Allah's Willing Executioners

A fundamental principle of a just society is that even if the laws themselves are unjust, they apply to everyone equally. If they don’t, it’s a tyranny.

Here’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2020.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took a knee during a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Ottawa on Friday.

Trudeau’s act of solidarity comes after he declined to comment earlier in the day about whether he would be attending the protest. Still, he arrived at Parliament Hill — home to Canada’s Parliament — wearing a black cloth mask Friday afternoon and surrounded by security guards, according to CNN affiliate CTVnews.

Trudeau did not speak at the event, though he clapped and nodded along with some of the other speakers, including a moment when a speaker asserted there is no middle ground on racism. At another point, he yelled “Amen” along with other protesters after a speaker discussed promoting love and justice.

Now, Trudeau has escalated the crackdown on civil rights by unleashing emergency powers against the trucker protest in Ottawa. 

Trudeau insisted that the truckers don’t represent a peaceful protest. While I have issues with protesters blocking roads, no matter what cause they represent, you either treat everyone equally or you don’t.

There was zero practical justification for hauling out emergency powers to deal with what basically amounted to a giant sit-in, a tactic that has a long civil rights tradition behind it, let alone using language about insurrection, let alone seizing assets, and treating political opponents like terrorists.

That actually is tyranny and terror.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which unlike the ACLU is still a functional civil rights group, noted that, “The Emergencies Act can only be invoked when a situation ‘seriously threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Canada’ & when the situation ‘cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada.’

The CCLA is well on the Left and spends a good deal of time crying racism, but it can still point out the obvious here.

 This is not an emergency that requires the suspension of civil rights and democratic norms, it’s a vocal protest that the government finds threatening enough (not physically, but politically) that it’s resorting to criminalizing and suppressing it, not because it meets any objective standard, just a political one.

“It is now clear that there are serious challenges to law enforcement’s ability to effectively enforce the law,” Trudeau argued. 

That’s often the case in Toronto, but no amount of crime and deaths has resulted in the imposition of emergency powers.

Toronto had the third deadliest year on record with 84 murders. How many people died during the Freedom Convoy?

Trudeau is literally reviving measures intended originally for a state of war to deal with political opponents in order to “restore confidence in our institutions”.

That’s what totalitarian regimes do. And that’s what Trudeau now represents.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2022/02/trudeau-who-took-knee-blm-imposes-tyranny-and-daniel-greenfield/

The French parliament has outlawed any individual or organization from exerting any pressure on a person to have a heterosexual sexuality, including pressure exerted by parents on their children. In addition, the French justice system has just ordered that men should be allowed to appear as the second mother of their children on birth certificates if they wish so.

France’s new law, which was originally said to be against “conversion therapies,” is actually titled the “Law of 31 January 2022, forbidding practices aiming at modifying a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.” It prohibits “repeated practices, conduct, or speech intended to change or suppress a person’s actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.”

The penalties for offenders are €30,000 or €45,000 and two or three years’ imprisonment depending on whether the “victim” is an adult or a minor. This includes parents who try to discourage their children from engaging in “sex change” practices or treatments and who seek to encourage them to take the path of what is a more healthy and normal sexuality in their eyes.

One safeguard has been added to the original bill filed by one of Emmanuel Macron’s MPs, as there is no offense when “repeated remarks only invite caution and reflection, particularly in view of his or her young age, on the part of the person who is questioning his or her gender identity and who is considering a medical course of action leading to a sex change.”

However, this leaves much room for interpretation by judges who may, “when the offense is committed by a person having parental authority over the minor,” decide “on the total or partial withdrawal of parental authority.” Thus, children may be removed from their parents’ care if the latter seek to encourage them to accept their biological sex and have a heterosexual sexuality.

It is worth noting that, in France, encouraging children to see themselves as “transgender” or homosexual and to consider a “sex change” procedure is not punishable by any law.

The law passed in January also added the notions of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” to that of “sex” in the paragraph of the Code of Criminal Procedure that allows associations subsidized by the French state to prosecute people they consider guilty of discrimination. This means that, from now on, any alleged discrimination based on sexual orientation or “gender identity” authorizes these associations to sue citizens for damages, which is a French specificity that strongly limits freedom of expression.

