An innocent child was ‘lost’: Indian-origin Irish PM downplays kidnapping of Jewish kid by Hamas from Israel, refuses to call out terror outfit

Irish PM downplayed kidnapping for Israeli people by Hamas (Image: Telangana Today)

On 26th November (local time), Indian-origin Prime Minister of Ireland Leo Varadkar downplayed the kidnapping of Israeli civilians in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

In his post, he referred to the 8-year-old kidnapped Irish-Israeli child named Emily Hand as “lost” and not abducted by Hamas.

He wrote, “This is a day of enormous joy and relief for Emily Hand and her family. An innocent child who was lost has now been found and returned, and we breathe a massive sigh of relief. Our prayers have been answered.”

Notably, Sky News quoted Varadkar saying, “A little girl was snatched from her home and held captive for almost seven weeks. She spent her ninth birthday as a hostage. We hope she will soon heal and recover from the traumatic experience in the loving embrace of her family.” Here too, Varadkar avoided naming Hamas.

Emily was abducted by Hamas terrorists from Israel during the terrorist attack on 7th October. She was taken to Gaza and was released as part of the first exchange between Hamas and Israel where Hamas has released 50 hostages and Israel has released 150 Palestinian criminals and terrorists from the prison.

The abduction of Israeli child Emily Hand

Emily Hand, who lives in Kibbutz Be’eri, turned 9 on 24th November in captivity. She was among 13 Israelis freed on Saturday (), and one of the first 50 to be freed by Hamas. Following her release, she was reunited with her father Thomas.

In a statement, her family said, “Emily has come back to us. We can’t find the words to describe our emotions after 50 challenging and complicated days. We are overjoyed to embrace Emily again, but at the same time, we remember all the hostages who have yet to return. We will persist in doing everything in our power to bring them back home.”

Reports suggest that when Hamas attacked Israel on 7th October, Emily was sleeping at her best friend’s house. Following the attack, she lost contact with her family.

Initially, it was believed that her body was found by the family. however, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) later informed the family that they found evidence she was among the hostages held in Gaza.

Emily’s father hails from Dun Laoghaire, Dublin. Her family members in the Irish capital celebrated her birthday as part of a campaign for her release.

Israel-Hamas War

On 7th October, Hamas terrorists attacked Israel resulting in the death of at least 1,400 Israelis and foreign nationals. Israel launched a counter-attack on Hamas aiming to finish the Palestinian terrorist organisation.

After air strikes for over a month, Israel launched a ground attack in the Gaza Strip to weed out Hamas terrorists. Notably, Hamas created safe establishments under residential areas and hospitals to shield itself from Israeli attacks that IDF has to clear to ensure the terrorist organisation is wiped off from the face of the earth.

Currently, there is a ceasefire going on. As per the agreement, Hamas released 10-13 hostages every day totalling 50 Israeli hostages abducted during the 7th October attack. OpIndia’s detailed reports on the Israel-Hamas war can be checked here.

https://www.opindia.com/2023/11/irish-pm-leo-varadkar-downplays-hamas-abduction-israeli-children/

Canterbury Fails: Why We Must Oppose the Rave in the Nave

There has already been a golf course in Rochester’s Cathedral. A helter skelter in Norwich. A Star Wars display in Peterborough. A Silent Disco was held in Ely Abbey. And now the mother church, our nation’s most significant religious building, Canterbury Cathedral, the seat of the Most Reverend and Right Honourable the Lord Archbishop, Justin Welby, is to follow suit. 

Either Welby is ignorant of what is planned by his dean, David Monteith, or he is aware of it and supposedly happy for it to happen, which would make him ignorant of his job. The Rave in the Nave, as it shall probably be known, will take place over two nights in February and is a strictly 18+ event, featuring plenty of alcohol and the music of the ‘90s: Britney, Spice Girls, Eminem, and the Vengaboys.  

