Ireland: Not a Welcoming Environment for Jews

The Irish Parliament, on the night of May 25, 2021, staged a “legal Kristallnacht” against the nation of Israel. Following an avalanche of vituperative anti-Israel and anti-Semitic diatribes by members of the Dáil Éireann (lower house of Parliament), its members voted unanimously to discuss a motion on whether or not Ireland should support BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) legislation to try to strangle Israel economically. Ostensibly, the BDS movement’s goal is to shift world opinion to declare that Jewish settlements in the historically-named areas of Judea and Samaria are supposedly illegal seizures of Palestinian Arab land. In truth, the principal and outspoken objective of Palestinian organizers of the BDS movement is the destruction of Israel.

Disturbingly, the May 25 motion was fully supported by at least two of Ireland’s leading NGOs sponsored by the Irish Catholic Church: Sadaka and Trócaire. Pro-BDS Sadaka, in particular, makes no pretense about being bitterly opposed to Israel. Even more shocking was that fully a third of Irish members of parliament of voted to expel Israeli diplomats from Ireland. Sein Fein (“Ourselves Alone”), a democratic socialist party and that won the most votes in Ireland’s 2020 parliamentary elections, has been spearheading the increasingly anti-Israel orientation of Ireland’s foreign policy.

Ireland, by virtue that it stands alone in its official state-to-state condemnatory initiatives against Israel’s policies “in the territories,” is, according to Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney, perceived as supposedly the most anti-Israeli state in the European Union. Other EU states may often be critical of Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians — for instance Sweden, Belgium, and Luxembourg. When Luxembourg’s Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn hosted a convocation of several EU states who were considering granting diplomatic recognition to a supposed “state of Palestine,” Sweden, Belgium, and Ireland were a few of the states that sent representatives to this meeting.

Unfortunately, there has been virtually no push-back from Ireland’s general public or civil society institutions. This lack of support for Israel is distressing, as much of the pro-Palestinian rhetoric and criticism of Israel is not only unjust but has been morphed into blatant anti-Semitism by some political and cultural Irish public figures. One legislator, Catherine Connolly, raised the anti-Semitic theme of “Jewish Supremacy” analogous to the world Jewish conspiracy trope found in the fraudulent Protocols of the Elders of Zion, an anti-Semitic document. The chairman of the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland, Maurice Cohen, pointed out that Connolly’s performance strayed into classical anti-Semitic language.

There is understandably some sympathetic sentiment among the Irish people for the plight of Palestinians, as there is also among Israelis, saddened to see people suffer unnecessarily under a brutal and corrupt Palestinian leadership, which has full autonomy over much the territory under dispute. The Palestinians long ago agreed, in the Oslo Accords of 1993, to settle those disputes by direct negotiation, not by external fiat. One Palestinian shopkeeper in Dublin suggests that there is a shared feeling with the Irish of having fought against colonialism and oppression. Yet there is little evidence that the bulk of the Irish citizenry support this prejudicial assault on Israel, much less, the poisonous anti-Jewish rhetoric.

All Israelis — about 20% of whom are Muslims, along with Christians and Druze — have identical rights under the law. Israeli Arabs can vote, have political parties and prominent job opportunities, and are members of Israel’s parliament. Confusion likely arises because the people known as Palestinians are not Israelis. They are Arabs who fled what is now Israel when armies of five Arab countries — Egypt, Syria, Trans-Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq — attacked Israel on May 15, 1948, the day the British Mandate over Palestine ended. These countries were hoping to destroy the new state of Israel in its crib. When, after Israel’s unexpected victory, the Arabs who had fled wished to return, they were refused as fifth-columnists: people who had shown sympathy or support for the enemy. The Arabs who had fled suddenly found themselves without a home, displaced. These are the people who later called themselves Palestinians. The Arabs who stayed in Israel during the war are full-fledged Israeli citizens, and have exactly the same rights and legal protection as Jews, although there is always room for improvement in everyone’s standard of living. The one exception is that Arabs are not required to serve in the Israeli military; in the event of possible conflicts with Arab states, Israelis did not want brother fighting brother. Many Israeli Arabs have nevertheless been voluntarily joining the military in record numbers, often despite harsh criticismfrom other Arabs.

