French archdiocese cancels DJ priest appearance at St. Joan of Arc Festival after backlash

Father Guilherme Peixoto. Wikimedia Commons, Nuță Lucian, CC-BY-SA-4.0

The Archdiocese of Rouen cancelled a scheduled performance by a well-known Portuguese DJ priest at its Joan of Arc celebrations amid mounting criticism.

On April 30, organizers of the annual Joan of Arc festivities in Rouen, France, confirmed that Father Guilherme Peixoto, a Portuguese Catholic priest known for electronic music performances, would no longer appear at the event on May 14 after a period of escalating criticism regarding the appropriateness of his participation.

Officially, the priest requested a postponement, but the decision occurred amid sustained objections to the program.

The announcement represents a reversal of earlier plans that had presented Peixoto as one of the principal attractions of the celebrations pretending to honor Saint Joan of Arc. His withdrawal was confirmed without detailed explanation from diocesan authorities, leaving the precise reasons formally unspecified.

To replace him, organizers have arranged for a French DJ known as Charles B to perform, with an additional local artist scheduled as an opening act. However, they are not Catholic priests and their performances will be held without claiming any religious aura. Furthermore, the new musical events have been relegated to the profane dimension of the festivities.

The controversy surrounding Father Peixoto’s inclusion had developed over several weeks. Critics questioned the coherence between the religious and historical significance of St. Joan of Arc celebrations and the staging of an electronic music performance led by a priest with a public image rooted in entertainment. The objections focused not on logistical concerns but on the perceived incongruity between the nature of the event and the format of the performance.

St. Joan of Arc is widely associated with themes of piety, sacrifice, and fidelity, and the commemorations in Rouen traditionally reflect these dimensions. The introduction of a techno concert format into this context was therefore seen by some observers as a departure from established expectations.

In the absence of a detailed official statement, interpretations of the cancellation remain limited to observable circumstances. The timing of the decision after public objections suggests that the organizers were responsive to the controversy.

Father Peixoto, who gained international attention after his controversial participation in World Youth Day 2023, has recently become the focus of a new controversy in Argentina.

On April 18, marking one year since the death of Pope Francis, the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires organized a large techno music event with the priest’s participation. The initiative prompted a reaction from a group of young Argentine Catholics, who addressed a public letter to controversial Archbishop Jorge García Cuerva, condemning the event as a “dishonorable spectacle” and a “grave scandal.”

lifesitenews

Halal restaurant in France slammed for dedicated women’s area shut down over dozens of health violations

The Seven Times restaurant in Vaulx-en-Velin has been shut down by the local prefecture, pending the fulfillment of no less than 39 corrective measures for serious breaches of local hygiene rules. But this isn’t the first controversy for Lyon’s “largest halal-certified food court.”

Last December, Seven Times launched an all-girls room, which was finally ended over outcries of discrimination. The restaurant insisted that the “100% girls” area had zero link to Islam. But locals weren’t buying it.

National Rally (RN) deputy Jérôme Buisson at the time denounced the move as “unacceptable and illegal separatism” in a post sharing a TikTok video from the restaurant’s channel that clearly indicates only women may go to the girls-only room (seemingly in the back and completely shut away), while the rest of the restaurant, out in the open, is reserved for men. The man in the video is clearly pleased with the space provided for men, seemingly referencing some sort of cultural norm that this is appropriate.

Unfortunately, this is France, and people responded accordingly.

French law also stipulates that any establishment open to the public, such as a restaurant, cannot deny service or restrict access to specific areas based on sex.

For its part, the owner of Seven Times told Le Figaro, “It’s 20 square meters out of 400 where women can gather to celebrate birthdays or graduations. We’re very far from communalism; everyone comes as they are and sits wherever they want.” At the time, the owner also considered filing a complaint against Buisson.

As seen in the video posted by Fdesouche, the restaurant also has a prayer room and indicates that families may also gather for celebrations in the larger open area. They did, however, eventually backtrack on the dedicated room for women, reportedly removing the large sign denoting the “100-girls” area. Now, Seven Times has new legal issues.

