Pope Leo praises migrants to Europe days after gruesome Belfast attack

Edgar Beltrán,CC-BY-SA-4.0,Wikimedia Commons

Pope Leo XIV, in remarks on Thursday, praised migrants to Europe, just days after a migrant from Muslim-majority Sudan attacked and attempted to behead a man in Northern Ireland.

In his June 11 speech to migrant humanitarian workers, Pope Leo called on European nations to respect the “human dignity” of migrants and said that helping migrants must not be a “secondary issue” for the Church.

The American pontiff, who has downplayed illegal immigration and the impact of mass migration on native populations since the start of his pontificate, notably omitted any mention of the gruesome attack on and attempted beheading of a 40-year-old man by a Sudanese immigrant on a visa just two days earlier or any of the recent attacks perpetrated by migrants across Europe.

Appeal to migrants and European nations

“Dear migrants: Before I say any more words to you, I want to bow before your dignity. You are not numbers, nor files! You are people with a family and a home you left behind, with dreams that no one has the right to despise,” Leo said. “But I also want to tell you that your life must be protected. Do not hand over your existence to those who haggle over it. Don’t believe anyone who promises easy havens, in exchange for your body, money, silence, or freedom. Those false promises are ‘siren songs,’ they are industries of death.”

“Your drama must become an examination of conscience: for the nations of origin, which must create conditions of peace, justice and development; for the transit nations, called upon to protect and not to leave the weak in the hands of criminal networks; for Europe, which cannot proclaim human dignity and get used to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic being gravestones without gravestones; for the international community, call for effective and persevering cooperation,” Leo continued.

While Catholic social teaching affirms that immigrants should be treated with dignity and respect, as the Holy Father suggested, it also notes that a country has a right to secure its borders. In the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB’s) “Catholic Social Teaching on Immigration and the Movement of Peoples,” the conference outlines that countries are under no obligation to accept all who wish to enter.

Though Leo himself has affirmed this teaching against “open borders,” he only practically ever discusses respecting the human dignity of immigrants, making no distinction between legal and illegal immigrants, and not the right of nations to deny entry to immigrants as they deem necessary.

It’s also interesting that the pope brings up the risks of sex trafficking and other harms to which migrants are often afflicted. Indeed, data from the International Organization for Migration (IOM) found that at least 7,667 people died or went missing on migration routes worldwide in 2025, which comes to 25 migrants a day.

But what the pontiff and the IOM fail to recognize is that the most effective way to prevent migrants from becoming victims of trafficking or dying en route to another country that they may be trying to enter illegally is for them to remain in their native countries.

Belfast attack and other recent attacks by illegal aliens

Just two days before Leo made his remarks, a Sudanese migrant on a visa who has been identified as Hadi Alodid in Belfast allegedly attempted to behead a 40-year-old man later identified as Stephen Ogilvie. The grotesque attack was interrupted by members of the public, one of whom was carrying a hurley, a heavy stick used in the Irish games of hurling and camogie.

Though Ogilvie is now in stable condition, he lost his left eye and sustained deep cuts to his head, face, and back during the attack.

It has since been reported that Alodid originally traveled from Sudan to Paris, and then from Paris to Dublin, before taking a bus to Belfast in February 2023 and promptly claiming asylum. He was given leave to remain in the UK seven months later.

In another egregious case in the UK, a 28-year-old Pakistani asylum seeker named Sheraz Malik raped an intoxicated 18-year-old woman. Malik was sentenced to 10 years in prison on Thursday.

Closer to the Vatican, in Milan, a Polish model, Anna Aksamit, was physically assaulted and sexually harassed in broad daylight last week by men suspected of being part of a “maranza,” gang, or groups of young North African immigrants who have been plaguing Italian cities. Though the suspects have not yet been identified.

Still, Leo’s remarks made no mention of any of these recent attacks or any of the dangers of mass migration on the native population.

Reception of migrants not a ‘secondary issue’

The pontiff further stressed his belief that the Church itself must not treat the reception of migrants as a secondary moral issue.

