European nations do not have a good history when it comes to dealing with their Jews.
That should be on our minds as we watch Europeans join other Islamists and their leftist allies in marches calling for the destruction of the State of Israel, such as the one in London last week.
With respect to Jews in Europe, what were Europeans thinking when they opened their borders to inadequately vetted Jew-hating Islamist immigrants – who come from rabidly anti-Semitic nations, to spread their culture and Sharia Law rather than adopt western values.
With respect to Jews in Israel, the Europeans have this idea that it is in order for them to support Hamas whose very Charter supports the murder of all Jews in a religious war. And in view of the barbarism of terrorist Arabs, how can Europeans still tell Israel that it should carve out from its historic homeland of Judea and Samaria (that its enemies call the “West Bank”) some sort of Islamist terror state, when the Palestinian Authority also loves to kill Jewish civilians.
The Europeans were in favour of Israel in 2005 turning Gaza over to the so-called Palestinians. How did that work out as those Palestinian Rabbis rivalled the Nazis in their barbarism? The Islamists, including the Palestinian Authority (sic), make it quite clear that the only reason they would take a state in Judea and Samaria would be to use it to launch attacks to get what they really want, which is to get rid of the Jews who they see as occupying all of the land that was once ruled by Muslims and therefore must return to Muslim rule.
And now we see students and others around the world shouting genocidal comments showing they quite agree.
I am so sick of this nonsense, I decided that Germany and other Europeans should get a dose of their own medicine when it comes to reconciling Islamist values with the traditional European values. How would Europe like to have terrorist states created to serve radical Islamists in their midsts?
I have a special interest in Germany. My father was slave labor in Auschwitz concentration camp and his parents and then 8 year old sister were murdered in the gas chambers. My family name indicates that my ancestors lived in Germany for some time.
We shall see, below, that there may be some room for optimism in the way in which the German government has reacted to the current war and antisemitism, the German people seem to mimic the worst we now see among leftists and Islamists.
I have written about German incompetence when Israeli athletes were killed at the 1972 Olympic Games at Munich and more incompetence in the face of terrorism in Munich in 2016.
I concluded that “the reason for the incompetence is the foolish ideology adopted by the children and grandchildren of Nazi murderers that the problem of terrorism was a deserved problem of the Israeli Jews and that it wasn’t their problem.”
I have also written about the insensitive decision by Volkswagen to name a SUV the “Toureg” after the slave-trading Muslims active in Islamist actions in Mali with the idea that naming a vehicle after these camel-riders from the Sahara would help sell cars.
And more recently I have written about Germany’s moral choice to join the European Union’s anti-Israel statements and actions:
I don’t have a crystal ball that tells me where all this is going. On the one hand there is something very positive about some pro-Israel anti-Hamas statements and actions from German politicians; however, I think that we owe our children an attempt to see what kind of future might be established in Germany and other European nations if the Leftists and the Islamist predominate. In this essay I shall concentrate on Germany. If we have learned anything from history, it is that German problems don’t stay in Germany but seem to emanate to the wider world. And so, I ask a lot of questions as food for thought. Please don’t think me rude for asking questions that might make you feel uncomfortable.
-Can you imagine what would happen if Germany’s Muslim population grew, through demographics and immigration to amount to about 15% of the population up from its present 6%?
-Can you imagine what would happen if Islamists undertook a major campaign to have Sharia Law and Islamist culture against Christians, Jews, women, LGBTQ, and children, be part of a separatist movement for a two state solution within present-day Germany?
-Can you imagine if Iran (with its terrorist proxies) and other terror-sponsoring and Muslim Brotherhood groups backed this movement by undertaking serious terrorism including chemical weapons and missile attacks aimed at German civilians?
-Can you imagine that NATO folds under threats from Russia and internal divisions over Turkey’s membership?
Can you imagine that Western nations may come to the brink of civil war, as conservatives resist what I call the “Leftist-Islamist-Globalist alliance” adopted by leftist parties all over Europe and even in the United States – where Democrats have moved very leftward in their reaction to Trump’s election.
-Can you then imagine that other countries around the world might begin to support growing Islamist demands to accommodate Sharia Law by means of a separate country, a “two state” solution to the Islamist terrorism? Would it seem reasonable for the more Muslim and tolerant former West Germany to agree to become the Muslim State with the former East Germany adamant about being the non-Muslim state?
How could France or Sweden deprecate such an arrangement when they have allowed “no go” zones to operate in a way that approaches a separatist Islamist sovereignty?
-Can you imagine what would happen if Germany refused the Islamist demands and the United Nations, dominated by the Organization for Islamic Co-operation, became obsessed with Germany’s failure to give the Islamists what they wanted in the former West Germany?