In Ireland, Jew-hatred does not well up from the general public but seems clearly driven from the top down. These Goebbels-like attacks on Israel include salvos from several Sinn Fein members of parliament. One of them, Martin Browne, represents Tipperary and claims, falsely, that Israel created ISIS. Another, Matt Carthy representing Cavan-Monahan, has stated that Israel is the worst human rights offender on earth — presumably dwarfing China, North Korea, Venezuela and Iran.

Others include People Before Profit Party members Gino Kenny and Brid Smith, representing districts in Dublin, who have called for the expulsion from Ireland of Israel’s Ambassador. Leading Irish novelist Sally Rooney refused an offer by Israeli publisher Modan to translate her latest book into Hebrew, expressing support for the BDS movement.

The behind-the-scenes launch pad for much of this anti-Semitic rhetoric might be the outsized influence enjoyed by Ireland’s Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Islamic Cultural Centre (ICC) The ICC is the religious, political, and financial wellspring of Islam in Ireland. Another impetus for the appearance of Jew-hate in the Irish parliament is the full-time activism of pro-Palestinian propagandists on Ireland’s college campuses. This campus activism is spearheaded by Palestinian students who have granted scholarships to study in Ireland [1] These students and sympathetic teachers recruit Irish natives [2] to form chapters of the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) that operate on and off college grounds. The chairwoman of the IPSC is Fatin al Tamimi, a Palestinian who emigrated to Ireland three decades ago. There are IPSC chapters in most of Ireland’s large cities. Then there are the faculty-assisted Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapters on the campus of several universities. SJP university chapters are in Dublin’s Trinity College, the National University of Ireland (NUI) of Maynooth in County Kildare, and County Galway’s NUI chapter in Galway City,[3] all of which support the BDS movement, as does the Union of Students in Ireland.

There also exists an apparent tacit alliance of convenience between pro-Palestinian politicians, academics and Sinn Fein leftists with right wing, racist Holocaust deniers and proponents of anti-Semitic tropes such as Rothschild financial manipulators and Christ-killers.[4]

There are about 2,500 Jews in Ireland, with census reports indicating that from 2011 to 2016, the Jewish population rose by nearly 30%. Although the number of Irish Jews may be on the rise, the political influence of Irish Jewry is waning. The last elected Jew in Ireland the former Irish Attorney General Alan Shatter was drummed out of office in 2014 following the Irish media’s broadcast of unsubstantiated charges of political corruption against him. Although Shatter has been subsequently exonerated, his case lends evidence that anti-Semitism is alive and well in Ireland. The exhaustive examination of the just released report compiled by David Collier, entitled “Ireland Antisemitism Report,” details classic examples of widespread Jew-hatred among politicians, academics and Palestinian students on the grounds of several Irish universities.

Under the rubric of developing a “social justice” foreign policy profile for Ireland, some of Ireland’s anti-Israel critics may have helped ignite a vicious anti-Semitic campaign that is poisoning what was once a most welcoming Irish society for Jews.


[1] “Ireland Anti-Semitism Report” by David Collier. October 2021. P.54.
[2] Ibid. p. 54 and p.57.
[3] Ibid, p. 56,60, and 62
[4] Ibid. p.66.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18011/ireland-antisemitism

German health minister’s strange behaviour creates social media stir

The clownish German health minister has been attracting attention with his strange behavior again. Most recently it was at the federal press conference in Berlin.

Karl Lauterbach does not look very healthy, and especially his mental state is cause for concern. At the federal press conference on December 22, he appeared to suffer from a brief lapse. When a journalist asks him a question, he suddenly inexplicably slumps over.

RT-DE captured Lauterbach’s collapse.

Worrying data from Germany showing how vaccines do not work and rather contribute to disease, may be a reason for the government’s efforts to blame the Omicron variant for their own failure in foisting a faulty product on their population.

Despite good news from South Africa, Lauterbach continues to claim the Omicron virus variant “dwarfs everything that we have seen so far in the pandemic”. He has urgently called for the booster vaccinations to be accelerated while the Federal Government’s Expert Council has warned of the “collapse of the entire critical infrastructure”.