“The Church must also allow itself to be questioned. The reception of migrants cannot be anything secondary, nor can it be delegated only to a few volunteers. We kneel before the altar to worship Christ present in the Eucharist, from whom we receive the strength and motivation to live charity: for this reason we cannot then ‘pass over’ before cayucas and pateras, since from prayer every service flows and to it all commitment returns,” he said.

In addition to coming across as “tone-deaf” given the recent sadistic crimes being committed by migrants flooding Europe, these remarks also echo Leo’s previous statements that falsely equated the “mistreatment of migrants” with abortion. The Holy Father made these remarks last fall while appearing to defend heterodox Cardinal Blase Cupich’s decision to honor radically pro-abortion Senator Dick Durbin with a lifetime achievement award.

“Someone who says I’m against abortion, but I’m in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life,” Leo said at the time.

While comparing the “ill treatment of migrants,” which of course the Church has always condemned, to the slaughtering of millions of innocent unborn children each year unborn is bad enough, the pontiff’s comments also ignore the reality that secure borders, which he appears to oppose, actually save lives by preventing the heinous crimes listed above. A better sentence might have been, “Someone who says I’m against abortion, but I’m in agreement with flooding nations with illegal or unvetted immigrants who go on to commit violent crimes against that population, I don’t know if that’s pro-life.”

Catholic prelates opposed to mass migration

While the 267th pontiff has taken nearly every opportunity to praise mass migration, several notable Catholic prelates have denounced the practice.

In 2017, Cardinal Robert Sarah, in remarks at Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Poland, called out the “outside forces” who try to impose on Poland and other European nations without assimilating.

“In what manner is it possible to remove the rights of the nation to distinguish between a political or religious refugee, who must flee from his homeland, and the economic migrant, who wants to change his address without adapting himself, identifying with, and accepting the culture of the country in which he will live?” Cardinal Sarah asked.

The Guinean cardinal also underscored the importance of rebuilding nations that have suffered from war and other injustices without uprooting the people of other countries and called out those who “exploit the word of God” to justify the promotion of multiculturalism.

“I say again that we must work together to rebuild the nations that have fallen victim to war, corruption and injustice, but this does not mean encouraging the uprooting of peoples and the destruction of nations,” he said. “Some people exploit the Word of God to justify the promotion of multiculturalism and gaily take advantage of the excuse of hospitality to justify the admission of immigrants.”

In 2018, Bishop Athanasius Schneider offered similar sentiments, telling an interviewer from Milan’s Il Giornale that “the phenomenon of so-called ‘immigration’ represents an orchestrated and long-prepared plan by international powers to radically change the Christian and national identities of the European peoples.”

lifesitenews

Germany: AfD’s Weidel addresses migrant gangs making underage German girls sex slaves, the left responds with laughter

Screenshot X

During a session in the Bundestag, Alternative for Germany (AfD) leader Alice Weidel described a case from Nuremberg in which migrants allegedly subjugated underage girls with drugs and forced them into prostitution. Her speech was met with loud interjections in the plenary session, including laughter. According to the official Bundestag minutes, a specific MP, the Left Party’s Katrin Fey, laughed at this specific point in the address.

Weidel had responded to the government statement by Chancellor Friedrich Merz and sharply attacked his policies, describing his words as the “chant of a failed individual“ while accusing the federal government of economic policy failure, continued immigration into social systems, and a catastrophic deportation record.

She then spoke about the consequences of migration policy for internal security. Weidel said that “violent, sexual and crude offenses are not ‘cold statistics,’ but daily companions of fear and ‘concern for our children.”

The AfD chairwoman then detailed the case at the Nuremberg Central Station, where young men from Syria, Iraq, Pakistan and North African countries are alleged to have driven girls between the ages of 13 and 18 from precarious circumstances into drug addiction in order to force them into prostitution.

At this point in the speech, the Bundestag chamber grew loud with several heckling incidents. While the initial livestream did not make it clear who was laughing, the official Bundestag minutes later attributed the laughter to Left Party MP Katrin Fey, who serves as the spokesperson for civil and human rights in her parliamentary group, chairwoman of the Committee on Human Rights and Humanitarian Aid, and a member of the Committee on Internal Affairs.

