When Israel defends itself, the West wakes up, when Muslims massacre, the West sleeps….

AI generator

by Giulio Meotti

In the city of Al-Fashir, Sudan, innocent civilians have been killed in such numbers that blood is visible in satellite images.

A video comes from a hospital: dozens upon dozens of civilian corpses, inside and out, and the few survivors who are gasping and have now been executed.

Entire neighborhoods leveled, villages erased, and tens of thousands of people dead-by bullets or by hunger in the desert. The Islamist militias have turned civil war into a theater of extermination.

In Al-Fashir, Christians have been “hunted down and executed,” explains the NGO International Christian Concern.

“They came into our village shouting against Christians, calling us ‘infidels.’ They set fire to the church, and the flames spread, devouring everything they touched. They dragged the men out of their homes, massacring and beheading them. I could hear their screams, but there was no time to think. We had to flee. We left everything behind,” said a survivor.

Yet the moral noise of the West has fallen strangely silent.

No humanitarian corridor. No leaflet warning innocents to flee. No delivery of aid. No Greta. No flotilla. No special rapporteur. No vigils.

Videos show massacres with shouts of “Allahu Akbar.” But no one broadcasts them.

We have reached the point where a fake genocide has smothered our sympathy for a real one.

No major demonstration in New York, no banner from city halls, no “anti-colonialist” scholars from Bologna, no cry from peace activists marching in Assisi-not even the hollow echo of digital hashtags.

Silence of governments. Silence of NGOs. No one wants to march for Khartoum or wear a shirt saying “I am Darfur.”

No one shows the living mass graves. This is not a movie; it’s real.

Surely part of this has to do with the fact that dictatorships are now capable of manipulating Western consciousness.

Just read the new report on how French institutions, media, left-wing parties, top universities, intellectuals, and student bodies have all become targets of Iranian interference.

“Iranian infiltration has acted like a poison, slowly seeping into society, drop by drop; now it spreads, exerts influence, and corrodes,” it reads.

But there is more.

Where are the calls to dismantle “Arab colonialism”?

Sudan’s agony does not fit the woke worldview.

There is no “white oppressor”. No “Jewish settlers”. The perpetrators are all Islamists, black and Arab, ideologically positioned to be the victims of the West.

As Sébastien Boussois writes in Le Journal du Dimanche, our “variable moral geometry” collapses, and progressivism retreats into silence.

Sudan is unbearable not because it is far away, black, or Islamic (Gaza is also far away, Arab, and Islamic), but because it is culturally useless.

The Palestinian Arab child and the Israeli soldier, the anti-colonial dictatorship and the Western democracy, the humanitarian tent and the guarded fence-all neatly arranged for the great performance.

When Israel defends itself, the West wakes up. When Arab-Muslim militias massacre, the West goes to sleep.

In the Islamic tunnels, in Gaza as in Baghdad, Jews die and are tortured without cameras.

The same was true for Vietnam: People took to the streets shouting “Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh,” certainly not for the boat people, the poor South Vietnamese fleeing by sea.

Thus, the massacre of Al-Fashir passes unnoticed.

Naturalized as a U.S. citizen eight years ago under the Trump administration, the new NY mayor Mamdani was born in Uganda. And yet it was not in Uganda or Iraq, Iran, Azerbaijan-or any Muslim country-that the family settled, but in America, which Mamdani father loves to remind us was founded on the genocide of Native Americans and the slavery of African Americans.

Liberal democracies in Muslim lands can be counted on one withered hand. In fact, there is only one liberal democracy in the entire Middle Eat: Israel, the very country the Mamdanis want to destroy.

And the same spiritual mechanism that justifies Islamic violence against Israeli Jews now renders it blind to Islamist atrocities in Africa.

Evil is recognized only when it speaks English or Hebrew; oppression only when it can be attributed to Europe, Israel, the Crusades, or British colonialism. Never to Arabic-speaking Jihad and Islam.

So they avert their woke gaze, because they cannot afford to see.

israelnationalnews.

