Netherlands: Girl accused of murdering parents identified as ‘transgender’ boy

The suspect (L) with her parents. Source X

 A Dutch teenage girl arrested for murdering her parents had a history of gender confusion, to the point of identifying herself as a boy as well as a dog.

The Hungarian Conservative reports that the couple identified so far only as Johan and Mathilda were found stabbed to death in their Meerstad home after their 15-year-old daughter reportedly sent photos of their bodies to classmates using WhatsApp. Police also found the family’s golden retriever with stab wounds, but not killed. (It is also speculated, but not confirmed, that she injured her family’s pet cat on a previous occasion.)

Dutch media interviews with classmates and neighbors paint a picture of a girl long struggling with mental issues. She reportedly wanted to be identified as a boy before deciding to identify as and act like a dog, wearing fake ears and tail as she would “crawl around on all fours and bark while running through the school corridors,” running through her neighborhood late at night, sitting on fences, and hiding in bushes. 

Authorities have not yet commented on the girl’s mental state or publicly confirmed a motive, but many horrified observers have suggested the crime is yet another consequence of affirming youth gender confusion rather than addressing the mental issues it signifies, thereby allowing the latter to fester.

“Giving rage-inducing hormones to mentally ill people obviously greatly increases risk of murder and suicide,” tech mogul Elon Musk commented.

A large body of evidence shows that “affirming” gender confusion carries serious harms, especially when done with impressionable children who lack the mental development, emotional maturity, and life experience to consider the long-term ramifications of the decisions being pushed on them, or full knowledge about the long-term effects of life-altering, physically transformative, and often irreversible surgical and chemical procedures.

In 2024, National Health Service (NHS) England’s landmark Cass Review found that “gender medicine” is “built on shaky foundations” and that “[w]hile a considerable amount of research has been published in this field, systematic evidence reviews demonstrated the poor quality of the published studies, meaning there is not a reliable evidence base upon which to make clinical decisions, or for children and their families to make informed choices.”

In April, a study of “all under-23-year-old gender-referred individuals between 1996 and 2019” in Finland (2,083 people) found that those who had gone through “gender transitions” had “markedly higher psychiatric morbidity [other mental health issues] than controls before and after referral, with treatment needs often persisting and even intensifying after medical interventions.”

lifesitenews

Petition forces Daniel Cohn-Bendit to cancel Montpellier event over historic paedophilia comments

Wikimedia Commons, Hyohyo75, CC-BY-SA-4.0

Former Green MEP and May 1968 icon Daniel Cohn-Bendit has cancelled a planned book presentation in Montpellier after a petition signed by over 7,200 people protested his appearance, citing his past statements on child sexuality.

The event, scheduled for June 30 at the municipal Salle Pétrarque, was intended to promote his new book Souvenirs d’un apatride.

Local resident Bérengère Dubus launched the Change.org petition, describing the invitation as “an insult to all victims and a blank cheque for paedophilia.”

“Invite Cohn-Bendit to talk about Europe? And why not Epstein to talk about finances?”, she stated in the petition description.

The petition gained rapid support across political lines and forced the cancellation.

Dubus is founder and leader of the Union des Intermédiaires de Crédit (UIC), the first national union for mortgage and finance brokers in France.

She also has been visible on issues like family, child protection, local governance, and economic freedom, but is not a household name in France.

Cohn-Bendit, a co-founder of the German Greens and long-serving French Green MEP, has faced repeated scrutiny over comments made in the 1970s.

In his 1975 book Le Grand Bazar, he described erotic encounters with children while working at an alternative kindergarten in Frankfurt.

In a 1982 appearance on the Apostrophes television programme, he stated: “The sexuality of a kid is absolutely fantastic, you have to be honest. When a little girl of five starts undressing you, it’s fantastic, it’s an erotic-maniac game.”

He has repeatedly described these passages as provocative fantasy and a product of the era’s anti-authoritarian climate, insisting he never committed any sexual abuse.

Former kindergarten parents and children later defended him publicly.

Nevertheless, the remarks have resurfaced periodically and remain a source of deep controversy.