The official minutes also recorded a shout from Green Party MP Mayra Vriesema at that moment. Weidel continued her speech and asked: “How many Nurembergs are there in Germany? And what have you all – yes, everyone here – done to our country through mass migration, brutalization, and moral decay?“

The broadcast camera then showed Chancellor Merz with a serious expression. While the AfD parliamentary group applauded Weidel, further heckling occurred, including from the Left Party and Green Party MPs.

It remains unclear what exactly was so funny about migrant gangs raping young girls in Nuremberg that it would prompt the laughter from Left and Green Party MPs. In the United Kingdom, tens of thousands of young White girls were raped in the most barbaric fashion, mostly enabled as a matter of government record by left-wing and anti-racist ideologies that led police and authorities to ignore the issue out of fear of being called racist. Girls were raped by dogs, whiskey bottles, and hundreds of Muslim men, according to official police and investigative reports.

Although nothing on this scale has yet been described in Germany, more and more reports are arising of similar foreign gangs plying young girls with drugs, getting them hooked, and then turning them into sex slaves.

The same trend is present in France as well, as documented by Remix News. There, the sex trafficking trade is almost entirely dominated by foreign gangs from North Africa, sub-Sahara Africa, and Eastern Europe.

In her speech, Weidel also attacked Federal Minister of Labour Bärbel Bas. The SPD politician recently caused outrage with her statement that “nobody is immigrating to our social systems.” She further claimed that in another speech that Germany before mass immigration was a “uniform brown” and “gray,” a statement that led some politicians to call for her resignation.

Weidel referred back to Bas’ statements in her latest Bundestag speech, stating: “Anyone who speaks like that hates their own and themselves and has no place in a government.”

The Left Party itself has had a long history of refusing to confront the problem of sexual violence and Germany’s migrant population.

Jan van Aken, who just retired as the co-head of the German Left Party weeks ago, claimed in March of this year that the most prominent cases of gang rape involved all White men during his appearance on a German podcast show hosted by Ben Berndt. Remix News fact-checked his claim.

“So let’s start with gang rape. So the most prominent cases we know of are all white men. Epstein, gang rape, Gisele Pelicot in France, gang rape, all by white men,” said van Aken.

Van Aken further stated: “Gang rape exists, it’s a huge problem. But to pretend that this is a migration problem, I would put a big question mark over that.”

Remix News delivered an in-depth fact-check on his claim, which found his statement was clearly false. In addition to refuting his first claim about only White people being involved in cases of high-profile gang rapes, German statistics also paint an entirely different picture from van Aken’s claim about migrant violence. Germany-wide, approximately 50 percent of all gang rape arrests involve foreign nationals, which predominantly come from North African, Middle Eastern, and sub-Saharan African countries.

rmx

Polish journalist who investigated Tusk’s ally detained for three months without trial

Investigative journalist Leszek Kraskowski (C) who has been detained for three months. (Source: Leszek Kraskowski’s Facebook account)

A journalist who has investigated the activities of Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s family attorney and ruling party MP Roman Giertych has been detained for three months on allegations of illegally owning an air pistol and making threats against a police chief.

Award-winning independent investigative journalist Leszek Kraskowski, who has for over 20 years investigated allegations of the abuse of power and corruption against all governments, was deprived of his right to legal counsel for several days after his arrest on June 6 and subsequently placed in pre-trial detention for three months by order of a court issued on June 9.  

Only a few hours passed between a complaint filed on the day of the arrest by the head of a local police department near Warsaw and the search of the journalist’s home and his detention. 

According to the prosecutors controlled by the centre-left government led by Donald Tusk, Kraskowski sent an email containing threats against the life of a local police chief in the town of Piaseczno and is alleged to have written a threatening social media post. The prosecutors have also reported that Kraskowski has been accused of aggressive behaviour against his family and that a psychiatric assessment of the detainee has been ordered. 

A search was carried out on Saturday, during which a gas pistol was found in the journalist’s possession. Prosecutors submitted a petition to the court requesting that Kraskowski be held in pre-trial detention for three months on June 8 and a day later the Piaseczno town district court approved that request even though no defence lawyer was present. 

According to unofficial findings reported by Niezalezna, the case concerns an Italian-made Bruni Mod. P4 9 mm P.A.K. alarm pistol, a device available for purchase online for a few hundred złoty and not adapted to firing live ammunition.