The usual pitiful arguments are given to justify this latest embarrassing sacrilege: “It will get young people visiting the Cathedral who wouldn’t normally, bringing them in touch with Christianity.” I’m sure. 

Profound exhortations such as the Real Slim Shady’s “My bum is on your lips, if I’m lucky you might give it a little kiss” as well as his theological musings that “if we can hump dead animals and antelopes, then there’s no reason that a man and another man can’t elope,” will be beamed into the headphones of intoxicated ravers while they contemplate the ancient architecture and 14 centuries of Christian history that they have stumbled into. A life-changing experience, which the dean must be sure will yield many Damascene conversions.

“But it will raise money for the maintenance of the Cathedral!” Entry price is roughly thirty pieces of silver (£30.95 actually—even Judas is vulnerable to inflation), and a thousand ravers are expected each night. Kerching! Let’s do Casino Night next—perhaps we can roll dice for the bloodied garments of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Strippers’ night would be a hit as well: imagine the cash that could be generated by nubile dancers sliding down the Anglo-Saxon Reculver columns! “Navels in the Nave”—a sure money spinner. “Hot Tubs in the House of God” has a nice ring to it too.

Actually, I don’t want to give the dean any more ideas. Because based on the logic that the Cathedral needs to entertain, increase young footfall and rake in the denarii, there really is no red line which cannot be crossed. He is perfectly happy to break his own laws, as the Anglican Canons of the Church of England explicitly command that churches not be “profaned by any meeting therein for temporal objects inconsistent with the sanctity of the place” and any secular music played must be “consonant with sound doctrine, and make for the edifying of the people.” Hit me baby one more time!

Honour the sacred

The gaping vacuum that clearly exists in the minds of Welby, Monteith and their fellow progressive clerics is the lack of any sense of the sacred. Which is ordinarily sort of a big deal in religion. Profaning sacred spaces for a quick buck is one of the few things which caused Welby’s ultimate boss, Our Lord Jesus Christ, to unleash His righteous fury, which upset the corrupt priesthood enough to call for crucifixion: 

Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of robbers. (Matt 21:12-13)

I understand that appealing to something as passé as Canons or Scripture might not be sufficient to persuade Welby and Monteith of the seriousness with which sacred spaces ought to be treated, so let me try to explain in secular modern terms. For the sense of the sacred still exists, even for atheists, in institutions and sites where worldly power is invested or intense human experiences have been shared.

Would it be appropriate for the Speaker of the House of Lords to hold a rave in the Chamber which scrutinises our laws and hosts our noble parliamentary traditions, to raise a few quid for the repair fund?

Would it be appropriate for the health service to announce discos in intensive care units, where so much human anguish and healing is palpably concentrated, to raise funds for more ventilators?

Would it be appropriate for the Commonwealth War Graves Commission to open up their vast cemeteries for youth to dance among the ivory tombs of men their own age who gave their tomorrows for our ungrateful and ignorant todays?

If the answer to these is a resounding no, then what makes us think that the most important religious building in our country, the site of the martyrdom and relics of Saint Thomas Becket, the repository for the mortal remains of kings, princes and bishops, the destination of millions of pilgrims for centuries, the inspiration for our greatest early work of literature, and most importantly, the site of countless prayers and sacraments—the House of God—should be treated with any less respect?

How dare Archbishop Welby and Dean Monteith, as custodians of this monumental site, betray the communion of innumerable Christians, both living and dead, of their own denomination and beyond, who treasure this place and would see it treated with the honour it deserves.

By cheapening and profaning Canterbury, they do nothing to transmit the truth, beauty and goodness of the Christian faith. They simply declare that they are unserious about their religion, that its history and message are unimportant, that the church is flailing around for a sense of relevance, and should be disregarded in favour of those who have confidence and are serious about the alternatives they offer.

Silent discos are fun. But Canterbury Cathedral is more than fun. It is sacred.

What would Jesus do?