Cohn-Bendit’s history with the issue extends to the broader 1970s–1980s debates within parts of the German Green movement, which at times included calls to decriminalise certain forms of adult-child sexual contact; a chapter the party later formally regretted.

Daniel Cohn-Bendit has been a prominent and committed euro-federalist.

In 2012, he co-authored the book “For Europe” with Guy Verhofstadt, calling for a full post-national federal Europe, with much stronger EU institutions, a European government, and reduced national veto powers.

brusselssignal

UK: Tajikistani migrant jailed after subjecting girl, 13, to ‘abhorrent’ train sexual assault

The sex offender has been sentenced to 12 years in prison plus a two-year extended licence | BRITISH TRANSPORT POLICE

A Tajikistani migrant has been jailed after subjecting a 13-year-old girl to an “abhorrent” sexual assault on a train.

Abdulmanon Aliev, 50, was jailed for 12 years at Inner London Crown Court yesterday.

In April, he was found guilty of attempted rape, two counts of assault by penetration and three counts of sexual assault.

Described as a “despicable sex offender”, Aliev approached the teenager through a translator app on a train heading into London from Essex on June 16 last year, a court heard.

When the girl attempted to move away from the Aliev, he followed her and eventually trapped her in by sitting in an aisle seat next to her.

He proceeded to subject her to a drawn-out sexual assault, the court heard.

Aliev had denied the offences, claiming he only touched himself in front of the 13-year-old girl due to a skin condition.

British Transport Police Constable Elizabeth Cahill said the case was “one of the most abhorrent sexual assaults” she has ever investigated.

“Aliev singled out a vulnerable child and subjected her to one of the most abhorrent sexual assaults I’ve ever investigated.

“While the focus of attention will rightly be on him as the despicable sexual predator that he is, I want to pay tribute to the brave victim who reported him to police.

“His conviction and 12-year jail term would not have been possible without her account of what happened and her willingness to support our investigation.

“We take every sexual offence report extremely seriously, and we’ll stop at nothing to ensure vile offenders like Aliev are put behind bars where they belong,” she said.

Originally from Tajikistan, a country located in central Asia, landlocked by Afghanistan, China, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, the sex offender was living in Rye Lane, south east London.

After the assault, the victim departed the train at Fenchurch Street station and boarded another one going back the way she came, leaving Aliev behind.

She bravely retold what had happened to her to members of the public after she was found in a distressed state, who informed the police.

The British Transport Police launched an investigation to identify Aliev, analysing hours of CCTV to track his movements before and after the assault.

On June 27 he was apprehended by plain clothes police officers in Peckham, south London.

His home address was searched, with officers seizing the clothes he wore on the day of the attack.

He will be on the sex offenders register for life.

The victim and her family have been supported by specialist officers.

gbnews

UK: A vulnerable woman was raped in the car park of the hospital she had just left; a 27-year-old Pakistani delivery driver was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He had attempted to flee to his country of origin

Sussex Police

A delivery driver who raped a vulnerable woman in a car park after she had left hospital has been jailed.

The victim had attended Worthing Hospital “intoxicated, confused and unsteady on her feet” before Suleman Mukaish grabbed her, forced her onto the bonnet of a car and attacked her on 11 March, Hove Crown Court was told.

The 27-year-old was arrested two days later at Gatwick Airport with a one-way ticket to Pakistan.

Mukaish, from Worthing, West Sussex, admitted rape at an earlier hearing and was jailed for eight years and three months on Tuesday.

He will spend a further three years on extended licence.

The woman had attempted to hold on to the wall to stop him before the attack, the court was told.

She was found a short time later by a member of the public and said that she had been raped.

Police were called and the woman was able to identify the car, where hand and fingerprints were found.

Sentencing Mukaish, Judge Christine Henson KC said that the woman had been “at her most vulnerable when you, a complete stranger, raped her over the bonnet of a car in the car park adjacent to the hospital that she had just left”.

She added that the psychological impact on the woman had been “immense” and that she was unable to return to the hospital because of flashbacks.

The court heard that Mukaish was in the UK on a student visa with graduate leave until 2028. He had studied computer science and passed a master’s degree.

His defence said that he claimed he saw the woman in trouble and stopped to assist her.