As sources available online indicate, it is not adapted for firing live ammunition and does not constitute a firearm designed to discharge projectiles. The P4 model operates using 9 mm P.A.K. (Pistole Automatik Knall) cartridges, i.e. blank or gas ammunition intended for alarm pistols. An alarm pistol of this type can  be purchased online, and its cost is around €75.

Kraskowski’s attorney Łukasz Pawelski was informed about his client’s arrest just minutes before the court hearing and could not make it on time. According to the prosecutors they tried to contact the attorney on the day before the court hearing but the defence lawyer says there was just one call which he twice tried to return without success and no text message or email. 

On June 11 Pawelski had still not been able to meet his detained client and had not been handed documentation relating to the case. The attorney does not even officially know where Kraskowski is being held.

He reminds that even though the law guarantees a temporary detainee access to their attorney that request has to be approved by the prosecutor and that in this case this has not as yet been granted, “a very curious situation which puts into doubt the right to my client’s defence”. 

However Pawelski has discovered that accusations about alleged aggression against daily members have emerged after and not before he was arrested and may relate to the fact that in his private life Kraskowski is currently engaged in acrimonious divorce proceedings. The accusations of alleged aggression were used by prosecutors as part of the justification for the three months detention ordered by the court 

Pawelski also claims that Kraskowski does not use the email account from which the death threats against a local police chief are alleged to have been made. 

In months preceding his arrest, Kraskowski had filed a criminal complaint concerning an incident at his home. 

Kraskowski alleges that he was attacked by an unidentified assailant. 

“Some guy in Piaseczno was waving a knife in my face and holding a canister of pepper spray in his other hand repeating: ‘You’ve crossed the wrong people. You have seven days to leave the country, otherwise we’ll finish you off. We’ll throw you out of your house. We’ll kill you. Get the hell out to Albania.

‘I’ll stab you, and when the police arrive, I’ll say you attacked me and that it was self-defence’”, the assailant is claimed to have said. 

According to Kraskowski it took the police three hours to arrive, identified the alleged assailant and let him go after the man had denied he had said anything or used any weapons in approaching the journalist. 

Kraskowski has for years been investigating Roman Giertych, the Tusk family’s attorney and currently also a MP for the ruling Civic Coalition (KO) in connection with allegations that Giertych took part in a money laundering operation involving one of his clients.

Giertych was charged in connection with the allegations during the time of the last Conservative (PiS) administration and left the country for one of his residences in Italy before returning to the country to fight the election in 2023. 

After the election Giertych initiated the investigation against former PiS ministers in connection with allegations about misappropriation of funds from the Justice Fund that led to indictments against former justice minister Zbigniew Ziobro. Charges against Giertych relating to the laundering allegations have been dropped by the prosecutors. 

Before becoming a close ally of Tusk, Giertych had led the right-wing League of Polish Families party that after opposing Poland’s accession to the EU was a part of the ruling coalition led by PiS between 2005 and 2007. Giertych served as deputy PM and education minister in that government but fell out with PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński and has since been one of PiS’s biggest enemies.

Following the alleged assault on him and an alleged firing of pellets at his car, Kraskowski spent some time in Albania to which he often travels. During his stay in Albania a notice was issued for his arrest as a result of a private defamation suit filed by Jan Piński, a journalist who is a friend and ally of Giertych.  

According to Kraskowski that detention order was legally flawed because pre-trail detention cannot be initiated via a private prosecution. 

After returning home and learning that the police had made no progress in investigating the offences he alleged had been committed against him, Kraskowski reacted angrily on platform X posting that he no longer had any confidence in the police being able to protect him and was “taking matters into his hands”, attaching a photo of an air gun. The post was later used in the prosecution’s case against him before the court. 

His frequent travel to Albania was also used as an argument in the prosecution’s detention petition to the court as being evidence of a serious flight risk. 

Kraskowski’s  situation has sparked protests from Poland’s journalistic community and parts of the political scene with statements issued by journalistic organisations, including the Polish Journalists Association and Press Club Polska, as well as the country’s  Ombudsman Marcin Wiącek who has called for an investigation.