Pakistani attacks group of Orthodox Jews in Milan, Italy

Screengrab youtube

Police arrested at Milan Central Station a 25-year-old Pakistani man with a criminal record for aggravated assault based on racial, ethnic, and religious discrimination after he allegedly attacked a group of Jewish American citizens waiting to board a train, sources said Monday night.
The Pakistani man allegedly violently attacked one of them and began kicking and punching one of them, eventually hitting him on the head with a blunt object. Railway police officers subdued him and arrested him. The 25-year-old American Orthodox Jew was struck in the head by a heavy ring the attacker was wearing, sources said.
The blow caused a lacerated wound to the head, they said.
The victim was taken to the hospital for treatment, but his injuries are not serious.
ansa

BBC staffer admits workers pressured to ‘apologise for being white and middle-class’ as bias crisis deepens

A former BBC employee says staff felt pressured to “apologise for being white and middle class”.

The ex-worker, who wished to remain anonymous, claimed they had not worked anywhere else before “where people went around apologising so much for who they were”.

They told The Telegraph: “Culturally, it also became a place where you felt you had to apologise for being white and middle class – you felt your privilege very keenly.

“I generally think that’s a good thing, we should all be more aware of how good we’ve had it, but there is a point where experience and authority should hold sway, regardless of whether it’s coming from someone white and middle class.”

GB News has contacted the broadcaster for comment.

The BBC is facing growing criticism after a leaked memo claimed the corporation had edited a speech by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama broadcast the week before last year’s US election.

The 19-page leaked report complied by Michael Prescott, former external advisor to the BBC’s editorial guidelines and standards committee (EGSC), claimed the broadcaster had spliced clips together from sections of the US president’s speech on January 6, 2021, to make it appear he told supporters he was going to walk to the US Capitol with them to “fight like hell”.

President Trump has threatened a $1billion [around £759,750,000] law suit against the corporation.

In a letter to the broadcaster, Mr Trump’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito, set out a number of demands including “a full and fair retraction” of the documentary and “any and all other false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading, and inflammatory statements about President Trump in as conspicuous a manner as they were originally published”, as well as an apology and compensation.

A BBC spokesman said: “We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

BBC chairman Samir Shah has apologised for an “error of judgment” over the editing in the documentary and two of the corporation’s most senior figures – chief executive of BBC News Deborah Turness and director-general Tim Davie – resigned from their positions on Sunday.

Nigel Farage revealed he spoke to President Trump about the BBC on Friday, telling a press conference in London yesterday: “He just said to me ‘is this how you treat your best ally’.

“Quite a powerful comment isn’t it. There has been too much going for too long.”

The Reform UK leader added that the broadcaster had been “institutionally biased for decades”.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman yesterday insisted the BBC is not corrupt nor institutionally biased.

He said: “On the question of is the BBC corrupt? No.

“The BBC has a vital role in an age of disinformation… where there’s a clear argument for a robust, impartial British news service to deliver, and that case is stronger than ever.”

It comes as the Government is set to begin a review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which sets out the corporation’s governance and public mission.

The review into the BBC’s licence fee model will look at alternative funding for the broadcaster’s operations for when its current charter period ends in December 2027.

gbnews

John Cleese cancels Israel shows, producers claim: He caved to BDS

Wikimedia Commons, ,John Cleese in Melrose High Street by Walter Baxter , CC-BY-SA-2.0

British comedian and actor John Cleese, known for his roles in the Monty Python themes and the British sitcom “Fawlty Towers”, has canceled his scheduled performances in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

The shows, organized by Alon Yurik Productions, were set to take place between November 26 and December 1, one in Jerusalem and three in Tel Aviv. All tickets had been sold out.

A statement released by Alon Yurik Productions on Monday said, “We deeply regret that John Cleese has succumbed to threats from BDS organizations, especially after all tickets to his performances had long been sold out. We will continue to give our all to bring the Israeli audience the finest shows and cultural events.”