Mukaish claimed that the woman asked him for money and he offered it “essentially on an understanding” that he could do what he wanted, the defence counsel said.

The barrister said that Mukaish accepted the woman did not have capacity to consent.

bbc

Estranged Husband of Former Scottish PM Sturgeon Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison – Peter Murrell Pled Guilty of Stealing $500,000 in Party Funds (VIDEOS)

Sturgeon and Murrell in happier times – Wiki Commons,Scottish Government, CC-BY-2.0

Sturgeon insists she knew nothing of her husband’s crimes.

Today (23), former Scottish National Party chief executive Peter Murrell was sentenced to over five years in prison.

The estranged husband of former Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon admitted embezzling more than $540,000 of SNP party funds to buy luxury items such as cars and a motorhome.

Reuters reported:

“Murrell, 61, is the estranged husband of ex-SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, who ​suddenly resigned in 2023, shortly before she was arrested as part of the probe ​into the party’s finances. She was cleared of wrongdoing in March last ⁠year.

He pleaded guilty last month to embezzling £400,310 from the SNP between 2010 and 2023, using the ​money to buy several vehicles, as well as items from luxury brands such as Estee ​Lauder and Harrods. He was jailed for five years and three months at Edinburgh High Court on Tuesday.”

The judge said Murrell’s actions ‘involved a significant breach of trust to the organization’ that he led.

“This was a calculated crime of dishonesty. Let me make it ​clear to you, one factor in the sentence which I impose today will be to act as ‌a ⁠deterrent to any senior officials in other large organizations who might be tempted to abuse their position in the way you did.”

Sturgeon insisted she was innocent, saying she had ‘no knowledge or suspicion whatsoever that he was ​using SNP funds for personal purposes’.

“Sturgeon said she had not spotted the ​large motorhome, ⁠which cost £124,550, parked outside her mother-in-law’s house when they went to visit.”

Politico reported:

“The manner of embezzlement, although not particularly sophisticated, included the fabrication of invoices, and you gave false information to junior members of staff to then put into the accounting system,” [Judge Andrew Young] added.

[…] John Scullion, Murrell’s lawyer, said his client is ‘overwhelmed by feelings of embarrassment and shame’.

Murrell was led away from the court in handcuffs after hearing his sentence.”

thegatewaypundit

Pedophile, Rapist, and Murderer Are Behind Oregon Lawsuit Demanding Transfer of Trans-Identified Male Inmates to Women’s Prisons

The class-action lawsuit brought against the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) demanding to house all trans-identified male inmates in women’s prisons was brought by a pedophile, a rapist, and a domestic abuser who murdered his girlfriend, Reduxx can reveal. At the end of April, a federal judge ordered the ODOC to reassess its policies and house trans-identified males on the basis of their “gender identity” in a sweeping injunction.

The initial complaint, filed in September 2025 on behalf of men identified only as “S.D.” and “J.F.”, alleges that housing males who claim a transgender status in men’s prisons violates their constitutional rights. S.D. and J.F. v. Mike Rees, et al. argued that when the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) chooses not to transfer trans-identified males into women’s prisons, the authorities are subjecting them to cruel and unusual punishment and sex-based discrimination, citing the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Currently, the ODOC reserves the right to deny trans-identified males transfers to female prisons. In particular, decisions whether to house a transgender inmate in a male or female facility must be made on a “case-by-case basis whether a placement would ensure the inmate’s health and safety, and whether the placement would present management or security problems.” The suit also seeks “mandatory staff training” and “immediate protective measure for all transgender inmates who report abuse.”

Bizarrely, the sex-based discrimination claim argues that the ODOC violates trans-identified male inmates’ rights by housing the criminals based “solely on the basis of their genitalia.” The complaint states that 90% of male inmates who claim a female gender identity are not transferred to the prisons of their choice “without genuine consideration of gender identity or safety” for violent male convicts. Housing inmates according to their sex, the suit argues, is a practice “widely condemned by medical and correctional authorities, including the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).”

Inmates S.D. and J.F. both allege sexual abuse while incarcerated in a men’s prison, as well as “transphobic harassment,” such as correctional officers “misgendering” them by using masculine pronouns, and “deadnaming,” or calling them by their given names. S.D. reports that he has been accused of “lying” or “misusing the grievance process” when filing complaints of sexual abuse.