But a study by South African’s largest private health insurer, Discovery Health, showed that the number of natural deaths is significantly lower than in previous waves.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/12/25/german-health-minister-strange-behaviour-creates-social-media-stir/

Syrian anti-Semite gave the German court the finger – Photo of crime scene of massacre of a Jewish family published on Facebook, calling the crime a festival of sacrifice

For posting a crime scene photo of the massacre of a Jewish family on Facebook, a refugee from Syria stood trial on Monday.

The Palestinian had added a red heart emoji and the words “blessed feast of sacrifice” in Arabic to the picture. As he left the courtroom, he cheekily gave the finger!

Tiergarten District Court. Defendant: Musaab A. A. (24). Born in Syria. School up to grade 11. Summer 2015: He came to Europe via the Western Balkans. July 31, 2015 Application for asylum in Germany. Residence until December 15, 2019, subsidiary protection.

Two records in the German criminal register. March 2019 one year and three months suspended prison sentence (dangerous bodily harm, coercion). December 2019 fine for an anti-Israel graffiti (damage to property, 225 euros).

The charge was read out by a senior prosecutor from the “Central Hate Crime Unit”. This was set up in September 2020 to “prosecute prejudice-motivated crimes more effectively”. The reason for this is that racism, anti-Semitism and other forms of group-related misanthropy are repeatedly motives for committing crimes.

“This not only harms those affected, but also leads to collective intimidation of minorities in the public sphere,” the Berlin Attorney General’s Office states.

The accusation against the Syrian refugee: he had publicly advocated murder. On July 21, 2017, he posted a photo on his Facebook account of the massacre of a Jewish settler family in the West Bank (three dead, one seriously injured). The perpetrator – a Palestinian – was later sentenced to four terms of life imprisonment.

When investigations against the accused were underway in the summer of 2019, his mobile phone was seized. In it, the CID officers found the now incriminated Facebook entry from 2017.

The accused remains silent. His defence lawyer demands acquittal.

The judge sentences him for approving criminal offences and disturbing the public peace. The penalty: a warning! “The photo shows a blood-flooded kitchen room with a shoe,” says the judge. “People have been slaughtered there. Anyone who calls this a festival of sacrifice is mocking the victims.”

The warning is given under juvenile criminal law because the accused was 20 years and three months old at the time of the crime and not yet of age.

https://www.bz-berlin.de/tatort/menschen-vor-gericht/judenhasser-zeigte-im-gericht-den-stinkefinger

Up to 30,000 cases of myocarditis among 18-29 year old men after COVID-19 gene therapy in Germany

The Paul Ehrlich Institute’s (PEI) safety report is an outrage. The report does not meet any of the criteria that must be applied to a report by an institute that is supposed to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines / gene therapies.

The great trivialisation already starts with the title of the report: “Suspected cases of side effects…”. What are the people at the Paul Ehrlich Institute paid for, if all they are useful for is to produce a supposed safety report after months of work, in which only SUSPECTED CASES are shown? Is there no one at the Paul Ehrlich Institute who can pick up a phone to follow up suspicious cases? Is there no one who has mastered a basic technique of empirical social research, such as a snowball method, with which it would be easy to answer the question of how many of the suspicious cases have progressed beyond the state of suspicion and become certainty?

But that is exactly the problem.

Political actors and their henchmen have no interest in certainty about the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines / gene therapies for whose manufacturers they are acting as door-to-door salesmen. If there were the political will, it would be easy to achieve certainty about the side effects of vaccines / gene therapies, side effects such as myocarditis. Myocarditis is interesting in that the fact that Pfizer/Biontech and Moderna gene therapies cause heart muscle inflammation cannot be disputed. It is well known. All that remains for those who want to make COVID-19 vaccination/gene therapy the only path to eternal salvation against all risks is to discredit their own data, to downplay and trivialise the data, to leave it out of context, and all this can be found in the PEI report when you read the remarks on myocarditis.

It starts with these two tables compiling the number of reports of cases of myocarditis after vaccination:

If you read the PEI safety report from page 22 onwards, you will notice that it only describes what can be seen in the tables. There is no classification whatsoever. This is what was reported to the PEI. Be satisfied with that.

