merz as “Lügenfritz” (“Lying Fritz”) in a comment posted under a police announcement about the chancellor’s visit to the city last year.

The public prosecutor’s office argued that the remark had the potential of  “undermining confidence in the victim’s integrity, because it was liable to foster further negative prejudices or even aggression among like-minded individuals.”

Another user received the same punishment for calling the Chancellor “Ftzn Frieder”—a vulgar insult—while other cases involving terms such as “Pinocchio,” “Lügen-Kasper” (“lying clown”) and “Lügenbaron” (“baron of lies”) were either dropped or dismissed by prosecutors.

One case involving the insult “Lackaffe” (equivalent to “pompous fool”) was suspended after the defendant agreed to pay €100.

The prosecutions were brought under Section 188, a provision that criminalises insults, defamation, and slander against political figures when authorities believe the remarks could damage public trust in their integrity or hinder their political work.

The controversy has been fuelled by a series of high-profile prosecutions in recent years.

Among the most widely discussed was the case of Bavarian pensioner Stefan Niehoff, whose home was searched after he shared a satirical meme referring to then-Economy Minister Robert Habeck as a “professional idiot.”

Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, a leading figure in the liberal FDP party, has also reportedly filed thousands of complaints against online critics accused of insulting her.

Critics argue that the law effectively grants politicians a privileged legal status unavailable to ordinary citizens, and that politicians should be expected to tolerate harsh criticism and ridicule.

The provision has become increasingly controversial as the number of investigations has surged in recent years. Official figures show thousands of cases are now being referred annually to prosecutors, with authorities and activist reporting organisations actively monitoring online speech.

The latest rulings prompted fresh condemnation from the opposition Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). In a statement, the party argued that “special rights for politicians must not exist” and that all citizens should be treated equally before the law.

As Sabine Beppler-Spahl writes for europeanconservative.com:

Paragraph 188 is unworthy of any free society. In a democracy, citizens must have the right to express their frustration with those who govern them. Attempts to suppress that frustration mean evading precisely the debates and struggles that demand political clarification—and that should therefore be seen as hallmarks of a healthy democracy, not threats to it.

Efforts to repeal the provision have so far failed. In January, the Bundestag voted against a proposal by the AfD to abolish Section 188, with all other parliamentary groups opposing the motion.

europeanconservative

The Labour Party government and the liberal ruling class are terrified.

The same trend is observed in most countries of the Western world: under the pressure of suicidal globalist policies implemented by their governments, citizens are turning to populist, right-wing and conservative parties in search of sensible policies.

Everywhere you look, anti-globalist forces are leading the polls or experiencing strong growth: the US, the UK, France, Germany… and even in Japan and Latin America, the trend is clear.

Now, this shift to the right has reached Australia, where the populist  One Nation party  overtook the ruling Labor Party and led a national opinion poll for the first time.

Bloomberg  reported:

According to a Redbridge Group/Accent Research poll published in the Australian Financial Review, support for One Nation rose 4 percentage points to 31% compared to a previous survey conducted before the budget presentation on May 12, while support for the center-left government fell 3 points to 28%. The poll, conducted between May 25 and 28, surveyed 1,005 voters and has a margin of error of 3.4%.

Sky News  reported:

“One Nation has become the most popular political party in the country, while the Labour Party falls to its lowest level in history amid continued fallout from the government’s failure to meet budget promises.

[…] One Nation has snatched away Labour’s traditional electoral base, with 35 percent of the working class intending to vote for Pauline Hanson’s party.

“One Nation’s surge in the primaries is coming from working-class voters, who have historically favored the Labour Party,” said Paul Smith, director of public data at YouGov. “Working-class voters make up the majority of the electorate in most constituencies, so the battle for the working-class vote between Labour and One Nation will decide the next election.”

gatewayhispanic