While the identities of the inmates included in the suit were anonymized in the court ruling, Reduxx has now confirmed the identity of three of the men involved.

Inmate “J.F.” is Jessica Anne Marie Foust, previously known as John Jay Chapman. He has been designated as a “vulnerable” inmate by the ODOC, and asserts that he is “a legal female.”

In 2008, Chapman was sentenced to 25 years in prison for raping a developmentally disabled woman who resided at an adult foster home in Gresham, Oregon, managed by his mother. While incarcerated, Chapman was convicted on four counts of assaulting a correctional officer. Three years later, in 2015, he began to identify as transgender.

Prior to joining the class-action lawsuit, Chapman had attempted to sue the Oregon Department of Corrections for mistreatment. In 2023, Chapman brought a lawsuit against the Department for “cruel and unusual punishment” pertaining to the brightness of the lightbulbs used in his cell during sleep hours. The suit was ultimately dismissed earlier this year after a court found that the lighting was the equivalent of residential nightlights and required for basic security, and did not constitute a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights.

The class action suit also includes the experiences of inmates identified as “Z.Z.” and “L.B.” Reduxx can identify Z.Z. and L.B. as “Zera Lola Zombie” and “Lillithia Moon Blood-Gaia.”

Zombie, born Daniel Lee Smith, is a violent trans-identified male who is classified as a “female” inmate in the Oregon inmate directory and is housed in women’s prison Coffee Creek Correctional Facility (CCCF). He is serving a 35-year sentence for charges including the brutal murder of his girlfriend, Samantha Brown. In 2014, Brown was beaten to death, her corpse left in the trailer home she and Zombie shared. While the motive for the crime was never made clear, Brown was survived by four young children.

Zombie began identifying as transgender in 2020 and started a hormone regimen around that time. He has since changed his name and gender marker on legal documents, and has routinely filed lawsuits against the ODOC claiming discrimination on the basis of his “gender identity.”

Zombie first filed a lawsuit against the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) in 2021 alleging he had suffered discrimination on the basis of his gender identity. Amongst the grievances, Zombie claimed he had been subjected to “ongoing harassment” by staff and fellow inmates while incarcerated at male institutions. When housed at the Two Rivers Correctional Facility for male inmates, he has claimed he has been branded a “liar” and a “troublemaker” by staff, seemingly for submitting continuous complaints about his housing, cellmates, treatment, and other day-to-day factors he deemed unsatisfactory.

In his 2021 suit, Zombie argued that the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) had violated his rights by housing him in a men’s prison, and by placing him in a cell “with a known sexual predator” serving a sentence for “violence against women.” He stated he was “deliberately and maliciously” misgendered by correctional officers during his time in a male prison. The suit also claimed that Zombie “is a female person who was previously regarded as being a male person.”

Following the launch of his suit, Zombie was briefly transferred to the Coffee Creek Women’s Correctional Facility, but was quickly moved back to the male estate just weeks later for unknown reasons.

In 2023, Zombie received a “vulnerable” designation by an Oregon Court, entitling him to special protections and privileges.

In an amended complaint filed in December 2023, Zombie makes bizarre allegations regarding an incident when he refused to be strip searched by male correctional officers. Upon his refusal and repeated requests to have a female officer conduct the strip search, Zombie says he was placed into segregation, where he urinated on himself and told an officer, “I have small breasts, I can’t bear the thought of showing these men my breasts and my booty.”

The complaint describes Zombie being taken to the strip search area “in only her bra and urine-saturated underwear… on full display,” and states that Zombie was “crying and kept repeating, ‘Please don’t judge my body.’”

Bizarrely, the amended complaint also alleges that the strip search was uniquely difficult for Zombie because his genitals had retracted inside of his body – something that is not known to be a side effect of the ingestion of feminine hormones by men.

In 2026, Zombie was transferred back to women’s prison CCCF and awarded a payout of $295,000 as a result of a federal civil rights lawsuit alleging the Oregon Department of Corrections had violated his rights by housing him in a men’s prison.