“On that note, we invite you to an evening with Kevin Spacey, taking place next week at Hangar 11 in Tel Aviv – a phenomenal actor, two-time Oscar winner, known for his deep affection for Israel,” the statement added.

Cleese had previously postponed his visit from June to November due to the war with Iran. In recent days, he has been actively reposting anti-Israel content on his X account, including videos targeting Israel and its leadership.

Among the posts Cleese reposted were a video of actor Mandy Patinkin raging against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and another of actor Mark Ruffalo criticizing his Jewish friends.

Cleese, who performed in Israel several years ago and was not previously known for anti-Israel views, has not commented publicly on the cancellation beyond the production company’s statement.

israelnationalnews

UN Convenes Climate Conference in Brothels – Saving the planet is hard work

The Brazilian rainforest is so endangered that the latest UN climate conference will take place there. Along the way to saving the planet, a four lane highway had to be cut through tens of thousands of acres of protected and endangered rainforest. Endangered by its protectors.

(But the good news, according to the Brazilian government, is that it’s a “sustainable highway.)

And if that’s not enough, fleets of jets will soon descend on the Brazilian rainforest as an estimated 45,000 attendees will show up to party, socialize, conference, and listen to lectures about how this time the planet is really on the edge of destruction. Please pass the canapes.

COP30, as the conference is known, hasn’t saved the planet in 29 conferences, but maybe the 30th one will do the trick, at least if the delegates can find someplace to stay in the rainforest.

The Brazilian government is announcing that individual rooms are available for planet-savers from other countries for as high $600. Over the summer, the UN held ‘emergency talks’ not over saving the planet, but over the cost of hotel rooms to save the planet from $600 rooms.

‘Poorer’ African nations warned that they couldn’t afford the cost of the hotel rooms (but they can usually afford gold watches, elaborate palaces and private armies) and would not come unless the costs came down. With the fate of the planet at stake, UN negotiators held several ‘urgent’ meetings to discuss plans for lowering the costs of a hotel room to save the planet.

Unfortunately the only way to lower the costs of the planet-saving hotel rooms would be chopping down even more rainforest to build more hotel rooms. Sometimes you have to destroy the rainforest to save the rainforest, or destroy the rainforest to make it cheaper to host African delegates to discuss saving the rainforest from umm… the people destroying the rainforest.

By then it was too late to build new hotels, but two massive cruise ships were dispatched to the Brazilian rainforest to provide African delegates with cheap cabins to stay in. For the planet.

The MSC Seaview, a 1,000 foot cruise ship with 18 decks, massive pool, four-story glass-walled atrium, disco, theater and full-sized bowling alleys, and the Costa Diadema, that has a 4D theater, a spa across 4 decks and a crew of over 1,000, were dispatched to save the planet by hosting the African diplomats to discuss reducing emissions from things like cruise ships.

It would take the average person 100 years to produce as many ‘emissions’ as these cruise ships do in one hour. But sometimes you just have to pollute to stop polluting the planet.

These cabins on cruise ships going nowhere (an apt metaphor for both the UN and its serial climate conferences, currently up to 30 and counting) will be going for a mere $220.

While the Africans were appeased, the Europeans were still furious over the high price of hotel rooms and refused to book rooms at $600 a night. Not even for the sake of saving the planet.

The Brazilian government rushed to find cheaper motels and Airbnbs to save the conference and thus save the planet, and the Europeans relented, but cut back their delegations so that fewer diplomats will be coming to save the planet. And that might actually save the planet.

But since this is Brazil, for those truly passionate about saving the planet, many of the arrivals will have to make do with ‘love motels’ that in America are usually known as the sorts of places that charge by the hour.

As the New York Times described it, the ‘love motels’ are preparing “rooms that range from the sensual to the raunchy for a different kind of guest: diplomats and climate scientists, civil servants and environmental activists” and “taking out anything too erotic“ which suggests that they have no understanding of what diplomats and ‘civil servants’ actually do at conferences.