The state media regulator (KRRiTV) has called the arrest “drastic action” which follows documented provocations against other media such as the police acting on false alarms about events taking place in the homes of TV Republika journalists. 

KRRiTV in its statement on the case says that “freedom of speech is always threatened when the government of the day takes action against journalists that are critical of it”.

Robert Mazurek, commentator for popular YouTube broadcaster Kanał Zero slammed the authorities’ actions. 

“If as the prosecution hints Kraskowski is in need of psychiatric care why has he been detained in prison rather than being sent to a psychiatric hospital on observation?” he asked.

Mazurek also suspects the whole case may relate to Roman Giertych taking revenge on a journalist who had investigated him and the present justice minister wanting to appease Tusk’s attorney.

“It is common knowledge that Tusk is dissatisfied with the results of the work of the present justice minister Waldemar Żurek because the campaign of pursuing former PiS officials is not yielding results and rumours about Giertych replacing Żurek are circulating. Therefore the minister is under pressure and may be more willing than before to please both Tusk and his attorney Giertych”, argues Mazurek. 

The opposition PiS believes that the case is political and aimed at scaring journalists. 

 “We have gone down the path of Lukashenko and Putin,” commented PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński on X.

“If those in power are conducting a hunt for independent journalists and putting them in prison, it is a sign not of strength, but of weakness,” Kaczyński wrote.

Former justice minister Zbigniew Ziobro also condemned the action.

 “A new, dangerous reality is emerging in Poland, selective authoritarianism. A demoralised government has turned the justice system into a tool of repression against those who most effectively challenge its interests. Today, these methods are being used against an investigative journalist who has become a thorn in the authorities’ side. In the future, they may be used against anyone who stands in their way or becomes too troublesome for them”, said Ziobro.

The European Commission has on several occasions in its rule of law reports on member states criticised Poland for its temporary detention regime, voicing concerns that it is being used as a way of extracting confessions and punishment without trial. However no Polish government of any political colour has seen fit to act to restrict the practice.

brusselssignal

Britons Won’t Be GASLIT with LIES Any Longer + Starmer Wants to Scan YOUR Phone

{YouTube CC-BY 4.0}

On today’s show the panel discuss the epic gaslighting of the British people following the attempted beheading of Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast and the murder of Henry Nowak in Southampton. Also, Keir Starmer has given Big Tech 3 months to set in place the means to scan everyone’s phone for child pornography. Can we trust Big Tech and the state with our phones?

IRELAND: Transgender Child Care Worker Fired After Offering To “Kiss” Child As A “Prize”

A trans-identified male has lost an employment discrimination case after alleging that he had been wrongfully fired from his job at a childcare center in Letterkenny. The Workplace Relations Commission found that Aleena Starshine had been terminated not due to his gender identity, but as a result of repeat parental complaints and concerns about child safeguarding.

According to the Commission’s report, Starshine was first hired to the Craoibhin Community Enterprise Centre on November 7 of 2024. The Centre is a community-based facility focused on providing créche and after-school programs to children from 6 months to 12 years of age.

Within one week of being hired, two separate complaints of a serious nature had been lodged against Starshine, who was placed to work with children from 5-12 years of age.

The first complaint pertained to a “safari game” Starshine had organized with the children, during which he offered an 11-year-old child “a free kiss from me” or a “big kiss” as a prize. The child reported this to a parent, who then filed a complaint with the facility. An investigation was launched, and Starshine was confronted about the comment and admitted to making it.

Facebook posts shared by Starshine rail against JK Rowling, TERFs, and those who suggest trans people are pedophiles.

According to a submission to the Workplace Relations Commission by a representative of the Craoibhin Community Enterprise Centre, investigators were particularly concerned at this point because Starshine did not appear to “appreciate or understand why the comment was problematic in a safeguarding context.”

The next incident involved yet another safeguarding concern in which Starshine reportedly released a child to the care of an adult during a pickup without verifying the adult’s relation to the child or having any other adults present. When confronted, Starshine once again “did not accept that any safeguarding issue arose, instead characterising the practice as normal.”