So what should concerned Christians, and those who treasure their heritage, do about this latest embarrassment? Shall we shake our heads and ignore it, as we have done with countless other desecrations in other important sites? Or scoff that it’s just the Anglicans, you know what they’re like!

I think that would be a mistake. The Anglicans, whatever their faults, are brothers and sisters in Christ. As the Established Church, they have a profound responsibility to represent Christ in official settings. They still do this quite impressively in their ceremonial roles, as evidenced by the recent Royal Funerals and Coronation. They maintain many beautiful traditions such as evensong, and almost every village in the country has a church which is well preserved for posterity and is often still a hub for community life, and a place of comfort in times of need.

Because of their history, they own the majority of our sacred sites and churches, and in recent years have become increasingly welcoming to Catholic pilgrims, even allowing Holy Mass to be said again in the great cathedrals. So we cannot dismiss what will happen at Canterbury in February as somebody else’s problem.

No serious religion could.

As with any scandal, the perpetrators have unwittingly presented an opportunity to their opponents. Faithful Christians can use this moment to stand up for the sacred. To manifest the seriousness of their faith and teach those within and without the church of the importance of honouring God, through the places set aside for Him.

We often ask the question, what would Jesus do? In this case, the Gospel is quite clear. I submit that the lowest effort way of imitating Christ would be to pray for the conversion of the leadership in the Cathedral, and to sign this petition to make clear the disapproval of faithful Christians to that misguided hierarchy.

There are good and faithful Anglican clergy and laity who are outraged and ashamed when they hear of these things. If you are fortunate enough to know any, encourage them to join the campaign.

And when, as is likely, the petition is ignored in favour of the profanation pound, we ought to manifest in person, to pray peacefully outside the Cathedral, to give the ravers an encounter with living, breathing Christianity, and most importantly, to glorify God outside his Temple even while He is being insulted within. If our Lord could risk crucifixion to honour the house of His Father, we should be willing to risk getting a little cold on a dark February night, in order to bear witness to Him.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/essay/canterbury-fails-why-we-must-oppose-the-rave-in-the-nave/

‘We need to demolish mosques in Sweden,’ right-wing leader Jimmie Åkesson tells party congress

Swedish authorities must be handed the power to requisition and demolish mosques that are proven to be used to promote messages incompatible with Western values and the country should impose a ban on the construction of new mosques, the leader of the right-wing Sweden Democrats Jimmie Åkesson has claimed.

Speaking at a party event in the southeastern Swedish city of Vasteras on Saturday, Åkesson said that Islamic places of worship in Sweden are a breeding ground for radicalized thought and the anti-West propaganda that is infiltrating the country’s social fabric and sowing discord in Swedish communities.

“It is not a right to come to our country and build monuments to a foreign and imperialist ideology,” Åkesson told his party’s faithful.

“In the long term, we need to start confiscating and demolishing mosque buildings where anti-democratic, anti-Swedish, homophobic, or anti-Semitic propaganda or general misinformation about Swedish society is spread.

“Minarets, domes, crescents, or other attributes that serve as Islamic monuments in the cityscape should be completely removed,” he added.

Speaking to the Aftonbladet newspaper following his speech, Åkesson elaborated on his view, insisting that people should have the right to “have a gathering place if you worship a god or have a religion,” but explained that “the problem is when you force your religion on others” by “building monuments and having prayer calls. We do not think that is reasonable.”

The Sweden Democrats hold considerable influence in the country’s political landscape, propping up the center-right government of Moderate Party leader Ulf Kristersson.

The remarks will be yet another stumbling block for Sweden’s NATO accession with Islamic nations likely to condemn the latest inflammatory remarks.