Stand-alone, monolithic descriptors that act as if the data being reported had fallen out of the blue and accordingly did not need to be placed in any context are an indication of concealment, that PEI staff want to shirk responsibility, an indication that turns into certainty [it does exist] a few pages further on. It states:

“The reporting rate of myo-/pericarditis is highest for Comirnaty in male adolescents and young men (18-29 years) after the second vaccination with 8.97 and 8.68 cases per 100,000 vaccine doses, respectively (imputation of missing dose data, see methodology for explanation). In comparison, the reporting rate for female adolescents and young women after Comirnaty in the same age group is significantly lower with 0.76 and 1.53 cases per 100,000 vaccine doses, respectively.

For Spikevax, the reporting rate was highest in young males (18-29 years) after the second dose, with 25.60 cases per 100,000 vaccinations. Because of the small number of cases (n=3), it was not meaningful to calculate the reporting rate for children and adolescents aged 12-17 years. For young women (18-29 years), the reporting rate of myo/pericarditis after second vaccination was 5.77 cases per 100,000 vaccine doses. No cases were reported in female adolescents after the first dose.”

This passage attempts to feign accuracy in order to cover up the fact that essential information is simply being suppressed here:

Where is the reporting rate for all other age groups?
Where is the reporting rate for the cases of myocarditis that occur after the first vaccination?
How can it be explained that the PEI data do not seem to reflect a solid result of previous research on side effects, according to which boys aged 12 to 17 have the highest risk of developing myocarditis as a result of gene therapy?
One of the studies that directly addresses the risk of children and adolescents aged 12-17 years is entitled “SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis”. Tracy Beth Høeg, Allison Krug, Josh Stevenson and John Mandrola produced it. For the study, the authors chose very narrow selection criteria for the diagnosis of “myocarditis” or “pericarditis”. The data come from the CDC’s VAERS database, which collects Vaccine Adverse Reactions. The cases of myocarditis or pericarditis resulting from vaccination recorded in this database are underreported. This is not a controversial finding. It has been known for years that databases collecting adverse reactions to drugs or vaccines record only a fraction of actual cases. Høeg et al. (2021) again find evidence in their data that the CDC database captures at best 40-50% of actual cases, but probably much less.
On the basis of the reported side effects of myocarditis and pericarditis, the determination of which the authors, as already mentioned, define very narrowly and validate via other complaints, Høeg et al. (2021) calculate the ratio of benefits to risks of COVID vaccination for healthy boys aged 12 to 15 years and 16 to 17 years.

The results are such that you want to beat all the political buffoons who are rushing across the nation spreading their vaccination propaganda like the Pied Piper of Hamelin:

  • Healthy boys aged 12 to 15 years are 3.7 times more likely to develop myocarditis or pericarditis than COVID-19.
  • Healthy boys aged 16-17 years are 2.1 times more likely to develop myocarditis or pericarditis than COVID-19.
  • Healthy boys aged 12 to 15 years have a 4.3-fold to 22.8-fold higher risk of being hospitalised for myocarditis or pericarditis than for COVID-19.
  • Healthy boys aged 16-17 years have a 2.5 to 13.2-fold higher risk of being hospitalised for myocarditis or pericarditis than for COVID-19.

In fact, there is evidence that children and adolescents in Germany also contract myocarditis after vaccination, in large numbers in the first table, Table 6 of the PEI safety report. Myocarditis after gene therapy from Pfizer and Biontech is reported for 82 boys between the ages of 12 and 17. These 82 boys are omitted from the rest of the report. Instead, there is the note: “Due to the small number of cases (n=3), a calculation of the reporting rate for 12-17 year old children and adolescents was not meaningful” This note refers to Spikevax by Moderna, so one must conclude that the corresponding calculation for Comirnaty was possible but not desired, so it was omitted.

The indications that the PEI’s “safety report” is a cover-up report are so numerous that one cannot come to any other conclusion than that the true extent of considerable side effects, which primarily affect boys and young men aged 12 to 29, is being deliberately concealed here. Last but not least, the fact that the report pretends that the reports on which it is based are the universe of all myocarditis cases that have occurred after vaccination is a clear indication of this intention to conceal.

We have cited a paper in this text that shows that adverse events following drug treatment are notoriously underreported. The extent to which estimates of how many of the cases that actually occurred are reported varies from 5% to 50%. The only consensus is that at least 50%, and probably many more, of the adverse events that do occur are NOT reported.