All political parties in French Parliament unanimously voted in favor of this law, including Marine Le Pen’s National Rally in its drive to strengthen its “respectability” in the run-up to the presidential elections in April and the legislative elections scheduled for June. On the day the law was enacted, Éric Zemmour, the other right-wing candidate against Emmanuel Macron for the April presidential election, tweeted: “The ‘macronie’ proposes to teenagers to change their sex as early as 13 years old. I will be the President who puts an end to this ideological nightmare.”

A few days after the entry into force of this totalitarian law called for by the LGBT lobby, the Court of Appeal in Toulouse, in the southwest of France, rendered a judgment that will also serve as a landmark case. The judgment recognized a man in his fifties as the mother despite his child being conceived in a natural way, using his male sexual organs. The court agreed the man could be labeled the “mother” because he considers himself a “transgender woman,” and had registered his “sex change” with the Civil Registry.  

“The court has issued a ruling that enshrines a major advance for the fundamental rights of transgender people,” the man’s lawyer rejoiced.

In a sign that the state is fully behind these progressive ideological positions, the French Public Prosecutor’s Office, acting under the authority of the Ministry of Justice, supported the man’s request, with the only reservation that a mention of the sex change in the civil status of this “second mother” be made in the margin of the birth certificate of the man’s daughter. However, even this reservation was rejected by the Court of Appeal in Toulouse.

“This was an extremely important point: such a mention would have stigmatized the child and the parent because of trans-identity,” the plaintiff’s lawyer wrote in praise.

The French left-wing newspaper Libération, a great supporter of gender ideology, tells the story of this mother-man as follows:

“Claire was born in a man’s body in 1968. Two first children were born from his union [with a woman], in 2000 and 2004. In February 2011, Claire obtained in court to have her civil status changed to correspond to her gender identity: female. While she still had her male attributes, she conceived a baby girl, in 2013. Shortly before the child’s birth, Claire established before a notary a ‘prenatal recognition of child, which she declared to be of maternal – albeit gestator – nature.’ The couple then wished to have this recognition transcribed on the child’s birth certificate, but the civil registrar in Montpellier was opposed to it, arguing that only adoption could allow Claire to have her filiation link recognized. Such a solution was not acceptable for the family, who then began their long legal battle.”

The next step in the French liberal-leftist revolution will probably be to make the use of surrogate mothers legal, so as to allow men who are “married” to each other to conceive children. Already, the French public media is intensifying the promotion of this practice after the bioethics law passed last year allowed, as Emmanuel Macron wanted, women who are “married” to each other to conceive children through medically assisted reproduction (artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization).

https://rmx.news/france/france-going-full-lgbtqi-with-ban-on-conversion-therapies-and-listing-men-as-mothers-on-birth-certificates/

Canadian Prime minister Justin Trudeau on Monday invoked a war powers act in the shape of the “Emergencies Act,” to put down the very successful anti-vaccine Freedom Convoy as a “terrorist” movement.

Fundraising platform GiveSendGo was declared a terrorist financier for helping the embattled truckers while banks and financial service providers will be able freeze or suspend their accounts without a court order.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland explained how these new emergency powers would grant the expansion of “Terrorist Financing” rules to target crowdfunding efforts in support of the Freedom Convoy. “First we are broadening the scope of Canada’s anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so they include crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers they use,” said Freeland.

The “Emergencies Act” was invoked in a bid to shut down nationwide peaceful protests against his draconian mandates. The trucker protest in Canada has also spawned a global anti-vaccine blockade movement.

The Emergencies Act, which has replaced the War Measures Act, describes a a national emergency as a temporary “urgent and critical situation” that “seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it”.

Ottowa has witnessed dancing crowds and children on jumping castles. It is therefore not clear which lives are being “endangered” by the protests.

Very cool! Some footage I shot for @TPostMillennial at the big freedom protest in Ottawa was on Tucker Carlson.