Stockholm is reliant on Turkey signing off on its accession to the defense alliance, ratification that has been continuously delayed due to Ankara’s dissatisfaction with Sweden over its permittance of Quran-burning protests and its harboring of Kurdish activists Turkey believes are terrorists.

https://rmx.news/sweden/we-need-to-demolish-mosques-in-sweden-right-wing-leader-jimmie-akesson-tells-party-congress/

Was Iran behind ‘assassination attempt’ of Spain’s Vox founder?

screen grab youtube

Alejo Vidal-Quadras, the 78-year-old founder of Spain’s Vox party and a former vice president of the European Parliament, has been discharged from Gregorio Marañon hospital in Madrid two weeks after he was shot in an apparent assassination attempt.

Vidal-Quadras was shot in the face on November 9, minutes after denouncing the Socialist-separatist amnesty deal.

He accused the Tehran regime of “plotting and executing” what he said was his attempted assassination, though police are following are number of leads.

“They shot me in the face to kill me, but I miraculously survived,” he wrote in a letter sent to the National Council of Resistance of Iran, an opposition group, from his hospital bed.

The group has also blamed the Iranian Government for the attack.

Investigators have not yet ruled out the possibility of an orchestrated Iranian attack.

The National High Court has declared the investigation of Vidal-Quadra’s attempted murder as “secret”.

The failure to kill Vidal-Quadras is however raising questions among analysts about the possibility of Iran’s direct involvement. Police sources in Spain, quoted anonymously, claim it could not have been a professional job, as it was unprofessionally carried out.

The Spanish police have identified a French national of Tunisian origin as the alleged perpetrator of the attempted murder.

According to the official investigation, the gunman fled on a BMW motorbike after shooting Vidal-Quadras near his house on Núñez de Balboa Street in Madrid city centre.

Hours later, the authorities found the burnt-out motorbike in Fuenlabrada, a city 30km south of the crime scene.

The would-be killer’s whereabouts are still unknown. Analysts suggests he – or she – might have fled to Tunisia, Libya or Morocco.

According to police leaks, the attacker was hired by a Shiite couple who planned the attack from a house in the Adalusian city of Granada. They had been living there for fewer than 15 days.

Police are also looking at another theory suggesting the Moroccan regime might be behind the attack.

The Spanish authorities already detained three suspects in the southern port city of Málaga as part of the investigation. Two are Spanish nationals – one a Shiite Islam convert – and the third is a British woman.

Days before his discharge, Vidal-Quadras published an op-ed lambasting Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez.

He called Sánchez a “progressive Prime Minister who’s an ally and friend of terrorists and seditionist fugitives”.

“If something can be recognised about Pedro Sánchez, it is that he managed to bring Spain down to the level of his minimal moral stature, which is that of an ambition-drunk pygmy without merit and lacking in culture,” he added.

https://brusselssignal.eu/2023/11/was-iran-behind-assassination-attempt-of-spains-vox-founder/

Sri Lankan Islamic preacher equates the classical dance with prostitution

Islamic preacher Moulavi Abdul Hameed Sharaee, AI generated image

A controversy has erupted in Sri Lanka after an Islamic preacher named Moulavi Abdul Hameed Sharaee made derogatory comments about Bharatanatyam and claimed that performers were courtesans trying to woo the king in one of his online sermons on the Tamil Dawah Media YouTube channel. The statement was made in response to a Bharatanatyam performance by males during Teachers Day festivities at one of the Islamic institutions. Following protests by Hindus after the comments, a Muslim body in the country has issued an apology and assured that action will be taken against the cleric.

Responding to the Bharatnatyam performance on teachers’ day, Moulavi Abdul Hameed Sharaee said, “It is regrettable that men performed Bharatanatyam, a dance generally associated with Parathis, in front of students in a way that made them look like women. In the past, courtesans were referred to as ‘Parathis.’ Bharatanatyam was once performed for the amusement of kings, with the implication that prostitutes would dance to create a sensual atmosphere for the kings.”