Against this background, we have extrapolated the data of the PEI report to get an idea of what the reporting rate of 25.6 mentioned in the PEI report actually means. The fact that this reporting rate is simply passed on to the readers is another indication that the PEI report is trying to obfuscate and deceive, because if you don’t know what to make of the statement that the “reporting rate in young men … was highest after the second dose with 25.60 cases per 100,000 vaccinations” with Spikevax, then you have to deal with that. The PEI is only interested in placing a small number “25.6” next to a large number “100,000” in order to give the impression that the risks are few, isolated and very rare. Chapter 6 is entitled “Very rare risks of COVID-19 vaccines”. It is therefore already clear before data collection that the risks are “very rare”. Why should a researcher who wants to know whether certain side effects are frequent or rare classify these side effects as “very rare side effects” even before he has dealt with their frequency – if not for reasons of ideological cosmetics?

How common is myocarditis among young men who have not been vaccinated? An important comparison criterion, without which it is not possible to assign any meaning to the 25.6 per 100,000 SpikeVax vaccinated. The important data is missing from the PEI report. It is suppressed. Why?

And so we could go on listing what distinguishes this report, which is everything but a safety report.
However, we think it is more useful to give our readers an idea of the incidence of myocarditis among young men aged 18 to 29. To do this, we have taken two approaches. One based on the number of cases given in the two tables above for these young men, and one based on the reporting rates calculated in the PEI report for this age group of young men, however that may be.

Both numbers form the starting point that we have used to extrapolate the number of actual cases of myocarditis for different reporting rates, i.e. different unreported cases, on the basis of the approximately 6,000,000 young men who fall into this age group [data from the Federal Statistical Office] and taking into account the proportions for Comirnaty and Spikevax, which have a ratio of 4.9 : 1 to each other. The result can be seen in the following figure, it is a result that would prompt a responsible politician to stop the vaccination mania, and suspend the vaccination of young men until it is clarified how many thousands of victims the vaccination mania has already claimed in this age group. Victims who, for the most part, would not have been in any danger from COVID-19.Young men made sick because political actors want to feel important for once and have no problem risking the health of thousands.

https://sciencefiles.org/2021/12/24/menschenopfer-bis-zu-30-000-faelle-von-myokarditis-unter-18-29jaehrigen-maennern-nach-covid-19-gentherapie-in-deutschland-hochrechnung-pei-sicherheitsbericht/

France: Armed man making threats outside a church is arrested

The crime occurred against a background of extra vigilance in the face of the threat of terrorist attacks. On Thursday December the 23rd, a man was arrested in front of the Sainte-Agnès church in Maisons-Alfort, as reported by Le Parisien. He was armed with a cutter knife and allegedly made threatening remarks. According to initial reports, it was around 2 p.m. when the man appeared in front of the building, which was almost empty as no services were being held there.

He was dressed in a long black coat with a hood, from which wires and “a device that looked like a detonation system hidden in a glove” protruded, as a police officer told Le Parisien newspaper. The law enforcement officers who were dispatched were able to arrest the suspect without anyone being hurt. The church was evacuated and a team of explosives experts, including an explosives detection dog, was deployed to remove all doubt. No explosive devices were reportedly found at the scene or on the author of the threats, who has not been identified even hours after his arrest. The newspaper Le Parisien reported that the 40-year-old was “wearing a whole series of amulets and may not have been sane”.

Religious sites, especially churches, are under increased surveillance during the Christmas season. At the end of November, two men had been arrested by the DGSI for planning attacks during the holidays. On Monday December the 20th, the cathedral in Toulouse also had to be evacuated because of the suspicious behaviour of one person.

France: A woman gets out of her car, starts praying in the middle of the street and shouts “Allahu Akbar” when the police arrive

The incident caused panic in the La Gineste neighbourhood of Marseille on Wednesday December the 22nd.
A woman travelling in a Nissan stopped her car in the middle of the road, got out and started praying in the street.

When other road users asked her to stop, the young woman got back into her car and made dangerous driving and evasive manoeuvres. Witnesses saw her holding a Qur’ an and she was reportedly shouting Allahu Akbar when the police arrived,” the same source of information said.

The lead of a mentally disturbed person is probably favoured.

https://www.fdesouche.com/2021/12/24/marseille-une-femme-descend-de-sa-voiture-se-met-a-prier-en-plein-milieu-de-la-route-et-crie-allahu-akbar-a-larrivee-des-policiers/