Diplomats and ‘climate scientists’ will be given the option of having the “erotic chair — a metal-and-leather contraption resembling a dentist’s chair that was bolted to the floor for safety” taken out. At another hotel, “an oversized framed picture of a person’s rear end” was taken down. The brothels are doing this in the hopes of charging foreigners as much as $650 a room.

There’s something undeniably fitting about using whorehouses to host UN conference attendees. For all the talk about saving the planet, these conferences are shakedown sessions at which nothing is done for the environment (which is invariably worse off after a mass of glorified tourists converges on some exotic out-of-the-way locale) and the only green is the kind that comes in wallets.

“I’m also listening to ‘Bitch Better Have My Money’ by Rihanna nonstop,” Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez, the vice chair for the implementation of the UN Climate Convention, told reporters at COP29 which was held in the oil-rich and otherwise bleak hinterlands of Baku.

Juan’s female dog in question was the Western world, and it’s tired of bringing the money to pay off third worlders, whether for expensive rooms in mildly redecorated brothels, for ‘climate offsets’ or for their ‘climate catastrophes’. Much of the talk at the COPs comes down to creating large funds with which to bribe Africa, Asia and Latin America into going along with the latest version of the Chicken Little hoax, from ice ages to global warming to climate change, that a bunch of special interests and their hired ‘scientists’ describe as the ‘climate consensus’.

Third world countries are too busy wiping out endangered species to care about the planet. The only reason they show up to these UN shindigs is to demand ‘compensation’ from the West. The compensation comes in the form of funds set up to help them deal with the supposed effects of ‘global warming’ and in the form of ‘climate offsets’ in which Western nations agree to ‘cut’ emissions, but in practice just pay third world countries to buy some of their non-emissions.

If this sounds confusing, imagine that UN Secretary General António Manuel de Oliveira Guterres has promised not to cheat on his wife, but he finds himself staying in a Brazilian ‘love motel’ at a mere $650 a night and decides to use one of the menus to avail himself of a local lady of the evening who is similarly disposed to reducing emissions and saving the planet.

But UN Secretary General António Manuel de Oliveira Guterres has taken a firm vow at COP29 to stop cheating on his wife. So he arranges for an ‘adultery’ offset in which he offers $220 to a local gentleman who is not cheating on his wife to offset his adultery. Guterres, now in possession of an ‘adultery offset certificate’ then commits adultery. And when Mrs. Guterres catches him in the act, shows her the certificate and explains that he’s not committing adultery, he’s actually reducing the total amount of planetary adultery by offsetting his adultery with the purchase of someone else’s unused adultery. And this is really a way to end adultery.

If this sounds like a complete immoral fraud, welcome to the business of saving the planet. You not only know more than all the ‘experts’, but you’re not paying $600 for a room in a brothel or paying $600 million in climate offsets to non-industrialized countries to buy their pollution.

Fortunately, President Trump is keeping American diplomats home and out of Brazil. That means we’ll save money on their hotel rooms/brothels and actually save the planet.

UN Convenes Climate Conference in Brothels | Frontpage Mag

GRAPHIC: Trailblazing ‘first trans’ lawmaker confesses to sex crimes against toddlers

Image from Grok.

By Olivia Murray

A “trans” individual who also commits sex crimes against children? How unoriginal. Barry Laughton, a New Hampshire Democrat who goes by “Stacie-Marie”, was the first “openly trans lawmaker” in the U.S., elected to office in 2012, making him a “trailblazing” icon for the LGBTQ crowd. Now, he’s facing 30 years in prison after admitting to sex crimes against toddlers. Here’s the story, from an item at the New York Post:

Four pictures of children believed to be 3 to 5 years old were sent to Laughton by former partner, Lindsay Groves, who took the horrific images in the bathroom of the daycare where she worked in Tyngsborough, Mass., federal prosecutors said.

Laughton — who was called a history-maker following their election to the New Hampshire House in 2012 — asked Groves to take the nauseating pictures and exchanged thousands of text messages about them, according to the feds.