The cultural and artistic communities have been especially outraged by the shocking remarks which critics claim insult a highly esteemed art form and reinforce antiquated prejudices. Men and women alike perform the sacred and traditional dance known as Bharatanatyam, which has its roots in South India and carries great cultural and religious significance.

The remarks sparked a fierce outcry among Sri Lankan Hindus. Students from Batticaloa’s Swami Vipulananda Institute of Aesthetic Studies held demonstrations and pupils carried signs asking the religious leader to retract and apologise for his repulsive words.

Human rights lawyer and civil society leader Thamotharam Pratheevan of Sri Lanka issued a statement denouncing the comments and calling on the Moulavi to issue an immediate apology. Furthermore, he demanded that the latter face harsh consequences from the authorities for his derogatory comments on Hindu culture. Hindus in the country posted messages on social media expressing their fury.

Vaitheesvaran Eswaran Kurukkal, a renowned Hindu leader registered his protest on Facebook and wrote, “The online distribution of a video featuring remarks by a religious leader has caused great distress to the Hindu community. We wrote to the All Sri Lanka Andolan Ulama Council on behalf of the Hindu Gurumar Sangathan to communicate our disapproval and worry. During a press conference today, the Ulama Council voiced its concerns and severely denounced the statement.”

Meanwhile, All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama apologised and slammed the insensitive and bigoted statement of the preacher. A press release issued by them noted that a video posted on 9 November by a Muslim preacher regarding the Bharatanatyam dance and later another footage in which he apologised for his remarks was seen on social media. Commenting on religious and cultural values in this manner is contrary to Islamic guidance and reprehensible. It requested all the Mulsim clerics and common Muslims to refrain from making similar comments.

The Jamiyyathul Ulama Council general secretary Asheik M Arkam Nooramidh asserted, “We strongly condemn the Moulavi remark, which has hurt the sentiments of Hindus. Making speeches against other religions cultures and traditions is against Islam and we strongly condemn the statement.” A press conference on the matter was addressed at their group’s head office in Maligawatta which was also attended by significant Hindu religious leaders.

Shazna Zawahir, a Muslim social media personality released a clip in which she criticized Abdul Hameed Sharaee for what he said. The influencer also discussed how in the name of bayan (Islamic preaching) some Moulavi’s often make videos in which they abuse and denigrate Muslim women.

Following backlash on social media, Abdul Hameed Sharaee uploaded a video on the Tamil Dawah Media channel. He clarified that the purpose of his opinion was to reference Hindu experts about Bharatanatyam and not to upset the followers of the religion. He also showed regret if his utterances offended Hindus.

Sri Lanka: Moulavi insults Bharatanatyam, compares to prostitution (opindia.com)

Is Conor McGregor Running for Office? Fed-Up UFC Legend Makes Vow After Violent Attack in Ireland

Across the world, voters have had enough of socialists and open-borders globalists.

On Sunday, libertarian Javier Milei won the presidency of Argentina. Then, on Thursday, Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom —  a Dutch populist, nationalist and anti-immigration party — secured a major election victory in the Dutch House of Representatives, making it likely that Wilders will serve as the next prime minister of the Netherlands.

Could former UFC champion and outspoken Irish patriot Conor McGregor be next?

Friday on X, formerly Twitter, McGregor threw down the gauntlet and promised to fix what ails his home country.

“There will be change in Ireland, mark my words. The change needed,” McGregor wrote as part of a lengthier post.

The Uber Left Eats Itself

Screen grab youtube

A recent survey shows that the more left-leaning a voter is, the more he uses home delivery services, which—at the same time—he also condemns as ‘exploitative.’ It’s one of those apparent paradoxes that contemporary society is so good at. And what if, after all, there was nothing more logical coming from those who praise deregulated globalisation and the destruction of traditional European lifestyles?