Following the second incident, Starshine was suspended with full pay while a thorough investigation was conducted. The Child and Family Agency (Tusla) was also notified of the complaints against Starshine, and his employment was ultimately ended in February of 2025.

In July of 2025, Starshine filed a complaint with the Workplace Relations Commission alleging he had been discriminated against on the basis of his gender identity.

The background of the complaint, which refers to Starshine using feminine pronouns, reads that he “alleges that she was discriminated against on the gender ground.”

In his rendition of events, Starshine was dismissive of the complaints against him, and even suggested that the mother of the child he admitted to offering to “kiss” was transphobic.

“The letter in the original complaint is highly suggestive of gender discrimination. The author of that letter was [NAME REDACTED BY REDUXX]. She is the mother of a child who uses the Respondent’s service. She was the mother of the child who was offered a free kiss,” Starshine wrote in his complaint to the Commission.

The Workplace Relations Commission case was adjudicated by Niamh O’Carroll, who determined that Starshine had failed to demonstrate he had been the victim of discrimination.

“There are no facts before me from which I could conclude that the Complainant’s employment was terminated on discriminatory grounds related to gender,” O’Carroll wrote in her decision. “The evidence before me clearly demonstrates that the Complainant did not successfully complete her probationary period due to concerns regarding her professional judgement, safeguarding awareness, and recognition of appropriate professional boundaries, and for no other reason.”

reduxx

Women’s group approved by German bishops demands abortions in Catholic hospitals

The Catholic Women’s Association of Germany (kfd) has demanded that abortion be carried out in Catholic hospitals.

The kfd adopted a position paper, titled “Between the Protection of Life and Self-Determination: Positions and Perspectives of the kfd on Section 218 of the German Criminal Code,” at its assembly in Mainz last weekend.

The document states: “The kfd demands that abortions must also be available in Catholic hospitals.”

The group argued that Catholic hospitals not offering abortions “endangers the physical and mental health of those with unwanted pregnancies.”

The kfd is Germany’s largest Catholic women’s association with around 265,000 members. Other than supporting access to abortion, the group also called for free access to contraceptives and health insurance coverage for abortion. The Catholic Church has categorically condemned both abortion and the use of contraception.

Additionally, the group has called for ordaining women to the priesthood and passed a resolution in 2020 declaring that membership with Germany’s conservative AfD party is a disqualifying factor for joining the kfd. The German Bishops’ Conference has approved the group’s statutes as an official Catholic lay organization under canon law.

The heterodox German women’s association also went after the pro-life movement, stating that it is “against fundamentalist and anti-democratic instrumentalizations of the issue.”

“The kfd also closely monitors the so-called ‘pro-life activists,’ who for years have been loudly and aggressively claiming to ‘protect every life’ through rallies such as the ‘March for Life’ and ‘1,000 Crosses,’” the group said in its paper.

“In many countries, including Germany, sexual and reproductive rights are being challenged and attacked by radical right-wing forces and religious fundamentalists,’ kfd continued.

Under the Church’s labor law in Germany, doctors in Catholic hospitals are not permitted to perform abortions, and the German state has tolerated this exception so far.

The kfd did affirm the fact “that life begins with the fertilization of the egg” but still supports the murder of the unborn because, the group states, it seeks to harmonize letting women choose whether to carry the pregnancy to term with “respect for life from the very beginning.”

The Catholic Church has always unequivocally condemned abortion as murder and therefore a mortal sin.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) states:

Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or as a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law: “You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.”

Moreover, formal cooperation in an abortion carries the penalty of automatic excommunication. The 1983 Code of Canon Law states: “A person who actually procures an abortion incurs a latae sententiae excommunication.”

lifesitenews

White Working-Class Students Most Disadvantaged in Britain’s Education System: Inquiry

Government statistics have revealed that working-class white students are the demographic most disadvantaged by the British education system, despite receiving next to zero attention in the broader zeitgeist.

While much of the societal energy is placed on improving the lot of ethnic minorities, it is, in fact, working-class white boys who are actually in need of attention and assistance.

According to government figures shared with broadcaster ITV as part of the Independent Inquiry into White Working Class Educational Outcomes, white working-class students are nearly twice as likely to be absent from school compared to other groups.