“Lillithia Moon Blood-gaia”, identified in the suit as “L.B.”, was previously known as Nova June Gaia and Joseph Daniel Neilson. Gaia is a convicted pedophile who was first arrested in 2018 at a property in Portland, Oregon after being reported for sexually assaulting a child he was babysitting. The exact nature of the relationship between Gaia and the victim is being withheld by Reduxx for the purposes of protecting the child’s identity and safety.

On September 3, 2018, Gaia was watching over two children, a girl and a boy, at a home in Clackamas County. According to the police report obtained by Reduxx, while taking the girl to the bathroom, Gaia licked the girl’s genitals. Later on that same day, Gaia fondled the girl’s vagina.

The girl would eventually disclose the abuse and Gaia was visited by police less than two weeks later. During questioning, Gaia asserted that he had accidentally molested the child while playing with her.

Bizarrely, Gaia claimed that the girl’s pants and underwear had fallen off while they were “play-fighting,” and that he had touched his fingers and mouth to her genitals repeatedly by “accident.”

When placed in custody, Gaia’s legal sex was male and he had a full beard. But despite there being no indication Gaia identified as transgender prior to his arrest, in July of 2019, while awaiting sentencing, Gaia submitted an inquiry to his jail asking when he would be transferred to Coffee Creek — Oregon’s only women’s prison.

Gaia would ultimately be convicted on 6 counts related to the sexual abuse of the girl, and was convicted on one count of felony Sodomy and one count of Sexual Abuse in the First Degree. He was sentenced to 24 years in prison, and, according to the Oregon offender directory, his earliest possible release date is in 2043.

In the recent lawsuit, Gaia claims he and the other men “endured repeated sexual abuse, physical assaults, psychological torment, and retaliation simply for existing as trans women in men’s prisons.” He additionally alleges he was “verbally harassed and sexually threatened by prisoners and staff” while housed at male facility Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI).

As a result of the lawsuit, U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a preliminary injunction blocking the placement of trans-identified males in men’s facilities and ordered the Oregon Department of Corrections to conduct individualized assessments for all trans-identified males in custody.

“It is undisputed in the record before the Court that this default presumption, and their overwhelming placement in men’s prisons, has exposed transgender women inmates to a high risk of violence and sexual assault,” Clarke wrote in his ruling. “The undisputed facts additionally show that ODOC has systemically failed to appropriately address this exposure.”

reduxx

German swimming pool bans visitors who can’t speak German, citing safety concerns

Illustration Medforth AI

A public swimming pool in Germany has introduced strict new admission rules barring entry to anyone who cannot speak German, with management insisting the policy is essential to guarantee the safety of guests.

The Heidebad natural swimming pool in Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, now requires visitors to demonstrate German language skills before being allowed in. Managing Director Mathias Nobel defended the rule publicly, explaining that he is responsible for the safety of thousands of swimmers and will not compromise when it comes to protecting children and families.

The facility says that emergency alerts, water-depth warnings, and direct verbal instructions from lifeguards have repeatedly been ignored or misunderstood because of language barriers. In one recent emergency, Nobel, while acting as a lifeguard, had to pull a young child out of deep water due to a language barrier. To reduce these risks, staff will now deny entry to any guest if they determine that essential safety communication cannot be reliably established, according to German media outlet MDR.

Pool management acknowledges that the rule has triggered considerable backlash, but says the public dissatisfaction is being “deliberately accepted in the interest of general safety.”

From the operators’ perspective, dealing with angry patrons is preferable “than an avoidable swimming accident.” The policy is already being actively enforced, and several would-be guests have been turned away at the gate.

The Heidebad is part of a wider trend of European public pools tightening entry requirements in response to regional migration shifts. Last year, an outdoor pool in Porrentruy, located in the Swiss municipality of Pruntrut, initially banned foreigners entirely due to violence, sexual harassment and constant disturbances. Swiss visitors to the pool and employees were generally happy about the move.

The ban came about after ‘French youths with a migration background’ continuously caused problems at the pool and in pool bathrooms, including the sexual harassment of young girls. The situation even sparked international headlines.

However, the Swiss paper 20 Minuten reported a surge in season ticket sales after the ban was put in place.