The survey was carried out for the French weekly Le Point and sets out to establish a sketch of the most representative users of home delivery platforms such as UberEats or Deliveroo, to name but a few, which offer their services in Paris, Lyon, and Marseilles, as well as in other major European cities. The typical user profile would be that of a left-leaning student living in a metropolis. And among them, those who vote ‘very Left’ are the most likely to have trays of sushi or tandoori chicken delivered in bags, carried by immigrant workers on bikes or scooters.

The survey was carried out using the cluster method, which has been all the rage in France since the last presidential elections. The idea is to establish standard profiles based on a convergence of sociological and behavioural criteria. One of these profiles is described as ‘progressive,’ which, according to Le Point, brings together people who are “rather young, graduates, often working in the arts and entertainment. Pro-European, pro-reception of migrants, pro-adoption for homosexual couples, overwhelmingly against the death penalty, their votes go to the Left or the far Left.” This avatar customer represents only 5% of the French population, but it is among them that the use of meal delivery platforms has reached a record 46% (compared with 19% for the French on average).

The survey carried out by the Cluster17 institute did more than just analyse the eating habits of the respondents. It also asked about their social convictions, and this is where the paradox is most apparent. Of the ‘very left-wing’ people questioned, 63% agreed with the following statement: “The model of delivery companies with self-employed, unsalaried drivers is unsatisfactory because it drives down wages by relying mainly on low-skilled foreign workers.”

And yet it is precisely the same people—absolutely the same people—who are the most compulsive worshippers of salmon sashimi, gobbled up on the living room sofa. The ‘very left’ consumer votes for parties such as Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s La France Insoumise, which in 2022 explained that it wanted to fight against the uberisation of the labour market in unambiguous terms. According to the programme of the left-wing candidate in the presidential elections, “Back-breaking work, poverty wages forcing you to pedal for a whole day to earn a minimum wage, a premium for risking your life, savage competition between platforms and between couriers.” 

Denunciation yes, renunciation no. It would seem that the gastronomic apprentices of the far Left have some difficulty in reconciling their political opinions with their everyday lifestyle choices.

In truth, the paradox is clearly apparent. The business model of delivery platforms is based on the relentless use of very cheap labour supplied en masse by immigration from sub-Saharan Africa. The typical delivery drivers working for UberEats have only recently arrived in Europe. They are often illegal, which gives their employers access to a workforce that pays little attention to working conditions and is not yet aware of the full range of rights guaranteed by trade unions. Above all, they are very cheap. 

How did it reach the pavements of our big cities? Thanks to a policy of open borders with no limits, which is precisely what UberEats customers are advocating, this is, in the end,  very logical, if not coherent. You have to reap and enjoy the fruits of your labour. Once they’ve finished their meal, sushi eaters will campaign for the regularisation of the undocumented immigrants who allow them to fill their bellies without too much effort, just to add a little good conscience and social justice to their lives. Not only does the UberEats delivery man feed the far-left activist, he also justifies his political struggle. What more could you ask for?

The near-perfect symbiosis between the far-left voter and the food delivered is not limited to implicit support for the importation of slave labour. In the final analysis, we’re dealing with an entire system of life and values; we could almost talk about an ecosystem—or a food chain. The use of ready-prepared food delivered to the home seems obvious to an uprooted individual living alone outside any traditional family structure, for whom the preparation of a formal meal is akin to an extreme right-wing ritual. Especially if it’s a woman in the kitchen. 

The model of the housewife cooking for her husband and children is consigned to the dustbin of history, and the witless bachelor enjoys a solitary poke bowl as a means of apparent liberation from the shackles of family. He can afford to do so because he lives alone on the comfortable salary guaranteed to him by the job-creating metropolis. It goes without saying that having a tray of sushi delivered several times a week when you’re a family with children is a sweet utopia. 

In the early years of the Soviet Union, Communist leaders commissioned their architects to design a new type of flat with no kitchen or a minimalist shared kitchen. The aim was to free women from domestic servitude. In these constructivist dwellings, food bought downstairs could be heated but never cooked on the premises. Although they are not quite there yet, the big cities are getting closer to this configuration, with homes where the space for the kitchen has been drastically reduced in favour of the ‘living rooms,’ where the main piece of furniture is no longer a table but a combo of screen and sofa. Food arrives from outside, is already prepared, and is gobbled up without ceremony.  