During a visit by agents from the Departmental Directorate for Population Protection (DDPP) on Monday, April 20, 2026, several deficiencies were noted at the restaurant, reported Le Progrés. Violations included the presence of dead flying pests, the risk of unsanitary conditions due to chemical contamination, inadequate maintenance and cleaning of the premises, and poor storage and preservation conditions for raw materials.

Shockingly, the portal also discovered that one of the managers also owned another restaurant in Villefranche-sur-Saône, the Naan Factory, that was also shuttered in April over hygiene and food safety regulation violations. Fines were also imposed in this case due to the presence of three undeclared employees, two of whom were also undocumented.

rmx

Anti-whites bar in Berlin received €662,000 subsidies

The non-profit company has been running a co-working space with an integrated café at Dresdener Straße 11 in Berlin for several years. Dresdener Str. 11 – Google Maps

A Berlin café and “intersectional” co-working space that explicitly bars white people from entry has received more than €662,000 in German taxpayer subsidies from the federal Demokratie leben! (Live Democracy!) programme, sparking outrage over state-funded racial exclusion in the heart of the German capital.

The BIWOC Rising project in Kreuzberg operates as a “safer space” open only to “BIWoC and TIN*BIPoC” individuals — Black, Indigenous, Women of Colour and Trans, Inter, Non-Binary, BIPoC persons, as its own website explains.

White visitors are systematically excluded under the organisation’s own rules.

Despite this explicit racial gatekeeping, the non-profit has drawn substantial public funding over several years for what it describes as anti-discrimination and empowerment work.

The project has been funded since 2021 for that.

According to some, the total amount of subsidies may be substantially higher for related projects on refugees and asylum seekers.

Alternative for Germany (AfD) party co-leader Alice Weidel highlighted the case on social media, questioning how German authorities can justify subsidising racial segregation with public money.

The story, first prominently covered by Focus and Apollo News, quickly spread across alternative and mainstream platforms, prompting accusations of hypocrisy in a country that prides itself on strict anti-discrimination laws.

Critics argue the funding exposes a glaring double standard: While “no whites allowed” policies are tolerated — and even financed — under the banner of diversity and decolonisation, any equivalent exclusion based on other criteria would face immediate legal and political condemnation.

According to newspaper Die Welt, BIWOC Rising Managing Director Loubna Messaoudi posted on anniversary of the October 7 terrorist attack in Israel on social media, downplaying the incident as a “resistance to colonialism”.

The actress Mihaela Dragan, who is a member of the advisory board of the organisation, also delivered forthright anti-Israeli statements.

In light of the recent revelations, Federal Minister for Education, Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Karin Prien (CDU), haas now announced a “thorough review” and realignment of the Live Democracy! programme.

“Whoever draws public funds must stand firmly on the ground of the democratic basic order. Hatred and incitement have lost nothing here,” she said.

Prien added that she wants more attention paid to “loyalty to national goals” and efficiency.

Live Democracy! now has more than  200 projects set to lose funding by the end of 2026.

Berlin’s left-leaning cultural and integration scene has long championed such “exclusive safe spaces” for marginalised groups, claiming they provide necessary protection from structural racism.

brusselssignal

UK: Muslim Labour mayor who helped son conceal evidence of raping 15-year-old girl jailed

Diwan Khan was sentenced to 12 years in prison with an extended licence period of five years | HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT CONSTABULARY

An ex-Labour mayor has been jailed after she helped her adult son conceal evidence of him raping a 15-year-old girl.

Naheed Ejaz, 61, was sentenced to three years in prison at Winchester Crown Court for perverting the course of justice.

Naheed Ejaz was sentenced for three years for perverting the course of justice | HAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT CONSTABULARY

The former town mayor for Bracknell Forest in Berkshire refused to allow officers into her home for more than a minute and a half while speaking Urdu to her son, Diwan Khan, 41, to allow him to hide his phone.

During a six-day trial, prosecutor Ed Wylde said Ejaz and Khan used the word “big bell” to refer to his phone.