“It went very well. Citizens have rediscovered the bathing establishment with the peace and quiet that comes with it,” said Lionel Maître, the municipal councilor for tourism and leisure in Porrentruy. “We have seen an increase in season ticket sales as citizens have finally regained the long-awaited sense of security. There have been no problems and no new bathing bans since then.”

The swimming pool has since changed its policy and now charges non-locals double ticket prices. The municipality has also added extra administrative steps for certain visitors. Anyone who is not a local resident and lacks a valid Swiss residence, work, or settlement permit must buy admission online in advance. Visitors without a recognized regional tourist card must also present valid identification at the entrance, and those who fail to do so are refused entry.

Mayor Philippe Eggertswyler publicly backed the new pricing and entry framework, stating that “It’s not about pitting Swiss and foreigners against each other, but about guaranteeing calm.”

The swimming pool may have backed down from its total ban on foreigners due to pressure from the federal government. The Federal Commission against Racism called the blanket exclusion “problematic and irritating.”

rmx

Brazilian Couple Sentenced to 50 Days in Jail for Homeschooling Without Gender Ideology

Audato and Ieda Denardi with their children
ADF International

A Brazilian couple has been sentenced to 50 days in jail for homeschooling their daughters according to their own beliefs and not introducing them to gender ideology. Audato and Ieda Denardi were convicted of “intellectual neglect” after a court concluded that the education they provided at home failed to include programs on “gender and sex education” and “tolerance and diversity.”

The girls, aged 15 and 11, have been educated at home since 2020. Despite the girls being accomplished pianists and speaking multiple languages, the court determined that their educational experience was insufficient in certain areas deemed important by the state. The judge also cited what he considered a lack of cultural exposure, pointing to the fact that the couple’s daughters did not enjoy listening to trap [a subgenre of hip-hop] or sertanejo music.

The couple decided to begin homeschooling in 2020 after becoming dissatisfied with the public education system during pandemic-era remote learning. Since making that decision, they say they have witnessed significant improvements in their daughters’ academic performance while also being able to incorporate their faith and personal values into their education.

“As a mother, I cannot conceive of a more dictatorial state than the one that wants me in jail because I chose to exercise my right to direct the education and upbringing of my daughters,” Ieda Denardi responded to the ruling.

The conviction came despite the prosecutor recommending that the parents be acquitted. After hearing testimony and examining the girls’ social and academic development, the prosecutor concluded that the children had not been neglected.

“The prosecutor examined the witnesses and recommended acquittal. An independent educational psychologist found no sign of neglect. The girls themselves described rigorous daily education,” Julio Pohl, Legal Counsel for Latin America at ADF International, criticized.

Nevertheless, the judge ruled against the family. In his decision, he accused the parents of “using their daughters as pawns in an ideological struggle,” arguing that they had subjected the girls to an educational model that operated outside state oversight and lacked established legal metrics within Brazil’s education system.

“A parent has been sentenced to prison not for failing to educate her children, but for educating them according to her own values. This is a grotesque abuse of the criminal law, and we will not let it stand,” said Pohl, representing the family in the case.

The sentence has been suspended, pending appeal.

Until now, homeschooling disputes had generally been treated as administrative matters related to school registration requirements. According to supporters of the family, the Denardis are the first parents in Brazil to receive a criminal conviction for homeschooling their children.

europeanconservative

UK: Labour candidate and youth worker among three brothers jailed for grooming abuse crimes

Amar Ilyas, 41, of Sheffield, was sentenced in his absence to 27 years in prison while Kamran Ilyas and Kamar Ilyas were sentenced to 3 and 10 years in prison, respectively | NCA

A Labour candidate and youth worker is among three brothers convicted of grooming gang offences in Sheffield, sentenced today after victims spoke of the devastation the men had caused.

Amar, Kamar and Kamran Ilyas had been convicted of child sex abuse offences against five victims.

Known as “Killer” to his victims, Amar Ilyas used a gun and threats of gang rape to coerce young girls into abuse.

Amar was meant to be jailed today alongside his younger brothers Kamran and Kamar, but he absconded before his trial last year.

He remains in Pakistan, where he has claimed to be receiving medical treatment and unable to return to Britain.