In short, the far-left consumer who defends the sushi delivery man castigates the social consequences of an order that he himself has helped to create and which he encourages with his revolutionary, globalist rhetoric. The tragedy is that it’s not clear that he actually wants to change anything about what is for him a ‘virtuous’ circle.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/the-left-uber-eats-itself/

GERMANY: Government-Funded Project Promoting “Age Play” and Diaper Fetishes to “Young Queers”

A government-funded youth project in Germany is promoting BDSM in a publication co-designed by minors. Lambda Bundesverband, an organization which receives financial support from the Federal Ministry for Family, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend – BMFSFJ), has created resources describing “humiliation play” and “age fetishes” in collaboration with children as young as 14.

Lambda provides youth sexuality counseling servicesworkshops, and summer camps publishes a magazine titled “Out!” which is co-designed with the input of, and aimed at, youth as young as 14 years of age.

But a resurfaced 2022 issue of “Out!” is drawing criticism for promoting various “kinks” to minors, including age regression and diaper fetishes.

In issue No. 59 of “Out!, the majority of the zine is dedicated entirely to discussing sexual fetishes. On the first page, a man named Cori recounts experiencing “gender euphoria” when putting on lingerie.

“Today I felt gender euphoria and I took pictures of it! I never imagined that a piece of material would give me such a beautiful moment. When I looked in the mirror, I felt a mixture of joy, happiness, and excitement. I don’t often think of myself as sexy, but in that moment I did,” Cori says, before describing how he enjoyed looking at photos of himself in the lingerie.

A note from the publication’s editor, Fabian, explains the rationale behind the decision to promote awareness of fetishism, noting that those with fetishes experience stigma.

“The entire issue revolves around fetishes. A daring topic? Perhaps. An important topic? Absolutely, says the editorial team. There is still a lot of ignorance and prejudice when it comes to fetishes,” Fabian writes.

“Fetishes are possible variations of our sexuality and are therefore neither reprehensible, disreputable or perverse. It is just as unreprehensible [sic] not to want to have sex at all, not to have a fetish, not to want to try something or to feel completely comfortable with cuddly sex.”

The publication elaborates on various types of fetishes in more detail, and introduces young readers to terms such as “bondage,” “spanking,” “flogging,” “voyeurism and exhibitionism,” “medical play,” “humiliation play,” “age fetish,” and “bodily fluids fetish.”

However, critics have expressed particular concerns about the publication’s inclusion of information pertaining to the sexualization of father/daughter relationships.

“Today I would like to introduce you to the DDLG fetish,” writes an individual known only as Sofie.

“DDLG stands for Daddy Dom Little Girl. It’s mostly about a female person putting themselves in the role of a little girl. She wears diapers and enjoys playing children’s games. If she does something naughty, her daddy can punish her.”

The anonymous author, who identifies as non-binary and claims to be addicted to porn, continues: “I clicked around on porn sites and just wanted to see what I liked. For fun, I clicked on a video titled ‘DDLG.’ I was frightened. It was about sexual acts between women dressed up as small children and men pretending to be their daddies. But what I found even worse than that was the fact that my body was reacting to it. Do I like that?”

Sofie continues by explaining that she began participating in the fetish at age 16, and describes her “daddy” treating her like a toddler.

“The first time I tried DDLG, I was 16. I remember how unsure I was at first when he first gave me a coloring book to draw in. Finally he put diapers on me like a daddy. When I was finally allowed to urinate in the diaper for the first time, I just felt free and overjoyed,” Sofie writes. The age of the male partner in the scenario remains unspecified.