The explicit images were taken between May and June 2022 at Creative Minds day care, where Groves worked in the small town close to Nashua, according to charging documents shared by the New Hampshire Union Leader.

Groves ‘used natural bathroom breaks for the children,’ to photograph the children, according to docs.

Take a look at this guy:

Ugly as sin, and scary as all hell.

As the Post reports, Laughton solicited the pictures from his girlfriend at the time, who snapped the images when she took literal babies to the bathroom while they were in daycare. Is there still any question why we don’t want these perverts in our private facilities? Whether it’s a space for boys or girls? It’s almost like “trans” freaks, and anyone sympathetic to them, shouldn’t be permitted to participate in society….

Minor-attracted pedophile? How about millstone-attached person? Think I’m being too extreme? Take a look at some of the text message exchanges, per the official criminal complaint from the Justice Department (GRAPHIC WARNING):

GROVES: I’m horny right now

LAUGHTON: I was asking because I know we’ve had some back-and-forth and I know we initially said we do nothing with kids ever again and you said you were afraid that if we had kids if they would go back and tell the parents the same with the kids you work with when I was trying to ask you do you seriously see no problem with sex with children like I had always wanted to put my dick inside one of the little girls you work with, but you said they were too little and then you said I could so I don’t know I know you’re horny I’m trying to get clean and I already have the hot water running baby.

GROVES: I want to do it with the kids at work

GROVES: than you can put your dick inside them

GROVES: I wasn’t being serious about the kids running back and telling their parents

GROVES: Plus I want to do it with kids who use to come here cause they can enjoy it

LAUGHTON: Well, I know but you were afraid that the kids at work might tell their parents and we said we would do it if we knew we were not gonna get caught and I was just wondering like like basically you have no problem with that…

And this:

LAUGHTON: So you would let me fuck the little girls that you work with

LAUGHTON: And you’re not screenshot Ing this and possibly use it against me at all like we’re both on the same page we both want to do this and he would let me put my dick inside those little girls I mean what if my dick is too big I mean its big but its not that big I think you could fit in there and if it doesn’t fit all the way then I could stop I don’t want to hurt them

GROVES: If they want your dick inside them

LAUGHTON: Would you let the little girls suck my dick

GROVES: It’s their choice

When Groves sent some of the images to Laughton, here’s how the conversation went:

LAUGHTON: Is that a little girl

GROVES: I wasn’t being serious

GROVES: Yes that’s a little girl

LAUGHTON: i like that I would like to see more of the pussy but I like that it fucking hot

LAUGHTON: Is that one of the girls we get to play with

And lastly:

LAUGHTON: That girl looks sweet

GROVES: Yeah

LAUGHTON: Do you think she would like sucking me and me rubbing my dick on her?

GROVES: Yeah

LAUGHTON: It’s just a bummer she wont let me put my dick inside of her

GROVES: She’s not even 3 yet

LAUGHTON: Yeah, I know

I absolutely hate to include the texts, but we need to understand how truly depraved and incompatible with society these sickos are.

Oh, and surprise surprise, Laughton found himself allied with high-profile Democrats, like Eric Swalwell and Beto O’Rourke:

A “trans” pedophile who fantasizes about raping children? He’s definitely not blazing any trail on that front. The creeps behind drag queen story hour only ever want audiences of children (not that I want them in nursing homes, but it’s telling that they don’t ever request it), and this story is not an outlier, it’s part of an overwhelming trend.
americanthinker

President Trump Says He Will Sue BBC For $1 Billion if No Action by Friday Night

Wikimedia Commons, Gage Skidmore, CC-BY-SA-2.0

Lawyers acting on behalf of U.S. President Donald Trump have given the UK state broadcaster the BBC until Friday night to take action over the “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory” fabricated speech they broadcast, or else face legal action for $1 billion (£750 million) in compensation.