The report also found that white working-class students were two and a half times more likely to be severely absent, or missing over 50 per cent of lessons.

The statistics from the inquiry also revealed that 34 per cent of white working-class students were in need of special education assistance, as opposed to 19 per cent among all other groups.

Education Secretary Phillipson said that it was “clear that white working-class kids get amongst the worst outcomes in the education system.”
“That’s not to say there aren’t other disparities, and we absolutely will tackle those too. One of the biggest indicators is obviously class background and the amount of money that your family has,” she said. “That’s why tackling child poverty is such a big priority for this government.”

When pressed on what the government intends to do to reverse the situation for working-class whites, she said the government will launch a Mission North East scheme later this year to improve outcomes, but was unable to give specifics.

“I think I do have to be honest in saying that we do have some big ideas about things we want to do to make this work better… But if we had all the answers, we would have solved it by now,” she said.

While not often discussed in the legacy media or commonly addressed by establishment politicians, the fact that white working-class students, boys in particular, have fallen behind other groups in terms of academic success has been well established for years.

Some, including former Oxford University don Professor Peter Edwards, have postulated that it is in part a result of it becoming a “taboo” topic among government and educational officials, given that it is only politically correct to discuss the supposed plight of women or ethnic minorities in Britain.

However, Prof Edwards previously warned Parliament in 2020 that if not addressed, the country is facing potentially “grave socio-economic and socio-political consequences”, in artificially creating an aggrieved segment of the population, particularly if other races continue to be provided with DEI-style positive discrimination efforts to give them a leg up.

“This will surely lead to the disturbing narrative of a vicious spiral downwards. This is an utterly critical point; we must not only utilise the huge untapped potential there must surely be in this group of White Working-Class Boys, but also recognise the very real threat of the destabilisation of the very fabric of the country,” he predicted.

Among major parties, only Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has vowed to fully repeal all DEI and anti-white discrimination from the books in Britain and replace them with merit-based systems.

Shadow Education Secretary Suella Braverman has said that a Reform government would repeal the Equality Act, which she noted
“institutionalises DEI in our public sector by placing legal duties on public servants to treat minority groups differently.”

Braverman has also railed against the woke culture which seeks to demonise white boys and elevate ethnic minorities, saying last month: “The drive to pander to minority communities has completely undermined and pushed aside white working-class boys and their families. When English children are taught to hate themselves and their country because of the colour of their skin and told to apologise for their ‘privilege’ is it any wonder so many feel worthless and don’t do well at school?”

breitbart

RN councillor recites Hail Mary in French municipal council after Communist mayor refuses to ban veiled women

Screengrab X

Rassemblement National (RN) councillor Kevin Nader caused a stir in France by publicly reciting the Hail Mary prayer while holding a crucifix, after the communist mayor rejected his secularist proposal to ban religious symbols, including Islamic veils,  in the council chamber.

A scene unfolded during a municipal council meeting in Ivry-sur-Seine on Thursday evening when Nader proposed an amendment to the council’s internal regulations to enforce strict secularism and prohibit visible religious signs for elected officials and attendees.

Several women wearing Islamic veils were present in the public gallery during the session.

The proposal was immediately rejected by the long-standing Communist mayor Philippe Bouyssou, whose municipality has been run by the French Communist Party for over 110 years.

After the amendment was voted down, Nader said, “Since you refuse to be placed under the sign of secularism in this municipal council […] We will be placed under the sign of the Cross.”

He stood up, produced a crucifix, and recited the full Hail Mary prayer aloud.

Mayor Bouyssou, visibly upset by the use of the Catholic symbol, reacted furiously, calling the act a “political crime” and immediately suspending the session.

“It’s a shame, a real scandal. In a few hours of council, you have reached all the heights and crossed all the red lines,” Bouyssou yelled, accusing Kevin Nader of having “stigmatised municipal councillors”.

“The Ivry municipal council has never been insulted in this way.”

He later referred the matter to the prefect of Val-de-Marne, accusing Nader of undermining republican values and attempting to provoke division.

Nader defended his action, stating that he was simply highlighting the mayor’s “two-tier secularism”.

He argued that allowing veiled women in the council while refusing to enforce neutrality amounted to anti-laïcité bias.