One of the supporting members of Lambda Germany is politician Sven Lehmann, who secures public funds through his role as State Secretary of the Family Ministry (BMFSFJ).

In 2022, the BMFSFJ gave Lambda €450,000 ($490,200) in taxpayer funding, but overall the youth group received a total of €646,000 ($703,300) from the federal government that year. In 2023, Lambda was given €467,000 ($508,400).

Lehmann is a member of Alliance 90/The Greens who has been serving as a member of German Parliament from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia since 2017. He also has worked as the Federal Government’s Commissioner for the Acceptance of Sexual and Gender Diversity (which has been nicknamed the “Queer Commissioner”) in the coalition government since 2021.

Lehmann’s role in a leadership position for Lambda provoked criticism from far-right Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland – AfD) representative Matthias Helferich, who accused him of promoting fetishism to minors, an accusation Lehmann denounced as defamation during a debate over sex self-identification legislation on November 15.

proposed version of the Self-Determination Act (Selbstbestimmung in Bezug auf den Geschlechtseintrag – SBGG) is currently being discussed by lawmakers in Parliament and would allow minors from the age of 14 to change the sex marker on their identification and begin a medical transition. Should parents or guardians object, a family court may intervene to override a lack of consent.

Lehmann has previously drawn criticism for confessing in an interview for Queer.de to using the application Grindr during meetings in Parliament, and justifying this by stating, “Grindr is also work.” In response to public outcry, Lehmann took to Instagram to denounce critics as “TERFs” – an acronym which means “trans-exclusionary radical feminists,” and is applied broadly to any woman critical of gender identity ideology, often used alongside threats of violence.

Lambda runs sexual education programs on “queer topics” within Germany’s school system. The methods and resources used come from the Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), and also from “Sexual Pedagogical Materials for Youth Work in Leisure and School,” developed by sexologist Uwe Sielert.

Sielert similarly holds questionable views regarding sexuality and children, and has ties to controversial sexologist Helmut Kentler, who has been described as a fatherly mentor to Sielert.

Kentler, who campaigned throughout his life for the abolition of laws which prohibited the sexual abuse of children under 14 years of age, was responsible for a state-funded project that saw children sexually abused by pedophiles in an “experiment” to prove that adult-child sex was harmless.

According to Frank Herrath, a lecturer in sexology and co-founder of the Institute for Sex Education (Institut für Sexualpädagogik – ISP), “sex education in Germany was shaped by Helmut Kentler and Uwe Sielert.”

As Reduxx previously reported, Sielert was also influential in shaping policies for Germany’s leading professional association on sexuality and partnership, Pro Familia, which came under fire earlier this year after issuing a recommendation that daycares implement “body exploration rooms” and “sexual games” for young children.

https://reduxx.info/germany-government-funded-project-promoting-age-play-and-diaper-fetishes-to-young-queers/

A Syrian vandalises a church in Vienna, Austria

Wikimedia Commons , Thomas Ledl, CC-BY-SA-4.0

A refugee (29) from Syria wreaked havoc in the Kepler Church (photo above) in the Favoriten district of Vienna. He tore a statue of the Madonna from its base and stole a cross. Thanks to witness statements, the police caught the vandal in the immediate vicinity of the crime scene. The Syrian was released.
Nothing seems to be sacred to the Syrian: Officers from the Favoriten municipal police command were called at around 4pm on Friday because a man had allegedly entered a church in Vienna’s Favoriten district and torn a statue of the Madonna from its anchoring.
The fugitive also stole a wooden cross from the church. Thanks to witness statements and the evaluation of video surveillance, the migrant was apprehended in the immediate vicinity of the church and provisionally arrested.

He was released on the orders of the Vienna public prosecutor’s office. The stolen wooden cross was returned to the church by a woman. According to the police, it is unclear what the Syrian’s motive was, but they can allegedly rule out a political or religious motive.

Syrer (29) reißt Madonna in Wiener Kirche aus Verankerung | Exxpress