Controversy over a leaked internal BBC document, which revealed that top executives at the state broadcaster had been aware of ethical issues surrounding their reporting on several key areas, including U.S. President Donald Trump, but appeared not to have acted meaningfully on them, continues with the threat of legal action now having been issued. A legal letter to the BBC from lawyers acting on behalf of President Trump demands a “full and fair retraction”, an immediate apology, and compensation by Friday, or the corporation will face a lawsuit.

Calling the broadcast of a doctored speech by President Trump in a Panorama documentary which was found by an internal BBC memo to have “materially misled” viewers on what the President actually said on January 6th “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory”, the letter said it should be immediately retracted.

The letter from Trump’s legal team, reproduced by The Daily Telegraph, stated that because the fabricated speech was so salacious, it was widely seen, and has caused “President Trump to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm”, compensation is owed. Further, it noted “the BBC’s reckless disregard for the truth underscores the actual malice behind the decision to publish”.

The letter gives the BBC until 5 pm EST (2200 GMT) to comply or else Trump will file for a legal action “for no less than $1,000,000,000 (One Billion Dollars) in damages.”

“The BBC is on notice,” they said.

This letter follows the resignation of the Director General Tim Davie and CEO of News Deborah Turness from the BBC overnight. British observers have stated the corporation is at a crisis point over the scandal of a doctored speech which spliced together differing remarks from President Trump to give the impression he had ordered his supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol and “fight”.

breitbart

France: a threatening man dressed in a djellaba, roaming around in the middle of the street carrying a sword; he shouted ‘Allah Akbar’

Vaulx-en-Velin quartier du Mas du-Taureau, Pl. Guy Môquet – Google Maps

The incident took place on Monday morning in the Mas-du-Taureau neighbourhood. A police investigation is underway.

A man dressed in a djellaba and armed with a katana, a Japanese sword, which he had drawn from its sheath, was arrested on Monday, November 10, 2025, while walking down the street in Vaulx-en-Velin in the Lyon metropolitan area.

During his arrest, he shouted ‘Allah Akbar’ (Allah is great, in Arabic), the Rhône prefecture confirmed to actu Lyon, corroborating information from Le Progrès.

Actu.fr

‘Let’s Show Reality’: Hashtag Goes Viral After Identitarian Activist Arrest

Migrants makeshift camp in Paris. Screengrab youtube

The arrest of influencer Jean-Eudes Gannat, who is being prosecuted for posting a video showing Afghan migrants camped outside a supermarket in his town, continues to cause controversy. The widespread outrage over the attacks against him, even beyond France’s borders, has given rise to a movement on X called “Let’s show reality,” which aims to show, with supporting images, the prevalence of immigration and population change in society.

On Tuesday, November 4th, identity activist Jean-Eudes Gannat posted a seemingly innocuous video on TikTok, leading to his arrest and detention on charges of “incitement to racial hatred.” His trial, initially scheduled to occur immediately, has been postponed until May 2026, but the young father of three has nevertheless been banned from social media for a month and is now even prohibited from frequenting the supermarket near where the video was taken. He has also been banned from contacting the Afghans in question, as he could “put pressure” on them: one wonders, in this case, where the pressure is coming from.

The speed of his arrest and the initial court ruling came as a surprise and sparked outrage in a country where the justice system is known for its delays. “If the justice system were as quick and efficient in prosecuting real criminals, our country would be much better off,” said sovereigntist MP Nicolas Dupont-Aignan. The president of an anti-racist association even expressed his support for Gannat, arguing that the incriminating video did not violate French law in any way—even though he does not share the author’s “ideas or identity-based commitments.”

The Afghans who appear in the incriminating video were pressured into filing a complaint against Gannat, as explained by his lawyer Matthieu Sassi—probably encouraged by left-wing lobbies.

At the call of journalist Liselotte Dutreuil, editor-in-chief of the programme Ligne Droite on the conservative radio station Radio Courtoisie, a movement was launched on X in support of Jean-Eudes Gannat, with the hashtag and slogan #MontronsLeRéel (Let’s show reality). The video that led to Gannat’s prosecution and conviction, which is short and unedited, simply captures a reality that many French people can see every day with their own eyes: the presence, on French soil, of invasive immigrant populations, who often degrade the environment or security to which they were accustomed, even in the most remote corners of the country.