“Either secularism applies to everyone, or it applies to no one,” he said.

brusselssignal

Italian School Punished Pro-Italy Banner but Allowed Palestine Flags

A high school in the Italian city of Cesena that recently punished two students for displaying a banner reading “Italy for the Italians” is facing fresh scrutiny after Palestinian flags and “Free Palestine” signs were reportedly displayed in classrooms without disciplinary action.

The claims stem from footage published by the Italian newspaper Il Giornale, which reported that Palestinian flags were displayed in several classrooms at Monti High School during lessons. Students interviewed by the newspaper, speaking anonymously, also said that “Free Palestine” signs were visible in the school at various points throughout the academic year.

The reports come weeks after the school drew national attention for sanctioning two students for displaying a banner reading “Italia agli italiani” (“Italy for the Italians”), a decision that triggered a wave of reactions regarding the limits of freedom of expression within educational institutions.

According to Italian media reports, the students received a negative conduct grade and were required to complete an additional educational assignment. Being patriotic was punished with re-education.

Those who question the school’s actions argue that the two episodes reveal an unequal application of internal rules. They maintain that if the school considers the display of political or identity-related messages inappropriate within its premises, the same standard should be applied consistently regardless of the cause being promoted.

Supporters of the school administration, however, argue that the two situations are not comparable and that messages related to the conflict in the Middle East arise from different circumstances.

The school administration has not publicly explained why the alleged Palestinian displays were treated differently from the “Italy for the Italians” banner, a question that has become central to the growing controversy.

europeanconservative

Venezuelan migrant goes on trial behind closed doors for brutal rape and murder of Polish doctoral student

A Venezuelan migrant accused of the brutal rape and murder of a Polish doctoral student has gone on trial behind closed doors in Toruń, one year after the attack that shocked the city.

Yomeykert Josue R.-S. is charged with murdering 24-year-old Klaudia K., a doctoral student at Nicolaus Copernicus University who also worked as a bartender at a student club.

The assault took place around 1:00 a.m. on the night of June 11-12, 2025, in Glazja Park, located in the Jakubskie Przedmieście district.

According to local police, a bystander heard the woman’s screams and quickly intervened, scaring off the attacker and calling the authorities. Police patrols were immediately dispatched, including units from outside the city.

Klaudia was found with multiple stab wounds to the head, neck, and back, and she had been sexually assaulted.

The suspect was tracked down and arrested shortly after attempting to flee the scene.

He was later charged with murder after Klaudia succumbed to her injuries, passing away in hospital on June 27.

The first hearing opened on Thursday at the District Court in Toruń. The defendant was brought into the court building on Piekary Street under heavy police escort and placed in a glass-enclosed dock, with a Spanish interpreter seated beside him. He was represented by a court-appointed lawyer.

The Polish Press Agency (PAP) reported that Judge Grzegorz Waloch, who is presiding over the six-member panel, ordered the trial to be held without the public or media present. He cited the welfare of the victim’s family, the need to ensure the proceedings ran properly, and the risk of “potential disruption of order and security.”

According to the indictment, the defendant intended to kill the young woman and inflicted multiple wounds to her head, neck, and hands. Prosecutors say she lost consciousness and was left helpless before being sexually assaulted.

One of the stab wounds caused irreversible brain damage, according to the prosecution. Klaudia K. was taken to Toruń City Hospital but never regained consciousness.

Yomeykert R.-S. has been charged with murder with particular cruelty, an offense that carries a possible life sentence. Prosecutors said the evidence gathered during the investigation justified the charge.

When questioned as a suspect, he refused to answer the charges and exercised his right to remain silent.

He was later placed under forensic psychiatric observation. Experts concluded unanimously that he was sane at the time of the alleged offenses and was capable of understanding the meaning of his actions and controlling his behavior.

The indictment also accuses him of threatening another Toruń resident in April 2025. Prosecutors say he brandished a knife at the man inside an apartment, then later stood outside and made a throat-slitting gesture after seeing him at a window.

The killing of Klaudia K. caused widespread public outrage in Toruń. After her death, around 20,000 people took part in a silent march through the city streets in her memory.

rmx