-How would Germany feel if other countries began to support the Islamist state in Germany and support numerous non-governmental pro-Islamist, pro-separation organizations?
Prejudice against Muslims is now deeply rooted in Germany with one-in-two Germans considering Islam a valid threat, according to research by the Bertelsmann Foundation which found deficits in religious tolerance in the country, with Islam in particular being perceived negatively by many. Reported in Daily Sabah (Istanbul, July 18, 2019):
“Dogmatic, rigid beliefs and intolerance toward other religions could be detrimental to democracy in the long term,” the study said.
The Bertelsmann Foundation regularly examines the significance of religion for social cohesion via representative opinion polls in the “Religion Monitor” report. The report suggested that this negative perception toward the Muslim community has “consistently taken root” over a couple of years and that the prejudice is stronger in the eastern region, where far fewer Muslims live. The rate of those who perceive Islam as a threat is a staggering 57 percent in eastern Germany, whereas this number drops to 50 percent in the west of the country. Some 30 percent of those in the east went as far as to say they did not want a Muslim for a neighbor, as opposed to 16 percent in the west.
-Can you then imagine if the more “intolerant East” forced its smaller Muslim population to move to the more tolerant West, and the tolerant West was accepting of this?
And what if the Muslim population through demographics and family re-unification (especially among the one million predominately young single Syrian men who migrated pursuant to Merkel’s open-door policy and are ready to produce 4 or 6 children each) increases to about 30% of the population of the West, with these Muslims being given special privileges to compensate for illiberal actions in the East.
And what if the United Nations and a significant number of other countries backed a two-state solution for a Muslim Islamist state in the West and a non-Muslim state in the East? And what if the position of the elites of all Western nations was that the Muslim state in the West was deserved because of the history of Islamophobia and prejudice and loss of human rights of Muslims by nativist xenophobic Germans?
Can you imagine that the West of Germany abandons any pretense of a “special relationship” with Israel based on the historic wrongs of Nazi Germany to the Jewish people, freeing it to emulate other European nations to adopt a blatantly pro-Arab, anti-Israel set of policies. Can you imagine the East Part of Germany finding a better fit with eastern European nations like Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia who restrict Islamic immigration and oppose the Leftist-Islamist-Globalist alliance?
-Can you imagine that the non-Muslim East decides to withdraw from the EU in a “Germexit” movement instigated by the increasing Islamification in other European nations? And that West Germany with the backing of Turkey, joins the Organization of Islamic Co-operation leading within a few years, after the secession of Italy from the EU, towards a merger of the OIC and the EU?
And if you don’t see that, can you understand that others do?
And how could Germany insist that Israel allow a two-state solution, where one state is compromised of Islamists, when Germany itself might be faced with a decision to create a two-state solution for its growing Muslim population with its own cultural and religious values?
Is there room for optimism? Might the points made in this essay be eclipsed with a new realism about Hamas and other Islamist terror groups once Israel defeats and destroys Hamas in the present war?
Pamela Geller has written: “As international support for Israel collapses and condemnations against her continue to escalate, Germany unequivocally declaring its ‘historical responsibility to Israel’ was unexpected.
“Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck’s speech on Israel is a lesson in moral clarity with no equivocation. He puts other world leaders to shame and makes Biden look even more pathetic and broken than he already is.”
Geller did find “one caveat” to support for his remarks. She opposed the tendency, heard again in his remarks, to separate the Palestinian Arabs from their elected Hamas government – where few if any speak out against the barbarism and the horrible antisemitism contained in the Hamas Charter.
Geller rightly points out: “They voted for Hamas. I don’t recall the German people being separated from the Nazi party during WWII or the British people separated from Churchill’s government.”
The Germans like so many Europeans made mass protests in favour of Hamas; however, for those of us looking for something, anything, positive we must appreciate Habeck’s words, and the banning in Germany of such organizations as the antisemitic Samidoun and others seen as “front” groups for Hamas.
Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said: “With Hamas, I have today completely banned the activities of a terrorist organization whose aim is to destroy the state of Israel… There is no place for antisemitism in Germany, and we will fight it with all our might.”
Of course, we would like to see Germany join Nordic European nations Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden who have recently announced a new agreement that they were to combine their efforts on removing migrants, saying they would launch joint deportation flights and other initiatives. We hope that the masochistic admission to European nations of inadequately vetted Muslims who either tolerate or support radical Islamism has gone as far as it can. I have explained the western submission to Islamism in my book, The Ideological Path to Submission … and what we can do about it.
Is there a change afoot or will a two-state Germany and other European nations prove a real possibility?