Ejaz “chose to protect” her son, despite knowing his victim was an underage girl, Ejaz was told in court.

The judge added that there was a “real risk” Khan could have “avoided prosecution for the rape of an unconscious child”.

She served as mayor between 2023 and 2024 and stepped down as councillor in September 2024.

He admitted to perverting the course of justice in relation to hiding his phone

For the rape was sentenced to 12 years in prison with an extended licence period of five years upon release.

Khan raped the teenager after she “blacked out” from MDMA he put in vodka for her to drink.

The girl woke up in the backseat of Khan’s car without any clothes on and could not remember what happened.

Khan then showed a video he filmed of him raping, choking, and slapping the girl in the face, the court heard.

He threatened the girl after the attack, telling her he would “slit her throat” if she told anyone, and that she “belonged” to him.

He also threatened to show the video to the girl’s mother is she said anything about the accident.

The court heard how the young girl failed her GCSEs and attempted to kill herself following the rape.

Sentencing Ejaz, Judge Rufus Taylor said: “You, Naheed Ejaz, may not have known initially why he wanted you to hide [the phone], but your son told you in Urdu, ‘Some motherf***er girl has lied about her age to me’ and you chose to protect him.”

Judge Taylor accepted Ejaz made a spontaneous decision and noted a character witness who had described her as an “advocate for women’s rights”.

Bracknell Forest Council’s current Labour leader Helen Purnell thanked the victim for her courage in speaking out and said it was “right” that both Ejaz and Khan were behind bars.

She added: “Abuse against women and girls has no place in Bracknell Forest. I have put forward amendments to our domestic violence strategy to make sure more people in public roles are trained to intervene when they see unacceptable behaviours towards women in public.

“I have also launched an investigation into how Ejaz and Kahn were given taxi licenses, so that the public can have the full answers it deserves.”

In a victim impact statement to the court, the young girl said: “My mental health has been all over the place due to flashbacks, not being able to sleep.

“In June 2025 I tried to commit suicide and ended up in hospital. I just wanted to end my life so the pain would go away.”

Khan will serve eight years in prison before a parole board can consider his release.

He was also given a three-year concurrent sentence for perverting the course of justice, and is sexual harm prevention order of 20 years, and an indefinite restraining order against the girl.

gbnews

Norway: Migrant rapist gets a trivial 6-month sentence because he’s too ‘low-IQ’

Medforth AI

A 21-year-old migrant rapist, who assaulted and violated a 13-year-old girl, has just been given extreme leniency in Norway because the court has found him too stupid to be held accountable as a rapist should—he’s been sentenced to just six months in jail, and I have to wonder if he’ll get out early.

According to an article at Remix News, Syrian man Abdelmonem Abdelrazak Al-Yousef, who doesn’t speak any Norwegian, tried to deny that he ever met the girl, but the cops found his semen all over the asphalt of the bicycle parking area where the assault occurred, and spotted him on surveillance video. My kids have a phrase for situations like this: “caught in 4K.”

Naturally, the court rejected Al-Yousef’s defense, “noting it was entirely lacking in credibility”—DNA evidence and video footage tend to be conclusive! But, after forensic psychiatric experts evaluated Al-Yousef, they concluded that “he had a mild intellectual disability,” determining his IQ to be somewhere between 41and 75—which is typical for third world populations. So the judgment against Al-Yousef considered that “mitigating factor,” and decided that he really shouldn’t spend that much time behind bars. Too stupid to be punished, but smart enough to game the system.

The idea that people are too stupid to face the consequences of their own actions and therefore deserve to be catered to unfairly needs to be abolished. We can’t keep doing this. It’s endless, and the most grotesque miscarriages of justice I’ve ever seen.

Consider that there’s been an indefinite pause in the trial for Iryna Zarutska’s killer, until his mental capacity is “restored”:

Or, look at this:

These individuals are stupid to know that rape is wrong, or murder is wrong, but let me guess, they’re not too stupid to be out on our streets and in our neighborhoods, or vote and participate politically? Let’s not forget that’s the position actually held by your average leftist.

americanthinker