Today, Mr Justice Hampton said that Amar was “deliberately avoiding these proceedings for no other reason than cowardice”.

Amar was found guilty of 20 offences against five victims. The judge described Amar as a determined and predatory offender as he sentenced him to 27 years plus one year on an extended licence.

The judge sentenced him consecutively for one “particularly brutal” rape, which he said demanded the punishment.

He was said to have “humiliated” one victim in front of her friends after a rape. Another victim, who Amar knew had vulnerabilities, was secluded and threatened with having to perform a sex act on all of the men if she did not comply. “She must have been terrified,” said the judge.

Amar was also found guilty of raping a 13-year-old girl when she was asleep at a friend’s house. “She already knew you and your reputation, she feared you,” said Mr Justice Hampton.

Another one of Amar’s victims was procured for him by his brother Kamran.

Sheffield Crown Court heard that Amar had “already determined what was to happen to her” when he drove her out to the countryside.

The girl was told that his nickname was ‘killer’ before biting the girl and, despite her crying, continued to rape her.

Amar told the girl that she could not complain because she was Asian and that she would be disgraced due to her culture. “These comments have been proven to be incorrect,” said the judge.

His brothers were found guilty of five sexual offences against one of the girls, who was just 12 years old when Kamar met her.

Kamar was found guilty of rape of a child under 13 and sexual activity with a child when he was 17 to 20. He was jailed for 10 years, which he must serve two-thirds of until he is considered for parole.

The court heard that Kamar’s 12-year-old victim was particularly vulnerable. Kamar introduced the girl to Amar, “no doubt so that he could exploit [her] too”.

His brother Kamran was convicted of sexual activity with a child in 2004 when he was 17. He was jailed today for three years and must serve half his sentence behind bars.

Kamran also attacked the same young girl as his brothers, who he “humiliated … by commenting on her body.”

GB News can reveal today that after his grooming gang offending, Amar Ilyas became a Labour Party candidate and a youth worker.

He ran unsuccessfully for Labour in the City ward for Sheffield City Council in the 2016 elections.

In 2019, Ilyas, working as a taxi driver, was stabbed in the head by drug dealer Bassan Khan, who was later jailed for the attack.

The stabbing was part of a spate of violence that erupted in Sheffield, which included a shotgun being fired at the home of a local politician.

Ilyas was supported by activists from the Corbyn-backing Momentum group after the stabbing, who described him as a wonderful comrade in a fundraiser.

The taxi driver was working as an anti-knife crime campaigner for the charity Mums United.

There is no suggestion whatsoever that Mums United, the Labour Party, or Momentum were aware of or involved in any of Amar’s crimes.

He was a director at the charity until 2020, the same year he was arrested by the National Crime Agency for his sex abuse crimes.

GB News can also disclose that after identifying his role as a youth worker, the officers from the NCA made a safeguarding referral to the local authority as a precautionary measure.

Victim impact statements were heard in the court, as one victim said: “Unlike the attitude that has shown towards me, this is not about causing pain. This is about truth, accountability and justice.”

She continued: “Today marks the point at which I stop carrying the burden of silence and self-doubt.

“I’m taking back control of my life, my voice and my future. I will be heard and I will not be dismissed.”

Another victim, in statements delivered by a barrister, said that Amar had been driving by her house “in a sadistic way” ahead of the trial.

“I felt angry that the person who put me through this was able to walk around,” she said, adding “I know you just couldn’t face up to what you had done. The fact I struggled but you get to walk around free is ludicrous.”

She said “thank you” to Amar for “trying to intimidate me and my family” and for “walking around with a smug look on your face”.

“All of this strengthened my resolve to keep going.”

Closing proceedings, the judge referred to the first victim impact statement: “She and the other four have been heard and they have been believed.”

Kamar and Kamran were sent down to the cells but Amar remains a wanted man.

Mr Justice Hampton praised the bravery of the victims for giving evidence during the trial, adding that it was “a direct contrast to the defendants in attempting to avoid this case being tried.”

The judge said that Amar Ilyas had “taken the coward’s route and fled,” adding that every effort must be made to locate him and bring him to justice.

“When he is brought here, I will deal with him.”

gbnews