"According to Justin Trudeau, everyone you saw in that tape is a terrorist. Even the kids in their bouncy castles." pic.twitter.com/aqrz24eigj

— Beth Baisch 📸 (@PuffinsPictures) February 15, 2022

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, who was the first premier in Canada to announce an end to vaccine passports in his province, followed by Progressive Conservative Premier Heather Stefanson in Manitoba, was joined by Quebec Premier Francois Legault and Alberta Premier Jason Kenney to denounce Trudeau’s plan to invoke the Emergencies Act.

Acuitas Therapeutics owns the lipid nano particle delivery system, which is used in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. It is alleged the Trudeau Foundations owns 40 percent of the common stock of this company and Justin Trudeau ordered 10 times more vaccines than there are Canadians, including the moose. The company is paid a royalty for every shot.

Canada WINS every time
there’s a shot. 🇨🇦 💉

Justin Trudeau ordered 10 times more vaccines than there are Canadians.

h/t @OmaGunn pic.twitter.com/N6MDGgQDiH

— Agent Brandoe 🍊 The Pipe Hitter (@BYounger13) February 2, 2022

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/15/war-powers-act-canadian-truckers-see-the-rise-of-a-petty-tyrant/

A 53-year-old Tunisian man was sentenced to one year in prison without parole for a sexual assault on an eight-year-old girl and an attempted groping of a 14-year-old girl.
He was invited to a birthday party in a village in North Béarn on this August 31, 2020. He is on trial on Monday for an attempted sexual assault on the 14-year-old daughter of his hosts, but also for touching an 8-year-old girl while her parents took the girl home to Pau.
” I think this is impossible. I didn’t do anything, Madam Judge, I swear”. These are practically the only statements made by 53-year-old Karim Zouaoui in the court dock. In view of the testimonies of the two girls, he denies…

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/02/15/lyon-une-adolescente-de-15-ans-agressee-sexuellement-dans-le-train-par-un-algerien-le-pere-de-la-victime-est-intervenu-pour-secourir-sa-fille/

According to our information, an underage girl was the victim of a sexual assault on Monday evening at around 7pm on a train coming from Paris-Bercy and arriving at Lyon Part-Dieu station. The victim’s father, who went to pick her up, stopped the assault under circumstances that have yet to be clarified.

The alleged perpetrator, an Algerian national who claimed to have no fixed address, was arrested by railway security officers who were quickly summoned. The officers escorted the youth, who according to a source was about 15 years old, to a police station.Lyon Mag

https://www.fdesouche.com/2022/02/15/lyon-une-adolescente-de-15-ans-agressee-sexuellement-dans-le-train-par-un-algerien-le-pere-de-la-victime-est-intervenu-pour-secourir-sa-fille/

In the case of an attempted rape, the Vienna Freedom Party (FPÖ) has criticised the information policy of the police and accused them of political calculation. “After several cases of politically motivated withholding of information on incidents, the Vienna provincial police directorate has a serious need for explanation,” said the provincial party chairman of the Vienna FPÖ, Dominik Nepp, to the weekly JUNGE FREIHEIT on Monday. “While a press release is made about every small violation of the mask ordinance at anti-government demonstrations,” there had been an attempt to conceal the attack of an asylum seeker on a young woman.

At the end of last week, for example, the police in the Austrian capital had only reported that a Syrian asylum seeker had tried to rape a 22-year-old woman when asked by the newspaper Kronen-Zeitung. However, the woman fought back with a knife and seriously injured the attacker.

Police located the man near the scene of the crime and arrested him after his injuries were treated at a hospital. At the time of the assault, the Syrian man, who was known to the police, had been intoxicated and was also in possession of drugs.

The public prosecutor’s office in charge reported the victim of the assault for bodily harm. In an interview with the newspaper, the woman’s lawyer described this as an “absolutely insensitive approach”.

In Austria, the murder of a 13-year-old girl had made headlines and caused consternation last year. The teenager had been drugged, raped and killed by several Afghans. This sparked a discussion in the country about how to deal with criminal asylum seekers.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/ausland/2022/fpoe-syrer-polizei/