A quote from the poet Charles Péguy, recalled by Gannat, has been reposted by numerous accounts on X: “One must always say what one sees; above all, one must always, which is more difficult, see what one sees.”

Since then, raw videos of this type have multiplied on X and send a message that is difficult to dispute: the change in population can be easily observed in everyday life and is detrimental to the living environment of the inhabitants. We see makeshift camps, gangs of drug addicts or drunks squatting on the pavement, souk-like markets, groups of veiled women—in Paris, of course, but also in Nîmes, Nantes, and Rennes.

Jean-Yves Gallou, founder of Institut Iliade, points out that in Segré, where Gannat filmed his video, crime has risen by 76% since 2020. But the public prosecutor, unable to seriously curb it, decided that banning a video filming reality in the town was a priority.

Influencers’ and journalists’ accounts have joined in, as have accounts belonging to unknown individuals and ordinary citizens, generating hundreds of thousands of views. The hashtag is also being used to tag videos posted by foreigners who are alarmed by the new face of France.

The sheer volume of material produced makes it impossible to prosecute each of these videos. This is also the aim of such a campaign, which serves to highlight the blatant injustice behind the arrest of Gannat, who claims to be the victim of judicial harassment by the French justice system.

Gannat’s original video has now been viewed over 2.2 million times.

europeanconservative

German ‘poly wedding’ of four men to each other raises eyebrows

Paul Gerhardt church in Berlin-Schöneberg showing solidarity with queer comminuties by displaying the progress flag with „Amen.“ written on it. Wikimedia Commons, Mushushu, CC-BY-SA-4.0

A German protestant church minister has surprised many after reportedly performing a marriage ceremony for four men.

As first reported by local newspaper Berliner Zeitung on November 7, Lena Müller, a 33-year-old minister from Berlin, posted on Instagram that she had held her first “poly wedding” recently.

“Four young men said ‘yes’ to each other, celebrated love with us and placed themselves under G*d’s colourful blessing,” Müller wrote in the post. The picture showed the pink-haired minister and four unnamed men.

Müller added that the quartet had chosen the Bible verse Love never ends for themselves.

“I already realised they firmly believe in this during our talk before the ceremony when they spoke of the warmth, generosity, and openness in their polycule,” she continued.

A polycule is the term for a couple-like bond between more than two people in polyamorous relationships. Polyamorous describes the practice of, or desire for, romantic relationships with more than one partner at a time, with the informed consent of all involved.

The “poly wedding” reportedly took place over the summer at a “pop-up wedding festival” in front of a protestant church in Berlin’s Kreuzberg district – where people could get married without pre-registration.

“What an honour that these four ventured so trustingly into our old [church] walls and asked for our blessings. I am grateful for this profession,” the minister concluded.

The “poly wedding” has caused a storm of outrage in Germany – where polygamy is illegal.

Art. 1306 of the German Civil Code states: “A marriage may not be contracted if one of the persons wishing to marry is already married or in a civil partnership with a third person.”

The German State, though, has shown leniency in the past towards Muslim immigrants with two or more wives.

On November 7, Christian Stäblein, Bishop of Berlin of the Protestant Church, clarified that the “poly wedding” had not been an official church ceremony as it only wed people who had previously had an official civil marriage.

The Protestant Church of Berlin-Brandenburg wrote on Instagram that its members were “shocked by the hatred [Müller] is facing”. The organisation added that it stood firmly by the minister’s side.

Müller – who has since deleted her post about the “poly wedding” – describes herself as a “feminist and minister” on Instagram and lists “inclusion and intersectional feminism, queer friendliness and anti-racism” as her focal points.

Speaking to newspaper NOZ about the “poly wedding”, Müller said: “You could see straight away that there was a lot of love between them.

“That’s why the team quickly agreed: What could God have against there now being four instead of two?”

brusselssignal